Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Shutting Down a Revised Islamic dilemma that aims at proving Torah preservation MID-Debate… Christianity’s BEST Failed To Present the argument Successfully. Yikes

TaymiApologia's profile picture

The Muslim Apologetic

1,820 subscribers

17,465 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

At an event with Frank Turek, David Wood comes on stage to explain the “Islamic dilemma,” a fascinating argument against the Quran. Worth watching.
12:42

At an event with Frank Turek, David Wood comes on stage to explain the “Islamic dilemma,” a fascinating argument against the Quran. Worth watching.

Matt Smethurst

31,715 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Alex Jones slurs and hacks during his announcement that the show is shutting down. That's a rough 52. Yikes 😬
0:55

Alex Jones slurs and hacks during his announcement that the show is shutting down. That's a rough 52. Yikes 😬

Mrs. Butters 🥧

25,454 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

During the 2026 'Change My Mind' Spring College Tour at Christopher Newport University in Newport News, VA, David Wood explains the Islamic Dilemma, an argument that exposes a foundational error in the Quran.
12:42

During the 2026 'Change My Mind' Spring College Tour at Christopher Newport University in Newport News, VA, David Wood explains the Islamic Dilemma, an argument that exposes a foundational error in the Quran.

Frank Turek

50,178 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Liberals are shutting down debate on Bill C11! This is a bill that gives the govn’t authority to control what we can see, hear and post online. Talk about censorship! And now the govn’t is shutting down debate. Censorship upon censorship! #killbillc11
2:29

The Liberals are shutting down debate on Bill C11! This is a bill that gives the govn’t authority to control what we can see, hear and post online. Talk about censorship! And now the govn’t is shutting down debate. Censorship upon censorship! #killbillc11

Rachael Thomas

357,054 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Mehdi enters the chat Shutting down m the "Israel has a right to exist" Argument 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
4:08

Mehdi enters the chat Shutting down m the "Israel has a right to exist" Argument 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

Abier

111,522 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

David Dr. David Wood, I told you that I'm not a Prophet, but I predicted exactly what you would do. David Wood, Avery, and company now after losing our debates badly, openly admit that some verses of the Qur'an contradict their authority claims in the Islamic Dilemma! Why? Because I buried them on this point and collected a lot of jizyah in their church. Notice that David is acknowledging that I AM representing their position on authority in the Islamic dilemma correctly. Have they ever admitted that there are verses in the Qur'an that say that the Torah and/or Injeel are NOT PRESERVED/ARE CORRUPTED OR NOT INSPIRED? No! Never! That's exactly why my argument has them conceding new territory that they've never done before. Now that they've admitted this, all I need to continue doing is demonstrating the hermeneutical implications by their admission because this point carries directly over into the inspiration and preservation parts of the Islamic Dilemma. Thanks Dave. You cheered me up on a difficult day for me. See the videos of David's admission below that are in agreement with his responses to my posts here:
1:43

David Dr. David Wood, I told you that I'm not a Prophet, but I predicted exactly what you would do. David Wood, Avery, and company now after losing our debates badly, openly admit that some verses of the Qur'an contradict their authority claims in the Islamic Dilemma! Why? Because I buried them on this point and collected a lot of jizyah in their church. Notice that David is acknowledging that I AM representing their position on authority in the Islamic dilemma correctly. Have they ever admitted that there are verses in the Qur'an that say that the Torah and/or Injeel are NOT PRESERVED/ARE CORRUPTED OR NOT INSPIRED? No! Never! That's exactly why my argument has them conceding new territory that they've never done before. Now that they've admitted this, all I need to continue doing is demonstrating the hermeneutical implications by their admission because this point carries directly over into the inspiration and preservation parts of the Islamic Dilemma. Thanks Dave. You cheered me up on a difficult day for me. See the videos of David's admission below that are in agreement with his responses to my posts here:

Jake Brancatella

21,065 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Right here, a Christian pastor absolutely debunks and destroys the false Islamic dilemma arguments that Christians use. Right here, Christian Apologists even your own pastors are saying the argument sucks and is not good.
1:15

Right here, a Christian pastor absolutely debunks and destroys the false Islamic dilemma arguments that Christians use. Right here, Christian Apologists even your own pastors are saying the argument sucks and is not good.

IbnHikmah

17,317 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

It's shocking to me that my argument is going over the Christian apologists' heads like a kufi. David, Avery, and others who run the "Islamic Dilemma" argument claim that the Qur'an says that the Torah is an authority for the Jews to follow, even after the Qur'an is fully revealed and preached to them. Supposedly, the Qur'an also says the Injeel is an authority for the Christians to follow, even after the Qur'an is fully revealed and preached to them. Jews and Christians are NOT required to follow the Qur'an or Islamic law for salvation, even when they are invited to do so. The Qur'an is only for Arabs, not for all of mankind. The Qur'an tells Jews to judge by the Torah, not the Qur'an! The Qur'an tells Christians to judge by the Injeel, not the Qur'an! The Torah and Injeel are also meant to be full legal authorities for the Jews and Christians respectively. They typically cite 5:43-48, 5:68, 10:94, 2:85, etc, attempting to justify their claims. These are some of their favorite verses to use in the Islamic Dilemma context. This is exactly what my authority argument is refuting. My arguments regarding the authority aspect of the Islamic Dilemma are meant to demonstrate that the Qur'an views itself as an authority, including a legal authority, over the Torah and Injeel, and over the Jews and Christians. Jews and Christians who are invited to embrace Islam and follow Islamic law must do so in order to attain salvation. If they reject following the Qur'an and Islamic law, then they will be in hellfire. If I demonstrate this is the case, then it debunks the authority aspect of the Islamic Dilemma. However, once that is granted, it demonstrates that the way these Christian apologists interpreted 5:43-48, 5:68, 2:85, 10:94, etc was wrong this entire time. It demonstrates that the verses that tell Jews and Christians to judge by the Torah and Injeel are not meant to be taken in an absolute sense. They should be understood merely in a general or partial sense. Otherwise, the only other option would be to claim that the Qur'an is internally and hopelessly contradicting itself. This means, as I explained in my debate with David, that even if I presented a verse of the Qur'an that said, "The original Torah and Injeel are corrupted and no longer authoritative" verbatim, they would just say, "The Qur'an is just contradicting itself." This is exactly what David and company do when they are being honest and pushed by my arguments. The reason why this is so important is because it demonstrates they are not reading the text of the Qur'an under a principle of charity. They cannot provide a consistent reading of the Qur'an by their own admission. According to them, some verses of the Qur'an agree with the Islamic dilemma and others disagree with it. Also, once my authority arguments are granted, by the same principle,0 we can argue that the verses they use for full inspiration and preservation don't require such readings. They could be read in a nuanced manner that is consistent with the rest of the Qur'an just like the authority verses. Why have I chosen to focus on the authority aspect, instead of inspiration or preservation? Does that mean I believe their texts are fully inspired and/or preserved? Of course not! The reason is because, if I'm being honest, the Qur'an has many more verses with greater clarity stating that the Jews and Christians are required to follow the Qur'an and Islamic law for salvation when invited to do so, then whatever it mentions about their books being textually corrupted. Also, the implications of this are massive for how we read the inspiration and preservation verses, as I've already mentioned. If Christians cannot grant this point about authority, then they certainly won't grant whatever I'd say about textual corruption from 2:79, 5:13, or anything else. I hope it's clear. It may take time for these points to sink in, but I will be beating these points like a drumbeat until there is no more jizyah to collect.
4:37

It's shocking to me that my argument is going over the Christian apologists' heads like a kufi. David, Avery, and others who run the "Islamic Dilemma" argument claim that the Qur'an says that the Torah is an authority for the Jews to follow, even after the Qur'an is fully revealed and preached to them. Supposedly, the Qur'an also says the Injeel is an authority for the Christians to follow, even after the Qur'an is fully revealed and preached to them. Jews and Christians are NOT required to follow the Qur'an or Islamic law for salvation, even when they are invited to do so. The Qur'an is only for Arabs, not for all of mankind. The Qur'an tells Jews to judge by the Torah, not the Qur'an! The Qur'an tells Christians to judge by the Injeel, not the Qur'an! The Torah and Injeel are also meant to be full legal authorities for the Jews and Christians respectively. They typically cite 5:43-48, 5:68, 10:94, 2:85, etc, attempting to justify their claims. These are some of their favorite verses to use in the Islamic Dilemma context. This is exactly what my authority argument is refuting. My arguments regarding the authority aspect of the Islamic Dilemma are meant to demonstrate that the Qur'an views itself as an authority, including a legal authority, over the Torah and Injeel, and over the Jews and Christians. Jews and Christians who are invited to embrace Islam and follow Islamic law must do so in order to attain salvation. If they reject following the Qur'an and Islamic law, then they will be in hellfire. If I demonstrate this is the case, then it debunks the authority aspect of the Islamic Dilemma. However, once that is granted, it demonstrates that the way these Christian apologists interpreted 5:43-48, 5:68, 2:85, 10:94, etc was wrong this entire time. It demonstrates that the verses that tell Jews and Christians to judge by the Torah and Injeel are not meant to be taken in an absolute sense. They should be understood merely in a general or partial sense. Otherwise, the only other option would be to claim that the Qur'an is internally and hopelessly contradicting itself. This means, as I explained in my debate with David, that even if I presented a verse of the Qur'an that said, "The original Torah and Injeel are corrupted and no longer authoritative" verbatim, they would just say, "The Qur'an is just contradicting itself." This is exactly what David and company do when they are being honest and pushed by my arguments. The reason why this is so important is because it demonstrates they are not reading the text of the Qur'an under a principle of charity. They cannot provide a consistent reading of the Qur'an by their own admission. According to them, some verses of the Qur'an agree with the Islamic dilemma and others disagree with it. Also, once my authority arguments are granted, by the same principle,0 we can argue that the verses they use for full inspiration and preservation don't require such readings. They could be read in a nuanced manner that is consistent with the rest of the Qur'an just like the authority verses. Why have I chosen to focus on the authority aspect, instead of inspiration or preservation? Does that mean I believe their texts are fully inspired and/or preserved? Of course not! The reason is because, if I'm being honest, the Qur'an has many more verses with greater clarity stating that the Jews and Christians are required to follow the Qur'an and Islamic law for salvation when invited to do so, then whatever it mentions about their books being textually corrupted. Also, the implications of this are massive for how we read the inspiration and preservation verses, as I've already mentioned. If Christians cannot grant this point about authority, then they certainly won't grant whatever I'd say about textual corruption from 2:79, 5:13, or anything else. I hope it's clear. It may take time for these points to sink in, but I will be beating these points like a drumbeat until there is no more jizyah to collect.

Jake Brancatella

39,152 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

At we’re building a foundational protein machine learning model that aims to understand everything about macromolecules. We can successfully create a zinc binding site without ever specifying the positions or geometries to the model.
0:24

At we’re building a foundational protein machine learning model that aims to understand everything about macromolecules. We can successfully create a zinc binding site without ever specifying the positions or geometries to the model.

Kathy Y. Wei, Ph.D.

32,257 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Both Republican and Democratic proposals that would have funded the government past Tuesday failed in the Senate during the eleventh hour, effectively shutting down the government at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday.
12:26

Both Republican and Democratic proposals that would have funded the government past Tuesday failed in the Senate during the eleventh hour, effectively shutting down the government at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday.

ABC News

31,385 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Ever since, Jamaat has failed to present a single credible piece of evidence proving its allegations that Sheikh Hasina gave anything to India. Even to this day, there is still no evidence. #BDResists
0:33

Ever since, Jamaat has failed to present a single credible piece of evidence proving its allegations that Sheikh Hasina gave anything to India. Even to this day, there is still no evidence. #BDResists

AA Faisal

11,138 просмотров • 26 дней назад

The Talmud says that "demons are extra present at crowder Torah gatherings" and it instructs jews to "curse the graves of Gentiles whenever they pass them and their mothers"
1:08

The Talmud says that "demons are extra present at crowder Torah gatherings" and it instructs jews to "curse the graves of Gentiles whenever they pass them and their mothers"

Fight Back Podcast

25,359 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨Interview - After a member of Ali Dawah's and Orthodox Muslims' team assaulted a Christian evangelist. After a group of Christian evangelists attempted to debate Ali Dawah, a member of their team allegedly punched Chris At Speaker's Corner simply for asking questions about the Islamic dilemma.
2:55

🚨Interview - After a member of Ali Dawah's and Orthodox Muslims' team assaulted a Christian evangelist. After a group of Christian evangelists attempted to debate Ali Dawah, a member of their team allegedly punched Chris At Speaker's Corner simply for asking questions about the Islamic dilemma.

Young Bob

26,480 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

It's funny how Muslims will cope and cry about us using the Islamic Dilemma, but when they're confronted with a religion coming after Islam claiming to confirm the Quran but contradicting it, they use OUR argument 😂😂😂
1:50

It's funny how Muslims will cope and cry about us using the Islamic Dilemma, but when they're confronted with a religion coming after Islam claiming to confirm the Quran but contradicting it, they use OUR argument 😂😂😂

GodLogic_GL

363,753 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Tucker Carlson criticized Ben Shapiro tonight for aggressively shutting down a question about the USS Liberty. Here is Charlie Kirk shutting down a similar question. “Do not peddle conspiracy theories at our event. That is not acceptable. Do not say that.”
1:28

Tucker Carlson criticized Ben Shapiro tonight for aggressively shutting down a question about the USS Liberty. Here is Charlie Kirk shutting down a similar question. “Do not peddle conspiracy theories at our event. That is not acceptable. Do not say that.”

Kassy Akiva

523,193 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A white girl slapped a black guy mid-argument at school….situation escalated fast after he dropped, didn’t expect him to f!ght back like that
0:24

A white girl slapped a black guy mid-argument at school….situation escalated fast after he dropped, didn’t expect him to f!ght back like that

☆

22,119 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

$TSLA Breakdown confirmed Tesla didn’t just break down it attempted to reclaim support and failed. That rejection signals weakness. Mid term looks rough, but the lower it goes, the better the opportunity for those looking to long it at the right time.
4:46

$TSLA Breakdown confirmed Tesla didn’t just break down it attempted to reclaim support and failed. That rejection signals weakness. Mid term looks rough, but the lower it goes, the better the opportunity for those looking to long it at the right time.

The Swing Trader

40,876 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The so-called Cyrus Accord aims to ensure that a future Iran—should the Islamic Republic be toppled—would be a servant of Israel, says Ammar Kazmi 🇵🇸.
1:38

The so-called Cyrus Accord aims to ensure that a future Iran—should the Islamic Republic be toppled—would be a servant of Israel, says Ammar Kazmi 🇵🇸.

Palestine Declassified

10,659 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад