正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

side by side Groq vs. GPT-3.5, completely different user experience, a game changer for products that require low latency

103,482 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Harsh Gupta 的头像
Harsh Gupta2 年前

Can be a game changer in the voice interaction products. Last time I checked vocode, vapi and other voice interaction production were adding filler words to deal with high latency.

John Rush 的头像
John Rush2 年前

Feels like when i switched from EDGE to 3G on my phone 20 years ago

boon 的头像
boon2 年前

LPUs for the win 🥇

Umang Jaipuria 的头像
Umang Jaipuria2 年前

low latency is a universal need!

Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign 的头像
Andreas Lang - Sphinx-Flashdesign2 年前

I tried it out. Sure the answer is very fast, but you need to mention, that you need to wait until your request is started, because you land in a queue. I waited in my first try 14 Seconds for the answer.

Miki Ovshievich 的头像
Miki Ovshievich2 年前

How's the quality diff?

biendltb 的头像
biendltb2 年前

The side-by-side comparison is visually misleading. The two runs are technically different in terms of model sizes, connections, response display. Groq should be compared against an NVIDIA GPU chip, not to compare with an application like GPT-3.5

Hong 的头像
Hong2 年前

@HPC_Guru Laser vs Dot matrix printer

Jack 的头像
Jack2 年前

we're at the dawn of Language Processing Units applications

Nick 的头像
Nick2 年前

Now do a cost per token comparison

相关视频