Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

side by side Groq vs. GPT-3.5, completely different user experience, a game changer for products that require low latency

103,482 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Harsh Gupta
Harsh Guptavor 2 Jahren

Can be a game changer in the voice interaction products. Last time I checked vocode, vapi and other voice interaction production were adding filler words to deal with high latency.

Profilbild von John Rush
John Rushvor 2 Jahren

Feels like when i switched from EDGE to 3G on my phone 20 years ago

Profilbild von boon
boonvor 2 Jahren

LPUs for the win 🥇

Profilbild von Umang Jaipuria
Umang Jaipuriavor 2 Jahren

low latency is a universal need!

Profilbild von Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign
Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesignvor 2 Jahren

I tried it out. Sure the answer is very fast, but you need to mention, that you need to wait until your request is started, because you land in a queue. I waited in my first try 14 Seconds for the answer.

Profilbild von Miki Ovshievich
Miki Ovshievichvor 2 Jahren

How's the quality diff?

Profilbild von biendltb
biendltbvor 2 Jahren

The side-by-side comparison is visually misleading. The two runs are technically different in terms of model sizes, connections, response display. Groq should be compared against an NVIDIA GPU chip, not to compare with an application like GPT-3.5

Profilbild von Hong
Hongvor 2 Jahren

@HPC_Guru Laser vs Dot matrix printer

Profilbild von Jack
Jackvor 2 Jahren

we're at the dawn of Language Processing Units applications

Profilbild von Nick
Nickvor 2 Jahren

Now do a cost per token comparison

Ähnliche Videos