Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

She turned down a White friend’s wedding because the guests might “unalive” her. Then she posted the text like it was bravery. That is not grief. That is a racial insult dressed up as self-care. Lynching is not sweeping America. A reception hall is not Jim Crow. Nolan Wells...

honeyybomb's profile picture

✌🏼Honey Bomb 🌻

21,760 subscribers

52,019 views • 26 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Do you guys see the degradation in real time? He twisted her words. She said she is a Christian, and he took that as a reason for her to show cleavage. That is not what she meant. She was only saying she does not wear a hijab because she is not a Muslim.
0:38

Do you guys see the degradation in real time? He twisted her words. She said she is a Christian, and he took that as a reason for her to show cleavage. That is not what she meant. She was only saying she does not wear a hijab because she is not a Muslim.

✥ Y O U S I F 𓂀 🇪🇬

25,440 views • 26 days ago

NEW: Black woman says she was 'kicked off a first-class flight' after a White man accused her of being racist Erica and her partner were kicked off an American Airlines flight from Chicago to Austin, Texas, after a three-hour delay She said she tried to adjust bags in the overhead compartment and the White man next to her yelled, "Do not touch my bag. Do not touch my stuff." 'He yelled at the people that worked on plane and told them that he felt threatened and that he felt uncomfortable because I did not want my bag to be right above him,' she said. 'He said that it was a "race thing," and that he felt threatened because he is White and I'm black and that I mentioned something racist towards him...' Erica and her partner were then escorted off the flight and told, "it's a race thing." 'The flight attendant said verbatim, "This is a race thing,"' she said. 'What’s the race problem? Clarify to me because I don’t understand.'
4:09

NEW: Black woman says she was 'kicked off a first-class flight' after a White man accused her of being racist Erica and her partner were kicked off an American Airlines flight from Chicago to Austin, Texas, after a three-hour delay She said she tried to adjust bags in the overhead compartment and the White man next to her yelled, "Do not touch my bag. Do not touch my stuff." 'He yelled at the people that worked on plane and told them that he felt threatened and that he felt uncomfortable because I did not want my bag to be right above him,' she said. 'He said that it was a "race thing," and that he felt threatened because he is White and I'm black and that I mentioned something racist towards him...' Erica and her partner were then escorted off the flight and told, "it's a race thing." 'The flight attendant said verbatim, "This is a race thing,"' she said. 'What’s the race problem? Clarify to me because I don’t understand.'

Unlimited L's

104,804 views • 1 year ago

HOLY MACRO: White guilt, a savior complex, and a heavy dose of wokeness are a hell of a combination. Women like her should be STUDIED. This compilation is a bit long, but it is worth watching. It is a perfect example of how a normal-looking liberal woman, the kind of person people would trust with their health, can be completely unhinged. She is a former nurse practitioner and a mother on disability. She uses her page to attack white people while celebrating everything black and everything related to transgenderism. She called Sydney Sweeney the “face of fascism” while telling white women they need to “fall in love” with paying black women for their work, but not to look like saviors, which is exactly the opposite of what she is doing herself. She encourages white women to buy from black-owned jewelry businesses and give the pieces to their black friends. What is alarming is that she is a mother. She said the mothers of Nolan Wells’s friends do not deserve peace for the rest of their lives. She preaches matriarchy and claims white women, including herself, do not even know what it means. She and others, she says, would have to learn it from black women. At the same time, she dedicated a take on motherhood to a black drag queen. She claimed people who oppose transgender ideology have no right to stand with Dolly Parton because she supported trans people. She also commented very negatively on a hung jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial before she knew the juror was black. After that, she did not have much to say. People with views this extreme should not be in healthcare. I am glad she is out. She should not be allowed back. I feel for her white children. She is going to teach them to hate themselves over the color of their skin. And I would like to know who the hell is married to her and puts up with this nonsense.
3:47

HOLY MACRO: White guilt, a savior complex, and a heavy dose of wokeness are a hell of a combination. Women like her should be STUDIED. This compilation is a bit long, but it is worth watching. It is a perfect example of how a normal-looking liberal woman, the kind of person people would trust with their health, can be completely unhinged. She is a former nurse practitioner and a mother on disability. She uses her page to attack white people while celebrating everything black and everything related to transgenderism. She called Sydney Sweeney the “face of fascism” while telling white women they need to “fall in love” with paying black women for their work, but not to look like saviors, which is exactly the opposite of what she is doing herself. She encourages white women to buy from black-owned jewelry businesses and give the pieces to their black friends. What is alarming is that she is a mother. She said the mothers of Nolan Wells’s friends do not deserve peace for the rest of their lives. She preaches matriarchy and claims white women, including herself, do not even know what it means. She and others, she says, would have to learn it from black women. At the same time, she dedicated a take on motherhood to a black drag queen. She claimed people who oppose transgender ideology have no right to stand with Dolly Parton because she supported trans people. She also commented very negatively on a hung jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial before she knew the juror was black. After that, she did not have much to say. People with views this extreme should not be in healthcare. I am glad she is out. She should not be allowed back. I feel for her white children. She is going to teach them to hate themselves over the color of their skin. And I would like to know who the hell is married to her and puts up with this nonsense.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

29,575 views • 2 days ago

It is almost boring how easy it is to expose the hypocrisy of woke celebrities like Billie Eilish. She lectured America about stolen land. Then she hosted her brother Finneas’s wedding on that same land, at a gated Montecito ranch where the valet parks the cars. If America is illegitimate, as she says, she should not officiate a celebrity wedding on it and go home. She should give the property back to the people she claimed were robbed. She will not. Neither will the guests who showed up after echoing the same stolen land narrative as her. The virtue signaling was an act meant to insult people she disagrees with politically. She preaches open borders, condemns American sovereignty, then celebrates behind fences on land she tells other people to return. It is unbelievable that she thinks this will pass. It shows she is both ignorant and a narcissist. Lambast her. First clip is her public “stolen land” line. Second clip is my words, based on the wedding she hosted, not hers.
0:30

It is almost boring how easy it is to expose the hypocrisy of woke celebrities like Billie Eilish. She lectured America about stolen land. Then she hosted her brother Finneas’s wedding on that same land, at a gated Montecito ranch where the valet parks the cars. If America is illegitimate, as she says, she should not officiate a celebrity wedding on it and go home. She should give the property back to the people she claimed were robbed. She will not. Neither will the guests who showed up after echoing the same stolen land narrative as her. The virtue signaling was an act meant to insult people she disagrees with politically. She preaches open borders, condemns American sovereignty, then celebrates behind fences on land she tells other people to return. It is unbelievable that she thinks this will pass. It shows she is both ignorant and a narcissist. Lambast her. First clip is her public “stolen land” line. Second clip is my words, based on the wedding she hosted, not hers.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

11,236 views • 29 days ago

Season 2 Episodes #56 & #57 “I DO NOT CONSENT” Karen is not happy that people are filming her at meetings. She is upset that people are filming her at all. We wonder where people got the idea to do such a thing. Karen writes an email stating that her privacy is being violated because she was filmed. In the next sentence, she states, “I fully intend to videotape the board meeting scheduled for tomorrow.” Then she states that Florida is a two-party state, and she DOES NOT CONSENT to being filmed. Clearly, she is very confused and does not understand the statute; nothing new, she makes it up as she goes along, thinking everyone is an idiot. Here’s a thought: if you don’t want to be filmed, STAY HOME AND WATCH IT ON ZOOM! Practice what you preach!!! #Karen #HOAnightmare #TheMotherofallKarens #TheWeasel #repost
2:13

Season 2 Episodes #56 & #57 “I DO NOT CONSENT” Karen is not happy that people are filming her at meetings. She is upset that people are filming her at all. We wonder where people got the idea to do such a thing. Karen writes an email stating that her privacy is being violated because she was filmed. In the next sentence, she states, “I fully intend to videotape the board meeting scheduled for tomorrow.” Then she states that Florida is a two-party state, and she DOES NOT CONSENT to being filmed. Clearly, she is very confused and does not understand the statute; nothing new, she makes it up as she goes along, thinking everyone is an idiot. Here’s a thought: if you don’t want to be filmed, STAY HOME AND WATCH IT ON ZOOM! Practice what you preach!!! #Karen #HOAnightmare #TheMotherofallKarens #TheWeasel #repost

Karen Lives Matter

15,633 views • 6 months ago

Meghan Markle: Writing About ‘Princess Kate’ in 2014, ‘I Didn’t Know the Royal Family’ in 2021 Meghan sat with Oprah and said she went into royal life naively. The family was not something they followed at home. She did no research. She never looked her husband up. Everything she needed to know, Harry was already telling her. Then she added the line that gives the game away: thank God she hadn’t researched, or she would have been in her head about it. Hold that against how ordinary people behave. It is not normal adult behaviour. Most people marrying into any close family do some homework. They ask questions. They learn the names, the dynamics, the rules of the house. They do it out of respect, self-preservation and basic courtesy. Marrying into the British monarchy is that instinct multiplied. You are not joining a nice family in Surrey. You are walking into an institution with protocol, history, press machinery and a public that already has opinions before you open your mouth. Saying you felt no need to look any of that up, and that Harry telling you “everything we thought I needed to know” was enough, is not charming innocence. She made not bothering to look sound like a personality trait. It puts the burden on them to brief you, protect you, and translate a 1,200-year-old system around your feelings. Ordinary people do not get that luxury and do not expect it. Put her words next to the record and it gets sharper than naivety. She did not grow up in a vacuum. In 2014, on her own blog, she was writing about William and Kate’s wedding, “Princess Kate,” pomp, and grown women clinging to the fantasy. That is not “it wasn’t part of conversation.” That is a woman who had already formed a take. Then she sat with Oprah and gave us the other side of the story: blank slate, never researched, never looked him up, thank God she hadn’t or she would have been “in her head.” That’s the bit that should stop people. “I didn’t know” is the setup for “so none of this is on me.” If she walked in wide-eyed, every clash becomes proof the institution failed her, instead of a clash between her expectations and a job she declined to study. Naivety becomes a moral alibi. Normal people in that position would have done the opposite. They would have over-prepared. They would have been slightly embarrassed not to know the anthem, the curtsy, the difference between the family and the institution. She framed not knowing as virtue. That is not how a respectful newcomer talks. That is how someone talks when the story they need is: I was unspoiled, they were the problem. This is her being uniquely evil. It is a habit. Rewrite the small facts until they serve the larger narrative of injured innocence. If the blogs she wrote get rewritten, the Google search gets rewritten, and “I didn’t know” becomes the convenient version, why would the rest of the interview be any different?
1:03

Meghan Markle: Writing About ‘Princess Kate’ in 2014, ‘I Didn’t Know the Royal Family’ in 2021 Meghan sat with Oprah and said she went into royal life naively. The family was not something they followed at home. She did no research. She never looked her husband up. Everything she needed to know, Harry was already telling her. Then she added the line that gives the game away: thank God she hadn’t researched, or she would have been in her head about it. Hold that against how ordinary people behave. It is not normal adult behaviour. Most people marrying into any close family do some homework. They ask questions. They learn the names, the dynamics, the rules of the house. They do it out of respect, self-preservation and basic courtesy. Marrying into the British monarchy is that instinct multiplied. You are not joining a nice family in Surrey. You are walking into an institution with protocol, history, press machinery and a public that already has opinions before you open your mouth. Saying you felt no need to look any of that up, and that Harry telling you “everything we thought I needed to know” was enough, is not charming innocence. She made not bothering to look sound like a personality trait. It puts the burden on them to brief you, protect you, and translate a 1,200-year-old system around your feelings. Ordinary people do not get that luxury and do not expect it. Put her words next to the record and it gets sharper than naivety. She did not grow up in a vacuum. In 2014, on her own blog, she was writing about William and Kate’s wedding, “Princess Kate,” pomp, and grown women clinging to the fantasy. That is not “it wasn’t part of conversation.” That is a woman who had already formed a take. Then she sat with Oprah and gave us the other side of the story: blank slate, never researched, never looked him up, thank God she hadn’t or she would have been “in her head.” That’s the bit that should stop people. “I didn’t know” is the setup for “so none of this is on me.” If she walked in wide-eyed, every clash becomes proof the institution failed her, instead of a clash between her expectations and a job she declined to study. Naivety becomes a moral alibi. Normal people in that position would have done the opposite. They would have over-prepared. They would have been slightly embarrassed not to know the anthem, the curtsy, the difference between the family and the institution. She framed not knowing as virtue. That is not how a respectful newcomer talks. That is how someone talks when the story they need is: I was unspoiled, they were the problem. This is her being uniquely evil. It is a habit. Rewrite the small facts until they serve the larger narrative of injured innocence. If the blogs she wrote get rewritten, the Google search gets rewritten, and “I didn’t know” becomes the convenient version, why would the rest of the interview be any different?

Queen Esther

89,089 views • 1 month ago

Ok, so ... a black rapper named Erica Banks is at an airport in Colorado. She is running....cause she is late for her flight. And the door closes. She said she was racially profiled and that they closed the door on her and her friend....because.... yes .... you guessed it . .... because they are black. 🙄 Not sure what airport they are at in Colorado. But if it's Denver .. it is the most liberal airport i have ever been in. She wasn't being profiled .. she should have been on time. Bottom line is ... she expected special treatment because she is a rapper.
2:15

Ok, so ... a black rapper named Erica Banks is at an airport in Colorado. She is running....cause she is late for her flight. And the door closes. She said she was racially profiled and that they closed the door on her and her friend....because.... yes .... you guessed it . .... because they are black. 🙄 Not sure what airport they are at in Colorado. But if it's Denver .. it is the most liberal airport i have ever been in. She wasn't being profiled .. she should have been on time. Bottom line is ... she expected special treatment because she is a rapper.

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

114,568 views • 5 months ago

A young Black woman was asked a simple question: What can white Americans do today that Black Americans cannot? She could not answer it. Instead, she claimed Black people are constantly being judged. But how does she know what strangers are thinking? When someone does not wave, speak, or smile, it does not automatically mean racism. People have their own problems and may not even notice you. The victim mindset puts every interaction in question because of a flawed worldview. Black and white Americans have the same legal rights. This is 2026, not Jim Crow. But Democrats need Black Americans to believe nothing has changed because the victimhood narrative is how they maintain control.
2:08

A young Black woman was asked a simple question: What can white Americans do today that Black Americans cannot? She could not answer it. Instead, she claimed Black people are constantly being judged. But how does she know what strangers are thinking? When someone does not wave, speak, or smile, it does not automatically mean racism. People have their own problems and may not even notice you. The victim mindset puts every interaction in question because of a flawed worldview. Black and white Americans have the same legal rights. This is 2026, not Jim Crow. But Democrats need Black Americans to believe nothing has changed because the victimhood narrative is how they maintain control.

DeVory Darkins

129,392 views • 2 months ago

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.
2:06

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

LOLO

3,184,726 views • 25 days ago

This Black conservative woman is dropping some real talk from her car. She says no white conservative has ever called her a racial slur, a monkey, told her they want her to hang, or said she belongs in a field. But Black liberals, White liberals, and the tolerant left have said all that stuff to her over and over. She points out that conservatives do not care about skin color. They care about the truth. The whole idea that the Conservative Party is racist is nonsense. “We are just not stupid.” Powerful video.
0:58

This Black conservative woman is dropping some real talk from her car. She says no white conservative has ever called her a racial slur, a monkey, told her they want her to hang, or said she belongs in a field. But Black liberals, White liberals, and the tolerant left have said all that stuff to her over and over. She points out that conservatives do not care about skin color. They care about the truth. The whole idea that the Conservative Party is racist is nonsense. “We are just not stupid.” Powerful video.

Mor Edge Insight

167,038 views • 3 months ago

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.
3:03

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 views • 4 months ago

This Ghanaian lady, Nairy, moved from Ghana to Nigeria because of his Nigerian boyfriend. (worst decision she said) She is a digital marketer, so she has been moving back and forth over the last 4 years. She finally returned to Ghana with nothing because everything she worked for, the person she left it with had given it out to his girlfriend and told her it was stolen. (At this point idk if she was referring to her Nigerian boyfriend or not.) Now she is depressed and wants to do that thing we are not supposed to talk about. I have questions, but I will ask later. Hmm, people are going to a lot. Always check on your friends.
3:15

This Ghanaian lady, Nairy, moved from Ghana to Nigeria because of his Nigerian boyfriend. (worst decision she said) She is a digital marketer, so she has been moving back and forth over the last 4 years. She finally returned to Ghana with nothing because everything she worked for, the person she left it with had given it out to his girlfriend and told her it was stolen. (At this point idk if she was referring to her Nigerian boyfriend or not.) Now she is depressed and wants to do that thing we are not supposed to talk about. I have questions, but I will ask later. Hmm, people are going to a lot. Always check on your friends.

WithAlvin 🇬🇭

28,375 views • 4 months ago

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.
0:24

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 views • 8 months ago

Dear patriot friends ⚜️, Do not fall into the trap, Thaïs d'Escufon is not a patriot. She is a grifter, a moron and a liar. She said that « Black men are a danger », she said « Black men are dangerous ». Remember that Charlie Kirk was not racist, it was both a strategy and a deep conviction. Have a good day ! 🙏🏻🇨🇵
2:47

Dear patriot friends ⚜️, Do not fall into the trap, Thaïs d'Escufon is not a patriot. She is a grifter, a moron and a liar. She said that « Black men are a danger », she said « Black men are dangerous ». Remember that Charlie Kirk was not racist, it was both a strategy and a deep conviction. Have a good day ! 🙏🏻🇨🇵

Isabelle DECRION BALDO ⚜️

47,833 views • 3 months ago

I do not understand this fantasy of making someone constantly happy. You are a grown woman. Your emotional state is your responsibility. If you need a handler to regulate your happiness, then that is your weakness, not his failure. Every time I hear the word “provider” thrown at a man, I ask the obvious question: Provide what exactly, and how much is enough? A roof? Money? Attention? Validation? Endless reassurance? At what point does it stop—or does it ever? This woman sits there waiting for a man to manufacture her happiness like he is a factory and she is entitled to the product. As if she is incapable of building a life she enjoys without outsourcing her emotional stability. She wants joy delivered on a silver platter and calls it love. That is not love. That is dependency dressed up as romance. If you cannot create your own happiness, you are not looking for a partner. You are looking for a caretaker.
0:32

I do not understand this fantasy of making someone constantly happy. You are a grown woman. Your emotional state is your responsibility. If you need a handler to regulate your happiness, then that is your weakness, not his failure. Every time I hear the word “provider” thrown at a man, I ask the obvious question: Provide what exactly, and how much is enough? A roof? Money? Attention? Validation? Endless reassurance? At what point does it stop—or does it ever? This woman sits there waiting for a man to manufacture her happiness like he is a factory and she is entitled to the product. As if she is incapable of building a life she enjoys without outsourcing her emotional stability. She wants joy delivered on a silver platter and calls it love. That is not love. That is dependency dressed up as romance. If you cannot create your own happiness, you are not looking for a partner. You are looking for a caretaker.

Larry Conger 🇺🇸

31,096 views • 6 months ago

This tiny New York City apartment, 80 x 150, goes for $650 a month! 🤯 She has no oven and her bed is up a ladder and there is about two to three feet of space from the bed to the ceiling. Her bathroom is actually outside the apartment down the hall. She has to walk past her neighbors to get to it. She goes up on the roof outside to get some space, do some work and maybe a little yoga. But get this, she has a dog! She said she sometimes leaves the dog in the apartment or she takes him to daycare. 🤔 I could not live like that. I could not sleep like that and I could not shower like that. And, I could not have a dog in such a small space. Many, many people said that she should not have a dog and should not be allowed to have a dog in such a tiny apartment. Do you think it is cruel to have the dog with her? Or , do you think that if the dog is getting love and fed, cares for and taken out, that’s her business? Have you ever seen a smaller apartment than this? Could you ever live like this?
5:28

This tiny New York City apartment, 80 x 150, goes for $650 a month! 🤯 She has no oven and her bed is up a ladder and there is about two to three feet of space from the bed to the ceiling. Her bathroom is actually outside the apartment down the hall. She has to walk past her neighbors to get to it. She goes up on the roof outside to get some space, do some work and maybe a little yoga. But get this, she has a dog! She said she sometimes leaves the dog in the apartment or she takes him to daycare. 🤔 I could not live like that. I could not sleep like that and I could not shower like that. And, I could not have a dog in such a small space. Many, many people said that she should not have a dog and should not be allowed to have a dog in such a tiny apartment. Do you think it is cruel to have the dog with her? Or , do you think that if the dog is getting love and fed, cares for and taken out, that’s her business? Have you ever seen a smaller apartment than this? Could you ever live like this?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,863,599 views • 4 months ago

THE LEFT LOST ITS MIND. Sydney Sweeney does a clean sports ad and they act like she burned the Constitution. Same people send fan mail to Lindsay Clancy after she murdered her three kids. That is not justice. That is not compassion. That is a sickness. They cannot beat beauty, so they try to shame it. Meanwhile a child killer gets letters like she is a celebrity. Disgusting. Said it on my podcast.
0:49

THE LEFT LOST ITS MIND. Sydney Sweeney does a clean sports ad and they act like she burned the Constitution. Same people send fan mail to Lindsay Clancy after she murdered her three kids. That is not justice. That is not compassion. That is a sickness. They cannot beat beauty, so they try to shame it. Meanwhile a child killer gets letters like she is a celebrity. Disgusting. Said it on my podcast.

Gunther Eagleman™

31,122 views • 9 days ago

Meghan Markle infamous curtsy reenactment in the Netflix series was not a quirky anecdote. It was a glaring window into Meghan’s character, & it spectacularly backfired. By turning a simple gesture of respect into an over the top, sarcastic performance, complete with the mocking “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” she did not merely poke fun at royal protocol. She openly disrespected her husband’s grandmother and the cultural traditions she was marrying into. You do not have to adore the monarchy to show basic decency. Mocking it on a global stage is not empowerment. It is pettiness wrapped in self righteousness. It is contempt. What makes it worse is the attempt to sell this as innocence. She was not a sheltered teenager from another planet. She was a middle aged actress who had dated a prince, lived in the UK, and actively sought proximity to that world. She knew she was joining one of the most scrutinised families on earth. She could have asked. She could have researched. She could have practised quietly. Instead, she weaponised the moment years later. And Harry fares no better in this story. A man raised in palaces mentions curtsying in the car, yet apparently never bothers to explain what actually matters. Then he sits back while his wife mocks the moment on camera. Pretending she thought curtsying was some medieval parody is performative ignorance. That is not naïveté. It is affectation. Harry was complicit in the shade throwing, prioritising their grievance narrative over basic respect for his own family. What Meghan failed to understand is that respecting another culture does not diminish you. It elevates you. Courtesy is not submission. Learning customs is not erasure. When you marry into another family, another country, another culture, the basic adult response is to observe, learn, and show respect. Millions of people move across cultures every day. They learn greetings, gestures, and etiquette not because they are forced to, but because respect is universal. You honour others and in doing so you show character. Meghan chose the opposite. She treated unfamiliarity as something to sneer at, as if curiosity and humility were beneath her. The late Queen would not have cared about a perfect curtsy during their first meeting. She met presidents, dictators, pop stars, and children. She was pragmatic, warm, and famously forgiving of protocol mishaps. A genuine smile and a simple “Nice to meet you” would have been more than enough. Instead, Meghan chose theatrical disdain, reducing a lifetime of duty and service into a punchline for Netflix dollars. It was not funny. It was mean spirited, and it revealed someone who views other people’s customs as beneath her. That exaggerated curtsy was not for the Queen. It was for the audience Meghan always imagines watching her. The moment was not lived. It was stored, packaged, and later monetised. That is the pattern. Nothing is private. Everything is content. Every interaction is reduced to a punchline that flatters her and diminishes others. This moment was never really about a curtsy. It was about attitude. A woman secure in herself does not need to belittle someone else’s traditions to feel superior. She does not turn cultural difference into comedy and later into grievance. She adapts. She listens. She observes. That is how you gain respect without asking for it. If anything, that exaggerated curtsy made her look small, not modern. True confidence does not perform contempt. It practises respect quietly, even when the cameras are off. She did not merely reveal herself. She ruined herself, slowly and publicly, through moments like this. She did not need the press to torpedo her image. Her own words and performances did that for her. Respect is not about agreement. It is about not being gratuitously rude. Meghan’s mockery achieved the opposite. It made her appear insecure, arrogant, and unwilling to bridge any gap.
0:21

Meghan Markle infamous curtsy reenactment in the Netflix series was not a quirky anecdote. It was a glaring window into Meghan’s character, & it spectacularly backfired. By turning a simple gesture of respect into an over the top, sarcastic performance, complete with the mocking “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” she did not merely poke fun at royal protocol. She openly disrespected her husband’s grandmother and the cultural traditions she was marrying into. You do not have to adore the monarchy to show basic decency. Mocking it on a global stage is not empowerment. It is pettiness wrapped in self righteousness. It is contempt. What makes it worse is the attempt to sell this as innocence. She was not a sheltered teenager from another planet. She was a middle aged actress who had dated a prince, lived in the UK, and actively sought proximity to that world. She knew she was joining one of the most scrutinised families on earth. She could have asked. She could have researched. She could have practised quietly. Instead, she weaponised the moment years later. And Harry fares no better in this story. A man raised in palaces mentions curtsying in the car, yet apparently never bothers to explain what actually matters. Then he sits back while his wife mocks the moment on camera. Pretending she thought curtsying was some medieval parody is performative ignorance. That is not naïveté. It is affectation. Harry was complicit in the shade throwing, prioritising their grievance narrative over basic respect for his own family. What Meghan failed to understand is that respecting another culture does not diminish you. It elevates you. Courtesy is not submission. Learning customs is not erasure. When you marry into another family, another country, another culture, the basic adult response is to observe, learn, and show respect. Millions of people move across cultures every day. They learn greetings, gestures, and etiquette not because they are forced to, but because respect is universal. You honour others and in doing so you show character. Meghan chose the opposite. She treated unfamiliarity as something to sneer at, as if curiosity and humility were beneath her. The late Queen would not have cared about a perfect curtsy during their first meeting. She met presidents, dictators, pop stars, and children. She was pragmatic, warm, and famously forgiving of protocol mishaps. A genuine smile and a simple “Nice to meet you” would have been more than enough. Instead, Meghan chose theatrical disdain, reducing a lifetime of duty and service into a punchline for Netflix dollars. It was not funny. It was mean spirited, and it revealed someone who views other people’s customs as beneath her. That exaggerated curtsy was not for the Queen. It was for the audience Meghan always imagines watching her. The moment was not lived. It was stored, packaged, and later monetised. That is the pattern. Nothing is private. Everything is content. Every interaction is reduced to a punchline that flatters her and diminishes others. This moment was never really about a curtsy. It was about attitude. A woman secure in herself does not need to belittle someone else’s traditions to feel superior. She does not turn cultural difference into comedy and later into grievance. She adapts. She listens. She observes. That is how you gain respect without asking for it. If anything, that exaggerated curtsy made her look small, not modern. True confidence does not perform contempt. It practises respect quietly, even when the cameras are off. She did not merely reveal herself. She ruined herself, slowly and publicly, through moments like this. She did not need the press to torpedo her image. Her own words and performances did that for her. Respect is not about agreement. It is about not being gratuitously rude. Meghan’s mockery achieved the opposite. It made her appear insecure, arrogant, and unwilling to bridge any gap.

Queen Esther

185,709 views • 8 months ago

This is what it looks like when your a malignant narcissist who has been caught in a lie. But notice what she does, she doesn’t actually refute the claims that her husband got into an accident with a loaded firearm three times above the legal limit. She makes it about how she was never contacted by the press and she would have been you know she’s enemy number one. Except she’s not. We’ve seen what the leftist media does to you if you’re actually dangerous to their agenda look at what they did to Trump and his family. They’re not doing that to her. Do you know the amount of skeletons that they could uncover if the entire leftist media apparatus went after her the way that they go after Trump or the way that they go after anybody else who they want to take down. They don’t touch her because they need her because they love her because she hates America. And that makes her a big ass asset for the Democratic Party.
11:15

This is what it looks like when your a malignant narcissist who has been caught in a lie. But notice what she does, she doesn’t actually refute the claims that her husband got into an accident with a loaded firearm three times above the legal limit. She makes it about how she was never contacted by the press and she would have been you know she’s enemy number one. Except she’s not. We’ve seen what the leftist media does to you if you’re actually dangerous to their agenda look at what they did to Trump and his family. They’re not doing that to her. Do you know the amount of skeletons that they could uncover if the entire leftist media apparatus went after her the way that they go after Trump or the way that they go after anybody else who they want to take down. They don’t touch her because they need her because they love her because she hates America. And that makes her a big ass asset for the Democratic Party.

Insurrection Barbie

111,734 views • 4 months ago