Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🔥 "[Senior-Trump-administration officials] are very serious and under serious pressure from the White House to get out, literally, as much as possible [on UFOs]." ~Mellon 🔥 (New! - I'm getting a little excited again, but let's see if it happens.) Christopher K. Mellon: "I've also, like [Grusch], heard from...

TheUfoJoe's profile picture

Joe Murgia

115,556 subscribers

47,821 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Senior Trump Administration officials tell Chris Mellon the White House wants to release as many UFO files as possible “They are under serious pressure from the White House… It was a very encouraging message from people associated with the Admin who are working the problem.”
0:30

Senior Trump Administration officials tell Chris Mellon the White House wants to release as many UFO files as possible “They are under serious pressure from the White House… It was a very encouraging message from people associated with the Admin who are working the problem.”

UAP James

52,785 views • 3 months ago

Mellon knows people who believe 100% that the USG and/or its contractors have materials and craft from a non-human intelligence. But, he also knows this... "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus." ~Christopher K. Mellon in Barcelona (People like to ignore this from Mellon but I won't. I shared similar comments from him at this same conference back when he said it but the post did crappy because a lot of people just want info. that will confirm their beliefs. As Rizwan Virk said, it would be interesting to see what Mellon thinks today, as this was in the fall of 2022, before Grusch went public. Obviously, Mellon knew about Grusch when he made these comments.) Mellon: "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus, they think it's rubbish. And, uhhh, and, you know, much less disclosure. And I'm talking about very, very senior people who have access to a lot of information. And they're saying, in some cases, to the people on The Hill, 'What are you talking about?' And, you know, 'Show us the evidence.' And, you know, they're mystified, still. "So, the UFO community, of which I'm a part, I guess, but you know, we have a tendency to see and hear, you know, one side of the story in our own stuff. And there's a lot of conspiracy theories because the government has lied and concealed information, and all of those things. The conspiracy theories grow in darkness, right? "But, to the best of my knowledge, the federal government is not in charge of running, it doesn't have any big plan, and disclosure is not imminent. If it does happen, it'll be the result of the efforts of people in Congress right now, and people who are taking action. And a small number of people who may have this information, if they come forward."
1:22

Mellon knows people who believe 100% that the USG and/or its contractors have materials and craft from a non-human intelligence. But, he also knows this... "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus." ~Christopher K. Mellon in Barcelona (People like to ignore this from Mellon but I won't. I shared similar comments from him at this same conference back when he said it but the post did crappy because a lot of people just want info. that will confirm their beliefs. As Rizwan Virk said, it would be interesting to see what Mellon thinks today, as this was in the fall of 2022, before Grusch went public. Obviously, Mellon knew about Grusch when he made these comments.) Mellon: "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus, they think it's rubbish. And, uhhh, and, you know, much less disclosure. And I'm talking about very, very senior people who have access to a lot of information. And they're saying, in some cases, to the people on The Hill, 'What are you talking about?' And, you know, 'Show us the evidence.' And, you know, they're mystified, still. "So, the UFO community, of which I'm a part, I guess, but you know, we have a tendency to see and hear, you know, one side of the story in our own stuff. And there's a lot of conspiracy theories because the government has lied and concealed information, and all of those things. The conspiracy theories grow in darkness, right? "But, to the best of my knowledge, the federal government is not in charge of running, it doesn't have any big plan, and disclosure is not imminent. If it does happen, it'll be the result of the efforts of people in Congress right now, and people who are taking action. And a small number of people who may have this information, if they come forward."

Joe Murgia

23,587 views • 3 months ago

"Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that." ~Mellon Whistleblowers, Fear and Mellon Calls Out Congress (This is all you know to need to know about why we're stuck in the mud with Disclosure. As I said yesterday, Congress is dragging ass. And, as I (and others) have repeatedly stated: We need protection for whistleblowers.) Kurt McConnell - Former Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer: "The key to this, in my opinion, is firsthand sources who can testify to direct involvement in the so-called Legacy program of crash retrievals, reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there are people out there, I believe, from many reports, that are interested in coming forward and telling their story, but they are very much intimidated and frightened about doing that. They're afraid of the consequences, including their own personal safety, is what they relate. Their personal safety, certainly their career, starting with their security clearances, which is the means that they have to make a living. And they have observed some folks who have come forward - not to mention you, Lue, and Dave Grusch - and have seen what those folks have gone through, and most of them say, 'Yeah, I'm not doing that.' "So, I think we're sort of in a tough situation. It's almost like Catch 22. We need more primary sources. But it's hard to get people with that kind of information to come forward because of the fear of retaliation." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office: "We need a better whistleblower protection." McConnell: "Sir, that's something that I'm sure, as you know, has been discussed in both the Senate and the House." Burchett: "Why don't you draw me something up, really tight." McConnell: "Yes, sir. So, whistleblower protections and finding ways to even compensate them if they do have negative consequences from coming forward, and so forth. So, I certainly think this is a major factor." Christopher K. Mellon: "I came prepared to contribute what I could to that question as well but the classified session was canceled, I think, due to the sensitivity of the names of the individuals and so forth. I didn't think it was appropriate to (hard to make out his words here) to do it in an unclassified setting. If they do reschedule the classified setting, I think I'm more than happy to try to provide some very specifics. "I published a Signal message I received from a very senior government official. He described a specific Secretary-of-the-Air-Force memorandum. He described a specific recovery site. He named the Air Force gatekeeper for the program. Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that. I have all that information. I was prepared to share what I could about that but I don't that it would be definitive or lead to any conclusion. But I do think those names, due to the privacy concerns of the individuals and so forth, obviously that's pretty sensitive, so..." Read the Signal message here:
4:02

"Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that." ~Mellon Whistleblowers, Fear and Mellon Calls Out Congress (This is all you know to need to know about why we're stuck in the mud with Disclosure. As I said yesterday, Congress is dragging ass. And, as I (and others) have repeatedly stated: We need protection for whistleblowers.) Kurt McConnell - Former Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer: "The key to this, in my opinion, is firsthand sources who can testify to direct involvement in the so-called Legacy program of crash retrievals, reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there are people out there, I believe, from many reports, that are interested in coming forward and telling their story, but they are very much intimidated and frightened about doing that. They're afraid of the consequences, including their own personal safety, is what they relate. Their personal safety, certainly their career, starting with their security clearances, which is the means that they have to make a living. And they have observed some folks who have come forward - not to mention you, Lue, and Dave Grusch - and have seen what those folks have gone through, and most of them say, 'Yeah, I'm not doing that.' "So, I think we're sort of in a tough situation. It's almost like Catch 22. We need more primary sources. But it's hard to get people with that kind of information to come forward because of the fear of retaliation." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office: "We need a better whistleblower protection." McConnell: "Sir, that's something that I'm sure, as you know, has been discussed in both the Senate and the House." Burchett: "Why don't you draw me something up, really tight." McConnell: "Yes, sir. So, whistleblower protections and finding ways to even compensate them if they do have negative consequences from coming forward, and so forth. So, I certainly think this is a major factor." Christopher K. Mellon: "I came prepared to contribute what I could to that question as well but the classified session was canceled, I think, due to the sensitivity of the names of the individuals and so forth. I didn't think it was appropriate to (hard to make out his words here) to do it in an unclassified setting. If they do reschedule the classified setting, I think I'm more than happy to try to provide some very specifics. "I published a Signal message I received from a very senior government official. He described a specific Secretary-of-the-Air-Force memorandum. He described a specific recovery site. He named the Air Force gatekeeper for the program. Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that. I have all that information. I was prepared to share what I could about that but I don't that it would be definitive or lead to any conclusion. But I do think those names, due to the privacy concerns of the individuals and so forth, obviously that's pretty sensitive, so..." Read the Signal message here:

Joe Murgia

17,539 views • 1 year ago

"i have to say that i'm very emotional because i remember very well in 2023, seeing photos, because i wasn't here, how much it broke my heart to see this region that i love so much and where i've spent so much time, also as a ferrari driver, with such huge damage. but one thing that i saw was that you were all super united in a very difficult moment, and that touched me a lot. i also remember that yuki was there, helping out on the streets, which also really impressed me. and today i'm truly happy to see you all here in a very different environment from those photos, and i really hope that this facility will live on in the best possible way, with children and families, and i'm truly happy to see you all here together. i'm happy to have left a small mark in a region that is very dear to me, but you are the heroes who went through a very difficult period, surely, and the respect goes more to you than to what i did. but thank you anyway for the welcome, and i hope to see you again at the end of the year." 🤍🤍🤍🤍
1:50

"i have to say that i'm very emotional because i remember very well in 2023, seeing photos, because i wasn't here, how much it broke my heart to see this region that i love so much and where i've spent so much time, also as a ferrari driver, with such huge damage. but one thing that i saw was that you were all super united in a very difficult moment, and that touched me a lot. i also remember that yuki was there, helping out on the streets, which also really impressed me. and today i'm truly happy to see you all here in a very different environment from those photos, and i really hope that this facility will live on in the best possible way, with children and families, and i'm truly happy to see you all here together. i'm happy to have left a small mark in a region that is very dear to me, but you are the heroes who went through a very difficult period, surely, and the respect goes more to you than to what i did. but thank you anyway for the welcome, and i hope to see you again at the end of the year." 🤍🤍🤍🤍

clara

100,031 views • 7 days ago

The left is truly sick and deranged... Read this sickos post and compare with what Trump actually said... Donald Trump, 9/13/2001 "[NBC Reporter] Now just a few moments ago Donald Trump passed through here, so we had a minute to talk with him Let's roll that tape. [Donald Trump] You can see what he had to say Well, I've never seen anything like it I've seen two huge hundred and ten story buildings that are reduced to rubble Thousands and thousands of lives. I just got to see something that I've never seen before I have hundreds of men inside working right now, and we're bringing down another hundred and twenty five in a little while And they've never done work like this before and they're hard-working people, but they've never seen anything like it And they've never they've never done work like this before. It's terrible. [NBC Reporter] Tell me what it's like at ground zero Tell me about the workers that you saw and and what they're doing there [Donald Trump] Well, not only is it devastation But it's very dangerous because every few minutes a whistle would go off and everybody would just run because you have all the buildings around It which are in such a weakened state that people just don't know and so they just have to take off and then they come Back and they're working under 50 story buildings that you don't know if they're gonna fall down So it's a terrible thing for the workers and it's a terrible thing for the world. [NBC Reporter] Really How have you spoken to any of your men? [Donald Trump] Do you know how they're reacting to this because emotionally this must be so incredibly difficult Well, there are a lot of them, but they've never seen bodies like this I mean the bodies all over the I mean the the great thing is when they find somebody that's alive like the five Firemen that they just found a little while ago. So that's the great thing and that's what they're all striving for But generally speaking that's not what the case that's not the case So they are working very very hard But it's it's a very depressing situation for these folks as you walked around and as you saw the piles of rubble [NBC Reporter] There are thousands of families out there Who are hoping that someone might be in a pocket somewhere still alive still breathing waiting to be dug up as you assess that damage From your perspective. Do you believe that's possible? [Donald Trump] Well, I would certainly not want to be the one to say it's not possible. Certainly. It's It's a tough situation, but you can't give up hope because there's always hope I mean the five men I'm sure their Families thought that they probably were gone and now they walk in the door a couple of them walked away after they were dug out So there probably are some more people in there and therefore you can't give up hope You've had an impact on the skyline of New York. [NBC Reporter] What is it like as you see it now? [Donald Trump] It's like a whole different skyline. It's like a whole different city and world I cannot believe the site of lower, Manhattan without the World Trade Center And therefore we have to rebuild not necessarily in that form, but we have to rebuild at least as good and maybe better Just finally, can you tell me emotionally as you walked around? [NBC Reporter] We've we've heard some of the stories from the firemen They're so exhausted and and mentally and physically. What was it like for you personally to go in and see all of what you saw? [Donald Trump] Well, it was amazing to see it. It was a very depressing scene But I'll tell you what you really can take heart these firemen and policemen and the construction workers equally the courage they have is Unbelievable. I mean they're working digging out and lifting up steel and above them You have 55 story buildings that are very possibly going to be pouring down on them any minute and they're working like nothing's wrong I mean, it's they're amazing
3:07

The left is truly sick and deranged... Read this sickos post and compare with what Trump actually said... Donald Trump, 9/13/2001 "[NBC Reporter] Now just a few moments ago Donald Trump passed through here, so we had a minute to talk with him Let's roll that tape. [Donald Trump] You can see what he had to say Well, I've never seen anything like it I've seen two huge hundred and ten story buildings that are reduced to rubble Thousands and thousands of lives. I just got to see something that I've never seen before I have hundreds of men inside working right now, and we're bringing down another hundred and twenty five in a little while And they've never done work like this before and they're hard-working people, but they've never seen anything like it And they've never they've never done work like this before. It's terrible. [NBC Reporter] Tell me what it's like at ground zero Tell me about the workers that you saw and and what they're doing there [Donald Trump] Well, not only is it devastation But it's very dangerous because every few minutes a whistle would go off and everybody would just run because you have all the buildings around It which are in such a weakened state that people just don't know and so they just have to take off and then they come Back and they're working under 50 story buildings that you don't know if they're gonna fall down So it's a terrible thing for the workers and it's a terrible thing for the world. [NBC Reporter] Really How have you spoken to any of your men? [Donald Trump] Do you know how they're reacting to this because emotionally this must be so incredibly difficult Well, there are a lot of them, but they've never seen bodies like this I mean the bodies all over the I mean the the great thing is when they find somebody that's alive like the five Firemen that they just found a little while ago. So that's the great thing and that's what they're all striving for But generally speaking that's not what the case that's not the case So they are working very very hard But it's it's a very depressing situation for these folks as you walked around and as you saw the piles of rubble [NBC Reporter] There are thousands of families out there Who are hoping that someone might be in a pocket somewhere still alive still breathing waiting to be dug up as you assess that damage From your perspective. Do you believe that's possible? [Donald Trump] Well, I would certainly not want to be the one to say it's not possible. Certainly. It's It's a tough situation, but you can't give up hope because there's always hope I mean the five men I'm sure their Families thought that they probably were gone and now they walk in the door a couple of them walked away after they were dug out So there probably are some more people in there and therefore you can't give up hope You've had an impact on the skyline of New York. [NBC Reporter] What is it like as you see it now? [Donald Trump] It's like a whole different skyline. It's like a whole different city and world I cannot believe the site of lower, Manhattan without the World Trade Center And therefore we have to rebuild not necessarily in that form, but we have to rebuild at least as good and maybe better Just finally, can you tell me emotionally as you walked around? [NBC Reporter] We've we've heard some of the stories from the firemen They're so exhausted and and mentally and physically. What was it like for you personally to go in and see all of what you saw? [Donald Trump] Well, it was amazing to see it. It was a very depressing scene But I'll tell you what you really can take heart these firemen and policemen and the construction workers equally the courage they have is Unbelievable. I mean they're working digging out and lifting up steel and above them You have 55 story buildings that are very possibly going to be pouring down on them any minute and they're working like nothing's wrong I mean, it's they're amazing

Apple Lamps

184,187 views • 15 days ago

🚨THE SOUND WAS VERY BAD, BUT I DID MY BEST TO DECIPHER THE OPENING REMARKS OF TRUMP AND ZELENSKYY: Q: President Trump, do you think Putin is serious about peace this time? TRUMP: I do. I do. I think he is. I think they both are. Q: What was your message to Putin? TRUMP: You got to make a deal. Got to get it done. Too many people dying and I think both presidents want to make a deal. I really do. I made a brief phone call. Q: Do you meet Putin again soon? TRUMP: It depends. It depends. But I do believe that we have the makings of a deal that's good for Ukraine, good for everybody and that's very important. "There's nothing more important", - my book. We settled eight wars and this is the most difficult one. I thought it would be in the middle of the pack. This, this is the most difficult one, but we're gonna get it done. We're gonna have a great meeting today. This gentleman has worked very hard, and is very brave, and his people are very brave. I mean, what they've gone through, no nation... very rarely a nation ever had to go through this. So, we're gonna have a very good meeting today, I think. And I'm also calling President Putin back after the meeting and we'll continue our negotiation. Pretty complex, but not that complex. Q: Do you expect any deadline? TRUMP: I don't have deadlines. I have... You know what my deadline is? Getting the war ended. We don't have deadlines, do you agree with that? ZELENSKYY: yes... finish, as quick as possible Q: Are you prepared to sign the security agreement today? TRUMP: Well, it depends what the security agreement says. What a dumb question. Nobody even knows what the security agreement is going to say. But there will be a security agreement. It'll be a strong agreement, and the European nations are very much involved in that. They'll be very much involved in protection, et cetera. But the European nations have been really great. They're very much in line with this meeting and getting a deal done. They are all in... They're terrific people. I think you can say that. There's no, nobody there. They all want to get it done and they've been very supportive, I think. President, do you have anything to say? ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much Mr. President. Thank you for this meeting. Thank you for your invitation. Yes, really, I agree with President. Our teams, they do what they can. And I think that during last month, they moved forward with negotiations and Americans... thank you very much for your team, Steve and Jared, they worked very well. They worked on different documents. I hope that all these documents can bring peace as soon as possible. And, I agree with president that really the Europeans were very supportive. The president is on the contact with them, and maybe we will have the phone contact with them. TRUMP: We can call them, today Q: Why did you want to meet with President at Mar-a-Lago today? ZELENSKYY: Why? So we have... we spoke with our teams. They worked on 20 points plan. Then they worked on prosperity and security document. And 20 points plan is very important to discuss and sequencing that. It's very important. Our teams talked about the strategy, how to take step by step and to bring peace closer. And we will discuss this strategy. Q: President Zelenskyy, are you gonna make territorial concessions? ZELENSKYY: When we speak about 20 points plan, there is... They are, in 20 points plan, - 90% by the way, was done by our two teams, - I think they made a great job, great work. And yes, we will discuss these points also. TRUMP: And there are great economic benefits for Ukraine also, cause you know, there's a lot of rebuilding to do and there's a lot of wealth to be had. And they have great wealth, potentially they have great wealth. They wanna get started. But there is great economic benefit for Ukraine in what we're talking about. Q: President Trump, some are saying that the recent attacks in the past couple days, that Russia has staged against Ukraine, shows that President Putin isn't serious about peace. What is your reaction to that? TRUMP: No, he's very serious. I can say that I believe Ukraine has made some very strong attacks also. And I don't say that negatively. I think he'd probably have to. I don't say that negatively, you understand that? (to Zelenskyy) I think, now he hasn't told me that, but there have been some explosions in various parts of Russia, and it looks to me like, I don't know, I don't think it came from the Congo. I don't think it came from the United States of America. It possibly came from Ukraine, but I haven't asked that question. Maybe I won't bother asking. You know they're fighting a war and we'll see what happens. But I believe it's a war that... and we have two willing parties, we have two willing countries, they wanna see it end. Look, the people of Ukraine want it to end, and the people of Russia want it to end, and the two leaders want it to end. Q: Regarding the economic benefits for Ukraine: Europe is holding some billions of frozen Russian assets. Do you believe that should go to help rebuild Ukraine or go back to Russia again? TRUMP: None of that's been determined. But it'll go, it's gonna go very quickly. I think we're very, we're in final stages of talking and we're gonna see. Otherwise, it's gonna go on for a long time. It'll either end or it's gonna go on for a long time and millions of additional people are gonna be killed. Millions. And nobody wants that. Q: Mr. President (Trump), are you expecting to get to an agreement today? TRUMP: I just think we can do, I think we can move very rapidly. I really feel that. We've spoken. I know you had dinner with Steve. Steve Wickoff and Jared have done a fantastic job. And everybody has. Marco has been incredible. The whole group has been, our group has been incredible. And Ukraine appreciates it, and Russia appreciates it. They both want to see it end, and we're gonna get it ended. Thank you very much, everybody. ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much. TRUMP: We'll see you, I think, at the end. But I do think we'll call Europe also, we're gonna speak to the European leaders. Thank you very much.
6:22

🚨THE SOUND WAS VERY BAD, BUT I DID MY BEST TO DECIPHER THE OPENING REMARKS OF TRUMP AND ZELENSKYY: Q: President Trump, do you think Putin is serious about peace this time? TRUMP: I do. I do. I think he is. I think they both are. Q: What was your message to Putin? TRUMP: You got to make a deal. Got to get it done. Too many people dying and I think both presidents want to make a deal. I really do. I made a brief phone call. Q: Do you meet Putin again soon? TRUMP: It depends. It depends. But I do believe that we have the makings of a deal that's good for Ukraine, good for everybody and that's very important. "There's nothing more important", - my book. We settled eight wars and this is the most difficult one. I thought it would be in the middle of the pack. This, this is the most difficult one, but we're gonna get it done. We're gonna have a great meeting today. This gentleman has worked very hard, and is very brave, and his people are very brave. I mean, what they've gone through, no nation... very rarely a nation ever had to go through this. So, we're gonna have a very good meeting today, I think. And I'm also calling President Putin back after the meeting and we'll continue our negotiation. Pretty complex, but not that complex. Q: Do you expect any deadline? TRUMP: I don't have deadlines. I have... You know what my deadline is? Getting the war ended. We don't have deadlines, do you agree with that? ZELENSKYY: yes... finish, as quick as possible Q: Are you prepared to sign the security agreement today? TRUMP: Well, it depends what the security agreement says. What a dumb question. Nobody even knows what the security agreement is going to say. But there will be a security agreement. It'll be a strong agreement, and the European nations are very much involved in that. They'll be very much involved in protection, et cetera. But the European nations have been really great. They're very much in line with this meeting and getting a deal done. They are all in... They're terrific people. I think you can say that. There's no, nobody there. They all want to get it done and they've been very supportive, I think. President, do you have anything to say? ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much Mr. President. Thank you for this meeting. Thank you for your invitation. Yes, really, I agree with President. Our teams, they do what they can. And I think that during last month, they moved forward with negotiations and Americans... thank you very much for your team, Steve and Jared, they worked very well. They worked on different documents. I hope that all these documents can bring peace as soon as possible. And, I agree with president that really the Europeans were very supportive. The president is on the contact with them, and maybe we will have the phone contact with them. TRUMP: We can call them, today Q: Why did you want to meet with President at Mar-a-Lago today? ZELENSKYY: Why? So we have... we spoke with our teams. They worked on 20 points plan. Then they worked on prosperity and security document. And 20 points plan is very important to discuss and sequencing that. It's very important. Our teams talked about the strategy, how to take step by step and to bring peace closer. And we will discuss this strategy. Q: President Zelenskyy, are you gonna make territorial concessions? ZELENSKYY: When we speak about 20 points plan, there is... They are, in 20 points plan, - 90% by the way, was done by our two teams, - I think they made a great job, great work. And yes, we will discuss these points also. TRUMP: And there are great economic benefits for Ukraine also, cause you know, there's a lot of rebuilding to do and there's a lot of wealth to be had. And they have great wealth, potentially they have great wealth. They wanna get started. But there is great economic benefit for Ukraine in what we're talking about. Q: President Trump, some are saying that the recent attacks in the past couple days, that Russia has staged against Ukraine, shows that President Putin isn't serious about peace. What is your reaction to that? TRUMP: No, he's very serious. I can say that I believe Ukraine has made some very strong attacks also. And I don't say that negatively. I think he'd probably have to. I don't say that negatively, you understand that? (to Zelenskyy) I think, now he hasn't told me that, but there have been some explosions in various parts of Russia, and it looks to me like, I don't know, I don't think it came from the Congo. I don't think it came from the United States of America. It possibly came from Ukraine, but I haven't asked that question. Maybe I won't bother asking. You know they're fighting a war and we'll see what happens. But I believe it's a war that... and we have two willing parties, we have two willing countries, they wanna see it end. Look, the people of Ukraine want it to end, and the people of Russia want it to end, and the two leaders want it to end. Q: Regarding the economic benefits for Ukraine: Europe is holding some billions of frozen Russian assets. Do you believe that should go to help rebuild Ukraine or go back to Russia again? TRUMP: None of that's been determined. But it'll go, it's gonna go very quickly. I think we're very, we're in final stages of talking and we're gonna see. Otherwise, it's gonna go on for a long time. It'll either end or it's gonna go on for a long time and millions of additional people are gonna be killed. Millions. And nobody wants that. Q: Mr. President (Trump), are you expecting to get to an agreement today? TRUMP: I just think we can do, I think we can move very rapidly. I really feel that. We've spoken. I know you had dinner with Steve. Steve Wickoff and Jared have done a fantastic job. And everybody has. Marco has been incredible. The whole group has been, our group has been incredible. And Ukraine appreciates it, and Russia appreciates it. They both want to see it end, and we're gonna get it ended. Thank you very much, everybody. ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much. TRUMP: We'll see you, I think, at the end. But I do think we'll call Europe also, we're gonna speak to the European leaders. Thank you very much.

Kateryna Lisunova

140,749 views • 8 months ago

Jake and Logan Paul coming to the Pentagon is the same act as Transgender Dylan Mulvany coming to the White House under Biden. This is as that was. An un-serious administration ruining America with the same tactics with different names. There are no democrats or republicans. There's just us and them. And for some reason they are terrified you won't go vote. Ask yourself why...
2:53

Jake and Logan Paul coming to the Pentagon is the same act as Transgender Dylan Mulvany coming to the White House under Biden. This is as that was. An un-serious administration ruining America with the same tactics with different names. There are no democrats or republicans. There's just us and them. And for some reason they are terrified you won't go vote. Ask yourself why...

Shipwreck

18,225 views • 2 days ago

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."
7:10

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."

Joe Murgia

31,404 views • 2 months ago

Ross Coulthart -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI” Source -Need To Know 🔗 in comments Ross -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI. I've had people from the intelligence community who have asserted flatly to me that they are Chinese or Russian drones. Bullshit. I don't believe it. And I'm calling that up, nobody. And I've really milked all my sources. Nobody I can find has any evidence at all to prove that these are foreign adversary drones. I don't even think they're drones. Whatever they are. I've spoken now to multiple people who've told me they've seen these objects morphing. I, I can't verify the authenticity of it, but I tweeted recently about one that was hovering over a house that somebody videoed, and it was literally, it looked like two airplane cockpits a little bit apart from each other. It looked like whatever the hologram was that was being generated, it hadn't quite worked. And it was hovering over a house and drifting very slowly in a particular direction and whatever that is, it's not a conventional aircraft. And it's interesting because I asked somebody about this at a relatively high level in the defense community just this week, and they said to me, Ross, if you were the US Air Force and the White House, would you want to admit that there are objects operating with total impunity over the continental United States that we can't track? We can't detect, we don't know where they're coming from or where they're going to. We don't know who's responsible for them, and more importantly, we can bring them down. Would you want to admit that? And the answer is no. And it's interesting because more and more, I think it's a bunch of A-type males in the US military who just can't bring themselves to admit that despite the expenditure of trillions of dollars, the security and defense and integrity of the national airspace of the United States cannot be guaranteed. That's the issue behind the drones, whatever they are, I suspect, yes, there have been some drones going up, and that's a matter of public record. Skywatcher, for example, reported that some of the objects that they saw were indeed sort of commercial drones that somebody was putting up. But they've also, as Jake told me yesterday, made it very clear that the objects that they were seeing included highly anomalous objects. And this is something that John and Jerry Tedesco have picked up with their Nightcrawler research laboratory. They've gone out and they've actually looked at these objects through their hyperspectral cameras and their other optical and sensor devices, and what they are recording is anomalous. So the big issue to me is not that these objects are anomalous, it's why is the United States government notably the Trump White House putting out a statement that is egregiously false and misleading and completely unsustainable in light of what Jake Barber has said. And in light of what New Jersey police and other military continue to say to me that these objects are anomalous. They're still there, they're still hovering, and whatever they are, they are not normal terrestrial vehicles.”
3:17

Ross Coulthart -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI” Source -Need To Know 🔗 in comments Ross -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI. I've had people from the intelligence community who have asserted flatly to me that they are Chinese or Russian drones. Bullshit. I don't believe it. And I'm calling that up, nobody. And I've really milked all my sources. Nobody I can find has any evidence at all to prove that these are foreign adversary drones. I don't even think they're drones. Whatever they are. I've spoken now to multiple people who've told me they've seen these objects morphing. I, I can't verify the authenticity of it, but I tweeted recently about one that was hovering over a house that somebody videoed, and it was literally, it looked like two airplane cockpits a little bit apart from each other. It looked like whatever the hologram was that was being generated, it hadn't quite worked. And it was hovering over a house and drifting very slowly in a particular direction and whatever that is, it's not a conventional aircraft. And it's interesting because I asked somebody about this at a relatively high level in the defense community just this week, and they said to me, Ross, if you were the US Air Force and the White House, would you want to admit that there are objects operating with total impunity over the continental United States that we can't track? We can't detect, we don't know where they're coming from or where they're going to. We don't know who's responsible for them, and more importantly, we can bring them down. Would you want to admit that? And the answer is no. And it's interesting because more and more, I think it's a bunch of A-type males in the US military who just can't bring themselves to admit that despite the expenditure of trillions of dollars, the security and defense and integrity of the national airspace of the United States cannot be guaranteed. That's the issue behind the drones, whatever they are, I suspect, yes, there have been some drones going up, and that's a matter of public record. Skywatcher, for example, reported that some of the objects that they saw were indeed sort of commercial drones that somebody was putting up. But they've also, as Jake told me yesterday, made it very clear that the objects that they were seeing included highly anomalous objects. And this is something that John and Jerry Tedesco have picked up with their Nightcrawler research laboratory. They've gone out and they've actually looked at these objects through their hyperspectral cameras and their other optical and sensor devices, and what they are recording is anomalous. So the big issue to me is not that these objects are anomalous, it's why is the United States government notably the Trump White House putting out a statement that is egregiously false and misleading and completely unsustainable in light of what Jake Barber has said. And in light of what New Jersey police and other military continue to say to me that these objects are anomalous. They're still there, they're still hovering, and whatever they are, they are not normal terrestrial vehicles.”

neandrewthal

74,116 views • 1 year ago

🚨 This is important... 🚨 "If you don't clear [Grusch's] record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else...that you're going to get punished if you come forward." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Burlison is the only MAGA politician who's willing to call out the Trump administration like this, on the UFO topic. It's subtle, but it's there. So what happens if they don't do this for Grusch? What will Burlison say and do? To me, if they don't do this for Grusch, we'll know that the Trump administration isn't serious about Disclosure. And why is he the only MAGA pol wiling to speak like this when it comes to the Trump admin? Where are Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office? We need them to speak up on these types of issues. And I'm only including a minute of what Matt Laslo got from Burlison so people can go support him by clicking on his YT videos and tweets, and subscribe to the only guy in DC who is trying to get us UAP answers from Congress on a daily basis.) Laslo: "What's up with these whispers about Grusch maybe getting his NDA waived?" Rep. Eric Burlison: "It needs to get... Well, he'll waive it. What he needs is his clearances all brought back." (Will Trump issue a SF-312 NDA waiver so Grusch can share a lot more of what he knows with the public?) Dr. Eric Davis to me in July... Davis: "Trump did NOT issue a SF-312 NDA waiver for us whistleblowers to reveal classified information to the public." ~ Laslo: "Are you talking with Stephen Miller and them about that?" Burlison: "Yes, I've been tenacious about that...because, to me, if you don't clear his record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else who might wanna come forward that you're going to get punished if you come forward." (I think we need a lot more in order for whistleblowers to feel comfortable enough to come forward, but this would be a good first step.) Laslo: "Would that be the President himself giving him that waiver? Or, what would that look like?" Burlison: "Yeah, I mean, honestly, the administration... And I've talked to them... They will readily admit that it was probably, they probably went too far with him." (Who are "they"?) Laslo: "Interesting." Burlison: "Yeah, they didn't need to make..." Laslo: "Who would admit that? FBI?" Burlison: "I'm not gonna say, because..yeah. Just out of a level of confidence.." (Great question by Laslo, as we REALLY need to know who admitted that. I'll link to the rest of the interview in the replies. They talk about the FBI, DoE, CIA, and FFRDCs.)
0:56

🚨 This is important... 🚨 "If you don't clear [Grusch's] record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else...that you're going to get punished if you come forward." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Burlison is the only MAGA politician who's willing to call out the Trump administration like this, on the UFO topic. It's subtle, but it's there. So what happens if they don't do this for Grusch? What will Burlison say and do? To me, if they don't do this for Grusch, we'll know that the Trump administration isn't serious about Disclosure. And why is he the only MAGA pol wiling to speak like this when it comes to the Trump admin? Where are Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office? We need them to speak up on these types of issues. And I'm only including a minute of what Matt Laslo got from Burlison so people can go support him by clicking on his YT videos and tweets, and subscribe to the only guy in DC who is trying to get us UAP answers from Congress on a daily basis.) Laslo: "What's up with these whispers about Grusch maybe getting his NDA waived?" Rep. Eric Burlison: "It needs to get... Well, he'll waive it. What he needs is his clearances all brought back." (Will Trump issue a SF-312 NDA waiver so Grusch can share a lot more of what he knows with the public?) Dr. Eric Davis to me in July... Davis: "Trump did NOT issue a SF-312 NDA waiver for us whistleblowers to reveal classified information to the public." ~ Laslo: "Are you talking with Stephen Miller and them about that?" Burlison: "Yes, I've been tenacious about that...because, to me, if you don't clear his record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else who might wanna come forward that you're going to get punished if you come forward." (I think we need a lot more in order for whistleblowers to feel comfortable enough to come forward, but this would be a good first step.) Laslo: "Would that be the President himself giving him that waiver? Or, what would that look like?" Burlison: "Yeah, I mean, honestly, the administration... And I've talked to them... They will readily admit that it was probably, they probably went too far with him." (Who are "they"?) Laslo: "Interesting." Burlison: "Yeah, they didn't need to make..." Laslo: "Who would admit that? FBI?" Burlison: "I'm not gonna say, because..yeah. Just out of a level of confidence.." (Great question by Laslo, as we REALLY need to know who admitted that. I'll link to the rest of the interview in the replies. They talk about the FBI, DoE, CIA, and FFRDCs.)

Joe Murgia

21,015 views • 18 days ago

Trump reads off a paper with Sharpie scribbles on it: "I'm allowed, that... meaning... me, are allowed to continue building as necessary. To... let's see. What is that? To cover the safety and security of the White House and its grounds, so it says here very carefully. So it talks about that we're allowed to continue building. So, just so you know, I wrote some of the thing down. This has the highest level of, in fact, they call this graph, this uh, grass, this... the glass uhh... it's bulletproof"
1:31

Trump reads off a paper with Sharpie scribbles on it: "I'm allowed, that... meaning... me, are allowed to continue building as necessary. To... let's see. What is that? To cover the safety and security of the White House and its grounds, so it says here very carefully. So it talks about that we're allowed to continue building. So, just so you know, I wrote some of the thing down. This has the highest level of, in fact, they call this graph, this uh, grass, this... the glass uhh... it's bulletproof"

Headquarters

522,521 views • 5 months ago

"I'm telling the administration...that if they don't release those [videos I've seen], then I have the capabilities of getting those videos and releasing them." ~Burlison (Transcript and comments by me on one of my fav segments in a long time.) ~ Will Cain: "Missouri Republican Congressman, Rep. Eric Burlison, joins me now. Congressman, thanks for being with us here today. You and I, Congressman, I think we've had a very candid conversation together. We have both talked about the fact that I am open and curious about this subject of UAPs, but I do feel like we're at a place where evidence needs to start meeting expectations. What we've seen today, what does this tell us? Does this meet any expectation?" Burlison: "I think that there's...we have to take a step back and recognize the historic nature of this. Every president prior to President Trump has really demurred any kind of questions on this. They dismissed them, they would not talk about it. People would, if anything, snicker or sneer anytime this kind of subject came up. So the fact that we have a president who is open and willing and trying to be transparent is something to celebrate. "That being said, I think that this is a teaser, this is a kind of a, you know, something to open up with. This was the low-hanging fruit kind of videos and content for this administration to release. A lot of this has been...some of this has been out there before. It's not been acknowledged, right? So, you're looking at Apollo 17 video..." Cain: "I've seen the same thing said by Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office. That this is sort of the beginning, and there will be other releases that could leave Americans with a holy crap moment. I believe that's a direct quote from Congressman Tim Burchett." (This is what Burchett tweeted today: Burchett: "The 1st drop will be big but in comparison to what is coming they will be a drop in the bucket. I would say 'Holy Crap' is coming." I hope so. Or people are going to be upset that the videos and evidence didn't meet the hype, and you may see a lot of people losing interest in this topic. Last month, he told Elizabeth Vargas: “I’ve seen pictures and video of things that defy any reason that we have." ~Burchett And also last month, he told NEWSMAX: “If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up. You'd be up at night worrying about or thinking about this stuff... And for the record, I'm not suicidal and I don't take risks.” ~Burchett (That's some major hype there and, again, I hope future videos live up to it. I'm gonna guess that Burlison is NOT a fan of getting people's expectation up like that.) Cain: "My question for you, or the congressman, would be: Why? Why slow roll this out like it's a season of 'Game of Thrones'? Like, why would Episode 1 be somewhat uninspiring - leave us with more questions than answered - if there's something coming after the teaser? What's the point in staging the release?" Burlison: "So, again, this...just from talking with the White House and this administration, this is not an easy thing to do. There's not one huge repository of all of these documents and videos and photos. Despite what most people believe, they're really...at least we haven't found that one, you know, big repository. So what the Agency is doing is going and finding, first and foremost, the items that are readily available to be released. And they wanna be quick...move quickly and release those." (Okay, so they haven't located the best videos yet? Then what was Burchett shown? And if what he was shown is really THAT amazing, why haven't those videos or photos been released? Drip, drip? The excuse that they haven't been able to locate them yet doesn't hold water IF Burchett's take is accurate and they showed him SOMETHING that blew his mind and will blow our minds. Or, did he just hype it up and whatever he saw is really not that impressive? As I've asked several times in the past: Do these amazing videos actually exist?) Burlison: "I would ask you, would you prefer to have them wait for, you know, years, what would probably take years if they were to do a comprehensive study and then release it all at once, in one big batch? I would prefer that they release it as they find it, and I think that that's...this administration wants to be transparent and do that." (Great! How about releasing what Burchett was referring to in his interviews?) Cain: "My criticism is not for the decisions of the administration." (Well, if the Trump administration isn't releasing the best of the best videos that they already have in their possession because they're afraid of how Americans (and the world) might react (fear and panic), then they DO deserve some criticism, right?) Cain: "My criticism is for the expectation built by many out there that have these conversations, that there will soon be a bomb to drop when it comes to revelations about aliens." (Burchett, and then Rep. Anna Paulina Luna with her repeated comments about interdimensional beings. Luna: "...this is something you can go back and watch with the Congressional hearings - but I was actually able to ask some of the witnesses, 'What are these things?' And they keep saying interdimensional. "I wouldn't call them aliens. I really like what Grusch calls it. He says that they're interdimensional beings and he's very specific about that." Grusch has NEVER said that, nor has any witness who testified in front of Congress, so I have no idea where she's getting that from.) Cain: "And, if that's true, are we trying to prepare the American people with a slow drip, drip, drip tease of this stuff? If not, then Congressman, I would say, if this is all we've got, then I'm not sure that there's anything the American government really has that tells us anything about the existence of aliens? I'm just beginning to feel like this entire story is teased out always just beyond our reach." (That's why we need just ONE (for starters) clear and close-up video of an object performing maneuvers that we thought were impossible. And as of right now, we don't have that. I've said this many times. Does that type of video exist?) Burlison: "I can sense your frustration. I've experienced it personally myself. I've seen videos that I think are in the process of being declassified, so I think that there is more to come. If they're not going to be declassified, I'll probably do an effort to release them myself under Speech and Debate." (In short, the Speech or Debate clause says that a Senator or Representative can speak freely about anything, or share anything, in either house of Congress and have absolute immunity from civil or criminal liability. I'll link to an example in the replies.) Burlison: "But again, a lot of the footage that I've seen is similar to what has been released today. There's some that are pretty interesting, and especially given the environment and the circumstances of the videos. Whether they are videos of UAP that are flying around Russian submarines or a video of our aircraft that are firing on some of these UAPs? I've seen those kind of videos. And so I'm teasing that because I know that...I'm telling the administration, through you (Will Cain) at this moment, that if they don't release those, then I have the capabilities of getting those videos and releasing them." (How much better are those videos than what we've seen today?) Cain: "Can I say one more thing about this, congressman? I expect you and I will have much longer conversations like we have in the past, where we have fewer time constraints. But what I'm seeing here, and we're sharing today, and what's been released, there are probably hundreds, perhaps 1000s, of explanations for what we see on these video screens. They don't lead us directly to extraterrestrial or out-of-this-world explanations. "Is there something else? Is there some other proof that you've seen? Is there a more compelling video that can't be described or explained as a drone or a light refraction or any other thing. Again, I'm not cynically dismissing these things, as I've always mentioned to you. I'm open and curious. I just don't think the evidence is meeting the moment." (I agree with Cain. The government-released or government-acquired footage just doesn't get us over the hump with the masses and skeptics.) Burlison: "I think you and I are at the exact same place. I continue to look for these things and try to follow the narrative that people are saying. Follow the historical narrative that we have a crash retrieval program, and this is the kind of information I keep getting presented. It doesn't mean that we don't stop looking." Cain: "Fair." (If we have recovered craft and bodies of non-humans, and it can be PROVEN, then these videos from today will be forgotten instantly.) Burlison: "And I have...and so the White House and the ODNI is looking for the next places to go investigate. And I think that...and they've actually been open in asking me where those next places should be, and so we're offering..we're gonna be working to offer those locations. A lot of this, Will, is gonna be in the hands of these agencies that are quasi-private or private companies, and that's gonna be a harder dig for this, for this administration to do, but that's where I think we're gonna get to the truth." (Let's start with the "holy crap" videos Burchett hyped and saw and see if they are as good as he's claiming.) Cain: "Well, to his defense, the President hasn't made big promises about what this would reveal. I don't think I can say that about everyone who purports to have seen something that there are big revelations, and so far, the evidence in the videos haven't met the promises. I do hope we continue to see more, congressman. I hope you do fight so we can see more. Obviously, transparency and answers is what we're seeking here on what would be a gigantic issue. Congressman Burlison, thanks, as always, for your time." Burlison: "Anytime."
9:08

"I'm telling the administration...that if they don't release those [videos I've seen], then I have the capabilities of getting those videos and releasing them." ~Burlison (Transcript and comments by me on one of my fav segments in a long time.) ~ Will Cain: "Missouri Republican Congressman, Rep. Eric Burlison, joins me now. Congressman, thanks for being with us here today. You and I, Congressman, I think we've had a very candid conversation together. We have both talked about the fact that I am open and curious about this subject of UAPs, but I do feel like we're at a place where evidence needs to start meeting expectations. What we've seen today, what does this tell us? Does this meet any expectation?" Burlison: "I think that there's...we have to take a step back and recognize the historic nature of this. Every president prior to President Trump has really demurred any kind of questions on this. They dismissed them, they would not talk about it. People would, if anything, snicker or sneer anytime this kind of subject came up. So the fact that we have a president who is open and willing and trying to be transparent is something to celebrate. "That being said, I think that this is a teaser, this is a kind of a, you know, something to open up with. This was the low-hanging fruit kind of videos and content for this administration to release. A lot of this has been...some of this has been out there before. It's not been acknowledged, right? So, you're looking at Apollo 17 video..." Cain: "I've seen the same thing said by Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office. That this is sort of the beginning, and there will be other releases that could leave Americans with a holy crap moment. I believe that's a direct quote from Congressman Tim Burchett." (This is what Burchett tweeted today: Burchett: "The 1st drop will be big but in comparison to what is coming they will be a drop in the bucket. I would say 'Holy Crap' is coming." I hope so. Or people are going to be upset that the videos and evidence didn't meet the hype, and you may see a lot of people losing interest in this topic. Last month, he told Elizabeth Vargas: “I’ve seen pictures and video of things that defy any reason that we have." ~Burchett And also last month, he told NEWSMAX: “If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up. You'd be up at night worrying about or thinking about this stuff... And for the record, I'm not suicidal and I don't take risks.” ~Burchett (That's some major hype there and, again, I hope future videos live up to it. I'm gonna guess that Burlison is NOT a fan of getting people's expectation up like that.) Cain: "My question for you, or the congressman, would be: Why? Why slow roll this out like it's a season of 'Game of Thrones'? Like, why would Episode 1 be somewhat uninspiring - leave us with more questions than answered - if there's something coming after the teaser? What's the point in staging the release?" Burlison: "So, again, this...just from talking with the White House and this administration, this is not an easy thing to do. There's not one huge repository of all of these documents and videos and photos. Despite what most people believe, they're really...at least we haven't found that one, you know, big repository. So what the Agency is doing is going and finding, first and foremost, the items that are readily available to be released. And they wanna be quick...move quickly and release those." (Okay, so they haven't located the best videos yet? Then what was Burchett shown? And if what he was shown is really THAT amazing, why haven't those videos or photos been released? Drip, drip? The excuse that they haven't been able to locate them yet doesn't hold water IF Burchett's take is accurate and they showed him SOMETHING that blew his mind and will blow our minds. Or, did he just hype it up and whatever he saw is really not that impressive? As I've asked several times in the past: Do these amazing videos actually exist?) Burlison: "I would ask you, would you prefer to have them wait for, you know, years, what would probably take years if they were to do a comprehensive study and then release it all at once, in one big batch? I would prefer that they release it as they find it, and I think that that's...this administration wants to be transparent and do that." (Great! How about releasing what Burchett was referring to in his interviews?) Cain: "My criticism is not for the decisions of the administration." (Well, if the Trump administration isn't releasing the best of the best videos that they already have in their possession because they're afraid of how Americans (and the world) might react (fear and panic), then they DO deserve some criticism, right?) Cain: "My criticism is for the expectation built by many out there that have these conversations, that there will soon be a bomb to drop when it comes to revelations about aliens." (Burchett, and then Rep. Anna Paulina Luna with her repeated comments about interdimensional beings. Luna: "...this is something you can go back and watch with the Congressional hearings - but I was actually able to ask some of the witnesses, 'What are these things?' And they keep saying interdimensional. "I wouldn't call them aliens. I really like what Grusch calls it. He says that they're interdimensional beings and he's very specific about that." Grusch has NEVER said that, nor has any witness who testified in front of Congress, so I have no idea where she's getting that from.) Cain: "And, if that's true, are we trying to prepare the American people with a slow drip, drip, drip tease of this stuff? If not, then Congressman, I would say, if this is all we've got, then I'm not sure that there's anything the American government really has that tells us anything about the existence of aliens? I'm just beginning to feel like this entire story is teased out always just beyond our reach." (That's why we need just ONE (for starters) clear and close-up video of an object performing maneuvers that we thought were impossible. And as of right now, we don't have that. I've said this many times. Does that type of video exist?) Burlison: "I can sense your frustration. I've experienced it personally myself. I've seen videos that I think are in the process of being declassified, so I think that there is more to come. If they're not going to be declassified, I'll probably do an effort to release them myself under Speech and Debate." (In short, the Speech or Debate clause says that a Senator or Representative can speak freely about anything, or share anything, in either house of Congress and have absolute immunity from civil or criminal liability. I'll link to an example in the replies.) Burlison: "But again, a lot of the footage that I've seen is similar to what has been released today. There's some that are pretty interesting, and especially given the environment and the circumstances of the videos. Whether they are videos of UAP that are flying around Russian submarines or a video of our aircraft that are firing on some of these UAPs? I've seen those kind of videos. And so I'm teasing that because I know that...I'm telling the administration, through you (Will Cain) at this moment, that if they don't release those, then I have the capabilities of getting those videos and releasing them." (How much better are those videos than what we've seen today?) Cain: "Can I say one more thing about this, congressman? I expect you and I will have much longer conversations like we have in the past, where we have fewer time constraints. But what I'm seeing here, and we're sharing today, and what's been released, there are probably hundreds, perhaps 1000s, of explanations for what we see on these video screens. They don't lead us directly to extraterrestrial or out-of-this-world explanations. "Is there something else? Is there some other proof that you've seen? Is there a more compelling video that can't be described or explained as a drone or a light refraction or any other thing. Again, I'm not cynically dismissing these things, as I've always mentioned to you. I'm open and curious. I just don't think the evidence is meeting the moment." (I agree with Cain. The government-released or government-acquired footage just doesn't get us over the hump with the masses and skeptics.) Burlison: "I think you and I are at the exact same place. I continue to look for these things and try to follow the narrative that people are saying. Follow the historical narrative that we have a crash retrieval program, and this is the kind of information I keep getting presented. It doesn't mean that we don't stop looking." Cain: "Fair." (If we have recovered craft and bodies of non-humans, and it can be PROVEN, then these videos from today will be forgotten instantly.) Burlison: "And I have...and so the White House and the ODNI is looking for the next places to go investigate. And I think that...and they've actually been open in asking me where those next places should be, and so we're offering..we're gonna be working to offer those locations. A lot of this, Will, is gonna be in the hands of these agencies that are quasi-private or private companies, and that's gonna be a harder dig for this, for this administration to do, but that's where I think we're gonna get to the truth." (Let's start with the "holy crap" videos Burchett hyped and saw and see if they are as good as he's claiming.) Cain: "Well, to his defense, the President hasn't made big promises about what this would reveal. I don't think I can say that about everyone who purports to have seen something that there are big revelations, and so far, the evidence in the videos haven't met the promises. I do hope we continue to see more, congressman. I hope you do fight so we can see more. Obviously, transparency and answers is what we're seeking here on what would be a gigantic issue. Congressman Burlison, thanks, as always, for your time." Burlison: "Anytime."

Joe Murgia

22,530 views • 4 months ago

"It's something that really captivates the mind, there's no question about it." ~Trump on UFOs 🛸 New Trump: Release of Government Files on UFOs Will Begin, "Very, Very Soon." 🛸 (He then reminded us that he doesn't seem to have much interest in the topic and thinks people who do are "out there." SMH.) Trump: "As you remember, I recently directed the Secretary of War...to begin releasing government files relating to UFOs and Unexplained Aerial Phenomena. And I figured this was a good crowd because I know you people, you're really into that. I don't know if I am, but you..." (Trump laughs as he's saying that last line and some of the crowd laughs along. Stigma is alive and well.) Trump: "So, I'm pleased to report today - I thought I'd save it for this crowd, because you're a little bit out there. You know, a little bit (crowd laughs) - that this process is well underway, and we found many very interesting documents, I must say." (Just documents, or videos of craft performing maneuvers we thought were impossible by what we know of today's technology and our understanding of physics?) Trump: "And the first releases will begin very, very soon. So you can go out and see if that phenomena is correct. You'll figure it out. Let me know. Let me know (crowd laughs)." (If he had a full briefing, he'd know that the phenomena is correct. Whatever that means.) Trump: "But we've had a lot of questions. It's something that really captivates the mind, there's no question about it."
0:56

"It's something that really captivates the mind, there's no question about it." ~Trump on UFOs 🛸 New Trump: Release of Government Files on UFOs Will Begin, "Very, Very Soon." 🛸 (He then reminded us that he doesn't seem to have much interest in the topic and thinks people who do are "out there." SMH.) Trump: "As you remember, I recently directed the Secretary of War...to begin releasing government files relating to UFOs and Unexplained Aerial Phenomena. And I figured this was a good crowd because I know you people, you're really into that. I don't know if I am, but you..." (Trump laughs as he's saying that last line and some of the crowd laughs along. Stigma is alive and well.) Trump: "So, I'm pleased to report today - I thought I'd save it for this crowd, because you're a little bit out there. You know, a little bit (crowd laughs) - that this process is well underway, and we found many very interesting documents, I must say." (Just documents, or videos of craft performing maneuvers we thought were impossible by what we know of today's technology and our understanding of physics?) Trump: "And the first releases will begin very, very soon. So you can go out and see if that phenomena is correct. You'll figure it out. Let me know. Let me know (crowd laughs)." (If he had a full briefing, he'd know that the phenomena is correct. Whatever that means.) Trump: "But we've had a lot of questions. It's something that really captivates the mind, there's no question about it."

Joe Murgia

13,379 views • 5 months ago

Gallego on Mamdani: "It's okay to say 'I disagree with this, this, and this, but I agree with that.' But the idea that we're just gonna throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people, just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us is dumb. The problem with Democrats is that we have been shrinking our tent as much as possible to the point where there are not many people left. And that happens on the left side of our party and it also happens on the right side of the party."
1:08

Gallego on Mamdani: "It's okay to say 'I disagree with this, this, and this, but I agree with that.' But the idea that we're just gonna throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people, just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us is dumb. The problem with Democrats is that we have been shrinking our tent as much as possible to the point where there are not many people left. And that happens on the left side of our party and it also happens on the right side of the party."

Aaron Rupar

469,131 views • 1 year ago

🛸👽🔥 Grusch is Back! More Excellent Coverage! 🔥👽🛸 🛸👽🔥 Grusch: I've Seen Intelligence Reports Featuring Photos of Craft and Bodies of Non-humans - Trump is Certainly Very Well Informed on UAP 🔥👽🛸 (Partial and rushed transcript) "There's some other things that are happening behind the scenes that I'll let the [Tump] administration discuss when they're ready." Why are they here? "Could it because we have interesting genetic material on Earth? We're a Jurassic Park tourist attraction for them? Could be a myriad of reasons." ~ Grusch: "I was, actually, partially cleared into some of those activities. It was beyond oral testimony provided to me. I actually had partial access to the data and actually read the intelligence reports resulting from those programs." Baier: "With your own eyes? You saw it?" Grusch: "Correct. Yes." Where's the evidence? Grusch: "Certainly members of this current administration are very well aware of this reality. Certainly, the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership on it, and I think he's assembled in an A team cabinet. And I really believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader, likely in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues." ~ Trump (from a clip): "I've never been convinced. For some reason, it's not my thing." ~ Baier: " So you think, one, he knows, and two, he's open to transparency on UAPs?" Grusch: "He certainly is very well informed on this issue. I'll leave it at that. I don't want to get ahead of what the President might want to reveal, personally." Baier: "And when you mentioned in that testimony of recovering the pilots or remains, non-human? That's something that you saw, as far as the intelligence, with your eyes?" Grusch: "Yes. And it is a very uncomfortable, even for me now, as somebody who's seen it, experienced it, even talking about it, because it's so outside a normal person's world view, to understand that there is this biological sentience that have piloted these crafts, that don't necessarily look 100% like you and I." Baier: "Were there pictures, were there?" Grusch: "There were. Yes, there were." Baier: "We recovered things, you say." Grusch: "Yeah." Baier: "Bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense that the motive of whether...how they got here, what they were doing? Was it peaceful? Not peaceful?" Grusch: "We've seen a mixed bag of activity. And, motive and intent, why they're visiting? Once again, that gets into our assessments, not necessarily...we can't quite understand the intent of some of the sentience and why they're visiting. Could it because we have interesting genetic material on Earth? We're a Jurassic Park tourist attraction for them? Could be a myriad of reasons." "I believe there's an appetite with the administration to do the right thing on this as well. And there's some other things that are happening behind the scenes that I'll let the administration discuss when they're ready."
7:49

🛸👽🔥 Grusch is Back! More Excellent Coverage! 🔥👽🛸 🛸👽🔥 Grusch: I've Seen Intelligence Reports Featuring Photos of Craft and Bodies of Non-humans - Trump is Certainly Very Well Informed on UAP 🔥👽🛸 (Partial and rushed transcript) "There's some other things that are happening behind the scenes that I'll let the [Tump] administration discuss when they're ready." Why are they here? "Could it because we have interesting genetic material on Earth? We're a Jurassic Park tourist attraction for them? Could be a myriad of reasons." ~ Grusch: "I was, actually, partially cleared into some of those activities. It was beyond oral testimony provided to me. I actually had partial access to the data and actually read the intelligence reports resulting from those programs." Baier: "With your own eyes? You saw it?" Grusch: "Correct. Yes." Where's the evidence? Grusch: "Certainly members of this current administration are very well aware of this reality. Certainly, the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership on it, and I think he's assembled in an A team cabinet. And I really believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader, likely in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues." ~ Trump (from a clip): "I've never been convinced. For some reason, it's not my thing." ~ Baier: " So you think, one, he knows, and two, he's open to transparency on UAPs?" Grusch: "He certainly is very well informed on this issue. I'll leave it at that. I don't want to get ahead of what the President might want to reveal, personally." Baier: "And when you mentioned in that testimony of recovering the pilots or remains, non-human? That's something that you saw, as far as the intelligence, with your eyes?" Grusch: "Yes. And it is a very uncomfortable, even for me now, as somebody who's seen it, experienced it, even talking about it, because it's so outside a normal person's world view, to understand that there is this biological sentience that have piloted these crafts, that don't necessarily look 100% like you and I." Baier: "Were there pictures, were there?" Grusch: "There were. Yes, there were." Baier: "We recovered things, you say." Grusch: "Yeah." Baier: "Bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense that the motive of whether...how they got here, what they were doing? Was it peaceful? Not peaceful?" Grusch: "We've seen a mixed bag of activity. And, motive and intent, why they're visiting? Once again, that gets into our assessments, not necessarily...we can't quite understand the intent of some of the sentience and why they're visiting. Could it because we have interesting genetic material on Earth? We're a Jurassic Park tourist attraction for them? Could be a myriad of reasons." "I believe there's an appetite with the administration to do the right thing on this as well. And there's some other things that are happening behind the scenes that I'll let the administration discuss when they're ready."

Joe Murgia

55,645 views • 10 months ago

🔥 MARC ANDREESSEN: “There's nothing that happened at Twitter, in the Twitter files, that wasn't happening at all the other companies. So it's a consistent pattern. If you got the YouTube files, they would look exactly the same. And of course, we should get the YouTube files. And now we probably will ... I think there are people with criminal liability who are involved in this ... I would imagine the new Trump Administration is going to come in and carve all that wide open. And I know that there are people being appointed to senior positions who are very determined to do that." Joe Rogan Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Elon Musk
2:40

🔥 MARC ANDREESSEN: “There's nothing that happened at Twitter, in the Twitter files, that wasn't happening at all the other companies. So it's a consistent pattern. If you got the YouTube files, they would look exactly the same. And of course, we should get the YouTube files. And now we probably will ... I think there are people with criminal liability who are involved in this ... I would imagine the new Trump Administration is going to come in and carve all that wide open. And I know that there are people being appointed to senior positions who are very determined to do that." Joe Rogan Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Elon Musk

Chief Nerd

422,436 views • 1 year ago

Rand Paul: “We are very hopeful that, Robert Kennedy will have a big influence in the Trump administration.” “We're very hopeful that whoever will be head of health and human services will now reveal the documents I've been trying to get for 3 years. NIH and HHS have refused to turn over the documents as to why Wuhan got this research money and why it wasn't screened as dangerous research.” “Those documents exist and they won't give them to me. I think a friendly Trump administration will.” “I'm looking forward to getting those, mainly because we need to try to make sure this doesn't happen again.
0:44

Rand Paul: “We are very hopeful that, Robert Kennedy will have a big influence in the Trump administration.” “We're very hopeful that whoever will be head of health and human services will now reveal the documents I've been trying to get for 3 years. NIH and HHS have refused to turn over the documents as to why Wuhan got this research money and why it wasn't screened as dangerous research.” “Those documents exist and they won't give them to me. I think a friendly Trump administration will.” “I'm looking forward to getting those, mainly because we need to try to make sure this doesn't happen again.

End Tribalism in Politics

2,050,118 views • 1 year ago

The Ditch: The Party Line | Episode 8: Trump's Party and Class, with Nausicaa Runner 'I don't know if we negotiate it. We kind of let them say what they're going to say. If they want to audit us, that's fine. They can audit us and see that we get no money from any foreign government. I just think it's really telling that publishing really basic political statements from another country is seen as some kind of unheard of propaganda. But it's also telling because all those people are forced to read us too. We have so much information that we know makes it to the Pentagon and the White House that they're reading our stories to understand what the Iranian perspective is. So it's this funny thing where, yeah, they come out against us pretty virulently and we are definitely always watching for that. But on the other hand I think that we've succeeded in making ourselves a bit indispensable for those very same people.' - Nausicaa Renner 🍷🌑🌊, Drop Site editor
2:14

The Ditch: The Party Line | Episode 8: Trump's Party and Class, with Nausicaa Runner 'I don't know if we negotiate it. We kind of let them say what they're going to say. If they want to audit us, that's fine. They can audit us and see that we get no money from any foreign government. I just think it's really telling that publishing really basic political statements from another country is seen as some kind of unheard of propaganda. But it's also telling because all those people are forced to read us too. We have so much information that we know makes it to the Pentagon and the White House that they're reading our stories to understand what the Iranian perspective is. So it's this funny thing where, yeah, they come out against us pretty virulently and we are definitely always watching for that. But on the other hand I think that we've succeeded in making ourselves a bit indispensable for those very same people.' - Nausicaa Renner 🍷🌑🌊, Drop Site editor

The Ditch

30,626 views • 4 months ago