Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Should Kalvin Phillips have been shown a second yellow? 🟨

211,596 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Sky Sports Premier League's profile picture
Sky Sports Premier League1 year ago

Watch full video as Stephen Warnock disagrees with Dermot Gallagher on decision not to give Ipswich a penalty 👇

leify enjoyer's profile picture
leify enjoyer1 year ago

Not showing the penalty 3 seconds earlier? Corrupt.

David M Baxter's profile picture
David M Baxter1 year ago

Yes or no it shouldn’t have been a question because a penalty should have been awarded 5 seconds prior, that’s our complaint.

ہ م ا ء's profile picture
ہ م ا ء1 year ago

No way! Referee was too harsh, it was a fair challenge.

Mike Craig's profile picture
Mike Craig1 year ago

Question should have been null and void - clear and obvious error to not give the penalty. (VAR - do your job!!) Phillips stays on the field therefore

The Cricket Stories's profile picture
The Cricket Stories1 year ago

No don't need

J@ck.Sp@rrowb's profile picture
[email protected]@rrowb1 year ago

Amazing 🤩🤩🤩

MUNI YADAV (TEACHER)'s profile picture
MUNI YADAV (TEACHER)1 year ago

Yes, Phillips was on thin ice; could've seen red!

Andy Casson's profile picture
Andy Casson1 year ago

What about the blatant penalty 5 seconds before this incident?

ہ م ا ء's profile picture
ہ م ا ء1 year ago

Yes! Clear second yellow, Phillips' discipline let him down

Related Videos