Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Should’ve took him.

2,673,559 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Arnie 🇾🇪 ⭐⭐⭐
Arnie 🇾🇪 ⭐⭐⭐1 год назад

Maybe, but he's no Kalvin Phillips

Фото профиля 🇳🇱
🇳🇱1 год назад

He’s had all season to prove he can’t do that any more

Фото профиля scro88
scro881 год назад

Based on this one goal or 9 months of sulking and being rubbish at football?

Фото профиля Patt Myne
Patt Myne1 год назад

You’ve got to pass the ball forward for that system work.

Фото профиля 🇾🇪
🇾🇪1 год назад

💯, as poor as he’s been England have no players that can run in behind and stretch defences. Saka foden and Bellingham all basically 10s getting in each others way. Could argue saka is most like Rashford but still wants to come short for the ball.

Фото профиля Pronto
Pronto1 год назад

Absolutely. Instead he’s taken a LB who’s injured and probably won’t play a single game. And honestly I like shaw but they should’ve known that he won’t be able to shake off his injury in time.

Фото профиля 4 in a row
4 in a row1 год назад

Fuck me haven’t you see the turd play for 18 month

Фото профиля Alfie🇵🇹
Alfie🇵🇹1 год назад

Unfortunately he’s just not a Kalvin Phillips replacement

Фото профиля Andy Prince
Andy Prince1 год назад

As much as I like Bowen as a player there’s no chance he’s coming on when England need something. Rashford gives you that threat even if his form has been poor.

Фото профиля Nathan Burrows
Nathan Burrows1 год назад

Behave Jay. You’ve been hammering Rashford all season like the most of us. It was the right decision to not take him. He’s been goose for us all season. There’re a few players in that England side who shouldn’t have gone either, but we have lots of forward options.

Похожие видео

Baby We should’ve let him go
0:21

Sensitive content

Baby We should’ve let him go

Diet Coke

31,765 просмотров • 1 месяц назад