正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

SemiAnalysis ClusterMAX Lead Jordan Nanos explains how Nebius picked up demand CoreWeave couldn’t handle and then executed well enough to reach the Platinum tier of its GPU cloud rankings: “CoreWeave has set the standard. I mean, they are the best in terms of technology.” “These guys deploy 10,000 GPUs...

tbpn's profile picture

TBPN

1,588,764 subscribers

39,002 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 条评论

ElectronArtist_32 的头像
ElectronArtist_324 天前

@JordanNanos i love that 'we can't accept your $100M until May' is now a flex. turning away money is the most polite way of saying you're sold out

The Bullish Broke Guy X 的头像
The Bullish Broke Guy X4 天前

@JordanNanos Demand spilling from $CRWV to Nebius says the bottleneck is not silicon, it is delivery. Both rent the same $NVDA chips; the winner is whoever has the power contract and the crew to build.

agileveredcap 的头像
agileveredcap4 天前

@JordanNanos All of them will probably do well. Even iren will eventually get good tech due to coding agents

Mikhail Avady 的头像
Mikhail Avady4 天前

@JordanNanos they aren't that close @nebiusai is better

Brown 的头像
Brown3 天前

@SemiAnalysis_ @JordanNanos Coreweave is giving their capacity to big customers and delivering much faster, not giving any rando with $100m immediate capacity

相关视频

SemiAnalysis's Jordan Nanos says CoreWeave is so backed up a customer with $100 million to spend was told to wait until May, so Nebius has been capitalizing "They're serving this middle tier of the market. CoreWeave has set the standard. I mean, they are the best in terms of technology, this reliability stuff I'm talking about. They just have so much data for monitoring." "I mean, these guys deploy 10,000 GPUs a week at the peak when they're building data centers. And so that's incredible. But like their balance sheet is full. There's only so many people that you can marshal and resources to build out another gigawatt when they're going to 1.5 and beyond." "So Nebius has really capitalized on this middle tier of the market, which is not small." "Like I said, this is customers who are coming to us and saying, hey, I saw you write such good things about CoreWeave. I just have $100 million. I'm trying to give it to them. They're telling me they can't accept it until May of next year because they're backed up. And therefore, Nebius has been capitalizing." ______ For more commentary on CoreWeave and Nebius:
0:48

SemiAnalysis's Jordan Nanos says CoreWeave is so backed up a customer with $100 million to spend was told to wait until May, so Nebius has been capitalizing "They're serving this middle tier of the market. CoreWeave has set the standard. I mean, they are the best in terms of technology, this reliability stuff I'm talking about. They just have so much data for monitoring." "I mean, these guys deploy 10,000 GPUs a week at the peak when they're building data centers. And so that's incredible. But like their balance sheet is full. There's only so many people that you can marshal and resources to build out another gigawatt when they're going to 1.5 and beyond." "So Nebius has really capitalized on this middle tier of the market, which is not small." "Like I said, this is customers who are coming to us and saying, hey, I saw you write such good things about CoreWeave. I just have $100 million. I'm trying to give it to them. They're telling me they can't accept it until May of next year because they're backed up. And therefore, Nebius has been capitalizing." ______ For more commentary on CoreWeave and Nebius:

Fireside Alpha

59,732 次观看 • 4 天前

Who remembers when Satya threw shade at CoreWeave on the Bg2 Pod back in December 2024, when he referred to their relationship as a "one-time thing", and implied that Microsoft had managed to get caught up on AI infrastructure (after they were initially blindsided by the success of ChatGPT)? "That (the CoreWeave partnership) is a one-time thing, and then now it's all catching up.. so that was just more about trying to get caught up with demand." Fast forward to 2026 and Microsoft has not only increased the scope of its arrangement with CoreWeave, but also signed ~$50B+ in new deals across the entire neocloud spectrum ($17B with Nebius, $10B with IREN, tens of billions with nScale, multiple billions with Lambda, etc.). Absolutely diabolical that CoreWeave was seemingly better prepared for the growth in AI infrastructure demand than Microsoft, considering Microsoft funded the large majority of OpenAI's early research and had full exclusive access to its IP.. $CRWV $MSFT
1:01

Who remembers when Satya threw shade at CoreWeave on the Bg2 Pod back in December 2024, when he referred to their relationship as a "one-time thing", and implied that Microsoft had managed to get caught up on AI infrastructure (after they were initially blindsided by the success of ChatGPT)? "That (the CoreWeave partnership) is a one-time thing, and then now it's all catching up.. so that was just more about trying to get caught up with demand." Fast forward to 2026 and Microsoft has not only increased the scope of its arrangement with CoreWeave, but also signed ~$50B+ in new deals across the entire neocloud spectrum ($17B with Nebius, $10B with IREN, tens of billions with nScale, multiple billions with Lambda, etc.). Absolutely diabolical that CoreWeave was seemingly better prepared for the growth in AI infrastructure demand than Microsoft, considering Microsoft funded the large majority of OpenAI's early research and had full exclusive access to its IP.. $CRWV $MSFT

Rittenhouse Research

68,266 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sequoia's Carl Eschenbach on the founder traits that matter most when scaling a company: "One of the things I absolutely look for is self-awareness in founders, and are they honest about what they’re good at? Because a lot of these founders are just incredibly intelligent human beings, and sometimes they think they can do everything. Do they have the self-awareness to say, 'I need to go get other people as part of the company to help me scale so I can focus on what I’m really good at?'" "There are attributes and characteristics of people that I look for that are way beyond the intelligence side of the equation. You can’t teach grit. You can’t teach drive. You can’t teach a great attitude. You can’t teach determination." "All of those are things that are innate and part of people, and you want to see that in these founders. When you find someone who has that passion, drive, desire, and relentless ability to fight through challenges, issues, and opportunities — and then they have the intellectual horsepower on the other side — when that comes together, that’s a beautiful thing."
1:43

Sequoia's Carl Eschenbach on the founder traits that matter most when scaling a company: "One of the things I absolutely look for is self-awareness in founders, and are they honest about what they’re good at? Because a lot of these founders are just incredibly intelligent human beings, and sometimes they think they can do everything. Do they have the self-awareness to say, 'I need to go get other people as part of the company to help me scale so I can focus on what I’m really good at?'" "There are attributes and characteristics of people that I look for that are way beyond the intelligence side of the equation. You can’t teach grit. You can’t teach drive. You can’t teach a great attitude. You can’t teach determination." "All of those are things that are innate and part of people, and you want to see that in these founders. When you find someone who has that passion, drive, desire, and relentless ability to fight through challenges, issues, and opportunities — and then they have the intellectual horsepower on the other side — when that comes together, that’s a beautiful thing."

TBPN

15,950 次观看 • 6 个月前

Brad Gerstner Brad Gerstner discussing why CoreWeave $CRWV is the only neocloud position he likes.. Interesting to hear from someone who knows Jensen, Altman, Satya etc. very well.. "We were investors in CoreWeave when it was a private company. We've been investors, you know, as they entered the public market and it's pulled back here, we've added to our position. We're not adding to other neoclouds. We don't think other neoclouds are created equal. We think CoreWeave stands alone in terms of its performance, the software that it's build on top of the cloud, its execution capability, its strategic importance to Nvidia in terms of deploying Rubin, etcetera. So we think it makes a really interesting opportunity."
0:28

Brad Gerstner Brad Gerstner discussing why CoreWeave $CRWV is the only neocloud position he likes.. Interesting to hear from someone who knows Jensen, Altman, Satya etc. very well.. "We were investors in CoreWeave when it was a private company. We've been investors, you know, as they entered the public market and it's pulled back here, we've added to our position. We're not adding to other neoclouds. We don't think other neoclouds are created equal. We think CoreWeave stands alone in terms of its performance, the software that it's build on top of the cloud, its execution capability, its strategic importance to Nvidia in terms of deploying Rubin, etcetera. So we think it makes a really interesting opportunity."

Rittenhouse Research

195,796 次观看 • 8 个月前

“All they’re hearing outside of Red Bull is they’re going to move that car to a bit more of a drivable car, maybe a bit more away from Max and try and like balance it out a little bit more. So I think that’s going to be focus and that will help Isaac.” JPM:“ARE THEY REALLY??? I MEAN THE BASELINE PROBABLY IS BUT ONCE YOU KNOW MAX DRIVES IT AND GOES I DON’T LIKE THIS IT NEEDS TO GO THIS WAY. THAT’S WHERE THE TEAM IS GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION. DO WE JUST GO ON MAX WAY AGAIN OR DO WE GO GENERIC?” “And how do they actually do that as well? Because the car has not hit the track, is such a different, it’s going to be a different generation of cars. So all they’re doing is looking at data, simultator details I guess, that the drivers will be working on. Max will be working on, but you know, they’re going to be led by his feedback at this point. Well, they’re not going to take Yuki’s feedback and think we’re going to go that way. They’re going to take Max’s because he’s the lead driver” JPM: “BUT LOOK WHEN CHECO CAME IN, CHECO WAS BEATING MAX AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR AND HE LOOKED REALLY GOOD AND THEN MAX SAID I DON’T LIKE THE CAR I DON’T LIKE THE CAR, AND AS SOON AS THEY CHANGE THE CAR TO MAX AND GET MAX MORE COMFORTABLE, CHECO WAS NEVER SEEN AGAIN” 🔥🔥🔥
1:06

