Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

side by side Groq vs. GPT-3.5, completely different user experience, a game changer for products that require low latency

103,482 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Harsh Gupta profil fotoğrafı
Harsh Gupta2 yıl önce

Can be a game changer in the voice interaction products. Last time I checked vocode, vapi and other voice interaction production were adding filler words to deal with high latency.

John Rush profil fotoğrafı
John Rush2 yıl önce

Feels like when i switched from EDGE to 3G on my phone 20 years ago

boon profil fotoğrafı
boon2 yıl önce

LPUs for the win 🥇

Umang Jaipuria profil fotoğrafı
Umang Jaipuria2 yıl önce

low latency is a universal need!

Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign profil fotoğrafı
Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign2 yıl önce

I tried it out. Sure the answer is very fast, but you need to mention, that you need to wait until your request is started, because you land in a queue. I waited in my first try 14 Seconds for the answer.

Miki Ovshievich profil fotoğrafı
Miki Ovshievich2 yıl önce

How's the quality diff?

biendltb profil fotoğrafı
biendltb2 yıl önce

The side-by-side comparison is visually misleading. The two runs are technically different in terms of model sizes, connections, response display. Groq should be compared against an NVIDIA GPU chip, not to compare with an application like GPT-3.5

Hong profil fotoğrafı
Hong2 yıl önce

@HPC_Guru Laser vs Dot matrix printer

Jack profil fotoğrafı
Jack2 yıl önce

we're at the dawn of Language Processing Units applications

Nick profil fotoğrafı
Nick2 yıl önce

Now do a cost per token comparison

Benzer Videolar