Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Should Kalvin Phillips have been shown a second yellow? 🟨

211,596 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sky Sports Premier League
Sky Sports Premier Leaguevor 1 Jahr

Watch full video as Stephen Warnock disagrees with Dermot Gallagher on decision not to give Ipswich a penalty 👇

Profilbild von leify enjoyer
leify enjoyervor 1 Jahr

Not showing the penalty 3 seconds earlier? Corrupt.

Profilbild von David M Baxter
David M Baxtervor 1 Jahr

Yes or no it shouldn’t have been a question because a penalty should have been awarded 5 seconds prior, that’s our complaint.

Profilbild von ہ م ا ء
ہ م ا ءvor 1 Jahr

No way! Referee was too harsh, it was a fair challenge.

Profilbild von Mike Craig
Mike Craigvor 1 Jahr

Question should have been null and void - clear and obvious error to not give the penalty. (VAR - do your job!!) Phillips stays on the field therefore

Profilbild von The Cricket Stories
The Cricket Storiesvor 1 Jahr

No don't need

Profilbild von J@ck.Sp@rrowb
[email protected]@rrowbvor 1 Jahr

Amazing 🤩🤩🤩

Profilbild von MUNI YADAV (TEACHER)
MUNI YADAV (TEACHER)vor 1 Jahr

Yes, Phillips was on thin ice; could've seen red!

Profilbild von Andy Casson
Andy Cassonvor 1 Jahr

What about the blatant penalty 5 seconds before this incident?

Profilbild von ہ م ا ء
ہ م ا ءvor 1 Jahr

Yes! Clear second yellow, Phillips' discipline let him down

Ähnliche Videos