Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Since this W5 exposé on baggage security gaps at Pearson, has anyone seen a statement from the CEO for Pearson or the Minister of Transport? Or are they operating by the theory that no one is really in charge, and thus it’s not up to them to take responsibility?

29,283 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A Democrat Tennessee state rep. just openly called to abolish ICE on CNN. Scott Jennings let him hang himself with his own words. Scott Jennings asked Justin Pearson a series of questions — NONE of which he had an answer for. PEARSON: “This administration cannot be trusted and they can’t be trusted to hold themselves accountable.” “Even after the killing of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, they didn’t want to share information about what was happening, which is why we have to abolish ICE.” “We have to abolish the Customs and Border Patrol and the way they currently exist, and replace them with something that actually does the work that we need for them to, which is why we need a Congress—” JENNINGS: “Which work is that, by the way?” PEARSON: “I’ll tell you what the work is not, the work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. You said the work we need them to do. I’m interested in your opinion. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “The work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “Well, first let’s look at what they don’t need to do. They don’t need to go into communities like Memphis, Tennessee.” JENNINGS: “Do they need to deport illegal aliens? Do they need to deport illegal aliens?! Can you say it?” “Can you say it?” “Do we need a federal law enforcement agency to deport illegal aliens, yes or no?” PEARSON: “We do need a federal law enforcement agency that deals with immigration that doesn’t kill people.” JENNINGS: “Is there a single illegal alien that you would deport?” “Name one. Is there one?” “So the answer is no?” “Is the Democratic position for 26, that there are no illegal aliens that should be deported?”

Overton

224,199 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I cannot let the deceit and arrogance of the divisive ‘yes’ campaign for the voice to Parliament referendum go unchallenged! This behaviour was on full display yesterday with Noel Pearson’s disgusting rant on a stream hosted by The Australian newspaper. Pearson dismissed the uncounted Australian families struggling with Labor’s cost-of-living crisis. He likened the referendum to Halley’s Comet of all things, saying it had no respect for inflation. He’s effectively saying: stuff the Australian people going hungry and homeless because giving Pearson racially-exclusive power in the Constitution is far more important. He said indigenous people in remote communities were also struggling, but didn’t say why. I’ll tell you why they’re struggling: because the elites and activists of the aboriginal industry like Pearson are responsible for it. They are responsible for entrenching disadvantage so their taxpayer gravy train can keep going. What Australians are really being asked at this referendum is to enshrine this corrupt gravy train in the Constitution so it can never be removed. Billions of dollars per year for decades, with the gaps as wide as ever and indigenous Australians still languishing in poverty and violence in the economic dead-ends that are remote communities. The voice will not be the ‘different’ approach that will close the gaps. It will be more of the same failure and corruption, stuck in the Constitution for all time. Pearson repeated the claim the ‘race power’ in the Constitution could discriminate against Aboriginal people. I’d like to see an example of that today! If anything, it discriminates against non-indigenous people. It enables laws supporting native title, for one, as well as the many billions of dollars flowing uselessly to close the gaps. With breathtaking irony, Pearson said race was an outdated concept. Section 51 part 26 permits this Parliament to make ‘special laws’ for members of a race for whom it is deemed necessary. Pearson said that with this power, it’s only right to talk to indigenous Australians. He’s not wrong, except for decades now that is precisely what has happened and Pearson has been heavily involved in this process along with other voice campaigners. The failure to close the gaps lies at his feet, those of his fellow elites, and the thousands of indigenous corporations, charities and land councils preying on the Australian taxpayer. More importantly, the ‘race power’ could just be repealed. The Parliament would then not have the power to make special laws based on race – laws which Pearson said could be ‘discriminatory’ and which Marcia Langton said could ‘harm’ indigenous people. I’m supremely confident a referendum to get rid of the race power would enjoy as much support as the 1967 referendum. Equal laws for all, and special laws for none. Equal rights for all, and special rights for none. That would be true equality for all Australians, and would eliminate a constitutional power based on a concept Pearson said was ‘outdated’. At the same referendum we should also repeal Section 25, a dead letter giving this Parliament the power to disqualify races from voting. It’s offensive and should not be in the Constitution. Enough is enough. This is not the 19th century and Australia is no longer a bunch of British colonies in which indigenous people were treated so poorly. This is the 21st century, in which Australia is a modern nation which is completely inclusive of indigenous people. The development of this nation has brought wealth, technology, institutions, democracy and civilisation to indigenous Australians who were a stone age culture in 1788. Most indigenous people have embraced this modern society and enjoy the same empowerment, agency and prosperity that comes with it. Pearson is one of them. So are the elite extremists like Megan Davis, Thomas Mayo and Marcia Langton. Marcia Langton has promised no more ‘welcomes to country’ if the Australian people reject the voice. I can’t think of a better reason to vote ‘no’, except for one: we’re all human, all Australian, and we must be united rather than forever divided by race.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

141,330 просмотров • 2 лет назад