Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Since everyone is putting David’s dick down there mouth Let’s revisit history Dmitry Bivol technically abused Zurdo who was undefeated and riding high and had a huge weight advantage and 3 inch reach advantage Dmitry all knight showed high levels of counter puncher , pressure , elite defense with...

69,924 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

You try to tell guys about this and they don’t understand. I have been the broke guy with women paying for everything for me. I have had women trying to move me into their place when I was in-debt and unemployed. We are talking very attractive women, with plenty of options with men who have jobs, houses, etc. Women are not attracted to money in and of itself. Yes, there are broke women who are desperate for a man who will pay their bills for them. But as soon as you hit middle class or higher, money becomes less and less of a concern to women. There are a lot of women out there who are not worried about money at all and are just looking for a guy they’re attracted to. By ‘attracted’, we’re not talking ‘Adonis-tier Chad’ (another widespread Internet rumor); instead, we’re talking: • Cool • Fun • Confident • Sexy • Social skills • Knows what he is ABOUT with a solid male FRAME A little ambition doesn’t hurt, either. No middle or upper class girl wants to date the guy who’s broke and is content to STAY broke. But if you’re down and out but with big dreams, and you’re working on them, that’ll sweep a lot of women right up. Then instead of going for a guy who’s a ‘sure thing’, they get to bet on an up-and-comer. Money’s great to have if you have it. But there are a lot of dudes with money who do not have women. There are a lot of dudes who have women who do not have money. Money ≠ women. It is just a nice tool for making life easier.

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

21,074 views • 8 months ago

🇷🇺 Why wasn't the Omsk oil refinery better protected? 😁🔽 “Ukrainian drones reached the Omsk refinery — the largest in the country, accounting for almost 10% of all oil refining. The refinery supplies all of Western Siberia and the Urals. It is reported that FP-1 drones struck a unit with a capacity of 8.4 million tons of oil per year out of the plant’s total capacity of 22 million tons. The Omsk refinery is such an obvious and attractive target that it was bound to be reached sooner or later. And it was. From the Ukrainian border to Omsk is more than 2,500 km. The FP-1 flies at a speed of 140–180 km/h — that is 14–17 hours of flight in a straight line, but the drone most likely had to bypass air defense zones, so it would have taken longer. That means it took off yesterday evening and arrived today during the day. And this is a slow propeller-driven device that could have been detected in advance, its target could have been predicted, and it could have been tracked all the way to Omsk. In that time, mobile groups could have been redeployed, local forces alerted, aviation scrambled. Twenty hours, after all. Why didn’t this happen? Once again, the answer, I think, should be sought not in technology but in the structure of the Russian vertical of power itself. Imagine officials at all levels, from the Kremlin to Omsk. To organize any kind of defense system, someone has to take the initiative: find resources, involve unusual, non-system people who might be able to solve such tasks, although it’s not certain. Coordinate it with a dozen agencies, agree on coordination without calls to Moscow, cover everything with paperwork so as not to later be prosecuted for misuse of funds. And even after all that, there is still a high chance the drone will break through — and then they will have to figure out how exactly it got through and rebuild the defense again. But the main question is — who will be responsible for the first failure? That very initiative-taking official who made the decision himself? He is supposed to be held accountable for the failure. So he will be removed. By the way, until he showed up, everything was calm, Ukrainian drones weren’t arriving, and as soon as he started being active — they started arriving immediately. Maybe he’s an SBU agent, huh? Let’s be honest — would you, in his place, take on defending an oil refinery?” — Russian political blogger Igor Dimitriev Video: Exilenova+

Natalka

42,788 views • 2 months ago

YOOKAY DREAMS 1994 🫩💤 "Had the strangest dream last night. No, seriously. Really weird one." "What d'ya mean, Dave? What happened?" "Britain in the future, right? But it was all... different. Off." "Different how?" "Well, there were these... delivery drivers. Everywhere. On bicycles. Just loads of them, zooming about with these big square bags on their backs. You could order a curry on a telephone - well, not a telephone exactly, more like a little television in your pocket." "A television in your pocket?" "Sort of. Everyone had one. And you could just... summon a curry. Or Chinese. And these lads on bikes would bring it round. Mainly Asian lads, actually. Nice enough. But there were hundreds of them." "Right." "And the high street - you know, our high street? It was all chicken shops and barbers. Like, five of them. All called things like 'Dixy Chicken' and 'Bodrum Shave.' And phone shops. Loads of phone shops, but for the little pocket televisions, not actual phones. Nobody has house phones anymore." "Dave, mate.. you're... how much have you had to drink?" "I'm not drunk! It was just so vivid. And this is the weird bit - there was this politician called Tony Blair." "We know who Tony Blair is, Dave. Young guy, Labour leader". "Right, but in my dream, he was Prime Minister. And apparently he'd done something in 1997 that made all this happen. The chicken shops and barbers and the delivery drivers..." "Dave.. Dave? Just a dream. Want to play croquet?" "Yeah, alright. Good shout. Good shout."

𝙏𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙑𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

19,025 views • 9 months ago

HTML Artifacts are a big part of how I work with agents now. Artifacts can be more than just static files. When combined with agents, they can take action or help you take action. This unlocks all kinds of interesting ways to work with agents. This is clearly the future. Check out this writing and scheduler artifact I built in a few minutes. It uses a bit of HTML and JS. All the data is in markdown (Obsidian vaults), so the agent can access and modify it at any time. No DB needed. No sophisticated functionalities. The agent decides all that for me based on the skills, context, and memory it has access to. The best part about this simple stack is that all the important information stays with me. This has allowed me to build a recursive self-improving system and automations that can better tap into coding agents like Codex or Claude Code. I could have paid or built an entire app for scheduling posts, and there are so many of them out there. But I don't need to. I've realized a simple artifact does the job. And the simplicity of it is actually an advantage. Very little maintenance for very high returns on personalization, time, and efficiency. The other benefit of this is that I can add features as I please. That level of personalization feels magical, and we should all be pursuing more of it. All of this just keeps compounding. Of course, this example is just about writing. But I have similar artifacts for research, design, experimentation, evaluation, and so much more. And no, I didn't actually publish the post example I shared in the clip. It was just for demonstration purposes. I actually spend more time than this when writing together with agents. Lastly, having built my own agent orchestrator tool has made me realize that simplifying the tool stack is a superpower. If you are curious about how all this works, I will do a live session next week:

elvis

18,374 views • 4 months ago