正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Since the 2024 election, three distinct explanations have been given for why Democrats lost the White House and both houses of Congress, and why they remain unpopular with voters. Moderates say the party went woke on migration, race, and LGBT issues. A Democratic pollster called the party’s orthodoxy “noticeably...

shellenberger's profile picture

Michael Shellenberger

1,404,847 subscribers

189,644 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Joe Biden has just announced he’s not running for re-election and will support Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy instead. The announcement came as a shock to the people who work at the White House and to campaign aides, one of whom told Politico, "We’re all finding out by tweet. None of us understand what’s happening.” The same was true in Delaware, Biden’s home state. “I don’t think a soul in Delaware knew,” said a Biden campaign official. As such, this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate. The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden. This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits. It’s true that the Democratic elites followed the formal rules, most Democrats agreed that Biden should not run again, and a Democrat could still challenge Kamala Harris at the convention. But the party undermined the spirit of democracy in every election. Democracy, at its core, is about letting the people decide for themselves. That simply didn’t happen. In fact, a very small number of Democratic Party donors and media elites chose Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris. In many ways it was the media who influenced donors and decided Biden should go after his disastrous debate performance. To the extent that ordinary Democratic Party voters turned against Biden it was in response to the media turning on him. When the media insisted that Biden was fine, and that the worries about his health were just right-wing propaganda, Democratic voters were loyal to him. While it’s true someone could challenge Harris for the nomination, it’s very hard to see that happening, given Biden’s endorsement and the argument from Kamala Harris supporters that it would be borderline racist for anyone else to win the nomination. Within a few hours, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Senator Tammy Baldwin, and Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman all endorsed Harris. Other Party elites will likely do the same. Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump. As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state. However one feels about the GOP, the same can’t be said of Republicans. Republican voters rejected their own party leaders, donors, and the foreign policy establishment to nominate Trump for president in 2016. Democrats, by contrast, sided with the establishment candidate in choosing Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Why is that? Why did Democrats become the party controlled by elites and obedient to authority, and Republicans the party of rebellion and, increasingly, the working class?
5:38

Joe Biden has just announced he’s not running for re-election and will support Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy instead. The announcement came as a shock to the people who work at the White House and to campaign aides, one of whom told Politico, "We’re all finding out by tweet. None of us understand what’s happening.” The same was true in Delaware, Biden’s home state. “I don’t think a soul in Delaware knew,” said a Biden campaign official. As such, this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate. The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden. This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits. It’s true that the Democratic elites followed the formal rules, most Democrats agreed that Biden should not run again, and a Democrat could still challenge Kamala Harris at the convention. But the party undermined the spirit of democracy in every election. Democracy, at its core, is about letting the people decide for themselves. That simply didn’t happen. In fact, a very small number of Democratic Party donors and media elites chose Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris. In many ways it was the media who influenced donors and decided Biden should go after his disastrous debate performance. To the extent that ordinary Democratic Party voters turned against Biden it was in response to the media turning on him. When the media insisted that Biden was fine, and that the worries about his health were just right-wing propaganda, Democratic voters were loyal to him. While it’s true someone could challenge Harris for the nomination, it’s very hard to see that happening, given Biden’s endorsement and the argument from Kamala Harris supporters that it would be borderline racist for anyone else to win the nomination. Within a few hours, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Senator Tammy Baldwin, and Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman all endorsed Harris. Other Party elites will likely do the same. Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump. As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state. However one feels about the GOP, the same can’t be said of Republicans. Republican voters rejected their own party leaders, donors, and the foreign policy establishment to nominate Trump for president in 2016. Democrats, by contrast, sided with the establishment candidate in choosing Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Why is that? Why did Democrats become the party controlled by elites and obedient to authority, and Republicans the party of rebellion and, increasingly, the working class?

Michael Shellenberger

1,189,589 次观看 • 2 年前

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) today released its 192-page autopsy of the 2024 election. It blames the Biden White House for failing to defend Harris for over three and a half years. It says the White House never moved to “contradict or correct” the “border czar” label that defined Harris in voters’ minds. The report calls Trump’s “Kamala is for they/them” ad effective and unanswerable, given that she never repudiated trans surgeries for prison inmates. The autopsy reminds readers that in 1989, DNC Chairman Ron Brown reclaimed what it calls “the vital center of American discourse” after three straight presidential losses. It notes that Bill Clinton and Barack Obama then led the party to win the popular vote in seven of the next eight presidential elections. The report suggests Democrats need to recover that center. But the autopsy does not explain what pulled the party away from it, nor where the party went, which was the topic of a recent conversation I had with The Free Press’Coleman Hughes (below). The answer the autopsy dared not say is that “progressive” (radical) Left turned it against the core structures of Western civilization and took over the Party. Starting around 2010, meritocracy increasingly gave way to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandates, which the Biden White House imposed across the federal government in 2021. Law and order gave way to defund-the-police rhetoric and progressive prosecutors. Cheap energy gave way to a climate agenda that was on track to cost trillions in taxes and higher energy prices. National borders gave way to an unenforced southern frontier. And personal agency gave way to victimhood ideology, which casts citizens as products of oppressive systems rather than authors of their own lives.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
6:44

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) today released its 192-page autopsy of the 2024 election. It blames the Biden White House for failing to defend Harris for over three and a half years. It says the White House never moved to “contradict or correct” the “border czar” label that defined Harris in voters’ minds. The report calls Trump’s “Kamala is for they/them” ad effective and unanswerable, given that she never repudiated trans surgeries for prison inmates. The autopsy reminds readers that in 1989, DNC Chairman Ron Brown reclaimed what it calls “the vital center of American discourse” after three straight presidential losses. It notes that Bill Clinton and Barack Obama then led the party to win the popular vote in seven of the next eight presidential elections. The report suggests Democrats need to recover that center. But the autopsy does not explain what pulled the party away from it, nor where the party went, which was the topic of a recent conversation I had with The Free Press’Coleman Hughes (below). The answer the autopsy dared not say is that “progressive” (radical) Left turned it against the core structures of Western civilization and took over the Party. Starting around 2010, meritocracy increasingly gave way to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandates, which the Biden White House imposed across the federal government in 2021. Law and order gave way to defund-the-police rhetoric and progressive prosecutors. Cheap energy gave way to a climate agenda that was on track to cost trillions in taxes and higher energy prices. National borders gave way to an unenforced southern frontier. And personal agency gave way to victimhood ideology, which casts citizens as products of oppressive systems rather than authors of their own lives.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

26,085 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bernie Sanders sat down with podcaster Andrew Schulz for a revealing 80-minute conversation—and by the halfway mark, he started unleashing truth bombs. He said the Democratic establishment sold out decades ago, trading working-class voters for wealthy donors and out-of-touch consultants. According to Sanders, that’s when everything started to fall apart. “The 70s, 60s, Democrats caught on that you could raise a lot of money from wealthy people,” Sanders explained. “And it gets back to campaign financing and all that stuff. So you got a Democratic establishment now, which is funded by wealthy people. You have consultants who are really way out of touch with reality, who make a whole lot of money in campaigns. And working class is ignored,” Sanders said. He added that Donald Trump succeeded where Democrats fell short because at least he pretended to care about the working class.
0:51

Bernie Sanders sat down with podcaster Andrew Schulz for a revealing 80-minute conversation—and by the halfway mark, he started unleashing truth bombs. He said the Democratic establishment sold out decades ago, trading working-class voters for wealthy donors and out-of-touch consultants. According to Sanders, that’s when everything started to fall apart. “The 70s, 60s, Democrats caught on that you could raise a lot of money from wealthy people,” Sanders explained. “And it gets back to campaign financing and all that stuff. So you got a Democratic establishment now, which is funded by wealthy people. You have consultants who are really way out of touch with reality, who make a whole lot of money in campaigns. And working class is ignored,” Sanders said. He added that Donald Trump succeeded where Democrats fell short because at least he pretended to care about the working class.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

243,101 次观看 • 1 年前

🎥 In Senate primaries across the country, Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the DSCC and the rest of the Democratic establishment have consistently either formally endorsed or signaled support for candidates whose campaigns are focused on tinkering around the edges of the status quo rather than enacting bold populist change. Democratic voters, on the other hand, have turned out in droves to support candidates from the Bernie Sanders wing of the party, like Graham Platner and Abdul El-Sayed, who are surging in the polls and talking about sweeping economic reform. Drop Site’s Julian Andreone went to the U.S. Senate to ask Democratic senators if they think party leadership is out of touch with the base. Hear what they had to say: Julian Andreone
4:51

🎥 In Senate primaries across the country, Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the DSCC and the rest of the Democratic establishment have consistently either formally endorsed or signaled support for candidates whose campaigns are focused on tinkering around the edges of the status quo rather than enacting bold populist change. Democratic voters, on the other hand, have turned out in droves to support candidates from the Bernie Sanders wing of the party, like Graham Platner and Abdul El-Sayed, who are surging in the polls and talking about sweeping economic reform. Drop Site’s Julian Andreone went to the U.S. Senate to ask Democratic senators if they think party leadership is out of touch with the base. Hear what they had to say: Julian Andreone

Drop Site

11,085 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bernie Sanders says the quiet part out loud about the Democratic Party’s leadership. First, Sanders warned they’re so out of touch with working-class Americans that they’ll either be REPLACED or spark the rise of a new party altogether. But his next line said it all: “The current leadership of the Democratic, New York is a perfect example, where there should be enthusiasm and excitement, there is FEAR that working-class people, that ordinary people, are going to get involved and THREATEN the existence of the leadership here — their power.” In other words, Democratic Party leaders have no real interest in serving the working class. They don’t even want them involved in their politics because they’re TERRIFIED that if they do, they will challenge the Democratic Party’s old way of doing things and beat them in the battle of ideas. And this is the party that claims to stand for “democracy.”
0:47

Bernie Sanders says the quiet part out loud about the Democratic Party’s leadership. First, Sanders warned they’re so out of touch with working-class Americans that they’ll either be REPLACED or spark the rise of a new party altogether. But his next line said it all: “The current leadership of the Democratic, New York is a perfect example, where there should be enthusiasm and excitement, there is FEAR that working-class people, that ordinary people, are going to get involved and THREATEN the existence of the leadership here — their power.” In other words, Democratic Party leaders have no real interest in serving the working class. They don’t even want them involved in their politics because they’re TERRIFIED that if they do, they will challenge the Democratic Party’s old way of doing things and beat them in the battle of ideas. And this is the party that claims to stand for “democracy.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

504,185 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨NEW: David Friedberg explains why people have lost interest in the Democratic party (MUST WATCH) "I think the Democratic party has split into two parties: the democratic party *with* beliefs and the democratic party *without* beliefs. The Democratic party with beliefs is very far left and their beliefs are fundamentally rooted in socialism and marxism... The rest of the Democratic party, the "moderate party," really don't know what their beliefs are. Republicans know clearly what their beliefs are. Every member of the cabinet in DC we met with had the exact same message and exact same set of beliefs as to what this admin stands for and what they're trying to do... Because the moderates in the Democratic party have not stated a set of beliefs for their country/party, the party is effectively being represented by the part of the party that *does* have beliefs: the deeply socialist/marxist beliefs. They have subsumed the message and as a result this is why people have lost interest in the Democratic party..." 📸: david friedberg The All-In Podcast
2:35

🚨NEW: David Friedberg explains why people have lost interest in the Democratic party (MUST WATCH) "I think the Democratic party has split into two parties: the democratic party *with* beliefs and the democratic party *without* beliefs. The Democratic party with beliefs is very far left and their beliefs are fundamentally rooted in socialism and marxism... The rest of the Democratic party, the "moderate party," really don't know what their beliefs are. Republicans know clearly what their beliefs are. Every member of the cabinet in DC we met with had the exact same message and exact same set of beliefs as to what this admin stands for and what they're trying to do... Because the moderates in the Democratic party have not stated a set of beliefs for their country/party, the party is effectively being represented by the part of the party that *does* have beliefs: the deeply socialist/marxist beliefs. They have subsumed the message and as a result this is why people have lost interest in the Democratic party..." 📸: david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

2,317,516 次观看 • 1 年前

RFK Jr: Harris and Biden were both anointed by elites in a rigged process “The DNC, which is 400 elite members of the Democratic Party, decided who was gonna be president, which is President Biden, and they rigged the rules to make sure that there was no democracy. I grew up in a Democratic Party that was fighting to make sure every American got the right to vote for anybody that they wanted to vote for. Today’s Democratic Party is just the opposite. It’s spending hundreds of millions of dollars, [using] the courts, denial of Secret Service protection, all of these other mechanisms of power to make sure that President Biden doesn’t have anybody to run against. And now, Vice President Kamala Harris won’t have to deal with an authentic democracy.” From Piers Morgan Uncensored
1:03

RFK Jr: Harris and Biden were both anointed by elites in a rigged process “The DNC, which is 400 elite members of the Democratic Party, decided who was gonna be president, which is President Biden, and they rigged the rules to make sure that there was no democracy. I grew up in a Democratic Party that was fighting to make sure every American got the right to vote for anybody that they wanted to vote for. Today’s Democratic Party is just the opposite. It’s spending hundreds of millions of dollars, [using] the courts, denial of Secret Service protection, all of these other mechanisms of power to make sure that President Biden doesn’t have anybody to run against. And now, Vice President Kamala Harris won’t have to deal with an authentic democracy.” From Piers Morgan Uncensored

Holden Culotta

389,626 次观看 • 2 年前

Democrats who support Harris appear to think that her being a half-black woman makes her a unique and gifted politician. But Harris is the opposite of unique. She rose to the top by conforming, not standing out. Nor is she gifted. Throughout her political career, Harris hewed to the demands of Democratic interest groups and the political consultants who serve them. She inherited the political machine created by her former boyfriend, Willie Brown. As a result, Harris has avoided facing substantial competition, and the one time she did in 2020, voters resoundingly rejected her. Despite this rejection, Harris was handed a position as Vice President in what was widely perceived as a strategic move by Biden to put a black woman on the ticket. Holding Harris to low standards reflects the soft bigotry and patronizing attitude of Democrats toward minorities. Because the Party has essentially coddled Harris, she has not been forced to grow as a leader in ways she otherwise might have. That Harris is now consolidating support as Democrats’ best hope of defeating Trump points to a major legitimacy crisis for the Party, as well as for the media and the federal bureaucracies that are heavily aligned with it. It was only possible for such an unpopular candidate to gain the Party’s support because, since 2016, Democrats and the mainstream media have gone to extreme lengths to subvert democracy in order to target Trump. These lengths have included the Russia collusion disinformation campaign, mass censorship of political speech, attempts to criminalize political opposition, and an effort to prevent Trump from running for office again. All these activities have eroded the legitimacy of the state, the media, and the Party. Their legitimacy depends on public confidence. This confidence diminishes when these institutions so transparently undermine civil rights, fail to meet citizens’ needs and operate without integrity. The war on democracy led by Democrats, the press, and the “deep state” has, in this way, ultimately helped Trump gain support. At the same time, it has left Democrats without good options to defeat him. By favoring woke, racialist politics over a substantive political platform and by selecting nominees in an anti-democratic process for three presidential elections in a row, Democrats have been left with an extremely weak candidate. By consistently showing bias for over eight years, the mainstream media has lost prestige and is no longer in a position to shape and manipulate public opinion in favor of Harris. And, by weaponizing government against Trump and his supporters, federal agencies have inspired hatred and distrust among many members of the public who may view Harris as the anointed figurehead of this broken deep state bureaucracy.
2:21

Democrats who support Harris appear to think that her being a half-black woman makes her a unique and gifted politician. But Harris is the opposite of unique. She rose to the top by conforming, not standing out. Nor is she gifted. Throughout her political career, Harris hewed to the demands of Democratic interest groups and the political consultants who serve them. She inherited the political machine created by her former boyfriend, Willie Brown. As a result, Harris has avoided facing substantial competition, and the one time she did in 2020, voters resoundingly rejected her. Despite this rejection, Harris was handed a position as Vice President in what was widely perceived as a strategic move by Biden to put a black woman on the ticket. Holding Harris to low standards reflects the soft bigotry and patronizing attitude of Democrats toward minorities. Because the Party has essentially coddled Harris, she has not been forced to grow as a leader in ways she otherwise might have. That Harris is now consolidating support as Democrats’ best hope of defeating Trump points to a major legitimacy crisis for the Party, as well as for the media and the federal bureaucracies that are heavily aligned with it. It was only possible for such an unpopular candidate to gain the Party’s support because, since 2016, Democrats and the mainstream media have gone to extreme lengths to subvert democracy in order to target Trump. These lengths have included the Russia collusion disinformation campaign, mass censorship of political speech, attempts to criminalize political opposition, and an effort to prevent Trump from running for office again. All these activities have eroded the legitimacy of the state, the media, and the Party. Their legitimacy depends on public confidence. This confidence diminishes when these institutions so transparently undermine civil rights, fail to meet citizens’ needs and operate without integrity. The war on democracy led by Democrats, the press, and the “deep state” has, in this way, ultimately helped Trump gain support. At the same time, it has left Democrats without good options to defeat him. By favoring woke, racialist politics over a substantive political platform and by selecting nominees in an anti-democratic process for three presidential elections in a row, Democrats have been left with an extremely weak candidate. By consistently showing bias for over eight years, the mainstream media has lost prestige and is no longer in a position to shape and manipulate public opinion in favor of Harris. And, by weaponizing government against Trump and his supporters, federal agencies have inspired hatred and distrust among many members of the public who may view Harris as the anointed figurehead of this broken deep state bureaucracy.

Michael Shellenberger

1,716,001 次观看 • 2 年前

WOW. NBC’s Chuck Todd succinctly in two and a half minutes describes The Alignment in real time to viewers with the new Trump coalition adding working class Hispanics with a focus on the economy and education, not “Latinx”: Todd: Iowa pollster Ann Selzer “thought she found something with...independent women...I don’t know if it’s enough to make up for the loss of voters of color that have — clearly — I mean, that is — that continues, to me, to be the big story of the night is the shift among Hispanics. Look, Hispanic voters are swing voters and I think, you know, what's interesting here it is the Republican Party treated them the same way they treated white, working class voters. They courted them the same they treated white, working class voters. The Democratic Party has spent a lot of time treating it as an identity group. And, you know, whether it's latinx, which sort of fell flat and so, there’s been a lot of hand-wringing inside Democratic circles. A real split like, you know, it was a total misread sort of by the coastal strategists when it comes to how to target working class voters of color. And I think we’re starting to see sort of a working class coalition start to drift to the right. You know, before, Donald Trump had working class whites. Now? He’s adding working class Hispanics and working class — not necessary seeing evidence of working class African Americans — but adding working class Hispanics. That becomes a very durable majority...It doesn’t matter your ethnicity. It matters your education...Latino voters, in many ways, same — are driven by the same issues and there’s one issue in particular actually that Republicans align closer with Latino — or Latino voters align with conservative — with conservative party and that's school choice. And that has been -- and you can't help but wonder both Florida and Texas has been aggressive about expanding school choice. Where have Republicans made the greatest gains amongst Hispanic voters? Florida and Texas. So, education and economy, those issues — bread and butter issues and that is how they talk to them. Not saying Democrats weren't, but for the sort of cultural issues don't play as well with Hispanic voters as they may with college-educated whites or even African Americans.”
2:39

WOW. NBC’s Chuck Todd succinctly in two and a half minutes describes The Alignment in real time to viewers with the new Trump coalition adding working class Hispanics with a focus on the economy and education, not “Latinx”: Todd: Iowa pollster Ann Selzer “thought she found something with...independent women...I don’t know if it’s enough to make up for the loss of voters of color that have — clearly — I mean, that is — that continues, to me, to be the big story of the night is the shift among Hispanics. Look, Hispanic voters are swing voters and I think, you know, what's interesting here it is the Republican Party treated them the same way they treated white, working class voters. They courted them the same they treated white, working class voters. The Democratic Party has spent a lot of time treating it as an identity group. And, you know, whether it's latinx, which sort of fell flat and so, there’s been a lot of hand-wringing inside Democratic circles. A real split like, you know, it was a total misread sort of by the coastal strategists when it comes to how to target working class voters of color. And I think we’re starting to see sort of a working class coalition start to drift to the right. You know, before, Donald Trump had working class whites. Now? He’s adding working class Hispanics and working class — not necessary seeing evidence of working class African Americans — but adding working class Hispanics. That becomes a very durable majority...It doesn’t matter your ethnicity. It matters your education...Latino voters, in many ways, same — are driven by the same issues and there’s one issue in particular actually that Republicans align closer with Latino — or Latino voters align with conservative — with conservative party and that's school choice. And that has been -- and you can't help but wonder both Florida and Texas has been aggressive about expanding school choice. Where have Republicans made the greatest gains amongst Hispanic voters? Florida and Texas. So, education and economy, those issues — bread and butter issues and that is how they talk to them. Not saying Democrats weren't, but for the sort of cultural issues don't play as well with Hispanic voters as they may with college-educated whites or even African Americans.”

Curtis Houck

2,802,023 次观看 • 1 年前

Vice President Kamala Harris gave Louisiana voters a shoutout while speaking with organizers in Wisconsin on Monday night. Highlighting the power in our Black turnout on Saturday. Make no mistake—Louisiana voters sent a powerful message to NotGOVJeffLandry. Black and white working-class voters came together and said NO on all four amendments. This moment should be a wake-up call for the national party and national donors: it’s time to take Louisiana seriously. It’s time to invest in building a new battleground state—here in the Deep South. The People made it clear they want policy that improves lives. They made it clear they don’t want to see our kids over-incarcerated. Communities mobilized—online and on the ground—to move others to action. And together, The People defeated Jeff Landry’s Big Business and Pro Jail agenda. The People have the power. Now let’s build on this momentum and expand what’s possible for the people of Louisiana. The South has something to say.
0:50

Vice President Kamala Harris gave Louisiana voters a shoutout while speaking with organizers in Wisconsin on Monday night. Highlighting the power in our Black turnout on Saturday. Make no mistake—Louisiana voters sent a powerful message to NotGOVJeffLandry. Black and white working-class voters came together and said NO on all four amendments. This moment should be a wake-up call for the national party and national donors: it’s time to take Louisiana seriously. It’s time to invest in building a new battleground state—here in the Deep South. The People made it clear they want policy that improves lives. They made it clear they don’t want to see our kids over-incarcerated. Communities mobilized—online and on the ground—to move others to action. And together, The People defeated Jeff Landry’s Big Business and Pro Jail agenda. The People have the power. Now let’s build on this momentum and expand what’s possible for the people of Louisiana. The South has something to say.

Gary Chambers

33,672 次观看 • 1 年前

Former Clinton adviser and Former California State Senator warns that the Democrat party is on the verge of collapse: Gloria Romero: "I believe that in history we are seeing a major inflection point, the complete collapsing of the Democratic Party. This party refuse this to recognize that it has lost its way. Whether a new party emerges that will wait to be seen." Doug Schoen: "Democrats have created the great greatest deficit in history. And it's ultimately what cost Kamala Harris and the Democrats control of the White House and the Congress. We need a fiscally prudent Democratic Party that focuses on people's economic concerns." Gabriela Berrospi: "The Democrat Party, I cannot recognize it. I'm a former Democrat. Latinos voted in this election with their wallets. We didn't vote for pronouns. We voted for our paychecks. We voted for safety. We voted with our Catholic values. And the Democrat Party does not represent that. They've really lost us." Christmas cheer is coming early this year.
3:23

Former Clinton adviser and Former California State Senator warns that the Democrat party is on the verge of collapse: Gloria Romero: "I believe that in history we are seeing a major inflection point, the complete collapsing of the Democratic Party. This party refuse this to recognize that it has lost its way. Whether a new party emerges that will wait to be seen." Doug Schoen: "Democrats have created the great greatest deficit in history. And it's ultimately what cost Kamala Harris and the Democrats control of the White House and the Congress. We need a fiscally prudent Democratic Party that focuses on people's economic concerns." Gabriela Berrospi: "The Democrat Party, I cannot recognize it. I'm a former Democrat. Latinos voted in this election with their wallets. We didn't vote for pronouns. We voted for our paychecks. We voted for safety. We voted with our Catholic values. And the Democrat Party does not represent that. They've really lost us." Christmas cheer is coming early this year.

Eric Abbenante

525,613 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith WARNS Dems they're set to lose in 2026 and 2028 as Republicans *DOMINATE* podcast space🚨 "This is why the GOP are sitting pretty right now. It’s not just because of the power that they have in office with a president that won the popular vote, the Electoral College vote and every swing state — and increased with black voters, young voters, Hispanic voters, etc." "It’s also because their voices are resonating better. If you look at a lot of voices on the GOP side, they're a lot more popular than the voices on the left." "So the left is gonna have to figure that out." "They're gonna have to gain or elevate in the realm of populism in order to ultimately resonate and really, really make a dent to the way and in the fashion that they're hoping to do so." "If they don't pull that off on a national scale — if they don't pull that off — it's going to amount to nothing." "They'll lose the midterms, they'll lose the general election in 2028." Daily Caller
0:50

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith WARNS Dems they're set to lose in 2026 and 2028 as Republicans *DOMINATE* podcast space🚨 "This is why the GOP are sitting pretty right now. It’s not just because of the power that they have in office with a president that won the popular vote, the Electoral College vote and every swing state — and increased with black voters, young voters, Hispanic voters, etc." "It’s also because their voices are resonating better. If you look at a lot of voices on the GOP side, they're a lot more popular than the voices on the left." "So the left is gonna have to figure that out." "They're gonna have to gain or elevate in the realm of populism in order to ultimately resonate and really, really make a dent to the way and in the fashion that they're hoping to do so." "If they don't pull that off on a national scale — if they don't pull that off — it's going to amount to nothing." "They'll lose the midterms, they'll lose the general election in 2028." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

165,486 次观看 • 1 年前

.Brianna Lyman on why Platner dropping out would be different than Joe Biden dropping out... "I think they were because the circumstances right now for Platner is that there were a lot of these controversies out before the primary happened, and none of those caused Democrats like Bernie Sanders, like Ro Khanna, to take away their endorsements. So, they went into this primary knowing full well that there was a lot of problems, to all of Jason's points earlier, and they still endorsed him. And so now, Abby, to your question about Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and now I think that for a party that constantly talks about democracy, they don't necessarily do it well all the time because Maine voters did hear all of this and still went out and chose Graham Platner. So I think it's a tough sell now for the Democratic Party to say, we're going to anoint someone. I would also suspect that probably the Maine Democratic Party has some kind of internal polling, because it clearly wasn't enough polling or concern during the primary season for them to put this amount of pressure, but they probably have some internal polling showing this will be a blowout for Susan Collins with him in."
0:55

.Brianna Lyman on why Platner dropping out would be different than Joe Biden dropping out... "I think they were because the circumstances right now for Platner is that there were a lot of these controversies out before the primary happened, and none of those caused Democrats like Bernie Sanders, like Ro Khanna, to take away their endorsements. So, they went into this primary knowing full well that there was a lot of problems, to all of Jason's points earlier, and they still endorsed him. And so now, Abby, to your question about Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and now I think that for a party that constantly talks about democracy, they don't necessarily do it well all the time because Maine voters did hear all of this and still went out and chose Graham Platner. So I think it's a tough sell now for the Democratic Party to say, we're going to anoint someone. I would also suspect that probably the Maine Democratic Party has some kind of internal polling, because it clearly wasn't enough polling or concern during the primary season for them to put this amount of pressure, but they probably have some internal polling showing this will be a blowout for Susan Collins with him in."

Curtis Houck

15,559 次观看 • 1 个月前

I am calling on Jay Jacobs, Chair of the New York State Democratic Party, to take decisive action and remove the Working Families Party (WFP) and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) from the Democratic Party line. These organizations are not Democrats. They are socialists who rebrand themselves as Democrats to mislead voters — but their platform and values do not reflect those of traditional Democrats. This is not about progress — it’s about pushing a radical, far-left agenda that leans more toward communism than the core principles of the Democratic Party. Real Democrats believe in law and order, economic opportunity, and protecting working families without tearing down the entire system. I’m also urging major donors to reconsider their contributions to the New York State Democratic Party until it takes a stand and restores integrity. New Yorkers deserve a party that represents their values — not one hijacked by extremists.
4:11

I am calling on Jay Jacobs, Chair of the New York State Democratic Party, to take decisive action and remove the Working Families Party (WFP) and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) from the Democratic Party line. These organizations are not Democrats. They are socialists who rebrand themselves as Democrats to mislead voters — but their platform and values do not reflect those of traditional Democrats. This is not about progress — it’s about pushing a radical, far-left agenda that leans more toward communism than the core principles of the Democratic Party. Real Democrats believe in law and order, economic opportunity, and protecting working families without tearing down the entire system. I’m also urging major donors to reconsider their contributions to the New York State Democratic Party until it takes a stand and restores integrity. New Yorkers deserve a party that represents their values — not one hijacked by extremists.

Lattina Brown, MPA 🇯🇲🇺🇸

45,299 次观看 • 1 年前

With less than two weeks until Election Day, the final national poll by the New York Times and Siena College shows Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump in a dead heat for the popular vote. On Friday, the two candidates shifted their focus from swing states to the Lone Star State — Texas. Trump has escalated his anti-immigration rhetoric in the final stretch of the race, calling the U.S. a “dumping ground” and “like a garbage can for the world” at an Austin campaign event. Ahead of a rally with megastar Beyoncé in Houston, Harris told reporters that Trump "belittles our country" with his remarks. “This is someone who is a former president of the United States, who has a bully pulpit," Harris said. "And this is how he uses it, to tell the rest of the world that somehow the United States of America is trash?”
3:26

With less than two weeks until Election Day, the final national poll by the New York Times and Siena College shows Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump in a dead heat for the popular vote. On Friday, the two candidates shifted their focus from swing states to the Lone Star State — Texas. Trump has escalated his anti-immigration rhetoric in the final stretch of the race, calling the U.S. a “dumping ground” and “like a garbage can for the world” at an Austin campaign event. Ahead of a rally with megastar Beyoncé in Houston, Harris told reporters that Trump "belittles our country" with his remarks. “This is someone who is a former president of the United States, who has a bully pulpit," Harris said. "And this is how he uses it, to tell the rest of the world that somehow the United States of America is trash?”

PBS News

11,339 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 UPDATE: Speaker Johnson has HAD IT with Chuck Schumer holding the government hostage for illegal aliens and catering to AOC and Bernie Sanders "What’s even WORSE is that the supposed reason for this stunt is healthcare - which THEY themselves have singlehandedly made more expensive and less accessible!" Democrats destroy their image in the eyes of the public more and more every day. AOC and Bernie have no strategy. "Those ARE the real leaders of the Democrat Party. We all know it. AOC and Bernie. Good luck with that!" "Bernie Sanders and AOC said the quiet part out loud: they DON'T KNOW what they want to end this shutdown! They couldn't provide a single viable solution for the mess that they themselves have gleefully created." 💯
0:42

🚨 UPDATE: Speaker Johnson has HAD IT with Chuck Schumer holding the government hostage for illegal aliens and catering to AOC and Bernie Sanders "What’s even WORSE is that the supposed reason for this stunt is healthcare - which THEY themselves have singlehandedly made more expensive and less accessible!" Democrats destroy their image in the eyes of the public more and more every day. AOC and Bernie have no strategy. "Those ARE the real leaders of the Democrat Party. We all know it. AOC and Bernie. Good luck with that!" "Bernie Sanders and AOC said the quiet part out loud: they DON'T KNOW what they want to end this shutdown! They couldn't provide a single viable solution for the mess that they themselves have gleefully created." 💯

Eric Daugherty

200,125 次观看 • 10 个月前

This is actually crazy Chad Bianco reveals how Democrats got voters to pass letting people steal up to $850 with no consequences Democrats knew voters would never vote for it, so instead they named it “The Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative” and voters were tricked into voting for it “Prop 47 made felonies, misdemeanors, misdemeanors, infractions, or not crimes anymore. It increased the, the level of theft to where it was a crime to that $950 threshold. And so that enabled just crime to just run rampant. It. It was profitable now to be a criminal, and there was no consequence” He says Gavin Newsom did this deception on purpose, “Never would the voters agree to that — The voters would never, ever, ever go for that -1 So what they did is they let you pass it and they gave you this sheet of paper and a ballot next to it with yes or no. And they said, ‘do you want safe schools and safe streets?’ And you said, yes, I do. And you said Yes. And that's what Prop 47 was. It was the Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative that our attorney General Kamala Harris at the time, our Secretary of State” “They lied to us and convinced us as voters to make that a law. And the thing that happens after that is that law can never be changed unless the voters change it. The lawmakers in Sacramento can't change a law that the voters put into place. So they lied to us. But why are they allowed to put deceiving descriptions on these laws? Because government made their own another law that said it was okay to lie to you.” Democrats are the party of criminals
2:08

This is actually crazy Chad Bianco reveals how Democrats got voters to pass letting people steal up to $850 with no consequences Democrats knew voters would never vote for it, so instead they named it “The Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative” and voters were tricked into voting for it “Prop 47 made felonies, misdemeanors, misdemeanors, infractions, or not crimes anymore. It increased the, the level of theft to where it was a crime to that $950 threshold. And so that enabled just crime to just run rampant. It. It was profitable now to be a criminal, and there was no consequence” He says Gavin Newsom did this deception on purpose, “Never would the voters agree to that — The voters would never, ever, ever go for that -1 So what they did is they let you pass it and they gave you this sheet of paper and a ballot next to it with yes or no. And they said, ‘do you want safe schools and safe streets?’ And you said, yes, I do. And you said Yes. And that's what Prop 47 was. It was the Safe Schools and the Safe Streets initiative that our attorney General Kamala Harris at the time, our Secretary of State” “They lied to us and convinced us as voters to make that a law. And the thing that happens after that is that law can never be changed unless the voters change it. The lawmakers in Sacramento can't change a law that the voters put into place. So they lied to us. But why are they allowed to put deceiving descriptions on these laws? Because government made their own another law that said it was okay to lie to you.” Democrats are the party of criminals

Wall Street Apes

99,370 次观看 • 4 个月前