“All they’re hearing outside of Red Bull is they’re going to move that car to a bit more of a drivable car, maybe a bit more away from Max and try and like balance it out a little bit more. So I think that’s going to be focus and that will help Isaac.” JPM:“ARE THEY REALLY??? I MEAN THE BASELINE PROBABLY IS BUT ONCE YOU KNOW MAX DRIVES IT AND GOES I DON’T LIKE THIS IT NEEDS TO GO THIS WAY. THAT’S WHERE THE TEAM IS GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION. DO WE JUST GO ON MAX WAY AGAIN OR DO WE GO GENERIC?” “And how do they actually do that as well? Because the car has not hit the track, is such a different, it’s going to be a different generation of cars. So all they’re doing is looking at data, simultator details I guess, that the drivers will be working on. Max will be working on, but you know, they’re going to be led by his feedback at this point. Well, they’re not going to take Yuki’s feedback and think we’re going to go that way. They’re going to take Max’s because he’s the lead driver” JPM: “BUT LOOK WHEN CHECO CAME IN, CHECO WAS BEATING MAX AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR AND HE LOOKED REALLY GOOD AND THEN MAX SAID I DON’T LIKE THE CAR I DON’T LIKE THE CAR, AND AS SOON AS THEY CHANGE THE CAR TO MAX AND GET MAX MORE COMFORTABLE, CHECO WAS NEVER SEEN AGAIN” 🔥🔥🔥

Carolina 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

223,954 次观看 • 1 年前

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on the fight against banning open-source AI: “There’s a real move underway to ban open-source, specifically open-source AI, and specifically the math under AI, which is fairly mind-boggling for me as an engineer. It’s not that complicated. It’s linear algebra. It’s gradient descent. These are fairly basic algorithms. They’re taught broadly in schools today. My nine-year-old is starting to learn this stuff. There are videos on YouTube that teach you how to do this. There’s textbooks. Half the kids in the Stanford freshman class are taking the intro to AI course, and they’re learning this stuff. But there are serious discussions in Washington, and they’re disconcerting on this topic because they seriously talk about this. And then there are outright bans, and there’s also what I call the potential for this stifling blanket of regulation. The precedent for that is what’s happened in the EU, where they’ve actually done this. They’ve actually implemented a stifling blanket of regulation, including most recently on AI. And the result? They’ve effectively outlawed, to a large extent, they’ve outlawed technology startups in the EU. The market has responded. There’s a handful that are really good, but there are not very many. Europe used to be amazing. Half the great tech companies in the world used to be in Europe, and now it’s down to a very small number. We have this real-life cautionary example of how this can go bad. And then we have a fair number of people in the US and in California, which is amazing, who basically want to adopt the EU model, and they’re lobbying very hard to do that. Some of those people, by the way, are true believers. They really believe that there’s a profound societal threat or existential threat, or various other kinds of threats. They really believe it—you can see it in their eyes. And then there’s a bunch of other people that have commercial self-interest. They want to establish monopolies or cartels of different kinds. They want there to be government protection for their business. And so there’s this unholy alliance that has formed between these two groups. We just had this real fight in California.”
1:59

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on the fight against banning open-source AI: “There’s a real move underway to ban open-source, specifically open-source AI, and specifically the math under AI, which is fairly mind-boggling for me as an engineer. It’s not that complicated. It’s linear algebra. It’s gradient descent. These are fairly basic algorithms. They’re taught broadly in schools today. My nine-year-old is starting to learn this stuff. There are videos on YouTube that teach you how to do this. There’s textbooks. Half the kids in the Stanford freshman class are taking the intro to AI course, and they’re learning this stuff. But there are serious discussions in Washington, and they’re disconcerting on this topic because they seriously talk about this. And then there are outright bans, and there’s also what I call the potential for this stifling blanket of regulation. The precedent for that is what’s happened in the EU, where they’ve actually done this. They’ve actually implemented a stifling blanket of regulation, including most recently on AI. And the result? They’ve effectively outlawed, to a large extent, they’ve outlawed technology startups in the EU. The market has responded. There’s a handful that are really good, but there are not very many. Europe used to be amazing. Half the great tech companies in the world used to be in Europe, and now it’s down to a very small number. We have this real-life cautionary example of how this can go bad. And then we have a fair number of people in the US and in California, which is amazing, who basically want to adopt the EU model, and they’re lobbying very hard to do that. Some of those people, by the way, are true believers. They really believe that there’s a profound societal threat or existential threat, or various other kinds of threats. They really believe it—you can see it in their eyes. And then there’s a bunch of other people that have commercial self-interest. They want to establish monopolies or cartels of different kinds. They want there to be government protection for their business. And so there’s this unholy alliance that has formed between these two groups. We just had this real fight in California.”

Arjun Khemani

91,352 次观看 • 1 年前

CoreWeave and Nebius are not tech companies. They are equipment leasing businesses. Jim Chanos on iConnections: strip the AI narrative and you have companies that buy GPUs from $NVDA and rent them to hyperscalers. The economics confirm it - mid-to-high single-digit pre-tax returns on capital where the data is available. His rule: a middleman in a supply chain should never trade at a higher multiple than the company that controls its supply. Nvidia sets GPU prices. CoreWeave takes them. TSMC sets chip supply. Neo clouds depend on it. The market has this relationship inverted. That is the compression trade. Full supply chain breakdown and what it means for neo cloud valuations: Source: iConnections -
1:53

CoreWeave and Nebius are not tech companies. They are equipment leasing businesses. Jim Chanos on iConnections: strip the AI narrative and you have companies that buy GPUs from $NVDA and rent them to hyperscalers. The economics confirm it - mid-to-high single-digit pre-tax returns on capital where the data is available. His rule: a middleman in a supply chain should never trade at a higher multiple than the company that controls its supply. Nvidia sets GPU prices. CoreWeave takes them. TSMC sets chip supply. Neo clouds depend on it. The market has this relationship inverted. That is the compression trade. Full supply chain breakdown and what it means for neo cloud valuations: Source: iConnections -

Podcast Alpha

65,844 次观看 • 3 个月前

SPENCER PRATT: “I feel like people are all hyped on socialism because they’re like, everything’s so expensive! America’s failed! Give me money!” “But what they’re forgetting is all the people that these socialists are saying they’re taking the money [from] and giving it [to], they’re going to leave.” “And then they’re not going to have any money to take from these people to give to you.” “I keep telling people, the way we get you money is stopping the socialism, letting the successful rich people build businesses, build restaurants, put money into your pocket because there’s more jobs. There’s more opportunity.” “That’s how we actually get you more money.” “To lie to you and tell you we’re going to tax these rich people...we already taxed so much in LA, in California, I can’t even comprehend taxing more.”
1:26

SPENCER PRATT: “I feel like people are all hyped on socialism because they’re like, everything’s so expensive! America’s failed! Give me money!” “But what they’re forgetting is all the people that these socialists are saying they’re taking the money [from] and giving it [to], they’re going to leave.” “And then they’re not going to have any money to take from these people to give to you.” “I keep telling people, the way we get you money is stopping the socialism, letting the successful rich people build businesses, build restaurants, put money into your pocket because there’s more jobs. There’s more opportunity.” “That’s how we actually get you more money.” “To lie to you and tell you we’re going to tax these rich people...we already taxed so much in LA, in California, I can’t even comprehend taxing more.”

Overton

198,305 次观看 • 3 个月前

President Trump: “CNN, fake news.” CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “Are you willing to make a deal that does not include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, or is that now a top priority?” Trump: “I would say it’s a very big priority because you see that’s — that’s one thing that’s a little different than other things. We can bomb the hell out of them. We can knock them out for a loop. But to close the Strait, all you need is one terrorist that somehow has a truck loaded with. Because you can carry them in trucks, large trucks, a water mine, drop them in the water. And now you tell people that own ships that cost $1 billion to don’t worry about the mine. You can do that even just by saying, we put mines in the water. So, it’s not like the rest. We can knock out their military. We already have. We’ve knocked out their navy, we’ve knocked out their air force completely. We knocked out 158 ships in three days. We’ve knocked out even their mine droppers. They don’t have any mind droppers anymore, but they put them on other boats and they could drop them. I’m not even sure they have any mines there, by the way. I’m not sure. I’m — personally, they say there might be a — I don’t know, I don’t know, I think there might be none because they’re very good bullshit artists. That’s why, for 47 years, they’ve been bullshitting other presidents and they haven’t done the job. And people are living in hell. You live in that country. They’re living in hell. No, I think that 47 years of this stuff is long enough. They’re at the weakest point they’ve ever been. They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no anti-aircraft weaponry. They have no radar. They have no communication. In fact, the biggest problem we have in our negotiation is that they can’t communicate. I said to Steve, what are they saying? Sir, they can’t communicate. They have no method of communication. So we’re doing we’re communicating like they used to communicate 2,000 years ago with children, bringing a note back and forth. They have no communication. But all I want to see is I want to have a safe world, and you’re not going to have a safe world. Israel will be gone, the Middle East will be gone, and then they’re coming for Europe. And I have to tell you, I’m very disappointed in NATO. Very. I think that NATO, I think it’s a mark on NATO that will never disappear, never disappear in my mind. You know, they’re coming to see me on Wednesday. They’re going to say, oh, we’ll do this. We’ll do that. Now they all of a sudden want to send things, you know. But they said it loud and clear at the beginning when I spoke to U.K., of all I would have said, they would have been the first because they’ve been there, the oldest. And I say, yeah, I’d love to have a little help. I said, no sir, we’d rather wait till you win. I said, I don’t need help after we win. They have two old broken aircraft carriers. Barely work. I said, I guess we can use them. Who the hell knows? I called the general. He didn’t even want them. He said, we don’t really need them. We got. We got the SS Abraham Lincoln, sir. We don’t need them. You know, we have in terms of technology, we had one day, 101 missiles going at 2,700 miles an hour aimed at the Abraham Lincoln, 101 missiles. Out of 101 missiles, 101 missiles were shot down. Unbelievable technology. Ten years ago, five years ago. I don’t know if that would have been possible, but ten years ago, that wouldn’t have been that wouldn’t have been possible. 101 missiles heading to a ship that’s not that far off the coast. And out of the 101 missiles, we shot down all 101. We have weaponry. The Patriots are unbelievable. We have weaponry. That’s unbelievable.”
3:49

President Trump: “CNN, fake news.” CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “Are you willing to make a deal that does not include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, or is that now a top priority?” Trump: “I would say it’s a very big priority because you see that’s — that’s one thing that’s a little different than other things. We can bomb the hell out of them. We can knock them out for a loop. But to close the Strait, all you need is one terrorist that somehow has a truck loaded with. Because you can carry them in trucks, large trucks, a water mine, drop them in the water. And now you tell people that own ships that cost $1 billion to don’t worry about the mine. You can do that even just by saying, we put mines in the water. So, it’s not like the rest. We can knock out their military. We already have. We’ve knocked out their navy, we’ve knocked out their air force completely. We knocked out 158 ships in three days. We’ve knocked out even their mine droppers. They don’t have any mind droppers anymore, but they put them on other boats and they could drop them. I’m not even sure they have any mines there, by the way. I’m not sure. I’m — personally, they say there might be a — I don’t know, I don’t know, I think there might be none because they’re very good bullshit artists. That’s why, for 47 years, they’ve been bullshitting other presidents and they haven’t done the job. And people are living in hell. You live in that country. They’re living in hell. No, I think that 47 years of this stuff is long enough. They’re at the weakest point they’ve ever been. They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no anti-aircraft weaponry. They have no radar. They have no communication. In fact, the biggest problem we have in our negotiation is that they can’t communicate. I said to Steve, what are they saying? Sir, they can’t communicate. They have no method of communication. So we’re doing we’re communicating like they used to communicate 2,000 years ago with children, bringing a note back and forth. They have no communication. But all I want to see is I want to have a safe world, and you’re not going to have a safe world. Israel will be gone, the Middle East will be gone, and then they’re coming for Europe. And I have to tell you, I’m very disappointed in NATO. Very. I think that NATO, I think it’s a mark on NATO that will never disappear, never disappear in my mind. You know, they’re coming to see me on Wednesday. They’re going to say, oh, we’ll do this. We’ll do that. Now they all of a sudden want to send things, you know. But they said it loud and clear at the beginning when I spoke to U.K., of all I would have said, they would have been the first because they’ve been there, the oldest. And I say, yeah, I’d love to have a little help. I said, no sir, we’d rather wait till you win. I said, I don’t need help after we win. They have two old broken aircraft carriers. Barely work. I said, I guess we can use them. Who the hell knows? I called the general. He didn’t even want them. He said, we don’t really need them. We got. We got the SS Abraham Lincoln, sir. We don’t need them. You know, we have in terms of technology, we had one day, 101 missiles going at 2,700 miles an hour aimed at the Abraham Lincoln, 101 missiles. Out of 101 missiles, 101 missiles were shot down. Unbelievable technology. Ten years ago, five years ago. I don’t know if that would have been possible, but ten years ago, that wouldn’t have been that wouldn’t have been possible. 101 missiles heading to a ship that’s not that far off the coast. And out of the 101 missiles, we shot down all 101. We have weaponry. The Patriots are unbelievable. We have weaponry. That’s unbelievable.”

Curtis Houck

1,171,553 次观看 • 5 个月前

John: "Over in China, they’re doing robot Olympics. They’re doing marathons and all sorts of stuff." Figure founder Brett Adcock: “We look at the distribution of what humans do that is useful, and we [designed our humanoid] to do as much of that as possible.” “These things where we run marathons, or we do backflips, or we do karate moves—they’re not in the main part of the distribution. They don’t matter. And if you really want to size for those, you’re going to build a really expensive and unsafe robot that’s hard to manufacture.” “People want the $10,000 humanoid that can do general-purpose work. We want it to do laundry and dishes and be a companion. I want to ship robots at scale into the workforce to do logistics and healthcare, and build buildings and data centers.” "I don't need [our humanoid] to do backflips to do any of that work. I want robots building other robots."
2:14

John: "Over in China, they’re doing robot Olympics. They’re doing marathons and all sorts of stuff." Figure founder Brett Adcock: “We look at the distribution of what humans do that is useful, and we [designed our humanoid] to do as much of that as possible.” “These things where we run marathons, or we do backflips, or we do karate moves—they’re not in the main part of the distribution. They don’t matter. And if you really want to size for those, you’re going to build a really expensive and unsafe robot that’s hard to manufacture.” “People want the $10,000 humanoid that can do general-purpose work. We want it to do laundry and dishes and be a companion. I want to ship robots at scale into the workforce to do logistics and healthcare, and build buildings and data centers.” "I don't need [our humanoid] to do backflips to do any of that work. I want robots building other robots."

TBPN

15,419 次观看 • 7 个月前

Nick Saban explains the difference between a mistake that deserves getting chewed out and one that deserves encouragement “I always sort of had a lot of respect for the fact that any player that’s a competitor wants to do well. And I think when you start with that, you have a better perspective because you look at things from their perspective, not your perspective. And I think that’s very helpful.” “Sometimes when guys are not doing intangible things, whether it’s giving effort or focusing or making mental errors or things that they can actually control, that is something that you can’t tolerate. And you really want to maybe sometimes get after a guy a little bit for it.” “But when guys are doing those things and just not having success, I think that’s when you want to pat them on the back and get them to believe in themselves and have an understanding if they continue to do things the right way, they will eventually have success.” “And every player’s different. Sometimes you got guys that are obsessive-compulsive type personalities that are really hard on themselves, and I don’t think you need to get on those guys because they’re already getting on themselves.” “Then you have other guys that may not be self-starters, and you got to push them a little bit more to get them to be what they’re capable of being. I think all those things were factors in how you kind of approach a player and try to get him to be the best he can be.” “I always tried to focus on the individual and not look at it like one size fits all, and try to take the best approach with that particular guy to help him have success.”
2:00

Nick Saban explains the difference between a mistake that deserves getting chewed out and one that deserves encouragement “I always sort of had a lot of respect for the fact that any player that’s a competitor wants to do well. And I think when you start with that, you have a better perspective because you look at things from their perspective, not your perspective. And I think that’s very helpful.” “Sometimes when guys are not doing intangible things, whether it’s giving effort or focusing or making mental errors or things that they can actually control, that is something that you can’t tolerate. And you really want to maybe sometimes get after a guy a little bit for it.” “But when guys are doing those things and just not having success, I think that’s when you want to pat them on the back and get them to believe in themselves and have an understanding if they continue to do things the right way, they will eventually have success.” “And every player’s different. Sometimes you got guys that are obsessive-compulsive type personalities that are really hard on themselves, and I don’t think you need to get on those guys because they’re already getting on themselves.” “Then you have other guys that may not be self-starters, and you got to push them a little bit more to get them to be what they’re capable of being. I think all those things were factors in how you kind of approach a player and try to get him to be the best he can be.” “I always tried to focus on the individual and not look at it like one size fits all, and try to take the best approach with that particular guy to help him have success.”

Josh Chambers

98,178 次观看 • 7 天前

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on people forgetting the quality Arsenal already have: “That’s human nature, I think. When you talk to people and ask them, ‘What is on your bucket list?’ people write a lot about the bucket list. “And sometimes we forget the reverse bucket list, which is the things that you already have in your life that are incredible. “But you put so much emphasis on the next thing that nothing seems to be enough. It happens in life, and I think it’s very important to value what you have. “That’s what I said about the squad and how much I love our players. I really value what we have and what we have created together. “And then ambition is great. Let’s always have the ambition to be better, especially to evolve the players and the things that we already have within the club. “But let’s not lose perspective of what we already have, which is amazing, and we are very lucky to have them.”
1:12

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on people forgetting the quality Arsenal already have: “That’s human nature, I think. When you talk to people and ask them, ‘What is on your bucket list?’ people write a lot about the bucket list. “And sometimes we forget the reverse bucket list, which is the things that you already have in your life that are incredible. “But you put so much emphasis on the next thing that nothing seems to be enough. It happens in life, and I think it’s very important to value what you have. “That’s what I said about the squad and how much I love our players. I really value what we have and what we have created together. “And then ambition is great. Let’s always have the ambition to be better, especially to evolve the players and the things that we already have within the club. “But let’s not lose perspective of what we already have, which is amazing, and we are very lucky to have them.”

Connor Humm

52,585 次观看 • 24 天前

The Older Millennial speaks about the Muslim takeover of America He breaks down how it’s very real, very serious, there is a plan in place being executed and it’s happening right now “We have to stop ignoring it” “Here in the United States have to take seriously what is happening in Europe, and more specifically, the United Kingdom. Because Europe has always been a precursor to everything that’s gonna happen in the United States. Like there’s a rare thing that they have an issue that doesn’t eventually make its way across the pond. And the migrant crisis they’re dealing with, that’s coming our way. Now, it’s obviously much more blatant in the United Kingdom, you know, ‘cause they’re a much smaller population. because of their small population, we’re seeing the effects in a very rapid rate. But I mean, make no mistake, the UK, I mean, they’re gonna get out-breeded. I mean, just simple average of numbers. Migrants coming from the Middle East are having double the size of families the people in the UK are. The average migrant Muslim family has 3 kids. The average family in the UK that’s actually British has one and a half. And they’re bringing in millions. Just on a basic mathematical calculation, they’re f**ed. That’s not even talking about the vandalism of the churches, the roving gangs of people doing some awful sht to young girls, the changing of the entire culture of cities. Like we already see it here in the US. There’s this nice little city of Michigan. Well, it used to be a nice little city, but we’re seeing the changes already. We can’t just keep ignoring that this is happening. Look, if you wanna stick your head in the sand, that’s fine. Just do that and shut the fk up. But for everybody else with two functioning eyeballs and a f*ing logic system that actually wants to operate, we know this is coming here. And it’s not like we’re questioning what their intentions are. They’re very clear about what they want to happen, and they’re very clear about the steps they’re taking to make it happen, and we have to stop ignoring it. There is a direct effort to undermine the values of Western society, and if we keep pretending that that’s not a problem, we’re gonna have a real problem on our hands”
1:50

The Older Millennial speaks about the Muslim takeover of America He breaks down how it’s very real, very serious, there is a plan in place being executed and it’s happening right now “We have to stop ignoring it” “Here in the United States have to take seriously what is happening in Europe, and more specifically, the United Kingdom. Because Europe has always been a precursor to everything that’s gonna happen in the United States. Like there’s a rare thing that they have an issue that doesn’t eventually make its way across the pond. And the migrant crisis they’re dealing with, that’s coming our way. Now, it’s obviously much more blatant in the United Kingdom, you know, ‘cause they’re a much smaller population. because of their small population, we’re seeing the effects in a very rapid rate. But I mean, make no mistake, the UK, I mean, they’re gonna get out-breeded. I mean, just simple average of numbers. Migrants coming from the Middle East are having double the size of families the people in the UK are. The average migrant Muslim family has 3 kids. The average family in the UK that’s actually British has one and a half. And they’re bringing in millions. Just on a basic mathematical calculation, they’re f**ed. That’s not even talking about the vandalism of the churches, the roving gangs of people doing some awful sht to young girls, the changing of the entire culture of cities. Like we already see it here in the US. There’s this nice little city of Michigan. Well, it used to be a nice little city, but we’re seeing the changes already. We can’t just keep ignoring that this is happening. Look, if you wanna stick your head in the sand, that’s fine. Just do that and shut the fk up. But for everybody else with two functioning eyeballs and a f*ing logic system that actually wants to operate, we know this is coming here. And it’s not like we’re questioning what their intentions are. They’re very clear about what they want to happen, and they’re very clear about the steps they’re taking to make it happen, and we have to stop ignoring it. There is a direct effort to undermine the values of Western society, and if we keep pretending that that’s not a problem, we’re gonna have a real problem on our hands”

Wall Street Apes

57,002 次观看 • 10 个月前

Tucker Carlson: “They’re Going to STEAL the Election” “Joe Biden can’t win in a fair election,” said Tucker Carlson “So what does that tell you?” he asked. “Well, they’re going to steal the election. And we know they’re going to steal the election because they’re now saying so out loud.” “The chief law enforcement officer of the United States [Merrick Garland] government is telling you that it’s immoral, in fact racist, in fact illegal, to ask people for their IDs when they vote to verify they are who they say they are.”
4:20

Tucker Carlson: “They’re Going to STEAL the Election” “Joe Biden can’t win in a fair election,” said Tucker Carlson “So what does that tell you?” he asked. “Well, they’re going to steal the election. And we know they’re going to steal the election because they’re now saying so out loud.” “The chief law enforcement officer of the United States [Merrick Garland] government is telling you that it’s immoral, in fact racist, in fact illegal, to ask people for their IDs when they vote to verify they are who they say they are.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

4,548,397 次观看 • 2 年前

Marco Rubio had the State Department crowd CRACKING UP after revealing that so many foreign leaders want to attend the UFC Freedom 250 at the White House that it could spark a “diplomatic crisis.” RUBIO: “I can tell you this is true and I can tell you about your global reach because the president and I have another job and spend a lot of time at the White House...” “The number of foreign leaders that want to come to this is unbelievable!” “It’s to the point where we may have a diplomatic crisis...” [Crowd cracks up] “Because it’s like we can’t bring everybody...and some of them don’t even have a fighter in the fight from their country.” “They just want to come because they’re fans of the sport and they follow it.”
0:49

Marco Rubio had the State Department crowd CRACKING UP after revealing that so many foreign leaders want to attend the UFC Freedom 250 at the White House that it could spark a “diplomatic crisis.” RUBIO: “I can tell you this is true and I can tell you about your global reach because the president and I have another job and spend a lot of time at the White House...” “The number of foreign leaders that want to come to this is unbelievable!” “It’s to the point where we may have a diplomatic crisis...” [Crowd cracks up] “Because it’s like we can’t bring everybody...and some of them don’t even have a fighter in the fight from their country.” “They just want to come because they’re fans of the sport and they follow it.”

Overton

231,385 次观看 • 3 个月前

OUTSTANDING answer from Secretary Marco Rubio on the Iranian regime vs. the Iranian people: “[T]his regime is not — guys, I know I’ve said this — I think I said this in my hearing before the Senate when I got confirmed, I don’t know of any country in the world where there’s a bigger difference between the people and the people who run the country, okay? This country is run by radical Shia clerics, and that’s not what Iran and the Iranian people are. Now, they may be Shia, but they’re not radicals and they’re not clerics. And they just want a normal life and a regular life. And, in many ways, a very cosmopolitan country with a with an incredible history, incredible history, an incredible legacy and the like. So, there’s this huge divide between the people of Iran whom we sympathize with and who the President sympathize with, because they’re the ones suffering. Look, the world is a victim of Iran, okay? The world is a victim of Iran because they’re terrorists, because of what they’re doing now on the Straits. But the people of Iran are daily victims of the regime. And the president has deep sympathy for what they’re going through. And I think he’s just expressing that sympathy and that frustration that they don’t have the ability to do more to get rid of this regime that has crushed this country and isolated it from the world, which is a country that shouldn’t be isolated from the world because its people are phenomenal.”
1:05

OUTSTANDING answer from Secretary Marco Rubio on the Iranian regime vs. the Iranian people: “[T]his regime is not — guys, I know I’ve said this — I think I said this in my hearing before the Senate when I got confirmed, I don’t know of any country in the world where there’s a bigger difference between the people and the people who run the country, okay? This country is run by radical Shia clerics, and that’s not what Iran and the Iranian people are. Now, they may be Shia, but they’re not radicals and they’re not clerics. And they just want a normal life and a regular life. And, in many ways, a very cosmopolitan country with a with an incredible history, incredible history, an incredible legacy and the like. So, there’s this huge divide between the people of Iran whom we sympathize with and who the President sympathize with, because they’re the ones suffering. Look, the world is a victim of Iran, okay? The world is a victim of Iran because they’re terrorists, because of what they’re doing now on the Straits. But the people of Iran are daily victims of the regime. And the president has deep sympathy for what they’re going through. And I think he’s just expressing that sympathy and that frustration that they don’t have the ability to do more to get rid of this regime that has crushed this country and isolated it from the world, which is a country that shouldn’t be isolated from the world because its people are phenomenal.”

Curtis Houck

43,429 次观看 • 4 个月前