正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Sharri Markson has lashed out at Sussan Ley’s claim that she hates both her & PM Albanese, insisting it’s only “half true” bcoz she only hates the Prime Minister. Rightttt.🙄🤣🤦‍♂️ Openly biased? Or lying? Either is bad. #SkyAfterDark

23,805 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

AOC has been sick for a while now. She sounds terrible. How many jabs did she get? She posted this video on Thursday talking about not having health insurance while she was a waitress because it was too expensive. AOC had access to Obamacare for years while she was a waitress. So why didn’t she take advantage of it? As a politician, AOC has strongly defended Obamacare. If Obamacare is so great, why wasn’t she on it when she was a waitress? The answer is AOC has been caught lying again. Either she’s lying about not having health insurance when she was a waitress or she’s lying about Obamacare being great. Both can’t be true. If Obamacare is great, then she lied about not being able to afford health insurance. If Obamacare sucks, then she lied about it being great. Here’s AOC’s new quote about not having health insurance (she says people she worked with didn’t have it either): “It really wasn’t that long ago that I didn’t have any health insurance at all when I was a waitress, and that I couldn’t afford health insurance so I just went without. And, frankly, no one I knew that I worked with had health insurance either because they couldn’t afford it either.” The truth likely is that AOC didn’t have health insurance until around when she got elected to Congress and that’s because Obamacare does suck. Which means the truth also is AOC has been lying to the American people for many years now about Obamacare being great. Now—how many jabs did AOC get and has she been getting boosters? Because she ain’t looking good. (aoc on TT)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

466,128 次观看 • 4 个月前

🔥 Candace Owens is PANICKING. Going through a section of the lawsuit Brian Harpole filed against her, she highlights three different times she texted him to confirm or deny Mitch Snow’s claims - AFTER the interview had already aired. In those messages, she says she was “only interested in the truth.” But if that were actually the case, she might’ve checked with Brian before putting Mitch on her show to push a false narrative. Minor detail, apparently. Instead, she only reached out once legal consequences were on the table. She even laughs at the reason Brian gave for ignoring her - basically that he didn’t want to hand her more material to profit from. Which… yes. That would be the correct instinct. It’s kind of incredible that her version of “fact-checking” seems to be: launch a wild claim, present it as truth, and then demand the target of the insane claim clean it up afterward. And if they don’t? Well, obviously they’re guilty. Not her. Newsflash: people do NOT owe Candace Owens - or her unhinged mob of desperate housewives audience - anything. And Brian Harpole’s situation makes it pretty clear why so many people she targets avoid responding privately in the first place - as they should. Because let’s be honest: anything they say would absolutely be twisted into something it’s not, or repackaged as a convenient “gotcha.” At that point, staying silent privately and speaking publicly (if at all) isn’t avoidance - it’s strategy. It’s control. Brian absolutely made the right call ignoring her texts. And the reasoning he gave lines up perfectly with a pattern of behavior by a deranged psychopath that shows she’s not interested in what’s true at all… and only interested in what gets views and clicks.

OutspokenSamantha

51,302 次观看 • 3 个月前