Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

side by side Groq vs. GPT-3.5, completely different user experience, a game changer for products that require low latency

103,482 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Harsh Gupta
Harsh Gupta2 лет назад

Can be a game changer in the voice interaction products. Last time I checked vocode, vapi and other voice interaction production were adding filler words to deal with high latency.

Фото профиля John Rush
John Rush2 лет назад

Feels like when i switched from EDGE to 3G on my phone 20 years ago

Фото профиля boon
boon2 лет назад

LPUs for the win 🥇

Фото профиля Umang Jaipuria
Umang Jaipuria2 лет назад

low latency is a universal need!

Фото профиля Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign
Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign2 лет назад

I tried it out. Sure the answer is very fast, but you need to mention, that you need to wait until your request is started, because you land in a queue. I waited in my first try 14 Seconds for the answer.

Фото профиля Miki Ovshievich
Miki Ovshievich2 лет назад

How's the quality diff?

Фото профиля biendltb
biendltb2 лет назад

The side-by-side comparison is visually misleading. The two runs are technically different in terms of model sizes, connections, response display. Groq should be compared against an NVIDIA GPU chip, not to compare with an application like GPT-3.5

Фото профиля Hong
Hong2 лет назад

@HPC_Guru Laser vs Dot matrix printer

Фото профиля Jack
Jack2 лет назад

we're at the dawn of Language Processing Units applications

Фото профиля Nick
Nick2 лет назад

Now do a cost per token comparison

Похожие видео