Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Should Congress and the States make a Constitutional Amendment using Article V of Constitution to make an exclusive one time exception to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 (only natural born citizens), so #ElonMusk can run for President in #election2028? #election2024#WhiteHouse

PoliticAll_US's profile picture

PoliticAllUS

1,010 subscribers

108,991 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика#ElonMusk#election2028
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Ϩϣɛɛӷ_Ӈυϩӈɑʚʯɛ 🔞🏳️‍⚧️
Ϩϣɛɛӷ_Ӈυϩӈɑʚʯɛ 🔞🏳️‍⚧️1 год назад

No, end of discussion.

Фото профиля PoliticAllUS
PoliticAllUS1 год назад

Good point! Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Фото профиля Dik Wood
Dik Wood1 год назад

Not only no, but hell fucking no under no circumstances.

Фото профиля PoliticAllUS
PoliticAllUS1 год назад

Good point! Rules like these are definitely there for a reason. 👏 Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Фото профиля Calm Like a Bomb 💣
Calm Like a Bomb 💣1 год назад

Absolutely not

Фото профиля PoliticAllUS
PoliticAllUS1 год назад

Good point! Rules like these are definitely there for a reason. 👏 Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Фото профиля Robert Phillips
Robert Phillips1 год назад

No. I like Elon, but that rule is there for a reason.

Фото профиля PoliticAllUS
PoliticAllUS1 год назад

Good point! Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Фото профиля ecruimcp
ecruimcp1 год назад

No. Simple answer, no. He's great, I love what he is and does. But, no. As soon as an exception to that is made, our next president will be a BRICS funded and aligned foreigner. If you don't think that's the case, you're ignorance speaks volumes.

Фото профиля PoliticAllUS
PoliticAllUS1 год назад

Good point! Rules like these are definitely there for a reason. 👏 Start debate on to share more thoughts like this!

Похожие видео

Rep. Nancy Mace just proposed a constitutional amendment requiring Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural-born U.S. citizens — the same standard already required for President and Vice President. Mace posted: “We just introduced a long overdue joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to require Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural born citizens. This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet.” She points to Reps. Ilhan Omar (born in Somalia), Pramila Jayapal (born in India), and Shri Thanedar (born in India) as examples of divided loyalties. Passing a constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states — a very high bar. Should only natural-born Americans write our laws and judge our cases? (Video: AI)
0:20

Rep. Nancy Mace just proposed a constitutional amendment requiring Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural-born U.S. citizens — the same standard already required for President and Vice President. Mace posted: “We just introduced a long overdue joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to require Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural born citizens. This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet.” She points to Reps. Ilhan Omar (born in Somalia), Pramila Jayapal (born in India), and Shri Thanedar (born in India) as examples of divided loyalties. Passing a constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states — a very high bar. Should only natural-born Americans write our laws and judge our cases? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

321,322 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Rep. Nancy Mace joined me on Fox News to discuss the interplay between the Constitution's Article II, Section 2 Commander in Chief clause and Article I Section 8, which gives Congress the power to declare war.
2:22

🚨 Rep. Nancy Mace joined me on Fox News to discuss the interplay between the Constitution's Article II, Section 2 Commander in Chief clause and Article I Section 8, which gives Congress the power to declare war.

Kayleigh McEnany

120,897 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

We need term limits for members of Congress. Florida has already certified a proposed amendment under Article V of the Constitution and other states are poised to follow suit. At the invitation of the U.S. Term Limits organization, I traveled today to encourage other state legislators to follow Florida's lead and pass a resolution to call for a constitutional amendment for congressional term limits. We will never turn our country around if we don't change the incentives in DC. Term limits are supported by huge majorities of Americans -- it's time to make it happen!
2:09

We need term limits for members of Congress. Florida has already certified a proposed amendment under Article V of the Constitution and other states are poised to follow suit. At the invitation of the U.S. Term Limits organization, I traveled today to encourage other state legislators to follow Florida's lead and pass a resolution to call for a constitutional amendment for congressional term limits. We will never turn our country around if we don't change the incentives in DC. Term limits are supported by huge majorities of Americans -- it's time to make it happen!

Ron DeSantis

1,717,273 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Q: “Judge, tell me what article V of the Constitution does?” Biden judicial nominee: “Article V is not coming to mind at the moment.” “How about article II?” Nominee: “Neither is Article II”
1:22

Q: “Judge, tell me what article V of the Constitution does?” Biden judicial nominee: “Article V is not coming to mind at the moment.” “How about article II?” Nominee: “Neither is Article II”

Washington Free Beacon

3,721,297 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Mike Johnson argues President Trump didn’t need Congress’ approval to attack Iran: “The framers of our Constitution never intended for the president to seek the approval of Congress every time he exercises his constitutional authority under Article 2.”
1:49

Mike Johnson argues President Trump didn’t need Congress’ approval to attack Iran: “The framers of our Constitution never intended for the president to seek the approval of Congress every time he exercises his constitutional authority under Article 2.”

The Recount

11,761 просмотров • 1 год назад

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution gives President Trump authority to convene Congress on “extraordinary occasions.” With drone incursions and bombs at American military bases and an ongoing conflict with Iran, this is just such an occasion.
0:41

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution gives President Trump authority to convene Congress on “extraordinary occasions.” With drone incursions and bombs at American military bases and an ongoing conflict with Iran, this is just such an occasion.

Mike Lee

49,909 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

At no point do the Articles of the Constitution state that the first lady may sit in for the President when he cannot fulfill his duties. In fact, article II section 1 explicitly states the vice president has that responsibility.
0:36

At no point do the Articles of the Constitution state that the first lady may sit in for the President when he cannot fulfill his duties. In fact, article II section 1 explicitly states the vice president has that responsibility.

The Redheaded libertarian

4,530,421 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trump attorney Christina Bobb says the court ruling striking down Trump's tariffs is wrong because "if the president doesn't have the authority to make and change tariffs, who does?" Um, Congress, as explicitly spelled out in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution?
0:24

Trump attorney Christina Bobb says the court ruling striking down Trump's tariffs is wrong because "if the president doesn't have the authority to make and change tariffs, who does?" Um, Congress, as explicitly spelled out in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution?

Right Wing Watch

432,291 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Admits the Operation Epic Fury is a WAR So much for Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, that Congress holds the exclusive power to formally declare war.
0:27

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Admits the Operation Epic Fury is a WAR So much for Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, that Congress holds the exclusive power to formally declare war.

Ryan Rozbiani

44,516 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to limit jurisdiction of federal courts. My Injunctive Authority Clarification Act does exactly that. Woke activist judges must be not allowed to make sweeping legislative decisions for all Americans.
1:13

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to limit jurisdiction of federal courts. My Injunctive Authority Clarification Act does exactly that. Woke activist judges must be not allowed to make sweeping legislative decisions for all Americans.

Rep Andy Biggs

414,438 просмотров • 1 год назад

Only natural born citizens should serve in Congress. No dual citizens should be allowed to serve either. I can’t be the only one who feels this way.
0:23

Only natural born citizens should serve in Congress. No dual citizens should be allowed to serve either. I can’t be the only one who feels this way.

Derrick Evans

19,553 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Raskin: I heard one of our colleagues across the aisle just say, “Well, yes, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 does give Congress the exclusive, plenary, comprehensive power to declare war and not the president. And we could be debating it, but the president has already taken us to war, so it’s too late. It would undermine the cause for us to debate it.” What a humiliating, self-defeating argument for a member of the Article I branch of Congress to be making. Don’t you understand? That destroys our power to declare war if any president can plunge us into a war and thereby defeat our exclusive, plenary power over it—
2:16

Raskin: I heard one of our colleagues across the aisle just say, “Well, yes, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 does give Congress the exclusive, plenary, comprehensive power to declare war and not the president. And we could be debating it, but the president has already taken us to war, so it’s too late. It would undermine the cause for us to debate it.” What a humiliating, self-defeating argument for a member of the Article I branch of Congress to be making. Don’t you understand? That destroys our power to declare war if any president can plunge us into a war and thereby defeat our exclusive, plenary power over it—

Acyn

406,020 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

If the President has to be natural born, so should Congress, our judges, and our governors. American patriots should run America.
3:45

If the President has to be natural born, so should Congress, our judges, and our governors. American patriots should run America.

Nancy Mace

86,207 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Congress should embark on an Article I project—a bold reassertion of its constitutional primacy.
0:21

Congress should embark on an Article I project—a bold reassertion of its constitutional primacy.

Rep. Ritchie Torres

19,776 просмотров • 1 год назад

MURKOWSKI: Has the administration considered seeking an authorization for use of military force from Congress? HEGSETH: Our view is that should the president make the decision to recommence, we would have all the authorities to do so under Article 2
0:48

MURKOWSKI: Has the administration considered seeking an authorization for use of military force from Congress? HEGSETH: Our view is that should the president make the decision to recommence, we would have all the authorities to do so under Article 2

Aaron Rupar

91,536 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Presidents should, consistent with Article II, have the power to fire anyone working in the executive branch—with the vice president being the sole exception
0:59

Presidents should, consistent with Article II, have the power to fire anyone working in the executive branch—with the vice president being the sole exception

Mike Lee

248,852 просмотров • 1 год назад

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.
1:27

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.

Senator Rand Paul

217,084 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ABC’s Jonathan Karl more radical than Zohran Kwame Mamdani? Mamdani rejects Karl’s idea of amending U.S. Constitution so the socialist could become President: Karl: “I got to ask you, I noticed that you’re turning 35 soon, right?...So you now hit one of the constitutional requirements to run for President. But there’s another one that says you have to be a natural born citizen. You were not born here. Do you think that’s something that should be changed in the constitution. It would take an amendment. But do you think that we should change that?” Mamdani: “No, the constitution looks good the way it is.”
0:40

ABC’s Jonathan Karl more radical than Zohran Kwame Mamdani? Mamdani rejects Karl’s idea of amending U.S. Constitution so the socialist could become President: Karl: “I got to ask you, I noticed that you’re turning 35 soon, right?...So you now hit one of the constitutional requirements to run for President. But there’s another one that says you have to be a natural born citizen. You were not born here. Do you think that’s something that should be changed in the constitution. It would take an amendment. But do you think that we should change that?” Mamdani: “No, the constitution looks good the way it is.”

Brent Baker 🇺🇲🇺🇦 🇮🇱

18,593 просмотров • 8 дней назад