正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Shark-Dragon by Imaginary Creature Factory floaties and scientific Squidge testing. Subject passws with flying colours! Recommendation: Order one quick before they float away!

11,713 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

5 条评论

Sypheryan 的头像
Sypheryan2 年前

Just try to resist the 🦈🐉Shark Dragon Belly 🥰(@FactoryCreature Order form linked above - get one quick, time is running out!)

Sypheryan 的头像
Sypheryan2 年前

Quick folks, don't leave this lovely creature all alone, snaffle your Shark Dragon before its too late, see the links above to my friends at @FactoryCreature order form

Page to Pixel Publishing 的头像
Page to Pixel Publishing2 年前

Boost, surf, and weave your way through The Art of Flight, an arcade game about flying multiple ships at the same time. With solo, local co-op, and a leaderboard, there are tons of ways to play. Wishlist on Steam today!

draufleger 的头像
draufleger2 年前

@FactoryCreature I wish I would have one but that's waaaaaaay to much money for me sadly. Well I have to get rich so it doesn't bother me to buy something that expensive. But I have to say it is so cute

Nevin the fox 的头像
Nevin the fox2 年前

@FactoryCreature Love the sounds inflatables make

相关视频

For anyone losing their minds claiming Karen Read "purposely factory reset her phone," or "Karen Read destroyed evidence during a lawful search and seizure", let’s revisit Brian Albert’s phone “upgrade.” On September 23, 2022, Brian Albert was served a preservation order by the Commonwealth for his cell phone used between January 28 – February 28, 2022, ordering him not to manipulate or destroy any electronic data on that device. ✨ The Commonwealth confirmed this preservation order was sent to Albert. ✨ See stipulation from Brian's testimony during trial 1. During cross-examination by Attorney Alan Jackson, after being reminded of the exact dates, Albert suddenly recalled the precise day he traded in his phone: September 22 - the day before the preservation order was issued. This "upgrade" date was never confirmed by any record. We have no evidence of when exactly Brian did this. Albert also testified that he later participated in a conference call with the DA’s Office, was reminded of the preservation order by ADA Adam Lally, and did not disclose that he was no longer in possession of the phone at issue. By contrast: 🔹️Karen Read was never served a preservation order. 🔹️Massachusetts State Police arrived unexpectedly with a search warrant for her phones. 🔹️She had no notice they were coming before they showed up or that they wanted her phones until they entered her home. 🔹️She was under no legal obligation to preserve her device ✨️before✨️ they showed and turned over both phones once the warrant was presented. Thus meaning ➡️ Karen Read did not destroy evidence as the police received the phones as-is once the warrants were served. If she had, it is with no doubt the DA's office would've charged her with a felony as she already had pending murders charges. It's important to note that Karen Read has never been charged, alleged or been alluded to by prosecutors that she had an intent to destroy any evidence. Brian Albert, on the other hand, was served a preservation order, confirmed by prosecutors, and seemingly did not abide by it. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. 🐥

BoozeyBeauty

39,904 次观看 • 7 个月前

Tired of seeing the same benchmarks around local models? I ran Poolside’s Laguna S 2.1 locally on a single NVIDIA DGX Spark. I gave it a simulated problem inside an electric vehicle battery factory. One of the machines kept producing parts with bad torque readings. The robot’s power usage and vibration were slowly increasing, but not enough to trigger any alarms. Maintenance thought the robot was failing. Production thought the factory was receiving defective parts. Meanwhile, more products were being rejected and the production line was starting to back up. Laguna reviewed the factory sensor data, worker notes, maintenance manuals, machine limits, quality records and the production schedule. It ruled out the incoming parts and found that several small warning signs pointed to a worn spindle bearing. Before changing anything, it tested a solution inside a digital factory simulation. It rerouted production to a backup machine, checked the results and then stopped to ask for human approval before continuing. The results: OEE improved from 71.4% to 93.1% Torque rejects dropped from 8.4% to 1.1% The production queue dropped from 18 packs to 5 The factory itself was simulated. The model run, tool calls and investigation were real and happened locally on one DGX Spark. This is not about letting AI control a factory by itself. It is about giving people another tool to understand complicated problems faster, connect signals they might normally miss and test possible solutions before touching the real production line. Really interesting work from Poolside, Eiso Kant and Jason Warner.

Joey

11,000 次观看 • 26 天前