Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Shortly after Robinson’s arrest, the prosecutors released a probable cause affidavit detailing the evidence gathered immediately after Charlie’s assassination. The evidence presented at that time was overwhelming. In the months that have followed, we know the investigation has continued. More details will come out in May, when the assassin... has a probable cause hearing and we are certain there will be even more evidence demonstrating why the State believes Tyler Robinson is the assassin. But now we have a government official, Joe Kent, who has reportedly indicated he is willing to testify on behalf of the defense, to get Robinson off the hook for an evil he committed. Joe Kent just crossed a red line, and it's a massive betrayal of Charlie, his wife, his kids, and the entire TPUSA family. Just because HE didnt get let into the investigation doesnt mean it wasn't investigated.show more

Andrew Kolvet

306,375 subscribers

880,496 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?

HustleBitch

23,159 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Michael Shellenberger interviewed Joe Kent and is reporting that he's willing to testify in the defense of Tyler Robinson. Here's my interview with Michael Shellenberger, posted in FULL. But let me add this... If Israel, Egyptian planes, or any foreign government killed Charlie, I want to know. I was not afraid of that being the truth (which is why I shared the group chat in the first place). But here we are, over six months having passed, and there have been ZERO actionable facts to back any of these theories up. There has been ZERO evidence presented of a broader conspiracy. If Joe Kent has proof, he needs to present it, otherwise all he's doing is sowing chaos and aiding and abetting a murderer.

Michael Shellenberger interviewed Joe Kent and is reporting that he's willing to testify in the defense of Tyler Robinson. Here's my interview with Michael Shellenberger, posted in FULL. But let me add this... If Israel, Egyptian planes, or any foreign government killed Charlie, I want to know. I was not afraid of that being the truth (which is why I shared the group chat in the first place). But here we are, over six months having passed, and there have been ZERO actionable facts to back any of these theories up. There has been ZERO evidence presented of a broader conspiracy. If Joe Kent has proof, he needs to present it, otherwise all he's doing is sowing chaos and aiding and abetting a murderer.

Andrew Kolvet

294,356 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

.Libby Emmons to Jack Posobiec on Tyler Robinson’s defense team’s motion to delay trial over probable cause: “The prosecutors are saying there is probable cause to believe that Robinson is Charlie Kirk’s killer. That he is the one who took a rifle to Utah Valley University and opened fire.”

.Libby Emmons to Jack Posobiec on Tyler Robinson’s defense team’s motion to delay trial over probable cause: “The prosecutors are saying there is probable cause to believe that Robinson is Charlie Kirk’s killer. That he is the one who took a rifle to Utah Valley University and opened fire.”

Human Events

15,567 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 JUST NOW: Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's legal team is BEGGING the judge to not allow the case to go to trial for m*rder "This case should not proceed." Court is resuming on September 1st, and the judge will decide after that "[Prosecution] presented overwhelming video, DNA, and ballistics evidence to convince the judge to proceed to trial." "Robinson's lawyers argue the state has failed to establish probable cause that the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to another other than Charlie Kirk." They're flailing. They KNOW the walls are closing in Apparently, we could hit the 1-year mark since Charlie was assassinated before we know if there will be a trial. Unreal.

🚨 JUST NOW: Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's legal team is BEGGING the judge to not allow the case to go to trial for m*rder "This case should not proceed." Court is resuming on September 1st, and the judge will decide after that "[Prosecution] presented overwhelming video, DNA, and ballistics evidence to convince the judge to proceed to trial." "Robinson's lawyers argue the state has failed to establish probable cause that the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to another other than Charlie Kirk." They're flailing. They KNOW the walls are closing in Apparently, we could hit the 1-year mark since Charlie was assassinated before we know if there will be a trial. Unreal.

Eric Daugherty

74,286 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🚨MY THOUGHTS After Day 1 of the Preliminary Trial: Sitting in the courtroom for the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is a completely different experience than watching clips online. Seeing the defendant, hearing the testimony firsthand, and watching the evidence unfold in real time reinforces why due process matters. The State has presented evidence it argues establishes probable cause, the defense is doing its job by challenging that evidence, and the hearing is far from over. If you're following this case, watch the proceedings yourself instead of relying on social media narratives.

🚨MY THOUGHTS After Day 1 of the Preliminary Trial: Sitting in the courtroom for the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is a completely different experience than watching clips online. Seeing the defendant, hearing the testimony firsthand, and watching the evidence unfold in real time reinforces why due process matters. The State has presented evidence it argues establishes probable cause, the defense is doing its job by challenging that evidence, and the hearing is far from over. If you're following this case, watch the proceedings yourself instead of relying on social media narratives.

Brandon Tatum

196,100 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 JUST IN: The judge has APPROVED public release of some evidence involving Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson and transgender lover Lance Twiggs, during the preliminary hearing "The defendant's objection IS OVERRULED." Release AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, the liars are sweating right now because even more will come out.

🚨 JUST IN: The judge has APPROVED public release of some evidence involving Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson and transgender lover Lance Twiggs, during the preliminary hearing "The defendant's objection IS OVERRULED." Release AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, the liars are sweating right now because even more will come out.

Eric Daugherty

76,748 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Baron “Con Man” Coleman is the biggest fraud on the internet right now. We just witnessed the most compelling, overwhelming presentation of evidence in a televised probable cause hearing I’ve ever seen and this clown is out here telling his audience the case is about to fall apart and prosecutors can’t prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. “Tyler Robinson was not supposed to survive to turn himself in. I am now convinced of that.” Convinced by what, exactly? What evidence supports this? Or are you just making it up on the fly for clicks? (It’s the latter.) “Tyler Robinson was framed. I am now 100% convinced of that.” Cool story. Present the actual evidence for that claim, or admit you’re peddling conspiracy fan fiction. This failed lawyer turned podcast grifter is shamelessly exploiting gullible people for money and views while the evidence sits there in plain sight. He doesn’t just embarrass himself he makes the entire legal profession look bad. Real lawyers who still respect the law and the judicial process have an ethical obligation to call this out.

Baron “Con Man” Coleman is the biggest fraud on the internet right now. We just witnessed the most compelling, overwhelming presentation of evidence in a televised probable cause hearing I’ve ever seen and this clown is out here telling his audience the case is about to fall apart and prosecutors can’t prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. “Tyler Robinson was not supposed to survive to turn himself in. I am now convinced of that.” Convinced by what, exactly? What evidence supports this? Or are you just making it up on the fly for clicks? (It’s the latter.) “Tyler Robinson was framed. I am now 100% convinced of that.” Cool story. Present the actual evidence for that claim, or admit you’re peddling conspiracy fan fiction. This failed lawyer turned podcast grifter is shamelessly exploiting gullible people for money and views while the evidence sits there in plain sight. He doesn’t just embarrass himself he makes the entire legal profession look bad. Real lawyers who still respect the law and the judicial process have an ethical obligation to call this out.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

132,096 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Joe Kent could be in some serious s'hit Kent told Shellenberger there was a foreign influence involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk Andrew Kolvet ~ just bc he didn't get let into the investigation, doesn't mean it wasn't investigated Kent better be able to prove this or he's going down

🚨Joe Kent could be in some serious s'hit Kent told Shellenberger there was a foreign influence involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk Andrew Kolvet ~ just bc he didn't get let into the investigation, doesn't mean it wasn't investigated Kent better be able to prove this or he's going down

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

34,603 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Defense lawyer Michael Burt, who previously represented Lyle Menendez, just lobbed a despicable passive aggressive attack at the Kirk Family claiming Erika held "press conferences" on the case (total lie) after family rep Jeff Neiman requested the family be able to see the enhanced video compilation of Robinson on campus. Good for Neiman immediately setting the record straight after Burt's flurry of misrepresentations. This guy was totally out of line. "There was a lot that was just said that's just not true." "The family has not seen this video. [The family] doesn't have access to the evidence the state has. The state is the state, and Mrs. Kirk and the family have their representatives." "That is a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth, and this isn't about educating anybody about anything. This is about allowing the family to see the evidence that's been gathered after a 10-month investigation in which a father, a husband, was assassinated." "That's what this is about. So we ask you to please allow the family to view the video like the court has viewed, in order to allow the family to process this moment."

Defense lawyer Michael Burt, who previously represented Lyle Menendez, just lobbed a despicable passive aggressive attack at the Kirk Family claiming Erika held "press conferences" on the case (total lie) after family rep Jeff Neiman requested the family be able to see the enhanced video compilation of Robinson on campus. Good for Neiman immediately setting the record straight after Burt's flurry of misrepresentations. This guy was totally out of line. "There was a lot that was just said that's just not true." "The family has not seen this video. [The family] doesn't have access to the evidence the state has. The state is the state, and Mrs. Kirk and the family have their representatives." "That is a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth, and this isn't about educating anybody about anything. This is about allowing the family to see the evidence that's been gathered after a 10-month investigation in which a father, a husband, was assassinated." "That's what this is about. So we ask you to please allow the family to view the video like the court has viewed, in order to allow the family to process this moment."

Andrew Kolvet

317,635 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 The attorney for Erika Kirk and the family just addressed Judge Graf directly. His argument: the family hasn't seen the video evidence, and they should get to. His words to the court: "There's a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth." And on what this hearing is really about: "This is about allowing the family to see the evidence" gathered after a 10 month investigation "in which a father, a husband was assassinated." He asked the judge to let the family view the video the way the court has, so they can process the moment. For the record: this is the victim's representative speaking, not the state and not the defense. Three different sets of lawyers, three different interests in that room.

🚨 The attorney for Erika Kirk and the family just addressed Judge Graf directly. His argument: the family hasn't seen the video evidence, and they should get to. His words to the court: "There's a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth." And on what this hearing is really about: "This is about allowing the family to see the evidence" gathered after a 10 month investigation "in which a father, a husband was assassinated." He asked the judge to let the family view the video the way the court has, so they can process the moment. For the record: this is the victim's representative speaking, not the state and not the defense. Three different sets of lawyers, three different interests in that room.

Danks

22,478 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

Curtis Houck

277,771 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 NOW: Tyler Robinson's defense is in UTTER SHAMBLES after overwhelming evidence and footage was exposed in court, clearly showing Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk The liars are COOKED. ERIKA KIRK: "It brings our family comfort to note that the world has witnessed the overwhelming evidence of what occurred to Charlie that day." 🙏🏻

🚨 NOW: Tyler Robinson's defense is in UTTER SHAMBLES after overwhelming evidence and footage was exposed in court, clearly showing Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk The liars are COOKED. ERIKA KIRK: "It brings our family comfort to note that the world has witnessed the overwhelming evidence of what occurred to Charlie that day." 🙏🏻

Eric Daugherty

154,102 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🔥👀WOW.. “WE MAY GET TO THE TESTIMONY OF LANCE TWIGGS TODAY” -Jack Posobiec Rush Limbaugh’s widow has even showed up just now outside of the courthouse. Donald Trump Jr has been there as well. Jack Posobiec discusses the movements on camera of Tyler Robinson & what is necessary to secure a conviction which begins with placing him at the scene. He also discusses the METICULOUS TRACKING of the one person on the roof alone alleged to be Tyler Robinson… even eating Chick-Fil-A on the campus before the assassination and the possibility he USED HIS CREDIT/DEBIT CARD which may provide further evidence it was Robinson on campus.

🔥👀WOW.. “WE MAY GET TO THE TESTIMONY OF LANCE TWIGGS TODAY” -Jack Posobiec Rush Limbaugh’s widow has even showed up just now outside of the courthouse. Donald Trump Jr has been there as well. Jack Posobiec discusses the movements on camera of Tyler Robinson & what is necessary to secure a conviction which begins with placing him at the scene. He also discusses the METICULOUS TRACKING of the one person on the roof alone alleged to be Tyler Robinson… even eating Chick-Fil-A on the campus before the assassination and the possibility he USED HIS CREDIT/DEBIT CARD which may provide further evidence it was Robinson on campus.

