Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Silver Wolf 3rd pose video preview (get access to the full 9 poses video + 150 other full videos on P4treon F4nsly & Ganknow): #hsr #SilverWolf #chudai #銀狼 #スターレイル #HonkaiStarRail #崩坏星穹铁道 #StarRail

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

IT FEELS F**KING ILLEGAL THAT THIS GROK BOT + PICSART SETUP IS PUBLIC And you can copy the entire thing for free. 9 agents. 5 faceless channels. A workflow that takes a story from its original source to published content. Here’s how the team works: 1. FIND A STORY WORTH MAKING → Chief of Staff scores ideas, rejects the weak ones and routes the survivors to the right agent. → Scout finds 10 stories a day, each backed by a primary source. No source? No video. → Scriptwriter turns the strongest stories into 80-second scripts: 7 shots, timings and voiceover. 2. TURN THE IDEA INTO CONTENT → Art Director picks the look and the model for each shot, rotating styles so every video feels different. → Producer generates the visuals in Picsart through MCP and checks the cost before every run. About $9 per finished video. → Editor cuts the clips, adds voice and music, burns captions and finishes the video. 3. FILTER. PUBLISH. IMPROVE. → Auditor checks the last 30 videos and rejects repetitive work. Making content is easy. Knowing what to delete is the valuable part. → Publisher sends cleared content to Shorts, TikTok and Reels, with titles and required disclosures. → Analyst reviews retention and payouts every Monday, then tells the team what to improve and what to stop doing. 42 videos made a week. Around 30 published. About 2 hours of my time. Now the money. This setup earned me $11,000+ in the past month across four streams: • Platform payouts from eligible views. • Sponsorships from brands buying access to the audience. • A $12 digital product. • Memberships bringing in roughly $3.50 net per member. One content operation. Four ways to get paid. You don’t need five channels on day one. Start with one. Get one good video through the pipeline. Learn what people actually watch. Build from there. Another month will pass either way. Give yourself something to show for it. I put the entire setup in the article below: all 9 agent prompts, the Grok Bot + Picsart MCP connection, costs and the full revenue breakdown. Completely free. Nothing gated. Read it, copy the workflow and build your first channel today ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

10,816 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Claude Code can now make full videos from your terminal.. Not slideshows. Not text on screen.. Actual motion graphics with animations, transitions, custom photos, and background music. [ SHARED A TUTORIAL BELOW EDITED WITH THIS SETUP IN JUST 5mins ] ▫️Here's the setup: Claude Code + Remotion Remotion is a React based framework that renders video programmatically. You describe what you want in plain English, Claude writes the React components and Remotion renders it into a real MP4. What you can actually do with this: > Generate 9:16 vertical videos for TikTok / Reels / Shorts > Add animated text with viral hooks and safe zones > Pull live web screenshots directly into your scenes using Chrome MCP > Fact-check your content in real time with Perplexity MCP > Drop in your own photos and background music > Edit existing talking-head footage cut bloopers, add captions > Schedule posts to your socials straight from the terminal ▫️How to set it up (takes 5 minutes) : > Make sure you have Node.js installed ( node -v to check ) > Create a new Remotion project: npx create-video@latest Pick the Blank template, enable TailwindCSS, and install the Skills package when prompted. > Install dependencies: cd my-video npm install > Start the preview server: npm run dev > Open Claude Code in the same project folder: cd my-video claude That's it. You can now prompt videos in plain English. If you already have a Remotion project, just add the skill directly: npx skills add remotion-dev/skills This drops a SKILL.md into your project that gives Claude expert knowledge of Remotion.. animations, compositions, captions, assets, 3D content everything. Example prompt you can steal: "Create a 30-second 9:16 vertical video about the top 3 AI tools this week. Use animated text with a hook in the first 2 seconds. Add smooth transitions between scenes. Keep text in the safe zone for TikTok. Use a dark tech aesthetic with blue accent colors." Claude writes all the React code, renders a preview, you tweak with natural language, and export when ready. The crazy part is this whole pipeline is local, free (minus your Claude sub), and you never open a video editor. imo this kills CapCut for anyone making info-style content. You describe the video in English and get back a rendered MP4. try it now.

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

31,862 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🎉 Win one of 100 'digital' copies of the book "Rob Hubbard Master of Magic" 📚 This is the best read of 2024 - actually it's the best read I have had for a couple of years! 📖 If you are a Commodore 64 and Rob Hubbard fan, you will love this digital book, it's 350 pages, full colour, exhaustively researched details about Rob's Commodore 64 music and more. PLUS winners will receive access to 120Gb Rob Hubbard online media gallery - this is an amazing resource of videos, music and other content. 🎥🎵 This post's video is a selection of Rob Hubbard's Commodore 64 SID music, each 20 seconds long, have a listen, there will be some awesome memories stirred up. Winners will get access to the full length music in the 120Gb media gallery and much more. 🎶 How do you enter? 🤔 1️⃣ You must be a follower of Commodore Computer Museum 🕹 2️⃣ In the comments below name your favourite Rob Hubbard Commodore 64 game and why you like his SID music. (If you need to refresh your memory, watch this video) 🎮🎵 3️⃣ Promotion ends on the 18th July and winners will be contact by DM by the Commodore Computer Museum. ⏰ 4️⃣ Once all winners are contacted, name and email addresses will be compiled, and then the digital book (PDF) Rob Hubbard Master of Magic will be emailed by C64 Audio 📧 to valid winners, along with access to the 120Gb media library. 5️⃣ If less than 100 comments are made an additional promotion will be run, and the maximum number of winners from all promotions will be 100 copies of the digital book Rob Hubbard Master of Magic. 💯 is an amazing resource of Commodore 64 music and supporter of the retrogaming community. Check out the awesome Commodore 64 content on their website. 🔗 Please note: -Only one entry per person. -Winners will be selected at random from all valid entries. -The competition is open to followers of Commodore Computer Museum 🕹 -By entering, you agree to be bound by these terms and conditions.

Commodore Computer Museum 🕹

41,404 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

WIN 10,000$ 🚀 Officially announcing the 1of10 Grant for one aspiring YouTuber wanting to go full-time! You might have your life changed forever! Here’s what you get: - 10,000$ USD CASH - For 3 months, strategy calls every 2 weeks with the 1of10 Strategy team (worked on 1B+ views) whose goal will be to help you blow up and optimize your channel by doing those 1-on-1 calls Watch the video below to see the rules more in-depth! How To Win: Step 1 In the next 48 hours, by May 24th 2024, 11:00am EST/5pm CET, you need to do the following: - Link your channel below in the replies - Retweet this post - Follow me (Richard the Youtube strategist) and 1 of 10 Youtube Strategy to make sure to receive DM if you are selected How do we choose the winner: Step 2 From all the participants that follow the instructions above, the 1of10 team will choose 10 aspiring YouTubers. How do we select the 10? We will go through recent uploads, efforts put into the channel, quality of video uploads, upload frequency, originality, production value, educational value, growth potential, overall commitment to YouTube, etc. Step 3 10 very experienced judges will vote each for their top 3 they believe have the most potential of growth, regardless of the niche. Step 4 The one with the most votes will win 10K$ USD + guidance from me and my team for the next 3 months. The other 9 will win one consulting call with the 1of10 Strategy team and lifetime access to the 1of10 platform (1500$ value). My favorite question to ask everyone is “What is your dream?”. Riad and I are hoping with this grant, we can actually fulfill someone’s dream and follow the mission of 1of10 to increase quality content on the platform!! Don’t forget to link your channel below and retweet! Tag someone who you think could be a good fit! Good luck and if this goes well, we will run it again!

Richard the Youtube strategist

133,056 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The second edition of the Swordplay #SuperCoach Classic & Draft season guide is coming! Pre-order your copy today at the link below! The Swordplay 2026 #SuperCoach Preseason Guide is available for pre-order until Saturday February 21st 2026, when the guide will be released! If you pre-order, we will be providing the entire team by team preview to you with early access, from February 15th 2026, after which you will get access to the full guide on release date. For just $20, this 300 page+ season guide looks into each AFL team in detail, supplemented with discussions on popular players, as well as predictions for the top scorers on each line. Strategy wise, the Swordplay team along with an all star cast of content creators delves into how to pick the best starting team, ramifications of the new rules, tips for picking the best Captain weekly, breakout candidates and mid-price mayhem and a fixture analysis. At the end of this season guide, you will find a list of SuperCoach lingo which we as content creators use weekly, suitable for all levels of SuperCoach experience, new or seasoned. We also tap into the knowledge of 2024 SuperCoach winner Akashi (Joven May), the SCodFather (The SCodfather) as well as other creators you are most likely to be familiar with from Fantasy Take TV📺, The Coaches Panel, The Centre Bounce, Pig Mentality, Footy Mailbag, SuperCoach Edge, Steven Smith - SDS SuperCoach, Swiz26 and more! Developed by SuperCoach experts, this guide is suited for each level of SuperCoach player, whether this is your first season, a returning player looking for a personal best rank, or an experienced player looking for a top 1k finish. Here is a video outlining the guide, including a special offer for anyone wanting to advertise a business/venture within our Season Guide! You don't want to miss out! Use our promo code “SWORDPLAY” for 10% off your pre-order copy! Janath Fernando Rossco SuperCoach with DR Spillsy

Third Man Up

12,452 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

With the renewed interest in 9/11, there are a lot of people new to the demolition theory. People often don't realize a lot of things about Building 7, which collapsed from fires hours after the North Tower (WTC1) dropped tons of burning debris against its south side. This is the view from the north, composited with a later street scene shot from the same camera but at a wider angle, for scale. You don't see that damage on the south side, but you see other things. First, notice how tall the building is. The cropped version of this video makes it look like a squat and solid box. But in reality, it was relatively tall and slender. Then, notice the penthouse, on the left, full of heavy equipment, and directly over the column with the longest span bracing supports. The column that is most vulnerable to losing those supports is the one that is most vulnerable to thermal expansion. The supporting girders get longer from the heat, which breaks the connections at the ends. The longer the support, the larger the expansion. Popular videos often start later, so you don't see this hundreds-of-ton penthouse fall all the way through the building, gutting the east (left) side. The Penthouse fell exactly as it would if column 79 had failed near the bottom, which simulations show is most likely. Then notice you can see the sky through the windows on the top left. The building has been hollowed out, and the collapse is progressing to the right. We see the parapet on the right start to fall. Then the whole building collapses. We don't see what caused this, but the building was fast becoming an empty tube with no internal bracing. The exterior was "moment resisting," so it held together like a sheet, but it buckled at the base. Once one column goes, the load is instantly transferred to others, and the collapse zips around the building. A buckled column is still steel, still gives tons of support. But the mass above it needs HUNDREDS of tons, so initially the fall is 99% of freefall, indistinguishable on this low resolution video. It falls in the direction of gravity, but the most damaged columns are in the south, so it tips a bit in that direction.

Mick West

20,717 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"George Knapp and I provided that list (of 46 videos) to Congress." ~JC What's it Gonna Take to Wake the Masses? Full segment with Biden, Obama and Trump comments. Trump: "They wanna find out about the UFOs, and anything having to do with UFO or related material. And we're gonna be releasing a lot of things from...that we have. And I think some of it's gonna be very interesting to people." ~ Peter Doocy in Studio: "Many historic developments in a story that I've been working on for five years, but our next guest has been working on for much longer. So, let's start here. My interest was piqued when Barack Obama said this in 2021." Obama on The Late Show with James Corden: "When it comes to aliens, there are some things I just can't tell you, on air." ~ Doocy in Studio: "I was so curious about that, so I asked the only man I knew, at the time, who could possibly help." ~ Doocy: "President Obama says that there is footage and records of objects in the skies, these Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon. And he says, we don't know exactly what they are. What do you think that it is?" Biden: "I would ask him again. Thank you." (A pathetic response that I called out at the time. Maybe I have BDS? 😵‍💫 ) ~ Doocy in Studio: "Not very helpful, Joe! I haven't had a chance to ask Barack Obama, and it had been eating at me. And then, he said something else." ~ Brian Tyler Cohen (BTC): "Are aliens real?" Obama: "Uh, they're real, but I haven't seen 'em, and they're not being kept in, uh... What is it?" BTC: "Area 51?" Obama: "Area 51." ~ Doocy in Studio: "If the last President couldn't help us with answers about aliens, maybe this one could. Spoiler alert, he did." ~ Doocy on Air Force One: "Barack Obama said that aliens are real. Have you seen any evidence of non-human visitors to Earth?" Trump: "Well he gave classified information, he's not supposed to be doing that. You know." Doocy: "So aliens are real?" Trump: "Well I don't know if they're real or not, I can tell you he gave classified information." ~ Doocy: "Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell is an investigative journalist and the co-host of the 'Weaponized' podcast. He knows more about this than anybody. And the new movie about him, 'Sleeping Dog' and UFO disclosure, is excellent, I watched it yesterday. "Jeremy, there are 46 videos that Congress wants the Pentagon to declassify. The Pentagon missed the deadline to do it. But, will these 46 videos be convincing enough to have Americans saying, 'I have no doubts aliens have visited Earth'"? Corbell: "You know, I think that these are data points. I think these 46 videos are really important. I think the American public should be able to see them, and so does Congress. They specifically identified these 46 videos because they know that these videos exist. They are designated UAP by our own military and intelligence services. I have been exposed to a number of these. In fact, George Knapp and I provided that list to Congress. We've actually released some of those videos. So, the American public is ready for this. "Now what it's gonna tell us, what the end result is gonna be? It's another data set of footage the American public can look at. But here is what I know for a fact, Peter: There are machines, there are craft of unknown origin that fly with impunity in our restricted airspace, and our government has been assessing this as a national threat for decades. The jig is up. People now know: UAP are real. "But what are UAP? Who are flying these machines. Who made these machines that can outpace, outmaneuver and outperform our greatest war fighters? That's the question." Doocy: "And so, you were just talking about this. We've got video that we can put up on the screen. One of the videos that your sources helped you guys get out of a government vault." (Important detail: Corbell and Knapp have sources. Their source, or sources, somehow acquired that video (and others), Corbell and Knapp obtained it from said source(s), and then released it.) Doocy: "It is a UAP over Syria in 2021 flying at an impossible speed, demonstrating instantaneous acceleration. This is the video. A lot of people will look at this and say, 'Well, it could be China, it could be Russia, it could be somebody else.' But when you see this and the other videos - some of the 45 other videos that you have seen - what do you think?" Corbell: "Yeah, look, we do not have the capability, unfortunately, for instantaneous motion. The idea of inertial effect and what would happen, this is baffling to the intelligence community." (Here's where I push back. This is from November of 2025 on "Weaponized," where the head of the AAWSAP UFO program (2008-2010), James Lacatski, was interviewed. Corbell: "We hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value." Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent." (How far did they get? To 80% of the full extent of what alleged NHI craft can do? 90%? Was the ability to accelerate instantaneously achieved? We don't know. Commander Will Miler (Ret.) has said that he had a friend who worked at Area 51 and that friend suggested that we have craft that can do, "Mach 9 and then suddenly make a right-angle turn.") ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~~~ Corbell: "What George and I put out, it is their analysis that this is demonstrating, this craft, which is not aerodynamic. When you look at this video, it instantaneously shoots off to the right, once the Reaper drone got a weapons-grade lock on it. So its ability to maneuver is far beyond anything that China, Russia or the U.S. has." (When I look at UAP videos, I try to see them through the eyes of an open-minded skeptic. I have several coworkers who fit that bill and I show them videos when they're released to get their take. I think the 2021 video from Syria (I'll link to a more complete version of it in the replies) is important because it appears to be demonstrating instantaneous acceleration. But when I showed that video to those coworkers of mine, they were not impressed. It's not clear or close enough. If the rest of the 46 videos are like that, I don't see it jolting the masses awake (which we really need) about the seriousness of this topic. Then again, maybe so many videos being declassified may do the trick? Also, WHO in our government has labeled those objects in the videos as UAP? That's important to know. Was it just the guys from the UAP Task Force?) Corbell: "Look, this is a known secret on the inside. It's an open secret that UAP are real and that they're able to evade, sometimes detection, but absolutely our weaponry. And it's an issue because they are oftentimes loitering over sensitive, critical infrastructure within the United States. This is not me saying this. This has been admitted by our own administration and government. I think we're closer than ever. The intent is to bring the truth forward to the American public. We are closer than ever, and it's just gotta be done now." Doocy: "And my last question, we have two minutes left in the show: You've reported that some of these UFO files, for generations. have been kept secret even from sitting presidents. Who would have the power in this country to decide, if not the President, that the American people don't have a right to know about something so important, like UFOs?" Corbell: "Right. This is game-changing, and it's nature itself. It's not something that should be held back. And presidents have admitted that they have been held out from that information. Very famously, President Clinton talked about that. Not the first time, he said, a president has been lied to." Related Bill Clinton Clip: "If the U.S. Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn't tell me about it, either, and I wanna know." ~Clinton ~ Corbell: "Well now the pressure is on. Congress is asking for these 46 videos, and if we've ever had an administration and a president that sees the public interest and would enact upon that for the people, it would be this sitting president. So I'm very encouraged at this moment, we have an opportunity." (I'll be encouraged if Trump actually signs an Executive Order calling for the declassification of UFO videos and records.) Corbell: "None of these have really been announcements. It's an opportunity now for the American public to understand the UFO presence is real and that it's been going on a long time, and it has been of national security concern." Doocy: "And we have less than a minute left in the show, but we asked our audience if they had questions for you, and Lena sent one in. She wants to know, 'Are they" - presumably aliens - "walking around right now and we don't know it?" Corbell: "Yeah, so, if we don't get past the first question, we don't get past the first acknowledgement, we're never gonna know the interaction that whoever these pilots are of these craft of unknown origin, that they believe do not originate here on Earth. If we don't get past that first question, we're never gonna be able to answer that question (laughs)." Doocy: "Well, we've been trying to make this happen for a long time. Jeremy, thank you so much for being here. This is a story that we will keep asking about at the highest levels of government. So thank you." Corbell: "Yeah, I encourage people to watch the film, 'Sleeping Dog' that's coming out, because it does dive into investigative journalism on this, [and] how much progress we've made." Doocy: "And we will watch. That's all we got. I'm Peter Doocy in Washington. See you next time."

Joe Murgia

11,486 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dogs and wolves split apart at least 15,000 years ago. Then a golden retriever met a wolf pup, and did something his own owner says terrified him. 97 seconds. Sound on. Watch the video BEFORE you read another word. Then come back. I'll show you why this clip is stranger, and far more important, than it looks. (Long read. Bookmark it now. You'll want it later.) . I'm not going to tell you what happens in that video. Not one spoiler. Not a hint. Because the video does its own work, and it does it better than any caption I could write. What I can do is show you the invisible layer underneath it. The biology. The history. The 15,000 years of evolution that were supposed to make a moment like this impossible. When you press play, you are not watching two animals. You are watching two completely different answers to the same question, standing in the same yard. The question is: what does a creature do when it loves something it was never built to keep? Read on. Then watch again. It will hit differently the second time. I guarantee it. . PART 1. THE SPLIT Let's start with the number that should bother you. Fifteen thousand years. Possibly forty thousand. Scientists still argue about the exact date, and they argue loudly. Somewhere in that window, a population of ancient wolves, one that no longer exists anywhere on Earth, forked into two paths. One path led to the wolf you know from documentaries. Wary. Silent in the trees. Built to survive without us. The other path led to the animal sleeping on your couch. Here's what almost nobody realizes: your dog did not descend from the modern gray wolf. Both descend from a shared ancestor that vanished. Dogs and wolves are less like parent and child, more like cousins who grew up in different countries and stopped speaking the same language. And yet their DNA is almost identical. Different by a sliver. They can even interbreed and produce fertile offspring. Biologically, the gap between them is tiny. Behaviorally, the gap is an ocean. In 2017, a Princeton-led team compared the genomes of dogs and wolves and found something eerie. Dogs carry differences in a region of the genome that, in humans, is linked to Williams-Beuren syndrome. It's a condition famous for one trait above all others: extreme, almost unstoppable friendliness. Researchers are still debating what it means. But the idea is staggering. Dogs may not just be tamer wolves. They may be wolves with a dial turned all the way up on one thing: wanting to be near us. Wolves never got that dial. Hold that thought. It matters more than you think. . PART 2. THE DOG WHO WAS BUILT TO BE GENTLE Now meet the golden retriever. He wasn't found in nature. He was designed. In the mid-1800s, on a vast estate in the Scottish Highlands, a wealthy lord named Dudley Marjoribanks set out to create the perfect gundog. A dog that would swim into cold water, find a fallen bird, and bring it back to the hunter without leaving a single tooth mark on it. Read that again. The defining feature of a golden retriever is what breeders call a soft mouth. A dog that can carry something fragile, something alive or nearly alive, in its jaws, and not crush it. For generations, the goldens who were gentlest got to breed. The ones who were rough didn't. Think about what that does over 150 years. You are not just selecting for a coat color or a size. You are selecting, again and again, for restraint. For an animal that has power in its jaws and chooses not to use it. Today the golden retriever guides the blind. Sits with the dying. Finds people buried under rubble. Walks into hospital rooms and lowers a blood pressure reading just by resting its head on a bed. We took a predator and, over centuries, we bred one question out of it: should I hurt this thing? The golden's answer is almost always no. Now here's the part I can't stop thinking about. That gentleness was never aimed at a wolf. It was bred for birds. For children. For us. So what happens when an animal engineered for tenderness meets an animal that was never engineered for anything, one that is still, in every cell, exactly what the wild made it? That's the video. Go watch it if you haven't. I'll be here. . PART 3. THE ANIMAL THAT WAS NEVER ASKED A wolf pup is born blind and deaf. It weighs about a pound. For its first weeks it knows three things: warmth, milk, and the smell of the pack. Its eyes open at around two weeks, and they are blue. They will change to gold or amber within the first months of life, like a color being poured in slowly. In the wild, that pup is raised by an entire family. Mother, father, older siblings, all of them feeding, guarding, teaching. Forget the "alpha wolf" myth you were taught. The biologist who popularized that term, David Mech, spent decades correcting himself. A wild pack is not a gang with a boss. It's a family. A breeding pair and their kids. Which means a wolf pup's entire universe is built around one idea: the pack is everything. Now think about what it means when that universe collapses. Here's the hard science on why wolves aren't dogs, even when humans raise them from the earliest days. Researchers who want socialized wolves take pups from the den at around ten days old and hand-raise them around the clock. Bottle. Warmth. Constant human contact. It's the closest thing to a perfect human upbringing a wolf can get. In a famous 2003 experiment in Hungary, scientists gave hand-raised wolves and ordinary dogs an impossible puzzle: food locked in a box that couldn't be opened. The dogs did something instantly recognizable. They turned around and looked at the nearest human. Straight at the face. Help me. The wolves, raised by humans since they were days old, looked at people far less. They kept working the problem alone. Let that sink in. Same upbringing. Same people. Same room. And still: one animal looks to us for help by instinct, and the other doesn't think to. That's the dial I mentioned. It isn't something you can install with love and a bottle. It took thousands of years of living beside us. There's a legendary experiment that proves how deep this goes. In 1959, in Siberia, a geneticist named Dmitri Belyaev started breeding silver foxes. He selected for exactly one trait: tameness. Nothing else. No looks, no size, no color. Within a handful of generations, the foxes started wagging their tails. Licking hands. Whining when humans left. Then something nobody asked for started happening. Floppy ears. Curly tails. Piebald coats. Foxes that looked like puppies. Pick for friendliness alone, and a whole different animal surfaces. It took decades of careful selection to make a fox that wants us. Which brings me to the question that makes this video so unsettling. If wanting a human is a trait that takes generations to build, what happens when an animal WITHOUT it forms a bond anyway? And who is that bond really with? . PART 4. THE NOSE THAT READS THE FUTURE Before I say another word about the video, let me tell you about the most underrated superpower in the animal kingdom. You have about six million scent receptors in your nose. A dog has around three hundred million. The part of a dog's brain that processes smell is, proportionally, dozens of times larger than yours. Dogs can detect certain odors at parts per trillion. Picture spotting a teaspoon of sugar dissolved in two Olympic swimming pools. But smell isn't the interesting part. The interesting part is what a dog smells ABOUT YOU. In 2022, researchers at Queen's University Belfast collected breath and sweat samples from people before and after they did stressful math tests. Then they trained dogs to tell the samples apart. The dogs picked out the stressed samples correctly about 94 percent of the time. Your dog can smell your cortisol. Your fear. Your dread. And here's the thing. You don't have to say anything. You don't have to cry. You can hold a perfectly calm face while your body chemistry is screaming. Now add routine. Dogs are pattern-recognition machines. They know what your keys sound like, what a suitcase means, which shoes you wear when you're leaving for an hour and which shoes you wear when you're leaving for good. Neuroscientist Gregory Berns put dogs in brain scanners and found that the reward center of a dog's brain lit up most strongly for the scent of a familiar person. Not a stranger. Not another dog. The person they loved. So when I tell you a dog can KNOW something is coming before anyone speaks, I'm not being poetic. I'm describing chemistry, memory, and pattern, running in parallel, faster than you can think. There's a moment in this video where you'll understand this section in your bones. I won't tell you when it is. You'll feel it. . PART 5. THE EYES Here is a fact that rewires how you see your own dog. In 2015, a Japanese team published a study in Science that stopped a lot of people cold. They found that when a dog and its owner look into each other's eyes, both of them get a surge of oxytocin. The bonding hormone. The same one that floods a new mother when she looks at her baby. A loop. Dog looks at you, your oxytocin rises, you look back, the dog's rises. Two nervous systems tuning to each other through nothing but a stare. And here's the twist that gives me chills. The same team tried it with hand-raised wolves and their human caretakers. The loop didn't form. The wolves didn't hold the gaze the same way. The humans didn't get the same hormone hit. Something that comes naturally between a dog and a person simply wasn't there. It gets stranger. In 2019, researchers published a paper in PNAS showing that dogs have a tiny facial muscle above the inner corner of the eyes that wolves essentially lack. It's the muscle that lifts the inner eyebrow. It's what creates the "puppy eyes" look that makes you feel something you can't argue with. A muscle. Evolved, apparently, for one audience: us. Shelter research backs it up. Dogs that make that expression more often tend to get adopted faster. Dogs learned to speak human with their faces. So eye contact, for a dog, is not a small thing. It's the deepest sentence in the language they invented for us. Which is why, when you watch this video, I want you to pay attention to something most people miss the first time. Watch the eyes. Watch who looks at whom. Watch who doesn't. Because in the dog's language, refusing to look at someone you love is one of the loudest things you can say. . PART 6. THE BOWL Ask any dog behaviorist what the ultimate test of trust between two canines is, and you'll hear the same word. Food. Resource guarding is one of the oldest, most primal instincts a dog has. Food is survival. A dog that doesn't defend its meal was, for most of history, a dog that didn't make it. Growls over a bone are not rudeness. They are ancient math. So the bowl is sacred. In a home with two dogs, watch who eats first, who eats faster, who stands too close, who gets a warning stare. A shared bowl between two animals is a peace treaty signed in kibble. Some dogs will happily share toys, beds, even the couch, and still lock up the moment a bowl hits the floor. Some never share it. Not once. Not with anyone. Now put a wolf pup in that picture. A wolf pup that has known real hunger. Or no mother at all. Or no pack. That's an animal for whom food is not a snack. It's a verdict on whether the world is safe. And put a dog who has never, ever shared his food in that same room. I'm not going to tell you what happens next. But when you get to that moment in the video, and you will know it when you see it, remember this section. Remember what the bowl means. . Pause for a second, because a pattern is forming. Smell tells a dog what's coming. Eyes tell him who matters. The bowl tells him who's safe. Play tells him who's family. Four separate systems, one conclusion, and it's the same conclusion every time. You now know how to read the language. All that's left is to watch someone speak it, with everything on the line. . PART 7. THE GRIEF NOBODY BELIEVED IN For most of the twentieth century, serious scientists were warned not to say that animals feel grief. The word for the sin was anthropomorphism. Projecting human feelings onto beasts. You could lose credibility for even suggesting it. And then the data started rolling in. In 1925, a Tokyo professor named Hidesaburo Ueno died suddenly at work. His Akita, Hachiko, who had walked him to Shibuya Station every morning and met him at the platform every evening, showed up at the station the next day. And the next. For nine years, nine months, and fifteen days. Every single evening. Until his own death in 1935. The Japanese made a statue. The world made movies. But the scientists stayed cautious. One dog. Could be habit. Then in 2022, a team in Italy studied hundreds of multi-dog households where one dog had died. Owners reported that the surviving dogs changed. They sought more attention. They played less. They were less active. Many showed sleep and appetite changes. Not proof of grief exactly as we feel it. Scientists are still honest about that gap. But proof that the loss of a companion reshapes a dog's whole behavior. Here's the honest version, and I'll give you both sides: skeptics say we can't know what a dog feels inside. That's fair. We can't. We can only observe behavior, hormones, brain activity. But if a dog changes when a friend disappears, then that friend was never "just another animal" to him. Which raises the question the video quietly asks: What happens when a dog can see the loss coming? Not after. Before. Does the grief start early? Watch and decide for yourself. . PART 8. PLAY IS A CONTRACT Every canine on Earth speaks one shared language of play, and it's older than domestication itself. It starts with a bow. Front legs down, rear end up, tail high. The famous play bow. Researchers, especially the biologist Marc Bekoff, spent years studying it and found that it works like a punctuation mark. It means: everything I do after this is a game. If I bite, it's not a real bite. If I pounce, it's not an attack. It's a contract. And here's the wild part: wolves use it. Foxes use it. Coyotes use it. Dogs use it. The signal predates the split I told you about in Part 1. Which means a dog and a wolf can meet, with 15,000 years of divergence between them, and still understand each other's opening move. It gets deeper. Play is a negotiation between unequals. A big dog playing with a smaller one will often hold back. Roll over. Let the little one "win." Researchers call it self-handicapping. It's the animal version of a father lifting his daughter onto his shoulders and letting her win the race. And they role-reverse. The chaser becomes the chased. The one on top ends up underneath. That only happens if both animals believe the other is safe. Play, in the animal kingdom, is the most honest test of trust there is. Nobody can fake it. You can't roleplay tenderness with a body that has fangs. You either mean it, or the game collapses in seconds. And it changes as the years go on. Puppies play like puppies. Then they grow. Their size changes. Their strength changes. Their jaws change. The game has to change with them, or it ends. Some friendships don't survive that. Some survive by getting more careful, more precise, more competitive, and somehow more loving at the same time. The end of this video is a masterclass in that. I'll leave it there. . PART 9. THE HARDEST KIND OF LOVE Now the uncomfortable part. The part the internet often skips. Wolves are not pets. Say it out loud and it sounds obvious. But every year, people fall in love with the idea of a wolf, and every year the story ends badly for the animal. A wolf is built to cover up to thirty miles in a day. To live in a family of its own kind. To communicate with howls that carry for miles. Its jaws, its instincts, its stress responses, its needs are those of a wild animal. A house cannot hold that. A backyard cannot hold that. Love, however genuine, is not a substitute for what a wolf actually needs. And here's the tragic loop wildlife rescuers talk about: an orphaned wolf pup that grows up around humans is often too habituated to ever be released. It didn't learn what its mother would have taught it. It doesn't fear what it should fear. So the "rescue" can't end in the forest. It has to end somewhere in between. Somewhere that isn't the wild and isn't a living room. A place built for what this animal is. That's where the real story lives. Not in the rescue. In the decision after. Because the hardest thing in the world isn't loving something. It's loving something enough to hand it to the people who can give it the life it needs, and then living with the hole that leaves. People get torn apart over decisions like that. Not because they didn't love the animal. Because they did. Sometimes the most loving act looks exactly like loss. And here is what stopped me. The human in this story wasn't the only one who understood that. Somebody else in that story understood it too. Somebody with four legs and no ability to speak. I won't say who. I won't say how. Just watch. . PART 10. WHY YOUR CHEST TIGHTENS Have you noticed something strange about videos like this? They don't make you sad exactly. They make you feel something warmer. A tightness in the chest. Goosebumps on your arms. Sometimes a sudden hot wetness at the corners of your eyes, and you don't know why. Psychologists have a name for it now. Kama muta. It's Sanskrit for "moved by love." The researcher who helped define it, Alan Fiske, argues that it's triggered by one specific thing: the sudden intensification of a bond. A reunion. A reconciliation. A loyalty proven under pressure. A stranger becoming family. That moment when two beings who could have stayed apart choose each other anyway. Across cultures and languages, the physical signature keeps showing up: chills, tears, warmth in the chest, a lump in the throat. It isn't sadness. It isn't happiness. It's the feeling of witnessing connection get stronger. Another psychologist, Jonathan Haidt, calls a cousin of it moral elevation. That warm lift you feel when you watch someone do something unexpectedly good. It makes you want to be better. Kinder. It literally makes people more likely to help others afterward. So why do animals trigger it so powerfully? Because animals strip out everything we distrust in human stories. No agenda. No performance. No PR. No "what's in it for me." A dog can't fake loyalty for likes. A wolf can't pretend to love you for status. When two animals from opposite ends of evolution choose each other, we're watching the purest version of the thing we hunger for in our own lives, in a form we can trust. That's why you'll feel it. That's why you'll want to show it to someone right after. And that's why the algorithm will keep showing it to you. . PART 11. SIXTEEN FACTS THAT WILL CHANGE HOW YOU SEE THIS CLIP FACT 1. For every wild wolf on Earth, there are thousands of dogs. One branch of the family tree took over the planet by befriending us. The other stayed wild and stayed rare. FACT 2. Wolf pups are born with blue eyes. Adult wolves usually have gold or amber. Nobody sees the change happen. It just does. FACT 3. Wolves rarely bark. Barking is mostly a dog invention, and one theory says it evolved largely to talk to humans. FACT 4. A dog's tail wag isn't just "happy." Research suggests a wag skewed to the right side tends to signal approach and comfort, and one skewed to the left signals hesitation or stress. A dog is broadcasting its mood in code, and you were never taught to read it. FACT 5. Dogs catch human yawns. Wolves catch yawns from each other, and more so from the ones they're closest to. Contagious yawning tracks emotional closeness, not just habit. FACT 6. A wolf can eat up to twenty pounds of meat in one sitting. Then not eat properly for days. Feast and famine is written into its body. FACT 7. In a dog's brain, praise only lights up the reward center when BOTH the words and the tone are right. Say "good boy" in a flat voice and it doesn't fully land. Dogs process what you say and how you say it separately, then combine them. FACT 8. A wild wolf lives roughly six to eight years. A golden retriever lives ten to twelve. One of them is built for hardship. The other is built for company. FACT 9. Dogs combine faces and voices to read emotion. In one study, dogs shown two human faces while hearing a voice looked longer at the face whose emotion matched the sound. FACT 10. A border collie named Chaser learned the names of more than 1,000 toys, and could pick out a brand-new one by pure elimination. That's reasoning, not tricks. FACT 11. Wolves in a wild pack are a family, not an army. The pups eat, the parents hunt, the older siblings babysit. The word "alpha" mostly belongs to captive wolves forced together, not wild ones. FACT 12. A dog's nose print is as unique as a human fingerprint. So is its bond with you. FACT 13. Dogs hear frequencies far above what you can, up to roughly 45,000 Hz and beyond. The world around you is full of sound they can't stop noticing. FACT 14. A wolf's paw print can be nearly five inches long. Bigger than most dogs' prints. Yet the golden retriever's heart, by any measure that matters, is not smaller. FACT 15. Dogs dream. They go through REM sleep just like you. The twitching, the tiny barks, the running paws: it's a brain replaying its day. FACT 16. The wolf is the ancestor of the dog only in the loosest sense. Both come from a wolf lineage that no longer exists. When you watch these two, you are watching an ancient family reunion between two branches that lost touch before recorded history. . PART 12. HOW TO WATCH IT (WITHOUT ME SPOILING IT) You've made it this far, which tells me one thing about you. You're not a scroller. You're a noticer. So here's how to watch this clip like someone who knows what they're looking at. FIRST WATCH. Just feel it. Don't analyze. Let the story run at its own speed. The clip is under two minutes and it doesn't waste a second. SECOND WATCH. Focus on distance. Notice how close the animals stand. How that changes. How it never quite changes the way you expect. THIRD WATCH. Focus on the dog. Only the dog. Not what he does. What he refuses to do. FOURTH WATCH. Focus on the ears and the tail. Everything a dog can't say, he says with those two things. And he says a lot. And the last five seconds? Do not skip them. Do not scroll early. Watch the final image and ask yourself one question: If this is what the two of them look like now, what did it cost to get here? . CLOSING. WHY THIS MATTERS MORE THAN A "CUTE VIDEO" Let me leave you with the thought that made me write all of this. We live in a world that constantly tells us bonds are transactional. That loyalty is naive. That people, and animals, only love you when you're useful. Then along comes a story like this, and it quietly breaks that theory. A dog engineered for gentleness. A wolf engineered by nothing but the wild. Fifteen thousand years of evolution between them, a wall of biology that says they should be strangers, or worse. And instead: a bond so strong that the humans standing around it were afraid of what it would cost. Not because anyone was in danger. Because one of them understood exactly what was at stake. That's the thing about animals. They don't need the science. They don't need Part 1 through Part 12. They don't know about oxytocin loops or kama muta or play bows. They just know who matters. And they act on it, immediately, with everything they've got. Maybe that's the real reason this kind of video travels the way it does. Not because it's cute. Because it reminds us of a level of loyalty we've quietly stopped expecting from each other. So do these three things. ONE. Go watch the video. All 97 seconds. Sound on. TWO. Come back and reply with the exact moment you felt it. I want the second, the caption, the look. Tell me where it got you. THREE. Send it to one person who needs to see what love looks like when nobody is performing it. You know who. Repost this if the video moved you. Follow me for more stories where science and animals collide. And remember the question from the top of this post, because now you can answer it. What does a creature do when it loves something it was never built to keep? If you watched carefully, you already know. If you didn't, go back. The answer is in the last frame.

Earth Unveiled

50,253 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

🚨FOLLOW-UP BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's Defense STILL Skipping KEY Evidence – Is the Fix In Deeper Than We Thought? 😱 Remember my last post exposing the MASSIVE conflict in Tyler's trial? Michael Burt – lead defense attorney – is COUSIN to Terryl Farnsworth, the TPUSA AV insider caught tampering with SD cards and contaminating Charlie Kirk's stage right after the hit. That's a GLARING conflict of interest that screams setup. How can Tyler get a fair shot when his lawyer's family is tied to suspects with direct access? Now, BIG breakthrough from HolonCitizen's latest video: The defense's discovery list is STILL ignoring CRITICAL federal-level evidence that could BLOW THIS CASE WIDE OPEN and potentially ACQUIT Tyler! From the original discovery (as I covered) to this updated analysis – they're requesting "pedestrian" local stuff like basic witness statements... but NOTHING that pulls from the FBI's powerhouse tools. Here's what's MISSING (and why it matters): NO 302 Reports: These are FBI's detailed interview summaries – the goldmine of federal intel. Other high-profile cases pull them ALL THE TIME to uncover hidden details. Why skip? These could reveal witness accounts blocked by FBI directives (police radio record show FBI ordered local LE NOT to interview witnesses on Day 1 – only a handful followed up out of 3,000 people there). NO Cell Tower Data/Pings: FBI has "magic" powers here – tracking EVERYONE'S movements (even without calls/texts) down to 10 feet, for months. Could map out accomplices, rental cars from airports, visits to Tyler's apartment night before, key spots around UVU. In similar cases, defense uses this to PROVE multiple actors. Here? Crickets. Stuck at Local Level: Analogy to 1960s Dallas case (JFK vibes) – keeping it local avoids elevating to federal conspiracy if multiple people involved. If defense pulled federal data, it could force the case up, exposing "men in white suits" (higher-level players) and making invisible evidence visible. If the defense was TRULY fighting to ACQUIT Tyler – charged with murder, NOT attempted – they'd hammer this stuff to show OTHERS caused the death (e.g., second shooter, mic blast, blanks from Tyler). Prosecution's "lone wolf" narrative crumbles, Tyler walks FREE. But with Burt's family ties to Farnsworth (and Farnsworth's father-in-law Tom Burt's Duncan Aviation links to those Egyptian planes and rental cars)? They're NOT doing it. This isn't incompetence – it's a pattern that keeps the real story buried. Demand Michael Burt RECUSE for this blatant conflict. Demand FULL federal discovery – 302s, cell data, ALL of it. Tyler's no saint, but he deserves a REAL defense, not a railroad job. Charlie's truth demands we keep digging. Share if you're outraged – tag Candace Owens, lawyers, patriots. Let's make 2026 the year the cover-up cracks! 🇺🇸💥 Be sure to FOLLOW my bro HolonCitizen and go watch series of videos exposing these GLARING deficiencies.

Project Constitution

304,452 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten