Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Should Nottingham Forest have been given a penalty? 💭

588,364 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Nathan Richardson's profile picture
Nathan Richardson2 years ago

It’s a blatant penalty haha just say it is and say they made a mistake. Why string this lie out?

UtdLane's profile picture
UtdLane2 years ago

He’s the same guy that accepts it’s a penalty if given even if there’s just a hint of contact.. lost his credibility

Gary Chapman's profile picture
Gary Chapman2 years ago

Refs are all in it together. He'll never criticise another ref, so the whole analysis thing is pointless.

clive hagger's profile picture
clive hagger2 years ago

This segment is pointless as Dermot only ever defends the ref.

david spence's profile picture
david spence2 years ago

Time to say goodbye to Dermot.

DB's profile picture
DB2 years ago

If the ref had given it he would say it was the correct decision...😆

Ryan Lean 〓〓's profile picture
Ryan Lean 〓〓2 years ago

What is the point in bringing him on every week when all he does is agree with the referees. Waste of time

Smig 🇮🇪✊🇵🇸's profile picture
Smig 🇮🇪✊🇵🇸2 years ago

Then explain the 2 Chelsea penalties vs United in context of minimal contact and not sanitising the game How do you quantify what’s enough or not enough contact. The whole thing is a joke so they sound right even when they are wrong It’s too subjective and not the same for all

Gary Chapman's profile picture
Gary Chapman2 years ago

He kicks through him from behind, but hey, it's not a pen. 😂

Related Videos