Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

side by side Groq vs. GPT-3.5, completely different user experience, a game changer for products that require low latency

103,482 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Harsh Gupta's profile picture
Harsh Gupta2 years ago

Can be a game changer in the voice interaction products. Last time I checked vocode, vapi and other voice interaction production were adding filler words to deal with high latency.

John Rush's profile picture
John Rush2 years ago

Feels like when i switched from EDGE to 3G on my phone 20 years ago

boon's profile picture
boon2 years ago

LPUs for the win 🥇

Umang Jaipuria's profile picture
Umang Jaipuria2 years ago

low latency is a universal need!

Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign's profile picture
Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign2 years ago

I tried it out. Sure the answer is very fast, but you need to mention, that you need to wait until your request is started, because you land in a queue. I waited in my first try 14 Seconds for the answer.

Miki Ovshievich's profile picture
Miki Ovshievich2 years ago

How's the quality diff?

biendltb's profile picture
biendltb2 years ago

The side-by-side comparison is visually misleading. The two runs are technically different in terms of model sizes, connections, response display. Groq should be compared against an NVIDIA GPU chip, not to compare with an application like GPT-3.5

Hong's profile picture
Hong2 years ago

@HPC_Guru Laser vs Dot matrix printer

Jack's profile picture
Jack2 years ago

we're at the dawn of Language Processing Units applications

Nick's profile picture
Nick2 years ago

Now do a cost per token comparison

Related Videos