Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Shadows gather as the next Great Game looms India does not separate the sub-conventional element from the conventional element, both in the defensive and offensive domains. This is dictated by a long-term strategy vis-à-vis Pakistan, which is based on national and regional ambitions. Meanwhile, Islamabad has largely separated the...

talhaahmad967's profile picture

Talha Ahmad

59,137 subscribers

91,126 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

BREAKING: ‘If Kabul is attacked the response will be in Islamabad’ said Mullah Yaqoob, Defence Minister of Afghanistan, adding that “the demand [by Pakistan] for us to label the TTP a terrorist organisation is based on ‘passionate imagination’ Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid, the acting minister of the Ministry of Defense of Afghanistan, has warned that any attack on Kabul would be met with retaliation against Islamabad, adding that Afghanistan is prepared for a prolonged conflict if necessary. Speaking in an interview with Tolo News, Mujahid claimed Afghan forces have inflicted significant losses on Pakistan, in response to the death of a single Afghan civilian. He stressed that Afghanistan does not seek war but would continue fighting if the conflict persists. “If they extend the war for ten years, we are ready to fight for ten years as well. We have no fear,” he said. Mujahid added that the Afghan government and people do not want war, but said tensions largely stem from disputes over the Durand Line. He also rejected labeling Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan as a terrorist group, saying such claims are “imaginary and unrealistic,” and describing it as a baseless demands that Pakistan is making from Afghanistan.
1:04

BREAKING: ‘If Kabul is attacked the response will be in Islamabad’ said Mullah Yaqoob, Defence Minister of Afghanistan, adding that “the demand [by Pakistan] for us to label the TTP a terrorist organisation is based on ‘passionate imagination’ Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid, the acting minister of the Ministry of Defense of Afghanistan, has warned that any attack on Kabul would be met with retaliation against Islamabad, adding that Afghanistan is prepared for a prolonged conflict if necessary. Speaking in an interview with Tolo News, Mujahid claimed Afghan forces have inflicted significant losses on Pakistan, in response to the death of a single Afghan civilian. He stressed that Afghanistan does not seek war but would continue fighting if the conflict persists. “If they extend the war for ten years, we are ready to fight for ten years as well. We have no fear,” he said. Mujahid added that the Afghan government and people do not want war, but said tensions largely stem from disputes over the Durand Line. He also rejected labeling Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan as a terrorist group, saying such claims are “imaginary and unrealistic,” and describing it as a baseless demands that Pakistan is making from Afghanistan.

The Khorasan Diary

215,264 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Masterful takedown by Dominique de Villepin, former French Prime Minister, of Macron's utterly irresponsible rhetoric on sending NATO ground troops to Ukraine (Villepin himself calls it irresponsible). I translated it in full, because I think it's so important people are aware of the extreme danger behind Macron's (and some other NATO leaders) attempt to escalate the conflict: "For this debate [over sending ground troops] to have been useful, it would have first been necessary for us to be able to answer 5 questions. Five risks associated with this escalation, this step we would be taking if we were to send ground troops, send fighters. Five risks. The first is the expansion of the conflict. If we send ground troops, do we know if on the Russian side others will send, on the other side, ground troops? Will we face African fighters, will we face Asian fighters, will we face Middle Eastern fighters in this global south that also wants to take on the West? First risk. [Host comments: This does not seem to me a favored scenario...] If Westerners, Europeans, French send troops there, don't you think that solidarity will also play on the Russian side? I think we still need to ask ourselves that question. In any case, our diplomacy has not done what it should have to isolate Russia. If Russia were isolated, we would know it... I think, by the way, that we are more isolated, unfortunately, than Russia. Second major question: new front. Risk of a new front. I warned, I was among the few voices to say 'be careful, Ukraine is a dangerous situation but what happens if another front opens?'. The front in Gaza and the Middle East has opened. But there are other fronts that can open: in Korea, in Africa... And so, are we going to wage war like this on all 5 continents? This reality must be taken into account: the world is not limited to the drama and tragedy of Ukraine. It turns out that America is a global power and that we claim to be a global power too, so we are concerned by the major balances and the order of the world, and unfortunately our diplomacy does not sufficiently take into account these disorders which concern the Congolese, the Sudanese, etc. Third risk which is important: the terrorist risk. I am not thinking of terrorism that would come from our opponents in Ukraine, I am thinking of opportunistic terrorism. When there are situations of this type of disorder, terrorism strikes. And I remind you: we have planned here in France not a year of war, but a year of celebrations. In a few months, we will commemorate the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings and delegations will come from all over the world. We are going to spend several months celebrating the Olympics. If we need to mobilize, let's mobilize, but maybe it should have been done a bit more: I don't see a war economy, the preparation of minds in terms of civil defense and hybrid warfare, I see nothing... You don't just pull the idea of going to war in Ukraine out of a hat without having prepared a little... Fourth risk: we are on the eve of an American election that will determine the new world order. It's a safe bet that we are heading for a new era of isolationism and protectionism like the world has never seen. We are seeing a split in this new world order between Trump and a China that has just celebrated the reunion of its parliament and is becoming more introverted, more focused on its security than ever. This is a general global context that must be taken into account. And then there's one last element that may be one of the most important, which is the nuclear risk. I know the good experts, the great experts who speak on this subject and I respect them immensely. But sending ground troops, fighters, places us in a situation in terms of deterrence that we have never known. Forty years of Cold War: the forces of the Warsaw Pact and NATO forces never clashed. And it's not by chance: it's because of a reality that relates to the grammar of nuclear. The rule of deterrence is based on the principle of mutual assured destruction. That is, if one uses the bomb and the other responds, we're all dead. [...] I think the nuclear grammar means that today the risk of NATO ground troops in Ukraine presents a risk and that this risk, for responsible powers, is unacceptable. I travel enough around the world to have observed something for 15 years: the use of nuclear weapons is based on political cultures, societal cultures, and civilizations. The world is changing and what seemed unthinkable 10 or 15 years ago appears today differently: the rhetoric of the enemy, the hatred of the other, has developed to a point where we live in an international community that may want to settle scores with the other. [...] Today, and I'm not just thinking of the Russians, let's not forget nuclear proliferation with countries like Pakistan and many others that now have nuclear weapons. And it is in this that the principle of responsibility is essential, and there is a rule that must be drawn from all this: the logic of force, when not controlled, leads to an escalation that can be deadly. This is what makes the situation in Ukraine a real danger and it's also what makes - because this principle of the logic of uncontrolled force I would gladly apply to the situation in Gaza - it's what makes the Israeli policy applied today to Gaza a real danger. Because there is no control over the use of force. And when you look [...] all fronts are linked, all crises are linked."
7:37

Masterful takedown by Dominique de Villepin, former French Prime Minister, of Macron's utterly irresponsible rhetoric on sending NATO ground troops to Ukraine (Villepin himself calls it irresponsible). I translated it in full, because I think it's so important people are aware of the extreme danger behind Macron's (and some other NATO leaders) attempt to escalate the conflict: "For this debate [over sending ground troops] to have been useful, it would have first been necessary for us to be able to answer 5 questions. Five risks associated with this escalation, this step we would be taking if we were to send ground troops, send fighters. Five risks. The first is the expansion of the conflict. If we send ground troops, do we know if on the Russian side others will send, on the other side, ground troops? Will we face African fighters, will we face Asian fighters, will we face Middle Eastern fighters in this global south that also wants to take on the West? First risk. [Host comments: This does not seem to me a favored scenario...] If Westerners, Europeans, French send troops there, don't you think that solidarity will also play on the Russian side? I think we still need to ask ourselves that question. In any case, our diplomacy has not done what it should have to isolate Russia. If Russia were isolated, we would know it... I think, by the way, that we are more isolated, unfortunately, than Russia. Second major question: new front. Risk of a new front. I warned, I was among the few voices to say 'be careful, Ukraine is a dangerous situation but what happens if another front opens?'. The front in Gaza and the Middle East has opened. But there are other fronts that can open: in Korea, in Africa... And so, are we going to wage war like this on all 5 continents? This reality must be taken into account: the world is not limited to the drama and tragedy of Ukraine. It turns out that America is a global power and that we claim to be a global power too, so we are concerned by the major balances and the order of the world, and unfortunately our diplomacy does not sufficiently take into account these disorders which concern the Congolese, the Sudanese, etc. Third risk which is important: the terrorist risk. I am not thinking of terrorism that would come from our opponents in Ukraine, I am thinking of opportunistic terrorism. When there are situations of this type of disorder, terrorism strikes. And I remind you: we have planned here in France not a year of war, but a year of celebrations. In a few months, we will commemorate the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings and delegations will come from all over the world. We are going to spend several months celebrating the Olympics. If we need to mobilize, let's mobilize, but maybe it should have been done a bit more: I don't see a war economy, the preparation of minds in terms of civil defense and hybrid warfare, I see nothing... You don't just pull the idea of going to war in Ukraine out of a hat without having prepared a little... Fourth risk: we are on the eve of an American election that will determine the new world order. It's a safe bet that we are heading for a new era of isolationism and protectionism like the world has never seen. We are seeing a split in this new world order between Trump and a China that has just celebrated the reunion of its parliament and is becoming more introverted, more focused on its security than ever. This is a general global context that must be taken into account. And then there's one last element that may be one of the most important, which is the nuclear risk. I know the good experts, the great experts who speak on this subject and I respect them immensely. But sending ground troops, fighters, places us in a situation in terms of deterrence that we have never known. Forty years of Cold War: the forces of the Warsaw Pact and NATO forces never clashed. And it's not by chance: it's because of a reality that relates to the grammar of nuclear. The rule of deterrence is based on the principle of mutual assured destruction. That is, if one uses the bomb and the other responds, we're all dead. [...] I think the nuclear grammar means that today the risk of NATO ground troops in Ukraine presents a risk and that this risk, for responsible powers, is unacceptable. I travel enough around the world to have observed something for 15 years: the use of nuclear weapons is based on political cultures, societal cultures, and civilizations. The world is changing and what seemed unthinkable 10 or 15 years ago appears today differently: the rhetoric of the enemy, the hatred of the other, has developed to a point where we live in an international community that may want to settle scores with the other. [...] Today, and I'm not just thinking of the Russians, let's not forget nuclear proliferation with countries like Pakistan and many others that now have nuclear weapons. And it is in this that the principle of responsibility is essential, and there is a rule that must be drawn from all this: the logic of force, when not controlled, leads to an escalation that can be deadly. This is what makes the situation in Ukraine a real danger and it's also what makes - because this principle of the logic of uncontrolled force I would gladly apply to the situation in Gaza - it's what makes the Israeli policy applied today to Gaza a real danger. Because there is no control over the use of force. And when you look [...] all fronts are linked, all crises are linked."

Arnaud Bertrand

846,373 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”
0:47

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”

Ryan Saavedra

18,751 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi | "The revolution India underwent in the last 20 years under PM Modi is spectacular. I know because I hear what the PM says: By 2047, you have to be number three in the world economy," says the Secretary of State of the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Władysław Teofil Bartoszewski. He says, "Our national airline, Polish airline LOT, would like to double the number of flights from seven times a week to 14 times a week. We fly directly to Delhi and to Mumbai. We are interested in increasing that... I remember as a child, India was a country which had a deficit of food, and now you are a net exporter of food. The revolution which India underwent in the last 20 years under Prime Minister Modi is spectacular. I know because I hear what the Prime Minister says: By 2047, you have to be number three in the world economy. It's an ambitious goal, but you are on the way. We certainly want to cooperate with you, especially on the high and new technologies... We want to cooperate on a variety of soft things, like more people studying the Indian culture and languages..."
3:31

#WATCH | Delhi | "The revolution India underwent in the last 20 years under PM Modi is spectacular. I know because I hear what the PM says: By 2047, you have to be number three in the world economy," says the Secretary of State of the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Władysław Teofil Bartoszewski. He says, "Our national airline, Polish airline LOT, would like to double the number of flights from seven times a week to 14 times a week. We fly directly to Delhi and to Mumbai. We are interested in increasing that... I remember as a child, India was a country which had a deficit of food, and now you are a net exporter of food. The revolution which India underwent in the last 20 years under Prime Minister Modi is spectacular. I know because I hear what the Prime Minister says: By 2047, you have to be number three in the world economy. It's an ambitious goal, but you are on the way. We certainly want to cooperate with you, especially on the high and new technologies... We want to cooperate on a variety of soft things, like more people studying the Indian culture and languages..."

ANI

29,650 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Responding to ANI's question regarding Operation Sindoor, Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi says, "As far as nuclear rhetoric is concerned, I would like to say that there was no discussion on nuclear in the DGMO talks and whatever nuclear rhetoric was given was given by the politicians or given by the local public in Pakistan. I have no indication that anything of that sort came from the military. When we talk about our role in this, and when we discuss what was said earlier, it was stated that the space for conventional operations is shrinking, and that we would go directly from sub-conventional to the nuclear domain. But this time, the action we took, especially the kind of firing that took place in Jammu and Kashmir, and the way we addressed it, and how we eliminated approximately 100 of their (Pakistan) personnel – all that action was taken because we expanded the conventional space. In those 88 hours, you saw that the army's mobilisation to expand the conventional space was such that if Pakistan made any mistake, we were fully prepared to launch ground operations..."
2:28

#WATCH | Delhi: Responding to ANI's question regarding Operation Sindoor, Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi says, "As far as nuclear rhetoric is concerned, I would like to say that there was no discussion on nuclear in the DGMO talks and whatever nuclear rhetoric was given was given by the politicians or given by the local public in Pakistan. I have no indication that anything of that sort came from the military. When we talk about our role in this, and when we discuss what was said earlier, it was stated that the space for conventional operations is shrinking, and that we would go directly from sub-conventional to the nuclear domain. But this time, the action we took, especially the kind of firing that took place in Jammu and Kashmir, and the way we addressed it, and how we eliminated approximately 100 of their (Pakistan) personnel – all that action was taken because we expanded the conventional space. In those 88 hours, you saw that the army's mobilisation to expand the conventional space was such that if Pakistan made any mistake, we were fully prepared to launch ground operations..."

ANI

20,363 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This morning, Modi government issued a statement in Hindi, which said that Narendra Modi clearly told Donald Trump that ‘he has no role in the ceasefire, and we do not accept any mediation. The ceasefire was not done because of trade.’ But within a few hours, Trump has now said "I stopped the war between India and Pakistan. I love Pakistan. Modi is a wonderful man. I talked to him last night. Now we will also sign a trade deal with him. Asim Munir was influential in stopping the war from Pakistan's side and Modi among others did so from India. But I stopped the war between India and Pakistan." This is indeed very puzzling. The Modi government is saying something else and Trump continues to be adamant on his own claim - which he has now made for the 15th time in the last 38 days. The reality is that the information about the ceasefire was first shared by Trump on X and not the Indian Government. Why is Narendra Modi not able to state openly all that he allegedly told Trump over the phone? India awaits answers. This is a matter of our national security and sovereignty and cannot be treated so recklessly.
0:35

This morning, Modi government issued a statement in Hindi, which said that Narendra Modi clearly told Donald Trump that ‘he has no role in the ceasefire, and we do not accept any mediation. The ceasefire was not done because of trade.’ But within a few hours, Trump has now said "I stopped the war between India and Pakistan. I love Pakistan. Modi is a wonderful man. I talked to him last night. Now we will also sign a trade deal with him. Asim Munir was influential in stopping the war from Pakistan's side and Modi among others did so from India. But I stopped the war between India and Pakistan." This is indeed very puzzling. The Modi government is saying something else and Trump continues to be adamant on his own claim - which he has now made for the 15th time in the last 38 days. The reality is that the information about the ceasefire was first shared by Trump on X and not the Indian Government. Why is Narendra Modi not able to state openly all that he allegedly told Trump over the phone? India awaits answers. This is a matter of our national security and sovereignty and cannot be treated so recklessly.

Congress

264,312 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇾🇪 Announce your surprise attack and you've already spent the surprise. Joe Kent says the mountains around Sana'a make a conventional push close to unwinnable, which is why he watches the alliances instead of the front lines: "Things in Yemen are always very tribal in nature. So I would think if there's going to be a surprise, it would be something along the lines of an element that had been with the Houthis that secured Sana'a defected." The city changes hands from the inside or it doesn't change hands. Joe Kent
1:03

🇾🇪 Announce your surprise attack and you've already spent the surprise. Joe Kent says the mountains around Sana'a make a conventional push close to unwinnable, which is why he watches the alliances instead of the front lines: "Things in Yemen are always very tribal in nature. So I would think if there's going to be a surprise, it would be something along the lines of an element that had been with the Houthis that secured Sana'a defected." The city changes hands from the inside or it doesn't change hands. Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

62,794 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

🚨🚨 HEZBOLLAH FINAL SPEECH | THREATENS ESCALATION FINAL PART OF HEZBOLLAH LEADER SPEECH - THREATENS ESCALATION AND REGIONAL WAR! HEZBOLLAH LEADER SPEECH KEY QUOTES (PART 8 - FINAL): - The Islamic resistance in Iraq has begun to bear its responsibility and announced that it may enter a new phase We must not despair of demanding responsibility for what is happening in Gaza - We have entered the battle since October 8th Yemeni missiles and marches will reach Eilat and Israeli military bases - We took note of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation, as did the whole world, and we quickly moved from one stage to another. - If we look at what is happening on the border objectively, we will find it very important and significant - What is happening on our Lebanese front is unprecedented in the history of the Israeli entity - We will not be satisfied with what is happening on our front in any case - Our operations on the border target enemy vehicles, soldiers, and equipment - The Islamic resistance in Lebanon has been waging a real battle since October 8 that only those who are actually present at the border can feel. - The Islamic resistance is waging a different battle in terms of its titles, tools, and targets - Approximately 57 martyrs, including the Phalange Brigades, in addition to the martyrs of the Al-Qassam and Al-Quds Brigades. - On Saturday, October 7, the enemy, according to his forces, started from the border with Lebanon to take them to Gaza in light of the state of moral collapse. - The Lebanese Front has relieved a large portion of the forces that were to be used to attack Gaza. The operations that began and escalated forced the enemy to keep its forces at the border and mobilize more of them. - The resistance front in Lebanon was able to attract a third of the Israeli army to the border with Lebanon - 43 settlements in northern occupied Palestine were evacuated due to our operations - The settlers evacuated from the north and south are putting pressure on the moral and economic levels. If our position of solidarity had been political, the Israelis would have been comfortable on the northern border and its forces would have gone to Gaza. - The operations on the border have created a state of anxiety, anticipation, and fear among the enemy leadership and even in Washington - There is concern that this front will spiral into a comprehensive war, and the enemy is taking every account of that - The possibility of the Lebanese front sliding into a wide battle is a realistic possibility - Israel must be concerned about the expansion of war and escalation - Our operations make the enemy calculate its steps towards Lebanon and it adjusts its pace for fear of deteriorating matters - Our daily operations on the border make the enemy a deterrent - Our operations tell the enemy that it will commit the greatest foolishness in the history of its existence if it attacks Lebanon - Our operations and the sacrifices of our people are an expression of our solidarity with Gaza to relieve pressure on its people - We were told from the day of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood that the American fleets would bomb us and came for us - Our front is a front of solidarity with Gaza and it develops and moves according to developments there. - The enemy’s behavior towards Lebanon is a determinant of our movements, and this will return us to the rule of civilian versus civilian. - All possibilities on our Lebanese front are open - All options are on the table and we can go to them at any time - Threats and intimidation against us and the resistance fighters in our region are of no use - We must all be ready for all possibilities and options - We received messages that America will bomb Iran if we continue our operations in the south - Those who defeated you in the early 1980s are still alive, and with them today are their children and grandchildren - You can stop the aggression against Gaza because it is your aggression, and whoever wants to prevent a regional war must hasten to stop this aggression. - In the event of any regional war, your interests and soldiers will be the victim and the biggest loser. - We have made 'preparations' for the American ships, and we ask America to remember their defeats in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon - America has sent us messages, that they will bomb Iran if we continue. How dare you threaten our resistance? Your ships in the Mediterranean don't scare us, and be sure that we made preparations for them - I assure the Americans, in case of a regional war, their ships and the air force will pay a heavy price - Our battle has not reached the stage of victory by knockout, but we are winning with points - On the horizon, we are all fighting a battle of steadfastness. Our battle has not reached the stage of victory by knockout, and we still need time, but we are winning. - We must work for Gaza to be victorious and for the resistance to be victorious in Gaza - We still need time, but we will win with points. This is how we won in 2006 in Gaza, and this is how the resistance in the West Bank achieved achievements - I say to our people in Gaza and the West Bank and to all oppressed peoples that patience will result in victory. - We bear responsibility, and our steadfastness and patience will result in certain victory, God willing. - We have a belief in God's promise, that he will make the believers victorious, and God always fulfills his promise
1:19

🚨🚨 HEZBOLLAH FINAL SPEECH | THREATENS ESCALATION FINAL PART OF HEZBOLLAH LEADER SPEECH - THREATENS ESCALATION AND REGIONAL WAR! HEZBOLLAH LEADER SPEECH KEY QUOTES (PART 8 - FINAL): - The Islamic resistance in Iraq has begun to bear its responsibility and announced that it may enter a new phase We must not despair of demanding responsibility for what is happening in Gaza - We have entered the battle since October 8th Yemeni missiles and marches will reach Eilat and Israeli military bases - We took note of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation, as did the whole world, and we quickly moved from one stage to another. - If we look at what is happening on the border objectively, we will find it very important and significant - What is happening on our Lebanese front is unprecedented in the history of the Israeli entity - We will not be satisfied with what is happening on our front in any case - Our operations on the border target enemy vehicles, soldiers, and equipment - The Islamic resistance in Lebanon has been waging a real battle since October 8 that only those who are actually present at the border can feel. - The Islamic resistance is waging a different battle in terms of its titles, tools, and targets - Approximately 57 martyrs, including the Phalange Brigades, in addition to the martyrs of the Al-Qassam and Al-Quds Brigades. - On Saturday, October 7, the enemy, according to his forces, started from the border with Lebanon to take them to Gaza in light of the state of moral collapse. - The Lebanese Front has relieved a large portion of the forces that were to be used to attack Gaza. The operations that began and escalated forced the enemy to keep its forces at the border and mobilize more of them. - The resistance front in Lebanon was able to attract a third of the Israeli army to the border with Lebanon - 43 settlements in northern occupied Palestine were evacuated due to our operations - The settlers evacuated from the north and south are putting pressure on the moral and economic levels. If our position of solidarity had been political, the Israelis would have been comfortable on the northern border and its forces would have gone to Gaza. - The operations on the border have created a state of anxiety, anticipation, and fear among the enemy leadership and even in Washington - There is concern that this front will spiral into a comprehensive war, and the enemy is taking every account of that - The possibility of the Lebanese front sliding into a wide battle is a realistic possibility - Israel must be concerned about the expansion of war and escalation - Our operations make the enemy calculate its steps towards Lebanon and it adjusts its pace for fear of deteriorating matters - Our daily operations on the border make the enemy a deterrent - Our operations tell the enemy that it will commit the greatest foolishness in the history of its existence if it attacks Lebanon - Our operations and the sacrifices of our people are an expression of our solidarity with Gaza to relieve pressure on its people - We were told from the day of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood that the American fleets would bomb us and came for us - Our front is a front of solidarity with Gaza and it develops and moves according to developments there. - The enemy’s behavior towards Lebanon is a determinant of our movements, and this will return us to the rule of civilian versus civilian. - All possibilities on our Lebanese front are open - All options are on the table and we can go to them at any time - Threats and intimidation against us and the resistance fighters in our region are of no use - We must all be ready for all possibilities and options - We received messages that America will bomb Iran if we continue our operations in the south - Those who defeated you in the early 1980s are still alive, and with them today are their children and grandchildren - You can stop the aggression against Gaza because it is your aggression, and whoever wants to prevent a regional war must hasten to stop this aggression. - In the event of any regional war, your interests and soldiers will be the victim and the biggest loser. - We have made 'preparations' for the American ships, and we ask America to remember their defeats in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon - America has sent us messages, that they will bomb Iran if we continue. How dare you threaten our resistance? Your ships in the Mediterranean don't scare us, and be sure that we made preparations for them - I assure the Americans, in case of a regional war, their ships and the air force will pay a heavy price - Our battle has not reached the stage of victory by knockout, but we are winning with points - On the horizon, we are all fighting a battle of steadfastness. Our battle has not reached the stage of victory by knockout, and we still need time, but we are winning. - We must work for Gaza to be victorious and for the resistance to be victorious in Gaza - We still need time, but we will win with points. This is how we won in 2006 in Gaza, and this is how the resistance in the West Bank achieved achievements - I say to our people in Gaza and the West Bank and to all oppressed peoples that patience will result in victory. - We bear responsibility, and our steadfastness and patience will result in certain victory, God willing. - We have a belief in God's promise, that he will make the believers victorious, and God always fulfills his promise

Mario Nawfal

2,194,010 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Steve Jobs on startup hustle: "One of the things I don't see is, I don't see it myself, I don't see it in enough of the rest of us, is I don't see that startup hustle. In other words, if we zoom out at the big picture, it would be a shame to have lost the war because we've won a few battles. And I sort of feel like I and some of the rest of us are concentrating too much on the smaller battles. And we're not keeping the war in perspective. And the war is called survival. The war is called not run out of money until we get our product on the market."
0:29

Steve Jobs on startup hustle: "One of the things I don't see is, I don't see it myself, I don't see it in enough of the rest of us, is I don't see that startup hustle. In other words, if we zoom out at the big picture, it would be a shame to have lost the war because we've won a few battles. And I sort of feel like I and some of the rest of us are concentrating too much on the smaller battles. And we're not keeping the war in perspective. And the war is called survival. The war is called not run out of money until we get our product on the market."

Founder Mode

109,619 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This is hands-down the best explanation I've heard on why sanctions on Russia backfired, and why they were never going to succeed in the first place. By economist James K. Galbraith, professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Best quote of his explanation: "This is a situation in which the sanctions were imposed by one important sector of the world economy which then cut itself off from resources that it needs - and that's particularly true of Western Europe - in return for cutting Russia off from various things that Russia doesn't really need." Second best quote: "If you go back to the period before the introduction of the sanctions [...] the Russian economy was very heavily colonized by Western firms. That was true in automobiles, it was true in aircrafts, it was true in everything from fast food restaurants to big box stores. Western firms were present all throughout the Russian economy. A great many of them [...] either chose to exit Russia or were pressured to exit Russia after early 2022. So on what terms did they leave? Well, they were required, if they were leaving permanently, to sell their capital equipment, their factories and so forth, to let's say a Russian business which would get a loan from Russian banks or maybe have other sources of financing, at a very favorable price for the Russians. So effectively a lot of capital wealth, which was partly owned by the West, has been transferred to Russian ownership. And you now have an economy which is moving forward and has the advantage compared to Europe of relatively low resource costs because Russia is a great producer of resources, oil and gas and fertilizer and food stuff and so forth. And so while the Europeans are paying maybe twice in Germany what they were paying for energy, the Russians are not, they're paying perhaps less than they were paying before the war. So again I characterize the effect of the sanctions, in fact as being in certain respects a gift to the Russian economy. And this is, I think, quite different from what the authors of the sanctions expected. [...] And the essence of the situation is this would not have happened without the sanctions. You could have had the war, and it would have gone pretty much as it has gone. But the Russian government in 2022 was in no position to force the exit of Western firms. It didn't want to, wouldn't have done that. It was in no position to force its oligarchs to choose between Russia and the West. It didn't wish to do that. These choices were imposed by the West, and the results were actually, in many respects, favorable to the long-term independent development of the Russian Federation's economy."
12:09

This is hands-down the best explanation I've heard on why sanctions on Russia backfired, and why they were never going to succeed in the first place. By economist James K. Galbraith, professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Best quote of his explanation: "This is a situation in which the sanctions were imposed by one important sector of the world economy which then cut itself off from resources that it needs - and that's particularly true of Western Europe - in return for cutting Russia off from various things that Russia doesn't really need." Second best quote: "If you go back to the period before the introduction of the sanctions [...] the Russian economy was very heavily colonized by Western firms. That was true in automobiles, it was true in aircrafts, it was true in everything from fast food restaurants to big box stores. Western firms were present all throughout the Russian economy. A great many of them [...] either chose to exit Russia or were pressured to exit Russia after early 2022. So on what terms did they leave? Well, they were required, if they were leaving permanently, to sell their capital equipment, their factories and so forth, to let's say a Russian business which would get a loan from Russian banks or maybe have other sources of financing, at a very favorable price for the Russians. So effectively a lot of capital wealth, which was partly owned by the West, has been transferred to Russian ownership. And you now have an economy which is moving forward and has the advantage compared to Europe of relatively low resource costs because Russia is a great producer of resources, oil and gas and fertilizer and food stuff and so forth. And so while the Europeans are paying maybe twice in Germany what they were paying for energy, the Russians are not, they're paying perhaps less than they were paying before the war. So again I characterize the effect of the sanctions, in fact as being in certain respects a gift to the Russian economy. And this is, I think, quite different from what the authors of the sanctions expected. [...] And the essence of the situation is this would not have happened without the sanctions. You could have had the war, and it would have gone pretty much as it has gone. But the Russian government in 2022 was in no position to force the exit of Western firms. It didn't want to, wouldn't have done that. It was in no position to force its oligarchs to choose between Russia and the West. It didn't wish to do that. These choices were imposed by the West, and the results were actually, in many respects, favorable to the long-term independent development of the Russian Federation's economy."

Arnaud Bertrand

988,108 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

What is the likelihood that the Resistance Front will carry out ground attacks on American bases? Iranian General Jabari, advisor to the Supreme Commander of the Revolutionary Guard: 🔹 “It depends on the conditions of the war. In the past year or two, our brothers in Yemen have repeatedly asked our martyr Imam: ‘Allow us, with all possible means and regional support, to enter both Lebanon and Palestine.’ The Resistance Front is ready. If the war continues and their bases are destroyed, conditions will surely be created for the fighters of the Resistance Front to enter the occupied territories (Palestine).”
1:33

What is the likelihood that the Resistance Front will carry out ground attacks on American bases? Iranian General Jabari, advisor to the Supreme Commander of the Revolutionary Guard: 🔹 “It depends on the conditions of the war. In the past year or two, our brothers in Yemen have repeatedly asked our martyr Imam: ‘Allow us, with all possible means and regional support, to enter both Lebanon and Palestine.’ The Resistance Front is ready. If the war continues and their bases are destroyed, conditions will surely be created for the fighters of the Resistance Front to enter the occupied territories (Palestine).”

S p r i n t e r

43,015 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#WATCH | Bogotá, Colombia | MP Shashi Tharoor says, "The Indus Waters Treaty was one that was offered by India to Pakistan in the early 1960s in a spirit of goodwill and harmony. In fact, those words occur in the preamble of the treaty; sadly, that goodwill has been repeatedly betrayed by the terrorist actions of the last four decades. Even though we have had terrorism and war inflicted on us, the treaty has remained in place, but this time our government has placed the treaty in abeyance, which means it is in effect suspended. Its operations are suspended until such time as we get satisfactory indication from Pakistan that they're prepared to conduct themselves in that spirit of goodwill that is provided for in the preamble of the treaty. We are very conscious that we have been a generous neighbour when it comes to the operation of the treaty. We are in an upper riparian state. We have given Pakistan very generously the waters that they are entitled to under the treaty, and we have not even used all the waters we are entitled to under the treaty. But the time for acting on the basis of goodwill unilaterally is frankly no longer with us..." Courtesy ANI . Office of Dr Shashi Tharoor Shashi Tharoor
3:32

#WATCH | Bogotá, Colombia | MP Shashi Tharoor says, "The Indus Waters Treaty was one that was offered by India to Pakistan in the early 1960s in a spirit of goodwill and harmony. In fact, those words occur in the preamble of the treaty; sadly, that goodwill has been repeatedly betrayed by the terrorist actions of the last four decades. Even though we have had terrorism and war inflicted on us, the treaty has remained in place, but this time our government has placed the treaty in abeyance, which means it is in effect suspended. Its operations are suspended until such time as we get satisfactory indication from Pakistan that they're prepared to conduct themselves in that spirit of goodwill that is provided for in the preamble of the treaty. We are very conscious that we have been a generous neighbour when it comes to the operation of the treaty. We are in an upper riparian state. We have given Pakistan very generously the waters that they are entitled to under the treaty, and we have not even used all the waters we are entitled to under the treaty. But the time for acting on the basis of goodwill unilaterally is frankly no longer with us..." Courtesy ANI . Office of Dr Shashi Tharoor Shashi Tharoor

Tharoorian

286,683 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

#WATCH | Delhi | Former CDS Anil Chauhan says, "Pakistan will remain a major security concern and a threat for time to come... The idea of Pakistan has been to reduce space for conventional operations and expand the space for sub-conventional operations, that is terrorism and cross-border activities and reduce the space for conventional operations due to nuclear weapons... Terrorism and proxy war will remain a major challenge for us and the only way you can defeat it is to create credible deterrence and that is what we demonstrated in 3 cross-border operations: Uri, Balakot and then Operation Sindoor... India must be able to raise the cost of proxy war and terrorism for Pakistan so that it stops using this as an instrument of state policy. Operation Sindoor, holding of India-Pakistan Treaty in abeyance and some practical measures may hopefully change or induce behavioural change in a neighbour. But we have also seen some kind of agreements and accords which they have recently signed. They sometimes, I feel may induce some kind of overconfidence in Pakistan and they may make some kind of miscalculation again..."
2:41

#WATCH | Delhi | Former CDS Anil Chauhan says, "Pakistan will remain a major security concern and a threat for time to come... The idea of Pakistan has been to reduce space for conventional operations and expand the space for sub-conventional operations, that is terrorism and cross-border activities and reduce the space for conventional operations due to nuclear weapons... Terrorism and proxy war will remain a major challenge for us and the only way you can defeat it is to create credible deterrence and that is what we demonstrated in 3 cross-border operations: Uri, Balakot and then Operation Sindoor... India must be able to raise the cost of proxy war and terrorism for Pakistan so that it stops using this as an instrument of state policy. Operation Sindoor, holding of India-Pakistan Treaty in abeyance and some practical measures may hopefully change or induce behavioural change in a neighbour. But we have also seen some kind of agreements and accords which they have recently signed. They sometimes, I feel may induce some kind of overconfidence in Pakistan and they may make some kind of miscalculation again..."

ANI

104,780 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”
1:36

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”

BTC Clips

114,246 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨PAKISTAN🇵🇰 AND INDIA🇮🇳 AT WAR AGAIN ☢️ A Rutgers University study estimated that if India and Pakistan were to strike each other’s population centres with 250 nuclear weapons, with a yield of 100 kilotons each, an estimated 127 million people would be killed in South Asia from just the explosions, fires, and radiation. The long-term effects would be even more horrifying, 37 million tonnes of soot would be injected into the atmosphere, sending temperatures across the planet plunging by more than 5 degrees Celsius, resulting in a famine which would kill an estimated 2 billion people. The world is once again on the brink, thanks to a problem created by Britain when carving up colonial India. Billions of lives now have the nuclear Sword of Damocles having over their necks. Unless the great powers such as China🇨🇳 and Russia🇷🇺 can mediate, the nuclear nightmare may become a reality. As we speak, Pakistan and India continue to exchange fire with the hostilities escalating. The path to a multipolar world could face a serious setback with India and Pakistan destroying each other, undoing years of development and plunging the world into an abyss. China’s concern will be the CPEC, the 3000KM Chinese infrastructure network project which runs through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir that is an integral part of the historic Belt & Road Initiative. China will also be concerned with how its thawing relations with India will be affected, as India’s strikes could put China’s investments in Pakistan at risk. The US’🇺🇸 eyes will be on the growing military ties with India, and its bid to turn India into an ally against China, Washington’s next target for sabotage, war and destruction. The US also has close ties with the political and military elites of Pakistan, which aided many of Washington’s dirty wars. India and Pakistan annihilating each other may shift the balance of power back to the old colonial order, led by the US with its loyal vassals in the US, UK, and EU, the same colonial order despised by all in the region. The annihilation of both countries obviously is neither in the interests of India and Pakistan, and it is definitely not in the interests of the multipolar world, which billions around the world need for real economic development, prosperity and security. Let’s hope India and Pakistan step back from the brink of all-out destruction.
4:26

🚨PAKISTAN🇵🇰 AND INDIA🇮🇳 AT WAR AGAIN ☢️ A Rutgers University study estimated that if India and Pakistan were to strike each other’s population centres with 250 nuclear weapons, with a yield of 100 kilotons each, an estimated 127 million people would be killed in South Asia from just the explosions, fires, and radiation. The long-term effects would be even more horrifying, 37 million tonnes of soot would be injected into the atmosphere, sending temperatures across the planet plunging by more than 5 degrees Celsius, resulting in a famine which would kill an estimated 2 billion people. The world is once again on the brink, thanks to a problem created by Britain when carving up colonial India. Billions of lives now have the nuclear Sword of Damocles having over their necks. Unless the great powers such as China🇨🇳 and Russia🇷🇺 can mediate, the nuclear nightmare may become a reality. As we speak, Pakistan and India continue to exchange fire with the hostilities escalating. The path to a multipolar world could face a serious setback with India and Pakistan destroying each other, undoing years of development and plunging the world into an abyss. China’s concern will be the CPEC, the 3000KM Chinese infrastructure network project which runs through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir that is an integral part of the historic Belt & Road Initiative. China will also be concerned with how its thawing relations with India will be affected, as India’s strikes could put China’s investments in Pakistan at risk. The US’🇺🇸 eyes will be on the growing military ties with India, and its bid to turn India into an ally against China, Washington’s next target for sabotage, war and destruction. The US also has close ties with the political and military elites of Pakistan, which aided many of Washington’s dirty wars. India and Pakistan annihilating each other may shift the balance of power back to the old colonial order, led by the US with its loyal vassals in the US, UK, and EU, the same colonial order despised by all in the region. The annihilation of both countries obviously is neither in the interests of India and Pakistan, and it is definitely not in the interests of the multipolar world, which billions around the world need for real economic development, prosperity and security. Let’s hope India and Pakistan step back from the brink of all-out destruction.

Afshin Rattansi

46,154 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

For months, I’ve been reporting on a shift in strategy: instead of fighting on the front lines, Ukraine — backed by Europe — has been striking civilian targets inside Russia. Schools. Buses. Apartment buildings. Infrastructure. The goal is to terrorize the Russian public. And how does the Western media cover it? As a "brilliant new military strategy." If any other country was deliberately bombing civilians, it would be called terrorism. But because it’s Ukraine, the media excuses it. As a journalist, the hypocrisy is sickening.
1:26

For months, I’ve been reporting on a shift in strategy: instead of fighting on the front lines, Ukraine — backed by Europe — has been striking civilian targets inside Russia. Schools. Buses. Apartment buildings. Infrastructure. The goal is to terrorize the Russian public. And how does the Western media cover it? As a "brilliant new military strategy." If any other country was deliberately bombing civilians, it would be called terrorism. But because it’s Ukraine, the media excuses it. As a journalist, the hypocrisy is sickening.

Rick Sanchez

21,920 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce