正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Simba Chitando said that the state did not engage us and they had no resources. Let me draw your attention to a ZASM meet that we had and a CIO operative who worked as part of the external intelligence component and a monitor in ZASM: Wonder Ndemera said in... show more

Rutendo Matinyarare

91,360 subscribers

72,493 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Here is Advocate Simba Chitando EXPLAINING the work they did via the Zimbabwe Anti-Sanctions Movement (ZASM) together with Rutendo Matinyarare. ZASM was a Registered NGO/NPO in South Africa & therefore could only receive DONATIONS. Dr Tagwirei GENEROUSLY donated to ZASM & there was NEVER a legal obligation for him to do so. Dr Tagwirei covered all the ZASM expenses & legacy debts… However, Advocate Chitando is unaware of the “new payments” made by Dr Dr P Tungwarara, Presidential Advisor to Rutendo….

Here is Advocate Simba Chitando EXPLAINING the work they did via the Zimbabwe Anti-Sanctions Movement (ZASM) together with Rutendo Matinyarare. ZASM was a Registered NGO/NPO in South Africa & therefore could only receive DONATIONS. Dr Tagwirei GENEROUSLY donated to ZASM & there was NEVER a legal obligation for him to do so. Dr Tagwirei covered all the ZASM expenses & legacy debts… However, Advocate Chitando is unaware of the “new payments” made by Dr Dr P Tungwarara, Presidential Advisor to Rutendo….

𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊

28,714 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 NOW: AG Todd Blanche confirms DOJ is surging resources into Minnesota fraud investigations, reaching as far as the LEADERSHIP and OFFICIALS who allowed it "We've spent a ton of resources and we continue to spend a ton of resources in Minneapolis combating fraud. And that includes a very intense look at the leadership and the programs and who's administering them." "The governor knows that, and everybody knows that, and that should be the case. That's what every single person should expect us to do is the Department of Justice." "Yes, we have a lot of resources spending there." Good! Don't leave any stone unturned!

🚨 NOW: AG Todd Blanche confirms DOJ is surging resources into Minnesota fraud investigations, reaching as far as the LEADERSHIP and OFFICIALS who allowed it "We've spent a ton of resources and we continue to spend a ton of resources in Minneapolis combating fraud. And that includes a very intense look at the leadership and the programs and who's administering them." "The governor knows that, and everybody knows that, and that should be the case. That's what every single person should expect us to do is the Department of Justice." "Yes, we have a lot of resources spending there." Good! Don't leave any stone unturned!

Eric Daugherty

27,601 次观看 • 6 天前

Statements of the Israeli woman prisoner who was released yesterday from Gaza: "When we arrived in Gaza, they first told us that they believed in the Quran and would not harm us, they said that they would treat us the way they treat their neighbors, we were under intensive care. a paramedic and a doctor came and made sure that we always have the medicines we take, they were very interested in the health aspect and we also had a doctor attached to us, he came every two or three days to see what was happening to us. They were responsible and they would definitely bring the medicines and if the medicines were not the same, they would give similar medicines. They were very kind and made sure that we ate well. We also ate their food. They treated us well. They paid attention. They had women with us who knew what feminine hygiene meant and made sure we had everything. Hamas had planned everything long ago. They prepared everything we needed, including shampoo and hair conditioner - the inefficiency of IDF and the Shin Bet hurt us so much, they made us victims of the government.

Statements of the Israeli woman prisoner who was released yesterday from Gaza: "When we arrived in Gaza, they first told us that they believed in the Quran and would not harm us, they said that they would treat us the way they treat their neighbors, we were under intensive care. a paramedic and a doctor came and made sure that we always have the medicines we take, they were very interested in the health aspect and we also had a doctor attached to us, he came every two or three days to see what was happening to us. They were responsible and they would definitely bring the medicines and if the medicines were not the same, they would give similar medicines. They were very kind and made sure that we ate well. We also ate their food. They treated us well. They paid attention. They had women with us who knew what feminine hygiene meant and made sure we had everything. Hamas had planned everything long ago. They prepared everything we needed, including shampoo and hair conditioner - the inefficiency of IDF and the Shin Bet hurt us so much, they made us victims of the government.

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

620,923 次观看 • 2 年前

#WATCH | Himachal Pradesh: Nihang jathedar Akali Jasdeep Singh says, "We did not seek a specific number of days' time; we had only placed forth a few of our demands. They have accepted our demands and said that they agree on it. They have given us 2-day time and said that they will then make us meet the Nihang Sikhs who are under house arrest. After we meet them and their family, we will discuss the further strategy. We will not go back as of now, as soon as the Nihang Sikhs are released and brought to us, we will go with them to Uttarakhand and then return directly to Punjab."

#WATCH | Himachal Pradesh: Nihang jathedar Akali Jasdeep Singh says, "We did not seek a specific number of days' time; we had only placed forth a few of our demands. They have accepted our demands and said that they agree on it. They have given us 2-day time and said that they will then make us meet the Nihang Sikhs who are under house arrest. After we meet them and their family, we will discuss the further strategy. We will not go back as of now, as soon as the Nihang Sikhs are released and brought to us, we will go with them to Uttarakhand and then return directly to Punjab."

ANI

46,688 次观看 • 1 个月前

Minister for Energy Resources and Law R. Nirmalkumar on Friday (August 14, 2026) claimed that the DMK and the BJP had been in a “covert” alliance earlier and had now decided to engage in a “direct” alliance.

Minister for Energy Resources and Law R. Nirmalkumar on Friday (August 14, 2026) claimed that the DMK and the BJP had been in a “covert” alliance earlier and had now decided to engage in a “direct” alliance.

The Hindu

17,822 次观看 • 4 天前

Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Jonathan Wilkinson says that the premiers who are requesting a meeting with PM Trudeau on the carbon tax have “no climate plans” and “no plan to actually address the climate issue.”

Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Jonathan Wilkinson says that the premiers who are requesting a meeting with PM Trudeau on the carbon tax have “no climate plans” and “no plan to actually address the climate issue.”

Juno News

101,137 次观看 • 2 年前

Burns: But let me just say, as you suggested, that the Old Testament says there’s nothing new under the sun. On July 4th, 1776, there was. Everybody up to that point had been under authoritarian rule, had been a subject. It was in the interests of their rulers that they be uneducated, that they be superstitious, that they be distracted by conspiracies. And then suddenly you had something new. And they were speaking not just about their present moment, but about all of us — the “unborn millions,” John Adams said — who would benefit from the success of this revolution. And they were creating a new thing: citizens. And the pursuit of happiness for them, uniformly, was not the pursuit of objects in a marketplace of things, but lifelong learning in a marketplace of ideas. Because if you continued to educate yourself, you would become more virtuous, less susceptible to, as Adams said, ambition and avarice and greed. And that virtue would allow you to enjoy and be able to have the active idea of citizenship. This is brand new in the world. And this is one hell of a story.

Acyn

170,484 次观看 • 9 个月前

We chat with the ex white farmers representing the Farmers Compensation Agreement (FCA) who are part of government led US$3.5bn Global Compensation deed (GCD). They raise pertinent questions regarding the paternity of Department of State Policy Provisions Act (H.R. 5300) section 303 sponsored by Rep. Brian Mast . They accuse adv Simba Chitando of sneaking in, the “badly worded” bill which is practically impossible to implement. Have a listen to Andy Pascoe and Harry Orphanides articulate the issue. Adv Simba Chitando has agreed to share a drink with us and give his side of the story. This is part of our on going series to unpack and generate debate as Bill 5300 progresses through US legislature. As Zimbabweans, have your say and share your thoughts.

We chat with the ex white farmers representing the Farmers Compensation Agreement (FCA) who are part of government led US$3.5bn Global Compensation deed (GCD). They raise pertinent questions regarding the paternity of Department of State Policy Provisions Act (H.R. 5300) section 303 sponsored by Rep. Brian Mast . They accuse adv Simba Chitando of sneaking in, the “badly worded” bill which is practically impossible to implement. Have a listen to Andy Pascoe and Harry Orphanides articulate the issue. Adv Simba Chitando has agreed to share a drink with us and give his side of the story. This is part of our on going series to unpack and generate debate as Bill 5300 progresses through US legislature. As Zimbabweans, have your say and share your thoughts.

Tinashe

16,051 次观看 • 10 个月前

#WATCH | Chandigarh | Jaswinder Kaur Bath, wife of Colonel Pushpinder Singh Bath, who was allegedly assaulted by Punjab Police personnel in Patiala, says, "We went to meet DGP Gaurav Yadav, but he was busy. We waited for one and a half hours, but then he left without meeting us. He is an army officer's son, but he still did so... I am raising my voice just because my son said that he would not stay in this country as it is not worth staying. I had to prove to him that justice would be given... Then, we went to meet the governor, and he had tears in his eyes when I spoke to him and when I showed him the pictures and the brutality. He called the DGP and told him that FIR is my right with all the names and to please do what is needed. The governor then told us that if the FIR is not registered, we should get back to him. I want to thank the governor for standing up with us. I came to know through the media that SSP Nanak Singh had said that a magisterial inquiry had been set up, but the FIR could not be changed... Today, when everyone was standing up with me, all the politicians started calling me, but I didn't pick up a single call as this was not a political fight. They cannot say that we were under the influence of alcohol as it is there in the (medical) report of a government hospital... A police inspector told me that we cannot add the names of some police personnel in the FIR as they have been awarded as encounter specialists by the DIG and are about to be promoted. They said that police will do the needful but cannot name them in FIR ..." (21/03)

#WATCH | Chandigarh | Jaswinder Kaur Bath, wife of Colonel Pushpinder Singh Bath, who was allegedly assaulted by Punjab Police personnel in Patiala, says, "We went to meet DGP Gaurav Yadav, but he was busy. We waited for one and a half hours, but then he left without meeting us. He is an army officer's son, but he still did so... I am raising my voice just because my son said that he would not stay in this country as it is not worth staying. I had to prove to him that justice would be given... Then, we went to meet the governor, and he had tears in his eyes when I spoke to him and when I showed him the pictures and the brutality. He called the DGP and told him that FIR is my right with all the names and to please do what is needed. The governor then told us that if the FIR is not registered, we should get back to him. I want to thank the governor for standing up with us. I came to know through the media that SSP Nanak Singh had said that a magisterial inquiry had been set up, but the FIR could not be changed... Today, when everyone was standing up with me, all the politicians started calling me, but I didn't pick up a single call as this was not a political fight. They cannot say that we were under the influence of alcohol as it is there in the (medical) report of a government hospital... A police inspector told me that we cannot add the names of some police personnel in the FIR as they have been awarded as encounter specialists by the DIG and are about to be promoted. They said that police will do the needful but cannot name them in FIR ..." (21/03)

ANI

196,239 次观看 • 1 年前

The west just has that mentality that they owned Africa and its resources. But the truth is we are waking up to unite and take back control of our continent, like in the days of Mansa Musa and other kings who controlled most of their resources and land.

The west just has that mentality that they owned Africa and its resources. But the truth is we are waking up to unite and take back control of our continent, like in the days of Mansa Musa and other kings who controlled most of their resources and land.

Typical African

50,021 次观看 • 1 年前

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran “had to happen no matter what” on Monday ahead of a briefing at the U.S. Capitol. “Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it,” Rubio said. “Obviously we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran “had to happen no matter what” on Monday ahead of a briefing at the U.S. Capitol. “Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it,” Rubio said. “Obviously we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it.”

CBS News

36,497 次观看 • 5 个月前

REPORTER: And do you believe you were the target of this tonight? PRESIDENT TRUMP: I guess. I mean, these people, they're crazy. They're crazy. And, you know, you never know. He was very far away from me. He had to go through a lot. We had resources all over. We had resources sitting at tables, literally in disguise, sitting maybe at your table. Who knows? But we had people all over the room, so he had a long way to go. That was really a first line of defense, and they got him.

REPORTER: And do you believe you were the target of this tonight? PRESIDENT TRUMP: I guess. I mean, these people, they're crazy. They're crazy. And, you know, you never know. He was very far away from me. He had to go through a lot. We had resources all over. We had resources sitting at tables, literally in disguise, sitting maybe at your table. Who knows? But we had people all over the room, so he had a long way to go. That was really a first line of defense, and they got him.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

41,716 次观看 • 3 个月前

In like 2019 I said something similar — that the Canadian left had essentially invented and imported an idea of extreme racism, white nationalism, and racist police violence that simply did and does not exist in Canada. That they had glommed onto American race discourse that was frankly ridiculous to apply to Canada considering our vastly different demographics. I was cancelled by almost all of the leftist, “gender critical,” feminists in Canada as a result, who proved themselves to be just as addicted to wokeism as the rest of Canadian progressives, with the exception of the trans issue.

In like 2019 I said something similar — that the Canadian left had essentially invented and imported an idea of extreme racism, white nationalism, and racist police violence that simply did and does not exist in Canada. That they had glommed onto American race discourse that was frankly ridiculous to apply to Canada considering our vastly different demographics. I was cancelled by almost all of the leftist, “gender critical,” feminists in Canada as a result, who proved themselves to be just as addicted to wokeism as the rest of Canadian progressives, with the exception of the trans issue.

Meghan Murphy

13,548 次观看 • 1 年前

The video statement by Simba Chitando, co-director of the Zimbabwe Anti-Sanctions Movement (ZASM), deserves careful scrutiny - because if his assertions are accurate, they raise a far more damaging question than the one currently dominating public debate. They raise the question of whether Rutendo Matinyarare has been operating not as an activist, but as an extortionist and political communications mercenary who has now successfully collected. Chitando was not a peripheral figure. He was ZASM's legal strategist and co-director - inside the organisation, present for its decisions, party to its finances. His testimony carries weight precisely because of that proximity. Several facts emerge from his statement that cannot be easily dismissed. The Government of Zimbabwe declined to fund ZASM. That single detail collapses the foundational claim that Matinyarare was executing a state-commissioned mandate deserving state-level compensation. Anti-sanctions advocacy in Zimbabwe has never belonged to one organisation - parties, churches, diplomats, academics, traditional leaders, and ordinary citizens have all participated for years. Government had no particular reason to single out ZASM, and it did not. ZASM sought and received support from private donors, including Dr. Kuda Tagwirei, who covered organisational expenses, legal liabilities, and logistical costs. Chitando states categorically that neither ZASM nor its directors are owed anything by Tagwirei or anyone else. The organisation is effectively dormant - no longer litigating, its legal challenge withdrawn, pending deregistration in South Africa. Most significantly, Chitando reveals that additional funding and a vehicle were recently channelled through Matinyarare without his knowledge - despite his being a co-director of the same organisation. That detail is the thread that unravels everything. If previous expenses were already settled, nothing was owed, and the co-director knew nothing about the transaction, then what exactly was being compensated? Why did it require a publicised gifting spectacle rather than a quiet institutional arrangement? The gifter's own argument answers that question - and in answering it, destroys itself. The claim now being advanced is that the gift was necessary to encourage Matinyarare to cease his attacks on the highest office in the land. Set against Chitando's testimony that nothing was owed, that argument does not become an explanation. It becomes a confession. You do not pay someone to stop attacking you unless they have made it clear that continued silence carries a price. That is not gratitude. That is not recognition. That has a much simpler name: extortion. And the person who pays an extortionist does not resolve a problem. They establish a rate. Here is where Matinyarare's own well-documented habits become impossible to separate from the analysis. He is notorious for recording conversations with virtually everyone he engages - politicians, officials, businesspeople, fellow activists. In his trade, that is not due diligence. That is inventory. A man who systematically builds an archive of sensitive recorded material across years, then converts public pressure into tangible assets, has not stumbled into a business model. He has refined one. The gift confirms that the model works. Which raises the question that no one paying attention can honestly avoid: what guarantee exists that this ends here? History is unambiguous on this point. Extortion does not conclude with the first payment. It scales with proof of concept. What assurance does anyone have - the gifter, the institution, the office apparently being threatened - that the cameras will not return, that the social media pressure will not resume, that the recorded archive will not find new applications the moment a new grievance is manufactured or an old one is reframed? The answer is none. There is no assurance. There is only the next negotiation, now better informed by the knowledge of exactly what pressure yields results. What makes this particularly corrosive is that it did not have to be public. Zimbabwe has institutions - political, governmental, security - entirely capable of managing sensitive matters involving proximity to the highest office with discretion, through proper channels, without cameras and without luxury assets becoming social media content. The decision to make this spectacularly public was either a catastrophic miscalculation or a deliberate signal. Neither interpretation reflects well on the judgment of those involved. Chitando's testimony has done something that the weeks of online noise failed to do. It has stripped away the activist framing and forced a clear-eyed look at the underlying mechanics. What those mechanics reveal is a political communications mercenary who identified a pressure point, cultivated it over years, recorded everything along the way as operational collateral, applied sustained public pressure against the highest office in the land, and collected - publicly, luxuriously, and on camera. The only remaining questions are who allowed this to reach this point, whether those responsible for protecting the integrity of Zimbabwe's highest office fully understand what they have now set in motion, and whether the rate has already been noted by others watching carefully from the sidelines. Because if it has, the Matinyarare affair is not a conclusion. It is a template.

The video statement by Simba Chitando, co-director of the Zimbabwe Anti-Sanctions Movement (ZASM), deserves careful scrutiny - because if his assertions are accurate, they raise a far more damaging question than the one currently dominating public debate. They raise the question of whether Rutendo Matinyarare has been operating not as an activist, but as an extortionist and political communications mercenary who has now successfully collected. Chitando was not a peripheral figure. He was ZASM's legal strategist and co-director - inside the organisation, present for its decisions, party to its finances. His testimony carries weight precisely because of that proximity. Several facts emerge from his statement that cannot be easily dismissed. The Government of Zimbabwe declined to fund ZASM. That single detail collapses the foundational claim that Matinyarare was executing a state-commissioned mandate deserving state-level compensation. Anti-sanctions advocacy in Zimbabwe has never belonged to one organisation - parties, churches, diplomats, academics, traditional leaders, and ordinary citizens have all participated for years. Government had no particular reason to single out ZASM, and it did not. ZASM sought and received support from private donors, including Dr. Kuda Tagwirei, who covered organisational expenses, legal liabilities, and logistical costs. Chitando states categorically that neither ZASM nor its directors are owed anything by Tagwirei or anyone else. The organisation is effectively dormant - no longer litigating, its legal challenge withdrawn, pending deregistration in South Africa. Most significantly, Chitando reveals that additional funding and a vehicle were recently channelled through Matinyarare without his knowledge - despite his being a co-director of the same organisation. That detail is the thread that unravels everything. If previous expenses were already settled, nothing was owed, and the co-director knew nothing about the transaction, then what exactly was being compensated? Why did it require a publicised gifting spectacle rather than a quiet institutional arrangement? The gifter's own argument answers that question - and in answering it, destroys itself. The claim now being advanced is that the gift was necessary to encourage Matinyarare to cease his attacks on the highest office in the land. Set against Chitando's testimony that nothing was owed, that argument does not become an explanation. It becomes a confession. You do not pay someone to stop attacking you unless they have made it clear that continued silence carries a price. That is not gratitude. That is not recognition. That has a much simpler name: extortion. And the person who pays an extortionist does not resolve a problem. They establish a rate. Here is where Matinyarare's own well-documented habits become impossible to separate from the analysis. He is notorious for recording conversations with virtually everyone he engages - politicians, officials, businesspeople, fellow activists. In his trade, that is not due diligence. That is inventory. A man who systematically builds an archive of sensitive recorded material across years, then converts public pressure into tangible assets, has not stumbled into a business model. He has refined one. The gift confirms that the model works. Which raises the question that no one paying attention can honestly avoid: what guarantee exists that this ends here? History is unambiguous on this point. Extortion does not conclude with the first payment. It scales with proof of concept. What assurance does anyone have - the gifter, the institution, the office apparently being threatened - that the cameras will not return, that the social media pressure will not resume, that the recorded archive will not find new applications the moment a new grievance is manufactured or an old one is reframed? The answer is none. There is no assurance. There is only the next negotiation, now better informed by the knowledge of exactly what pressure yields results. What makes this particularly corrosive is that it did not have to be public. Zimbabwe has institutions - political, governmental, security - entirely capable of managing sensitive matters involving proximity to the highest office with discretion, through proper channels, without cameras and without luxury assets becoming social media content. The decision to make this spectacularly public was either a catastrophic miscalculation or a deliberate signal. Neither interpretation reflects well on the judgment of those involved. Chitando's testimony has done something that the weeks of online noise failed to do. It has stripped away the activist framing and forced a clear-eyed look at the underlying mechanics. What those mechanics reveal is a political communications mercenary who identified a pressure point, cultivated it over years, recorded everything along the way as operational collateral, applied sustained public pressure against the highest office in the land, and collected - publicly, luxuriously, and on camera. The only remaining questions are who allowed this to reach this point, whether those responsible for protecting the integrity of Zimbabwe's highest office fully understand what they have now set in motion, and whether the rate has already been noted by others watching carefully from the sidelines. Because if it has, the Matinyarare affair is not a conclusion. It is a template.

Dereck Goto

29,621 次观看 • 1 个月前

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "To me, it's [JFK's] most important speech. It's one of the most important speeches in American history; the thing that he did that was so unusual in that speech is he talked to the American people and asked them to put themselves in the shoes of the Russians..." "The zeitgeist of our era was that America had won the war and now we were going to rightfully dominate the peace. And he said something very, very different to Americans that challenged that patriotic assumption: He said, no, it was actually the Russians who won the war. They weakened Hitler and made it possible for us to march into Berlin." "And he talked about the suffering of the Russians during the war and to legitimize their security concerns, which nobody was doing... what he was saying to the Americans is, no, they have legitimate security concerns the same as we do, and we need to understand those things." "And he reminded Americans of the suffering that the Russians had endured, unimaginable suffering. One in seven Russians had been killed during World War II. He asked Americans to imagine that all of the land, all of the cities, all of the towns from the East Coast to Chicago had been leveled to rubble, that the forests and fields had been burned. And he said that's what happened to Russia during the war. That's what they sacrificed for us, and they have legitimate security concerns to make sure that never happens again..." "I'm speaking you today because the world is once again at a very similar crossroads. As in my uncle's time, nuclear tensions are at an extreme and dangerous level. As in his time, we have a unique opportunity not only to diffuse those tensions, but to take a radically different path, a path towards peace."

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "To me, it's [JFK's] most important speech. It's one of the most important speeches in American history; the thing that he did that was so unusual in that speech is he talked to the American people and asked them to put themselves in the shoes of the Russians..." "The zeitgeist of our era was that America had won the war and now we were going to rightfully dominate the peace. And he said something very, very different to Americans that challenged that patriotic assumption: He said, no, it was actually the Russians who won the war. They weakened Hitler and made it possible for us to march into Berlin." "And he talked about the suffering of the Russians during the war and to legitimize their security concerns, which nobody was doing... what he was saying to the Americans is, no, they have legitimate security concerns the same as we do, and we need to understand those things." "And he reminded Americans of the suffering that the Russians had endured, unimaginable suffering. One in seven Russians had been killed during World War II. He asked Americans to imagine that all of the land, all of the cities, all of the towns from the East Coast to Chicago had been leveled to rubble, that the forests and fields had been burned. And he said that's what happened to Russia during the war. That's what they sacrificed for us, and they have legitimate security concerns to make sure that never happens again..." "I'm speaking you today because the world is once again at a very similar crossroads. As in my uncle's time, nuclear tensions are at an extreme and dangerous level. As in his time, we have a unique opportunity not only to diffuse those tensions, but to take a radically different path, a path towards peace."

COMBATE |🇵🇷

287,322 次观看 • 3 年前