Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Senator Graham on Iran: I think the regime will collapse with sustained pressure. It’s so weak. You know, they fly F-14s? A lot has happened since Top Gun 1. So their Air Force is — that’s a great movie, but it was made in the ’80s. So I don’t... show more

Clash Report

707,079 subscribers

68,746 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: U.S Sen. Lindsey Graham: Iran can hurt our soldiers but you've got to take some risk. I think the risk of supporting regime change, helping the people, is far less than the risk of pulling the plug . So can they hit our bases? Yes. Is the risk worth it? Yes.

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: U.S Sen. Lindsey Graham: Iran can hurt our soldiers but you've got to take some risk. I think the risk of supporting regime change, helping the people, is far less than the risk of pulling the plug . So can they hit our bases? Yes. Is the risk worth it? Yes.

Suppressed News.

52,915 views • 6 months ago

CIA Whistleblower Prof. Melvin Goodman: ‘The US🇺🇸 will target Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities, Israel will move EVEN FURTHER to the right.’ ‘Netanyahu, I think, is going to press for military force. And I think the targets may have a lot more to do with ballistic missiles than they do with the nuclear programme. Because my contacts tell me that from satellite photography, it’s the ballistic missile sites that are being rebuilt. That’s where the heavy construction is going on in Iran. But Netanyahu is a war president. It’s war that’s keeping him in office. When he faces an election, he’s going to have a problem. But we shouldn’t assume that things will get better in Israel, because I think there’s a greater chance that the government will move even further to the right. So it’s a dangerous situation. The genocide is terrible. And Joe Biden and Donald Trump have cooperated with that genocide. For Netanyahu, as he did a few weeks ago, to complain about deliveries is just nonsense. There was one interruption of heavy tonnage bombs that they never should have gotten in the first place because of the damage to civilians. But they’re getting all the military aid they want and they always have, and they’re probably about to get more.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

CIA Whistleblower Prof. Melvin Goodman: ‘The US🇺🇸 will target Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities, Israel will move EVEN FURTHER to the right.’ ‘Netanyahu, I think, is going to press for military force. And I think the targets may have a lot more to do with ballistic missiles than they do with the nuclear programme. Because my contacts tell me that from satellite photography, it’s the ballistic missile sites that are being rebuilt. That’s where the heavy construction is going on in Iran. But Netanyahu is a war president. It’s war that’s keeping him in office. When he faces an election, he’s going to have a problem. But we shouldn’t assume that things will get better in Israel, because I think there’s a greater chance that the government will move even further to the right. So it’s a dangerous situation. The genocide is terrible. And Joe Biden and Donald Trump have cooperated with that genocide. For Netanyahu, as he did a few weeks ago, to complain about deliveries is just nonsense. There was one interruption of heavy tonnage bombs that they never should have gotten in the first place because of the damage to civilians. But they’re getting all the military aid they want and they always have, and they’re probably about to get more.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

30,632 views • 6 months ago

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 views • 1 month ago

Gray TV’s Jon Decker: “Next week, you have a very important meeting with President Xi in Beijing. Secretary Bessent has said that a top priority on the agenda will be Iran. What do you hope to achieve with President Xi as it relates to Iran?” President Trump: “Well, I have a very good relationship with President Xi. You know, I find it to be a tremendous guy. And we get along well. And you see how we do. We’re doing a lot of business with China and making a lot of money. We’re making a lot of money. It’s different than it used to be. But I’ll be talking about it. That’ll be one subject. But he’s been very nice about this. You know, in all fairness, he gets like 60% of his oil from Hormuz. And he’s been — I think he’s been very respectful. We haven’t been challenged by China. They don’t challenge us, and he wouldn’t do that. I don’t think he’d do that because of me. But I think he’s been very respectful. And we’ve offered, you know, if he wants to send the ships to the United States — I think one of the big things that’s happened is I made a statement. Send your — send your ships to Texas. It’s not that much further. Send your ships to Louisiana. Send your ships to Alaska. Alaska is actually very close to a lot of the Asian countries. People don’t realize it. You know, Japan is back and forth. It’s like it doesn’t seem it, but it’s a very short route, two days shorter than almost any other route. We’re making tremendous big deals with South Korea and with Japan. But I said, send your ships. All of a sudden, I don’t know if you saw the graph today. And this is Space Force, which I created — Space Force has — they just sent out some photos of the ships that are lined up all the way down the ocean like, like, it’s a highway. It looks like the Long Island Expressway for ships, and they’re all heading to Texas. Louisiana. We’ve made up this. And that’s why when I — when I decided that I have to do this for the good of the world, not just the United States, in a way, we would have been in less trouble than a lot of other places. Certainly, the Middle East would have been blown up. There wouldn’t be a Middle East anymore. They would have controlled. They would have taken over the Middle East. Now — now they’re trying to survive, and they won’t be successful unless they make a deal. They don’t make a deal. They won’t be successful. It’ll go very quickly and methodically. Believe me, it’ll be very easy. But we have so many alternatives. It’s amazing. And nobody knew this, you know, because as an example, Japan got 90 percent of their oil — or their — most of their energy, but most of their oil from the Hormuz Strait. South Korea got 43 percent of it, by the way, their ship was shot at. They were not in the cavalcade of ships they had. They decided to go it alone, and their ship got the hell knocked out of it yesterday. But they didn’t shoot the ships that were guarded by us, I’ll tell you that. We knocked down a lot of missiles. So, what happens is that we have a situation where we have total control. As you know, the blockade has been amazing. It’s like a piece of steel. Nobody’s going to challenge the blockade. And I think it’s working out very well. We’re going to see I can say this. Iran wants to make a deal. What I don’t like about Iran is they’ll talk to me with such great respect, and then they’ll go on television, they’ll say, we did not speak to the President. We did not. I just spoke to them. We did not speak to the President. So, they play games. But let me just tell you, they want to make a deal. And who wouldn’t? When your military is totally gone, we could do anything we want to them. Who wouldn’t?”

Gray TV’s Jon Decker: “Next week, you have a very important meeting with President Xi in Beijing. Secretary Bessent has said that a top priority on the agenda will be Iran. What do you hope to achieve with President Xi as it relates to Iran?” President Trump: “Well, I have a very good relationship with President Xi. You know, I find it to be a tremendous guy. And we get along well. And you see how we do. We’re doing a lot of business with China and making a lot of money. We’re making a lot of money. It’s different than it used to be. But I’ll be talking about it. That’ll be one subject. But he’s been very nice about this. You know, in all fairness, he gets like 60% of his oil from Hormuz. And he’s been — I think he’s been very respectful. We haven’t been challenged by China. They don’t challenge us, and he wouldn’t do that. I don’t think he’d do that because of me. But I think he’s been very respectful. And we’ve offered, you know, if he wants to send the ships to the United States — I think one of the big things that’s happened is I made a statement. Send your — send your ships to Texas. It’s not that much further. Send your ships to Louisiana. Send your ships to Alaska. Alaska is actually very close to a lot of the Asian countries. People don’t realize it. You know, Japan is back and forth. It’s like it doesn’t seem it, but it’s a very short route, two days shorter than almost any other route. We’re making tremendous big deals with South Korea and with Japan. But I said, send your ships. All of a sudden, I don’t know if you saw the graph today. And this is Space Force, which I created — Space Force has — they just sent out some photos of the ships that are lined up all the way down the ocean like, like, it’s a highway. It looks like the Long Island Expressway for ships, and they’re all heading to Texas. Louisiana. We’ve made up this. And that’s why when I — when I decided that I have to do this for the good of the world, not just the United States, in a way, we would have been in less trouble than a lot of other places. Certainly, the Middle East would have been blown up. There wouldn’t be a Middle East anymore. They would have controlled. They would have taken over the Middle East. Now — now they’re trying to survive, and they won’t be successful unless they make a deal. They don’t make a deal. They won’t be successful. It’ll go very quickly and methodically. Believe me, it’ll be very easy. But we have so many alternatives. It’s amazing. And nobody knew this, you know, because as an example, Japan got 90 percent of their oil — or their — most of their energy, but most of their oil from the Hormuz Strait. South Korea got 43 percent of it, by the way, their ship was shot at. They were not in the cavalcade of ships they had. They decided to go it alone, and their ship got the hell knocked out of it yesterday. But they didn’t shoot the ships that were guarded by us, I’ll tell you that. We knocked down a lot of missiles. So, what happens is that we have a situation where we have total control. As you know, the blockade has been amazing. It’s like a piece of steel. Nobody’s going to challenge the blockade. And I think it’s working out very well. We’re going to see I can say this. Iran wants to make a deal. What I don’t like about Iran is they’ll talk to me with such great respect, and then they’ll go on television, they’ll say, we did not speak to the President. We did not. I just spoke to them. We did not speak to the President. So, they play games. But let me just tell you, they want to make a deal. And who wouldn’t? When your military is totally gone, we could do anything we want to them. Who wouldn’t?”

Curtis Houck

18,205 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump reveals despite Turkey's poor relationship with Israel, they likely REFUSED to get involved in the Iran war because of 47 STRENGTH! "They could have gotten into the fight. You know, I hear some people saying about their relationship with Israel. They could have gotten into the fight. They're a very powerful military nation. They didn't do that!" "Maybe they didn't do that because of me, but they could have gotten into the fight on the other side. They are a nation that's been very, very good."

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump reveals despite Turkey's poor relationship with Israel, they likely REFUSED to get involved in the Iran war because of 47 STRENGTH! "They could have gotten into the fight. You know, I hear some people saying about their relationship with Israel. They could have gotten into the fight. They're a very powerful military nation. They didn't do that!" "Maybe they didn't do that because of me, but they could have gotten into the fight on the other side. They are a nation that's been very, very good."

Eric Daugherty

171,086 views • 1 month ago

“‘Red Rain’ is one of my favourite tracks from that record [‘So’]. It’s a good example of a band playing together with a lot of energy and again, I think from Daniel Lanois’ input, there’s a respect for the moment. So many times in studios you see people desperately trying to get the best possible sound, but they let the moment go because they want to get something right or fixed, or they know that this bit can be improved, but the moment is something instinctively that you feel and if you get that great performance everything else will bow to it. And you can fix a lot of things afterwards. But, if you get the best sound but you don’t get the great performance, you have nothing. And it’s so easy to forget that in the studio.” - PG

“‘Red Rain’ is one of my favourite tracks from that record [‘So’]. It’s a good example of a band playing together with a lot of energy and again, I think from Daniel Lanois’ input, there’s a respect for the moment. So many times in studios you see people desperately trying to get the best possible sound, but they let the moment go because they want to get something right or fixed, or they know that this bit can be improved, but the moment is something instinctively that you feel and if you get that great performance everything else will bow to it. And you can fix a lot of things afterwards. But, if you get the best sound but you don’t get the great performance, you have nothing. And it’s so easy to forget that in the studio.” - PG

Peter Gabriel

89,226 views • 2 years ago

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

22,300 views • 5 months ago

.The Daily Signal’s Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell: “Mr. President, are you encouraging our allies in the Gulf to be more involved in the Iran operation?” President Trump “Say it.” Trump: “Are you encouraging our allies in the Gulf to be more involved in the Iran operation?” Trump: “Yeah, I mean, a little bit, but more — more NATO. I think our Gulf allies have been pretty good, to be honest with you. UAE has been hit so hard. I think they got hit by 1,400 rockets, shot them all out of the air with our great — with our great Patriot missiles. Think of it. They shot 100 missiles at one of our aircraft carriers, the Abraham Lincoln, one of the biggest ships in the world, actually. And out of 101 missiles shot, every single one of them was knocked down in the sea. Think of that. Think of what that means. 101 missiles. Highly sophisticated, very fast missile shot — out of 101, all 101 were shot down. And now, for the most part, lie at the bottom of the sea. Pretty amazing, right? Pretty amazing. Our military is amazing. Pete, you know the attack I’m talking about recently, 101 shot. I said, wow, I saw that. You can see we have sort of pretty good equipment that we see. It’s called the red line. Those red lines were thick, right? I said, that’s a lot. And then we saw them one by one, just get shot. And these guys who do the shooting, the coolest cucumbers ever, you know, most people, you don’t have a lot of time when a missile is going at 2,500 miles an hour, I don’t care how far away it is. You don’t have a lot of time. But I watched them — I watched them sit down and think. Great students. MIT’s a lot of — MIT’s a lot of guys like this, and not as much into the muscle as they are this one right here and amazing to watch them perform under great pressure because they have a matter of seconds to do it. If they don’t do it properly, it’s a big problem, you know, because these were powerful — these were very powerful missiles coming. And so, a lot of people choke. They don’t choke. These guys don’t choke. They’re the best in the world. We have the best in the world.”

.The Daily Signal’s Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell: “Mr. President, are you encouraging our allies in the Gulf to be more involved in the Iran operation?” President Trump “Say it.” Trump: “Are you encouraging our allies in the Gulf to be more involved in the Iran operation?” Trump: “Yeah, I mean, a little bit, but more — more NATO. I think our Gulf allies have been pretty good, to be honest with you. UAE has been hit so hard. I think they got hit by 1,400 rockets, shot them all out of the air with our great — with our great Patriot missiles. Think of it. They shot 100 missiles at one of our aircraft carriers, the Abraham Lincoln, one of the biggest ships in the world, actually. And out of 101 missiles shot, every single one of them was knocked down in the sea. Think of that. Think of what that means. 101 missiles. Highly sophisticated, very fast missile shot — out of 101, all 101 were shot down. And now, for the most part, lie at the bottom of the sea. Pretty amazing, right? Pretty amazing. Our military is amazing. Pete, you know the attack I’m talking about recently, 101 shot. I said, wow, I saw that. You can see we have sort of pretty good equipment that we see. It’s called the red line. Those red lines were thick, right? I said, that’s a lot. And then we saw them one by one, just get shot. And these guys who do the shooting, the coolest cucumbers ever, you know, most people, you don’t have a lot of time when a missile is going at 2,500 miles an hour, I don’t care how far away it is. You don’t have a lot of time. But I watched them — I watched them sit down and think. Great students. MIT’s a lot of — MIT’s a lot of guys like this, and not as much into the muscle as they are this one right here and amazing to watch them perform under great pressure because they have a matter of seconds to do it. If they don’t do it properly, it’s a big problem, you know, because these were powerful — these were very powerful missiles coming. And so, a lot of people choke. They don’t choke. These guys don’t choke. They’re the best in the world. We have the best in the world.”

Curtis Houck

49,286 views • 5 months ago

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

Curtis Houck

51,169 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump MIC DROPS a reporter in the Oval Office REPORTER: You're facing an opponent right now in Iran that has refused to submit. TRUMP: "Why do YOU say they refused to submit? You don't know that! You don't know what's going on." REPORTER: "A few days ago..." TRUMP: "It's a long time ago. You know, in the world of war, a few days ago, no, they want to make a deal badly. And we'll see if we get there." "If we get there, they can't have nuclear weapons. You know, it's very simple. But what's not to submit? So they had a Navy with one hundred and fifty nine ships and now every ship is blown to pieces and lying at the bottom of the water." "They had an air force, lots of planes, and they don't have any planes. They don't have any anti aircraft. They don't have any radar left." "Their missiles are mostly decimated. They have some. They have probably 18, 19 percent, but not a lot by comparison to what they had." "And their leaders are all dead. So I think we won. Now it's only a question of, look, if we left right now around, it would take them 20 years to rebuild!"

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump MIC DROPS a reporter in the Oval Office REPORTER: You're facing an opponent right now in Iran that has refused to submit. TRUMP: "Why do YOU say they refused to submit? You don't know that! You don't know what's going on." REPORTER: "A few days ago..." TRUMP: "It's a long time ago. You know, in the world of war, a few days ago, no, they want to make a deal badly. And we'll see if we get there." "If we get there, they can't have nuclear weapons. You know, it's very simple. But what's not to submit? So they had a Navy with one hundred and fifty nine ships and now every ship is blown to pieces and lying at the bottom of the water." "They had an air force, lots of planes, and they don't have any planes. They don't have any anti aircraft. They don't have any radar left." "Their missiles are mostly decimated. They have some. They have probably 18, 19 percent, but not a lot by comparison to what they had." "And their leaders are all dead. So I think we won. Now it's only a question of, look, if we left right now around, it would take them 20 years to rebuild!"

Eric Daugherty

764,345 views • 3 months ago

Trump on the Nobel Peace Prize: I think it’s been a major embarrassment to Norway. I don’t know what Norway has to do with it, but that’s where the committee is located. A lot of Norwegian people. And it’s been a very big embarrassment to the country of Norway. Whether they have anything to do with it or not, I think they do. They say they don’t.

Trump on the Nobel Peace Prize: I think it’s been a major embarrassment to Norway. I don’t know what Norway has to do with it, but that’s where the committee is located. A lot of Norwegian people. And it’s been a very big embarrassment to the country of Norway. Whether they have anything to do with it or not, I think they do. They say they don’t.

Clash Report

16,394 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On the situation in Iran, US President Donald Trump says, "... I have a plan for everything, but we will see what happens. They should have made the deal. I had a great deal for them. We talked about it for 60 days, and in the end, they decided not to do it, and now they wish they had. It's late to meet, but they want to, and they want to come to the White House. I may do that... Anything could happen... I have a meeting in the war room in a while. We are in the midst of something terrible. I hate to see so much death and destruction... I have ideas as to what I could do, but they are not final. I like to finalise one second before it's due. Things change. Especially with war..." Source: US Network Pool via Reuters

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On the situation in Iran, US President Donald Trump says, "... I have a plan for everything, but we will see what happens. They should have made the deal. I had a great deal for them. We talked about it for 60 days, and in the end, they decided not to do it, and now they wish they had. It's late to meet, but they want to, and they want to come to the White House. I may do that... Anything could happen... I have a meeting in the war room in a while. We are in the midst of something terrible. I hate to see so much death and destruction... I have ideas as to what I could do, but they are not final. I like to finalise one second before it's due. Things change. Especially with war..." Source: US Network Pool via Reuters

ANI

89,499 views • 1 year ago

Cooper Flagg on the fan energy now compared to earlier in the season: “I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. So I think that it’s part of it, and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. And I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up in the fourth quarters and be into it and giving them more wins, I think we might look at it a little differently, so, I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that, but the fans have been there, they stepped up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive, so I just want to look forward and try to continue to give them things to be positive for…I’m just glad they show up for us.”

Cooper Flagg on the fan energy now compared to earlier in the season: “I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. So I think that it’s part of it, and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. And I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up in the fourth quarters and be into it and giving them more wins, I think we might look at it a little differently, so, I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that, but the fans have been there, they stepped up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive, so I just want to look forward and try to continue to give them things to be positive for…I’m just glad they show up for us.”

Noah Weber

67,240 views • 9 months ago

Nick Fuentes says Israel is trapping the United States in the war with Iran. “And they will fight this war to the last American. Israel will fight their war with Iran to the last American, to the last gallon of oil, to last barrel of oil, gallon of gas. That’s what this is.” “What does Israel want in the conflict? Israel wants regime change. They’re not going home without it.” “They’re drawing us further in. They want Americans to die. They want us to up the ante so that we get further stuck.”

Nick Fuentes says Israel is trapping the United States in the war with Iran. “And they will fight this war to the last American. Israel will fight their war with Iran to the last American, to the last gallon of oil, to last barrel of oil, gallon of gas. That’s what this is.” “What does Israel want in the conflict? Israel wants regime change. They’re not going home without it.” “They’re drawing us further in. They want Americans to die. They want us to up the ante so that we get further stuck.”

Fractured Light

38,787 views • 4 months ago

I have so much respect for police and law-enforcement. Not only do they risk their lives every single day they leave the house, but they have to deal with the most ridiculous stuff!

I have so much respect for police and law-enforcement. Not only do they risk their lives every single day they leave the house, but they have to deal with the most ridiculous stuff!

AmericanPapaBear™

15,828 views • 4 months ago

Brianna Lyman: “Actually there was a report in The New York Times and they interviewed an engineer from Tehran, and what he said was interesting. He said that a lot of people in Tehran, in Iran actually don't necessarily want the bombs to stop dropping because if the bombs stop dropping it means that the Iranian regime currently in place is still in place. And for them they said we are thought of as human shields for the Iranian regime so we want this regime gone.” “Of course, bombings are horrible especially when they accidentally kill young girls. That is absolutely tragic and awful. But I do think the Iranian people see this as a risk calculation...”

Brianna Lyman: “Actually there was a report in The New York Times and they interviewed an engineer from Tehran, and what he said was interesting. He said that a lot of people in Tehran, in Iran actually don't necessarily want the bombs to stop dropping because if the bombs stop dropping it means that the Iranian regime currently in place is still in place. And for them they said we are thought of as human shields for the Iranian regime so we want this regime gone.” “Of course, bombings are horrible especially when they accidentally kill young girls. That is absolutely tragic and awful. But I do think the Iranian people see this as a risk calculation...”

RedWave Press

651,449 views • 5 months ago

President Trump wasn’t having it after a European reporter tried to argue that the Iran conflict has become a “strategic dead end” for the United States. Trump completely completely dismantles his entire premise. REPORTER: “The Iran war seems to be a strategic dead end for you. Why are you apparently unable to end the Iran war?” TRUMP: “So I think we’re doing just the opposite.” “The Iran war has been a tremendous military success.” “And, you know, I can only answer the question by saying they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.” “I was there for one reason, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I call it… denuclearize Iran, and that’s happened. They will never have a nuclear weapon.” “That stuff is so far down under a mountain. It’s a granite mountain that collapsed on top of it. It’ll take months to get it out. I think it’s a tremendous success.” “And you see the oil prices are lower than they were when I started.” “They have no military left. Their air force is gone. Their ships are gone. Their radar is gone. Everything’s gone.” “So when you say not a success, it’s a tremendous success.” “The fake news likes to say how well they’re doing. They’re doing terribly.” “They want to make a deal, but they don’t know how to make a deal. And then they go around shooting ships at night. I don’t like that.”

President Trump wasn’t having it after a European reporter tried to argue that the Iran conflict has become a “strategic dead end” for the United States. Trump completely completely dismantles his entire premise. REPORTER: “The Iran war seems to be a strategic dead end for you. Why are you apparently unable to end the Iran war?” TRUMP: “So I think we’re doing just the opposite.” “The Iran war has been a tremendous military success.” “And, you know, I can only answer the question by saying they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.” “I was there for one reason, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I call it… denuclearize Iran, and that’s happened. They will never have a nuclear weapon.” “That stuff is so far down under a mountain. It’s a granite mountain that collapsed on top of it. It’ll take months to get it out. I think it’s a tremendous success.” “And you see the oil prices are lower than they were when I started.” “They have no military left. Their air force is gone. Their ships are gone. Their radar is gone. Everything’s gone.” “So when you say not a success, it’s a tremendous success.” “The fake news likes to say how well they’re doing. They’re doing terribly.” “They want to make a deal, but they don’t know how to make a deal. And then they go around shooting ships at night. I don’t like that.”

Overton

265,903 views • 1 month ago

President Trump on negotiations with Iran: “I mean, the problem with the issue of the Hormuz Straits is this: We've decimated them as a military. No air force, no navy, very few rockets left. We blew up so many. Hard to manufacture them. Same thing with drones. The leadership is gone. The problem with the Straits is this: Let's say we do a great job. We say we got 99%. 1% is unacceptable, because 1% is a missile going into the hull of a ship that cost a billion dollars, right? So 1% is not... If we do a 99% decimation, that's no good. So it's really, you know... I have a feeling it's going to clean up pretty quickly. I could just say this. They want to make -- they want to make -- and I probably hurt our little negotiation. It gives them a little impetus to say, ‘Well, I wish you didn't say that.’ But they said yesterday that we weren't negotiating with them, and now they admit that we were negotiating with them. So they want to make a deal. The reason they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to shit.”

President Trump on negotiations with Iran: “I mean, the problem with the issue of the Hormuz Straits is this: We've decimated them as a military. No air force, no navy, very few rockets left. We blew up so many. Hard to manufacture them. Same thing with drones. The leadership is gone. The problem with the Straits is this: Let's say we do a great job. We say we got 99%. 1% is unacceptable, because 1% is a missile going into the hull of a ship that cost a billion dollars, right? So 1% is not... If we do a 99% decimation, that's no good. So it's really, you know... I have a feeling it's going to clean up pretty quickly. I could just say this. They want to make -- they want to make -- and I probably hurt our little negotiation. It gives them a little impetus to say, ‘Well, I wish you didn't say that.’ But they said yesterday that we weren't negotiating with them, and now they admit that we were negotiating with them. So they want to make a deal. The reason they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to shit.”

OSINTdefender

938,788 views • 5 months ago

EXCLUSIVE: Would an attack in Iran manage to overthrow the current regime? U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham tells Channel 14's Lital Shemesh: "The goal is to weaken the regime further so that the people can take over." "I think the risk of supporting regime change, helping the people if far less than the risk of pulling the plug - promising relief, and it never showed up. That's generational damage. So can they hit our bases? Yes. Is the risk worth it? Yes." ליטל שמש - Lital Shemesh Lindsey Graham

EXCLUSIVE: Would an attack in Iran manage to overthrow the current regime? U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham tells Channel 14's Lital Shemesh: "The goal is to weaken the regime further so that the people can take over." "I think the risk of supporting regime change, helping the people if far less than the risk of pulling the plug - promising relief, and it never showed up. That's generational damage. So can they hit our bases? Yes. Is the risk worth it? Yes." ליטל שמש - Lital Shemesh Lindsey Graham

C14 News Israel | EN

59,164 views • 6 months ago