Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Should Congress and the States make a Constitutional Amendment using Article V of Constitution to make an exclusive one time exception to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 (only natural born citizens), so #ElonMusk can run for President in #election2028? #election2024#WhiteHouse

PoliticAllUS

1,010 subscribers

108,987 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics #ElonMusk #election2028

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Ϩϣɛɛӷ_Ӈυϩӈɑʚʯɛ 🔞🏳️‍⚧️1 year ago

No, end of discussion.

PoliticAllUS1 year ago

Good point! Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Dik Wood1 year ago

Not only no, but hell fucking no under no circumstances.

PoliticAllUS1 year ago

Good point! Rules like these are definitely there for a reason. 👏 Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Calm Like a Bomb 💣1 year ago

Absolutely not

PoliticAllUS1 year ago

Good point! Rules like these are definitely there for a reason. 👏 Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Robert Phillips1 year ago

No. I like Elon, but that rule is there for a reason.

PoliticAllUS1 year ago

Good point! Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

ecruimcp1 year ago

No. Simple answer, no. He's great, I love what he is and does. But, no. As soon as an exception to that is made, our next president will be a BRICS funded and aligned foreigner. If you don't think that's the case, you're ignorance speaks volumes.

PoliticAllUS1 year ago

Good point! Rules like these are definitely there for a reason. 👏 Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Related Videos

Rep. Nancy Mace just proposed a constitutional amendment requiring Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural-born U.S. citizens — the same standard already required for President and Vice President. Mace posted: “We just introduced a long overdue joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to require Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural born citizens. This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet.” She points to Reps. Ilhan Omar (born in Somalia), Pramila Jayapal (born in India), and Shri Thanedar (born in India) as examples of divided loyalties. Passing a constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states — a very high bar. Should only natural-born Americans write our laws and judge our cases? (Video: AI)

Rep. Nancy Mace just proposed a constitutional amendment requiring Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural-born U.S. citizens — the same standard already required for President and Vice President. Mace posted: “We just introduced a long overdue joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to require Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural born citizens. This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet.” She points to Reps. Ilhan Omar (born in Somalia), Pramila Jayapal (born in India), and Shri Thanedar (born in India) as examples of divided loyalties. Passing a constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states — a very high bar. Should only natural-born Americans write our laws and judge our cases? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

321,251 views • 26 days ago

🚨 Rep. Nancy Mace joined me on Fox News to discuss the interplay between the Constitution's Article II, Section 2 Commander in Chief clause and Article I Section 8, which gives Congress the power to declare war.

🚨 Rep. Nancy Mace joined me on Fox News to discuss the interplay between the Constitution's Article II, Section 2 Commander in Chief clause and Article I Section 8, which gives Congress the power to declare war.

Kayleigh McEnany

120,897 views • 3 months ago

We need term limits for members of Congress. Florida has already certified a proposed amendment under Article V of the Constitution and other states are poised to follow suit. At the invitation of the U.S. Term Limits organization, I traveled today to encourage other state legislators to follow Florida's lead and pass a resolution to call for a constitutional amendment for congressional term limits. We will never turn our country around if we don't change the incentives in DC. Term limits are supported by huge majorities of Americans -- it's time to make it happen!

We need term limits for members of Congress. Florida has already certified a proposed amendment under Article V of the Constitution and other states are poised to follow suit. At the invitation of the U.S. Term Limits organization, I traveled today to encourage other state legislators to follow Florida's lead and pass a resolution to call for a constitutional amendment for congressional term limits. We will never turn our country around if we don't change the incentives in DC. Term limits are supported by huge majorities of Americans -- it's time to make it happen!

Ron DeSantis

1,717,273 views • 2 years ago

Q: “Judge, tell me what article V of the Constitution does?” Biden judicial nominee: “Article V is not coming to mind at the moment.” “How about article II?” Nominee: “Neither is Article II”

Q: “Judge, tell me what article V of the Constitution does?” Biden judicial nominee: “Article V is not coming to mind at the moment.” “How about article II?” Nominee: “Neither is Article II”

Washington Free Beacon

3,721,017 views • 3 years ago

Mike Johnson argues President Trump didn’t need Congress’ approval to attack Iran: “The framers of our Constitution never intended for the president to seek the approval of Congress every time he exercises his constitutional authority under Article 2.”

Mike Johnson argues President Trump didn’t need Congress’ approval to attack Iran: “The framers of our Constitution never intended for the president to seek the approval of Congress every time he exercises his constitutional authority under Article 2.”

The Recount

11,761 views • 11 months ago

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution gives President Trump authority to convene Congress on “extraordinary occasions.” With drone incursions and bombs at American military bases and an ongoing conflict with Iran, this is just such an occasion.

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution gives President Trump authority to convene Congress on “extraordinary occasions.” With drone incursions and bombs at American military bases and an ongoing conflict with Iran, this is just such an occasion.

Mike Lee

49,909 views • 2 months ago

At no point do the Articles of the Constitution state that the first lady may sit in for the President when he cannot fulfill his duties. In fact, article II section 1 explicitly states the vice president has that responsibility.

At no point do the Articles of the Constitution state that the first lady may sit in for the President when he cannot fulfill his duties. In fact, article II section 1 explicitly states the vice president has that responsibility.

The Redheaded libertarian

4,530,297 views • 1 year ago

Trump attorney Christina Bobb says the court ruling striking down Trump's tariffs is wrong because "if the president doesn't have the authority to make and change tariffs, who does?" Um, Congress, as explicitly spelled out in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution?

Trump attorney Christina Bobb says the court ruling striking down Trump's tariffs is wrong because "if the president doesn't have the authority to make and change tariffs, who does?" Um, Congress, as explicitly spelled out in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution?

Right Wing Watch

432,291 views • 9 months ago

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Admits the Operation Epic Fury is a WAR So much for Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, that Congress holds the exclusive power to formally declare war.

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Admits the Operation Epic Fury is a WAR So much for Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, that Congress holds the exclusive power to formally declare war.

Ryan Rozbiani

44,516 views • 3 months ago

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to limit jurisdiction of federal courts. My Injunctive Authority Clarification Act does exactly that. Woke activist judges must be not allowed to make sweeping legislative decisions for all Americans.

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to limit jurisdiction of federal courts. My Injunctive Authority Clarification Act does exactly that. Woke activist judges must be not allowed to make sweeping legislative decisions for all Americans.

Rep Andy Biggs

414,409 views • 1 year ago

Only natural born citizens should serve in Congress. No dual citizens should be allowed to serve either. I can’t be the only one who feels this way.

Only natural born citizens should serve in Congress. No dual citizens should be allowed to serve either. I can’t be the only one who feels this way.

Derrick Evans

19,539 views • 26 days ago

Raskin: I heard one of our colleagues across the aisle just say, “Well, yes, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 does give Congress the exclusive, plenary, comprehensive power to declare war and not the president. And we could be debating it, but the president has already taken us to war, so it’s too late. It would undermine the cause for us to debate it.” What a humiliating, self-defeating argument for a member of the Article I branch of Congress to be making. Don’t you understand? That destroys our power to declare war if any president can plunge us into a war and thereby defeat our exclusive, plenary power over it—

Raskin: I heard one of our colleagues across the aisle just say, “Well, yes, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 does give Congress the exclusive, plenary, comprehensive power to declare war and not the president. And we could be debating it, but the president has already taken us to war, so it’s too late. It would undermine the cause for us to debate it.” What a humiliating, self-defeating argument for a member of the Article I branch of Congress to be making. Don’t you understand? That destroys our power to declare war if any president can plunge us into a war and thereby defeat our exclusive, plenary power over it—

Acyn

406,003 views • 3 months ago

Congress should embark on an Article I project—a bold reassertion of its constitutional primacy.

Congress should embark on an Article I project—a bold reassertion of its constitutional primacy.

Rep. Ritchie Torres

19,776 views • 11 months ago

If the President has to be natural born, so should Congress, our judges, and our governors. American patriots should run America.

If the President has to be natural born, so should Congress, our judges, and our governors. American patriots should run America.

Nancy Mace

86,095 views • 24 days ago

MURKOWSKI: Has the administration considered seeking an authorization for use of military force from Congress? HEGSETH: Our view is that should the president make the decision to recommence, we would have all the authorities to do so under Article 2

MURKOWSKI: Has the administration considered seeking an authorization for use of military force from Congress? HEGSETH: Our view is that should the president make the decision to recommence, we would have all the authorities to do so under Article 2

Aaron Rupar

91,536 views • 1 month ago

Presidents should, consistent with Article II, have the power to fire anyone working in the executive branch—with the vice president being the sole exception

Presidents should, consistent with Article II, have the power to fire anyone working in the executive branch—with the vice president being the sole exception

Mike Lee

248,852 views • 1 year ago

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.

Senator Rand Paul

217,072 views • 2 months ago

We have 535 Members of Congress but just one President. That's why we need a bipartisan independent commission under the 25th Amendment to make sure this president—and all future presidents—are fit to discharge the duties of their office. Congress should pass H.R. 8275 to fill this constitutional void.

We have 535 Members of Congress but just one President. That's why we need a bipartisan independent commission under the 25th Amendment to make sure this president—and all future presidents—are fit to discharge the duties of their office. Congress should pass H.R. 8275 to fill this constitutional void.

Rep. Jamie Raskin

172,891 views • 2 months ago