正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

She’s crying that she can’t feed her kids without working two jobs… while rocking tattoos and a nose ring. Her mom had to pay for a new dishwasher while her washing machine is broken. No father in sight helping raise the kids or split the bills. This is the...

57,996 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 次观看 • 5 个月前

Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping Here’s breakdown of Brian Entin’s most recent video: Maureen O’Connel is the guest. 💖 (We missed you Moc007 ) -Maureen thought someone would be in custody by now and believes everything is up to forensic genetic genealogy “because that’s the only thing that really takes this long” -She says she still goes back and fourth on her thoughts of believing one or more people were involved. She says she’s always thought there were at least two but is now wondering if maybe it could’ve just been one perp since the $1.2 million hasn’t been claimed. -She still believes if there were two people that one of them is likely dead Brian asks Maureen “So you think that if it is more than one person and there’s a mastermind, they may have killed the guy at the door to keep him quiet?” Maureen says “Yes” Brian and Maureen agree that this would explain why everything has gone silent. -Maureen says there are so many cases where everyone thinks someone got away with something and then a year later an arrest is made -She notes that porch guy seemed “too performative” and she believes there’s got to be a reason for that. (She is referencing the gun holster, the gun placement, the mask, the gloves, the clothing) -She is still confident that the perp will be caught. -Maureen cautions people to not expect more from Savannah than they would from any other victim. Savannah has small children a husband and a life she has to resume to life like anyone else. -She mentions that she’s curious why Tomasso hasn’t been a spokesperson for the family because it’s clear Annie and Savannah are broken and yes he is a family member but Nancy was not his mother. -Maureen does not believe this is a cold case #NancyGuthrieKidnapping #NancyGuthrieMissing #NancyGuthriecase

𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘦𝘊𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘣𝘦𝘳🫶🏼

32,844 次观看 • 3 个月前

Okay, kids…the word of the day is “Deflection”. Deflection is what someone does when they know that they fucked up and they are desperate to not admit that they fucked up. Jess just did a whole presentation because she claims that Expert and Will accused her of swatting their event and then she showed her evidence of their accusations…this is her evidence… - The Expert repeated things that Jess said to Baker in messages, told her that she doesn’t know who’s listening and her words have power, and then mentioned the Jodie Foster and John Hinckley situation. Jess claims that this is Expert accusing her but the part she’s leaving out is Hinkley attempted to assassinate President Reagan in hopes to impress Jodie Foster. So Expert was not accusing her of doing the swatting - he was accusing someone that supports Jess of swatting. - Will tweeted “I wanted to send a big “thank you” to whoever the spineless twat was who had such a problem with Baker defending himself from horrible accusations from an ‘independent journalist’ that they attempted to SWAT Expert live show and meet and greet in Knoxville last night.” That is Will accusing someone who has a problem with Baker defending himself against Jess’ accusations of swatting - not Jess herself. Jess is a very intelligent person so I know that she knows that what she’s saying isn’t true. But she put a lot of work into disproving an accusation that was never made by any content creators…why? Because she knows that saying that someone “preys on women” and calling someone a “predator” is the same damn thing and because she knows that there is a massive difference between shit talking someone and accusing someone of being unsafe for women to be around. And she doesn’t want to admit either of those things so she’s got to direct everyone’s attention somewhere else and “prove her innocence” there. Also, she was really crying “victim!” because months ago Will made a couple posts shitting on her and “nobody spoke up for her!” But the part she’s leaving out is why Will was shitting on her - she had very publicly accused him of lying about not hearing the infamous recording cuz she claimed that she “knew” he did hear it. That’s why Will was pissed. You don’t get to throw the first punch and then play the victim when they hit back, babe.

Alyssa M.

27,072 次观看 • 2 个月前

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 次观看 • 3 个月前

This woman is openly announcing that she’s actively sabotaging her own children’s futures and then daring the school to fail them for it. is proudly announcing her three kids (12, 10, and 6) have never done homework and never will. She skips every parent-teacher conference because she “doesn’t care.” Her exact words: “My job as a parent is to play with my kids. Your job as a teacher is to teach my kid.” She even admits she doesn’t know algebra and refuses to learn it. Homework isn’t busywork. It’s how kids reinforce what they learned, how parents stay aware of what’s actually being taught, and how children build the basic discipline of finishing something when they don’t feel like it. She has cut all three of those things out of their lives on purpose. She’s not protecting their childhood. She’s training them that effort is optional and someone else is always responsible for the outcome. That mindset does not produce adults who can hold a job, meet deadlines, or compete. It produces people who hit real expectations and fold. She is not raising free-spirited children. She is raising children who will hit the wall of real expectations — jobs, bills, deadlines, skill requirements — with no practice at meeting them. That is setting them up for failure. Not metaphorical failure. Actual, measurable underachievement and limited options. Her own admission that she can’t and won’t do algebra is the tell. She is modeling the exact attitude she is teaching her kids: if it’s hard or inconvenient, reject it and blame the institution. This is not bold parenting. It’s open neglect dressed up as boundaries. She is actively setting her own kids up for failure.

DocumentingLibs

103,445 次观看 • 29 天前