Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Sitting next to Peter Thiel’s android JD Vance, Stephen Miller makes an impassioned case for creating a surveillance state and registering undesirables using “technology invented 20 years ago”—which is code for Palantir. THIS is the fight. Not culture wars. “…on data sharing and technology and integrity. You can solve... 95% of this problem with simple technological verification and data sharing measures that is in technology that was invented 20 years ago. Now, the technology today, of course, is even more astonishing. But if every single person who wanted to enroll in Snap or enroll Medicaid or enroll in Public Housing was in a shared database that the federal government had access to to verify age, citizenship, criminal record, other basic biographic facts that single-step alone would save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars. And you have to ask yourself, why would any politician oppose something so fundamental not even debating eligibility rules? An important but separate debate. We are debating whether or not a person is lying to the government to extract funds for which they are plainly and clearly ineligible that time has come to implement these reforms. Thank you, Mr. Vice President.”show more

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

155,733 subscribers

336,117 views • 23 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 JUST NOW: Stephen Miller says Congress should STEP UP and FORCE all 50 states to hand over SNAP, Medicaid and welfare data — so the federal government can block fraud and noncitizens "You have to ask yourself why would ANY politician oppose something so fundamental, not even debating eligibility rules...you're debating whether or not a person is LYING to the government to extract funds for which they are plainly, clearly ineligible." COMMON SENSE. "If every single person who wanted to enroll in SNAP or enroll in Medicaid or enroll in public housing was in a shared database that the federal government had access to, to verify age, citizenship, criminal record, other basic biographic facts, that single step alone would save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars!" "The time has come to implement these reforms." 🔥

🚨 JUST NOW: Stephen Miller says Congress should STEP UP and FORCE all 50 states to hand over SNAP, Medicaid and welfare data — so the federal government can block fraud and noncitizens "You have to ask yourself why would ANY politician oppose something so fundamental, not even debating eligibility rules...you're debating whether or not a person is LYING to the government to extract funds for which they are plainly, clearly ineligible." COMMON SENSE. "If every single person who wanted to enroll in SNAP or enroll in Medicaid or enroll in public housing was in a shared database that the federal government had access to, to verify age, citizenship, criminal record, other basic biographic facts, that single step alone would save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars!" "The time has come to implement these reforms." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

91,935 views • 23 days ago

🚨 JUST IN: It's just been announced that nationwide SNAP food stamps enrollment has PLUMMETED by -5.3 million in the last year after new anti-fraud protections and work requirements GREAT NEWS! SNAP is meant to be temporary, NOT a way of life 👏🏻 Stephen Miller nailed it: "If every single person who wanted to enroll in SNAP or enroll in Medicaid or enroll in public housing was in a shared database that the federal government had access to, to verify age, citizenship, criminal record, other basic biographic facts, that single step alone would save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars!" 🔥 Keep purging the rolls! SNAP fraud is FINALLY being crushed.

🚨 JUST IN: It's just been announced that nationwide SNAP food stamps enrollment has PLUMMETED by -5.3 million in the last year after new anti-fraud protections and work requirements GREAT NEWS! SNAP is meant to be temporary, NOT a way of life 👏🏻 Stephen Miller nailed it: "If every single person who wanted to enroll in SNAP or enroll in Medicaid or enroll in public housing was in a shared database that the federal government had access to, to verify age, citizenship, criminal record, other basic biographic facts, that single step alone would save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars!" 🔥 Keep purging the rolls! SNAP fraud is FINALLY being crushed.

Eric Daugherty

198,652 views • 16 days ago

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

The SCIF

20,292 views • 6 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott just MIC DROPPED Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, who is suing Abbott for not extraditing an ICE agent for prosecution "Ellison has NO credibility! He is in a state that may be the national leader in committing FRAUD against the United States of American against American taxpayers!" "Now Minnesota is being investigated for about $9 BILLION dollars in fraud in their Medicaid system and other federal programs." "And so they are the last people to put any credibility on whatsoever!" "When you go through the extradition process, the governor has the authority to consider four factors, three of which are pretty much just pro forma paperwork, the fourth of which however, is whether or not that the person being sought to be extradited is a fugitive." "And there are certain facts that you look at to determine whether or not that person is or is not a fugitive. That is a fact finding decision by the governor, in this case myself, that I've assigned to be investigated that investigation is taking place right now. Based upon that investigation, I'll be more informed about what decision to make."

🚨 JUST IN: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott just MIC DROPPED Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, who is suing Abbott for not extraditing an ICE agent for prosecution "Ellison has NO credibility! He is in a state that may be the national leader in committing FRAUD against the United States of American against American taxpayers!" "Now Minnesota is being investigated for about $9 BILLION dollars in fraud in their Medicaid system and other federal programs." "And so they are the last people to put any credibility on whatsoever!" "When you go through the extradition process, the governor has the authority to consider four factors, three of which are pretty much just pro forma paperwork, the fourth of which however, is whether or not that the person being sought to be extradited is a fugitive." "And there are certain facts that you look at to determine whether or not that person is or is not a fugitive. That is a fact finding decision by the governor, in this case myself, that I've assigned to be investigated that investigation is taking place right now. Based upon that investigation, I'll be more informed about what decision to make."

Eric Daugherty

36,254 views • 8 days ago

Bill Gates says he's staking whatever reputation he has on AI being the one technology that truly breaks from history "Anyone who analogizes AI as a technology to other technologies is missing that this time is different. And saying something is different, there's a very high bar for that." "But I'm staking whatever reputation I have saying this time is different, that something that exceeds human cognition, not just in one area like farming or mathematics, but across the board, and then in a few years' time will be coupled with fairly low-cost, quite capable humanoid robotics." "That is a more profound change to our economy and jobs than anything in my lifetime by a dramatic amount." "And so the past is kind of there to fool you if you think this technology is similar to other ones, some of which I had the privilege to be involved with, the microprocessor, personal computer, internet." "And even though you have to be careful with those a bit, overwhelmingly those were good technologies, and overwhelmingly that led to net job creation."

Bill Gates says he's staking whatever reputation he has on AI being the one technology that truly breaks from history "Anyone who analogizes AI as a technology to other technologies is missing that this time is different. And saying something is different, there's a very high bar for that." "But I'm staking whatever reputation I have saying this time is different, that something that exceeds human cognition, not just in one area like farming or mathematics, but across the board, and then in a few years' time will be coupled with fairly low-cost, quite capable humanoid robotics." "That is a more profound change to our economy and jobs than anything in my lifetime by a dramatic amount." "And so the past is kind of there to fool you if you think this technology is similar to other ones, some of which I had the privilege to be involved with, the microprocessor, personal computer, internet." "And even though you have to be careful with those a bit, overwhelmingly those were good technologies, and overwhelmingly that led to net job creation."

Fireside Alpha

374,835 views • 1 day ago

PALANTIR CEO ALEX KARP: “The Palantir Platform, despite what you may read at The New York Times, is actually the most secure, the hardest platform in the world to manipulate and change. Of course any technology can be abused. But if you wanted to abuse a technology, if you wanted to use the deep state to unlawfully surveil people, the last platform in the world you would pick is Palantir because of the granular way we segment and put together and the security models and the access control models that are in Foundry natively.”

PALANTIR CEO ALEX KARP: “The Palantir Platform, despite what you may read at The New York Times, is actually the most secure, the hardest platform in the world to manipulate and change. Of course any technology can be abused. But if you wanted to abuse a technology, if you wanted to use the deep state to unlawfully surveil people, the last platform in the world you would pick is Palantir because of the granular way we segment and put together and the security models and the access control models that are in Foundry natively.”

amit

259,088 views • 1 year ago

DARPA and the CIA's new "MKULTRA project" mixed with A.I. and the construction of smart cities to incorporate a complete grid of control over the population. You wonder why they are starting the infrastructure for smart cities around the world. Minority Report wasn't just a movie. It was a warning of things to come. A grid of control that can not only monitor your finances and take away your privacy with security cameras, but technology that can literally induce emotions and behaviors and read and write thoughts in real time completely remotely. Through electromagnetic radiation, radio frequency, extremely-low frequency, light technology, 5G, A.I., smart wearable technology, like wireless earbuds, and smartwatches that measures changes in blood flow, etc., there are multiple technologies that they have been working on since the late 1950s that they have already mastered, to new technology that has now incorporated A.I. that can do things which once seemed impossible or of science fiction. The technology is already here and they are already quietly passing laws in an attempt to safe guard you literal brain privacy. Colorado was the first state to introduce such legislation. The WEF also talked about this extensively. This doesn't just allow governments and intel agencies to spy or control you, this also applies to big tech, making you feel a specific emotion when you read a specific political article, or implant an impulse to buy, something, or even do something sinister. These are the new systems of control they are implementing on us. It sounds unreal, but the reality is that it's already here and being used on you and you don't even know it.

DARPA and the CIA's new "MKULTRA project" mixed with A.I. and the construction of smart cities to incorporate a complete grid of control over the population. You wonder why they are starting the infrastructure for smart cities around the world. Minority Report wasn't just a movie. It was a warning of things to come. A grid of control that can not only monitor your finances and take away your privacy with security cameras, but technology that can literally induce emotions and behaviors and read and write thoughts in real time completely remotely. Through electromagnetic radiation, radio frequency, extremely-low frequency, light technology, 5G, A.I., smart wearable technology, like wireless earbuds, and smartwatches that measures changes in blood flow, etc., there are multiple technologies that they have been working on since the late 1950s that they have already mastered, to new technology that has now incorporated A.I. that can do things which once seemed impossible or of science fiction. The technology is already here and they are already quietly passing laws in an attempt to safe guard you literal brain privacy. Colorado was the first state to introduce such legislation. The WEF also talked about this extensively. This doesn't just allow governments and intel agencies to spy or control you, this also applies to big tech, making you feel a specific emotion when you read a specific political article, or implant an impulse to buy, something, or even do something sinister. These are the new systems of control they are implementing on us. It sounds unreal, but the reality is that it's already here and being used on you and you don't even know it.

The SCIF

72,616 views • 9 months ago

“A project that has been in the top 10 for 8 years straight, has never gone down, has honored its commitments, is the most decentralized cryptocurrency on the planet, the best on chain government, that’s sitting on basically a billion dollars of value on an on-chain treasury, that has a phenomenal technical roadmap and an army of engineers to implement that, is NOT dead. And anybody who tells you that is retarded.” “Now we can complain about it, or solve the problem” Charles Hoskinson at his finest. You have to love this guys passion and commitment to Cardano $ADA I would love to meet you in person one day sir.

“A project that has been in the top 10 for 8 years straight, has never gone down, has honored its commitments, is the most decentralized cryptocurrency on the planet, the best on chain government, that’s sitting on basically a billion dollars of value on an on-chain treasury, that has a phenomenal technical roadmap and an army of engineers to implement that, is NOT dead. And anybody who tells you that is retarded.” “Now we can complain about it, or solve the problem” Charles Hoskinson at his finest. You have to love this guys passion and commitment to Cardano $ADA I would love to meet you in person one day sir.

Hard Money Research

48,590 views • 10 months ago

AOC on Medicare Advantage: In theory, agents and brokers work with everyday people enrolling in a plan and are there to help them pick the best plan for their health, right? That’s how it’s supposed to be set up. What gets complicated is that agents and brokers are paid by health insurers for enrolling individuals in specific plans. And so you’re supposed to have agents and brokers talking to your mom or your grandparent, saying, “We’d like to enroll you. We think this plan is what’s best for you.” But what that person doesn’t know is that UnitedHealthcare is saying, “We’ll give you a vacation if you enroll people in our plan,” or, “We’ll give you a couple of extra hundred dollars if you enroll someone in a Blue Cross Blue Shield plan, a United plan, or any number of other plans.” And in your testimony, you stated that agents and brokers received $10 billion in this kind of compensation in 2022 alone, right? That’s $10 billion in taxpayer money. A lot of it is being funneled through these corporations. And so that is money that is not going to care. It’s going to perks, trips to Boca, and financial incentives for brokers to enroll people out of traditional Medicare and into for-profit Medicare Advantage plans.

AOC on Medicare Advantage: In theory, agents and brokers work with everyday people enrolling in a plan and are there to help them pick the best plan for their health, right? That’s how it’s supposed to be set up. What gets complicated is that agents and brokers are paid by health insurers for enrolling individuals in specific plans. And so you’re supposed to have agents and brokers talking to your mom or your grandparent, saying, “We’d like to enroll you. We think this plan is what’s best for you.” But what that person doesn’t know is that UnitedHealthcare is saying, “We’ll give you a vacation if you enroll people in our plan,” or, “We’ll give you a couple of extra hundred dollars if you enroll someone in a Blue Cross Blue Shield plan, a United plan, or any number of other plans.” And in your testimony, you stated that agents and brokers received $10 billion in this kind of compensation in 2022 alone, right? That’s $10 billion in taxpayer money. A lot of it is being funneled through these corporations. And so that is money that is not going to care. It’s going to perks, trips to Boca, and financial incentives for brokers to enroll people out of traditional Medicare and into for-profit Medicare Advantage plans.

Acyn

55,668 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | India AI Impact Summit 2026 | Delhi: Founder Chairman and CEO of Sampark Foundation & former CEO of HCL Technologies, Vineet Nayar says, "...From an employment point of view I think it is very important for us to understand that Indian companies, including Indian IT companies, are going to be profit-driven and therefore if you believe that they are going to create employment you must be dreaming. Therefore, the question is how do we create employment in this environment, and that employment comes from mass scale startups, which is what this government has already doing. So, how do we create new sets of people who are trying to solve new sets of problems not new sets of technology and if we do that we will get it right. I think we as Indians have to be very careful on who does data belong to and that is the debate we have a problem with. The LLM models which exist worldwide are far superior than the Indian models. Unfortunately, in India, we never develop products, so therefore we do not have SLMs and LLMs which are world-class. On one side, we have global LLM products which are coming to India and trading on our Indian data. Should we allowed that or should we not allowed that? But on the other side if we don't allow that then we have the data but we don't have the LLM models. So, how do we encourage technology completely to develop the LLM models. This needs radicals strategic thinking and a very important aspect otherwise we will either give up a data. So, I think it's a very critical aspect for us to think about - who does this data belong, what is the kind of incentives we are going to give to develop LLM technologies or SLM technologies fast so that we train on our data otherwise an LLM will come in with our data and we'll immediately see return and we'll celebrate and we will do all these kind of press releases but the India will lose a competitive advantage on something which is very critical for the next decade."

#WATCH | India AI Impact Summit 2026 | Delhi: Founder Chairman and CEO of Sampark Foundation & former CEO of HCL Technologies, Vineet Nayar says, "...From an employment point of view I think it is very important for us to understand that Indian companies, including Indian IT companies, are going to be profit-driven and therefore if you believe that they are going to create employment you must be dreaming. Therefore, the question is how do we create employment in this environment, and that employment comes from mass scale startups, which is what this government has already doing. So, how do we create new sets of people who are trying to solve new sets of problems not new sets of technology and if we do that we will get it right. I think we as Indians have to be very careful on who does data belong to and that is the debate we have a problem with. The LLM models which exist worldwide are far superior than the Indian models. Unfortunately, in India, we never develop products, so therefore we do not have SLMs and LLMs which are world-class. On one side, we have global LLM products which are coming to India and trading on our Indian data. Should we allowed that or should we not allowed that? But on the other side if we don't allow that then we have the data but we don't have the LLM models. So, how do we encourage technology completely to develop the LLM models. This needs radicals strategic thinking and a very important aspect otherwise we will either give up a data. So, I think it's a very critical aspect for us to think about - who does this data belong, what is the kind of incentives we are going to give to develop LLM technologies or SLM technologies fast so that we train on our data otherwise an LLM will come in with our data and we'll immediately see return and we'll celebrate and we will do all these kind of press releases but the India will lose a competitive advantage on something which is very critical for the next decade."

ANI

18,753 views • 6 months ago

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 views • 5 months ago

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 views • 9 months ago

🇺🇸 VP VANCE: "MOST IMPORTANT WARFIGHTING TECH? A WELL-ARMED U.S. MARINE" "We’ve got boats, we’ve got airplanes, and we’ve got United States Marines. But let’s be honest, we all know the battlefield has changed in an incredible and profound way. We’ve got technology that, even when I was a little kid, would have been inconceivable, and now it’s driving the face of the modern battlefield. We’ve got cybersecurity. We’ve got satellites in space. We’ve got AI. We’ve got all this incredible technology. And of course, the U.S. is the most significant leader of technology in the world. I happen to believe that the most important warfighting technology is not a new airplane. The most important warfighting technology is not AI or anything on a computer. The most important warfighting technology is a well-trained and well-armed U.S. Marine, and we won’t forget it." Source: Vice President JD Vance, JD Vance, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Pete Hegseth

🇺🇸 VP VANCE: "MOST IMPORTANT WARFIGHTING TECH? A WELL-ARMED U.S. MARINE" "We’ve got boats, we’ve got airplanes, and we’ve got United States Marines. But let’s be honest, we all know the battlefield has changed in an incredible and profound way. We’ve got technology that, even when I was a little kid, would have been inconceivable, and now it’s driving the face of the modern battlefield. We’ve got cybersecurity. We’ve got satellites in space. We’ve got AI. We’ve got all this incredible technology. And of course, the U.S. is the most significant leader of technology in the world. I happen to believe that the most important warfighting technology is not a new airplane. The most important warfighting technology is not AI or anything on a computer. The most important warfighting technology is a well-trained and well-armed U.S. Marine, and we won’t forget it." Source: Vice President JD Vance, JD Vance, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Pete Hegseth

Mario Nawfal

70,947 views • 9 months ago

Outstanding point from Vice President JD Vance addressing those claiming ICE is showing up at someone’s place of residence and those inside insist they haven’t heard of the person they’re looking for.... “Let's say, for example, we have a criminal migrant who is a sex offender, and let's say that we've got to go and arrest that person who, Democrat or Republican, wants a sex offender living in their community, I would assume — I would hope that most people don't. But because they're in illegal alien, we don't know their last address. We may have known their address three years ago, but we don't know their address now.” “What we'd like to do is talk to local officials and say, you know what? According to the Medicaid rules, where was the last person, this person — or where was the last address this person was domiciled? Or according to a SNAP application, a food stamps application? Maybe that could give us insight to where this person is today or maybe they had some local court trouble. We could go to the local courthouse, or even the local jail, and try to find where this criminal sex offender is today. The local authorities have been told do not cooperate. So, these guys are trying to go out and enforce the law. They're trying to arrest sex offenders, but they're trying to do it in an environment where local officials have been told do not help them, do not provide intelligence about where these sex offenders might be. This is disgraceful, and there are a lot of things that all of us could do better to lower the temperature. But the number one thing that I learned today is that the best way to facilitate reasonable enforcement of the law, but also to lower the chaos in Minneapolis, would be for state and local officials to cooperate.”

Outstanding point from Vice President JD Vance addressing those claiming ICE is showing up at someone’s place of residence and those inside insist they haven’t heard of the person they’re looking for.... “Let's say, for example, we have a criminal migrant who is a sex offender, and let's say that we've got to go and arrest that person who, Democrat or Republican, wants a sex offender living in their community, I would assume — I would hope that most people don't. But because they're in illegal alien, we don't know their last address. We may have known their address three years ago, but we don't know their address now.” “What we'd like to do is talk to local officials and say, you know what? According to the Medicaid rules, where was the last person, this person — or where was the last address this person was domiciled? Or according to a SNAP application, a food stamps application? Maybe that could give us insight to where this person is today or maybe they had some local court trouble. We could go to the local courthouse, or even the local jail, and try to find where this criminal sex offender is today. The local authorities have been told do not cooperate. So, these guys are trying to go out and enforce the law. They're trying to arrest sex offenders, but they're trying to do it in an environment where local officials have been told do not help them, do not provide intelligence about where these sex offenders might be. This is disgraceful, and there are a lot of things that all of us could do better to lower the temperature. But the number one thing that I learned today is that the best way to facilitate reasonable enforcement of the law, but also to lower the chaos in Minneapolis, would be for state and local officials to cooperate.”

Curtis Houck

30,929 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. TRADE AMBASSADOR: CHINA GOT OUR RARE EARTH TECH, THAT WAS A MISTAKE U.S. Trade Ambassador Jamieson Greer: “This is technology with respect to the rare earth. It's technology that the U.S. invented and pioneered 60 years ago. And China was able to have some of that transfer of technology, which was a mistake, turns out. And so it's completely normal for us, in the face of Chinese export controls, to diversify and develop other sources. And again, we get these word salads coming out of Beijing trying to justify what they've done. No one's fooled.” Source: Laura Ingraham

🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. TRADE AMBASSADOR: CHINA GOT OUR RARE EARTH TECH, THAT WAS A MISTAKE U.S. Trade Ambassador Jamieson Greer: “This is technology with respect to the rare earth. It's technology that the U.S. invented and pioneered 60 years ago. And China was able to have some of that transfer of technology, which was a mistake, turns out. And so it's completely normal for us, in the face of Chinese export controls, to diversify and develop other sources. And again, we get these word salads coming out of Beijing trying to justify what they've done. No one's fooled.” Source: Laura Ingraham

Mario Nawfal

135,305 views • 10 months ago

I have seen this video in many WhatsApp groups, and many of you sent it to me too. The solution to this problem is for Mnangagwa’s Government to license Starlink and open up the market. But will that happen? Old technology is expensive to run, new technology makes things cheaper. Without Starlink the price of data will remain ridiculously high because of less competition and of course the economy is in a free fall too.

I have seen this video in many WhatsApp groups, and many of you sent it to me too. The solution to this problem is for Mnangagwa’s Government to license Starlink and open up the market. But will that happen? Old technology is expensive to run, new technology makes things cheaper. Without Starlink the price of data will remain ridiculously high because of less competition and of course the economy is in a free fall too.

Hopewell Chin’ono

121,121 views • 2 years ago

I thought for sure this had to be fake, but I looked into it and it’s 100% verified “In Maine, the taxpayers are going to have to reimburse any immigrants caught committing fraud” “Democrat governor, Janet Mills, she is trying to pass a law that says that if you catch somebody committing fraud, like if you're a private citizen and you expose somebody committing fraud, and in turn the federal government defunds that company 'cause they were caught committing fraud, that the taxpayers of Maine will have to reimburse that person for any money they lost from the federal government. They are saying that if you come to Maine and you commit fraud, that even if that fraud is proven, if as a result you lose taxpayer funding from the federal government, that the taxpayers of Maine will still give you the money even if you are committing fraud.” This is from a provision buried in Governor Janet Mills’ proposed state budget for 2026–2027 In this provision is language that would require Maine taxpayers to reimburse via state funds any businesses, nonprofits, or providers that lose federal funding due to the Trump administration’s crackdown on fraud. Particularly in programs like Medicaid/MaineCare Critics call this “reimbursing fraudsters” or shielding entities committing fraud with public money, especially since the main involved nonprofits focus on immigrant services Democrats are a money laundering criminal organization

I thought for sure this had to be fake, but I looked into it and it’s 100% verified “In Maine, the taxpayers are going to have to reimburse any immigrants caught committing fraud” “Democrat governor, Janet Mills, she is trying to pass a law that says that if you catch somebody committing fraud, like if you're a private citizen and you expose somebody committing fraud, and in turn the federal government defunds that company 'cause they were caught committing fraud, that the taxpayers of Maine will have to reimburse that person for any money they lost from the federal government. They are saying that if you come to Maine and you commit fraud, that even if that fraud is proven, if as a result you lose taxpayer funding from the federal government, that the taxpayers of Maine will still give you the money even if you are committing fraud.” This is from a provision buried in Governor Janet Mills’ proposed state budget for 2026–2027 In this provision is language that would require Maine taxpayers to reimburse via state funds any businesses, nonprofits, or providers that lose federal funding due to the Trump administration’s crackdown on fraud. Particularly in programs like Medicaid/MaineCare Critics call this “reimbursing fraudsters” or shielding entities committing fraud with public money, especially since the main involved nonprofits focus on immigrant services Democrats are a money laundering criminal organization

Wall Street Apes

421,305 views • 4 months ago