Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Selective silence speaks volumes. In Senate Estimates earlier this week, I asked the ABC about its recent Gaza coverage. On 22 September, Hamas publicly executed three Palestinian men accused of collaborating with Israel. At the very same time, the Prime Minister was in New York announcing Australia’s recognition of...

JNampijinpa's profile picture

Jacinta Nampijinpa

66,788 subscribers

43,904 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Once again the ABC shows us exactly why Australians are losing trust in their $1.2 billion dollar taxpayer-funded broadcaster. During Senate Estimates yesterday, I asked Managing Director Hugh Marks why the ABC failed to report on the shocking case of a 28-year-old Indigenous man who raped and impregnated a 13-year-old girl promised to him under so-called “customary law.” Commercial outlets covered it. The ABC did not. Why? Is it because the ABC is reluctant to report stories that challenge its narrative? That it might show Indigenous Australians or culture in a less flattering light? That’s what I wanted to find out. Mr Marks denied it but then couldn’t explain why Australians were kept in the dark. Australians deserve truth, not selective reporting. We deserve balance, not bias. And when our national broadcaster receives over $1.2 billion in taxpayer funding, we absolutely deserve transparency. The ABC wants to talk about “reimagining” itself. I’ll tell you what it should start with: honest reporting, free from ideological filters. Only then can Australians truly trust the stories told in their name. 📺 Watch my Senate Estimates exchange here 👇
7:31

Once again the ABC shows us exactly why Australians are losing trust in their $1.2 billion dollar taxpayer-funded broadcaster. During Senate Estimates yesterday, I asked Managing Director Hugh Marks why the ABC failed to report on the shocking case of a 28-year-old Indigenous man who raped and impregnated a 13-year-old girl promised to him under so-called “customary law.” Commercial outlets covered it. The ABC did not. Why? Is it because the ABC is reluctant to report stories that challenge its narrative? That it might show Indigenous Australians or culture in a less flattering light? That’s what I wanted to find out. Mr Marks denied it but then couldn’t explain why Australians were kept in the dark. Australians deserve truth, not selective reporting. We deserve balance, not bias. And when our national broadcaster receives over $1.2 billion in taxpayer funding, we absolutely deserve transparency. The ABC wants to talk about “reimagining” itself. I’ll tell you what it should start with: honest reporting, free from ideological filters. Only then can Australians truly trust the stories told in their name. 📺 Watch my Senate Estimates exchange here 👇

Jacinta Nampijinpa

61,560 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

CHARLIE KIRK Why did the ABC downplay one of the most significant political assassinations in recent US history? On 11 September, the ABC’s flagship 7.30 program ignored the assassination of Charlie Kirk, while commercial outlets covered it extensively. Instead, the ABC ran stories on British politics, youth crime, and prosthetics. Fifteen hours had passed. They had time. They even published an online article the same day. But somehow, no mention on prime-time TV. When the ABC did cover Kirk, they branded him a “far-right activist”. This is a loaded label they don’t apply consistently to others, including organisers of radical pro-Palestine protests. Why the double standard? Australians deserve answers. Our national broadcaster must be accurate, impartial, and consistent. That’s its Charter. 📺 Watch my Senate Estimates exchange here 👇
4:44

CHARLIE KIRK Why did the ABC downplay one of the most significant political assassinations in recent US history? On 11 September, the ABC’s flagship 7.30 program ignored the assassination of Charlie Kirk, while commercial outlets covered it extensively. Instead, the ABC ran stories on British politics, youth crime, and prosthetics. Fifteen hours had passed. They had time. They even published an online article the same day. But somehow, no mention on prime-time TV. When the ABC did cover Kirk, they branded him a “far-right activist”. This is a loaded label they don’t apply consistently to others, including organisers of radical pro-Palestine protests. Why the double standard? Australians deserve answers. Our national broadcaster must be accurate, impartial, and consistent. That’s its Charter. 📺 Watch my Senate Estimates exchange here 👇

Jacinta Nampijinpa

182,120 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, acting on behalf of Australia, have rewarded Hamas for its terrorism and hostage-taking of civilians with a symbolic recognition of Palestinian statehood, while acknowledging the genocidal intent behind Hamas’s actions. Australia has joined France, Canada, and the United Kingdom in opposing the United States, which has warned that rewarding Hamas will embolden it and derail efforts to demilitarise the region and remove Hamas from Gaza.
0:41

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, acting on behalf of Australia, have rewarded Hamas for its terrorism and hostage-taking of civilians with a symbolic recognition of Palestinian statehood, while acknowledging the genocidal intent behind Hamas’s actions. Australia has joined France, Canada, and the United Kingdom in opposing the United States, which has warned that rewarding Hamas will embolden it and derail efforts to demilitarise the region and remove Hamas from Gaza.

Rukshan Fernando

48,779 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Lammy (David Lammy): "Let us not confuse the Palestinian people with Hamas." Head of the Palestinian Mission to the UK Husam Zomlot (Husam Zomlot): "Hamas is part of the Palestinian struggle; I refuse to label it as a terrorist organization." David Lammy is a fool (and so is everyone else in Keir Starmer's government).
0:38

Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Lammy (David Lammy): "Let us not confuse the Palestinian people with Hamas." Head of the Palestinian Mission to the UK Husam Zomlot (Husam Zomlot): "Hamas is part of the Palestinian struggle; I refuse to label it as a terrorist organization." David Lammy is a fool (and so is everyone else in Keir Starmer's government).

GnasherJew®גנאשר

32,859 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

AUSTRALIA HAS A HAMAS PROBLEM — AND ITS POLITICAL LEADERS KEEP LOOKING AWAY (Source link in comments) In 2023, Australia’s Prime Minister was photographed with Sheikh Shadi Al Suleiman, president of the Australian National Imams Council, and the Grand Mufti of Australia. In 2012, those same two men were photographed in Gaza with Hamas leadership. Fast-forward to Sheikh Shadi’s testimony before the Royal Commission: he had no problem explicitly condemning ISIS as a terrorist organization with no connection to Islam. But when it came to Hamas — a listed terrorist organization in Australia — there was no such condemnation. That matters. Sheikh Shadi represents hundreds of imams across Australia. If he can denounce ISIS clearly, why can’t he do the same with Hamas? At a time when Hamas symbols and rhetoric are increasingly appearing in Australian activist circles, Jewish Australians deserved clarity from one of the country’s most prominent Muslim leaders. They didn’t get it.
2:08

AUSTRALIA HAS A HAMAS PROBLEM — AND ITS POLITICAL LEADERS KEEP LOOKING AWAY (Source link in comments) In 2023, Australia’s Prime Minister was photographed with Sheikh Shadi Al Suleiman, president of the Australian National Imams Council, and the Grand Mufti of Australia. In 2012, those same two men were photographed in Gaza with Hamas leadership. Fast-forward to Sheikh Shadi’s testimony before the Royal Commission: he had no problem explicitly condemning ISIS as a terrorist organization with no connection to Islam. But when it came to Hamas — a listed terrorist organization in Australia — there was no such condemnation. That matters. Sheikh Shadi represents hundreds of imams across Australia. If he can denounce ISIS clearly, why can’t he do the same with Hamas? At a time when Hamas symbols and rhetoric are increasingly appearing in Australian activist circles, Jewish Australians deserved clarity from one of the country’s most prominent Muslim leaders. They didn’t get it.

Mossad Commentary

24,484 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

#breakingnews Israel-Hamas war: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Israel accepted a cease-fire deal to stop the war in Gaza. Hamas has yet to say 'yes' to the proposal. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu agreed to bring a close to the end of the 10-month conflict on Monday. Hamas resumed negotiations this week with the U.S. bridging a proposal. Israeli PM Netanyahu said he had a very "constructive" meeting with Blinken. Hamas accused Netanyahu of "thwarting the mediators' efforts, according to Reuters.
9:59

#breakingnews Israel-Hamas war: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Israel accepted a cease-fire deal to stop the war in Gaza. Hamas has yet to say 'yes' to the proposal. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu agreed to bring a close to the end of the 10-month conflict on Monday. Hamas resumed negotiations this week with the U.S. bridging a proposal. Israeli PM Netanyahu said he had a very "constructive" meeting with Blinken. Hamas accused Netanyahu of "thwarting the mediators' efforts, according to Reuters.

𝘒𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘫𝘢🇵🇸𝘙𝘦𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘈𝘊𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦

21,447 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

HAVE THE ABC CENSORED THEIR INTERVIEW WITH AUSTRALIA’S LEADING NUCLEAR EXPERT ? On Wednesday I was listening to the ABC and they had an interview with Australia’s leading nuclear expert, the former head of ANSTO at Lucas Heights, Dr Adi Paterson. I’ve known Dr Paterson from my days as the member for Hughes, where Australia’s only nuclear reactor is located, and I consider him one of the smartest blokes I’ve ever met. He knows his stuff inside out. Dr. Paterson cut the ABC interviewer to pieces as he methodically debunked every leftist anti-nuclear meme with evidence and the science. Now the ABC normally posts these interviews on their various websites and social media platforms, but nowhere could I find a recording of this most important interview anywhere in the ABC. Given that the nuclear debate is now of such national significance to Australia‘s future, you’d think an ABC interview with Australia’s leading nuclear expert would be given absolutely priority to be posted on the ABC’s platforms. But instead, as Dr. Paterson’s comments contradicted the ABC’s leftist anti-nuclear narrative it appears to have been censored. If the ABC have in fact censored this, that should be the final straw, the ABC should be defunded. The attached recording of this interview is from Nuclear Australia’s YouTube page. If anyone can find a recording of this interview on any ABC platform, I’ll be happy to apologise.
11:27

HAVE THE ABC CENSORED THEIR INTERVIEW WITH AUSTRALIA’S LEADING NUCLEAR EXPERT ? On Wednesday I was listening to the ABC and they had an interview with Australia’s leading nuclear expert, the former head of ANSTO at Lucas Heights, Dr Adi Paterson. I’ve known Dr Paterson from my days as the member for Hughes, where Australia’s only nuclear reactor is located, and I consider him one of the smartest blokes I’ve ever met. He knows his stuff inside out. Dr. Paterson cut the ABC interviewer to pieces as he methodically debunked every leftist anti-nuclear meme with evidence and the science. Now the ABC normally posts these interviews on their various websites and social media platforms, but nowhere could I find a recording of this most important interview anywhere in the ABC. Given that the nuclear debate is now of such national significance to Australia‘s future, you’d think an ABC interview with Australia’s leading nuclear expert would be given absolutely priority to be posted on the ABC’s platforms. But instead, as Dr. Paterson’s comments contradicted the ABC’s leftist anti-nuclear narrative it appears to have been censored. If the ABC have in fact censored this, that should be the final straw, the ABC should be defunded. The attached recording of this interview is from Nuclear Australia’s YouTube page. If anyone can find a recording of this interview on any ABC platform, I’ll be happy to apologise.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

117,752 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

BREAKING: Netanyahu Losing His Mind over ICC Arrest Warrant "The absurd and false order of the prosecutor in The Hague is not only directed against the Prime Minister of Israel and the Minister of Defense - it is directed against the entire State of Israel. It is directed against the IDF soldiers, who are fighting with supreme heroism against the vile Hamas murderers, who attacked us with terrible cruelty on October 7. Prosecutor in The Hague, With what audacity do you dare compare the monsters of Hamas to the soldiers of the IDF, the most moral army in the world?! With what audacity you compare between the Hamas that murdered, burned, butchered, raped, and kidnapped our brothers and sisters, and the IDF soldiers who are fighting a just war that is unparalleled in morality that is unmatched. As the prime minister of Israel, I reject with disgust the Hague prosecutor's comparison between democratic Israel and the mass murderers of Hamas."
1:42

BREAKING: Netanyahu Losing His Mind over ICC Arrest Warrant "The absurd and false order of the prosecutor in The Hague is not only directed against the Prime Minister of Israel and the Minister of Defense - it is directed against the entire State of Israel. It is directed against the IDF soldiers, who are fighting with supreme heroism against the vile Hamas murderers, who attacked us with terrible cruelty on October 7. Prosecutor in The Hague, With what audacity do you dare compare the monsters of Hamas to the soldiers of the IDF, the most moral army in the world?! With what audacity you compare between the Hamas that murdered, burned, butchered, raped, and kidnapped our brothers and sisters, and the IDF soldiers who are fighting a just war that is unparalleled in morality that is unmatched. As the prime minister of Israel, I reject with disgust the Hague prosecutor's comparison between democratic Israel and the mass murderers of Hamas."

Censored Man

1,334,020 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Decorated Special Forces commando, Heston Russell, was falsely accused of being a war criminal by the ABC. As I told Liam Bartlett on Channel 7’s Spotlight program after pursuing this in senate estimates, our national broadcaster has very serious questions to answer. Now the ABC stands accused of doctoring a video, adding extra gunshots to a soldier’s helmet footage. Here’s an excerpt ⬇️. See the incredible full story about Heston’s fight for justice at
1:48

Decorated Special Forces commando, Heston Russell, was falsely accused of being a war criminal by the ABC. As I told Liam Bartlett on Channel 7’s Spotlight program after pursuing this in senate estimates, our national broadcaster has very serious questions to answer. Now the ABC stands accused of doctoring a video, adding extra gunshots to a soldier’s helmet footage. Here’s an excerpt ⬇️. See the incredible full story about Heston’s fight for justice at

Senator Sarah Henderson

22,491 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨🇮🇱 NETANYAHU: “PALESTINIANS ARE NOT ABOUT CREATING, BUT ABOUT DESTROYING A STATE” "Those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, ‘But don’t exercise it.’ I think we’re actually applying force judiciously - and they know it. Hamas in Gaza had a de facto state, and it used it to launch a war of terror against Israel. The Palestinian Authority, on the other hand, says: first, Israel has to be reduced to indefensible boundaries, and then deliver the blow." Source: Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו, Prime Minister of Israel
3:38

🚨🇮🇱 NETANYAHU: “PALESTINIANS ARE NOT ABOUT CREATING, BUT ABOUT DESTROYING A STATE” "Those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, ‘But don’t exercise it.’ I think we’re actually applying force judiciously - and they know it. Hamas in Gaza had a de facto state, and it used it to launch a war of terror against Israel. The Palestinian Authority, on the other hand, says: first, Israel has to be reduced to indefensible boundaries, and then deliver the blow." Source: Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו, Prime Minister of Israel

Mario Nawfal

80,155 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A furious Israeli in Bondi talks to an ABC reporter and nails it. I wonder how much of this will make it on the ABC... "They were killed. And what did Australia do? Our government, Albanese and Penny Wong, you gave 25 million dollars to Gaza." "You have to stand with Israel because in Israel we have exactly the same values as in Australia. We value life. Those people value death. If you harbour the people who value death. The death will come to Australia. In fact, I'm really sorry, the death came to Australia. This is a Nova Festival massacre in Australia."
2:02

A furious Israeli in Bondi talks to an ABC reporter and nails it. I wonder how much of this will make it on the ABC... "They were killed. And what did Australia do? Our government, Albanese and Penny Wong, you gave 25 million dollars to Gaza." "You have to stand with Israel because in Israel we have exactly the same values as in Australia. We value life. Those people value death. If you harbour the people who value death. The death will come to Australia. In fact, I'm really sorry, the death came to Australia. This is a Nova Festival massacre in Australia."

Daniel

3,731,362 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

VIDEO | Delhi: On PM Narendra Modi's address to the nation, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "I heard the Prime Minister's speech just now, and I was wondering whether the Prime Minister is speaking as Prime Minister or the leader of the BJP in Parliament. Behind the Prime Minister was the national flag, and he was speaking as Prime Minister of India while an election is going on. This is a new low in the politics of India. But I know that neither the Chief Election Commissioner nor any other institution will do anything about it..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
1:52

VIDEO | Delhi: On PM Narendra Modi's address to the nation, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "I heard the Prime Minister's speech just now, and I was wondering whether the Prime Minister is speaking as Prime Minister or the leader of the BJP in Parliament. Behind the Prime Minister was the national flag, and he was speaking as Prime Minister of India while an election is going on. This is a new low in the politics of India. But I know that neither the Chief Election Commissioner nor any other institution will do anything about it..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

322,181 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This government had three main goals. One, the return of all the hostages. Two, ending Hamas’ rule. And three, ensuring the government there would not belong to the Palestinian Authority. These three goals are achieved in this agreement. And we get the hostages back within 72 hours. If not, there is full backing from Qatar to Turkey for destroying Hamas. It’s quite astounding. What was not achieved? The goals of the coalition’s rightmost flank were not achieved, which were not war goals: annexation, settlement and emigration — hence the right-wing flank’s sourness. I think this agreement, or Trump's plan that was presented, is a dream plan for Israel. I wish it will be fully implemented, because then there won’t be a need to fight anymore. But on the reasonable assumption that Hamas is the same Hamas, the sea is the same sea, and the Arabs are the same Arabs, then Israel remains in Gaza without the hostages, with the equation of demilitarization for withdrawal, stuck on the Philadelphi Corridor where many of our soldiers unfortunately fell, remaining on the entire perimeter, and when the Palestinian Authority’s reforms are completed, including stopping terrorist salaries and other measures, perhaps a new horizon will open. Where is the danger in principle? And here it stands out in relation to Israel’s fully right-wing government. Another president, a Democrat, another prime minister from Israel’s center-left will come and say, “Look, if the most right-wing Israeli government and most pro-Israel American president actually gave even a hint of a Palestinian state, then I won’t be more righteous than the pope.” That’s the issue for the coming years. In the near future, this is a dream achievement for Israel.
1:38

This government had three main goals. One, the return of all the hostages. Two, ending Hamas’ rule. And three, ensuring the government there would not belong to the Palestinian Authority. These three goals are achieved in this agreement. And we get the hostages back within 72 hours. If not, there is full backing from Qatar to Turkey for destroying Hamas. It’s quite astounding. What was not achieved? The goals of the coalition’s rightmost flank were not achieved, which were not war goals: annexation, settlement and emigration — hence the right-wing flank’s sourness. I think this agreement, or Trump's plan that was presented, is a dream plan for Israel. I wish it will be fully implemented, because then there won’t be a need to fight anymore. But on the reasonable assumption that Hamas is the same Hamas, the sea is the same sea, and the Arabs are the same Arabs, then Israel remains in Gaza without the hostages, with the equation of demilitarization for withdrawal, stuck on the Philadelphi Corridor where many of our soldiers unfortunately fell, remaining on the entire perimeter, and when the Palestinian Authority’s reforms are completed, including stopping terrorist salaries and other measures, perhaps a new horizon will open. Where is the danger in principle? And here it stands out in relation to Israel’s fully right-wing government. Another president, a Democrat, another prime minister from Israel’s center-left will come and say, “Look, if the most right-wing Israeli government and most pro-Israel American president actually gave even a hint of a Palestinian state, then I won’t be more righteous than the pope.” That’s the issue for the coming years. In the near future, this is a dream achievement for Israel.

Amit Segal

50,956 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

18 years ago today, Hamas staged a military coup and violently took over Gaza. But to understand how it got to that point, we need to go back a little bit. Gaza was a part of the Ottoman Empire for centuries, and later, the British mandate, and in 1948, was under Egyptian control. In 1967, in the defensive Six-Day War, Israel seized over the Gaza Strip intending to hand it over in future peace negotiations. In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza and handed control over to the Palestinian people. While the move wasn't part of a formal peace agreement, it reflected the broader Land for Peace thinking. Israel gives land in exchange for peaceful living with its neighbors. This worked relatively well with Egypt in the Sinai Peninsula and with Jordan. Many Israelis, me included, hoped that Gaza would become a model for Palestinian self-rule and a step towards a peaceful Middle East. Then in 2006, came the Palestinian legislative elections. I remember the warnings very clearly. The United States, European leaders, Israel, even the United Nations, everyone cautioned the Palestinians against allowing Hamas, a jihadi terrorist organization which aims to enact an Islamist caliphate to run for elections. We all knew what Hamas was. Their founding charter openly calls for the destruction of Israel and for the murder of Jews. Now, allowing Hamas to participate in the Palestinian elections is like letting the KKK or a neo-Nazi group to appear on the ballot and pretend that they're just another political party. They're not. But they ran anyway and they won, narrowly, 74 out of 132 seats. Most Palestinians weren't voting for terror. They were voting actually against the corruption and dysfunction of the Palestinian Authority, but Hamas saw the outcome very differently. Ismail Haniyeh was appointed prime minister and a unity government was supposed to be formed, but Hamas had no intention of governing responsibly or sharing power. Hamas refused to recognize Israel, stop its violence, or accept previous agreements, and in response, the international community cut off their fundings. Tensions quickly escalated between Hamas and Fatah, which was the political party that controlled most of the Palestinian Authority's governing institutions and security forces, and on June 10th, 2007, gun battles broke out across Gaza. Hamas turned its weapons against their own people and launched a bloody coup against the Palestinian Authority security forces. Political opponents were dragged through the streets, thrown from rooftops, and executed, obviously without trial. That's when Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar, got his nickname, the Butcher of Khan Yunis. Four days later, on June 14th, Hamas took full control of Gaza and began imposing their version of Sharia law. Hamas destroyed Gaza. They received billions of dollars in international aid over the years, but instead of investing in hospitals, schools, jobs, they used that money to create the most fortified piece of land on Earth, build an elaborated terror tunnel system, and stock up on ammunitions, rockets, and bombs. Since taking power, they've held the people of Gaza hostage while launching endless attacks on Israeli civilians. It didn't have to be this way. Gaza could've become the next Singapore or Dubai. It's a beautiful coastal city with so much potential, but Hamas chose jihadism over jobs and terror over technology. And on October 7th, 2023, Hamas showed the entire world what it had been working on, and it was not a Palestinian state. The suffering in Gaza is not the result of Israel. It is the result of Hamas. The Palestinian people never asked for this. They didn't vote for a dictatorship. Hamas took over Gaza by force and they've ruled it with fear ever since. So if you care about Palestinians, if you care about peace, you should be calling to free Palestine, but not from Israel. You should be calling to free Palestine from Hamas.
4:11

18 years ago today, Hamas staged a military coup and violently took over Gaza. But to understand how it got to that point, we need to go back a little bit. Gaza was a part of the Ottoman Empire for centuries, and later, the British mandate, and in 1948, was under Egyptian control. In 1967, in the defensive Six-Day War, Israel seized over the Gaza Strip intending to hand it over in future peace negotiations. In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza and handed control over to the Palestinian people. While the move wasn't part of a formal peace agreement, it reflected the broader Land for Peace thinking. Israel gives land in exchange for peaceful living with its neighbors. This worked relatively well with Egypt in the Sinai Peninsula and with Jordan. Many Israelis, me included, hoped that Gaza would become a model for Palestinian self-rule and a step towards a peaceful Middle East. Then in 2006, came the Palestinian legislative elections. I remember the warnings very clearly. The United States, European leaders, Israel, even the United Nations, everyone cautioned the Palestinians against allowing Hamas, a jihadi terrorist organization which aims to enact an Islamist caliphate to run for elections. We all knew what Hamas was. Their founding charter openly calls for the destruction of Israel and for the murder of Jews. Now, allowing Hamas to participate in the Palestinian elections is like letting the KKK or a neo-Nazi group to appear on the ballot and pretend that they're just another political party. They're not. But they ran anyway and they won, narrowly, 74 out of 132 seats. Most Palestinians weren't voting for terror. They were voting actually against the corruption and dysfunction of the Palestinian Authority, but Hamas saw the outcome very differently. Ismail Haniyeh was appointed prime minister and a unity government was supposed to be formed, but Hamas had no intention of governing responsibly or sharing power. Hamas refused to recognize Israel, stop its violence, or accept previous agreements, and in response, the international community cut off their fundings. Tensions quickly escalated between Hamas and Fatah, which was the political party that controlled most of the Palestinian Authority's governing institutions and security forces, and on June 10th, 2007, gun battles broke out across Gaza. Hamas turned its weapons against their own people and launched a bloody coup against the Palestinian Authority security forces. Political opponents were dragged through the streets, thrown from rooftops, and executed, obviously without trial. That's when Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar, got his nickname, the Butcher of Khan Yunis. Four days later, on June 14th, Hamas took full control of Gaza and began imposing their version of Sharia law. Hamas destroyed Gaza. They received billions of dollars in international aid over the years, but instead of investing in hospitals, schools, jobs, they used that money to create the most fortified piece of land on Earth, build an elaborated terror tunnel system, and stock up on ammunitions, rockets, and bombs. Since taking power, they've held the people of Gaza hostage while launching endless attacks on Israeli civilians. It didn't have to be this way. Gaza could've become the next Singapore or Dubai. It's a beautiful coastal city with so much potential, but Hamas chose jihadism over jobs and terror over technology. And on October 7th, 2023, Hamas showed the entire world what it had been working on, and it was not a Palestinian state. The suffering in Gaza is not the result of Israel. It is the result of Hamas. The Palestinian people never asked for this. They didn't vote for a dictatorship. Hamas took over Gaza by force and they've ruled it with fear ever since. So if you care about Palestinians, if you care about peace, you should be calling to free Palestine, but not from Israel. You should be calling to free Palestine from Hamas.

Noa Tishby

26,750 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Hamas is trying to commit genocide, not Israel. This week, Israel will defend herself against preposterous allegations of genocide in the International Court of Justice. That’s right, the term which was created to describe the largest killing of Jews in the 20th century is now being weaponized against the Jewish state during the largest killing of Jews in the 21st century. Israel is not committing genocide, it was dragged into a war when Hamas attacked on October 7th. Once again, this is not a war between Israel and the Palestinian people. This is a war between Israel and Hamas, a genocidal terrorist organization whose stated goal is the eradication of Jews. A stated goal of genocide. If following the hearing this week, the International Court of Justice calls for Israel to stop defending itself, they will effectively hand out a victory to Hamas. The International Court of Justice should not only refrain from issuing a judgement calling for Israel to stop defending itself, but this shameful case should be dismissed and thrown out in its entirety. CIJ_ICJ United Nations
3:39

Hamas is trying to commit genocide, not Israel. This week, Israel will defend herself against preposterous allegations of genocide in the International Court of Justice. That’s right, the term which was created to describe the largest killing of Jews in the 20th century is now being weaponized against the Jewish state during the largest killing of Jews in the 21st century. Israel is not committing genocide, it was dragged into a war when Hamas attacked on October 7th. Once again, this is not a war between Israel and the Palestinian people. This is a war between Israel and Hamas, a genocidal terrorist organization whose stated goal is the eradication of Jews. A stated goal of genocide. If following the hearing this week, the International Court of Justice calls for Israel to stop defending itself, they will effectively hand out a victory to Hamas. The International Court of Justice should not only refrain from issuing a judgement calling for Israel to stop defending itself, but this shameful case should be dismissed and thrown out in its entirety. CIJ_ICJ United Nations

Noa Tishby

341,601 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Afshin Rattansi questions former UK🇬🇧 Defence Minister on Britain’s role in the Gaza genocide: Afshin: What do you think about RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus being used for that genocide? Tobias Ellwood: “It wasn’t used for the genocide. It was actually used as part of understanding the intelligence that was being used to understand what Hamas was doing, and to control the environment after that barbaric attack by Hamas. I do believe Britain should have done far, far more in advocating a clear strategy, a direction of travel and standing up to Prime Minister Netanyahu and what he’s done, particularly in the post-7th of October in where Gaza is going…” Afshin: ‘Would you end arms to Israel, British arms to Israel, if you were Defence Minister?’ Tobias Ellwood: “I don’t think anything can be done without the Americans on board as well. But it has to be used as a tool to influence what Israel is doing. From my perspective, I should distinguish between Israel and the Prime Minister,because many of us advocate and 100% support Israel’s right to exist. This is a difficult neighbourhood. This is a democracy. But what Netanyahu has done in promoting war for the sake of war, not just in Gaza but also in Lebanon as well, has been deeply unhelpful and has actually moved us into a more insecure place…” Afshin: ‘It’s considered an apartheid state by most people in the world…’ Watch the full interview with Tobias Ellwood, author of ‘Ten Ways to Stop World War 3’, in the quoted post below👇
3:02

Afshin Rattansi questions former UK🇬🇧 Defence Minister on Britain’s role in the Gaza genocide: Afshin: What do you think about RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus being used for that genocide? Tobias Ellwood: “It wasn’t used for the genocide. It was actually used as part of understanding the intelligence that was being used to understand what Hamas was doing, and to control the environment after that barbaric attack by Hamas. I do believe Britain should have done far, far more in advocating a clear strategy, a direction of travel and standing up to Prime Minister Netanyahu and what he’s done, particularly in the post-7th of October in where Gaza is going…” Afshin: ‘Would you end arms to Israel, British arms to Israel, if you were Defence Minister?’ Tobias Ellwood: “I don’t think anything can be done without the Americans on board as well. But it has to be used as a tool to influence what Israel is doing. From my perspective, I should distinguish between Israel and the Prime Minister,because many of us advocate and 100% support Israel’s right to exist. This is a difficult neighbourhood. This is a democracy. But what Netanyahu has done in promoting war for the sake of war, not just in Gaza but also in Lebanon as well, has been deeply unhelpful and has actually moved us into a more insecure place…” Afshin: ‘It’s considered an apartheid state by most people in the world…’ Watch the full interview with Tobias Ellwood, author of ‘Ten Ways to Stop World War 3’, in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

16,761 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

On Piers Morgan Uncensored this week about the NYT smear: it’s absurd for anyone to morally equate these two reports in the first place. One, a 289-page commission report based on forensic evidence, survivor testimony, hostage accounts, 1,800 hours of footage, and 10,000 photos documenting Hamas’ systematic sexual violence on October 7th. The other, an opinion column by Nicholas Kristof relying heavily on Hamas-linked sources, anonymous and/or contradicting testimonies (including from an alleged victim who was previously arrested by the PA for assisting Hamas), and absurd unverified claims about “dog rape”. What’s more, it was published the night before the October 7th report dropped, with the knowledge that the Israeli report was about to be published. Suddenly, the same people who denied or downplayed Hamas’ mass rape campaign became deeply concerned about Palestinian victims of sexual violence? I must have missed the outrage over Hamas sexually abusing Palestinian women in Gaza en masse which was reported several weeks ago. The issue was never about Palestinians. The moment evidence of Hamas atrocities emerged, a PR campaign was launched accusing Israel of the very crimes Hamas committed. Anyone comparing the two is falling into the trap.
3:02

On Piers Morgan Uncensored this week about the NYT smear: it’s absurd for anyone to morally equate these two reports in the first place. One, a 289-page commission report based on forensic evidence, survivor testimony, hostage accounts, 1,800 hours of footage, and 10,000 photos documenting Hamas’ systematic sexual violence on October 7th. The other, an opinion column by Nicholas Kristof relying heavily on Hamas-linked sources, anonymous and/or contradicting testimonies (including from an alleged victim who was previously arrested by the PA for assisting Hamas), and absurd unverified claims about “dog rape”. What’s more, it was published the night before the October 7th report dropped, with the knowledge that the Israeli report was about to be published. Suddenly, the same people who denied or downplayed Hamas’ mass rape campaign became deeply concerned about Palestinian victims of sexual violence? I must have missed the outrage over Hamas sexually abusing Palestinian women in Gaza en masse which was reported several weeks ago. The issue was never about Palestinians. The moment evidence of Hamas atrocities emerged, a PR campaign was launched accusing Israel of the very crimes Hamas committed. Anyone comparing the two is falling into the trap.

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر

11,974 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This was, without question, the worst day of the Carney government to date. The Foreign Minister blamed the democratic State of Israel — not the terrorist group Hamas. The Justice Minister announced he’s working from home and will be taking meetings on Zoom, as though the justice system were a tech startup. The Heritage Minister — who has nothing to do with pipelines — publicly contradicted the Prime Minister on energy policy. What’s next? Will he put a Canadian flag on a barrel of oil and call it culture? And then there’s the Housing Minister, who made it clear that making homes more affordable just isn’t a priority for him. You’ll forgive the language, but today was a complete and utter clusterfuck. From now on, only the Prime Minister speaks. Everyone else? Sit down. Take notes. And stop sinking the ship. Or as PM Carney would say “CA SUFFIT!”
0:32

This was, without question, the worst day of the Carney government to date. The Foreign Minister blamed the democratic State of Israel — not the terrorist group Hamas. The Justice Minister announced he’s working from home and will be taking meetings on Zoom, as though the justice system were a tech startup. The Heritage Minister — who has nothing to do with pipelines — publicly contradicted the Prime Minister on energy policy. What’s next? Will he put a Canadian flag on a barrel of oil and call it culture? And then there’s the Housing Minister, who made it clear that making homes more affordable just isn’t a priority for him. You’ll forgive the language, but today was a complete and utter clusterfuck. From now on, only the Prime Minister speaks. Everyone else? Sit down. Take notes. And stop sinking the ship. Or as PM Carney would say “CA SUFFIT!”

Dimitris Soudas 🇨🇦⚜️🇬🇷☦️ 13.12.1943

305,474 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce