Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Signs you should marry her: her butthole is completely destroyed Isabella_uzcategui Extreme Girls #RT #Follow #anal #prolapse #pussy #cervix #camgirl #livestream #porn #slut #whore #rosebud #fisting #extremegirls

_extreme_girls_'s profile picture

Extreme Girls

24,513 subscribers

49,566 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#RT#Follow#anal#prolapse#pussy#cervix#camgirl#livestream#porn#slut#whore#rosebud#fisting#extremegirls
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 FOLLOW-UP BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Releases Video "Proof of Life" After Marathon 4.5-Hour Meeting with Erika Kirk! 🎥🤝 Candace Owens just dropped this exhausted but optimistic update: “Four and a half hours later, I'm alive... very productive conversation. I asked EVERY single question – from Egyptian planes to Turning Point USA faith. I was very surprised by some of the answers... and they were surprised by the intel I shared.” She says it “probably should have happened a long time ago” and calls it “a very big step in the right direction.” Full explosive rundown coming TOMORROW on her livestream – nothing held back! The thaw is real, folks. Agreements on more than expected, surprises on both sides, and now closer to the same goals. Is the rift finally healing? Or are bigger revelations dropping tomorrow? 👀 Set your reminders – you DO NOT want to miss this! ⏰ RT like crazy! Tomorrow’s livestream could be the most watched broadcast of the year. Buckle up! 🚀
0:45

🚨 FOLLOW-UP BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Releases Video "Proof of Life" After Marathon 4.5-Hour Meeting with Erika Kirk! 🎥🤝 Candace Owens just dropped this exhausted but optimistic update: “Four and a half hours later, I'm alive... very productive conversation. I asked EVERY single question – from Egyptian planes to Turning Point USA faith. I was very surprised by some of the answers... and they were surprised by the intel I shared.” She says it “probably should have happened a long time ago” and calls it “a very big step in the right direction.” Full explosive rundown coming TOMORROW on her livestream – nothing held back! The thaw is real, folks. Agreements on more than expected, surprises on both sides, and now closer to the same goals. Is the rift finally healing? Or are bigger revelations dropping tomorrow? 👀 Set your reminders – you DO NOT want to miss this! ⏰ RT like crazy! Tomorrow’s livestream could be the most watched broadcast of the year. Buckle up! 🚀

Project Constitution

689,871 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

In February 2025, Tranyelle Harshman, a Wyoming mother of four with no history of violence, shot her four daughters and then took her own life. Her family describes an event completely out of character for a loving mother. In this video I examine what her medical care looked like in the months before, because according to the wrongful death lawsuit her mother has now filed, that care centered on take-home ketamine for postpartum depression. If you followed my coverage of the Lindsay Clancy case, the pattern here will be painfully familiar. According to the lawsuit and public reporting, Tranyelle sought help for postpartum depression in late 2024 and was prescribed ketamine lozenges to take at home. I want to explain why that detail matters. Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic. In most settings it is administered under clinical supervision precisely because it can cause psychiatric disturbances, dissociation, hallucinations, and dangerous blood pressure spikes. Tranyelle reportedly experienced heart palpitations, trouble focusing, and a sense of disconnection from reality, and reported this to her provider. The response, according to the complaint, was that these reactions were common, and her dose was increased. On February 10, after taking that increased dose, the unthinkable happened. Toxicology reportedly showed a blood ketamine level four times the threshold associated with mind-altering effects and physical impairment. The clinic and provider deny wrongdoing and say the treatment followed the standard of care. A court will decide that question, and I am careful in this video to separate what is alleged from what is established. But the clinical lesson does not need to wait for a verdict, because it is the same lesson from the Clancy case: when a patient reports getting worse on a psychiatric drug, the answer is never to double down. An adverse reaction is information. Raising the dose into it is how tragedies are built. I also talk about what should surround any mother struggling after childbirth: family involved in her care, providers who listen when she says something feels wrong, and real attention to the fundamentals before and alongside any medication, not medication alone at home with no one watching. Four little girls deserved a system that treated their mother's warning signs as warnings.
11:31

In February 2025, Tranyelle Harshman, a Wyoming mother of four with no history of violence, shot her four daughters and then took her own life. Her family describes an event completely out of character for a loving mother. In this video I examine what her medical care looked like in the months before, because according to the wrongful death lawsuit her mother has now filed, that care centered on take-home ketamine for postpartum depression. If you followed my coverage of the Lindsay Clancy case, the pattern here will be painfully familiar. According to the lawsuit and public reporting, Tranyelle sought help for postpartum depression in late 2024 and was prescribed ketamine lozenges to take at home. I want to explain why that detail matters. Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic. In most settings it is administered under clinical supervision precisely because it can cause psychiatric disturbances, dissociation, hallucinations, and dangerous blood pressure spikes. Tranyelle reportedly experienced heart palpitations, trouble focusing, and a sense of disconnection from reality, and reported this to her provider. The response, according to the complaint, was that these reactions were common, and her dose was increased. On February 10, after taking that increased dose, the unthinkable happened. Toxicology reportedly showed a blood ketamine level four times the threshold associated with mind-altering effects and physical impairment. The clinic and provider deny wrongdoing and say the treatment followed the standard of care. A court will decide that question, and I am careful in this video to separate what is alleged from what is established. But the clinical lesson does not need to wait for a verdict, because it is the same lesson from the Clancy case: when a patient reports getting worse on a psychiatric drug, the answer is never to double down. An adverse reaction is information. Raising the dose into it is how tragedies are built. I also talk about what should surround any mother struggling after childbirth: family involved in her care, providers who listen when she says something feels wrong, and real attention to the fundamentals before and alongside any medication, not medication alone at home with no one watching. Four little girls deserved a system that treated their mother's warning signs as warnings.

Dr. Josef

114,370 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 EXPOSED: WHISTLEBLOWER Exposes Ben Shapiro & Daily Wire's Sick REVENGE PLOT Against Candace Owens – "Attack Candace or NO Show!" 😱 On tonight's podcast, Candace drops a BOMBSHELL: A brave whistleblower (Maggie Wegner) contacted her with PROOF that Daily Wire was desperately casting young talent—BUT with one twisted condition: You ONLY get the gig if you're willing to viciously MOCK and ATTACK Candace Owens on camera. Maggie was sent a script designed to trash Candace. She sat down to film... but REFUSED. Texted them: "It doesn't feel true to what I really believe... I may not be the right fit for this one." Their response? Ice cold. No more opportunities. Merry Christmas. 😒 Candace: "They wanted pawns to do their dirty work. It's cowardice. Ben Shapiro is obsessed—he can't let me go because I broke free from their control." This isn't business—it's SADISTIC revenge for Candace being a bad SLAVE by daring to think independently and escaping the "slave chains," without being completely destroyed and then on to build her own empire despite his meddling. Maggie Wegner (Maggie Wegner) is a HERO for saying NO. Candace hopes she hits 3 MILLION followers overnight—let's make it happen! Daily Wire's mask is OFF: They don't want talent—they want obedient attack dogs. Ben, if you hate Candace this much,naybe you need to see a therapist because what you're doing is not right sand giving off major STALKER vibes. Stop hiding behind scripted smears and leave her alone. Tag Ben Shapiro Candace Owens & RT to support real courage! Follow Maggie Wegner NOW!
3:17

🚨 EXPOSED: WHISTLEBLOWER Exposes Ben Shapiro & Daily Wire's Sick REVENGE PLOT Against Candace Owens – "Attack Candace or NO Show!" 😱 On tonight's podcast, Candace drops a BOMBSHELL: A brave whistleblower (Maggie Wegner) contacted her with PROOF that Daily Wire was desperately casting young talent—BUT with one twisted condition: You ONLY get the gig if you're willing to viciously MOCK and ATTACK Candace Owens on camera. Maggie was sent a script designed to trash Candace. She sat down to film... but REFUSED. Texted them: "It doesn't feel true to what I really believe... I may not be the right fit for this one." Their response? Ice cold. No more opportunities. Merry Christmas. 😒 Candace: "They wanted pawns to do their dirty work. It's cowardice. Ben Shapiro is obsessed—he can't let me go because I broke free from their control." This isn't business—it's SADISTIC revenge for Candace being a bad SLAVE by daring to think independently and escaping the "slave chains," without being completely destroyed and then on to build her own empire despite his meddling. Maggie Wegner (Maggie Wegner) is a HERO for saying NO. Candace hopes she hits 3 MILLION followers overnight—let's make it happen! Daily Wire's mask is OFF: They don't want talent—they want obedient attack dogs. Ben, if you hate Candace this much,naybe you need to see a therapist because what you're doing is not right sand giving off major STALKER vibes. Stop hiding behind scripted smears and leave her alone. Tag Ben Shapiro Candace Owens & RT to support real courage! Follow Maggie Wegner NOW!

Project Constitution

75,494 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

‼️Candace Owens Just Destroyed Erika Kirk’s WEAK Response to Being HECKLED at the Women’s Leadership Summit! 👀 During her speech, Erika Kirk was heckled by someone who yelled that she “protects pedophiles.” Instead of addressing it head-on like Charlie Kirk would have, Erika gave a soft, scripted response about how “happiness comes and goes” and that she hopes the person finds happiness. Candace Owens called it out for exactly what it was — weak, inauthentic, and completely out of touch with how Turning Point used to operate. She pointed out that Charlie would have invited the person to the front to debate, not hidden behind passive-aggressive “bless your heart” energy. Candace didn’t stop there. She highlighted the pattern of Erika partnering with people and organizations that have serious allegations surrounding trafficking and abuse, including connections to Harvest Church and Greg Laurie. She noted that almost everyone in Erika’s inner circle seems to have these kinds of shady ties, yet Erika refuses to answer any questions about it. Instead, she just shows up, quotes Bible verses, and acts like the position is hers by default because it was her husband’s. This is the new Turning Point. And people are seeing right through it. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️My channel is under attack to try to bankrupt me. If you want to support me and help me keep exposing these clowns Donate here:🔗
3:26

‼️Candace Owens Just Destroyed Erika Kirk’s WEAK Response to Being HECKLED at the Women’s Leadership Summit! 👀 During her speech, Erika Kirk was heckled by someone who yelled that she “protects pedophiles.” Instead of addressing it head-on like Charlie Kirk would have, Erika gave a soft, scripted response about how “happiness comes and goes” and that she hopes the person finds happiness. Candace Owens called it out for exactly what it was — weak, inauthentic, and completely out of touch with how Turning Point used to operate. She pointed out that Charlie would have invited the person to the front to debate, not hidden behind passive-aggressive “bless your heart” energy. Candace didn’t stop there. She highlighted the pattern of Erika partnering with people and organizations that have serious allegations surrounding trafficking and abuse, including connections to Harvest Church and Greg Laurie. She noted that almost everyone in Erika’s inner circle seems to have these kinds of shady ties, yet Erika refuses to answer any questions about it. Instead, she just shows up, quotes Bible verses, and acts like the position is hers by default because it was her husband’s. This is the new Turning Point. And people are seeing right through it. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️My channel is under attack to try to bankrupt me. If you want to support me and help me keep exposing these clowns Donate here:🔗

Project Constitution

43,821 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

‼️Two Weeks Before Charlie Was Killed, Erika And Kolvet Got On A Call With A Murder-Mystery Studio August 28, 2025. Charlie is still alive. Erika is still the doting Christian wife selling Proclaim 365 and telling girls to marry young. Andrew Kolvet, people who worked with him say, is not supposed to be running her personal media outside Turning Point Faith. Then they get on a conference call with Empress Films. On the line: founder Emma Cooper, LA EP Eben Davidson out of Paramount, and two producers Candace is not naming yet. Empress is not a church-media shop. Their beat is unsolved death. First promo out the door was Ghislaine Maxwell: Epstein’s Shadow. Then Marilyn’s “unheard tapes” that land on the official story. Who Killed Jill Dando? — BBC presenter shot on her doorstep, Savile and Yugoslavia theories attached. Who Killed Diana? already announced. Depp v Heard. Gilgo Beach. Murder mystery is the product. Cooper came off Pulse and Madeleine McCann. That is the company. So what was the call about. A clothing line? A faith tour? Candace is asking the only question that matters: what documentary were they working on thirteen days before UVU, and why was Charlie’s wife and his PR guy on the phone with a left-leaning London true-crime house that specializes in dead famous people. Parents in Idaho can fight over assemblies. This date does not belong on a merch calendar. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. ⚠️As you guys know this is now day 10 of no monetization. They’ve targeted the income of everyone digging into the Charlie case. Now more than ever we rely on the support of our community to keep the Charlie Kirk investigation alive. If you value our work and want to support us, you can click the link in the post to donate to our fundraiser. 👇
10:11

‼️Two Weeks Before Charlie Was Killed, Erika And Kolvet Got On A Call With A Murder-Mystery Studio August 28, 2025. Charlie is still alive. Erika is still the doting Christian wife selling Proclaim 365 and telling girls to marry young. Andrew Kolvet, people who worked with him say, is not supposed to be running her personal media outside Turning Point Faith. Then they get on a conference call with Empress Films. On the line: founder Emma Cooper, LA EP Eben Davidson out of Paramount, and two producers Candace is not naming yet. Empress is not a church-media shop. Their beat is unsolved death. First promo out the door was Ghislaine Maxwell: Epstein’s Shadow. Then Marilyn’s “unheard tapes” that land on the official story. Who Killed Jill Dando? — BBC presenter shot on her doorstep, Savile and Yugoslavia theories attached. Who Killed Diana? already announced. Depp v Heard. Gilgo Beach. Murder mystery is the product. Cooper came off Pulse and Madeleine McCann. That is the company. So what was the call about. A clothing line? A faith tour? Candace is asking the only question that matters: what documentary were they working on thirteen days before UVU, and why was Charlie’s wife and his PR guy on the phone with a left-leaning London true-crime house that specializes in dead famous people. Parents in Idaho can fight over assemblies. This date does not belong on a merch calendar. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. ⚠️As you guys know this is now day 10 of no monetization. They’ve targeted the income of everyone digging into the Charlie case. Now more than ever we rely on the support of our community to keep the Charlie Kirk investigation alive. If you value our work and want to support us, you can click the link in the post to donate to our fundraiser. 👇

Project Constitution

45,008 просмотров • 5 дней назад

🚨 EXPOSED: Tracey Martin GROOMING Teens Under Guise of "EMPOWERMENT – Now Her OWN Daughter's Are The Victims! ~Part 1 BOMBSHELL You came at me in your video, Tracey, calling me "wrong" for exposing Erika Kirk as a groomer who preyed on YOUR OWN DAUGHTER—now her "personal assistant." Newsflash: My research is ROCK SOLID, backed by sources you can't touch. But guess what? I've dug DEEP into YOU now, and it's time to clap back. You're no innocent bystander—you're part of the same twisted pattern. Let's break it down. 🔥 First off, your "business" TLM Coaching and Media (hiding behind @genzawaken on IG) straight-up TARGETS MINORS as young as 16. Your own post brags about expanding to "ALL of Gen Z, ages 16-26" and recruiting them for "life coaching" on communication, boundaries, relationships, mental health, college transitions, and more. Sound familiar? It's the EXACT same playbook I called out Erika for: luring vulnerable, impressionable teens "under your wing" under the guise of empowerment. But we all know what that really means—exploitation. 😡 You get these kids modeling for your brands in RISQUÉ outfits, showing way too much skin to "promote" your stuff. Attached pics show the proof: half-naked poses, barely-there wraps, desert shoots that leave NOTHING to the imagination. This isn't "fashion"—it's predatory. And the pattern? Erika was GROOMED by YOU from a young age (those raunchy old photos of her posing for you say it all). Erika in turn did the same thing to multiple girls, INCLUDING YOUR DAUGHTER. Sick cycle, right? But here's where it gets REALLY twisted: You FORCED your own daughter to model PRACTICALLY NAKED, covered only by a towel or wrap, exposing her in ways no mom should. (See attached—it's horrifying.) And don't get me started on that cruel Nordstrom shoot: Your daughter has a medical condition affecting her hair growth, and you made her pose BALD next to mannequins. She's CLEARLY looking down in clear horror and discomfort. What kind of sadistic "parenting" is that? Mortifying and abusive. 🤮 Oh, and your TLM profile? You make a BIG DEAL about being "33 years friends" with your husband before marriage. 33? That's straight Masonic code—your family's lineage is DEEP in Freemasonry, flashing that number like a gang sign. Subtle, but we see it. Add in the vibes between you and Erika: Your back-and-forth screams more than "friends." Both of you come off as bisexual, with past interactions hinting at a lesbian dynamic. Is that the real bond here? Grooming each other, then the kids? This is PART 1, folks. Tracey wanted smoke by coming after me—now she's getting the full blaze. Stay tuned for PART 2: The DOZEN+ shell LLCs she and her hubby run, their shady real estate deals, her families DEEP military ties, and family lineage back to German "scientists" (psychologists, as Candace Owens hinted). It's all connecting. Tag Candace Owens and RT if you're done with these predators targeting out kids hiding behind "coaching" and "empowerment." Why do they all feel the need to take up childrens causes. Is it because they all really want to save the children? Or could it be that they are all satanic Baal worshipers who sacrifice children for sport. You be the judge. It's time protect the kids and expose these people who prey on them.💥 Special Thanks to MIA, The Best Researcher In The West. FOLLOW Her!
4:38

Sensitive content

🚨 EXPOSED: Tracey Martin GROOMING Teens Under Guise of "EMPOWERMENT – Now Her OWN Daughter's Are The Victims! ~Part 1 BOMBSHELL You came at me in your video, Tracey, calling me "wrong" for exposing Erika Kirk as a groomer who preyed on YOUR OWN DAUGHTER—now her "personal assistant." Newsflash: My research is ROCK SOLID, backed by sources you can't touch. But guess what? I've dug DEEP into YOU now, and it's time to clap back. You're no innocent bystander—you're part of the same twisted pattern. Let's break it down. 🔥 First off, your "business" TLM Coaching and Media (hiding behind @genzawaken on IG) straight-up TARGETS MINORS as young as 16. Your own post brags about expanding to "ALL of Gen Z, ages 16-26" and recruiting them for "life coaching" on communication, boundaries, relationships, mental health, college transitions, and more. Sound familiar? It's the EXACT same playbook I called out Erika for: luring vulnerable, impressionable teens "under your wing" under the guise of empowerment. But we all know what that really means—exploitation. 😡 You get these kids modeling for your brands in RISQUÉ outfits, showing way too much skin to "promote" your stuff. Attached pics show the proof: half-naked poses, barely-there wraps, desert shoots that leave NOTHING to the imagination. This isn't "fashion"—it's predatory. And the pattern? Erika was GROOMED by YOU from a young age (those raunchy old photos of her posing for you say it all). Erika in turn did the same thing to multiple girls, INCLUDING YOUR DAUGHTER. Sick cycle, right? But here's where it gets REALLY twisted: You FORCED your own daughter to model PRACTICALLY NAKED, covered only by a towel or wrap, exposing her in ways no mom should. (See attached—it's horrifying.) And don't get me started on that cruel Nordstrom shoot: Your daughter has a medical condition affecting her hair growth, and you made her pose BALD next to mannequins. She's CLEARLY looking down in clear horror and discomfort. What kind of sadistic "parenting" is that? Mortifying and abusive. 🤮 Oh, and your TLM profile? You make a BIG DEAL about being "33 years friends" with your husband before marriage. 33? That's straight Masonic code—your family's lineage is DEEP in Freemasonry, flashing that number like a gang sign. Subtle, but we see it. Add in the vibes between you and Erika: Your back-and-forth screams more than "friends." Both of you come off as bisexual, with past interactions hinting at a lesbian dynamic. Is that the real bond here? Grooming each other, then the kids? This is PART 1, folks. Tracey wanted smoke by coming after me—now she's getting the full blaze. Stay tuned for PART 2: The DOZEN+ shell LLCs she and her hubby run, their shady real estate deals, her families DEEP military ties, and family lineage back to German "scientists" (psychologists, as Candace Owens hinted). It's all connecting. Tag Candace Owens and RT if you're done with these predators targeting out kids hiding behind "coaching" and "empowerment." Why do they all feel the need to take up childrens causes. Is it because they all really want to save the children? Or could it be that they are all satanic Baal worshipers who sacrifice children for sport. You be the judge. It's time protect the kids and expose these people who prey on them.💥 Special Thanks to MIA, The Best Researcher In The West. FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

80,064 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I was getting married in May. Then I discovered my fiancé had been hiding our engagement from his late wife’s family. I thought he was protecting them from painful news. I was wrong. I’m 25, and my fiancé is 29. We were supposed to get married in May. He had been married once before, when he was only 20. His wife was his high school sweetheart. She died at 22 from sepsis after a surgery went horribly wrong. I knew about her from the beginning. What I didn’t realize was how deeply her family was still involved in my fiancé’s life. He remained extremely close to her father and her two sisters. Every year, he spent important dates with them: Her birthday. Their wedding anniversary. The anniversary of her death. At first, I hated it. But I tried to understand. She wasn't an ex he had simply broken up with. She was someone he had loved, married, and then lost. So I gave him space. Eventually, I stopped feeling threatened by his relationship with her family. Then, last year, he proposed. I said yes. I thought we were finally building our own future. Then I discovered something that completely changed the way I saw everything. He had never told her family that we were engaged. Not her father. Not her sisters. Nobody. I couldn't understand why. Then one afternoon, I went to a local coffee shop. The youngest sister worked there. She noticed my engagement ring. Her expression changed immediately. She stared at my hand. Then she looked at me. And within seconds, she was messaging my fiancé. I left the coffee shop confused. A week later, things became terrifying. My car was vandalized. This wasn't random damage. Red paint had been thrown across it. Someone had written: "WHORE." And: "GRAVE ROBBER." My tires were slashed. My windows were cracked. I'd spent an entire year saving for that car. Then we found out who had done it. The car belonged to my fiancé's late wife's youngest sister. My fiancé tried to fix everything. He arranged a meeting between me and the family. I thought maybe we could finally talk. We couldn't. The moment we sat down, the accusations started. They told me he never truly loved his late wife. They said I was replacing her. They acted as if my engagement was some kind of betrayal. Then the youngest sister started sending me messages. They weren't just angry. They were cruel. She attacked my appearance. My character. My worth. She called me things I can't even bring myself to repeat. And then I looked across the table at my fiancé. He was breaking down. Watching him cry made something inside me snap. Because suddenly, I wasn't sure whether I was fighting for my relationship... or fighting against a family that would never allow him to move forward. So I gave him one choice. Cut contact with them completely—or we call off the wedding. He stared at me. And for the first time since we got engaged, I wondered if I had actually been wrong to say yes. Because how do you marry someone when part of their life still belongs to a dead marriage? And how far should you go to protect the family you're trying to build? Would you give the ultimatum or walk away?
5:13

I was getting married in May. Then I discovered my fiancé had been hiding our engagement from his late wife’s family. I thought he was protecting them from painful news. I was wrong. I’m 25, and my fiancé is 29. We were supposed to get married in May. He had been married once before, when he was only 20. His wife was his high school sweetheart. She died at 22 from sepsis after a surgery went horribly wrong. I knew about her from the beginning. What I didn’t realize was how deeply her family was still involved in my fiancé’s life. He remained extremely close to her father and her two sisters. Every year, he spent important dates with them: Her birthday. Their wedding anniversary. The anniversary of her death. At first, I hated it. But I tried to understand. She wasn't an ex he had simply broken up with. She was someone he had loved, married, and then lost. So I gave him space. Eventually, I stopped feeling threatened by his relationship with her family. Then, last year, he proposed. I said yes. I thought we were finally building our own future. Then I discovered something that completely changed the way I saw everything. He had never told her family that we were engaged. Not her father. Not her sisters. Nobody. I couldn't understand why. Then one afternoon, I went to a local coffee shop. The youngest sister worked there. She noticed my engagement ring. Her expression changed immediately. She stared at my hand. Then she looked at me. And within seconds, she was messaging my fiancé. I left the coffee shop confused. A week later, things became terrifying. My car was vandalized. This wasn't random damage. Red paint had been thrown across it. Someone had written: "WHORE." And: "GRAVE ROBBER." My tires were slashed. My windows were cracked. I'd spent an entire year saving for that car. Then we found out who had done it. The car belonged to my fiancé's late wife's youngest sister. My fiancé tried to fix everything. He arranged a meeting between me and the family. I thought maybe we could finally talk. We couldn't. The moment we sat down, the accusations started. They told me he never truly loved his late wife. They said I was replacing her. They acted as if my engagement was some kind of betrayal. Then the youngest sister started sending me messages. They weren't just angry. They were cruel. She attacked my appearance. My character. My worth. She called me things I can't even bring myself to repeat. And then I looked across the table at my fiancé. He was breaking down. Watching him cry made something inside me snap. Because suddenly, I wasn't sure whether I was fighting for my relationship... or fighting against a family that would never allow him to move forward. So I gave him one choice. Cut contact with them completely—or we call off the wedding. He stared at me. And for the first time since we got engaged, I wondered if I had actually been wrong to say yes. Because how do you marry someone when part of their life still belongs to a dead marriage? And how far should you go to protect the family you're trying to build? Would you give the ultimatum or walk away?

👑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆

11,346 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BOMBSHELL: TPUSA Forced to CANCEL Erika Kirk Speaking Events Over MASSIVE Backlash – Erika's DOWNFALL Has Begun‼️☠️ Breaking from tonight's Candace Owens podcast—She's got INSIDER SCOOP: Turning Point USA FORCED to CANCEL multiple events with Erika Kirk as speaker due to OVERWHELMING OUTRAGE from Charlie's true supporters! We see through the SHADY BS: Missing millions & alleged fraud, paranoid mass firings of employees leaking to Candace, platforming Charlie's ENEMIES like Ben Shapiro, cozy interviews with NYT & CBS (Bari Weiss), and sucking up the same Zionist billionaire cash that Charlie REJECTED! Candace nails it: "I Have it on very good authority that they have had to cancel events that Erica was intended to speak at. Because there has been a backlash... and there SHOULD be a backlash when you are not being told the truth, and you are being lied to. The lies seem to be pathological... You should not welcome this emotional manipulation... Because her husband was Charlie Kirk. That is absolutely ridiculous!" TPUSA ran Charlie's org into the GROUND—destroyed his legacy with deceit & sellouts. Fans are FED UP, and rightfully so! Erika's pathological lies & manipulation? DONE. Wake up, patriots—boycott the fraud and RT EVERYWHERE if you're done with the manipulation. Watch the FULL episode below, it's FIRE—FOLLOW Candace Owens —The QUEEN of truth. Time to expose the rot! 👑🔥
0:34

🚨 BOMBSHELL: TPUSA Forced to CANCEL Erika Kirk Speaking Events Over MASSIVE Backlash – Erika's DOWNFALL Has Begun‼️☠️ Breaking from tonight's Candace Owens podcast—She's got INSIDER SCOOP: Turning Point USA FORCED to CANCEL multiple events with Erika Kirk as speaker due to OVERWHELMING OUTRAGE from Charlie's true supporters! We see through the SHADY BS: Missing millions & alleged fraud, paranoid mass firings of employees leaking to Candace, platforming Charlie's ENEMIES like Ben Shapiro, cozy interviews with NYT & CBS (Bari Weiss), and sucking up the same Zionist billionaire cash that Charlie REJECTED! Candace nails it: "I Have it on very good authority that they have had to cancel events that Erica was intended to speak at. Because there has been a backlash... and there SHOULD be a backlash when you are not being told the truth, and you are being lied to. The lies seem to be pathological... You should not welcome this emotional manipulation... Because her husband was Charlie Kirk. That is absolutely ridiculous!" TPUSA ran Charlie's org into the GROUND—destroyed his legacy with deceit & sellouts. Fans are FED UP, and rightfully so! Erika's pathological lies & manipulation? DONE. Wake up, patriots—boycott the fraud and RT EVERYWHERE if you're done with the manipulation. Watch the FULL episode below, it's FIRE—FOLLOW Candace Owens —The QUEEN of truth. Time to expose the rot! 👑🔥

Project Constitution

374,740 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨ALERT: Candace Owens CALLS The UNMARKED Building And It Gets EXTREMELY Weird—"We Are NOT The CIA" Says Hopkinson Aircraft Employee🤔 You cannot make this up. Candace Owens just got off the phone with an employee from Hopkinson Aircraft—the mysterious, unmarked building where Erika Kirk allegedly collapsed after getting the news about Charlie. And the phone call was an absolute masterclass in suspicious behavior. Here is exactly what happened when Candace made contact: 1. "WE ARE TOTALLY NOT A CIA FRONT" Right off the bat, the employee wanted Candace to clarify to her audience that Hopkinson Aircraft is not a CIA front company and that they "do real business." Candace relayed this with heavy sarcasm, noting that the website still looks incredibly weird, but sure, it's just a normal business. 2. THE MIRACLE CONNECTION How did Candace even get this guy on the phone? By total coincidence, a trusted friend of hers in Scottsdale happened to be at a dinner with this Hopkinson employee. The employee casually told the friend that he was there when Erika Kirk got the news that Charlie was dead. The friend immediately texted Candace to connect them. 3. THE DEPOSITION MELTDOWN Candace called the guy, thinking he would just naturally confirm what he had already told her friend. If Erika was just hanging out at a normal aviation building, confirming her alibi should be no big deal, right? Instead, the employee completely clammed up. When asked if he saw Erika: "I will neither confirm nor deny." When asked if he told other people he saw her: "I can neither confirm nor deny." When asked if Candace's friend was lying: "I'm not saying that person's a liar. I just can neither confirm nor deny." THE BOTTOM LINE As Candace pointed out, this isn't a federal court hearing. If Hopkinson Aircraft is just a regular, run-of-the-mill aviation business, and Erika was simply standing in their parking lot like a normal person, why is this employee suddenly speaking like a panicked intelligence operative pleading the Fifth? They want us to believe they aren't a front company, but they are acting exactly like one. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode below. 👇
3:26

🚨ALERT: Candace Owens CALLS The UNMARKED Building And It Gets EXTREMELY Weird—"We Are NOT The CIA" Says Hopkinson Aircraft Employee🤔 You cannot make this up. Candace Owens just got off the phone with an employee from Hopkinson Aircraft—the mysterious, unmarked building where Erika Kirk allegedly collapsed after getting the news about Charlie. And the phone call was an absolute masterclass in suspicious behavior. Here is exactly what happened when Candace made contact: 1. "WE ARE TOTALLY NOT A CIA FRONT" Right off the bat, the employee wanted Candace to clarify to her audience that Hopkinson Aircraft is not a CIA front company and that they "do real business." Candace relayed this with heavy sarcasm, noting that the website still looks incredibly weird, but sure, it's just a normal business. 2. THE MIRACLE CONNECTION How did Candace even get this guy on the phone? By total coincidence, a trusted friend of hers in Scottsdale happened to be at a dinner with this Hopkinson employee. The employee casually told the friend that he was there when Erika Kirk got the news that Charlie was dead. The friend immediately texted Candace to connect them. 3. THE DEPOSITION MELTDOWN Candace called the guy, thinking he would just naturally confirm what he had already told her friend. If Erika was just hanging out at a normal aviation building, confirming her alibi should be no big deal, right? Instead, the employee completely clammed up. When asked if he saw Erika: "I will neither confirm nor deny." When asked if he told other people he saw her: "I can neither confirm nor deny." When asked if Candace's friend was lying: "I'm not saying that person's a liar. I just can neither confirm nor deny." THE BOTTOM LINE As Candace pointed out, this isn't a federal court hearing. If Hopkinson Aircraft is just a regular, run-of-the-mill aviation business, and Erika was simply standing in their parking lot like a normal person, why is this employee suddenly speaking like a panicked intelligence operative pleading the Fifth? They want us to believe they aren't a front company, but they are acting exactly like one. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode below. 👇

Project Constitution

182,075 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Analyzing Episode 58. Season 2 aka Balancing the Scales This episode was some of Sinem and Ozan's best work. Their expressions landed every single time, and, frankly, short of screaming what the story is trying to say, they did everything they could to convince the audience that CihAl was, is, and will remain the endgame. With that out of the way, let's begin. We start the episode with Cihan shitting literal bricks as he sees Alya is already at the konak with Sadakat and Meryem arriving, right behind him. The reason is clear - he's caught in a difficult situation yet again. He doesn't want things to look like he's overriding Alya's existence in his life as its core, but circumstances keep making it so that he's put in awkward situations, which only compound his fear of pushing Alya past the point of no return. Meryem is all smiles and teeth at seeing the konak, but the minute her eyes land on Alya, her smile and her eyes drop to the floor. Almost like she was expecting something else entirely, but reality has shamed her. Her eyes remain downcast throughout the entire time she's walking towards Alya, as if Alya's the truth she can't cross eyes with. Alya, on the other hand, remains standing tall. She doesn't flinch, doesn't express any outward anger, but you can see the storm raging in her eyes. When Cihan tells her Meryem will have to stay at the konak, she merely looks at him and nods. And you can see terror mixed with shame (I think) on Cihan's face, but hers remains clear of emotion. And then she walks away, saying she needs to collect Deniz because she's tired. Now that's an exit. Poised, calm, and leaving behind an absolute massacre in the onlookers. The scene where Deniz meets Meryem is another masterpiece because it's very subtle in the message it delivers. Which is - human relations go beyond blood, beyond memory, beyond societal impediments, if the love on both sides is strong enough. When Deniz says he's named after his father, the little boy is telling the truth. Cihan may not be his father in blood, but he's the father Deniz loves, the father he chose for himself. Then the same message is repeated through Deniz about CihAl when Sadakat tries to create trouble by saying Alya and Cihan are divorced. To which Deniz innocently replies, they may be divorced now, but they can get married again. Again, highlighting the importance of human connection. CihAl keep choosing each other through whatever challenge life throws at them, because they love each other equally. Yes, marriages and divorce can be forced, but it's the presence or absence of love that determines the final outcome. Case in point, Alya's marriage to Boran, Cihan's marriage to Seyda, Nare with Ozkan, Zerrin and Demir, etc., etc. That's what anyone opposing CihAl doesn't understand. Love finds a way. Always. That's what the story has been about since the beginning - that love will stand strong in front of all, as long as what you feel is truly love, and not some imitation of it. Also, *hint* *hint* that's the second time someone has mentioned CihAl getting married again, so it's definitely coming. Now for the scene where Cihan and Alya talk in their room. Cihan is right to be afraid of Alya here because he's a first-hand witness to how Alya reacts when she's been betrayed. He's seen how she took off Boran's ring and buried it with him after she found out about the will. An extreme situation compared to this one, absolutely. But fears don't use logic. Cihan knows Alya is strong enough to move on, to rise from the ashes - her strength is what he loves and fears at the same time. So, when he says 'Think of the Cihan in Alya's eyes, I don't want to be that Cihan' he's saying I know it looks like I disregarded you and broke your trust again, but that's not how things were. He needs her to show emotions, not because it'll pander to his ego, but because that's a sign she's still involved. That she's not near the point where she says 'enough is enough.' Alya, on the flip side, can't show her emotions. Because, unlike what Cihan fears, it's because she's so in love with him, so involved, that she's afraid to even ask what Cihan feels. Because if she learns Cihan's past isn't just the past, that he still loves Meryem, it'll shatter her unlike anything else. Despite it all, Cihan manages to reach Alya somehow when he pleads, 'I need you to communicate with me.' It's like his fears break past her barriers and, in turn, allow her to open up a little to him because she admits she doesn't know what to do, and then out comes the real question, 'Don't you feel anything?' Kudos to Cihan for not dodging the question and saying whatever he feels for her is just memory and gratitude. Salak. And I say salak with all my love, because he still misses the elephant in the room. The point is the imbalance. When we tell someone they're the only love of our life, we want an equal declaration in return. If not, the loop remains incomplete - with one side a little more invested than the other. And, CihAl's story thus far has been the opposite of imbalance. Their story is about symmetry; they reflect each other in love, in wounds, in loss. Basically everything. So, how is it that Alya's only love is Cihan, while his isn't? It's not. And that's where that necklace reveal becomes important, but we'll get to that later. For now, let's talk about that little talk in the car. The story itself is giving us hints that this imbalance won't last long, because the minute Alya talks about her first brush with romance is the moment jealous Cihan makes a return. He gets jealous of a nameless, formless, 16-year-old boy who once had the audacity to date his wife. That is, he can't tolerate a contender for Alya's affections even in memory. Cihan is extremely possessive about Alya, which is why he doesn't waste a moment to remind her she told him he's her only love. And Alya, being Alya, doesn't waste a moment in reminding him that he didn't. And then she turns the screw a little by telling Cihan not to burn his heart over her teenage crush because she never planned to marry her crush, nor is she conveniently living under the same roof with him. Mic drop. Cihan's face at that moment is a study in being hoist by one's own petard. Because he's expecting Alya to be okay with something he can't even stand the idea of. He's jealous as hell, but he can't do anything about it. But why is all this happening? Because one of Cihan's biggest truths is - he loved Meryem and lost her. In truth, he didn't love her, which is why he didn't fight hard enough, which is why he lost her. If Cihan had truly loved Meryem the way he loves Alya, he would have fought until the bitter end. Like he's doing for Alya. That's the truth. In Uzak, true love isn't passive - it demands to be seen, to be felt, it doesn't sit back quietly and accept defeat. In this story, love demands to be chosen. And Cihan didn't choose Meryem, not in the way it matters. So, why can't Cihan just accept the truth already? Fear and guilt, I think. Fear of the magnitude of what he feels for Alya, and what losing her would do to him. And guilt because some part of him knows he didn't do for Meryem what he's doing for Alya. And of course, now there's the burden of her shitty ex, too. Nonetheless, fate keeps pushing Cihan to realize the truth, over and over again in this episode. Another glimpse of how passive Cihan may have been in his relationship with Meryem is the dinner scene. Sadakat points out how much Meryem loved stuffed kebabs, and Cihan is barely listening. This is the same man who knows what Alya likes to eat when she's on break during duty. When Meryem points out Cihan's allergy, he says it was something he had in the past, but no longer. Almost like he's comparing the feelings he once had for her to an allergy. What an allegory. See? The signs are all there, but Cihan isn't picking up on them completely. Then fate ups the ante with the arrival of Chef Engin. The first thing Cihan asks Alya when Engin is gone is - Is that him? As in, is that the boy you said loved you? The man goes off the rails in 0 to 60 seconds, and keeps coming up with excuses like he may have changed his name or appearance. The idea of not being the only man in Alya's life makes him lose his cool while Alya rightly points out that she's not the one living with her 'first love' currently. Which then leads to Cihan spending the night at the office. So, fate manages to teach him one lesson here. Which is - ask only for that which you're ready to give. Cihan needs emotional exclusivity from Alya, but hasn't given her the same yet. He's not built to share Alya, not with the past, not with a memory, not with anything. But the second he feels even a fraction of what Alya's been going through, he unravels marvelously. And that's the entire point of that sequence. It's not just jealous drama, it's exposure. Cihan is slowly being led towards the one truth staring him in the face. That's where the necklace comes in. Thus far, Ciho seems to be operating under the misconception that Meryem has moved on, like him. But that necklace (and the video) prove otherwise. Meryem's current attachment to him throws neutrality out the window. Because Cihan will now have to set absolute boundaries, and in doing so, understand why he's setting them. Why what he feels for Alya leaves no room for anyone else because he can't stand the idea of something similar in Alya's past, present, or future. Because they are each other's exception, and everyone else was the rule. And that's it from me for now. Till later. Happy reading, y'all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir
2:09

Analyzing Episode 58. Season 2 aka Balancing the Scales This episode was some of Sinem and Ozan's best work. Their expressions landed every single time, and, frankly, short of screaming what the story is trying to say, they did everything they could to convince the audience that CihAl was, is, and will remain the endgame. With that out of the way, let's begin. We start the episode with Cihan shitting literal bricks as he sees Alya is already at the konak with Sadakat and Meryem arriving, right behind him. The reason is clear - he's caught in a difficult situation yet again. He doesn't want things to look like he's overriding Alya's existence in his life as its core, but circumstances keep making it so that he's put in awkward situations, which only compound his fear of pushing Alya past the point of no return. Meryem is all smiles and teeth at seeing the konak, but the minute her eyes land on Alya, her smile and her eyes drop to the floor. Almost like she was expecting something else entirely, but reality has shamed her. Her eyes remain downcast throughout the entire time she's walking towards Alya, as if Alya's the truth she can't cross eyes with. Alya, on the other hand, remains standing tall. She doesn't flinch, doesn't express any outward anger, but you can see the storm raging in her eyes. When Cihan tells her Meryem will have to stay at the konak, she merely looks at him and nods. And you can see terror mixed with shame (I think) on Cihan's face, but hers remains clear of emotion. And then she walks away, saying she needs to collect Deniz because she's tired. Now that's an exit. Poised, calm, and leaving behind an absolute massacre in the onlookers. The scene where Deniz meets Meryem is another masterpiece because it's very subtle in the message it delivers. Which is - human relations go beyond blood, beyond memory, beyond societal impediments, if the love on both sides is strong enough. When Deniz says he's named after his father, the little boy is telling the truth. Cihan may not be his father in blood, but he's the father Deniz loves, the father he chose for himself. Then the same message is repeated through Deniz about CihAl when Sadakat tries to create trouble by saying Alya and Cihan are divorced. To which Deniz innocently replies, they may be divorced now, but they can get married again. Again, highlighting the importance of human connection. CihAl keep choosing each other through whatever challenge life throws at them, because they love each other equally. Yes, marriages and divorce can be forced, but it's the presence or absence of love that determines the final outcome. Case in point, Alya's marriage to Boran, Cihan's marriage to Seyda, Nare with Ozkan, Zerrin and Demir, etc., etc. That's what anyone opposing CihAl doesn't understand. Love finds a way. Always. That's what the story has been about since the beginning - that love will stand strong in front of all, as long as what you feel is truly love, and not some imitation of it. Also, *hint* *hint* that's the second time someone has mentioned CihAl getting married again, so it's definitely coming. Now for the scene where Cihan and Alya talk in their room. Cihan is right to be afraid of Alya here because he's a first-hand witness to how Alya reacts when she's been betrayed. He's seen how she took off Boran's ring and buried it with him after she found out about the will. An extreme situation compared to this one, absolutely. But fears don't use logic. Cihan knows Alya is strong enough to move on, to rise from the ashes - her strength is what he loves and fears at the same time. So, when he says 'Think of the Cihan in Alya's eyes, I don't want to be that Cihan' he's saying I know it looks like I disregarded you and broke your trust again, but that's not how things were. He needs her to show emotions, not because it'll pander to his ego, but because that's a sign she's still involved. That she's not near the point where she says 'enough is enough.' Alya, on the flip side, can't show her emotions. Because, unlike what Cihan fears, it's because she's so in love with him, so involved, that she's afraid to even ask what Cihan feels. Because if she learns Cihan's past isn't just the past, that he still loves Meryem, it'll shatter her unlike anything else. Despite it all, Cihan manages to reach Alya somehow when he pleads, 'I need you to communicate with me.' It's like his fears break past her barriers and, in turn, allow her to open up a little to him because she admits she doesn't know what to do, and then out comes the real question, 'Don't you feel anything?' Kudos to Cihan for not dodging the question and saying whatever he feels for her is just memory and gratitude. Salak. And I say salak with all my love, because he still misses the elephant in the room. The point is the imbalance. When we tell someone they're the only love of our life, we want an equal declaration in return. If not, the loop remains incomplete - with one side a little more invested than the other. And, CihAl's story thus far has been the opposite of imbalance. Their story is about symmetry; they reflect each other in love, in wounds, in loss. Basically everything. So, how is it that Alya's only love is Cihan, while his isn't? It's not. And that's where that necklace reveal becomes important, but we'll get to that later. For now, let's talk about that little talk in the car. The story itself is giving us hints that this imbalance won't last long, because the minute Alya talks about her first brush with romance is the moment jealous Cihan makes a return. He gets jealous of a nameless, formless, 16-year-old boy who once had the audacity to date his wife. That is, he can't tolerate a contender for Alya's affections even in memory. Cihan is extremely possessive about Alya, which is why he doesn't waste a moment to remind her she told him he's her only love. And Alya, being Alya, doesn't waste a moment in reminding him that he didn't. And then she turns the screw a little by telling Cihan not to burn his heart over her teenage crush because she never planned to marry her crush, nor is she conveniently living under the same roof with him. Mic drop. Cihan's face at that moment is a study in being hoist by one's own petard. Because he's expecting Alya to be okay with something he can't even stand the idea of. He's jealous as hell, but he can't do anything about it. But why is all this happening? Because one of Cihan's biggest truths is - he loved Meryem and lost her. In truth, he didn't love her, which is why he didn't fight hard enough, which is why he lost her. If Cihan had truly loved Meryem the way he loves Alya, he would have fought until the bitter end. Like he's doing for Alya. That's the truth. In Uzak, true love isn't passive - it demands to be seen, to be felt, it doesn't sit back quietly and accept defeat. In this story, love demands to be chosen. And Cihan didn't choose Meryem, not in the way it matters. So, why can't Cihan just accept the truth already? Fear and guilt, I think. Fear of the magnitude of what he feels for Alya, and what losing her would do to him. And guilt because some part of him knows he didn't do for Meryem what he's doing for Alya. And of course, now there's the burden of her shitty ex, too. Nonetheless, fate keeps pushing Cihan to realize the truth, over and over again in this episode. Another glimpse of how passive Cihan may have been in his relationship with Meryem is the dinner scene. Sadakat points out how much Meryem loved stuffed kebabs, and Cihan is barely listening. This is the same man who knows what Alya likes to eat when she's on break during duty. When Meryem points out Cihan's allergy, he says it was something he had in the past, but no longer. Almost like he's comparing the feelings he once had for her to an allergy. What an allegory. See? The signs are all there, but Cihan isn't picking up on them completely. Then fate ups the ante with the arrival of Chef Engin. The first thing Cihan asks Alya when Engin is gone is - Is that him? As in, is that the boy you said loved you? The man goes off the rails in 0 to 60 seconds, and keeps coming up with excuses like he may have changed his name or appearance. The idea of not being the only man in Alya's life makes him lose his cool while Alya rightly points out that she's not the one living with her 'first love' currently. Which then leads to Cihan spending the night at the office. So, fate manages to teach him one lesson here. Which is - ask only for that which you're ready to give. Cihan needs emotional exclusivity from Alya, but hasn't given her the same yet. He's not built to share Alya, not with the past, not with a memory, not with anything. But the second he feels even a fraction of what Alya's been going through, he unravels marvelously. And that's the entire point of that sequence. It's not just jealous drama, it's exposure. Cihan is slowly being led towards the one truth staring him in the face. That's where the necklace comes in. Thus far, Ciho seems to be operating under the misconception that Meryem has moved on, like him. But that necklace (and the video) prove otherwise. Meryem's current attachment to him throws neutrality out the window. Because Cihan will now have to set absolute boundaries, and in doing so, understand why he's setting them. Why what he feels for Alya leaves no room for anyone else because he can't stand the idea of something similar in Alya's past, present, or future. Because they are each other's exception, and everyone else was the rule. And that's it from me for now. Till later. Happy reading, y'all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

15,453 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-
0:38

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-

Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo

28,735 просмотров • 1 год назад

Folks, Juan here with urgent updates: Tina Peters is deteriorating steadily now. She continues to fight a deep cough that mimics the cough she had when she was first diagnosed with lung cancer. Her prison cell is cold. Tina is 70 years old and it’s a medical fact that skin often gets thinner with age, making it more difficult to keep warm with the blankets notoriously thin and prison rules do not allow one to bundle up. Before I go into detail about Tina, allow me to cut to the chase. Please spread this message far and wide: Call the White House Switchboard DAILY between 10am and 3pm EST at 202-456-1414 and request that Political Prisoner and National Hero Tina Peters be released from prison immediately. Let the Commander in Chief know that your going to support him 100% when he initiates a ‘drastic’ and ‘ICONIC’ move to protect the most ‘ICONIC’ figure in the election integrity movement, Tina Peters. As Patton demanded of his troops racing to Bastogne, “Faster! we’ve got to move faster.” There’s brave people dying up there!!!’ President Trump has made his desire excruciatingly clear that Tina Peters needs to be freed. For reasons known best to him he has held back on executing the ‘DRASTIC’ actions he has threatened in order to set her free, thus far. Most of us fully trust President Trump’s instincts concerning his next moves, keeping in mind timing is everything. Tina is showing signs of serious dehydration. On Friday, she was tagged to do a ‘drug’ test and urinate in the cup. She was so dehydrated she could not release any urine and was unable to get a enough spittle to satisfy them either. Tina also complained about having brain fog. She’s been so physically weak she did not feel safe walking to the medical window to be seen (for whatever that would be worth) so she stayed in bed. Tina needs to be seen by OUTSIDE MEDICAL PERSONNEL. Colorado Governor Polis has made it clear that no amount of outside or Federal pressure is going to change his mind concerning Tina’s incarceration. I want to share that I am aware of at least three well-advanced legal efforts to free Tina going on right now. Due to their sensitive nature, I will not discuss those strategies here, but I can tell you that each effort is well thought out and being taken seriously. Tina Peters is an ‘ICONIC’ figure in the election integrity arena. She has served our cause well like a modern day Oscar Koch! She identified the potential threat to have election information permanently and irreversibly destroyed, and she worked to sound the alarm in all the correct places. Time has proven her to have been totally correct in her concerns and subsequent actions. Just like what happened with Oscar Koch and Tina Peters—on our way to the 2026 mid-terms—everyone here should expect all manner of break-out attempts by the election manipulators. They will not, and cannot, stop with their election system frauds. We must be sober in anticipating their next actions and be relentless in pressing for just and honest elections. Harsh and rapid consequences must be meted out wherever election fraud is uncovered, both past and present. Both sides now see Tina Peters as an ‘ICONIC’ figure. For the election fraudsters, they must show EVERYONE that anyone who challenges them will pay a price. They also are successfully showing, thus far, that they have methods and tactics which are invincible with the ‘system’ completely under their control. Conversely, any action that rescues Tina is like the ‘closing of the ranks’ when ‘Cobra King’ linked up with the men of the 101st Airborne. Up to now, Tina has only heard the distant reports of her relief, but thus far, her hope is fading as there are no tanks being seen coming through the fog at the crest of a nearby hill. While she initially believed that she was in charge of ‘The Gold Standard of Elections Systems’ in Mesa County Colorado, the evidence appeared to show something else. She did not dither. She initiated a back-up operation. As a result, she became the rabbit that all the fraudsters chased. As they turned on her, they actually exposed themselves more clearly by the day. Tina traveled the country and explained what she had found and documented. She literally worked her life and fingers to the bone helping fellow patriots arm themselves with the weapons necessary to fight their own local battles against machine frauds in counties across America. Tina has done her job and, like Bill Turner, it is long past time to get her EVAC’d out and IMMEDIATELY PLEASE. It’s time we ‘highballed’ it through our enemies' defenses and save her while there is still time. Do not forget to call the White House Switchboard!
2:17

Folks, Juan here with urgent updates: Tina Peters is deteriorating steadily now. She continues to fight a deep cough that mimics the cough she had when she was first diagnosed with lung cancer. Her prison cell is cold. Tina is 70 years old and it’s a medical fact that skin often gets thinner with age, making it more difficult to keep warm with the blankets notoriously thin and prison rules do not allow one to bundle up. Before I go into detail about Tina, allow me to cut to the chase. Please spread this message far and wide: Call the White House Switchboard DAILY between 10am and 3pm EST at 202-456-1414 and request that Political Prisoner and National Hero Tina Peters be released from prison immediately. Let the Commander in Chief know that your going to support him 100% when he initiates a ‘drastic’ and ‘ICONIC’ move to protect the most ‘ICONIC’ figure in the election integrity movement, Tina Peters. As Patton demanded of his troops racing to Bastogne, “Faster! we’ve got to move faster.” There’s brave people dying up there!!!’ President Trump has made his desire excruciatingly clear that Tina Peters needs to be freed. For reasons known best to him he has held back on executing the ‘DRASTIC’ actions he has threatened in order to set her free, thus far. Most of us fully trust President Trump’s instincts concerning his next moves, keeping in mind timing is everything. Tina is showing signs of serious dehydration. On Friday, she was tagged to do a ‘drug’ test and urinate in the cup. She was so dehydrated she could not release any urine and was unable to get a enough spittle to satisfy them either. Tina also complained about having brain fog. She’s been so physically weak she did not feel safe walking to the medical window to be seen (for whatever that would be worth) so she stayed in bed. Tina needs to be seen by OUTSIDE MEDICAL PERSONNEL. Colorado Governor Polis has made it clear that no amount of outside or Federal pressure is going to change his mind concerning Tina’s incarceration. I want to share that I am aware of at least three well-advanced legal efforts to free Tina going on right now. Due to their sensitive nature, I will not discuss those strategies here, but I can tell you that each effort is well thought out and being taken seriously. Tina Peters is an ‘ICONIC’ figure in the election integrity arena. She has served our cause well like a modern day Oscar Koch! She identified the potential threat to have election information permanently and irreversibly destroyed, and she worked to sound the alarm in all the correct places. Time has proven her to have been totally correct in her concerns and subsequent actions. Just like what happened with Oscar Koch and Tina Peters—on our way to the 2026 mid-terms—everyone here should expect all manner of break-out attempts by the election manipulators. They will not, and cannot, stop with their election system frauds. We must be sober in anticipating their next actions and be relentless in pressing for just and honest elections. Harsh and rapid consequences must be meted out wherever election fraud is uncovered, both past and present. Both sides now see Tina Peters as an ‘ICONIC’ figure. For the election fraudsters, they must show EVERYONE that anyone who challenges them will pay a price. They also are successfully showing, thus far, that they have methods and tactics which are invincible with the ‘system’ completely under their control. Conversely, any action that rescues Tina is like the ‘closing of the ranks’ when ‘Cobra King’ linked up with the men of the 101st Airborne. Up to now, Tina has only heard the distant reports of her relief, but thus far, her hope is fading as there are no tanks being seen coming through the fog at the crest of a nearby hill. While she initially believed that she was in charge of ‘The Gold Standard of Elections Systems’ in Mesa County Colorado, the evidence appeared to show something else. She did not dither. She initiated a back-up operation. As a result, she became the rabbit that all the fraudsters chased. As they turned on her, they actually exposed themselves more clearly by the day. Tina traveled the country and explained what she had found and documented. She literally worked her life and fingers to the bone helping fellow patriots arm themselves with the weapons necessary to fight their own local battles against machine frauds in counties across America. Tina has done her job and, like Bill Turner, it is long past time to get her EVAC’d out and IMMEDIATELY PLEASE. It’s time we ‘highballed’ it through our enemies' defenses and save her while there is still time. Do not forget to call the White House Switchboard!

Juan O Savin 107®

23,886 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk’s Alibi DESTROYED. Was She Hiding In An Office For a CIA Front Company When Charlie Died? Candace Owens just dropped one of the most explosive, spine-chilling puzzle pieces of the entire September 10th timeline. For months, everyone has asked the same question: Where was Erika Kirk on the day her husband was assassinated? She claimed she collapsed in a parking lot. No witnesses. She claimed she rushed through a busy private airport terminal in Scottsdale with an entourage and a priest. No witnesses. For the widow of the most famous conservative organizer in the country, she was practically a ghost. Today, Candace finally revealed why nobody saw her. Erika Kirk was allegedly hiding inside an unmarked, hidden building. Here are the staggering receipts Candace just laid out. 👇 THE SHADOW BROKERAGE Candace’s team uncovered that when Erika received the final call from the doctor that Charlie was dead, she wasn't in the main Atlantic Aviation terminal. She was allegedly staging at the office of Hopkinson Aircraft—a "luxury jet brokerage." But there is a massive, glaring problem with Hopkinson Aircraft. Candace’s investigators discovered that Hopkinson does not have a real address. They use the public address of the busy Atlantic Aviation FBO, and Atlantic accepts all their mail. But Hopkinson is actually located in a separate, obscure, unmarked building hidden behind the main terminal. THE "CIA FRONT" THEORY Candace said the quiet part out loud: “It felt to me like a CIA front.” Think about it logically. Why would a luxury jet brokerage—where transactions are done by phone and the actual jets are housed all over the world—pay for a physical office space in a massively expensive Scottsdale terminal, only to operate out of an unmarked, hidden building with no address? And more importantly: Why was Erika Kirk staging inside this obscure, hidden facility at the exact moment her husband was shot? This explains everything about the flight anomalies and the missing executives. Candace theorizes that this unmarked building wasn't just a random stop—it was a pre-approved, secure location where you couldn't just "wander in." It was a place to stay completely unseen by the public. This brings us right back to TPUSA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet. Was he flying out of Santa Barbara, or was he already on Charlie’s plane because this unmarked building was the secret rendezvous point for the syndicate? THE BOTTOM LINE You don't accidentally end up in an unlisted, unmarked aviation building while your husband is being assassinated. The timeline is shattering. The alibis are falling apart. It’s time to investigate Hopkinson Aircraft, subpoena the flight manifests, and find out exactly who was pulling the strings inside that room. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT, and Watch her FULL episode below.
10:20

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk’s Alibi DESTROYED. Was She Hiding In An Office For a CIA Front Company When Charlie Died? Candace Owens just dropped one of the most explosive, spine-chilling puzzle pieces of the entire September 10th timeline. For months, everyone has asked the same question: Where was Erika Kirk on the day her husband was assassinated? She claimed she collapsed in a parking lot. No witnesses. She claimed she rushed through a busy private airport terminal in Scottsdale with an entourage and a priest. No witnesses. For the widow of the most famous conservative organizer in the country, she was practically a ghost. Today, Candace finally revealed why nobody saw her. Erika Kirk was allegedly hiding inside an unmarked, hidden building. Here are the staggering receipts Candace just laid out. 👇 THE SHADOW BROKERAGE Candace’s team uncovered that when Erika received the final call from the doctor that Charlie was dead, she wasn't in the main Atlantic Aviation terminal. She was allegedly staging at the office of Hopkinson Aircraft—a "luxury jet brokerage." But there is a massive, glaring problem with Hopkinson Aircraft. Candace’s investigators discovered that Hopkinson does not have a real address. They use the public address of the busy Atlantic Aviation FBO, and Atlantic accepts all their mail. But Hopkinson is actually located in a separate, obscure, unmarked building hidden behind the main terminal. THE "CIA FRONT" THEORY Candace said the quiet part out loud: “It felt to me like a CIA front.” Think about it logically. Why would a luxury jet brokerage—where transactions are done by phone and the actual jets are housed all over the world—pay for a physical office space in a massively expensive Scottsdale terminal, only to operate out of an unmarked, hidden building with no address? And more importantly: Why was Erika Kirk staging inside this obscure, hidden facility at the exact moment her husband was shot? This explains everything about the flight anomalies and the missing executives. Candace theorizes that this unmarked building wasn't just a random stop—it was a pre-approved, secure location where you couldn't just "wander in." It was a place to stay completely unseen by the public. This brings us right back to TPUSA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet. Was he flying out of Santa Barbara, or was he already on Charlie’s plane because this unmarked building was the secret rendezvous point for the syndicate? THE BOTTOM LINE You don't accidentally end up in an unlisted, unmarked aviation building while your husband is being assassinated. The timeline is shattering. The alibis are falling apart. It’s time to investigate Hopkinson Aircraft, subpoena the flight manifests, and find out exactly who was pulling the strings inside that room. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT, and Watch her FULL episode below.

Project Constitution

272,001 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨SHOCKING: Charlie Kirk’s Own COUSIN DETOURED HIM To Salt Lake So He'd NEVER See The BLUE EGYPTIAN PLANE In Provo. 😱 The morning Charlie Kirk was supposed to land in Provo for the UVU event, a private blue Egyptian jet was sitting on the tarmac — the exact plane Candace Owens just exposed as belonging to the Egyptian's and possibly connected to Mossad who Charlie was about to burn to the ground. Charlie would have recognized it instantly. He would have known something was off the second his wheels touched down. So they made sure he landed at a different airport. His cousin Brian Simowitz — former USAF, married to Kelly Simowitz who btw is a major TPUSA Faith donor — the same organization now crumbling under massive scrutiny after Candace Owens’ explosive revelations. Brian arranged the “private interview” with a Salt Lake City restauranteur the morning before the UVU event. That one meeting forced Charlie’s flight to divert 45 miles north… and kept him completely blind to what was waiting in Provo —and when Charlie collapsed hours later, Brian was mysteriously the only family member already in Utah, making medical decisions until Erika arrived. This isn’t coincidence; it’s a family insider greasing the rails for foreign hitters and TPUSA clean-up crews. Brian and Kelly aren’t footnotes—they’re potential suspects in a hit that reeks of MK Ultra psyops and Zionist pulling the strings. RT and share with me any information you find into Brian and his wife Kelly, and as usual Tag Candace Owens so bring her up to speed. FOLLOW: And Go Check Out His FULL Livestream, Linked in the comments below.
6:55

🚨SHOCKING: Charlie Kirk’s Own COUSIN DETOURED HIM To Salt Lake So He'd NEVER See The BLUE EGYPTIAN PLANE In Provo. 😱 The morning Charlie Kirk was supposed to land in Provo for the UVU event, a private blue Egyptian jet was sitting on the tarmac — the exact plane Candace Owens just exposed as belonging to the Egyptian's and possibly connected to Mossad who Charlie was about to burn to the ground. Charlie would have recognized it instantly. He would have known something was off the second his wheels touched down. So they made sure he landed at a different airport. His cousin Brian Simowitz — former USAF, married to Kelly Simowitz who btw is a major TPUSA Faith donor — the same organization now crumbling under massive scrutiny after Candace Owens’ explosive revelations. Brian arranged the “private interview” with a Salt Lake City restauranteur the morning before the UVU event. That one meeting forced Charlie’s flight to divert 45 miles north… and kept him completely blind to what was waiting in Provo —and when Charlie collapsed hours later, Brian was mysteriously the only family member already in Utah, making medical decisions until Erika arrived. This isn’t coincidence; it’s a family insider greasing the rails for foreign hitters and TPUSA clean-up crews. Brian and Kelly aren’t footnotes—they’re potential suspects in a hit that reeks of MK Ultra psyops and Zionist pulling the strings. RT and share with me any information you find into Brian and his wife Kelly, and as usual Tag Candace Owens so bring her up to speed. FOLLOW: And Go Check Out His FULL Livestream, Linked in the comments below.

Project Constitution

289,729 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨SHOCKING: Candace Owens SLAMS Trump’s Stupid Reason for the Iran War—"We Did It Out Of HABIT"😱" We don't need the oil. We just did it out of habit." — Donald Trump, 2026. Tonight, Candace Owens played the clip that should end the political career of any "America First" leader. While American sons and daughters are being sent into an Iranian quagmire, Trump’s explanation for starting the war is so nonsensical that Candace says it’s "impossible to put into words how stupid he is." 🚬 The "Cigarette" Vibe Candace mocked Trump’s admission that the U.S. is "in the habit" of Middle Eastern intervention. The Analogy: She compared Trump’s war-mongering to a grandmother who can't kick a smoking habit. "It’s a habit we're trying to kick—not murdering Muslim kids for no reason—but then we saw the school, saw the girls, and we just couldn't help it." The Reality: There is no strategy. There is no national security threat. It’s just a decades-long addiction to intervention that Trump promised to end, but instead, he has doubled down on. 🏗️ A "Trump Building" on Top of Gaza Candace went straight for the jugular on the Israel connection. The Slave Narrative: She accused Trump of being a "slave to Israel," claiming the only ally asking for this war is Netanyahu. The Gaudy Gold: "You just want them to put your name on a building in Gaza, and then put the building on top of all the dead kids... it'll say 'Trump' in that gaudy gold." 🚩 🏛️ BAGHDAD IS FALLING: The Vatican-Sized Disaster While the White House focuses on Iran, the rest of the region is collapsing. The Embassy Attack: Candace highlighted the drone strike on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad—a complex bigger than Vatican City. The Evacuation: Trump is now urging citizens to flee Iraq. Candace’s verdict? "We’re already losing. We’re losing because we can’t kick the habit of murdering Muslims for no reason just because Israel wants to steal their resources." 🚩 THE VERDICT The "Zio-vibes" and "Red Heifer" prophecies are leading America into a global catastrophe. If the reason for war is "habit" and "allies" who are currently dragging us into a regional firestorm, then the "America First" movement has been completely hijacked. Watch Trump's own words. He isn't even trying to pretend this is about US safety anymore. It's a habit. And it's a habit that's going to cost us everything. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL episode below.👇
3:30

🚨SHOCKING: Candace Owens SLAMS Trump’s Stupid Reason for the Iran War—"We Did It Out Of HABIT"😱" We don't need the oil. We just did it out of habit." — Donald Trump, 2026. Tonight, Candace Owens played the clip that should end the political career of any "America First" leader. While American sons and daughters are being sent into an Iranian quagmire, Trump’s explanation for starting the war is so nonsensical that Candace says it’s "impossible to put into words how stupid he is." 🚬 The "Cigarette" Vibe Candace mocked Trump’s admission that the U.S. is "in the habit" of Middle Eastern intervention. The Analogy: She compared Trump’s war-mongering to a grandmother who can't kick a smoking habit. "It’s a habit we're trying to kick—not murdering Muslim kids for no reason—but then we saw the school, saw the girls, and we just couldn't help it." The Reality: There is no strategy. There is no national security threat. It’s just a decades-long addiction to intervention that Trump promised to end, but instead, he has doubled down on. 🏗️ A "Trump Building" on Top of Gaza Candace went straight for the jugular on the Israel connection. The Slave Narrative: She accused Trump of being a "slave to Israel," claiming the only ally asking for this war is Netanyahu. The Gaudy Gold: "You just want them to put your name on a building in Gaza, and then put the building on top of all the dead kids... it'll say 'Trump' in that gaudy gold." 🚩 🏛️ BAGHDAD IS FALLING: The Vatican-Sized Disaster While the White House focuses on Iran, the rest of the region is collapsing. The Embassy Attack: Candace highlighted the drone strike on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad—a complex bigger than Vatican City. The Evacuation: Trump is now urging citizens to flee Iraq. Candace’s verdict? "We’re already losing. We’re losing because we can’t kick the habit of murdering Muslims for no reason just because Israel wants to steal their resources." 🚩 THE VERDICT The "Zio-vibes" and "Red Heifer" prophecies are leading America into a global catastrophe. If the reason for war is "habit" and "allies" who are currently dragging us into a regional firestorm, then the "America First" movement has been completely hijacked. Watch Trump's own words. He isn't even trying to pretend this is about US safety anymore. It's a habit. And it's a habit that's going to cost us everything. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL episode below.👇

Project Constitution

64,612 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A message: To all women in the Western world, in Canada, the USA and Europe, this is the fate that Allah from the Holy Quran and Muhammad is planning for you. Read and learn the attached holy commandments and listen to the testimony of this Yazidi girl. Muhammad in the seventh century was the founder of the first Islamic state. Quran 33.50 "O Prophet) Muhammad) !Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses - whom Allâh has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammât (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlât( maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her - a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allâh is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." Muhammad Muhsin Khan. The Noble Quran: Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur'an in the English Language (English and Arabic Edition) (pp. 1665-1666). Kindle Edition. Commentaries for 33.50 - Ibn Al Kathir. (those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses whom Allah has given to you,) means, `the slave-girls whom you took from the war booty are also permitted to you. Quran 33.21 "Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh(Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes for (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day, and remembers Allâh much." Muhammad Muhsin Khan. The Noble Quran: Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur'an in the English Language (English and Arabic Edition) (p. 1648). Kindle Edition. Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959: It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. Sahih (Darussalam) - Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection." Sahih al-Bukhari 5210 Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Sa`id said, "We went out with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist." Sahih al-Bukhari 4138 Narrated Buraida: The Prophet (ﷺ) sent `Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated `Ali, and `Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, "Don't you see this (i.e. `Ali)?" When we reached the Prophet (ﷺ) I mentioned that to him. He said, "O Buraida! Do you hate `Ali?" I said, "Yes." He said, "Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumlus." Sahih al-Bukhari 4350 (711)Chapter: Regarding Intercourse With Captives: Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) were reluctant to have relations with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say that they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period. Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani) - Sunan Abi Dawud 2155 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet(ﷺ) a man from the Ansar came and said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?" Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Do you do that? It is better for you not to do it, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created." Sahih al-Bukhari 6603 Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "If a lady slave commits illegal sexual intercourse and she is proved guilty of illegal sexual intercourse, then she should be flogged (fifty stripes) but she should not be admonished; and if she commits illegal sexual intercourse again, then she should be flogged again but should not be admonished; and if she commits illegal sexual intercourse for the third time, then she should be sold even for a hair rope." Sahih al-Bukhari 6839 Link: Former Islamic state group sex slave speaks out: "every day we were humiliated and raped"
1:47

A message: To all women in the Western world, in Canada, the USA and Europe, this is the fate that Allah from the Holy Quran and Muhammad is planning for you. Read and learn the attached holy commandments and listen to the testimony of this Yazidi girl. Muhammad in the seventh century was the founder of the first Islamic state. Quran 33.50 "O Prophet) Muhammad) !Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses - whom Allâh has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammât (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlât( maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her - a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allâh is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." Muhammad Muhsin Khan. The Noble Quran: Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur'an in the English Language (English and Arabic Edition) (pp. 1665-1666). Kindle Edition. Commentaries for 33.50 - Ibn Al Kathir. (those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses whom Allah has given to you,) means, `the slave-girls whom you took from the war booty are also permitted to you. Quran 33.21 "Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh(Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes for (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day, and remembers Allâh much." Muhammad Muhsin Khan. The Noble Quran: Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur'an in the English Language (English and Arabic Edition) (p. 1648). Kindle Edition. Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959: It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. Sahih (Darussalam) - Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection." Sahih al-Bukhari 5210 Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Sa`id said, "We went out with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist." Sahih al-Bukhari 4138 Narrated Buraida: The Prophet (ﷺ) sent `Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated `Ali, and `Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, "Don't you see this (i.e. `Ali)?" When we reached the Prophet (ﷺ) I mentioned that to him. He said, "O Buraida! Do you hate `Ali?" I said, "Yes." He said, "Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumlus." Sahih al-Bukhari 4350 (711)Chapter: Regarding Intercourse With Captives: Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) were reluctant to have relations with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say that they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period. Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani) - Sunan Abi Dawud 2155 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet(ﷺ) a man from the Ansar came and said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?" Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Do you do that? It is better for you not to do it, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created." Sahih al-Bukhari 6603 Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "If a lady slave commits illegal sexual intercourse and she is proved guilty of illegal sexual intercourse, then she should be flogged (fifty stripes) but she should not be admonished; and if she commits illegal sexual intercourse again, then she should be flogged again but should not be admonished; and if she commits illegal sexual intercourse for the third time, then she should be sold even for a hair rope." Sahih al-Bukhari 6839 Link: Former Islamic state group sex slave speaks out: "every day we were humiliated and raped"

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

155,080 просмотров • 2 лет назад

As I will show here with proof from the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, video, and pictures: "Slavery and rape—treating female prisoners of war as sex slaves—are two of the highest moral values in Islam." By: Ofer Binshtok. The moral values ​​of the Islamic culture are determined, mainly according to the moral values ​​of Muhammad in which Allah considers to be the exalted character​​in in Quran 68.4. Muhammad is considered for the believers to be an excellent role model according to the Quran 33.21. Quran 33.21 "Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh(Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes for (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day, and remembers Allâh much." Quran 33.50 "O Prophet) Muhammad) !Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses - whom Allâh has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammât (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlât( maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her - a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allâh is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." Commentaries for 33.50 - Ibn Al Kathir: (those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses whom Allah has given to you,) means, `the slave-girls whom you took from the war booty are also permitted to you. Sahih Muslim 1602: "...Allah's Apostle said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves..." Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959 – Sahih: It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. Muhammad was slave owner. Muhammad had slaves and he traded them, and he had female as sex slaves, and he allowed the rape of female prisoners of war. For example: Sahih Bukhari 6909, 6202, 5210, 4913, 2695, 2415. Sunan Abi Dawud, 3358, Sahih. The History of al-Tabari vol. 39 p. 193. Sahih al-Bukhari 5210: Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection." Quran 2.223: "Your wives are as fields for you. You may enter your fields from any place you want. Reserve something good for your souls. Have fear of God and know that you are going to meet Him. (Muhammad) give the glad news to the believers." "Slavery and rape—treating female prisoners of war as sex slaves—are two of the highest moral values in Islam."
0:23

Sensitive content

As I will show here with proof from the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, video, and pictures: "Slavery and rape—treating female prisoners of war as sex slaves—are two of the highest moral values in Islam." By: Ofer Binshtok. The moral values ​​of the Islamic culture are determined, mainly according to the moral values ​​of Muhammad in which Allah considers to be the exalted character​​in in Quran 68.4. Muhammad is considered for the believers to be an excellent role model according to the Quran 33.21. Quran 33.21 "Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh(Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes for (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day, and remembers Allâh much." Quran 33.50 "O Prophet) Muhammad) !Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses - whom Allâh has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammât (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlât( maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her - a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allâh is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." Commentaries for 33.50 - Ibn Al Kathir: (those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses whom Allah has given to you,) means, `the slave-girls whom you took from the war booty are also permitted to you. Sahih Muslim 1602: "...Allah's Apostle said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves..." Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959 – Sahih: It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. Muhammad was slave owner. Muhammad had slaves and he traded them, and he had female as sex slaves, and he allowed the rape of female prisoners of war. For example: Sahih Bukhari 6909, 6202, 5210, 4913, 2695, 2415. Sunan Abi Dawud, 3358, Sahih. The History of al-Tabari vol. 39 p. 193. Sahih al-Bukhari 5210: Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection." Quran 2.223: "Your wives are as fields for you. You may enter your fields from any place you want. Reserve something good for your souls. Have fear of God and know that you are going to meet Him. (Muhammad) give the glad news to the believers." "Slavery and rape—treating female prisoners of war as sex slaves—are two of the highest moral values in Islam."

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

693,152 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I was already starving and then I wattched this video of her eating. GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.5 on TapNow prompt Image1 Main Subject: Young woman, 20, natural everyday appearance, extremely long wavy blonde hair in a loose half-up style with wispy bangs, realistic skin texture, minimal makeup, slightly sleepy but cheerful personality. follow only the proportion of cleavage from this reference image Image1 Wearing a soft mustard-yellow cardigan over a white cotton blouse with a deep plunging scoop neckline that that accentuates her large cleavage, dark navy pleated midi skirt, white ankle socks, brown loafers, and a small canvas shoulder bag. Maintain consistent identity, clothing, hairstyle, and appearance throughout. Location: Quiet traditional neighborhood in Gyeongju on a cool autumn morning. Low tiled-roof houses, stone walls, narrow lanes, small gardens, bicycles, old utility poles, fallen leaves, and a tiny family-owned bakery with a fogged glass window and handwritten Korean signs. No tourists or busy traffic. Visual Style: Ultra-realistic documentary realism. Genuine candid behavior, subtle expressions, natural movement, authentic Korean small-town atmosphere. Camera Style: Early-2000s consumer MiniDV camcorder. Heavy handheld shake, imperfect framing, autofocus hunting between bakery windows and her face, exposure pumping between indoor and outdoor light, faded colors, soft contrast, slight motion blur, DV compression artifacts, mild sensor noise, no stabilization. 00:00–00:03 She walks down the quiet lane carrying her shoulder bag, stepping through fallen leaves. She notices the small bakery and slows down. 00:03–00:06 — Bakery Inside, she looks through the glass display and chooses a freshly baked red-bean bun. Warm bakery light reflects on the glass while autofocus struggles to find her face. The elderly bakery owner smiles and says softly: English subtitle: “Fresh out of the oven.” (방금 구운 거예요.) She gives a small sleepy smile and replies: English subtitle: “Thank you.” (감사합니다.) 00:06–00:09 She steps outside, takes a small bite, and smiles while warm steam escapes from the fresh bread. A bicycle passes behind her. She quietly says to herself: English subtitle: “It’s warm.” (따뜻하다.) 00:09–00:12 She continues toward a nearby stone wall, checking the time on her small wristwatch as morning sunlight reaches the street. She looks toward the camera and murmurs: English subtitle: “I’m going to be late.” (늦겠다.) 00:12–00:15 She notices the camera, laughs softly, gives a quick little wave, and walks away toward the old neighborhood. The operator accidentally points at the pavement before the recording continues. She laughs and says: English subtitle: “Bye.” (안녕.) 00:15–00:18 — Small neighborhood moment After she walks away, the camera follows her loosely. She passes an elderly local resident sweeping fallen leaves near a stone wall. They exchange a brief polite nod. The elderly resident says: English subtitle: “Good morning.” (좋은 아침이에요.) She responds naturally: English subtitle: “Good morning.” (안녕하세요.) The camera lags behind slightly. 00:18–00:21 — Autumn detail She stops beside a tiny garden and notices a few red autumn leaves caught on a bicycle basket. She gently picks one up, looks at it for a second, then puts it back. She quietly says: English subtitle: “Pretty.” (예쁘다.) The camcorder briefly loses focus. 00:21–00:24 — Old neighborhood atmosphere She continues walking past traditional houses. A small dog appears behind a low gate and watches her. She smiles and gives it a tiny wave. She softly says to the dog: English subtitle: “Hi.” (안녕.) The dog remains behind the gate. 00:24–00:27 — Bakery callback She suddenly realizes she is still holding the paper bag. She looks inside, takes another small bite of the red-bean bun, and keeps walking. She smiles and says: English subtitle: “So good.” (맛있다.) The bakery door chime can faintly be heard in the distance. 00:27–00:30 — Imperfect ending She reaches the end of the narrow lane and turns back toward the camera for one last smile. She raises her hand in a casual goodbye. She says softly: English subtitle: “See you.” (또 봐요.) The operator tries to zoom in, but the image becomes soft and shaky. The camera accidentally tilts toward the autumn sky and tiled rooftops, then down toward the pavement. Abrupt MiniDV cut to black. Audio: Natural ambience only–morning birds, footsteps on leaves, bicycle bell, distant scooter, bakery door chime, quiet conversation, paper bag rustling, soft wind, and the girl's natural Korean dialogue. Dialogue should sound spontaneous, quiet, and conversational, never like scripted acting. No music. No narration. Subtitle Style: Burned-in English subtitles for every spoken Korean line, with the original Korean dialogue immediately after the English subtitle in parentheses. Keep subtitles small, simple, white, and slightly imperfect like early consumer-video captions. No modern stylized typography, no animated captions, no text overlays other than the dialogue subtitles. Goal: A forgotten MiniDV recording from 2004, capturing an ordinary autumn morning in historic Gyeongju–quiet, nostalgic, imperfect, intimate, and completely believable.
0:30

I was already starving and then I wattched this video of her eating. GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.5 on TapNow prompt Image1 Main Subject: Young woman, 20, natural everyday appearance, extremely long wavy blonde hair in a loose half-up style with wispy bangs, realistic skin texture, minimal makeup, slightly sleepy but cheerful personality. follow only the proportion of cleavage from this reference image Image1 Wearing a soft mustard-yellow cardigan over a white cotton blouse with a deep plunging scoop neckline that that accentuates her large cleavage, dark navy pleated midi skirt, white ankle socks, brown loafers, and a small canvas shoulder bag. Maintain consistent identity, clothing, hairstyle, and appearance throughout. Location: Quiet traditional neighborhood in Gyeongju on a cool autumn morning. Low tiled-roof houses, stone walls, narrow lanes, small gardens, bicycles, old utility poles, fallen leaves, and a tiny family-owned bakery with a fogged glass window and handwritten Korean signs. No tourists or busy traffic. Visual Style: Ultra-realistic documentary realism. Genuine candid behavior, subtle expressions, natural movement, authentic Korean small-town atmosphere. Camera Style: Early-2000s consumer MiniDV camcorder. Heavy handheld shake, imperfect framing, autofocus hunting between bakery windows and her face, exposure pumping between indoor and outdoor light, faded colors, soft contrast, slight motion blur, DV compression artifacts, mild sensor noise, no stabilization. 00:00–00:03 She walks down the quiet lane carrying her shoulder bag, stepping through fallen leaves. She notices the small bakery and slows down. 00:03–00:06 — Bakery Inside, she looks through the glass display and chooses a freshly baked red-bean bun. Warm bakery light reflects on the glass while autofocus struggles to find her face. The elderly bakery owner smiles and says softly: English subtitle: “Fresh out of the oven.” (방금 구운 거예요.) She gives a small sleepy smile and replies: English subtitle: “Thank you.” (감사합니다.) 00:06–00:09 She steps outside, takes a small bite, and smiles while warm steam escapes from the fresh bread. A bicycle passes behind her. She quietly says to herself: English subtitle: “It’s warm.” (따뜻하다.) 00:09–00:12 She continues toward a nearby stone wall, checking the time on her small wristwatch as morning sunlight reaches the street. She looks toward the camera and murmurs: English subtitle: “I’m going to be late.” (늦겠다.) 00:12–00:15 She notices the camera, laughs softly, gives a quick little wave, and walks away toward the old neighborhood. The operator accidentally points at the pavement before the recording continues. She laughs and says: English subtitle: “Bye.” (안녕.) 00:15–00:18 — Small neighborhood moment After she walks away, the camera follows her loosely. She passes an elderly local resident sweeping fallen leaves near a stone wall. They exchange a brief polite nod. The elderly resident says: English subtitle: “Good morning.” (좋은 아침이에요.) She responds naturally: English subtitle: “Good morning.” (안녕하세요.) The camera lags behind slightly. 00:18–00:21 — Autumn detail She stops beside a tiny garden and notices a few red autumn leaves caught on a bicycle basket. She gently picks one up, looks at it for a second, then puts it back. She quietly says: English subtitle: “Pretty.” (예쁘다.) The camcorder briefly loses focus. 00:21–00:24 — Old neighborhood atmosphere She continues walking past traditional houses. A small dog appears behind a low gate and watches her. She smiles and gives it a tiny wave. She softly says to the dog: English subtitle: “Hi.” (안녕.) The dog remains behind the gate. 00:24–00:27 — Bakery callback She suddenly realizes she is still holding the paper bag. She looks inside, takes another small bite of the red-bean bun, and keeps walking. She smiles and says: English subtitle: “So good.” (맛있다.) The bakery door chime can faintly be heard in the distance. 00:27–00:30 — Imperfect ending She reaches the end of the narrow lane and turns back toward the camera for one last smile. She raises her hand in a casual goodbye. She says softly: English subtitle: “See you.” (또 봐요.) The operator tries to zoom in, but the image becomes soft and shaky. The camera accidentally tilts toward the autumn sky and tiled rooftops, then down toward the pavement. Abrupt MiniDV cut to black. Audio: Natural ambience only–morning birds, footsteps on leaves, bicycle bell, distant scooter, bakery door chime, quiet conversation, paper bag rustling, soft wind, and the girl's natural Korean dialogue. Dialogue should sound spontaneous, quiet, and conversational, never like scripted acting. No music. No narration. Subtitle Style: Burned-in English subtitles for every spoken Korean line, with the original Korean dialogue immediately after the English subtitle in parentheses. Keep subtitles small, simple, white, and slightly imperfect like early consumer-video captions. No modern stylized typography, no animated captions, no text overlays other than the dialogue subtitles. Goal: A forgotten MiniDV recording from 2004, capturing an ordinary autumn morning in historic Gyeongju–quiet, nostalgic, imperfect, intimate, and completely believable.

Sharon Riley

23,599 просмотров • 1 месяц назад