Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

SHE SOLVED A 50-YEAR-OLD MATH PROBLEM IN UNDER A WEEK BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T THINK IT COUNTED AS REAL WORK lisa piccirillo, 2018, graduate student at UT Austin. she hears about the Conway knot at a conference and starts poking at it in the evenings. her own words: she wouldn't...

1,375,518 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

33 Yorum

Court profil fotoğrafı
Court1 ay önce

I don’t fully know anything about one lick of what I just read. But it is interesting. Thank you.

They Called Him Leif profil fotoğrafı
They Called Him Leif1 ay önce

Why are AI bros pathologically incapable of being honest? Piccirillo was an advanced low-dimensional topologist whose dissertation was literally titled Knot traces and the slice genus. Constructing knots with diffeomorphic traces was one of her specialties.

Beatrice profil fotoğrafı
Beatrice1 ay önce

The funniest part is that she thought she was just messing around with a side problem. A lot of major breakthroughs probably start that way, with someone being curious enough to follow a question everyone else had already accepted as impossible.

chrisvs profil fotoğrafı
chrisvs1 ay önce

I watched an entire lecture from Piccirillo (Phd?). Her discipline is developed to advanced levels. As an aside I wonder if she boulders or rock climbs. The muscles on her back are impressive.

Situation Dire profil fotoğrafı
Situation Dire1 ay önce

Cool. Your post only makes sense to you and… her I guess.

Big Play Bobby profil fotoğrafı
Big Play Bobby1 ay önce

Physicists and mathematicians from the mid 1900s don’t get enough credit. There has never been and will never be a group of people who progress the human race more than they did. These are the people that will be remembered in 2000 years.

Terry profil fotoğrafı
Terry1 ay önce

I like seeing stories such as this.

🚀 madscientistBTC profil fotoğrafı
🚀 madscientistBTC1 ay önce

This is one of the most legendary stories in modern math—proof that sometimes the biggest breakthroughs happen when you stop overthinking how "important" the work is, and just play 🧠✨

Oliver Traldi profil fotoğrafı
Oliver Traldi1 ay önce

@pangram is this slop?

Pepper_Flores Ontario profil fotoğrafı
Pepper_Flores Ontario1 ay önce

If no one knows the right answer how do we know it's the right answer?

Glockman 23 profil fotoğrafı
Glockman 231 ay önce

Made up solution to a made up problem.

Pēteris Krīgers profil fotoğrafı
Pēteris Krīgers1 ay önce

She did not solve the Conway knot by pushing harder along the same blocked path. She preserved the property that mattered while changing the representation: a different knot with the same 4D trace made an invisible distinction measurable. The truth did not change—the pathway by which it could become visible did. Deep problems may remain unsolved not because the answer is too distant, but because the chosen projection closes every useful route. Creativity is the reorganization of constraints until a previously inaccessible transition becomes possible.

Hil1Bil1Y profil fotoğrafı
Hil1Bil1Y1 ay önce

@grok explain this to me in normal person terms.

heyotetsuo profil fotoğrafı
heyotetsuo1 ay önce

To anyone struggling to understand her: Slow it down. Pause after each thing you don't know, google it, ask grok, etc. You don't have to understand in real time! It's only hard because it's new.

vie ⟢ profil fotoğrafı
vie ⟢1 ay önce

@pangram ai?

Dave Rogers 🦅 profil fotoğrafı
Dave Rogers 🦅1 ay önce

Just 10k years ago, we were only drawing pictures on cave walls.

Auren profil fotoğrafı
Auren1 ay önce

Solved a 50-year problem in a week because she treated it like homeowrk. Absolute legend

Jason Bravo profil fotoğrafı
Jason Bravo1 ay önce

Shes a joke. The clothing shes wearing is inappropriate at best and is mocking you. Disrespectful to say the least.

Ray Oh profil fotoğrafı
Ray Oh1 ay önce

I have no idea what this problem or the solution is about, after reading it carefully.

Marc Chagall profil fotoğrafı
Marc Chagall1 ay önce

"SHE SOLVED A 50-YEAR-OLD MATH PROBLEM IN UNDER A WEEK". Most likely AI aided.

Andrew profil fotoğrafı
Andrew1 ay önce

I wish I was smart

nlkeyl profil fotoğrafı
nlkeyl1 ay önce

imagine casually mentioning your “homework” and finding out you just solved a 50-year-old problem 😭

who_cares profil fotoğrafı
who_cares1 ay önce

Why did this show up on my timeline!!!!! Knot knot

phexus profil fotoğrafı
phexus1 ay önce

Her words might as well be chinese. Humans are amazing.

Sleazy profil fotoğrafı
Sleazy1 ay önce

I've been trying to break Conway's knot for a minute damn

HUMANbeingET profil fotoğrafı
HUMANbeingET1 ay önce

She’s wicked smaahrt

Andrew B profil fotoğrafı
Andrew B1 ay önce

Yeah..this bitch is at the chalk board so much she has special chalk board back muscles…freak bitch. lol

Ray profil fotoğrafı
Ray1 ay önce

And the world is no better for it

Dangerbug profil fotoğrafı
Dangerbug1 ay önce

She is a very good speaker keeps it interesting with cadence changes.

Shawn Quintin profil fotoğrafı
Shawn Quintin1 ay önce

I swear half of solving math problems is just making up your own rules.

True Oracle Tarot profil fotoğrafı
True Oracle Tarot1 ay önce

It's all theory and not proven. Even if they claim there is proof there's no way to prove the proof unless they demonstrate it indeed exist and as of now they cannot. Therefore only theory.

Arundel Elias 𓆃✞𓆃 profil fotoğrafı
Arundel Elias 𓆃✞𓆃1 ay önce

While she is closer. The knot is still incorrect for spacetime geometry within this universe. New observable conclusion yes. Solved no.

Tierduck profil fotoğrafı
Tierduck1 ay önce

Topology beyond the third dimension is called drugs addiction.

Benzer Videolar

Diane Lane was 18 years old, sitting across from Johnny Carson, and she handled the whole thing better than he did She was there to promote Rumble Fish, her second film for Francis Ford Coppola. Carson opened by asking why she had kissed the previous guest and not him. "He's just a very attractive man," she said. "Well, I suppose he is more the grandfatherly type," Carson answered, then turned it into a bit for the audience about too much sexual attraction going on between them. She let it pass and went straight to the work. On the title: "rumblefish is sort of a slang name for Siamese fighting fish, which is symbolic of a relationship that goes on in the film between Matt Dillon and Mickey Rourke." Then, almost in passing: "It's the second film I did for Coppola." And: "I'm doing a third one now as soon as I get done." She had just finished high school without attending the ceremony. Quintano School for Young Professionals. "Got my ring. Got it in the mail." The reason she was not there in person: "this is the 5-month anniversary date of the start of the film Streets of Fire." Five months on one production, at 18, with a Coppola film about to open and another one queued up behind it. She had been working since she was six. Carson asked what she did for her 18th birthday. "I did my laundry, actually." He waited for the punchline. There was not one. There was a reason. She explained that a surprise party had been thrown for her two years earlier, and that "it was a fiasco for me because I had to play hostess to a bunch of people I did not know and it was like a burden, you know?" So she made a decision about the next one: "I said, this one is going to be just another day in the life of, and I went out and I did my laundry." An 18-year-old actress, five months into a shoot, opting out of her own celebration because the last one made her responsible for entertaining strangers. Then Carson asked whether her parents were entertainers. He fumbled the question twice and had to rephrase it. Her answer: "My mother was a Playmate of the Month, October '57. I'm very proud of her for that." Carson asked if she realised it at the time. Lane: "Well, I was not even an idea at that point." He did the arithmetic out loud, 18 and '57, noted that her mother had been 19, and asked Lane directly whether she would do something like that. "No." He asked why not. "Well, because you have to reveal quite a bit more at this point. That's one good reason. There's many other good reasons why I would choose not to do that. I don't have to." And then the line that closes the whole exchange: "Mom wanted to get a lot of exposure and she did." Source: The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson

History Nerd

784,515 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A 21 YEAR OLD COLLEGE STUDENT IS CLOSING $12,000 A WEEK IN WEB DESIGN CONTRACTS FROM HER BEDROOM. SHE HAS NEVER WRITTEN A LINE OF HTML. She does not know how to set up a domain. She does not have a portfolio. Her entire agency is one Google Maps tab and a Claude subscription. She runs a move that the rest of the cold-calling internet hasn't figured out yet. Most agencies spend hours building pitch decks, hunting down leads, and begging for 15-minute discovery calls. They show up to meetings with promises. She shows up with the answer already built. Every morning at 9 AM, she opens Google Maps. She searches "nail salon" or "barbershop." She filters for businesses with a 4.7 rating or higher, hundreds of reviews, but no website listed. There are millions of them. Local businesses that are drowning in foot traffic but completely invisible online. She clicks on one. "Natural Nails & Lashes." She highlights every piece of information on their Google profile — the address, the operating hours, the owner's name, and five of the best customer reviews. She copies it all and drops it into Claude. She adds one line: "Write a prompt for an AI website builder using this data. Make it a professional, aesthetic, luxury website. Include the reviews." Claude spits out a master prompt. She copies it, opens Webild io, and pastes it in. She waits exactly two minutes. The AI builder generates a fully functional, multi-page website. It has a luxury aesthetic. It has the salon's actual address. It has a "Book Online" button. It has a testimonials section featuring real quotes from their actual customers. It looks like a $5,000 custom build from a boutique agency. It took her eight minutes and cost zero dollars. Then, she picks up the phone. She doesn't pitch. She doesn't ask for a meeting. *"Hey, I noticed you didn't have a website, so I built you one this morning. Are you near a computer? It takes 30 seconds to look at it."* The owner says sure. She shares her screen. The owner is staring at a beautiful, functional website with their own business name on it. They see their own customers' reviews. They see their own address. They don't have to imagine what the agency might build in six weeks. They are looking at the finished product right now. She says: *"I can transfer the domain to you and have this live by tomorrow morning. It's $2,000."* Done. She closes 5 to 6 of these a week. $10,000 to $12,000 in weekly revenue. The 6th deal last week came because the 5th owner showed the demo to his brother-in-law who owns a landscaping company. Real web developers are complaining on Reddit that the market is dead and clients won't pay for quality anymore. Agencies are spending thousands on ads to get a single lead. She is ignoring all of them. She figured out the one truth of the modern internet: the most expensive part of a service business isn't the service. It's the pitch. When you can build the finished product in 8 minutes for free, you don't need to pitch anymore. You just need to show it to them. The market is pricing web design like it still takes a team of four people six weeks to build. She is pricing it like it takes two minutes. The gap between those two realities is where she is making $12,000 a week. And the businesses she calls have no idea she's just the screen.

ZER

87,979 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨UPDATE: Trial hears Sir Jeffrey Donaldson 'regret' letter 'had nothing to do with the allegations' and that he was described as a 'very clever man.' 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. Kieran Vaughan KC, barrister for Jeffrey Donaldson, continued his cross-examination of Complainant A, one of the two alleged victims, on Friday. The trial had previously heard that Donaldson had written a letter to Complainant A in 2020 expressing “how much I truly regret all the hurt, pain and distressed I have caused”. Today, the barrister asked the woman why she had not handed the letter to police when she had first been interviewed. She told the court that she “wasn’t sure it was relevant at the time”. He said: “Are you suggesting it is relevant or not relevant to the allegations?” She said: “I think it is very relevant.” The barrister said the letter had “nothing to do with you and sexual assault” but instead related to other behaviour by Donaldson. The woman said while the letter did not mention sexual abuse it had “heavy connotations of guilt and shame and asking for forgiveness”. She added: “I believe that letter is a letter of apology for what he did to me over the years. Mr Vaughan also referred to an allegation made by the woman that Donaldson had touched her breasts on a number of occasions when she was of primary school age. He asked about her claim that she had been touched “skin on skin”. She said: “Mostly, one or two occasions when it was over the top of a bra, but mostly skin on skin.” The barrister drew attention to a meeting Complainant A had had with a police officer where she mentioned “touching over clothing”. She said: “If that is what she has written, that is what was said.” Mr Vaughan said: “On the face of it that is inconsistent with what you told the jury yesterday, about touching under clothes.” She said: “The facts are the facts, I am sticking to that.” The barrister said the complainant “would have known what he was doing to you was wrong”. She said: “Not necessarily, abuse is a very complicated thing.” The barrister referred to an incident where the woman had claimed Donaldson had “perched” over the top of her, using a light to look at her “private parts”. When challenged about her account, she said: “The light was focused on my genital area.” Mr Vaughan said: “I suggest that is not true.” The barrister added: “You were confused and you were not sure of what you had seen.” She said: “To this day I am still confused….I am honest about that.” After lunch, the woman said she had spoken in 2023 to a safeguarding figure within the Presbyterian Church in Ireland and also a police officer. Mr Vaughan asked why she had then waited until 2024 to lodge a formal complaint about the sexual abuse allegations. She said she was not, at that point, ready to make a formal complaint. She said: “It was a huge decision “I knew this would be an extremely public affair, involving media. It was a huge, huge decision.” Complainant A said she had been “extremely anxious” about reporting the allegations to police. She said: “I had doubt about doing this, I very nearly changed my mind.” The woman is due to be questioned by a barrister representing Eleanor Donaldson next week. Mr Donaldson is on trial at Newry Crown Court accused of rape and several counts of gross indecency and of indecent assault. The former DUP leader has pleaded not guilty to the 18 alleged offences. The charges span a time period between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. His wife, Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts after Judge Paul Ramsey ruled her unfit to stand trial on mental health grounds.

Cool FM News

28,525 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I dated a girl once and she was extremely beautiful. She worked for DNA models. She ate a terrible diet that horrified me. She thought she had to. By far the strangest thing about her was that she would listen to the same song for over 4 hours in a row, every day She'd come home exhausted, climb into bed and put on her huge expensive headphones and start playing her song. It was this song. It was no secret, I could always hear it through the headphones. In her music app she only had this song and she put it on a permanent loop. Some days she'd listen to it for 4 hours. Other days for more. Occasionally at the weekends if she really needed to recover in bed, she'd listen for 8 hours or more When I was around her, I'd listen too. Not because I wanted to, but you could always hear it a little from her headphones, in the background. At a certain point, it started to feel normal. At the start, I asked her why she did it and she said "I just love this song, why would I listen to anything else". I really liked her answer. So I didn't challenge it. She said she'd been doing it for years Sometimes I'd pick her up from shoots in the city and the moment she met me she'd ask if she could please put her headphones on and listen to music. Then she'd start. She wouldn't do it in public without me there, because she wanted to stay aware of her surroundings. But if I was there, she could put her headphones on straight away and just trust she was safe. She'd listen to her song and rest on my shoulder and close her eyes as we rode the subway home Throughout our relationship we didn't talk much, really. It was more of a physical thing. Not in a superficial way. Not just lust. I mean that we were both completely satisfied just resting on each other, without speaking. We liked physical contact, or a sense of shared physical beingness. But neither of us needed to talk like most people do and we really savored that about each other I actually really loved it when she put her headphones on and entered her cosy,safe space. It was like she was entering into a little coccoon. With time, I realized it was a kind of recovery protocol and a meditative trance. It anchored a state of rest for her that she desperately needed. She didn't have OCD or any other compulsions. It was just this one thing. This one particular song. It was like a little cave she entered to heal from the stress of the day and burdens of existence. I dated her for 2 years and she did it every single day, up until the end. When I kissed her goodbye on the final day, she had her big headphones hanging around her neck and the song was playing through them. It was the last thing I heard, on the last day I looked into her eyes

asparagoid

599,752 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,792 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce