正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Shell's biofuels flagship just hit reality. In Rotterdam, Shell was building what was meant to be Europe's largest biofuel plant at a cost of €1.2 billion. The annual output target was 820,000 tons of so-called "sustainable" aviation fuel and "renewable" diesel. The feedstock was supposed to be used frying...

32,347 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

14 条评论

Dan Brennan 的头像
Dan Brennan4 天前

It would be interesting for someone to calculate how much "carbon" was released in the creation of all the failed "green" energy plants such as this one, and Ivanpah, and others around the world.

Gregory Schnaible 的头像
Gregory Schnaible4 天前

The green new deal is a globalist myth

Erik EnergiePro 的头像
Erik EnergiePro4 天前

The binding constraint was feedstock. Europe's used cooking oil supply is a fraction of 820,000 t/a, and importing palm oil byproducts defeats the label. Which ReFuelEU sub-mandate assumed this arithmetic worked?

Мike 的头像
Мike3 天前

@JoostJansen6

It doesn't add up... 的头像
It doesn't add up...4 天前

They should build another hydrocracker that can produce close to 60% weight on feed as jet fuel, like the one in Singapore.

Quinn Parker 的头像
Quinn Parker4 天前

Not surprised. Biofuels always felt like a detour dressed up as a destination. Meanwhile wind and solar keep quietly getting on with it #CleanEnergy #Renewables

Pat 的头像
Pat4 天前

Data center anyone?

Mr. Ted Silberstein 的头像
Mr. Ted Silberstein3 天前

Lawsuit avoidance via performance is expensive.

gene syvenky 的头像
gene syvenky4 天前

Wow a staggering miss on the market.....

Paul 的头像
Paul3 天前

@AlboMP hi mate just letting you know the black stuff in the ground we still need it now and moving forward

GB_Dorset 的头像
GB_Dorset4 天前

Imagine how many chips we would have to eat to feed that refinery!!

Peter Jeffries 的头像
Peter Jeffries3 天前

Bio fuels are not a fairytale. Renewables are, when we consider materials and whole life expectancy? What isn't a fairytale are dedicated SMRs that could pump out biofuels 24/7 365 for 60 years. Add fusion power that's already proven for the future. We don't need renewables.

James Harris 的头像
James Harris3 天前

That supply stock is laughable.

Go CO₂↑! 的头像
Go CO₂↑!4 天前

What a relief!

相关视频

🚨 The Paxil scandal is an astonishing example of how drug data can be hidden and spun—and then sold to kids. “In the late 90s, the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline or GSK did a series of trials and found that the drug was no better than placebo. …There was an email that was sent to staff where GSK said that [it] would be commercially unacceptable to disclose the poor efficacy data of this drug. So instead of telling the truth, they hired a PR firm to write the medical journal for them, to ghostwrite the article and put a positive spin on it, and then that was submitted to the journal, and it was published in 2001. And it wasn't long before the regulators in the US and also in Europe discovered that the drug actually was increasing the risk of suicidal ideation. It was doing the exact opposite of what the drug was meant to do. And so they put out a warning saying that this drug showed no efficacy in children and adolescents, but the drug continued to be marketed off-label…because the prominent journal had published this peer-reviewed paper. GSK purchased thousands of pre-prints and sent them out to all their representatives, and then they went to doctors, giving free samples, saying this drug is safe and effective for children. And I think within a time span of three years, GSK made over a billion dollars in sales from a drug that had never proven to be safe or effective in children and adolescents.” -Investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Jan Jekielek

140,141 次观看 • 10 个月前