Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 SHE ABSOLUTELY NAILS IT! 🫳🏼🎤 “This is how you know that the Democrats have literally turned into subhuman creatures. Their hatred for President Donald Trump outweighs the respect that you should have as a human being for a woman who entered this country to work harder, to make...

44,449 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Former Seattle Fox reporter Brandi Kruse admits to President Trump that she is "living proof that you can recover from TDS" and then proceeds to completely destroy the legacy media in the room... "I was told by probably a dozen people not to tell you this. I'm going to tell it to you anyway, because it's relevant to what we're talking about. I'm living proof that you can recover from TDS. I had strong Trump derangement syndrome for probably eight years. This is one of the reasons I recovered from it. And by the way, it's much better to not have TDS. I'm happier. I'm healthier. More successful. I even think I got a little more attractive after I got rid of my Trump derangement syndrome. I'm a reporter in Seattle, and frankly, I could not care any less what any of you have to say about this meeting. Could not care any less. We're not here for you. I'm not here to convince any of you that Antifa is a real thing, because if you have not come to that conclusion by now, you are never going to come to that conclusion, because you don't want to see it. And you're going to go and you're going to say it's a bunch of right-wing conservative influencers who are here spinning a tale. I was one of you. I was a mainstream reporter in Seattle for 10 years. I was a TV reporter on the streets doing my job, and I was still assaulted by Antifa. So it's not about being conservative. It's about people who go there and show what they're doing. And when I saw after all those years that the media wouldn't be honest about what was happening, that Democratic politicians wouldn't be honest about what was happening, I thought, well, gosh, if they're not being honest about that, maybe they're not being honest about President Trump either. And it opened my mind to just looking at things for what they were. And now I find you quite funny, actually. Now I'm much happier about it. But for me, again, I could not care any less the stories that they go to print." BRAVO 👏👏👏

NewsTreason Channel 17

10,461 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rep. Byron Donalds says the Democrat hysteria has NOTHING to do with Venezuela — and everything to do with hating Trump. Donalds draws a hard line: opposing Trump is one thing. Defending a brutal narco-dictator is something else entirely. HURT: “It is remarkable, Congressman, to listen to all of these Democrats who are coming out of the woodwork who are suddenly all about domestic prosperity and America first.” DONALDS: “No, they’re not. They’re just about opposing Trump, that’s what they’re about.” “I don’t care what the Democrats have to say about this. If you have the socialist wing of the Democrat Party who is only interested in trying to protect a narco socialist, in Nicolas Maduro, then that demonstrates the depth of their insanity when it comes to…America political cohesion.” “If you don’t want to agree with Donald Trump, that’s your business on the Democratic left.” “But to basically back up a narco terrorist, who was either poisoning or killing the American people with drug interdictions into the United States, somebody who clearly was using Venezuela as a tipping point for his own cartel, somebody who’s been in bed with China and our other adversaries around the globe, and that socialist regime that was continued by Maduro, started by Hugo Chavez, destroyed the country of Venezuela…” “For the Democrats to be worried about this, is ridiculous.” “Last thing people need to understand, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris put a $25 million bounty on Nicolas Maduro on their way out the door.” “So what are they complaining about?”

Overton

25,059 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 SCOTT JENNINGS TRUTH NUKES CNN: "The data is clear and our eyes and ears don’t lie: Democrats, sadly, HATE America — Republicans love it. Trump is right to lean into his patriotism for America 250!" 🇺🇸 "We have a patriotism gap in this country. Republicans love this country. They're patriotic about this country and Democrats aren't. They just aren't!" "They're not proud to be Americans and therefore they're not interested in celebrating America's 250th birthday and it only gets all about Donald Trump." "This has been a steady downward trend for the last 25 years and it's sad. But we've got two parties in this country. One loves it and one appears to be hating it more and more by the year and I think that is a sad thing." "We live in the greatest country in the world. The president proclaims that message all the time and that's something that ought to unify all Americans, but Democrats just can't seem to get behind it!" Q: Scott, isn't the president proclaiming his face all the time? JENNINGS: "I would encourage you to listen to some of the interviews that have been given by the Democrat candidates who have recently won primaries and I would encourage you to read the polling that's come out just this week." "In the last few days from the Gallup Organization about the patriotism gap that exists. I'm sorry to tell you, Republicans love this country and they always love it no matter who's in charge. And look, yes, Donald Trump has put his picture on things." "I hate to break the news. He's a president United States and he's going to be part of things going on with our government!" "And our government should be doing things to celebrate the country's 250th birthday and he's the president and he's going to be part of it."

Eric Daugherty

39,421 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Asmongold explains why he's happy that the Democratic Party is being taken over by the DSA, says they get what they deserve for creating a "Frankenstein monster" "I'm very happy about this..the democrat party is being totally taken over by a bunch of radical communists and socialists..by race communism and other bs..quite funny..I told ppl this was going to happen..this is the new party of the left" "I'm happy bc this is a very easy group to other, to demonize, and to take action against and also they don't really appeal to the average, like they appeal to democrats, they're gonna win democrat primaries..bc there is no cohesive ideology that the democrats exist around" "None of these ppl should be in the country btw..the democrats deserve this..they have played footsie with these freaks for 15 yrs, ever since Occupy Wallstreet..completely shifted away from class warfare and class issues to identity issues..u brought these ppl into the country..finally Dr Frankenstein's monster is attacking u" "They have created a Frankenstein monster out of disaffected college kids, terr*rist supporters, illegal aliens, basically non westerners who hate the west, political Islam and communism and socialism and Marxism..put them together into one conglomerate" "Nothing the democrat party really stands for..only thing, whatever Trump isn't..I will say the DSA has a cohesive vision that I completely disagree with and I want to deport almost every single one..but I respect the fact that they have an idea, a vision, a plan..Democrats can't say they have a plan, a vision..it's going to ruin them"

yeet

63,569 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

Curtis Houck

19,488 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

ABC’s Jonathan Karl: “I want to ask you about that $1.8 billion fund set up — weaponization fund it’s being called. Why should taxpayers be paying to settle a $10 billion lawsuit that was brought by the President of the United States? And should people that attacked the Capitol building and assaulted police officers, should they be eligible? Should they receive money? Should they receive money from this fund?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Well, let me say a couple things about that. First, Jon, I think, in some ways, the media has misrepresented what this is actually about. This is about compensating Americans for the lawfare that we saw under the last administration. And by the way, anybody can apply for it. Republicans can apply for it. Democrats can apply for it. As you know, the President of the United States has pardoned a number of Democrats who he felt were actually subject to this lawfare. I mean, if Hunter Biden wants to apply for this particular fund, he is welcome to. It’s going to go through a normal process where we vet everything, where we try to identify whether people’s claims are actually legitimate. But — but — but here’s the question. You say, why should taxpayers fund this? Whenever the United States government incurs legal expenses, it pays out those legal expenses. When it — it’s settling a lawsuit, it pays out money to settle that lawsuit. And the question is, is a dollar of this money going to the Trump administration? No. Is a dollar of this money going to Donald Trump personally? No. Is a dollar of this money going to Donald Trump’s family? No. The people that would get the money are people, some of whom have been prosecuted completely disproportionate to any crime they’ve ever committed. Like, let’s just take a couple of examples. Tina Peters is this woman who is about to get out of prison, thanks in large part to the President’s good work in Colorado. This is a woman who, at worst, if you believe everything that the prosecutor said about her committed misdemeanor trespassing and somebody threw the book at her, this innocent grandmother was going to spend ten years in prison, completely disproportionate to any misdemeanor trespassing that I’ve ever seen. Was that fair? No. Is it reasonable for her to get some compensation for the fact that she was treated unfairly? I think the answer is yes. And I think that what we’re going to see, hopefully, is the entire country led by this Department of Justice, turning the page on the lawfare. What I would like to propose, and I think the Democrats, you know, hopefully they’re willing to meet us halfway here. I won’t hold my breath. But what I would propose is something very simple that if you are willing to turn the page on Joe Biden’s lawfare, why don’t we prosecute people — very simple principle — why don’t we prosecute people who violate the law? Let’s not prosecute people because they said the wrong thing, or because they had the wrong political candidate, or because they had the wrong viewpoint. And I think part of that — part of turning the page on that is to actually ensure the real victims of that lawfare receive some compensation. That’s what this fund is going to be targeted at. And again, there’s going to be a process to ensure that that money is only given to people who have actually, I hate to say, earned it, but the people who actually were really mistreated by the previous administration and Department of Justice.”

Curtis Houck

13,935 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Clarence Thomas: "as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks, who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree." Full transcript: "I think that this today is a travesty. I think that it is disgusting. I think that this hearing should never occur in America. This is a case in which this sleaze, this dirt, was searched for by staffers of members of this committee. Was then leaked to the media. And this committee, and this body, validated it. And displayed it at prime time over our entire nation. How would any member on this committee, any person in this room, or any person in this country, would like sleaze said about him or her in this fashion? Or this dirt dredged up in this gossip, and these lies displayed in this manner? How would any person like it? The Supreme Court is not worth it. No job is worth it. I'm not here for that. I'm here for my name, my family, my life, and my integrity. I think something is dreadfully wrong with this country. When any person, any person in this free country, would be subjected to this. This is not a closed room. There was an FBI investigation. This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately, or in a closed environment. This is a circus. It's a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks, who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree."

Apple Lamps

67,330 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten