Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

She definitely was interested in seeing this bbc 😈🍆😏 #bbc #storeflash #bigdick #bigdickbandit #bbcflash #latina #mexican #milf #cougar #thick #shopping #ass #bigbooty

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

#PostOfficeScandal The former General Counsel at the Post Office 'Jane Macleod' who refuses to co-operate with the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is challenged by BBC reporters Katy Watson & @esylltcarr BBC challenges ex-Post Office lawyer in Australia ‼️ The Post Office’s most senior in-house lawyer when it fought the landmark case brought by Alan Bates and other sub-postmasters has been challenged by BBC News in Australia (BBCaustralia ), after she refused to appear before the public inquiry into the Horizon scandal. A BBC team questioned Jane MacLeod, who was the Post Office’s General Counsel between 2015 and 2019, while she was walking her dog outside her home in Sydney. She replied with “no comment” when asked why she wasn’t attending. She had been due to give evidence this week. “It’s unsurprising, but it speaks volumes,” says Jo Hamilton (Jo Hamilton ), one of the wrongly convicted former sub-postmasters. “If she was determined to help the inquiry, she’d be there,” she added. 'An important witness' Born in Australia, Jane MacLeod returned to live there in 2020. Last month Sir Wyn Williams, chair of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry (Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry ), revealed that while Ms MacLeod had submitted a witness statement, she had decided not to give oral evidence, despite being asked to do so. The inquiry heard that the reason, offered by Ms MacLeod’s lawyers, was that given the passage of time, she considered her written statement was the best evidence she could offer. Since then, Ms MacLeod has not responded to BBC requests for comment. Sir Wyn said that even before seeing her written evidence, he’d decided that Ms MacLeod was “an important witness” from whom he wished to hear in person. He added that despite the offer to have her travel and accommodation expenses covered, Ms MacLeod “has made it clear that she will not co-operate with the inquiry by providing oral evidence”, either in person or via video-link. However, Sir Wyn explained that his options to force her to attend were limited because she lived abroad. Under the Inquiries Act 2005, witnesses can be legally compelled to give evidence – but this only applies to UK nationals. In her written statement to the inquiry, Ms MacLeod says: “I am very aware that the decisions in which I was involved during my time at Post Office Limited regarding the group litigation and the investigation of Horizon's performance and robustness have had implications for many sub-postmasters and their families.” She adds: “I regret that this has happened and apologise to those so affected for the adverse outcomes they have suffered.” She is so sorry, that she cannot be bothered to attend and face the music🎶 #MrBatesVsThePostOffice #MrBates #MrBatesVsPostOffice #MrBatesPBS #PostOfficeInquiry #MacLeod #JaneMacleod #awol Nick Wallis @GouldsBlog Rosie Brocklehurst Kate Osborne Marion Fellows Kevan Jones Darren Jones MP Jonathan Reynolds Prem Sikka Dan Neidle

Christopher Head OBE

41,615 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Motara is trending because again, twitter is dragging the influencer over the disturbing 2020 beggar video. It landed her a BBC interview. Actually, that video went viral in 2020 when she, Motara casually posted how her mom used to hawk while raise her, and now life is better. As she posted this on twitter, people who had her contact on WhatsApp, used the video to attack her. Apparently, Motara first posted the video on her WhatsApp for cruise, but her friends advised her to delete it because it was offensive. Unfortunately, some people already saved it. So when she came on twitter do the thanks giving of her mom, they quoted her with the video. Then it went viral. In the video Motara Lawrence was taunting a street beggar with a chilled energy drink through her car windows, as she moved in traffic, the kid followed her car and she continued the tease. Seeing how heavily social media criticized it, she instantly apologized again on Twitter, after the apology she made on WhatsApp. The dragging was intense it literally affected her mental health, and cost her some opportunities. It even landed her an interview with BBC. In her apology she explained that she was just playing with the girl and she wasn’t laughing at her. Instead, a lady in the background. That, she didn’t expect the girl to follow her after the traffic moved, but after the video ended, she gave the girl money. Seeing that her apology wasn’t enough, because people insisted she did it for the clout. And this was because, this was the period fearless energy drink was doing promotions. So… she actually went back to look for the girl to beg her, but alas the girl was no where to be found. Fast forward to 2025, Motara casually made another post asking tweeps to share the experience of classism. As expected, the unfortunate video resurfaced. Again, she apologized. This time, more people are on her side, unlike the first three to five times twitter have dragged her for the November 2020 incident. Many argue that, her apology wasn’t genuine, and even if it were, they do not accept it. Even during her wedding with Lawrence, the video was brought up. Motara has now relocated to UK., yet the nightmares of 2020 persists, without visa. It’s a classic case of “We forgive, but we will never forget.” • Get a fast USD card with PayPal integration only on GoPremium: USD & EUR Accounts. !! With realistic USD rates and zero monthly maintenance fees!

Trending Explained

32,079 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is Emma Barnett. Emma is a Jewish BBC host. Emma's father, Ian Barnett, was convicted and imprisoned for running prostitution brothels in Manchester, England. Emma's mother, Michele Barnett, was convicted of laundering the money from the family's brothel operation. Emma, while never convicted for direct involvement, was fully aware of the family business, openly discussing the “whores” with her father, while photos of the “whores” were kept in the family's lounge and piano room. In the aftermath of her parents convictions, however, she publicly feigned ignorance and played victim to the circumstances, calling it “the most painful chapter of my life.” Shocking, I know, that she'd be so transparently two-faced. Oh, wait. Here we see her two faces again, as she so readily ascribes “White privilege” to a guest while excoriating their “cavalier” word choice, then, in response to seeing “Jewish privilege” on X, she reengages victim mode and appeals to her audience's sympathies by whiningly asking, “Do you know that feels? Do you know how frightening that is? How angering that is?” Ah yes, Emma “The Eternal Victim” Barnett - millionaire BBC star living in London's posh Herne Hill neighborhood. Bludgeoning Whites for our “privilege;” recoiling in horror when the same is said of her people. This is your “media,” Western Man. In fact, I've never seen a better distillation of the essence of what our media class truly is than these two soundbites.

Daniel Concannon

537,780 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Each time I have guys over to chill and smoke I realize when they enter the building my neighbor’s front door keeps creaking…. I know it’s a couple that lives there so I’ve never thought to interact with someone so close to home 💀 then my dumb ass forgot my fucking keys over the weekend luckily her boyfriend was outside smoking so I asked if he could open the front door to the building he said cool 😫😫 then he’s like how are you gonna get in yo crib 🥲 my only other choice was to call my roommate and collect the keys from her then he said I can hack it for you I’m like cool soooooo he went for his things and we were talking he’s like why does he keep hearing girls moaning few nights I’m like it’s porn 😅 then he said if I’m jacking off with guys to porn Then I realized he was the one that keeps coming to the door… so I said yeah smtn like that He goes, “shiiiiitttt my bitch sleeping saying she tired and she didn’t work today she holding out on me bro..” So I’m like do I need to pay you for this he’s like naa just help me out when I forget my keys…. I decided cool he’s not that bad so he came in and I took a shower…. Then this happened #queens #borough #nyc #gayporn __________________________________________ Trailer version here… full video uploaded to my JFF catalog. Click the link 🔗 in my bio to see all my other full videos‼️ __________________________________________ #lingerie #femboy #bbw #babe #bbl #cd #fatass #bigass #analporn #anal #firsttime #dl #downlow #trade #blackcock #bbc #bigcock #femme #femboy #Femboy #bbw #ass #domtop #bbc #trade #lingerie #bigbooty
1:56

Sensitive content

Each time I have guys over to chill and smoke I realize when they enter the building my neighbor’s front door keeps creaking…. I know it’s a couple that lives there so I’ve never thought to interact with someone so close to home 💀 then my dumb ass forgot my fucking keys over the weekend luckily her boyfriend was outside smoking so I asked if he could open the front door to the building he said cool 😫😫 then he’s like how are you gonna get in yo crib 🥲 my only other choice was to call my roommate and collect the keys from her then he said I can hack it for you I’m like cool soooooo he went for his things and we were talking he’s like why does he keep hearing girls moaning few nights I’m like it’s porn 😅 then he said if I’m jacking off with guys to porn Then I realized he was the one that keeps coming to the door… so I said yeah smtn like that He goes, “shiiiiitttt my bitch sleeping saying she tired and she didn’t work today she holding out on me bro..” So I’m like do I need to pay you for this he’s like naa just help me out when I forget my keys…. I decided cool he’s not that bad so he came in and I took a shower…. Then this happened #queens #borough #nyc #gayporn __________________________________________ Trailer version here… full video uploaded to my JFF catalog. Click the link 🔗 in my bio to see all my other full videos‼️ __________________________________________ #lingerie #femboy #bbw #babe #bbl #cd #fatass #bigass #analporn #anal #firsttime #dl #downlow #trade #blackcock #bbc #bigcock #femme #femboy #Femboy #bbw #ass #domtop #bbc #trade #lingerie #bigbooty

𝗧𝗛𝗜🍑𝗨𝗘𝗗𝗟🇯🇲🇺🇸

52,891 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is a grooming report from 2005 what the bbc did and their findings and MPs said they knew nothing about it! In 2005 I was 13 years old the height of my exploitation I was been trafficked up and down the country my mum was screaming for help but no one cared …. In this interview my mum is under the name Vicky and my name is dawn at the time I was missing from home when my mum took part in this documentary my mum speaks at around 19 minutes into the documentary. Today is the first time I’ve ever heard it and it really has broke me hearing my mums voice brake not knowing what to do or where to turn to. It’s a long 25 minutes but it’s definitely proof that people knew full well and did nothing about it and just like one of the other survivors in this interview I was put into children’s homes for my own protection I was in and out of them all the time I would also climb out of bathroom windows not because I wanted to but because I had no choice. I was 11 when this first started and at the time of this documentary I was still a victim and not a survivor like my mums says on here by time I’m 16 I’m going to be dead either of drugs or by my abusers 💔💔 After everything me and my mums been through she really is my bestest friend and we are closer than ever I regret what I put her through but unfortunately it was all out of my control. Everyone knew the authorities the police the government and no one cared ! Thank you to Julia rooke and Anne cryer even though they couldn’t do much they tried to raise awareness around this issue 21 years ago….

Sarah

27,024 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Here is another recording of Manisha Swami on the day she was supposed to reprimand Adarsh Kumar Mishra because he was harassing female employees. But instead of doing that, she misused her position, misused the idea that she is a woman and went on a meaningless tirade about Gender sensitization. While listening to this, do remember this is a person who has cleared UPSC and pay attention to everything she says. I would like to know your opinion on how this is a gender sensitization workshop. She says "I can say hello to anybody but nobody can say hello to me". I don't know who she was referring to about being blocked but it was definitely not me. Because last reply from her to me is "Ok". There is a reason foreign policy is in shambles. It's because people like S Jaishankar, Manisha Swami, Suresh Reddy, B Vanlalvawna, Sanjiv Ranjan(IORA, Mauritius), Puneet Agrawal, Monika Aggarwal, Harish Baxla, Suraj Mohan, Gayatri Gosain, Adarsh Kumar Mishra, Yashashri Shukla(CVC) and Puneet Meena (DS[CPIO]&CVC) have been looting the country openly. I have not put even a single name above randomly. If anyone has seen my original complaint, you would have noticed that I had also written highly about good officers in the Ministry. But unfortunately there are very few of these. Otherwise all this would not have happened with me so openly without any restraints. After this case, it will be definitely clear whether India is an Independent nation or a country ruled by corrupt civil servants. I am attaching a copy of the FIR which I have tried to file but which was not accepted by police. In case audio does not play on twitter, here is the link I hope you are listening Narendra Modi PMO India Rahul Gandhi Subramanian Swamy Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 ಪವನ್ ಖೇರಾ Shashi Tharoor Priyanka Chaturvedi🇮🇳 Somnath Bharti सोमनाथ भारती Revant Himatsingka “Food Pharmer” खुरपेंच Anshul Saxena Abhi and Niyu Abhijit Iyer-Mitra Indira Jaising englishaugust Vir Das Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj Mahua Moitra Sagarika Ghose Sucheta Dalal Ramachandra Guha Sonam Wangchuk Sanket Upadhyay Saurav Das Sidhant Sibal ravish ndtv Dr Aniruddha Malpani, MD Sandeep Manudhane Akassh Ashok Gupta Mohak Mangal AajTak NDTV The Hindu IndiaToday Satish Acharya Yogendra Yadav Prakash Raj Zee News Al Jazeera World BBC News Hindi The Wire The Caravan newslaundry Govind Pratap Singh | GPS Manisha Pande I have started something purely out of sheer luck and chance which I hope is going to bring a good change in my country but I hope that world you are listening and that this man Dr. S. Jaishankar is a wolf in sheep's clothing and I hope you are going to definitely ban him United Nations United NationsHumanRights

Rohan

17,477 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why are these horrible date ideas & what mistakes did these guys make? 1️⃣ MOVIES: if you want to make a movie date work, your arm needs to be around her the entire time, you need to be whispering into her ear, talking with her, joking with her, and touching her (oh, and it probably shouldn’t be a first date… unless you guys really hit it off the first time you met before the date). You 100% do not want to do the thing where you go to the movies, ignore her for 2 hours, and stare at a screen. Doesn’t get more awkward than that. 2️⃣ TALKING ABOUT YOURSELF THE WHOLE DATE: (the problem wasn’t the Applebees, it was the conversation at the Applebees) you need to get the girl talking about HERSELF, then relate back to what she is saying, on anything you relate with. Leave little interesting baits about stuff about you, and if she is interested, she’ll ask, and then you can talk about it. If you are not interested in talking about HER and exploring HER, then that is not a date; instead it might be a good idea to start a YouTube channel, film yourself talking about yourself, upload it, and then anyone who wants to watch that can watch it there. But not a date idea. 3️⃣ IKEA: or any window shopping date — these can actually be awesome dates IF you are great at conversation and flirtation. If you are ass at that, however, a date like this is just torture, since there is nothing to distract from the ass conversation, and she is going to be saying to herself, “WHY are we just walking around looking at towels and stuff?” IKEA PT. 2: the 15-minute drive back in silence… 😑 Gotta keep that conversation rolling, my man. Convo during transition points (like the car ride) needs to be light and fluffy. Keep it fun, keep it flirty, don’t go too deep here; just keep her talking. If you want to do the OPPOSITE of all these guys: ✅ Take girls on dates that mind the Five Cs: cheap, convenient, conversation, covert, control. ✅ Get girls talking about THEMSELVES and dig to find stuff you relate to, then relate back on it. ✅ Leave little interesting baits about details about you, and then IF she takes the bait, share more. ✅ Only do window shopping dates if you have the conversation + flirtation skills to back that up. The fun’s gotta come from somewhere — if it’s not the date activity itself, then it better be YOU. If YOU are not fun, then at least the date should be (and window shopping, in and of itself, is not “fun” per se. Though a fun dude can make it fun). ✅ During transitions (walks, car rides, etc.), keep the conversation flowing. Light, playful, flirty, Not heavy topics during transitions; just not the right setting for that. P. S. Seeing as there is a large and easily triggered incel community on this site, I only share these tips because I care. If you don’t want to follow them, feel free to continue giving women boring dates then scratching your head when no second date 😉

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

37,092 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

If you want to understand the Joe FlipperHead, Olivia Lamb, Karen Read and Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney chaos; FlipperHead (a guy named Nick from Philly) got confirmation Aidan recorded Karen Read. Then the recordings leaked. Basically, Olivia works for Aidan as a paralegal, now, but Olivia used to be close to Karen in the past (and Olivia and FlipperHead used to be close, as well, on a personal level). FlipperHead, for his part, is loyal to Olivia and Karen but FlipperHead doesn't like Aidan (much like other people close to Karen). Aidan, in turn, seems to be using Olivia to discredit Flipperhead (potentially without Olivia's permission). VIDEO TRANSCRIPT: [Opening remarks on social media and focus] Grant: [Lindsey Gaetani's] been talking about on social media, but let's get to that second. What I wanna start with—let me find the tab—I wanna start with the developments related to Aidan Kearney and Karen Read, okay? So we're gonna jump right into that, and what I have here is the actual discussion. Now, if you go on my X, you will be able to see the entire transcript. I'm gonna try to scroll with you as the video plays. It's a lot, okay? And then we're gonna do part two as well. So eventually, we're gonna hit part two of the transcript. I'm gonna pause, and we're gonna go to the second video. Now, this discussion—the reason why I wanna go over this—is I was listening to it, and I was like, "Wait a minute, I speak this language that they're all talking. I understand sort of the subtext of all of this, but they weren't really talking on the surface." It's a conversation between somebody named Chris, who Aidan Kearney calls a "koala," somebody named Joe Flipperhead—who's actually named Nick from Philadelphia, who was apparently close to a woman named Olivia Lamb, who is gonna come up in this as well. Now, Olivia Lamb did a lot of social media posts about the Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial on her profile on Twitter under Olivia. Now, then Olivia started—in a public announcement—saying that she started working for Aidan Kearney. And what you're gonna hear in this conversation is there's also a woman named—who else? There's a woman who's Australian that Aidan also knows named Lily. She introduces herself in the beginning, and then she's kind of the moderator-mediator. And then there's another woman that pops up in the middle named Erika Walsh. She only speaks two or three times. She's one of Turtle Boy's moderators. She interjects at two random times: one, when someone starts talking about Meredith; and two, when Aidan starts saying how bad the content of the conversation in question—that was allegedly recorded and sent to Karen Read, between Aidan and Karen—is for Karen. And then there's a third unknown voice that pops up at the end, who sounds like—it's a female, she's American. I don't know her voice, but it sounds like she's very close to Joe Flipperhead, this guy Nick. And she uses this phrase about Nick "leaving Olivia's ass" in a way that makes me think maybe this girl is close to Nick, and like, she got close to him after Olivia and Nick separated. Now you might say to yourself, "Oh dear God, why—first of all, Grant, why do you know all this?" These people post a lot; I don't know. Tracking this thing is something I've been doing for a while. So it's not like I went into it because I wanted to know who the hell Joe Flipperhead was, or Olivia Lamb was. They entered into a world that I knew a lot about because they were trying to cover this case. And so inevitably, I just had them on my radar, and when things pop up like this, I just connect the dots. [Background on Olivia Lamb] In terms of Olivia though—so she, I don't know. There was this weird situation, I think, at the end of trial one for Karen Read. So somewhere in—I don't know—late 2024, summer 2024 or so. Weird situation where Olivia kind of then, for a few months, wasn't around as much, or she was, but not as much. And then she came back around for Aidan and said she was working on his team or something. Now, Olivia—I don't think Olivia Lamb's necessarily a bad person. I think whoever she is, and whatever she's doing, is very intelligent. But if you kind of look into that family, her mom is named Christina Lamb, and her mom does boutique consulting for law firms. I think her mom might be a lawyer, but she doesn't really—I think the way that she does consulting is more like tactically how lawyers should think about how a case is presented in the public, et cetera, stuff like that. And you have to tie this into this Elizabeth Dombrowski person out of New York that runs this Good Counsel Legal Services that proclaimed that Jen Altman and whoever else were paralegals for Aidan. You see what I'm saying? And what I think Olivia's role is—I think she just does PR. She does some paralegal work clearly, but I think she's mostly like a PR specialist. But I think why there's so much obfuscation—and I'm giving you all this background, because the conversation you're about to hear makes no sense if you don't know all this background. The context there, I think, is that—I think Olivia is a person. Like, I think she is real. But I think the reason why there's so many smoke and mirrors is that she's a conduit for implausible deniability. In the world of public relations—especially this kind of public relations—is incredibly important. So I think she's like a conduit for more entrenched public relations interests, which—okay, fine. I don't see that as per se evil. I'm a critical theorist. So I study propaganda. So like, if you are doing anything that emerged from Edward Bernays's systemic weaponization of his uncle Sigmund Freud's study of the mass psychology of the mind—if you do any of that—you're inevitably gonna catch my attention. Not because I necessarily per se think it's evil, but because that's my wheelhouse. Like, I reconstruct public relations and then I figure out what's driving that. Okay. So she—Olivia—got on my radar because of that, not necessarily because she's evil. Same, because I never really saw it. Now maybe some of the witnesses in the trial would think differently, but that's not my role here. I am like—I'm an objective observer. And um, Olivia was never really cruel. Like she just does PR. So I wouldn't necessarily say like everything she did was like right. But if you look at her style, it's not polemical. It's not—it's mostly analytical. Okay. So that's not an aphoristic or manipulative or evil person really. That's a PR specialist. And this guy, Nick—very similar, Joe Flipperhead. Okay. If you look at his posts—like, I wouldn't exactly say he's a cruel human being, you know, like he memes and stuff. Okay. He's kind of like Dave Cullinane a little bit, but he's just like a human. And you can hear it in this conversation. Like Joe is the one who's really holding Aidan accountable. Joe Flipperhead—whose name is Nick—he's from Philly. And um, I noticed 'cause I watched the stream of them one time—I don't know—he seems all right. I don't have anything against him or Olivia. In fact, I think they did a damn good job, at least Joe. Because what you'll also see here is there's another subtext. What this conversation is about is an allegation that Aidan Kearney sent a recorded conversation to Karen Read—a conversation with her—and then someone—nobody knows who—sent the recording to Karen's lawyers, David Yannetti and Alan Jackson. Now, what's weird about this is that there's also—and I don't like, whatever, I guess it is what it is—but the host, one of the hosts, Chris, this Australian guy—he might be a New Zealander, I don't know. But anyway, he starts saying directly to Aidan, "Listen Aidan, you went to lunch with Meredith—this Turtle Boy's former girlfriend—but her name is Meredith O'Neill (Meredith O). She's a person; she has an existence outside of Aidan Kearney and whether—a lot of people, I think, rightfully so, will take issue with some of the things Meredith has posted. But that's for her soul to deal with. She has to reckon with it, reflect on it, whatever the fuck, okay? That's separate from; she exists outside of the fact that she used to date Aidan Kearney." And I just wanna make that as a blanket point that like Aidan Kearney does not own someone's soul because they had some connection to him at any point in time. These people are independent people who have their own lives. So Meredith O'Neill is her name. And Meredith—like, clearly something happened between Aidan and Meredith because over the past few weeks—like, first of all, there's some more subtext to this, which is Aidan's paralegal team before Olivia Lamb came on was Courtney Healy and this woman named Tina Murray. Tina Murray —I didn't even know THE NAME until two weeks ago—but I had seen her before because she had silver hair when she was in court one time. I had no idea who it was, but she was sitting next to Courtney Healy. Now, way back when Aidan Kearney was incarcerated in late 2023, early 2024—apparently these two women, Courtney Healy and Tina Murray, were very close to Aidan Kearney. Someone had his logins, allegedly. They were helping like post for him while he was in jail, et cetera. Now, there's time back to that as well. Jen Altman is a key figure in all of this. And the reason why is that Jen Altman was the reason that Aidan Kearney and Karen Read got hooked up initially through Natalie Wiweke-Bershneider or whatever her name is. Jen Altman was also among this weird group of people. It was Tina Murray, Courtney Healy, Jen Altman, I think, and maybe just them three, who had access to Aidan in jail on a paralegal list. And at one point, Tim Bradl, Aidan's lawyer, wrote down that Jen Altman was a lawyer. She got so mad that she messaged Bradl, and then those messages got leaked. So there's all this discontent brewing within Aidan Kearney's kind of like organization, if you wanna call it. I'd call it more like a—yeah, it's like a hierarchy. And like he's at the—it's like a politician almost, but he's not a politician. You have like a top person at the top, and then you have all these staffers, and you have to manage the staffers. That's what he's dealing with. And he's gotta keep everybody like in line because like at one person breaks—especially a key—all right, two things. One, there's a reason you compartmentalize information, and you're not gonna be able to get in these type of operations because nobody needs to know everything. If you did that, then everyone would be a weak link. The problem is though, in order to compartmentalize in a bureaucracy or a schema like this, you have to have some people who actually know what's going on. Those people are liabilities. They're weak links. If you have someone who is too close and they know how you compartmentalized information, they'll see the full picture. They're the weak link. That's Courtney Healy, Tina Murray, Jen Altman, Meredith, Lindsey a little bit. These people are the weak links for Aidan because they see the full picture, whether they are aligned with him, don't like him, etc. etc. It's just they're the biggest weaknesses for him because they see the full picture. That's why he tries to either control them—in my opinion—or destroy them. But Aidan's in a real tough spot here because you can't run that playbook on Karen Read. Clearly, these people are incredibly loyal to her. Flipperhead, Olivia, etc. They may have been helping Aidan, but they're incredibly loyal to Karen. Now, what I've always suspected is that the whole point of charging Aidan Kearney was—one, he did bad things to the witnesses in the retrial, Lindsey Gaetani. He did bad things allegedly. Okay, the grand jury indicted him. But I think Brian Tully and the MSP unit that investigated Aidan—they were more interested in two different goals. Okay, they had parallel objectives beyond just the criminal proceeding. One: get information about who the target of the federal probe was after August of 2023. And it was Tully's unit and Matthew Farwell related to the Sandra Birchmore murder coverup. Number two: I think Tully wanted—and Kate Peter and Marty Keach wanted—Aidan Kearney and Michael Morrissey wanted Aidan Kearney to flip on Karen Read. It was a pressure tactic. It was always just a pressure tactic. That's what I fully believe. Now, I'm not saying he didn't do bad things. I just believe in the mind of the DA—these people were using pressure tactics to get Aidan Kearney in a tactical position where he would flip. Why do I think this? Well, a few things. One: in the fall of 2023, between like August and November, Aidan Kearney didn't need an intermediary with Karen Read. Natalie was out of the picture, although I'm suspect, because there's this new text from Natalie from August saying that like she was still loyal to Karen Read—although ostensibly they had a falling out in June of 2023 because Natalie called Karen late at night and she was upset about it. I always thought that was BS. Now I know why it was BS because there's also a March 24 message about like Joe Warren and Natalie wanting to go to court. I just have this suspicion that Natalie was never really like against Karen. What Natalie was doing was using Turtle Boy as leverage with Karen's permission—using it's called a limited hangout. Limited information about Turtle Boy's culpability for witness intimidation to the MSP so that the MSP would trust Natalie—so that Natalie could relay information back to Karen about the ongoing investigation of Karen and Aidan for conspiracy under 2747 and witness intimidation under 26813B. Now they did try to eventually indict Karen on that in March of 2024 at No True Bill, but they can do it again. They got more evidence—the state in May of 2024 about Aidan saying in Facebook messages that one Karen told him not to go to Lindsey Gaetani's apartment on December 23rd, 2023, and then some other stuff—basically where Aidan was implying that someone told him to run Jen McCabe's license plates. Who would that be? Karen Read. He didn't say it but he implied it to Jenna Rocco and Amy D'Angelis and whoever else was in that internal chat that got leaked. So I really believe that the reason why Aidan Kearney was such a liability to Karen Read—and why she was saying it out loud—is that Karen Read always saw Aidan Kearney as vulnerable to flip. Why? Because Brian Tully did his homework—whatever his motives were—and he found a few things. And I think that him and Kate Peter profiled Aidan Kearney. That's why Kate Peter had some role in this—because they thought Kate Peter should really like Aidan in a lot of ways because he used to be colleagues. Two: I think the state police thought she saw his psyche—Aidan's psyche—and could help them profile him. Three: I think Kate Peter is very hard into the world, and Tully and those other people in the unit could say like, "Yeah, we're worried about Birchmore; we got to do damage control here. Nothing's really wrong with the O'Keefe death investigation," and just—they're going to find out about Birchmore—and Kate would go along with it. That's my opinion. But Tully gets this video of Aidan that he had sent to Lindsey—and it's out there on the internet. I don't want to play the content; it's sad. But this is why I think this is what was in the prosecutor's mind when they were going—and the MSP's mind—when they were going after Kearney. Yes, he did bad things—especially to people that knew the DA and Tully like McCabe, Jen McCabe, etc. But also Aidan was an Achilles heel for Karen. Think about MSP, right? And the way we're analyzing Aidan's weaknesses via weak links in the compartmentalization chain. Okay, flip it around and think about MSP thinking about Karen. What's a weak link in her compartmentalization chain? Aidan Kearney. Now, in that regard, Aidan Kearney—if he flips on Karen Read—guarantees a conviction for Karen Read for the state, even if they can't get her on John's death. It was a backup plan. Second to that, I think though—it's a dynamic situation—and that something must have fucking happened recently. Okay, and I've long thought—and we'll read Lindsey's post on this later because she was talking about it on Twitter overnight, and I was reading it this morning, and it made me think about this—I've long suspected that Kate Peter made a deal with Aidan Kearney in the past like 6-8 months. And the deal was involving the Norfolk DA and the people prosecuting Kearney, and the goal was to get Kearney to flip. And I also think Kate wants Kearney in the Netflix documentary that she's working on with Gretchen and Sandpaper—which, they don't really understand. Like, bro, you think you're getting my footage and me if you're going to enable Kate Peter and try to portray her as the Charlotte of the internet? What planet are you on? No. No, the answer is no. But anyway, I really believe that this deal was made because why else—and I think Karen found out about it—because why else would Karen—[we're going to—the conversation is going to clarify all this]—why else would Karen on Friday authorize Joe Flipperhead to release information that confirms that Aidan recorded Karen. Now, why Karen is not going to do this if she didn't hear the fucking recording? She's not a moron. She's a tactical genius. I'm telling you—I don't necessarily agree with all the things she's done. I personally think she's responsible for John's death, but like—she's a fucking tactical genius. And you have to understand in some sense—like she wouldn't do this unless it's real. Like someone sent her that recording, and I don't believe Aidan Kearney sent it to intermediaries because if Meredith is the closest person to him—or was—in the world, and he's going to lunch with her and will only play it for her allegedly—okay, there's no way in hell that he would just send it to people. I believe—whether through a fake account or otherwise—Aidan Kearney sent that to Karen's lawyers. That's just my opinion. I think there's strong reason for him to do it. It's a message. Okay. As a result, I think Karen Read doing this had to sense that this was the moment—like this was the moment where the decision was going to be made about whether or not he cooperated. And now is Aidan's kind of like signal flare that I'm thinking—from Karen Read's perspective—Aidan sending that recording to Jackson and Yannetti is a signal flare that if she doesn't act now, he's making the choice to flip on her. Okay, well, what did she just do? She in essence just put him in the worst position possible because he had to be able to—him and Kate Peter—had to sell the narrative in public that—and this is why I was on Lindsey's profile earlier. Let me see if I can bring that up—him and Kate Peter had to sell the narrative in public that Karen was worse than Aidan Kearney. All right, so let's take a look at Lindsey Gaetani's post here. Let's read this first and then let's look at the post from Kate Peter. So Kate Peter post last night: "Karen Read has killed a man before and to my knowledge, Aidan Kearney has yet to do anything like that. Take that as you will. Regardless, they're both giant DBAGs, but you can decide who is worse. My vote is Karen Read." That's Kate Peter—one of the closest people in the world right now to Brian Tully, Michael Morrissey, and the decision makers who were initially prosecuting Kearney—telling you in plain sight what's going on. So let's read Lindsey's post: "Yes, we already know a deal was made a long time ago. How cute of Kate trying to win over the turtle riders after she pretended she was still trying to put him in jail the past several months. Does anyone of the turtle riders know who Christine Gagne is? I have no idea who that is. Does anyone know who that is? That's the woman Kate Peter blamed for wiretapping charges with TB and the person she blamed when I asked her where her deleted Google Drive went with the state's evidence. Why would Kate blame this woman for deleting evidence when this woman's name was never mentioned during the grand jury or in a single email or police report? Interesting." Well, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. So we know Kate Peter was providing evidence to the grand jury. We know that from the recently released court documents and discovery in the Kearney criminal case. Why was—why is Kate Peter blaming someone? Who is Christine Gagne, who—why is Kate blaming her when Kate was the one who was—there's evidence that Kate was directly providing this material to Tully, who was taking it to the grand jury. And by the way, I want people to understand: my anger here is not because Aidan Kearney was prosecuted. I think he should be held accountable. My anger here is because the people prosecuting him had ulterior motives. Lindsey Gaetani didn't have an ulterior motive. She was victimized. She was an unwitting pawn in this proxy war between Karen and the DOJ—Karen and the DOJ and Aidan on one side, and the Norfolk DA and the MSP unit on the other. But instead of trying to prosecute Aidan, it was all tactical. And nobody was told—that's the worst part. And that's why I'm so upset about all of this, because it was a disgrace. It was a disgrace to the process. If you're going to hold someone accountable, do it. You don't use it as leverage to get someone else. And if you're going to do that, be open with the people who are victimized. Otherwise, you are going to build resentment. Why would you ever want to be in a situation where you have to handle a victim? Because if they were made aware of what was actually going on, they would be upset. That is a very prime example—on its face example—that something is very wrong. Not because Aidan Kearney is absolved of liability or because I think he did nothing wrong. Absolutely not. No. Other way around. But because that kind of behavior—given impunity basically, because there's a larger fish—it's an abuse of prosecutorial discretion, not because the prosecution exists. In my opinion, a grand jury indicted him; he should be prosecuted. That's what happens when indictments get handed up. But because the aim of the prosecution was not to seek justice—it was to get—it was to pressure Kearney to flip on Karen Read. [Transition to the conversation] Now, to bring this all back—because we got to go—I want to look at this conversation here. I want to actually listen to this chat a minute. I'm going to explicate; I'm going to try to tell you what happens. "Hi, Bunny Towel. Hi, Christina. No haircut. But guess if you want to send donations—today's a good day for that. We got to get Towel to the end of the month. Towel's not going to be able to move very much for the next few days. So I could use some food if you want to send me some gift cards. I just need some help. All right. I'm a little towel. I got a lot going on. And anyway, so I'll—I'm sitting in my chair. That's as much as I can do right now. I can talk; my brain works. I can sit in my chair. I'm not doing anything else, but I should eat at some point. Anyway, so we're going to listen to this conversation because you have to think of all that background when you're analyzing. Why right now? Okay, why would Karen Read tactically right now burn Aidan Kearney? Aidan Kearney supporters are very loyal, but a lot of Aidan Kearney's base are becoming alienated because either they care more about Karen Read than Aidan Kearney or because Aidan Kearney's been on this weird tear recently where he like been attacking middle-aged women who are most of his fans. All right. Most of his fans are middle-aged women. And he goes after people's looks like whatever. So there's already this alienation happening. I believe the only reason Karen Read does this right now is because what it did—and what it's doing to Aidan Kearney—is it's decimating his support. Okay. Well, why are you decimating his support? Why are you forcing people to pick sides? Why would you do that right now? Either [he] cooperated or he's about to. All right. Now Karen Read—if she was—here's my read of this—if Karen Read was just going to cooperate, she wouldn't have done this this way. Okay. I'm sorry. It would have been completely different. I don't believe that she would have done it this way. I believe she would have done it a completely different way. And the reason why I believe that—we're going to read the text from Karen before we start listening to this. By the way, you can see I have the video here for you. What happened? By the way, just to give you a little more context. So this X Spaces that we're going to listen to—I have the full 37-minute X Space. This X Space, okay—it was before the text messages from Karen to Joe Flipperhead got released. So what you have to realize is these texts you're seeing on the screen got released because of this conversation. You're going to hear Joe Flipperhead say it.

Grant Smith Ellis

36,588 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten