Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Should free speech only apply to humans and not bots?

201,064 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Tricky Gnosis's profile picture
Tricky Gnosis1 year ago

Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech or the freedom of the press... There's your answer, in the text of the amendment.

Eddie's profile picture
Eddie1 year ago

"No free pass" So he and his buddy humans want to gate keep Um, how about nah

Tomer Rozenberg's profile picture
Tomer Rozenberg1 year ago

Free speech comes with responsibility. Bots can spread misinformation without accountability, so it’s important to draw a line between human expression and automated influence.

DanTheMan's profile picture
DanTheMan1 year ago

This guy is a WEF tyrant fuckstain. He’s not interested in freedom at all. He wants total control over speech of humans (even though he parries the censorship to “algorithms”…he very much wants to censor humans and not just chatbots).

russian peasant, gulag escape artist's profile picture
russian peasant, gulag escape artist1 year ago

Harari's diagnosis is wrong. We aren't polarized because of technological algorithms. We are polarized because we hold radically different values and those values conflict and no one knows how to reconcile them. Harari blames the algorithms because he wants to control them.

Isiah Sanders's profile picture
Isiah Sanders1 year ago

I thought by bots you were talking about all the MAGA supporters here on X.

Travis dunn's profile picture
Travis dunn1 year ago

Well considering computer code is protected speech Yes it's protected speech as well

30RoE's profile picture
30RoE1 year ago

It always ends with the government stepping in and censoring. Just back off.

T.A.R.S. 🕚's profile picture
T.A.R.S. 🕚1 year ago

That man is a literal demon who would enslave the human race if you have him the power.

ડંખયાચ્યા ચોંટાવર's profile picture
ડંખયાચ્યા ચોંટાવર1 year ago

Must apply to both

Related Videos