Johnny St.Pete

53,514 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨TRIAL UPDATE: One of the biggest developments yet in the Charlie Kirk case. According to testimony, Tyler Robinson turned himself in with the help of his parents and a family friend. Investigators testified they interviewed them first, and only then arrested Robinson after developing probable cause. Meanwhile, the defense is fighting to keep parts of Lance Twiggs' interview from being played in court. If the judge allows it, that testimony could become one of the most significant pieces of evidence presented so far. The more evidence comes out, the more online conspiracy theories continue to fall apart. Watch the evidence—not the rumors.

🚨TRIAL UPDATE: One of the biggest developments yet in the Charlie Kirk case. According to testimony, Tyler Robinson turned himself in with the help of his parents and a family friend. Investigators testified they interviewed them first, and only then arrested Robinson after developing probable cause. Meanwhile, the defense is fighting to keep parts of Lance Twiggs' interview from being played in court. If the judge allows it, that testimony could become one of the most significant pieces of evidence presented so far. The more evidence comes out, the more online conspiracy theories continue to fall apart. Watch the evidence—not the rumors.

Brandon Tatum

98,569 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Shimla, Himachal Pradesh: SP Sanjeev Gandhi says, "...On behalf of CID, a case was registered at Police Station Chhota Shimla and during the investigation in that case, the name of the personal staff of the Director General of Police came up. But when we tried to question his PA, he obstructed the investigation, which he should not have done. He misused his position and handed over the investigation to the CID. It is very surprising that he wanted the investigation to be done by an officer of his choice. Similarly, recently we received a complaint which has allegations against him...We brought all these things to the notice of the government and the Advocate General's office...We are fully committed to providing justice to late Vimal Negi. Why will we spare any criminal? When we can file an affidavit against the sitting DGP, no one should doubt our intentions..."

#WATCH | Shimla, Himachal Pradesh: SP Sanjeev Gandhi says, "...On behalf of CID, a case was registered at Police Station Chhota Shimla and during the investigation in that case, the name of the personal staff of the Director General of Police came up. But when we tried to question his PA, he obstructed the investigation, which he should not have done. He misused his position and handed over the investigation to the CID. It is very surprising that he wanted the investigation to be done by an officer of his choice. Similarly, recently we received a complaint which has allegations against him...We brought all these things to the notice of the government and the Advocate General's office...We are fully committed to providing justice to late Vimal Negi. Why will we spare any criminal? When we can file an affidavit against the sitting DGP, no one should doubt our intentions..."

ANI

76,755 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING:🚨 John Solomon reports that the FBI allegedly launched an investigation into Joe Kent in “late 2025”. The timing of that investigation is interesting. Here’s why. On Oct 29th, 2025 it was reported that the FBI shut down Joe Kent’s probe into possible foreign ties to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Joe Kent confirmed that report in a recent interview with Tucker. Kent said he was running down multiple leads suggesting a possible foreign nexus into Kirk’s assassination but was STOPPED by the FBI. The FBI’s investigation into Joe Kent, appearing to have been launched around the same time Kent claims he was told by the FBI to stop investigating the foreign ties, leaves more questions than answers. Watch below . 👇

BREAKING:🚨 John Solomon reports that the FBI allegedly launched an investigation into Joe Kent in “late 2025”. The timing of that investigation is interesting. Here’s why. On Oct 29th, 2025 it was reported that the FBI shut down Joe Kent’s probe into possible foreign ties to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Joe Kent confirmed that report in a recent interview with Tucker. Kent said he was running down multiple leads suggesting a possible foreign nexus into Kirk’s assassination but was STOPPED by the FBI. The FBI’s investigation into Joe Kent, appearing to have been launched around the same time Kent claims he was told by the FBI to stop investigating the foreign ties, leaves more questions than answers. Watch below . 👇

Heather Mullins

23,358 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨Was Joe Kent Candace Owens’ mole in the US government, feeding her information about the Charlie Kirk investigation? On October 1, 2025, Candace Owens said she was “very aware of what’s going on” and claimed that “about 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie Kirk informed people at Turning Point, Jewish donors, as well as a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause.” She was directly quoting a message Charlie Kirk had sent in a group chat before his death - a message Candace revealed on her show a week later. TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet revealed the next day, on October 8, that he was in the group chat and had taken that screenshot, and that, “to leave no stone unturned,” he had passed it on to “people in government” for the sake of the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death, saying, “I don’t know where it went from there, apparently.” Pointing to the fact that it landed in Candace Owens' lap. The New York Times reported on October 28 that Joe Kent, while still serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, had: “examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power, or another entity, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.” Which, according to the Times article: “alarmed Kash Patel, the director of the FBI. Mr. Patel and other senior officials believed Mr. Kent was overstepping, treading on FBI responsibilities, and potentially interfering with the investigation and the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler Robinson.” After resigning from his role as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show today. Speaking about the Charlie Kirk investigation, he said, “there’s still linkage for us to investigate,” and pointed directly to the group chat text messages that Andrew Kolvet had handed over to the US government - and that Candace Owens had used on her show - as evidence of that. It was also reported today that Joe Kent is under investigation by the FBI for allegedly leaking classified information while serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center. Considering that Candace Owens had access to a private message tied to the Charlie Kirk investigation - a message that was passed to government officials - and that Joe Kent was, at the same time, reviewing sensitive case material, is now reportedly under investigation for leaks, and has himself pointed to that same message as evidence of a broader conspiracy, The overlap is enough to raise a legitimate question about whether he could have been Candace Owens' source. I reached out to Joe Kent for comment, but he did not respond.

🚨Was Joe Kent Candace Owens’ mole in the US government, feeding her information about the Charlie Kirk investigation? On October 1, 2025, Candace Owens said she was “very aware of what’s going on” and claimed that “about 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie Kirk informed people at Turning Point, Jewish donors, as well as a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause.” She was directly quoting a message Charlie Kirk had sent in a group chat before his death - a message Candace revealed on her show a week later. TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet revealed the next day, on October 8, that he was in the group chat and had taken that screenshot, and that, “to leave no stone unturned,” he had passed it on to “people in government” for the sake of the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death, saying, “I don’t know where it went from there, apparently.” Pointing to the fact that it landed in Candace Owens' lap. The New York Times reported on October 28 that Joe Kent, while still serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, had: “examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power, or another entity, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.” Which, according to the Times article: “alarmed Kash Patel, the director of the FBI. Mr. Patel and other senior officials believed Mr. Kent was overstepping, treading on FBI responsibilities, and potentially interfering with the investigation and the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler Robinson.” After resigning from his role as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show today. Speaking about the Charlie Kirk investigation, he said, “there’s still linkage for us to investigate,” and pointed directly to the group chat text messages that Andrew Kolvet had handed over to the US government - and that Candace Owens had used on her show - as evidence of that. It was also reported today that Joe Kent is under investigation by the FBI for allegedly leaking classified information while serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center. Considering that Candace Owens had access to a private message tied to the Charlie Kirk investigation - a message that was passed to government officials - and that Joe Kent was, at the same time, reviewing sensitive case material, is now reportedly under investigation for leaks, and has himself pointed to that same message as evidence of a broader conspiracy, The overlap is enough to raise a legitimate question about whether he could have been Candace Owens' source. I reached out to Joe Kent for comment, but he did not respond.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

454,254 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge that while the FBI and ATF claimed in the probable cause statement that Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition round casings, and multiple towels, the prosecution never turned that evidence over, in physical or digital form, to the defense. Is that because it doesn’t exist? More conspiracy theories claiming that Trump staged his own assassination attempt will surely arise from this.

BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge that while the FBI and ATF claimed in the probable cause statement that Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition round casings, and multiple towels, the prosecution never turned that evidence over, in physical or digital form, to the defense. Is that because it doesn’t exist? More conspiracy theories claiming that Trump staged his own assassination attempt will surely arise from this.

Ed Krassenstein

1,139,926 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning. The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels. The prosecution never turned that evidence over. Not in physical form. Not in digital form. None of it. Is that because it doesn’t exist? The attempted assassination of a sitting president. And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced. Questions that deserve answers.

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning. The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels. The prosecution never turned that evidence over. Not in physical form. Not in digital form. None of it. Is that because it doesn’t exist? The attempted assassination of a sitting president. And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced. Questions that deserve answers.

Brian Allen

172,400 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten