正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Silver's squeeze is being driven by gold which in turn is being driven by the dollar. No, not "debasement" or "inflation." Eurodollar deflation. People make the critical mistake believing gold is a substitute for the dollar when it's not even in the same arena. Precious metals instead compete with...

26,897 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 THIS IS NOT NORMAL Look at what China has quietly done: U.S. TREASURIES: 28.2% → 6.8% GOLD: 1,054t → 2,387t And China has now bought gold for 22 consecutive months. Now ask yourself one question: WHY IS ALL OF THIS HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME? And buying gold was only step one. Now China is adding the vaults, clearing, settlement, yuan contracts and payment rails around it: - Hong Kong launched a government-backed gold clearing system linked directly to the Shanghai Gold Exchange. - It is expanding gold storage beyond 2,000 tonnes and exploring physically settled RMB gold futures That is what changes the entire equation. China does NOT need the yuan to replace the dollar. It only needs to make the dollar LESS NECESSARY. Because if another country gets paid in yuan, there has always been one obvious problem: What does it do with the yuan afterward? China is increasingly building another answer: TURN IT INTO GOLD. 1) Trade with China in yuan. 2) Settle without the dollar. 3) Move the proceeds into physical gold. 4) Store and clear that gold through Chinese-linked infrastructure. And if more countries start using the same rails, this stops being a story about the price of gold. It becomes a story about the dollar being needed for fewer transactions. Save this tweet. When the monetary system looks different five years from now, people will look back at these two charts and wonder how they missed what was happening in plain sight. Remember, I’ve been trading markets for over 15 years. I follow what central banks, governments and the biggest institutions are doing in real time, and when I see something important developing, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

220,455 次观看 • 4 天前

More sophistry and revisionist history from Mike Green. He claims: "Money exists to cancel debt. That's all it does. That's what it says on your dollar bill. This is legal tender for settlement of debts both public and private. It continues to function in that manner. It never stopped functioning in that manner. That is what it does. That's what it's supposed to do. It's not meant to store value. It's not meant to retain its value. It doesn't say that on there. There's no statement on your dollar bill that says this is good for three cowhides, right? It says this is for the settlement of debts, public and private." -------------------- His statements would only be sensible to someone who thinks money has been fiat for all of time. However, his claims are ahistorical (a word Green likes to use himself). Paper money was introduced as a representation of a specific amount of precious metal. Dollar bills once stated exactly how much silver or gold they were redeemable for. When the Coinage Act of 1792 was passed (and all the way up to 1971), you would have been laughed out of the room if you stated that "all money does is cancel debt." In fact, even after 1971, you would have been laughed at for claiming this, because Nixon's suspension of gold convertibility was "temporary," of course. When money was a specific representation of gold and silver, it DID store value. Of course paper money never stated that it can be exchanged for three cowhides. But when dollars stated exactly how much precious metal they were redeemable for, citizens KNEW that the underlying precious metal stored value over time. This is why the fiat rug-pull happened over many decades rather than overnight (central banking --> gold seizure --> "temporary" removal of gold convertibility --> fiat money). The best defense of Mike Green's claims are that they apply to the nature of fiat money TODAY. But Green leaves out that, historically (while competing monetary theories did exist), people correctly treated gold/silver-backed money as a store of value. Money DID store value. Everyone knew this to be true, and wanted it to be true (except banks and governments).

John Haar

10,393 次观看 • 4 个月前

Gold since April 2025: +60% Bitcoin since April 2025: -30% Gold since its January high: still near all-time highs. Bitcoin since its October high: -48%. 5 consecutive red months for Bitcoin. A 0.55 correlation with the S&P 500 as of March 1st. And people still call it "digital gold." Let me explain why that framing will cost you money: When the Middle East escalated, gold surged above $5,300. Bitcoin dropped. When equities sold off, gold held. Bitcoin sold with them. When uncertainty spiked, gold hit all-time highs. Bitcoin bled. This isn't an accident. It's the nature of WHAT these assets actually are. Gold is an asset that isn't somebody else's liability. It's not correlated with the general level of risk assets. It doesn't shift identities depending on what the market needs it to be that week. Bitcoin does. Sometimes it's digital gold. Sometimes it's correlated to NASDAQ. Sometimes it follows the dollar. Sometimes it follows liquidity. It depends on whatever narrative is convenient at the time. And narrative always follows price. That's the way it works. When Bitcoin was ripping to $126,000 in October, everyone called it a store of value. Now that it's trading at $66,000 with 5 red months, NOBODY talks about the digital gold thesis anymore. Gold doesn't have that problem. Central banks bought 863 tonnes of gold in 2025. Accumulating at the fastest pace in decades. China is buying like crazy for months. Nobody's buying Bitcoin for their sovereign reserves. Nobody's rewriting the gold thesis every quarter. I said this on back in April last year when Bitcoin was reclaiming $90,000 and everyone wanted me to be bullish on crypto: "If NASDAQ takes a header, if risk assets take another leg down, you want to bet Bitcoin goes up or down? I'd vote down." NASDAQ took a header. Risk assets took a leg down. Bitcoin went down. Gold went up. It's not complicated. Gold is insurance against irresponsible policies from central bankers and government officials. It protects you against the falling dollar. It's been doing this for 5,000 years. Bitcoin is a speculative instrument that acts like protection only when everything else is going up too. And in the environment we're heading into (geopolitical risk at generational highs, the dollar under pressure, central banks still buying, the Fed boxed in on rates) you want the real thing. Not the imitation. GOLD SURVIVED EMPIRES BITCOIN SURVIVED TWITTER

George Noble

11,852 次观看 • 6 个月前

Keep your hands off our gold “In the rush to hoard stuff for a rainy day, there’s been scant discussion about the future of our existing mineral stockpile; the 80 tonnes of gold the Reserve Bank of Australia has sitting in vaults. The rapid surge in gold prices means the value of the RBA’s gold has doubled in Australian dollar terms over the past two years and more than tripled over the past seven years. Which makes it a great time to sell those 80 tonnes of gold for just over $18 billion of cash. The analogy extends to physical capital; what’s the point of having a gold stockpile if you never sell it?” ••••••••••••••• The AFR (no doubt acting as a proxy for Treasury) is arguing that Australia should sell its gold. This is a very dangerous thing to do. Some time in the future the U.S. dollar will stop being the world’s reserve currency and there will be reset of the monetary system. It’s highly likely that when this happens the new currency will be backed by gold. Those countries with the largest gold reserves will in the strongest financial position after reset. Gold is an appreciating asset, unlike bonds which depreciate due to inflation. That’s why central banks manipulate the gold price by artificially shorting it via paper contracts on the Comex to prevent individuals from accumulating it. Let’s not forget the U.S. outlawed the possession of gold in 1932 to prop up the paper markets. Articles like this remind us that the world’s financial system is on very shaky ground. Western government debt levels are unsustainable and the bond markets are on very shaky ground. Gold has always been insurance against reckless government spending/borrowing. Rather than sell our gold, the Australian government should be accumulating it. Any attempt by central banks to take our gold needs to be stopped stone cold dead. That includes bringing our gold back home, away from the clutches of the Bank of England.

Gerard Rennick

23,880 次观看 • 4 个月前

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on the death of the dollar 💵☠️ "we're in a stealth bull market in the dollar... [but] the bad news is there's a new monetary system coming" "I've always been of the opinion the dollar is going to fail up... Then they reset stuff" "The dollar system is designed for constant credit creation... [and] put simply more credit creation, lower dollar, less credit creation, higher dollar" "so de-dollarization is actually bullish for the dollar in the short term because... there's always people scrambling for dollar liquidity" "if the dollar goes up too fast, too quick, it squeezes other nations and causes serious economic pain" "The dollar is very much a financial weapon and it is used as such" "So the good news is I don't think the dollar is going away anytime soon. The bad news is there's a new monetary system coming" "I don't know when, but it's going to involve gold because the signal is going to involve gold because central banks are acquiring gold...[and] commercial banks are acquiring gold because they made it a tier-one capital again, which is essentially the ability to create money from your gold" "So I'm bullish the dollar long term until I see the charts break. And they haven't broken yet" "that's why when people ask me, What should I be doing with the stock market?, I go, Take some of your money and put it in the cash— They go, but inflation's killing me. Well, inflation may be killing you, but if the stock market deflates 50%, your cash is... a lot better" Shannon Joy Edward Dowd

Sense Receptor

109,227 次观看 • 3 个月前

GOLD Elon Musk Elon Musk is suggesting a live walk through and audit of Fort Knox. He isn’t saying there has been fraud but just suggesting a walk through and audit. Why? Well there’s a reason Fort Knox is both a place and a term of endearment for things that are impossible to access. Isn’t it important we know how much gold we have and that it's all there- that there is an accurate accounting? Today gold is an precious metal, used for jewelry, other manufacturing products that use gold, trading, store of value and other uses. Before introducing the FED and allowing central banks to control our money supply, our money supply was controlled by the amount of gold we had. You could never just print money unless there was gold to back it. Nixon ended that and power was turned over to the Federal Reserve. Why is gold being moved from UK banks to USA banks? Some say the UK has a lower conversion rate of gold to dollars. Some say there is a fear of tariffs on gold and the owners and traders want gold to be stored in the US to avoid tariffs. Others say traders fear tariffs will cause inflation and gold will be a better store of value or a hedge against inflation. Did you know there’s a literal fear and greed index that reflects, well, fear and greed in markets. Much of their fear is unfounded because gold doesn’t always fare well in a high tariff environment. That could lead to another discussion of how tariffs will be used as leverage as well as a balancing tool. At the end of the day, gold is being moved into Fort Knox since the inauguration and I think knowing how much we have and how it’s accounted for is an important task for President Trump and he should assign Elon Musk to the task. Rand Paul discusses the issue in this video.

Joyreaper

14,830 次观看 • 1 年前

Gold is not done falling. Nobody wants to hear this, but read this first. Right now, several factors are putting pressure on gold at the same time: → High Fed interest rates. As long as the market is not pricing aggressive rate cuts and bond yields remain elevated, gold becomes less attractive. → After such a massive rally, profit taking is now adding enormous selling pressure. → Central banks have been one of the biggest sources of demand for gold. If that demand slows down, gold loses a major pillar of support. Turkey is already selling. → The U.S. economy remains strong, and a stronger dollar is pulling capital back into stocks and other risk assets. → Historically, after major rallies, gold often corrects 20-40%. Late summer into early fall has also been one of the weakest seasonal periods. → The U.S.-Iran war is still going, but the gold rally which priced it in already happened. Do you understand what this means? One catalyst alone would not worry me. But when all of them start aligning at the same time, I pay attention. And that is exactly what is happening now. I warned about this. Reminder: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for the last 15 years, including the tops in Gold and Silver, the collapse in Oil, the SpaceX drop, and Bitcoin’s crash. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

139,067 次观看 • 1 个月前

A caller asks Dave Ramsey what to do with required minimum distributions from his 401k that he doesn't need. His gut tells him to invest in gold. Dave's response is immediate and emphatic: "No, no, no, no, we don't put anything in gold." His reasoning starts with the math. "Gold is much more volatile. If you look at the price of gold on a chart, it's way up and way down, much more than the stock market is. It is a lot riskier, and it does not yield a good net return; the average annual rate of return on gold sucks." But Dave doesn't stop at performance. He wants to explain "why" gold underperforms. And this is where the conversation gets interesting. "Gold is a commodity; it's a rock that is yellow." He explains that commodities, whether barrels of oil, precious metals, or corn, are all traded 100% based on people's perception of shortage. If the perception is that there's too much of it, the price goes down. Compare that to a real investment: "An investment that creates revenue is a company that's running and making a profit, like Home Depot, Microsoft, or Apple. Their stock goes up because they are creating revenue. Gold, corn, and oil do not create revenue; they only trade based on scarcity and the psychology of the marketplace, greed and fear." In other words, when gold prices rise, the gold itself hasn't become more valuable. Dave puts it plainly: "If a whole bunch of people rush towards gold, it creates a shortage and the price goes up, but the gold did not become more valuable, just more people were chasing fewer bars." He extends the logic to income-producing real estate, which is priced based on the income it creates, not because it's a "golden rock." And he takes a swipe at diamonds while he's at it: "Diamonds are not necessarily a girl's best friend; that is a marketing slogan. Diamonds do not go up in value; there is no actual investment return on them." Then Dave addresses the headlines designed to scare people into gold, stories about the dollar being threatened by China, Russia, or Brazil: "You can't run to gold because there is nothing magical about it." His geopolitical take is sharp: "While Russia and Brazil are large landmasses, they are not large economies. Texas has a larger gross domestic production than Brazil; Texas is a bigger economy. These countries are going to have to do business with the '800-pound gorilla,' and we do business in dollars, so they are still going to be at our mercy." His advice to the caller? Pull the required distribution out of the 401k as the law demands, and move it into good mutual funds in the process.

Black Edge

83,185 次观看 • 4 个月前

In 1971, the U.S. literally ran out of money. Back then, the dollar was backed by gold, which meant every paper dollar represented real gold sitting in U.S. reserves. The problem was the country was spending way more than it earned, printing dollars that didn’t have enough gold to back them. As other countries realized this, they started trading their dollars in for gold. The gold reserves began to drain fast. That Sunday night, President Nixon went on TV and told the world the U.S. was “suspend temporarily convertibility” of dollars into gold. What that really meant was the U.S. couldn’t pay what it owed in real money anymore. At that time, Ray Dalio was a young clerk on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. He thought markets would collapse the next day. Instead, stocks soared. The U.S. had just made money worth less, and when that happens, asset prices usually rise. He later found out the same thing had happened in 1933 when FDR also cut the gold link. Both times, the U.S. printed more paper money to keep spending, and each dollar ended up buying less. That moment in 1971 changed the entire global system. From then on, money wasn’t something you could exchange for gold, it became a promise backed only by trust. And that’s where the connection to today comes in. Trust in that promise is fading again. Inflation is running above target, the dollar is sliding, and people are moving into things that don’t rely on faith in any government such as gold and bitcoin. Foreign investors aren’t pulling away from America, but they are protecting themselves. They’re still buying U.S. assets, just not without hedging the risk. They don’t want to be caught holding paper that keeps losing value. Dalio’s story shows how this cycle keeps repeating. The system runs on confidence until it doesn’t. And every time it slips, people turn back to hard assets, not because they want to, but because they have to.

StockMarket.News

95,018 次观看 • 11 个月前