正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Since 1978 lsraeI planted 13,000 fake EMPTY “historical” tombs around Jerusalem to claim false Jewish archeological history for the city of Jerusalem The only thing buried deeper than Israel’s fake history is its shame. And they haven’t found that yet

204,266 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Most people have no idea about the real history of Al-Aqsa Mosque, because they’ve only been fed the Islamic Palestinian propaganda version of events. They believe that Al-Aqsa has always been Islam’s third holiest site, that it has belonged to Muslims since the dawn of time, and that Israel is the oppressor for merely existing near it. None of that is true. The Temple Mount in Jerusalem was the holiest site in Judaism for over a thousand years before Islam even appeared in history. It housed the First and Second Jewish Temples, the center of Jewish worship and pilgrimage. When the Romans destroyed the Second Temple in 70 AD, they built pagan shrines over it, but its Jewish identity never disappeared. In the 7th century Islam emerges and expands through conquest, and begins hijacking Jewish and Christian sites, prophets, and narratives. At first, Jerusalem had no major significance in Islam. Muhammad never set foot there. There was no mosque. There was no pilgrimage. There was no Islamic history tied to the city. But that changed during the brutal power struggle between Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan and Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr. By the late 7th century, Islam was deeply divided. Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr controlled Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities in Islam. And Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, the Umayyad Caliph, controlled the Levant. But Abd al-Malik had a problem, he didn’t want the people of the Levant traveling to Mecca for pilgrimage, because that would give power to his rival. Abd al-Malik declared the Temple Mount as Alaqsa mosque that was mentioned in the quran, and he made it an alternative place of pilgrimage. He ordered the construction of the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to divert attention from Mecca. And just like that, Islam manufactured a holy site for political gain. The real Masjid Al-Aqsa referred to in the Quran was not in Jerusalem, it was between Mecca and Ta’if. There was no mosque in Jerusalem at the time. There was no Islamic presence there. Yet, centuries later, after Islam had conquered the city, the Islamic narrative retroactively applied this Quranic verse to Jerusalem, again, for political convenience. If Israel wanted to act like Islamic conquerors, it could have easily done to Al-Aqsa what Turkey did to the Hagia Sophia. It could have converted the mosque into the Third Temple, banned Muslim prayer on the site, erased any trace of Islamic history, as Muslims did to Christian and Jewish sites throughout history. But Israel didn’t do that. Israel allows Muslims to pray there freely. Israel protects Al-Aqsa, even as it is used to spread anti-Semitic propaganda and incite violence. Yet, despite this, the world condemns Israel for merely existing in its own capital.

Dan Burmawi

119,306 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Jerusalem Accord: A New Vision for Peace In this new vision for tranquillity, the Jerusalem Accord advocates for the establishment of the State of Jerusalem, which supersedes the confines of the city to encompass the whole territorial canvas of what is currently understood as Israel and Palestine. In doing so, it emphasizes the necessity of peaceful coexistence underpinned by an acknowledgment of the region's multifaceted historical narratives. This is not simply about the city of Jerusalem, but a much broader territorial reimagining. While valuing the cultural melange that the current Israel and Palestine brought forth, it encourages a transformation into a unified territorial entity, the State of Jerusalem. This state would rise beyond territorial disputes and operate on a shared governance model, ensuring equal representation and cultivating an environment of mutual coexistence. Abiding by this vision, the State of Jerusalem would witness a celebration of multiculturalism, reflecting the rich historical and cultural lineage of the lands of Israel and Palestine but echoing an evolved narrative of unity and cooperation. The proposal served by the Jerusalem Accord is an appeal for resolution, a call for establishing a State of Jerusalem that welcomes diversity but unifies under shared governance—a beacon of how we can reimagine an Israel and Palestine under one banner: a peaceful State of Jerusalem. This testament only becomes possible through mutual respect, understanding, and resilience. It's about recognizing the appeal and practicality of unity instead of division, symbolizing one land, one shared past, a harmonious present, and a diverse future. You're correct, color film processes were not commonly used until much later, in the 1950s. Therefore, the original footage from 1928 would have been in black and white, and the color was likely added using modern digital techniques. Using this information, here's a revised suggestion for your post: Immerse yourself in history with the video below, titled "Jerusalem, 1928 Rare Color Footage”. Through the wonders of modern technology, this originally black-and-white movie has been meticulously recolored, breathing fresh life into our shared past. As we witness scenes from a momentous period in Jerusalem's history transform before our eyes, let us pause to reflect. Unity, understanding, and the path to peaceful coexistence are timeless pursuits that we continue to champion in the Jerusalem Accord. Enjoy this vivid journey into history, as we remember our collective heritage and aspire to a harmonious future. #ANewDawnForJerusalem."

Haytham Algosaibi هيثم القصيبي

1,538,961 次观看 • 2 年前

BREAKING: Israeli News Channel Kan 11 Insults the 1,700-Year-Old Armenian Presence in Jerusalem. [Video with subtitles⬇️] On Thursday, May 15, 2025, following Armenia’s Eurovision performance of “Survivor” by Armenian artist PARG, a commentator on Israel’s Kan 11 News mockingly stated: “I can’t believe we gave ‘these’ guys an entire quarter in Jerusalem. Survivor — that’s how we feel after watching this song.” This was not only insulting, but egregiously inaccurate. Though Kan 11 brands itself as a news channel, its grasp of historical fact appears to be tenuous at best — and nonexistent at worst. So allow me to provide a brief historical input: Breaking News for Kan 11: •The Armenian presence in Jerusalem dates back to 301 AD — the year Armenia became the first nation in the world to officially adopt Christianity as its state religion. This milestone led to a wave of Armenian pilgrimage to the Holy Land and, over centuries, the stone-by-stone establishment of what is now known as the Armenian Quarter of Jerusalem. •No one "gave us" a quarter in Jerusalem. We fought for it, built it, over centuries, preserved it and continue to defend it to this day. In the face of such ignorant and racially-laced commentary, we assert — and will always assert — the truth: The Armenian Quarter of Jerusalem has always been Armenian, and it will always remain Armenian. We are a people who have endured genocide, dispossession, cultural erasure, and generational trauma — and yet we remain, we are still, against all odds, still here. We remain more united than ever, and we remain resolute in defending our rightful and ancestral presence in the Holy City that is Jerusalem. Kan 11 crossed a red line. An immediate public apology is required to the Armenian people — for the insult, for the distortion, and for the disgrace.

Kegham Balian

162,765 次观看 • 1 年前