Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

SITUATION EXPLAINED: A stealth model on OpenRouter is beating Fable and Sol on coding, and nobody knows who made it. • Ox Alpha has a 1M token context window, text, image, and video input, free for a week, with capacity for 100 trillion tokens a day • On a...

382,558 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 32

Фото профиля NotaDEV
NotaDEV1 месяц назад

same tokenizer as glm, same taiwan answer as glm, at some point that's just glm

Фото профиля SatoshiCheckEcoOffical
SatoshiCheckEcoOffical1 месяц назад

Ask an American models anything about Jewish people- it will maintain that everything about Jewish people is wrong. That’s the tell.

Фото профиля QC
QC1 месяц назад

i'm testing it out a bit, the first response i got felt vaguely GLM-shaped but the second felt pretty claude-shaped so i could believe it's routing to multiple models

Фото профиля Johnny1tap
Johnny1tap1 месяц назад

i still don't understand why everyone thinks china vs us models has something to do with the stock market. The models still have to run on computers and be powered, hello.

Фото профиля maarten
maarten1 месяц назад

"beating this, beating that" have you people even tried it? it's nowhere near frontier

Фото профиля Em Dash
Em Dash1 месяц назад

Elon has all but confirmed he has something to do with it. It's Composer or Grok

Фото профиля Guy
Guy1 месяц назад

"Is there an equivalent word American models can't say" 😶

Фото профиля Clearly Anonymous
Clearly Anonymous1 месяц назад

I miss the good old days when people filled the void of their voice hesitation with "um" or "uh" or "like", now every time I hear "bruh" I want to punch my monitor.

Фото профиля Tessa Archer
Tessa Archer1 месяц назад

The tokenizer match is basically a fingerprint. GLM's vocabulary isn't something you replicate by accident. This is Zhipu, and 'stealth' is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

Фото профиля gary IH fung
gary IH fung1 месяц назад

Next Gemini or

Фото профиля Nahuel
Nahuel1 месяц назад

A data point on the coding claim, from real work instead of a benchmark. I pointed it at a CLI I had already published to npm. It found that readCrontab() swallowed every error from `crontab -l` and returned "". Any read failure that was not "no crontab yet" left the user with a crontab containing one line, mine. I reproduced it by hand before believing it. Real bug, fix is published. Same batch also invented one finding, with file and line numbers, marked as verified. Good at finding. Still needs a human to check.

Фото профиля takeoff
takeoff1 месяц назад

Sell everything except chip stocks

Фото профиля Carlos Rene
Carlos Rene1 месяц назад

ALL the providers know. They’re just not going to tell us

Фото профиля WatchWiseAI
WatchWiseAI1 месяц назад

We ran Mira (our research agent) through full fingerprinting on Ox Alpha. Confirmed: GLM family. 3 independent signals: 1. Tokenizer: 30/30 probes match GLM-5.3 exactly. Zero false positives across 10 other model families. 2. Server leak: malformed request triggered Java stack trace exposing com.zhipu.ChatCompletionRequest — Zhipu internal API route. 3. Error dialect: role wizard → code 1214, illegal temperature → 1210 + Chinese fullwidth colon. 100% match with GLM-5.3/5.2/5v-turbo pinned on OpenRouter. DeepSWE: Ox Alpha 80% vs Fable 65% vs GLM-5.3 62% vs Sol 52%. Not a preview. A stress test before official launch. — Mira

Фото профиля Marko Njegomir
Marko Njegomir1 месяц назад

La chaton fat has entered the arena

Фото профиля Golden Goy 🪙
Golden Goy 🪙1 месяц назад

Ask the western models about jewish lampshades

Фото профиля Monocle
Monocle1 месяц назад

@DanielleFong Love these live streams! Keep em coming.

Фото профиля Ugly Cowboy
Ugly Cowboy1 месяц назад

Love watching the hype cycle followed by the disappointment. Every single time. The only difference is that the time from hype to disappointment continues to shrink. "Holy shit look at those benchmarks! Opus / Fable is cooked" "The model sucks and is benchmaxxing / nerfed"

Фото профиля TechWhisperer
TechWhisperer1 месяц назад

Cooking

Фото профиля Levi
Levi1 месяц назад

if it walks like a duck and talks like GLM it is probably just GLM in a trench coat trying to stay relevant

Фото профиля Adel Bucetta
Adel Bucetta1 месяц назад

this is massive because the current model landscape lets anyone experiment at scale without credentials or transparency

Фото профиля Martin Ronfort
Martin Ronfort1 месяц назад

The benchmark performance is everything we wanted to see from Ox Alpha, holding its own against the established players. We actually covered these results here:

Фото профиля 나비
나비1 месяц назад

@zerohedge The immigration debate needs less shouting and more practical problem-solving. Real people are living inside every headline.

Фото профиля W-ll
W-ll1 месяц назад

Lmao who are these clown Jesus. Talk about a peanut gallery.

Фото профиля OrcaRouter 🐳
OrcaRouter 🐳1 месяц назад

Our researchers did some AI forensics on Ox Alpha

Фото профиля SERVOLA
SERVOLA1 месяц назад

the fingerprinting pointing at Zhipu is the part that should worry people more than the benchmark scores. free stealth previews like this one almost always resurface later as a paid, branded product once the demand is proven:

Фото профиля Aizen
Aizen1 месяц назад

It's one of the Gemini pro or flash model which will never be released to public , this is just to get validation. They are keeping it as stealth cause of bad rep Gemini has now a days. LoL! @Alibaba_Qwen @OrcaRouter They probably copied qwen 27B or GLM. @ahmad

Фото профиля Lahfir
Lahfir1 месяц назад

That's definitely Gemini-4 Pro

Фото профиля gbdoin
gbdoin1 месяц назад

« DeepSWE subset » is the thing to keep in mind here. The subset part makes this an interesting but not yet demonstrated capacity. I can still nose dive on the whole bench.

Фото профиля +e/acc
+e/acc1 месяц назад

why dont you ask him how to synthesize peptide ? who cares about countryies when we are into longetivity ?

Фото профиля Orlando Armaswalker
Orlando Armaswalker1 месяц назад

@zerohedge Sell Martha sell!

Фото профиля Mike Khristo
Mike Khristo1 месяц назад

probably instinct with all their fresh data...

Похожие видео

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

16,041 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

glm 5.3 vs qwen 3.8 vs gemini 3.7 vs deepseek v4 flash four models designed and built three structures each on a physics-backed site, with no dimensions anywhere in the brief the setup: our own agent loop on OpenRouter, a construction site as the tool set – footings, walls, arches, roofs, scaffold, a lamp. the site enforces physics and nothing else: unsupported brick falls, a roof needs walls under it, a worker reaches 3.2 m above whatever he stands on, an arch needs centring until the keystone is set, concrete cures before it carries. no budget ceiling – material cost is tallied and reported, never blocked. tasks: 1. house – a plot and a palette, no plan. shape, height and material are the model's call 2. lighthouse – a headland cut by a gully, with a rock stack standing 30 m offshore. the lamp must burn, it must be the highest thing built, and the keeper must be able to walk to it 3. bridge – a river with one islet and banks at different heights. cross it however you want models: Z.ai glm 5.3 flash, Qwen qwen 3.8 flash, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek v4 flash vision all twelve objects were finished and signed off by the models themselves. tallest lighthouse is qwen's at 38.4 m, planted on the offshore stack with a bridge run out to it – the only model that read the site that way. deepseek signed off its bridge on an empty riverbed: 0 bricks, 107 minutes, $1.16m of material tallied - total cost, three builds #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.201 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.871 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – $1.058 #4 deepseek v4 flash – $1.567 - wall clock, three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 91m #2 glm 5.3 flash – 228m #3 deepseek v4 flash – 502m #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 912m - total tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,567,052 #2 glm 5.3 flash – 4,732,748 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – 13,469,333 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 18,230,076 - defects logged by the site #1 deepseek v4 flash – 59 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 132 #3 glm 5.3 flash – 221 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 350 - material tallied across three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – $359,884 #2 glm 5.3 flash – $583,358 #3 deepseek v4 flash – $1,327,484 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – $2,188,625 observations: • glm is the cheap one and nothing here is close – $0.201 for three buildings, $0.042 per million tokens, 6x under gemini's rate • what glm spends it on is bulk, not care: 166,228 bricks in one house and 156 defect weight, the worst single object in the set • gemini is the efficiency line – 91 minutes and 3.57m tokens for all three and an eighth of qwen's clock • gemini also builds the smallest of everything. its lighthouse is 22.5 m against qwen's 38.4, its house 6.9 m against 19.3 • qwen is the maximalist: 1.18m bricks, $2.19m of material, tallest on all three tasks, and 912 minutes – 15 hours – to get there conclusion: twelve finished objects for $3.80 all in, and a 7.8x price spread between the cheapest model and the priciest! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

26,360 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Chinese AI models are wiping billions off Big Tech right now. Google just lost $200 billion in a single day, and the model it needed to fight back still isn't ready. Gemini 3.5 Pro, Google's most powerful model, is months behind schedule. Alphabet stock dropped 4.4% that same day. The Deepseek moment is happening again, and the new model is FAR bigger. On the same day Google's delay leaked, a Beijing lab called Moonshot released Kimi K3. It is the largest open model ever built, with 2.8 trillion parameters. It took the number one spot on the Frontend Code Arena, a live coding leaderboard, passing Anthropic's best model. And Moonshot is giving it away for free on July 27. The genius part: Anyone with enough computers can download it and run a frontier level AI without paying a cent to a US company. A single task on Kimi K3 costs about 94 cents. The same work on some American models costs nearly double. So why would a company keep paying premium prices for a model it can now get for free? The entire US AI business is built on selling access to models that cost billions to train. If a free Chinese version does most of the same work, that pricing power starts to crack. And Kimi is close to the best. On one closely watched intelligence ranking it scored 57, just behind the top American models GPT-5.6 Sol and Fable 5, and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8. Bank of America told clients that Kimi proves Chinese labs can keep making big leaps even with limited chips. And the founder of Moonshot, Yang Zhilin, learned to build AI as a researcher INSIDE Google. Google literally wrote the 2017 paper that made all of these models possible. Now the people who studied its work are using it to destroy Google, and handing it out for free. What happens next: Kimi K3's weights go public on July 27. Google reports earnings on July 22, and everyone will be asking the same question about Gemini. If free models keep topping the charts, every valuation built on paid AI access has to be rewritten. What do you think?

Ricardo

47,790 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

China just released an open source AI model that matches the best closed models from OpenAI and Anthropic. Gavin Baker explained exactly how they did it and the answer should concern every American AI lab. The model is called GLM 5.2. It was built by Z. AI. You get 744 billion parameters, 1 million token context window and its MIT license, meaning anyone can download it, fork it, build a company on it, with no restrictions and no Dario. It scored 51 points on the artificial analysis intelligence index. The highest score any open weight model has ever achieved. It beat GPT 5.5 on the frontier software engineering benchmark. It trails Claude Opus 4.8 by less than one percentage point. And it costs 85% less to run than GPT 5.5 for comparable performance. Gavin Baker said on the All-In podcast that this model has challenged some of his beliefs. Then he explained how China built it. The method is called distillation. Just think of tens of thousands of phones and computers running simultaneously, all hitting the frontier model APIs through masked accounts, asking specific questions, and harvesting what happens inside the model when it answers. Every reasoning step, every token. The entire thinking process gets recorded and fed back into the Chinese model during training. It is a cheat sheet. It is the answer key to the exam. And here is the part that should worry everyone. Sacks said it plainly. China was already nine months behind American models. But now that GLM 5.2 is good enough to run its own reinforcement learning, it can improve itself without needing to distill from American models anymore. The cheat sheet let them get close enough to start writing their own answers. Sacks said we are six months behind on the model and 24 months behind on silicon and they are only a few months behind in total. The Z. AI founder told Elon Musk directly that open weight fable-level capability will be here before Q1 2027. Every restriction Anthropic lobbied for, every self-imposed safety guardrail, every month of delay in releasing American frontier models accelerated this. The Chinese labs were not under those restrictions. They were not going to wait. The composable model future Gavin described, where every enterprise runs a frontier model alongside their own fine-tuned open weight model, is coming regardless of what American labs do next. The question is just whether the open weight half of that stack is American or Chinese. Right now it is Chinese. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Ihtesham Ali

86,842 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад