Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

She devours your dick at home because she has been practicing on his cock everyday during lunch break. 😉💪🏿 #bbc #bull #practice #bigcock #blacked #qos #blowjob #handjob #throat #cheat #goodgirl #lunchbreak #nsfw #whitegirl

Bull Mike Low

22,060 subscribers

120,991 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #bbc #bull #practice #bigcock #blacked #qos #blowjob #handjob #throat #cheat #goodgirl #lunchbreak #nsfw #whitegirl

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The more you invest in a woman, the more likely she is to cheat on you because it's in a woman's nature not to value and respect a man who overplays his role in her life. But men will never hear that because they believe money can buy a woman's loyalty, but at the end of the day, simps are bound to eat dust, which is the joy of nature. And as a man, always keep in mind that the process of cheating is too long to be a mistake. Before a woman cheats on you; • she thought about the deed • texted the guy for a while • spoke ill about you • sent him her nudes • used your money for tfare to his place • during the sex, his dick slipped out, and she put it back in with her hands, calling him daddy • after everything, he came inside of her to mark his territory After being caught, it's in a woman's nature that they use their crocodile tears to get you where they want you to be emotionally because emotional blackmail is their weapon. Always remember; She's not sorry because of the act but because she was caught in the act. She placed a bet against your love, trust, manliness, and self-respect, hoping her tears would make up for it if she eventually gets caught. The more reason you should never forgive a cheating woman.

Sensitive content

The more you invest in a woman, the more likely she is to cheat on you because it's in a woman's nature not to value and respect a man who overplays his role in her life. But men will never hear that because they believe money can buy a woman's loyalty, but at the end of the day, simps are bound to eat dust, which is the joy of nature. And as a man, always keep in mind that the process of cheating is too long to be a mistake. Before a woman cheats on you; • she thought about the deed • texted the guy for a while • spoke ill about you • sent him her nudes • used your money for tfare to his place • during the sex, his dick slipped out, and she put it back in with her hands, calling him daddy • after everything, he came inside of her to mark his territory After being caught, it's in a woman's nature that they use their crocodile tears to get you where they want you to be emotionally because emotional blackmail is their weapon. Always remember; She's not sorry because of the act but because she was caught in the act. She placed a bet against your love, trust, manliness, and self-respect, hoping her tears would make up for it if she eventually gets caught. The more reason you should never forgive a cheating woman.

KING CHIDI

427,762 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

‼️Erika Kirk Says She Gets DEATH, Rape and Kidnapping THREATS Daily — Then Still LEAVES Her Kids to Travel Constantly🤔 At the Turning Point Educators Summit today, Erika Kirk claimed that when she took over as CEO, there was “zero percent learning curve” because she already knew everything about the organization. She said she knew every staff member by name, knew their families, and knew exactly what everyone was working on. She also repeatedly referred to Turning Point staff as “Huts” multiple times during her speech — a strange nickname that left many people confused about what she was even saying. On top of that, she mentioned receiving constant death, rape, and kidnapping threats, yet continues to travel constantly for events and speaking appearances instead of staying home with her children — the same children she claims need extra protection after already losing their father. Erika is trying to paint a picture of complete control, total knowledge, and a big happy “family” at Turning Point USA. But the reality looks very different. Chapter presidents have been resigning, internal pushback has been growing, and serious questions about her leadership and past remain completely unanswered. If she truly had everything under control and there really was “zero learning curve,” then why has the organization been so chaotic since Charlie’s death? Why has she allowed Turning Point to go in a 180 degree opposite direction of what Charlie built and contradicting all of his ideals and beliefs. RT this. More people need to see how this is being presented. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to silence my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to help... Donate Here: CC: Candace Owens

‼️Erika Kirk Says She Gets DEATH, Rape and Kidnapping THREATS Daily — Then Still LEAVES Her Kids to Travel Constantly🤔 At the Turning Point Educators Summit today, Erika Kirk claimed that when she took over as CEO, there was “zero percent learning curve” because she already knew everything about the organization. She said she knew every staff member by name, knew their families, and knew exactly what everyone was working on. She also repeatedly referred to Turning Point staff as “Huts” multiple times during her speech — a strange nickname that left many people confused about what she was even saying. On top of that, she mentioned receiving constant death, rape, and kidnapping threats, yet continues to travel constantly for events and speaking appearances instead of staying home with her children — the same children she claims need extra protection after already losing their father. Erika is trying to paint a picture of complete control, total knowledge, and a big happy “family” at Turning Point USA. But the reality looks very different. Chapter presidents have been resigning, internal pushback has been growing, and serious questions about her leadership and past remain completely unanswered. If she truly had everything under control and there really was “zero learning curve,” then why has the organization been so chaotic since Charlie’s death? Why has she allowed Turning Point to go in a 180 degree opposite direction of what Charlie built and contradicting all of his ideals and beliefs. RT this. More people need to see how this is being presented. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to silence my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to help... Donate Here: CC: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

32,096 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

A woman gets a call from a hospital saying her husband has been admitted. Confused, she tells them she doesn’t have a husband anymore. The staff insists; she’s listed as the emergency contact. It turns out to be her ex-husband. Reluctantly, she goes to the hospital, but refuses to see him at first. The staff keeps pushing until she finally agrees. When she walks into the room, he’s calm, kind… completely different from the man she divorced. A doctor pulls her aside and explains: he has amnesia and doesn’t remember the last two years; no fights, no separation, no divorce. In his mind, they’re still happily married. The doctor says it’s important not to force memories back and suggests she take him home, letting him recover naturally. This is one of those situations where emotion, ethics, and personal boundaries collide. On one hand, there’s compassion; someone vulnerable, confused, and depending on a familiar face. On the other, there’s history, pain, and a relationship that ended for a reason. Just because he forgot doesn’t mean she should have to. Would you step back into that role temporarily to help someone heal… or protect your peace and keep the past where it belongs?

A woman gets a call from a hospital saying her husband has been admitted. Confused, she tells them she doesn’t have a husband anymore. The staff insists; she’s listed as the emergency contact. It turns out to be her ex-husband. Reluctantly, she goes to the hospital, but refuses to see him at first. The staff keeps pushing until she finally agrees. When she walks into the room, he’s calm, kind… completely different from the man she divorced. A doctor pulls her aside and explains: he has amnesia and doesn’t remember the last two years; no fights, no separation, no divorce. In his mind, they’re still happily married. The doctor says it’s important not to force memories back and suggests she take him home, letting him recover naturally. This is one of those situations where emotion, ethics, and personal boundaries collide. On one hand, there’s compassion; someone vulnerable, confused, and depending on a familiar face. On the other, there’s history, pain, and a relationship that ended for a reason. Just because he forgot doesn’t mean she should have to. Would you step back into that role temporarily to help someone heal… or protect your peace and keep the past where it belongs?

Dr.L

4,500,752 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ugo, the idiot bought his cheating wife a car as a push gift whereas she was pushing another man's child. At the end of the day, he literally bought a push gift for another man's sperm, then went ahead to pay her tuition fees, built an app for her, praised her everyday on this app and worshipped the ground she walked on just to end up being cheated on by a guy who didn't do 1% of the things he did for her. While bro was thinking about her mental health while building an app for her, she was thinking about another man's cock. Another day to remind you that Nigerian men too mumu. As a man, note that there's no benefit in being a good man, especially to modern women. Women will rather cheat on a good guy with a bad guy because women know deep in within themselves that they don't deserve to be treated nice. Be a misogynist today or learn the hard way. Your choice!

Ugo, the idiot bought his cheating wife a car as a push gift whereas she was pushing another man's child. At the end of the day, he literally bought a push gift for another man's sperm, then went ahead to pay her tuition fees, built an app for her, praised her everyday on this app and worshipped the ground she walked on just to end up being cheated on by a guy who didn't do 1% of the things he did for her. While bro was thinking about her mental health while building an app for her, she was thinking about another man's cock. Another day to remind you that Nigerian men too mumu. As a man, note that there's no benefit in being a good man, especially to modern women. Women will rather cheat on a good guy with a bad guy because women know deep in within themselves that they don't deserve to be treated nice. Be a misogynist today or learn the hard way. Your choice!

KING CHIDI

468,129 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

LOVE IS BLIND EPISODES 7-9 REVIEW ! Everyone pissed me off lmaooo 💆🏾‍♂️ - At this point I’m rooting for NO ONE . The switch up is crazy on everybody. - Kenneth pissed me off with his random switch up with Brittany . The awkward silences and that cell phone 💆🏾‍♂️ . He did Brittany so wrong . Was literally waiting for her to get fed up with him so she can end it instead of him being a man about it . It was disgusting to watch . - Johnny is making things so complicated with Amy . A Birth control pill is not an ibuprofen & is so drastic just because your pull out game weaker than SWV . You don’t wanna use condoms , so like she said get a vasectomy since you’re the one scared . - Not really a fan of Laura , she’s annoying but the way Jeramey did her was wrong. The Sarah communication should’ve been CUT off & then to meet up , sleep with her , and lie about it , the same day/night you met her parents ? LOSER 🗣️ - AD is still “A Dummy” because why are you ignoring all of Clay’s early clear warnings of him not being ready. How many different ways does he have to say “I’m going to cheat on you” before you put on your sneakers and run . It’s in his genes 🧬 & all you worried about is how thick you look in your JEANS 👖 Worry about your leave out and leave him . You deserve better . - Chelsea is soooo needy . Needier than a homeless person . She baits Jimmy into every argument because she is insecure and it’s so annoying. And Carrie Underwood ?! LMFAO more like Carrie Underworld / Carrie Under Da Sea 😭 she only picked jimmy cause everybody wanted him and she wanted to boost her ego and her confidence has been on Low Power Battery Mode 🪫 ever since - Jessica , you really attracted to Hank Hill or is this your ego because you can’t believe he picked Chelsea over you ? #LoveIsBlindS6 #LoveIsBlind #LoveIsBlindNetflix #LoveIsBlindSeason6 Love is Blind Netflix

LOVE IS BLIND EPISODES 7-9 REVIEW ! Everyone pissed me off lmaooo 💆🏾‍♂️ - At this point I’m rooting for NO ONE . The switch up is crazy on everybody. - Kenneth pissed me off with his random switch up with Brittany . The awkward silences and that cell phone 💆🏾‍♂️ . He did Brittany so wrong . Was literally waiting for her to get fed up with him so she can end it instead of him being a man about it . It was disgusting to watch . - Johnny is making things so complicated with Amy . A Birth control pill is not an ibuprofen & is so drastic just because your pull out game weaker than SWV . You don’t wanna use condoms , so like she said get a vasectomy since you’re the one scared . - Not really a fan of Laura , she’s annoying but the way Jeramey did her was wrong. The Sarah communication should’ve been CUT off & then to meet up , sleep with her , and lie about it , the same day/night you met her parents ? LOSER 🗣️ - AD is still “A Dummy” because why are you ignoring all of Clay’s early clear warnings of him not being ready. How many different ways does he have to say “I’m going to cheat on you” before you put on your sneakers and run . It’s in his genes 🧬 & all you worried about is how thick you look in your JEANS 👖 Worry about your leave out and leave him . You deserve better . - Chelsea is soooo needy . Needier than a homeless person . She baits Jimmy into every argument because she is insecure and it’s so annoying. And Carrie Underwood ?! LMFAO more like Carrie Underworld / Carrie Under Da Sea 😭 she only picked jimmy cause everybody wanted him and she wanted to boost her ego and her confidence has been on Low Power Battery Mode 🪫 ever since - Jessica , you really attracted to Hank Hill or is this your ego because you can’t believe he picked Chelsea over you ? #LoveIsBlindS6 #LoveIsBlind #LoveIsBlindNetflix #LoveIsBlindSeason6 Love is Blind Netflix

3/12 🎈

1,080,579 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨NEW: 11-year-old boy was mauled to death by two Cane Corso dogs after his father allegedly ignored warnings not to let him stay in an apartment with the animals, which had previously mauled a woman and killed other pets Kache Grist, 11, was visiting his father in Edmonton, Canada, during spring break in April 2024 when he was attacked inside the home by two Cane Corso dogs The dogs, named Khaos and Kairo, had previously attacked a woman and killed other pets in the home The boy was staying at the house where his father lived with the dogs’ owner, Crystal MacDonald MacDonald said she had warned the father not to let the child stay alone around the animals, but the boy was still left in the home The father later found his son on the kitchen floor with the two dogs nearby An autopsy found the child died from a fatal bite wound to the neck, and the dogs were later euthanized MacDonald has been charged with criminal negligence causing death. She denies the charge and blames Wesley for ignoring her warnings

🚨NEW: 11-year-old boy was mauled to death by two Cane Corso dogs after his father allegedly ignored warnings not to let him stay in an apartment with the animals, which had previously mauled a woman and killed other pets Kache Grist, 11, was visiting his father in Edmonton, Canada, during spring break in April 2024 when he was attacked inside the home by two Cane Corso dogs The dogs, named Khaos and Kairo, had previously attacked a woman and killed other pets in the home The boy was staying at the house where his father lived with the dogs’ owner, Crystal MacDonald MacDonald said she had warned the father not to let the child stay alone around the animals, but the boy was still left in the home The father later found his son on the kitchen floor with the two dogs nearby An autopsy found the child died from a fatal bite wound to the neck, and the dogs were later euthanized MacDonald has been charged with criminal negligence causing death. She denies the charge and blames Wesley for ignoring her warnings

Unlimited L's

1,629,301 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A man in Uttar Pradesh's Meerut has been arrested for allegedly murdering his wife by slitting her throat with a paper cutter after she objected to his alleged extramarital affair, official said on Saturday. The incident took place in the Lisari Gate where the victim, identified as Kausar, was found dead in a pool of blood inside her home at around 8 am on Friday. Initially, the killing was suspected to have been carried out by an unidentified assailant using a sharp weapon. Police said the accused, Kausar's husband Saqib, attempted to pass off the murder as a case of theft. At the time of the incident, the couple's three young daughters were present in the house. Saqib allegedly instructed one of the children to tell police that robbers had entered the house and killed their mother. According to officials, Kausar had been opposing her husband's alleged illicit relationship with another woman. This, police said, led to frequent disputes between the couple and ultimately resulted in the murder. Saqib allegedly used a paper cutter to slit his wife's throat while she was asleep. After the crime, Saqib tried to mislead both the police and his family. He fabricated a story about an unknown attacker dressed in black and even staged grief to avoid suspicion. However, inconsistencies in his statements raised red flags during questioning. Police said Saqib repeatedly changed his version of events during interrogation. As officials gathered evidence and intensified questioning, he eventually confessed to the crime. Based on his disclosure, the murder weapon was recovered. Saqib works installing mobile towers during the day and drives a rickshaw at a mandi at night to support his family. Meerut SP City Vinayak Gopal Bhosale confirmed the arrest and detailed the sequence of events during a press briefing. Police also revealed that the accused had earlier tried to pressure his wife into ending her life and would allegedly provoke her frequently. The murder has left behind three young daughters without either parent, their mother dead and their father now in jail, raising concerns about their future care and upbringing.

A man in Uttar Pradesh's Meerut has been arrested for allegedly murdering his wife by slitting her throat with a paper cutter after she objected to his alleged extramarital affair, official said on Saturday. The incident took place in the Lisari Gate where the victim, identified as Kausar, was found dead in a pool of blood inside her home at around 8 am on Friday. Initially, the killing was suspected to have been carried out by an unidentified assailant using a sharp weapon. Police said the accused, Kausar's husband Saqib, attempted to pass off the murder as a case of theft. At the time of the incident, the couple's three young daughters were present in the house. Saqib allegedly instructed one of the children to tell police that robbers had entered the house and killed their mother. According to officials, Kausar had been opposing her husband's alleged illicit relationship with another woman. This, police said, led to frequent disputes between the couple and ultimately resulted in the murder. Saqib allegedly used a paper cutter to slit his wife's throat while she was asleep. After the crime, Saqib tried to mislead both the police and his family. He fabricated a story about an unknown attacker dressed in black and even staged grief to avoid suspicion. However, inconsistencies in his statements raised red flags during questioning. Police said Saqib repeatedly changed his version of events during interrogation. As officials gathered evidence and intensified questioning, he eventually confessed to the crime. Based on his disclosure, the murder weapon was recovered. Saqib works installing mobile towers during the day and drives a rickshaw at a mandi at night to support his family. Meerut SP City Vinayak Gopal Bhosale confirmed the arrest and detailed the sequence of events during a press briefing. Police also revealed that the accused had earlier tried to pressure his wife into ending her life and would allegedly provoke her frequently. The murder has left behind three young daughters without either parent, their mother dead and their father now in jail, raising concerns about their future care and upbringing.

Hate Detector 🔍

12,969 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The lady who recorded this should be arrested for harassing government servant A female passenger questioned a bus conductor of the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) for wearing a cap along with his uniform. The woman, who recorded the incident in a viral video, repeatedly asked him about wearing the cap. She said, “You are a government employee. Why are you wearing a cap with the uniform? Is it appropriate to wear it?” During the entire conversation, the conductor remained calm. His response was that he has been wearing a cap during duty for many years, and nobody had raised any objections to it before. “You can practice your religion at home or in the mosque. But as a government employee, you should not wear a cap during duty,” the woman the end of the video, the bus conductor removes his green cap. Was it a right thing to do? We also wear our religious marks like tilak or cross. But its not effecting the delivery of duty. What do you think?

The lady who recorded this should be arrested for harassing government servant A female passenger questioned a bus conductor of the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) for wearing a cap along with his uniform. The woman, who recorded the incident in a viral video, repeatedly asked him about wearing the cap. She said, “You are a government employee. Why are you wearing a cap with the uniform? Is it appropriate to wear it?” During the entire conversation, the conductor remained calm. His response was that he has been wearing a cap during duty for many years, and nobody had raised any objections to it before. “You can practice your religion at home or in the mosque. But as a government employee, you should not wear a cap during duty,” the woman the end of the video, the bus conductor removes his green cap. Was it a right thing to do? We also wear our religious marks like tilak or cross. But its not effecting the delivery of duty. What do you think?

Kamran

474,166 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Tamika Mallory has finally decided to address the controversy surrounding Jay-Z’s continued relationship with Target during the boycott. I’ve already shared my own thoughts on the situation, but I wanted to highlight her explanation because, in my opinion, it perfectly illustrates why I believe many activists and public figures apply different standards depending on who they’re talking about. Take a listen. Key Takeaways from Tamika Mallory: • She said she didn’t initially see the criticism because she has been busy organizing activism efforts, events, and work in Washington, D.C. According to her, her son eventually brought the online criticism to her attention after people began saying she wouldn’t speak on the issue because it involved Jay-Z. • She stated that no one can silence or muzzle her and that she has never had relationships requiring her to stay quiet in exchange for support. She said people at Roc Nation, including executives like Desiree Perez, know she speaks her mind and has never been afraid to disagree with them. • She explained that Jay-Z’s relationship with Target was already established long before the boycott began. According to her, the boycott was aimed at discouraging new partnerships with Target, not requiring existing partners to end longstanding business relationships. • She contrasted that with pastors and others who entered into new partnerships with Target after the boycott began, saying those were the types of deals she believed undermined the movement. My Thoughts: In my opinion, this explanation raises more questions than it answers. If the boycott made exceptions for longstanding business relationships, where were those guidelines communicated publicly? This is the first time I’ve heard that distinction being made. More importantly, why does that same grace not extend to everyday people? What about elderly individuals whose closest store is Target? Parents with young children who rely on the nearest Target for medicine, diapers, groceries, or other necessities? Many people were criticized simply for shopping there out of convenience or necessity. Why is Jay Z’s longstanding corporate relationship viewed as an acceptable exception, while ordinary people trying to care for their families were often judged more harshly? Toward the end of the discussion, Tamika said she wished wealthy people had voluntarily chosen not to continue doing business with Target during the boycott. But after spending much of the conversation explaining why his existing relationship made the situation different, that statement felt contradictory to me. What I find most interesting is that Tamika says she was so busy organizing and doing activism work that she didn’t initially see the criticism. Yet, when it comes to other people exercising their own freedom of speech, freedom of expression, or making decisions she disagrees with, she always seems to find the time to weigh in, criticize, and even chastise them. Now that the criticism is directed at someone she has a relationship with, we’re hearing explanation after explanation and exception after exception. In my opinion, that’s the hypocrisy. My issue isn’t whether people choose to boycott Target or not. Everyone’s circumstances are different, and people should make the decisions that are best for themselves and their families. My issue is the apparent double standard. Fair Use Notice: This video contains excerpts used for purposes of commentary, criticism, news reporting, and discussion. The clips are presented in accordance with the principles of fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. All rights to the original content remain with their respective owners. Source: TMI Podcast (Tamika Mallory & Mysonne) Referenced Timestamp: Approximately 25:00

Tamika Mallory has finally decided to address the controversy surrounding Jay-Z’s continued relationship with Target during the boycott. I’ve already shared my own thoughts on the situation, but I wanted to highlight her explanation because, in my opinion, it perfectly illustrates why I believe many activists and public figures apply different standards depending on who they’re talking about. Take a listen. Key Takeaways from Tamika Mallory: • She said she didn’t initially see the criticism because she has been busy organizing activism efforts, events, and work in Washington, D.C. According to her, her son eventually brought the online criticism to her attention after people began saying she wouldn’t speak on the issue because it involved Jay-Z. • She stated that no one can silence or muzzle her and that she has never had relationships requiring her to stay quiet in exchange for support. She said people at Roc Nation, including executives like Desiree Perez, know she speaks her mind and has never been afraid to disagree with them. • She explained that Jay-Z’s relationship with Target was already established long before the boycott began. According to her, the boycott was aimed at discouraging new partnerships with Target, not requiring existing partners to end longstanding business relationships. • She contrasted that with pastors and others who entered into new partnerships with Target after the boycott began, saying those were the types of deals she believed undermined the movement. My Thoughts: In my opinion, this explanation raises more questions than it answers. If the boycott made exceptions for longstanding business relationships, where were those guidelines communicated publicly? This is the first time I’ve heard that distinction being made. More importantly, why does that same grace not extend to everyday people? What about elderly individuals whose closest store is Target? Parents with young children who rely on the nearest Target for medicine, diapers, groceries, or other necessities? Many people were criticized simply for shopping there out of convenience or necessity. Why is Jay Z’s longstanding corporate relationship viewed as an acceptable exception, while ordinary people trying to care for their families were often judged more harshly? Toward the end of the discussion, Tamika said she wished wealthy people had voluntarily chosen not to continue doing business with Target during the boycott. But after spending much of the conversation explaining why his existing relationship made the situation different, that statement felt contradictory to me. What I find most interesting is that Tamika says she was so busy organizing and doing activism work that she didn’t initially see the criticism. Yet, when it comes to other people exercising their own freedom of speech, freedom of expression, or making decisions she disagrees with, she always seems to find the time to weigh in, criticize, and even chastise them. Now that the criticism is directed at someone she has a relationship with, we’re hearing explanation after explanation and exception after exception. In my opinion, that’s the hypocrisy. My issue isn’t whether people choose to boycott Target or not. Everyone’s circumstances are different, and people should make the decisions that are best for themselves and their families. My issue is the apparent double standard. Fair Use Notice: This video contains excerpts used for purposes of commentary, criticism, news reporting, and discussion. The clips are presented in accordance with the principles of fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. All rights to the original content remain with their respective owners. Source: TMI Podcast (Tamika Mallory & Mysonne) Referenced Timestamp: Approximately 25:00

ComeWithFacts

17,625 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

#PostOfficeScandal The former General Counsel at the Post Office 'Jane Macleod' who refuses to co-operate with the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is challenged by BBC reporters Katy Watson & @esylltcarr BBC challenges ex-Post Office lawyer in Australia ‼️ The Post Office’s most senior in-house lawyer when it fought the landmark case brought by Alan Bates and other sub-postmasters has been challenged by BBC News in Australia (BBCaustralia ), after she refused to appear before the public inquiry into the Horizon scandal. A BBC team questioned Jane MacLeod, who was the Post Office’s General Counsel between 2015 and 2019, while she was walking her dog outside her home in Sydney. She replied with “no comment” when asked why she wasn’t attending. She had been due to give evidence this week. “It’s unsurprising, but it speaks volumes,” says Jo Hamilton (Jo Hamilton ), one of the wrongly convicted former sub-postmasters. “If she was determined to help the inquiry, she’d be there,” she added. 'An important witness' Born in Australia, Jane MacLeod returned to live there in 2020. Last month Sir Wyn Williams, chair of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry (Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry ), revealed that while Ms MacLeod had submitted a witness statement, she had decided not to give oral evidence, despite being asked to do so. The inquiry heard that the reason, offered by Ms MacLeod’s lawyers, was that given the passage of time, she considered her written statement was the best evidence she could offer. Since then, Ms MacLeod has not responded to BBC requests for comment. Sir Wyn said that even before seeing her written evidence, he’d decided that Ms MacLeod was “an important witness” from whom he wished to hear in person. He added that despite the offer to have her travel and accommodation expenses covered, Ms MacLeod “has made it clear that she will not co-operate with the inquiry by providing oral evidence”, either in person or via video-link. However, Sir Wyn explained that his options to force her to attend were limited because she lived abroad. Under the Inquiries Act 2005, witnesses can be legally compelled to give evidence – but this only applies to UK nationals. In her written statement to the inquiry, Ms MacLeod says: “I am very aware that the decisions in which I was involved during my time at Post Office Limited regarding the group litigation and the investigation of Horizon's performance and robustness have had implications for many sub-postmasters and their families.” She adds: “I regret that this has happened and apologise to those so affected for the adverse outcomes they have suffered.” She is so sorry, that she cannot be bothered to attend and face the music🎶 #MrBatesVsThePostOffice #MrBates #MrBatesVsPostOffice #MrBatesPBS #PostOfficeInquiry #MacLeod #JaneMacleod #awol Nick Wallis @GouldsBlog Rosie Brocklehurst Kate Osborne Marion Fellows Kevan Jones Darren Jones MP Jonathan Reynolds Prem Sikka Dan Neidle

#PostOfficeScandal The former General Counsel at the Post Office 'Jane Macleod' who refuses to co-operate with the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is challenged by BBC reporters Katy Watson & @esylltcarr BBC challenges ex-Post Office lawyer in Australia ‼️ The Post Office’s most senior in-house lawyer when it fought the landmark case brought by Alan Bates and other sub-postmasters has been challenged by BBC News in Australia (BBCaustralia ), after she refused to appear before the public inquiry into the Horizon scandal. A BBC team questioned Jane MacLeod, who was the Post Office’s General Counsel between 2015 and 2019, while she was walking her dog outside her home in Sydney. She replied with “no comment” when asked why she wasn’t attending. She had been due to give evidence this week. “It’s unsurprising, but it speaks volumes,” says Jo Hamilton (Jo Hamilton ), one of the wrongly convicted former sub-postmasters. “If she was determined to help the inquiry, she’d be there,” she added. 'An important witness' Born in Australia, Jane MacLeod returned to live there in 2020. Last month Sir Wyn Williams, chair of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry (Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry ), revealed that while Ms MacLeod had submitted a witness statement, she had decided not to give oral evidence, despite being asked to do so. The inquiry heard that the reason, offered by Ms MacLeod’s lawyers, was that given the passage of time, she considered her written statement was the best evidence she could offer. Since then, Ms MacLeod has not responded to BBC requests for comment. Sir Wyn said that even before seeing her written evidence, he’d decided that Ms MacLeod was “an important witness” from whom he wished to hear in person. He added that despite the offer to have her travel and accommodation expenses covered, Ms MacLeod “has made it clear that she will not co-operate with the inquiry by providing oral evidence”, either in person or via video-link. However, Sir Wyn explained that his options to force her to attend were limited because she lived abroad. Under the Inquiries Act 2005, witnesses can be legally compelled to give evidence – but this only applies to UK nationals. In her written statement to the inquiry, Ms MacLeod says: “I am very aware that the decisions in which I was involved during my time at Post Office Limited regarding the group litigation and the investigation of Horizon's performance and robustness have had implications for many sub-postmasters and their families.” She adds: “I regret that this has happened and apologise to those so affected for the adverse outcomes they have suffered.” She is so sorry, that she cannot be bothered to attend and face the music🎶 #MrBatesVsThePostOffice #MrBates #MrBatesVsPostOffice #MrBatesPBS #PostOfficeInquiry #MacLeod #JaneMacleod #awol Nick Wallis @GouldsBlog Rosie Brocklehurst Kate Osborne Marion Fellows Kevan Jones Darren Jones MP Jonathan Reynolds Prem Sikka Dan Neidle

Christopher Head OBE

41,615 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Olympian Amber Glenn has spoken out about supporting the LGBTQ+ community under the Trump administration. Glenn, who identifies as pansexual, recently announced that she is taking a break from social media following backlash for speaking out against the Trump administration. At a press conference for the Winter Olympics on February 4, Glenn said: "It's been a hard time for the community overall under this administration. It isn't the first time that we've had to come together as a community and try and fight for our human rights." She continued: "And now, especially, it's not just affecting the queer community but many other communities. And I think that we are able to support each other in a way that we didn't have to before. And, because of that, it's made us a lot stronger." On using her platform to speak about LGBTQ+ rights, she said: "I know that a lot of people say you're just an athlete, like, stick to your job, shut up about politics... but politics affect us all. It is something that I will not just be quiet about, because it is something that affects us in our everyday lives." Glenn finished by saying: "As a community, we are strong and we support each other and brighter days are ahead of us"

Olympian Amber Glenn has spoken out about supporting the LGBTQ+ community under the Trump administration. Glenn, who identifies as pansexual, recently announced that she is taking a break from social media following backlash for speaking out against the Trump administration. At a press conference for the Winter Olympics on February 4, Glenn said: "It's been a hard time for the community overall under this administration. It isn't the first time that we've had to come together as a community and try and fight for our human rights." She continued: "And now, especially, it's not just affecting the queer community but many other communities. And I think that we are able to support each other in a way that we didn't have to before. And, because of that, it's made us a lot stronger." On using her platform to speak about LGBTQ+ rights, she said: "I know that a lot of people say you're just an athlete, like, stick to your job, shut up about politics... but politics affect us all. It is something that I will not just be quiet about, because it is something that affects us in our everyday lives." Glenn finished by saying: "As a community, we are strong and we support each other and brighter days are ahead of us"

PinkNews

36,669 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Kirsty Coventry was a brilliant Olympic swimmer. She is not an administrator. She does not have the capacity to do the job. She is the worst Sports Minister Zimbabwe has ever had. When we said it at the material time, people thought we were politicking. We were not. The evidence is right before you. For those who were in doubt, here is your answer. She is not capable of doing these jobs. It is like people who are brilliant footballers but will not necessarily make brilliant football administrators. The problem with various societies is that they assume because you were a brilliant swimmer, you are going to be a brilliant President of the International Olympic Committee. Just like a journalist, you can be a brilliant journalist, but it does not mean you are going to be a brilliant media owner. You can be a disastrous media owner and yet be a brilliant journalist because the two roles require completely different skill sets. Kirsty Coventry was good in the swimming pool. She is an incompetent manager. She is an incompetent administrator. This is self-evident from the disaster she left in Zimbabwe. She presided over the Sports Ministry for one and a half terms from 2018 to 2025, during which Zimbabwe could not play football inside Zimbabwe. Up to now, Zimbabwe’s home games are played in South Africa, sometimes in Rwanda. It is embarrassing, and it happened under her watch. She is simply incompetent. The failure, even at a small level like Zimbabwe, to ensure that stadiums in our country are functional, and to go to Cabinet and fight for those stadiums to be fixed, simply shows how incompetent she is. She was a brilliant swimmer, we cannot take that away from her, but she has been a disastrous manager. The tragedy is that many people are mesmerised by her past as a swimmer and then conflate that with the new roles she has taken up after her swimming career. Zimbabwe’s inability to host international football matches on home soil during her tenure was not a minor administrative detail. It was a national embarrassment that reflected weak leadership, poor coordination, and a failure to prioritise basic sporting infrastructure. Sporting excellence in the pool does not automatically translate into administrative competence in government or the international stage. The two require completely different skill sets, strategic planning, political negotiation, budgetary discipline, and institutional management. Being exceptional in one field does not guarantee effectiveness in another, and that distinction is precisely what many people refuse to make.

Kirsty Coventry was a brilliant Olympic swimmer. She is not an administrator. She does not have the capacity to do the job. She is the worst Sports Minister Zimbabwe has ever had. When we said it at the material time, people thought we were politicking. We were not. The evidence is right before you. For those who were in doubt, here is your answer. She is not capable of doing these jobs. It is like people who are brilliant footballers but will not necessarily make brilliant football administrators. The problem with various societies is that they assume because you were a brilliant swimmer, you are going to be a brilliant President of the International Olympic Committee. Just like a journalist, you can be a brilliant journalist, but it does not mean you are going to be a brilliant media owner. You can be a disastrous media owner and yet be a brilliant journalist because the two roles require completely different skill sets. Kirsty Coventry was good in the swimming pool. She is an incompetent manager. She is an incompetent administrator. This is self-evident from the disaster she left in Zimbabwe. She presided over the Sports Ministry for one and a half terms from 2018 to 2025, during which Zimbabwe could not play football inside Zimbabwe. Up to now, Zimbabwe’s home games are played in South Africa, sometimes in Rwanda. It is embarrassing, and it happened under her watch. She is simply incompetent. The failure, even at a small level like Zimbabwe, to ensure that stadiums in our country are functional, and to go to Cabinet and fight for those stadiums to be fixed, simply shows how incompetent she is. She was a brilliant swimmer, we cannot take that away from her, but she has been a disastrous manager. The tragedy is that many people are mesmerised by her past as a swimmer and then conflate that with the new roles she has taken up after her swimming career. Zimbabwe’s inability to host international football matches on home soil during her tenure was not a minor administrative detail. It was a national embarrassment that reflected weak leadership, poor coordination, and a failure to prioritise basic sporting infrastructure. Sporting excellence in the pool does not automatically translate into administrative competence in government or the international stage. The two require completely different skill sets, strategic planning, political negotiation, budgetary discipline, and institutional management. Being exceptional in one field does not guarantee effectiveness in another, and that distinction is precisely what many people refuse to make.

Hopewell Chin’ono

114,477 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Yesterday was a huge day 🎉 Our youngest baby boy Liam got discharged home from the cardiac acute care unit after 3 months since birth. Some of you know he has HLHS and needed Norwood surgery & been on a slow recovery path It’s been a roller coaster of emotions for my wife and I. At first it was fear and shock … which slowly turned into surrender and then courage and hope In fact my mom gave me a beautiful piece of perspective to knock me off my victim mentality. She said: “out of the 8 billion + people in this world, Liam chose you to be dad and our family as his. Because he knows we got his back. Because we will do our best to support and love him, now show him your best self” I needed it to hear that at one of my low points last month But more than anything it’s been INCREDIBLE to witness how many kind humans stepped up to help and support in this journey Our families, our friends, my co workers at Paddle who have all been super understanding and caring And of course the hospital staff who kept our spirits high every single day .. including surprising us with this sweet gesture ❤️ (watch till the end) Liam has touched so many lives already and has given me a whole new perspective on courage & living life to the fullest — no matter what PS: A friend of ours made him a cute graduation cap 🎓 so he could come home in style

Yesterday was a huge day 🎉 Our youngest baby boy Liam got discharged home from the cardiac acute care unit after 3 months since birth. Some of you know he has HLHS and needed Norwood surgery & been on a slow recovery path It’s been a roller coaster of emotions for my wife and I. At first it was fear and shock … which slowly turned into surrender and then courage and hope In fact my mom gave me a beautiful piece of perspective to knock me off my victim mentality. She said: “out of the 8 billion + people in this world, Liam chose you to be dad and our family as his. Because he knows we got his back. Because we will do our best to support and love him, now show him your best self” I needed it to hear that at one of my low points last month But more than anything it’s been INCREDIBLE to witness how many kind humans stepped up to help and support in this journey Our families, our friends, my co workers at Paddle who have all been super understanding and caring And of course the hospital staff who kept our spirits high every single day .. including surprising us with this sweet gesture ❤️ (watch till the end) Liam has touched so many lives already and has given me a whole new perspective on courage & living life to the fullest — no matter what PS: A friend of ours made him a cute graduation cap 🎓 so he could come home in style

KP

13,463 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A woman from New Town, Kolkata, has reportedly been terminated from her job after a video of her verbally abusing an app-based bike rider during a dispute over a cancelled booking went viral on social media. According to reports, the rider alleged that the woman had booked rides on two different apps simultaneously and later cancelled his booking after he had already travelled over 2 kilometres to pick her up. Upset over the cancellation, he confronted her while recording the interaction on his phone. The video captured the woman allegedly hurling abuses at the rider and as per reports she was allegedly threatening to file a rape case against him, despite there being no allegation of sexual assault in the dispute. The clip quickly spread online, drawing widespread criticism. As the video gained traction, the woman's employer reportedly terminated her services, stating that her conduct could negatively impact the company's reputation. Reports also suggest that crowds later gathered outside her residence, prompting police intervention after she sought help. The woman subsequently apologised for her behaviour, claiming she lost her temper because she was running late for work. While many continued to target her online, a growing section of social media has questioned the public vilification and her dismissal from work over an incident not related to her professional duties. The incident has sparked a wider debate on public behaviour, the treatment of gig workers, social media backlash, and the consequences of making serious legal threats during personal disputes. What are your views on this incident? Let us know in the comments. #formenindia

A woman from New Town, Kolkata, has reportedly been terminated from her job after a video of her verbally abusing an app-based bike rider during a dispute over a cancelled booking went viral on social media. According to reports, the rider alleged that the woman had booked rides on two different apps simultaneously and later cancelled his booking after he had already travelled over 2 kilometres to pick her up. Upset over the cancellation, he confronted her while recording the interaction on his phone. The video captured the woman allegedly hurling abuses at the rider and as per reports she was allegedly threatening to file a rape case against him, despite there being no allegation of sexual assault in the dispute. The clip quickly spread online, drawing widespread criticism. As the video gained traction, the woman's employer reportedly terminated her services, stating that her conduct could negatively impact the company's reputation. Reports also suggest that crowds later gathered outside her residence, prompting police intervention after she sought help. The woman subsequently apologised for her behaviour, claiming she lost her temper because she was running late for work. While many continued to target her online, a growing section of social media has questioned the public vilification and her dismissal from work over an incident not related to her professional duties. The incident has sparked a wider debate on public behaviour, the treatment of gig workers, social media backlash, and the consequences of making serious legal threats during personal disputes. What are your views on this incident? Let us know in the comments. #formenindia

ForMenIndia

21,034 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Kisumu Journalist’s Home Raided by Estranged Partner’s Family in Shocking Incident A recent dramatic incident that took place at a residential home in Kisumu has stirred widespread discussion among local residents and on social media, as conflicting narratives continue to emerge over the reported break-in and removal of property from the premises. The parties at the centre of the dispute include a well-known journalist based in Kisumu, Odongo Otieno, and his estranged partner, Sally Njoki, whose mother Pastor Maureen Lihanda is a prominent religious leader in the region. According to reports and CCTV footage circulating online, Pastor Maureen, accompanied by her daughter and a group of associates, allegedly forced their way into the journalist’s home and removed various household items, sparking widespread debate on social media. However, Pastor Maureen has been very vocal on social media since the story began circulating, insisting that the narrative being shared does not capture the full picture. She maintains that her son-in-law, the journalist, was present during the incident and has challenged various claims made against her family. In several posts, Pastor Maureen described the journalist as someone with a troubled past, alleging that he is “a betting addict who cannot even pay rent or buy food,” and accused him of sending her numerous messages and video calls. She further claimed that he is trying to “reap where he did not sow,” and dismissed several allegations made against her family as untrue. Odongo Otieno is a well-known journalist based in Kisumu who works for a prominent national media house. Beyond his media career, he has previously ventured into local politics, having contested for a position as a Member of County Assembly (MCA) in Nyalenda Ward, Kisumu. Authorities have since launched investigations into the incident, seeking to establish the full circumstances surrounding the break-in and removal of property.

Kisumu Journalist’s Home Raided by Estranged Partner’s Family in Shocking Incident A recent dramatic incident that took place at a residential home in Kisumu has stirred widespread discussion among local residents and on social media, as conflicting narratives continue to emerge over the reported break-in and removal of property from the premises. The parties at the centre of the dispute include a well-known journalist based in Kisumu, Odongo Otieno, and his estranged partner, Sally Njoki, whose mother Pastor Maureen Lihanda is a prominent religious leader in the region. According to reports and CCTV footage circulating online, Pastor Maureen, accompanied by her daughter and a group of associates, allegedly forced their way into the journalist’s home and removed various household items, sparking widespread debate on social media. However, Pastor Maureen has been very vocal on social media since the story began circulating, insisting that the narrative being shared does not capture the full picture. She maintains that her son-in-law, the journalist, was present during the incident and has challenged various claims made against her family. In several posts, Pastor Maureen described the journalist as someone with a troubled past, alleging that he is “a betting addict who cannot even pay rent or buy food,” and accused him of sending her numerous messages and video calls. She further claimed that he is trying to “reap where he did not sow,” and dismissed several allegations made against her family as untrue. Odongo Otieno is a well-known journalist based in Kisumu who works for a prominent national media house. Beyond his media career, he has previously ventured into local politics, having contested for a position as a Member of County Assembly (MCA) in Nyalenda Ward, Kisumu. Authorities have since launched investigations into the incident, seeking to establish the full circumstances surrounding the break-in and removal of property.

Cyprian, Is Nyakundi

199,015 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

HOW TO LOOK COOL & GET THE GIRL WHEN YOU APPROACH ❌ Home in on the girl you like and ignore her friend who’s also staring at you ✅ Open both girls at once, talk to both, win them both over ❌ Describe yourself as chasing after her (“courage to come up to you”) ✅ Use a chill opener instead (e.g., “Looks like you’re putting a lot of thought into that decision”) ❌ Ask her name unprompted (“What’s your name?”; you are seeking information from her) ✅ Offer your name first (“I’m Daniel”; you are offering value to her) ❌ Shake her hand like it’s a new business partnership ✅ Hold her hand a moment and give it a squeeze without shaking it ❌ Use her foreignness to compliment her looks in another language (“Muy bonita gracias”) ✅ Use her foreignness to ask what she’s doing here (creates an open loop) ❌ Compliment her looks a 3rd time while explaining yourself (“came up because you’re gorgeous”) ✅ Have her comply with you instead (“I love that bracelet. Let me have a look?” [beckon her]) ❌ Get her to show you the lingerie she bought then completely change the topic ✅ Get her to show you the lingerie she bought then flirt over it (“Oh… lingerie… what is THAT for??”) ❌ Ask her out 40 seconds in after on a non-high point not building any real attraction or connection ✅ Talk to her for at least 2 minutes, build attraction + connection, THEN ask her out on a HIGH point (i.e., she is really engaged, laughing hard, showing a lot of curiosity about you, etc.) Notes from the video: • During the initial moment, she smile genuinely and eyes him up and down (see her head to toe glance) while quickly finishing what she is doing. She shows initial openness to him. HOWEVER… • She gives the “Oh, gosh” eye shut and grimacing nod in response to his “chasing after you” opener. She acknowledges it’s ‘funny’ but still cringe. • She follows this by PICKING UP HER CUP (which she does not need to do) and holding it in front of herself defensively, creating a barrier between her and him. (If she was into the approach, she’d leave the cup there and face him without a barrier.) • After he blasts her with the fourth compliment, she backs away from him while laughing awkwardly and eye codes her friend (whom this guy’s still ignoring) in disbelief. • When he asks her out on “like a food date”, she takes two seconds to break eye contact to the side, still with her forced smile, briefly shakes her head “no”, then nods politely and says it “sounds good” and gives her number (while eye coding her friend again) just to get rid of him. • After he gets the number, he tells her “Next Friday?” and she doesn’t even need to think about what she has going on or check her schedule because she has no intention of actually meeting this guy, so she just says “Next Friday, perfect” to get this over with. Approach better & avoid these mistakes!

HOW TO LOOK COOL & GET THE GIRL WHEN YOU APPROACH ❌ Home in on the girl you like and ignore her friend who’s also staring at you ✅ Open both girls at once, talk to both, win them both over ❌ Describe yourself as chasing after her (“courage to come up to you”) ✅ Use a chill opener instead (e.g., “Looks like you’re putting a lot of thought into that decision”) ❌ Ask her name unprompted (“What’s your name?”; you are seeking information from her) ✅ Offer your name first (“I’m Daniel”; you are offering value to her) ❌ Shake her hand like it’s a new business partnership ✅ Hold her hand a moment and give it a squeeze without shaking it ❌ Use her foreignness to compliment her looks in another language (“Muy bonita gracias”) ✅ Use her foreignness to ask what she’s doing here (creates an open loop) ❌ Compliment her looks a 3rd time while explaining yourself (“came up because you’re gorgeous”) ✅ Have her comply with you instead (“I love that bracelet. Let me have a look?” [beckon her]) ❌ Get her to show you the lingerie she bought then completely change the topic ✅ Get her to show you the lingerie she bought then flirt over it (“Oh… lingerie… what is THAT for??”) ❌ Ask her out 40 seconds in after on a non-high point not building any real attraction or connection ✅ Talk to her for at least 2 minutes, build attraction + connection, THEN ask her out on a HIGH point (i.e., she is really engaged, laughing hard, showing a lot of curiosity about you, etc.) Notes from the video: • During the initial moment, she smile genuinely and eyes him up and down (see her head to toe glance) while quickly finishing what she is doing. She shows initial openness to him. HOWEVER… • She gives the “Oh, gosh” eye shut and grimacing nod in response to his “chasing after you” opener. She acknowledges it’s ‘funny’ but still cringe. • She follows this by PICKING UP HER CUP (which she does not need to do) and holding it in front of herself defensively, creating a barrier between her and him. (If she was into the approach, she’d leave the cup there and face him without a barrier.) • After he blasts her with the fourth compliment, she backs away from him while laughing awkwardly and eye codes her friend (whom this guy’s still ignoring) in disbelief. • When he asks her out on “like a food date”, she takes two seconds to break eye contact to the side, still with her forced smile, briefly shakes her head “no”, then nods politely and says it “sounds good” and gives her number (while eye coding her friend again) just to get rid of him. • After he gets the number, he tells her “Next Friday?” and she doesn’t even need to think about what she has going on or check her schedule because she has no intention of actually meeting this guy, so she just says “Next Friday, perfect” to get this over with. Approach better & avoid these mistakes!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

65,755 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Candace Owens Candace Owens is now deflecting because she doesn’t want to address her secret trust “The Battery Lane Trust” where she’s holding at least $12 million in assets. Call me whatever you want Candace. I’m not envious of your home life. Your husband has been publicly accused of sexually hitting on MEN, he showed up to an event with a black eye, he’s been accused of drinking and driving and you have 4 kids who you could be spending time with, but you choose to harass Erika Kirk. Nobody is jealous of Tucker either. He has been consumed by his demons and both of you losers have been publicly condemned by the President of the United States and are mocked daily for simping for US adversaries. Notice how Candace Owens refuses to publicly comment on Battery Lane Trust, which holds two of her multi-million dollar luxury properties that are located just 2.3 miles away from each other. Doesn’t anyone find it to be strange how she owns 2 multi-million dollar luxury homes 2.3 miles away from each other in the same city?? Is she living separately from her husband? I’m just asking Questions… For some reason, she’s still begging her audience for money for her security, even though both of her homes are gated. Candace, why do you have 2 properties worth $12 million less than 2.3 miles away from each other hidden in a trust while you beg your viewers for money? I have all of your property records, and much much more. Which one of these homes were you broadcasting from when you made the defamatory accusations against Mrs. Macron? Was it the home you paid $7.8 million for? Or was it the home that is worth $4.4 million?? Why do your viewers need to pay for your security? You are hiding money in the middle of a lawsuit. I’m calling Emmanuel Macron’s lawyers first thing Monday morning. Call me names all you want Candace. Brigitte Macron is going to collect her bag and I’m going to help her do it. Then I’m going to help Erika do it too. PS: I love your $26,000 Viking Oven. 😉

Candace Owens Candace Owens is now deflecting because she doesn’t want to address her secret trust “The Battery Lane Trust” where she’s holding at least $12 million in assets. Call me whatever you want Candace. I’m not envious of your home life. Your husband has been publicly accused of sexually hitting on MEN, he showed up to an event with a black eye, he’s been accused of drinking and driving and you have 4 kids who you could be spending time with, but you choose to harass Erika Kirk. Nobody is jealous of Tucker either. He has been consumed by his demons and both of you losers have been publicly condemned by the President of the United States and are mocked daily for simping for US adversaries. Notice how Candace Owens refuses to publicly comment on Battery Lane Trust, which holds two of her multi-million dollar luxury properties that are located just 2.3 miles away from each other. Doesn’t anyone find it to be strange how she owns 2 multi-million dollar luxury homes 2.3 miles away from each other in the same city?? Is she living separately from her husband? I’m just asking Questions… For some reason, she’s still begging her audience for money for her security, even though both of her homes are gated. Candace, why do you have 2 properties worth $12 million less than 2.3 miles away from each other hidden in a trust while you beg your viewers for money? I have all of your property records, and much much more. Which one of these homes were you broadcasting from when you made the defamatory accusations against Mrs. Macron? Was it the home you paid $7.8 million for? Or was it the home that is worth $4.4 million?? Why do your viewers need to pay for your security? You are hiding money in the middle of a lawsuit. I’m calling Emmanuel Macron’s lawyers first thing Monday morning. Call me names all you want Candace. Brigitte Macron is going to collect her bag and I’m going to help her do it. Then I’m going to help Erika do it too. PS: I love your $26,000 Viking Oven. 😉

Laura Loomer

1,475,555 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This went from honeymoon to nightmare REAL fast… 💍 She just got married. She’s on her honeymoon, drinks in hand, living what’s supposed to be the happiest moment of her life… Then her phone buzzes. A random DM: “Hey girly…” You already know that’s never good. Inside? A full breakdown, screenshots, details, receipts, claiming her brand new husband has been secretly involved with one of their friends for six months. Day ONE of the honeymoon. Most people would break down… wait… try to process it quietly. Not her. In less than five minutes, she flips the entire situation, turning his world upside down and exposing everything like it’s a public announcement. No warning. No hesitation. Just straight chaos. Now everyone’s watching, waiting to see what happens next. Because at that point… what do you even do? Do you confront him immediately and blow everything up? Or stay quiet, gather more proof, and plan your next move? And be honest… how would YOU react if you got that message on your honeymoon?

Dr.L

1,275,596 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten