Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sept 2025. Marco Rubio combats a hostile George Stephanopoulos, who angrily tries to get Rubio to agree that USAID cuts are causing deaths. Rubio’s methodical response: "We shut down AID because it was a dysfunctional organization. We moved it under the State Department. Number two, we are going to...

WesternLensman's profile picture

Western Lensman

384,948 subscribers

413,974 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sec. Marco Rubio just eviscerated ABC's George Stephanopoulos who tried to claim people "DIED" due to cutting USAID. GEORGE: You're saying no one's died because of the cuts?! Are they lying? RUBIO: "No. That's RIDICULOUS. Well, then they died because ENGLAND or CANADA didn't give more, or China! Let's blame the other countries who don't give ANY foreign aid." GEORGE: So you're not disputing it? RUBIO: "ANYONE who tells you it's the US, if we cut a dollar we're responsible for some horrific thing? It's just not TRUE." "It's not because we cut the aid. It's because there's a war going on and the aid never got to the people...they use aid as a tool against the people. In some of these places, it can't even be distributed!" "It gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs...THEY'RE the ones to blame, not us, who've provided more than anyone else." GEORGE: You're standing by NO ONE has died? RUBIO: "No one has died because the US cut aid. NO. People have died because gangs steal the aid, other countries haven't stepped up - but the US has saved more lives than ANY country in the world!" "We're not gonna continue to pour BILLIONS out the door of taxpayer funds for programs that don't work and in some cases were flat-out CORRUPT." 🔥
2:48

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sec. Marco Rubio just eviscerated ABC's George Stephanopoulos who tried to claim people "DIED" due to cutting USAID. GEORGE: You're saying no one's died because of the cuts?! Are they lying? RUBIO: "No. That's RIDICULOUS. Well, then they died because ENGLAND or CANADA didn't give more, or China! Let's blame the other countries who don't give ANY foreign aid." GEORGE: So you're not disputing it? RUBIO: "ANYONE who tells you it's the US, if we cut a dollar we're responsible for some horrific thing? It's just not TRUE." "It's not because we cut the aid. It's because there's a war going on and the aid never got to the people...they use aid as a tool against the people. In some of these places, it can't even be distributed!" "It gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs...THEY'RE the ones to blame, not us, who've provided more than anyone else." GEORGE: You're standing by NO ONE has died? RUBIO: "No one has died because the US cut aid. NO. People have died because gangs steal the aid, other countries haven't stepped up - but the US has saved more lives than ANY country in the world!" "We're not gonna continue to pour BILLIONS out the door of taxpayer funds for programs that don't work and in some cases were flat-out CORRUPT." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

2,470,423 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Secretary of State Marco Rubio exploded as ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos pressed him on his denial that people had died as a result of U.S. aid cuts. During the Tuedsay morning interview on Good Morning America Rubio painted the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shuttered by Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative this year, as having been bloated and corrupt. We shut down U.S. aid because it was a dysfunctional organization,” Rubio began. “We moved it under the State Department,” he said. “We are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world… but we’re going to do it the right way.” “That’s all in the future, but are you standing by that comment you’re saying that no one died because of the aid cuts are all those aid organizations?” Stephanopoulos asked. “That’s ridiculous,” Rubio snapped back. Rubio continued: “Well first of all, well then they died because England didn’t give enough money or Canada didn’t give more or China did. Let’s blame the other countries that don’t do any foreign aid. How about China? I mean China’s the second largest economy in the world. They don’t give money to these projects.” “I think anybody who tells you that somehow it’s the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we’re responsible for some horrific thing that’s going on in the world, it’s just not true,” Rubio replied. The secretary of state pivoted to blame corruption and “gangs” in the countries receiving aid. Rubio continued: “One of the reasons why some of the places didn’t get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It’s because there’s a war going on and the aid never got to the people. So in Sudan, for example, it’s not just a humanitarian catastrophe, it is a war zone. Okay, the aid is stolen, the aid is impeded, in fact they use aid as a tool against the people, and so blocking aid is a tool and an arm of war. So in some of these places, the reason why the aid isn’t getting there is it can’t be distributed.” He added: “Look at Haiti, one of the reasons why aid can’t be distributed in Haiti, is you can send all the aid in the world you want, it gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they’re the ones to blame for whatever is happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else.” Returning to his original question: “Stephanopoulos again replied, “Well let me just say one more time, are you standing by your contention that no one has died?” “No one has died because the United States has cut aid,” Rubio clapped back. “No, people have died because gangs steal the aid. People have died because the distributors of aid have not done well. People have died because other countries haven’t stepped up, but the United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world.” He concluded: “And we’re gonna continue to do it, but we’re going to do the right way and in a responsible way. We’re not going to continue to pour billions of dollars out the door of American taxpayer funds for programs that don’t work and in some cases were flat out corrupt.” Who loves Marco Rubio as Secretary of State? I do! 👍🏻
1:30

Secretary of State Marco Rubio exploded as ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos pressed him on his denial that people had died as a result of U.S. aid cuts. During the Tuedsay morning interview on Good Morning America Rubio painted the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shuttered by Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative this year, as having been bloated and corrupt. We shut down U.S. aid because it was a dysfunctional organization,” Rubio began. “We moved it under the State Department,” he said. “We are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world… but we’re going to do it the right way.” “That’s all in the future, but are you standing by that comment you’re saying that no one died because of the aid cuts are all those aid organizations?” Stephanopoulos asked. “That’s ridiculous,” Rubio snapped back. Rubio continued: “Well first of all, well then they died because England didn’t give enough money or Canada didn’t give more or China did. Let’s blame the other countries that don’t do any foreign aid. How about China? I mean China’s the second largest economy in the world. They don’t give money to these projects.” “I think anybody who tells you that somehow it’s the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we’re responsible for some horrific thing that’s going on in the world, it’s just not true,” Rubio replied. The secretary of state pivoted to blame corruption and “gangs” in the countries receiving aid. Rubio continued: “One of the reasons why some of the places didn’t get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It’s because there’s a war going on and the aid never got to the people. So in Sudan, for example, it’s not just a humanitarian catastrophe, it is a war zone. Okay, the aid is stolen, the aid is impeded, in fact they use aid as a tool against the people, and so blocking aid is a tool and an arm of war. So in some of these places, the reason why the aid isn’t getting there is it can’t be distributed.” He added: “Look at Haiti, one of the reasons why aid can’t be distributed in Haiti, is you can send all the aid in the world you want, it gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they’re the ones to blame for whatever is happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else.” Returning to his original question: “Stephanopoulos again replied, “Well let me just say one more time, are you standing by your contention that no one has died?” “No one has died because the United States has cut aid,” Rubio clapped back. “No, people have died because gangs steal the aid. People have died because the distributors of aid have not done well. People have died because other countries haven’t stepped up, but the United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world.” He concluded: “And we’re gonna continue to do it, but we’re going to do the right way and in a responsible way. We’re not going to continue to pour billions of dollars out the door of American taxpayer funds for programs that don’t work and in some cases were flat out corrupt.” Who loves Marco Rubio as Secretary of State? I do! 👍🏻

Victoria 🇺🇸⏳🗽🚔

73,432 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

.Secretary Marco Rubio: “We are not going to fund an NGO industrial complex that built itself up, was taking a substantial percentage of the money, and not going directly to the recipients … we are restructuring the way we do aid that’ll be a lot more effective and integrated into the holistic foreign policy.” — Secretary Marco Rubio on Good Morning America
0:57

.Secretary Marco Rubio: “We are not going to fund an NGO industrial complex that built itself up, was taking a substantial percentage of the money, and not going directly to the recipients … we are restructuring the way we do aid that’ll be a lot more effective and integrated into the holistic foreign policy.” — Secretary Marco Rubio on Good Morning America

Department of State

63,553 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you standing by your comment that no one has died because of the aid cuts? Are all those aid organizations lying? MARCO RUBIO: They died because England didn't give enough money or Canada didn't give more or China didn't. Let's blame the other countries that don't do any foreign aid. STEPHANOPOULOS: So you're no longer disputing that the aid cuts have cost lives
2:44

STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you standing by your comment that no one has died because of the aid cuts? Are all those aid organizations lying? MARCO RUBIO: They died because England didn't give enough money or Canada didn't give more or China didn't. Let's blame the other countries that don't do any foreign aid. STEPHANOPOULOS: So you're no longer disputing that the aid cuts have cost lives

Aaron Rupar

1,065,687 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 MARCO RUBIO WANTS TO MOVE ON CUBA "We've offered the regime there $100 MILLION dollars of humanitarian aid that unfortunately, so far, they have not agreed to distribute, to help the people of Cuba!" "So we did the hurricane relief, but we're offering more, and it's the regime that's not accepting it." "It's the regime that's standing in the way of it, so we discussed that and we hope we can do it because we do want to help the people of Cuba who are being hurt by this incompetent regime." 🇺🇸🇨🇺
0:33

🚨 MARCO RUBIO WANTS TO MOVE ON CUBA "We've offered the regime there $100 MILLION dollars of humanitarian aid that unfortunately, so far, they have not agreed to distribute, to help the people of Cuba!" "So we did the hurricane relief, but we're offering more, and it's the regime that's not accepting it." "It's the regime that's standing in the way of it, so we discussed that and we hope we can do it because we do want to help the people of Cuba who are being hurt by this incompetent regime." 🇺🇸🇨🇺

Eric Daugherty

181,391 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

From July 2024: Nick Fuentes makes the case for sending foreign aid to Israel. -- TRANSCRIPT The president's policy is, let's make Israel independent from the United States. That's not good for the United States. And this is gonna sound, like, you know, counterintuitive, but you know, you could look it up. Last summer, all the Jews got—this sounds dumb the way I'm saying it—but look up Tablet Magazine. It's a Jewish paper. In July 2023, they did a symposium on foreign aid to Israel. And so, all of their contributors wrote, you know, for or against, whether we should get rid of it or not get rid of it. And—the guy's name is Siegel, he's, like, a prominent neocon, his dad's a big neocon, and they're connected to everybody. And the main article says, "We need to get rid of foreign aid to Israel," but not for the reason that you'd think. You know, we all thought we were based for being against foreign to aid to Israel, and for obvious reasons—"We need to spend the tax dollars here!"—True! But what Siegel—I think his name's Jacob Siegel; his dad's Fred Siegel—What Jacob Siegel argues is, no, we need to rid of foreign aid to Israel because it's acting as golden handcuffs. They're saying that as America, as the left becomes more anti-Israel—and the left is hegemonic—the United States will use the aid that they give to Israel to leverage Israel and restrain Israel. He said, "So, we need to get rid of the foreign aid so we can be completely independent. And we can do whatever we want. And the United States can't control us." So, the most militant Zionists are now actually arguing against the foreign aid. And that's why, by the way, you know, when Matt Walsh at Daily Wire says "We shouldn't send foreign to Israel," and Jeremy Boreing and Ben Shapiro say, "Oh, well, you know, you don't get fired for—" And Shapiro and Boreing say "Oh, see, we allow a rebuttal. We allow the different opinion on our show." Yeah, that's because that actually helps them. They don't want the foreign aid because they—some of these so-called revisionist Zionists, Jewish maximalists—they want to get rid of the foreign aid so they have the freedom of action. And JD Vance, looking to him—he runs a hedge fund, he was with Peter Thiel, the guy's like a Straussian—JD Vance says: We need to arm Israel so they can conduct an independent foreign policy. We need to arm them so that they can confront Iran. So like, this is the policy. And the policy is to make Israel independent of us. But, you know, we want these countries—It's actually ironically America First to make these countries dependent on us.
3:47

From July 2024: Nick Fuentes makes the case for sending foreign aid to Israel. -- TRANSCRIPT The president's policy is, let's make Israel independent from the United States. That's not good for the United States. And this is gonna sound, like, you know, counterintuitive, but you know, you could look it up. Last summer, all the Jews got—this sounds dumb the way I'm saying it—but look up Tablet Magazine. It's a Jewish paper. In July 2023, they did a symposium on foreign aid to Israel. And so, all of their contributors wrote, you know, for or against, whether we should get rid of it or not get rid of it. And—the guy's name is Siegel, he's, like, a prominent neocon, his dad's a big neocon, and they're connected to everybody. And the main article says, "We need to get rid of foreign aid to Israel," but not for the reason that you'd think. You know, we all thought we were based for being against foreign to aid to Israel, and for obvious reasons—"We need to spend the tax dollars here!"—True! But what Siegel—I think his name's Jacob Siegel; his dad's Fred Siegel—What Jacob Siegel argues is, no, we need to rid of foreign aid to Israel because it's acting as golden handcuffs. They're saying that as America, as the left becomes more anti-Israel—and the left is hegemonic—the United States will use the aid that they give to Israel to leverage Israel and restrain Israel. He said, "So, we need to get rid of the foreign aid so we can be completely independent. And we can do whatever we want. And the United States can't control us." So, the most militant Zionists are now actually arguing against the foreign aid. And that's why, by the way, you know, when Matt Walsh at Daily Wire says "We shouldn't send foreign to Israel," and Jeremy Boreing and Ben Shapiro say, "Oh, well, you know, you don't get fired for—" And Shapiro and Boreing say "Oh, see, we allow a rebuttal. We allow the different opinion on our show." Yeah, that's because that actually helps them. They don't want the foreign aid because they—some of these so-called revisionist Zionists, Jewish maximalists—they want to get rid of the foreign aid so they have the freedom of action. And JD Vance, looking to him—he runs a hedge fund, he was with Peter Thiel, the guy's like a Straussian—JD Vance says: We need to arm Israel so they can conduct an independent foreign policy. We need to arm them so that they can confront Iran. So like, this is the policy. And the policy is to make Israel independent of us. But, you know, we want these countries—It's actually ironically America First to make these countries dependent on us.

Max 📟

13,612 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Americans who justify their obsession with Israel on the fact that we give it more "aid" (it's not actually aid) than we give any other country are dumbstruck when you follow up with, "then why are so many other countries, that don't give a single cent to Israel & are not even on the same continent, also microscopically & singularly focused on the one Jewish state?" The truth is, the $3.8 billion yearly American military credit package to Israel has a return of investment upwards of 150%. And it boosts our economy, keeping us on the cutting edge of defense technology and highly competititve in the global arena.
3:01

Americans who justify their obsession with Israel on the fact that we give it more "aid" (it's not actually aid) than we give any other country are dumbstruck when you follow up with, "then why are so many other countries, that don't give a single cent to Israel & are not even on the same continent, also microscopically & singularly focused on the one Jewish state?" The truth is, the $3.8 billion yearly American military credit package to Israel has a return of investment upwards of 150%. And it boosts our economy, keeping us on the cutting edge of defense technology and highly competititve in the global arena.

Karys Rhea

36,908 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

❗️Ukraine is not America’s war, and yet we have contributed more to this fight than any other country in the world — U.S. Secretary of State Rubio “The United States constantly asks for help in the war, and we have provided more assistance than any other country in the world in a war that is taking place on another continent, in Ukraine. But when the United States needed help, we did not receive positive responses.”
0:29

❗️Ukraine is not America’s war, and yet we have contributed more to this fight than any other country in the world — U.S. Secretary of State Rubio “The United States constantly asks for help in the war, and we have provided more assistance than any other country in the world in a war that is taking place on another continent, in Ukraine. But when the United States needed help, we did not receive positive responses.”

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

17,594 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨MIKE BENZ: "There is no aid in USAID. It's not an aid organization. USAID stands for US Agency for International Development. What it's developing is all the activist organizations in foreign countries that the state department is building to gain influence. USAID was created to be a central hub that organized all the different foreign clandestine operations. It has a $50B budget. The entire intelligence community is only $72B. It's more than the CIA and the State Department. Its a switch player to assist the pentagon, the state department, and the intelligence community."
1:43

🚨MIKE BENZ: "There is no aid in USAID. It's not an aid organization. USAID stands for US Agency for International Development. What it's developing is all the activist organizations in foreign countries that the state department is building to gain influence. USAID was created to be a central hub that organized all the different foreign clandestine operations. It has a $50B budget. The entire intelligence community is only $72B. It's more than the CIA and the State Department. Its a switch player to assist the pentagon, the state department, and the intelligence community."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,389,199 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH: Ramaswamy Exposes Foreign Aid as a Smokescreen for Covert U.S. Political Operations | Vivek Ramaswamy just unleashed on the entire premise of U.S. foreign aid. He claims it actually has little to do with helping other nations, instead serving as a cover for advancing progressive political agendas globally. Ramaswamy argued taxpayer dollars have long been misused to promote "LGBTQIA+ agendas" and "woke and DEI agendas," which only further alienate foreign nations and damage America's global standing. Vivek Ramaswamy stated; "The idea of foreign aid in some sense I don't think we should be using our taxpayer dollars even to help people in foreign countries when we should be helping our own citizens here at home first." "But the irony is it's not even going to help starving children in Africa." "That's just the smoke screen and the excuse to actually carry out a political agenda through the back door." "I think it was shameful that we're finding out about state funded media here in the united States. But I think equally bad is the fact that we're using that USAID, that foreign aid industrial complex to push progressive ideas." "LGBTQIA+ agendas. Woke and DEI agendas onto foreign countries that cause people in those other countries to actually hate the united States for values that most Americans don't even share." "In some ways, it's the financial cost that's bad but that's the least of it. It's actually the other effects of that illicit foreign aid that's hurting the United States even geopolitically in other ways."
1:25

WATCH: Ramaswamy Exposes Foreign Aid as a Smokescreen for Covert U.S. Political Operations | Vivek Ramaswamy just unleashed on the entire premise of U.S. foreign aid. He claims it actually has little to do with helping other nations, instead serving as a cover for advancing progressive political agendas globally. Ramaswamy argued taxpayer dollars have long been misused to promote "LGBTQIA+ agendas" and "woke and DEI agendas," which only further alienate foreign nations and damage America's global standing. Vivek Ramaswamy stated; "The idea of foreign aid in some sense I don't think we should be using our taxpayer dollars even to help people in foreign countries when we should be helping our own citizens here at home first." "But the irony is it's not even going to help starving children in Africa." "That's just the smoke screen and the excuse to actually carry out a political agenda through the back door." "I think it was shameful that we're finding out about state funded media here in the united States. But I think equally bad is the fact that we're using that USAID, that foreign aid industrial complex to push progressive ideas." "LGBTQIA+ agendas. Woke and DEI agendas onto foreign countries that cause people in those other countries to actually hate the united States for values that most Americans don't even share." "In some ways, it's the financial cost that's bad but that's the least of it. It's actually the other effects of that illicit foreign aid that's hurting the United States even geopolitically in other ways."

Overton

13,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: Russia will only be able to destroy Ukraine if Ukraine is unable to defend itself. If the US does not provide the means to do so, are we going to do it? Question mark. This is the existential question that Europe must answer for itself: Are we in a position to help Ukraine defend itself even if the United States does not? It depends on how willing we are. So far, we have helped Ukraine more than the United States, both in civilian and military terms. Can we do even more and replace the United States? This comes at a cost, and what is needed is not only the will and the ability to pay for it, but also to convert the money into weapons. Because people don't go to the front with a bag of cash; people go to the front with weapons. And between money and weapons there is something called industry, that is, production capacity.
1:49

Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: Russia will only be able to destroy Ukraine if Ukraine is unable to defend itself. If the US does not provide the means to do so, are we going to do it? Question mark. This is the existential question that Europe must answer for itself: Are we in a position to help Ukraine defend itself even if the United States does not? It depends on how willing we are. So far, we have helped Ukraine more than the United States, both in civilian and military terms. Can we do even more and replace the United States? This comes at a cost, and what is needed is not only the will and the ability to pay for it, but also to convert the money into weapons. Because people don't go to the front with a bag of cash; people go to the front with weapons. And between money and weapons there is something called industry, that is, production capacity.

Anton Gerashchenko

51,525 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On the question of recent changes in J1 visa, F1, H-1B visa, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, "First of all, I accept the contribution that Indians have made to the U.S. economy. Over $20 billion has been invested in the U.S economy by Indian companies. We want that number to continue to increase... The changes that are happening now, or the modernisation of our migration system into the United States, are not India-specific; it is global, it's being applied across the world. We are in a period of modernisation. We've had a migratory crisis in the United States. This is not because of India, but broadly, we have had over 20 million people illegally enter the United States over the last few years, and we've had to address that challenge... Everything that you do as a country needs to be in your national interest, and that includes your immigration policy. The United States, I believe, is the most welcoming country in the world on immigration. Every single year, a million people, roughly, become permanent residents of the United States and contribute greatly. My parents entered the United States as permanent residents in 1956 from Cuba. It's a process that's enriched us. But it has to be a process that's adjusted in every era to the realities of the modern times in which you live. We are, and it's long overdue. So the United States is currently undergoing a process of reforming the system by which we choose how many people come into our country, who comes in, when they come in, cetera. Anytime you undertake a reform, any time you undertake a change in the system by which you admit people, there's going to be a period of transition that's going to create some friction points and some difficulties and so forth... It is not a system that is targeted at India; it is one that's being applied globally. But we're in a period of transition, and like any period of transition, there's going to be some bumps on that road. But we think ultimately our destination is going to be a better system, a more efficient system, one that works better than the one that we had in place previously and more sustainable by the way."
4:02

#WATCH | Delhi: On the question of recent changes in J1 visa, F1, H-1B visa, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, "First of all, I accept the contribution that Indians have made to the U.S. economy. Over $20 billion has been invested in the U.S economy by Indian companies. We want that number to continue to increase... The changes that are happening now, or the modernisation of our migration system into the United States, are not India-specific; it is global, it's being applied across the world. We are in a period of modernisation. We've had a migratory crisis in the United States. This is not because of India, but broadly, we have had over 20 million people illegally enter the United States over the last few years, and we've had to address that challenge... Everything that you do as a country needs to be in your national interest, and that includes your immigration policy. The United States, I believe, is the most welcoming country in the world on immigration. Every single year, a million people, roughly, become permanent residents of the United States and contribute greatly. My parents entered the United States as permanent residents in 1956 from Cuba. It's a process that's enriched us. But it has to be a process that's adjusted in every era to the realities of the modern times in which you live. We are, and it's long overdue. So the United States is currently undergoing a process of reforming the system by which we choose how many people come into our country, who comes in, when they come in, cetera. Anytime you undertake a reform, any time you undertake a change in the system by which you admit people, there's going to be a period of transition that's going to create some friction points and some difficulties and so forth... It is not a system that is targeted at India; it is one that's being applied globally. But we're in a period of transition, and like any period of transition, there's going to be some bumps on that road. But we think ultimately our destination is going to be a better system, a more efficient system, one that works better than the one that we had in place previously and more sustainable by the way."

ANI

210,781 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Tommy Pigott: "Only 10% of [foreign aid] went to the issue. 90% was eaten up by bureaucracy and contractors and layer after layer of people making money on those efforts... It's not that we're pulling back on foreign aid -- It's actually getting it back to the point where we can make a difference; where the money that is spent actually goes to the issues that matter to the American people."
1:21

.Tommy Pigott: "Only 10% of [foreign aid] went to the issue. 90% was eaten up by bureaucracy and contractors and layer after layer of people making money on those efforts... It's not that we're pulling back on foreign aid -- It's actually getting it back to the point where we can make a difference; where the money that is spent actually goes to the issues that matter to the American people."

Rapid Response 47

243,498 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇲🇽🇨🇺 Mexico to Dispatch First Humanitarian Aid Shipment to Cuba as Sheinbaum Seeks Diplomatic Resolution on Oil Sanctions: “This week we are planning a humanitarian aid shipment to Cuba. It is aid that will be carried out by the Secretariat of the Navy, consisting of food and other products, while we resolve diplomatically everything related to the shipment of oil for humanitarian reasons. But we are already doing all the work necessary to be able to send, in the meantime, humanitarian aid that the Cuban people require—other goods, other essential supplies. That is important. As I said the other day at the press conference, we never spoke with president Trump about the issue of oil with Cuba, and then in the afternoon tariffs were imposed on any country that sends oil to the island. So we are pursuing all diplomatic avenues, because as we have said, this is a matter of fundamental humanitarian assistance for the island. But in the meantime, we are going to send other products that are indispensable for the Cuban people.”
1:42

🚨🇲🇽🇨🇺 Mexico to Dispatch First Humanitarian Aid Shipment to Cuba as Sheinbaum Seeks Diplomatic Resolution on Oil Sanctions: “This week we are planning a humanitarian aid shipment to Cuba. It is aid that will be carried out by the Secretariat of the Navy, consisting of food and other products, while we resolve diplomatically everything related to the shipment of oil for humanitarian reasons. But we are already doing all the work necessary to be able to send, in the meantime, humanitarian aid that the Cuban people require—other goods, other essential supplies. That is important. As I said the other day at the press conference, we never spoke with president Trump about the issue of oil with Cuba, and then in the afternoon tariffs were imposed on any country that sends oil to the island. So we are pursuing all diplomatic avenues, because as we have said, this is a matter of fundamental humanitarian assistance for the island. But in the meantime, we are going to send other products that are indispensable for the Cuban people.”

Samuel 🇲🇽

58,707 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "This is not a country that is going to require money from the United States to rebuild, to stabilize the transition ... We are not spending any money on Venezuela right now other than whatever it costs to stand up our embassy."
0:59

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "This is not a country that is going to require money from the United States to rebuild, to stabilize the transition ... We are not spending any money on Venezuela right now other than whatever it costs to stand up our embassy."

Department of State

152,668 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten