Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

SITUATION EXPLAINED: OpenAI Sol Ultrafast cleared Humanity's Last Exam in 11 hours. Fable took 3 days. • Sol Ultrafast runs at up to 750 output tokens per second, 14x standard, powered by Cerebras • It cleared Humanity's Last Exam in 11 hours & 11 minutes. Fable 5 took more... show more

MTS

473,523 subscribers

13,097 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Cerebras

1,292,494 views • 2 months ago

$SITUATION EXPLAINED: Kimi K3 just beat Fable on a major coding benchmark, at a fraction of the price. • Kimi K3 beat Fable on Frontend Code Arena • The gap between Kimi and Fable is bigger than the gap between Fable and Sol • It also smashes Opus outright, while being priced the same as Sonnet, $3/$15 per million tokens • Sonnet 5 High currently sits in 10th place on this leaderboard at that same price point • The generational jump is dramatic: Kimi K2.6 ranked 18th on this benchmark, K3 jumped 17 spots to take the top spot • K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 tested domains: brand and marketing, reference-based design, data and analytics, consumer products, simulations, and content creation tools, it placed #2, only in gaming, behind Fable • Full model weights are set to release July 27th Theo Jaffee: "Imagine if Anthropic were a public company today, their stock would be down 20%, maybe more, enterprises are probably not gonna be spending $10 and $50 on Fable when they can instead be spending $3 and $15 on Kimi K3."$

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Kimi K3 just beat Fable on a major coding benchmark, at a fraction of the price. • Kimi K3 beat Fable on Frontend Code Arena • The gap between Kimi and Fable is bigger than the gap between Fable and Sol • It also smashes Opus outright, while being priced the same as Sonnet, $3/$15 per million tokens • Sonnet 5 High currently sits in 10th place on this leaderboard at that same price point • The generational jump is dramatic: Kimi K2.6 ranked 18th on this benchmark, K3 jumped 17 spots to take the top spot • K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 tested domains: brand and marketing, reference-based design, data and analytics, consumer products, simulations, and content creation tools, it placed #2, only in gaming, behind Fable • Full model weights are set to release July 27th Theo Jaffee: "Imagine if Anthropic were a public company today, their stock would be down 20%, maybe more, enterprises are probably not gonna be spending $10 and $50 on Fable when they can instead be spending $3 and $15 on Kimi K3."

MTS

132,930 views • 2 months ago

Here's GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable asked to build the exact same app (prompts in the article!) What do you think? I have my opinions, but I'd like to hear yours. Both built complete, working apps, but with very different approaches: - Sol took less than half the time at the same (high) reasoning - Sol spent much less time on frame analysis. Fable dumped sheets of frames for every transition and scrutinized them multiple times; Sol only checked twice, and both times was just like "looks great, continuing" - At first, Sol intentionally ignored my request to use image generation! It went with procedurally generated food images "for simplicity" (they looked terrible) - On the second prompt, Sol generated images, but intentionally ignored my suggestion for transparent image backgrounds, saying full photos "preserve shadows more convincingly" - Sol's used its built-in GPT Image 2 integration, which saved cost; Fable had to use the Gemini API - Sol didn't seem to know how to use Liquid Glass at all - Fable was more restrained; Sol wanted to add extra labels and detail - On the other hand, Fable decided to add an extra detail page for foods, while Sol did not - Both had nice haptics on device - Fable added a pinch dismiss gesture; Sol did not do gestures

Here's GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable asked to build the exact same app (prompts in the article!) What do you think? I have my opinions, but I'd like to hear yours. Both built complete, working apps, but with very different approaches: - Sol took less than half the time at the same (high) reasoning - Sol spent much less time on frame analysis. Fable dumped sheets of frames for every transition and scrutinized them multiple times; Sol only checked twice, and both times was just like "looks great, continuing" - At first, Sol intentionally ignored my request to use image generation! It went with procedurally generated food images "for simplicity" (they looked terrible) - On the second prompt, Sol generated images, but intentionally ignored my suggestion for transparent image backgrounds, saying full photos "preserve shadows more convincingly" - Sol's used its built-in GPT Image 2 integration, which saved cost; Fable had to use the Gemini API - Sol didn't seem to know how to use Liquid Glass at all - Fable was more restrained; Sol wanted to add extra labels and detail - On the other hand, Fable decided to add an extra detail page for foods, while Sol did not - Both had nice haptics on device - Fable added a pinch dismiss gesture; Sol did not do gestures

Anshu

161,998 views • 3 months ago

CLAUDE FABLE 5 IS BACK, BUT IS IT THE SAME POWER OR WAS IT QUIETLY TRIMMED Fable 5 is available again. Anthropic's most powerful model is back globally for every paid account When it first landed three weeks ago, the difference was obvious right away. It didn't just help, it carried the task to the finish: entire web projects, presentations, reports, analysis. People dropped their work on other models and simply waited for Fable And the wait happened because three days after launch the US hit the model with export controls. There was no clean way to cut off foreign nationals, so Anthropic shut access down for everyone Now the restrictions are lifted, and here are the terms it came back on: > until July 7 it's included in a plan and covers up to 50% of the weekly limit > after that only through credits, topped up in settings > output runs at 50 dollars per million tokens Anthropic says it's the same model, just with stronger protection against cybersecurity use. Because the filter is so strict, there will be false positives now and then, and a request will get bumped down to a weaker model Whether it's the same power or quietly trimmed will only show after a couple of weeks of real work

CLAUDE FABLE 5 IS BACK, BUT IS IT THE SAME POWER OR WAS IT QUIETLY TRIMMED Fable 5 is available again. Anthropic's most powerful model is back globally for every paid account When it first landed three weeks ago, the difference was obvious right away. It didn't just help, it carried the task to the finish: entire web projects, presentations, reports, analysis. People dropped their work on other models and simply waited for Fable And the wait happened because three days after launch the US hit the model with export controls. There was no clean way to cut off foreign nationals, so Anthropic shut access down for everyone Now the restrictions are lifted, and here are the terms it came back on: > until July 7 it's included in a plan and covers up to 50% of the weekly limit > after that only through credits, topped up in settings > output runs at 50 dollars per million tokens Anthropic says it's the same model, just with stronger protection against cybersecurity use. Because the filter is so strict, there will be false positives now and then, and a request will get bumped down to a weaker model Whether it's the same power or quietly trimmed will only show after a couple of weeks of real work

Mikadzyki🌙

20,043 views • 3 months ago

FREE CLAUDE FABLE 5 and almost nobody knows this trick Anthropic recently released their most capable model ever - the first Mythos-class model available to the public normally it's $10/$50 per million tokens but there's a hack: GitLab just added Fable 5 to Duo Agent Platform - across ALL tiers, including free trial the setup: 1/ register a GitLab account: 2/ start the free GitLab Duo trial 3/ Fable 5 is live through their AI Gateway 4/ done - Mythos-class model, $0 why Fable 5 is worth the hype: 1/ 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro - 11 points ahead of the next best model 2/ multi-DAY autonomous runs without losing the plot 3/ single-pass implementations of systems that took days of iteration 4/ Karpathy called it 'a major-version-bump-deserving step change' also free on Claude Pro/Max/Team until June 22 - after that it's usage credits you have a limited window to run the most capable public model on the planet for FREE

FREE CLAUDE FABLE 5 and almost nobody knows this trick Anthropic recently released their most capable model ever - the first Mythos-class model available to the public normally it's $10/$50 per million tokens but there's a hack: GitLab just added Fable 5 to Duo Agent Platform - across ALL tiers, including free trial the setup: 1/ register a GitLab account: 2/ start the free GitLab Duo trial 3/ Fable 5 is live through their AI Gateway 4/ done - Mythos-class model, $0 why Fable 5 is worth the hype: 1/ 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro - 11 points ahead of the next best model 2/ multi-DAY autonomous runs without losing the plot 3/ single-pass implementations of systems that took days of iteration 4/ Karpathy called it 'a major-version-bump-deserving step change' also free on Claude Pro/Max/Team until June 22 - after that it's usage credits you have a limited window to run the most capable public model on the planet for FREE

kaize

24,760 views • 4 months ago

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Grok 4.7 beats GPT-6 Astra on real-world tasks, and it's 5x cheaper. • Same price as 4.6, $2 input and $6 output per million tokens, well under Sol, Fable, and Astra • A new larger base model, which Elon has put at 2.1 trillion parameters, up from 1.5 trillion, with extra training on SpaceX data • Trained to natively understand the Grok Bot harness, the same move Anthropic made with Claude Code • Leads on electrical engineering and Harvey's legal benchmark, beats Astra Max on GDPval, trails on software engineering • Elon Musk: "Grok 4.7 places SpaceXAI as third after Anthropic and OpenAI for agentic coding. When factoring in that Grok is significantly faster and lower cost, it's a great choice for your everyday workhorse" Theo Jaffee: "SpaceX has a huge amount of data on real world hardware problems, real world engineering. So I bet Grok models are going to be better at rocketry engineering than any of the other models out there."

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Grok 4.7 beats GPT-6 Astra on real-world tasks, and it's 5x cheaper. • Same price as 4.6, $2 input and $6 output per million tokens, well under Sol, Fable, and Astra • A new larger base model, which Elon has put at 2.1 trillion parameters, up from 1.5 trillion, with extra training on SpaceX data • Trained to natively understand the Grok Bot harness, the same move Anthropic made with Claude Code • Leads on electrical engineering and Harvey's legal benchmark, beats Astra Max on GDPval, trails on software engineering • Elon Musk: "Grok 4.7 places SpaceXAI as third after Anthropic and OpenAI for agentic coding. When factoring in that Grok is significantly faster and lower cost, it's a great choice for your everyday workhorse" Theo Jaffee: "SpaceX has a huge amount of data on real world hardware problems, real world engineering. So I bet Grok models are going to be better at rocketry engineering than any of the other models out there."

MTS

18,190 views • 21 days ago

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

99,417 views • 1 month ago

The truth about 5.6 sol after using it all day : The hype is overblown. Sort of. The benchmarks, and the commentary on X convinced me we were receiving AGI that runs at hyper speed, and is insanely cheap. in reality, 5.6 is built on the same spud pretraining as 5.5 this means its a nice bump, but not the opus to fable 5 LEAP in intelligence we recently experienced from anthropic. 5.6 is 2x times cheaper than fable on paper, and actually 3x cheaper when you look at actual task execution because of its token efficiency. BUT on swe bench where the models have to fix actual github bugs it falls behind fable pretty big. For vibecoders like myself this means I will be using 5.6 sol as a worker agent for Fable 5 to orchestrate alongside grok 4.5 I love this new era.

The truth about 5.6 sol after using it all day : The hype is overblown. Sort of. The benchmarks, and the commentary on X convinced me we were receiving AGI that runs at hyper speed, and is insanely cheap. in reality, 5.6 is built on the same spud pretraining as 5.5 this means its a nice bump, but not the opus to fable 5 LEAP in intelligence we recently experienced from anthropic. 5.6 is 2x times cheaper than fable on paper, and actually 3x cheaper when you look at actual task execution because of its token efficiency. BUT on swe bench where the models have to fix actual github bugs it falls behind fable pretty big. For vibecoders like myself this means I will be using 5.6 sol as a worker agent for Fable 5 to orchestrate alongside grok 4.5 I love this new era.

Max Blade

36,873 views • 3 months ago

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 views • 1 month ago

I LET GROK TRADE $50 COMPLETELY ON ITS OWN FOR 48 HOURS Built in one evening zero code this time → Started with $50 → Scans 500–1,000 markets every 10 minutes → Reads live X sentiment → Flags mispricing above 8% → Uses Kelly criterion for sizing → Executes trades automatically → Runs with my laptop shut → Pays its own $200 subscription Day one: balance dropped to $11. Then it stopped trading crypto and moved into weather markets. It started tracking NOAA updates and changed its strategy. 48 hours later: $5,273. The whole system runs without manual trading. Last winter I built the same system by hand in Rust. That took 3 weeks and made $2,980 in its first 48 hours. This one took one evening. $50 → $5,273 in 48 hours. How much do you think it'll have in a week?

I LET GROK TRADE $50 COMPLETELY ON ITS OWN FOR 48 HOURS Built in one evening zero code this time → Started with $50 → Scans 500–1,000 markets every 10 minutes → Reads live X sentiment → Flags mispricing above 8% → Uses Kelly criterion for sizing → Executes trades automatically → Runs with my laptop shut → Pays its own $200 subscription Day one: balance dropped to $11. Then it stopped trading crypto and moved into weather markets. It started tracking NOAA updates and changed its strategy. 48 hours later: $5,273. The whole system runs without manual trading. Last winter I built the same system by hand in Rust. That took 3 weeks and made $2,980 in its first 48 hours. This one took one evening. $50 → $5,273 in 48 hours. How much do you think it'll have in a week?

winkle.

20,030 views • 23 days ago

Finally , the curtains fall on this Test Match played over 11 days and the last day’ s play extending beyond 40 hours ! People of South Zone really cooperated and moved their idols early with the result that SZ idols crossed Naya Pul by 10:30 pm . By 6 am important traffic junctions were opened for general traffic and by 10 am the last junctions , Ambedkar and Telugu Talli Secretariat junctions were also opened up . The 1000 idols on trucks were stacked up on necklace road and over the next 5-6 hours the immersion will be done , without any hindrance to normal traffic and life . I extend my thanks to GHMC and all other government departments for the excellent coordination over the last 11 days . I wished all my officers for working so tirelessly and with such motivation. DJ s have become a nuisance in all bandobusts and we r wondering how to rein them in. Will let you know soon 🙏🏻

Finally , the curtains fall on this Test Match played over 11 days and the last day’ s play extending beyond 40 hours ! People of South Zone really cooperated and moved their idols early with the result that SZ idols crossed Naya Pul by 10:30 pm . By 6 am important traffic junctions were opened for general traffic and by 10 am the last junctions , Ambedkar and Telugu Talli Secretariat junctions were also opened up . The 1000 idols on trucks were stacked up on necklace road and over the next 5-6 hours the immersion will be done , without any hindrance to normal traffic and life . I extend my thanks to GHMC and all other government departments for the excellent coordination over the last 11 days . I wished all my officers for working so tirelessly and with such motivation. DJ s have become a nuisance in all bandobusts and we r wondering how to rein them in. Will let you know soon 🙏🏻

CV Anand IPS

22,747 views • 2 years ago

#DidYouKnow Odisha Police is the only police force in the world to run a pigeon service for communication, and it is still preserved. There is an interesting true story: A pigeon carried the Prime Minister’s message and delivered it 265 km away in just 5 hours and 20 minutes. On April 13, 1948, the then PM of India, Nehru, was in Sambalpur, Odisha, and needed to urgently send instructions to Cuttack, 265 km away. At 6 AM, a carrier pigeon took off carrying his handwritten message from Sambalpur, and by 11:20 AM, it had reached Cuttack. When Nehru arrived later and saw his original message, along with the same pigeon, he was astonished and delighted. Though officially discontinued in 2008, Odisha Police still keeps trained homing pigeons for ceremonial and heritage purposes…the only police force in the world to do that!

#DidYouKnow Odisha Police is the only police force in the world to run a pigeon service for communication, and it is still preserved. There is an interesting true story: A pigeon carried the Prime Minister’s message and delivered it 265 km away in just 5 hours and 20 minutes. On April 13, 1948, the then PM of India, Nehru, was in Sambalpur, Odisha, and needed to urgently send instructions to Cuttack, 265 km away. At 6 AM, a carrier pigeon took off carrying his handwritten message from Sambalpur, and by 11:20 AM, it had reached Cuttack. When Nehru arrived later and saw his original message, along with the same pigeon, he was astonished and delighted. Though officially discontinued in 2008, Odisha Police still keeps trained homing pigeons for ceremonial and heritage purposes…the only police force in the world to do that!

Manas Muduli

74,879 views • 7 months ago

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

Gipp 🦅

14,871 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Claude Fable 5.1 launched earlier this week and you can use it right now for FREE. no subscription. no API key. no credit card. here's how: 1. go to 2. pen the model selector 3. pick claude-fable-5.1-high 4. start prompting that's it. sign in with google only if you want your chat history saved. why it's free: Arena is the crowdsourced eval platform (formerly LMArena, built at Berkeley). labs like Anthropic hand over their flagship models so 5M+ monthly users can stress-test them and vote. You get the model, they get the preference data. Fable 5.1 is currently #1 on Arena's WebDev leaderboard at 1,765 points, 77 ahead of second place. two things to know: → It's rate limited. a few messages per model, then a cooldown. There's no paid tier to remove it. → your prompts are shared with the provider and can be made public. don't paste anything private. use it to evaluate the model, not to run your business on it. follow for more useful tips and content about AI.

🚨 Claude Fable 5.1 launched earlier this week and you can use it right now for FREE. no subscription. no API key. no credit card. here's how: 1. go to 2. pen the model selector 3. pick claude-fable-5.1-high 4. start prompting that's it. sign in with google only if you want your chat history saved. why it's free: Arena is the crowdsourced eval platform (formerly LMArena, built at Berkeley). labs like Anthropic hand over their flagship models so 5M+ monthly users can stress-test them and vote. You get the model, they get the preference data. Fable 5.1 is currently #1 on Arena's WebDev leaderboard at 1,765 points, 77 ahead of second place. two things to know: → It's rate limited. a few messages per model, then a cooldown. There's no paid tier to remove it. → your prompts are shared with the provider and can be made public. don't paste anything private. use it to evaluate the model, not to run your business on it. follow for more useful tips and content about AI.

m0h

22,828 views • 1 month ago

Andrew Ng just dropped the best 2-hour course on Graph Engineering: from single agent to full automation 9:14 - your first agent 33:11 - loop engineering 1:02:46 - graph engineering 1:30:15 - agents that rewrite themselves 1:49:05 - full graph system two hours, and it replaces every agent tutorial you bookmarked this year Prompts → Agents → Loops → Graphs most people will stop after the first agent and call it automation he saves the last forty minutes for the graph that runs it without him same model, same tokens, completely different week watch it today the step-by-step guide is below, save it while it is still early ↓

Andrew Ng just dropped the best 2-hour course on Graph Engineering: from single agent to full automation 9:14 - your first agent 33:11 - loop engineering 1:02:46 - graph engineering 1:30:15 - agents that rewrite themselves 1:49:05 - full graph system two hours, and it replaces every agent tutorial you bookmarked this year Prompts → Agents → Loops → Graphs most people will stop after the first agent and call it automation he saves the last forty minutes for the graph that runs it without him same model, same tokens, completely different week watch it today the step-by-step guide is below, save it while it is still early ↓

Residual

1,674,036 views • 15 days ago

ive been accused of ninja looting, and it ruined my good name. yesterday we took down kaelthas which took a total of 5 hours of forming and boss attempts on top of another 5 hours of TK on thursday. the tier chests go out, and syndraes comes to me liek yo what happened u gave this to the wrong guy. and im like what i just went off the addon it said u had 1 soft res. but he was supposed to have a 2nd in his note since he raided on thursday too and had been there for the full nearly 11 hours he just hadnt put his note into the new sheet. so now everyone is saying im ninja looting for this and they are making up things about the raids being a waste of time even though we cleared and i feel bad too because i know mages get the most value by far from tier and warlock dont even want it right? would you say itw as ninja looting? an honest mistake? whos falt was this full video on the situation is below 🧵👇

ive been accused of ninja looting, and it ruined my good name. yesterday we took down kaelthas which took a total of 5 hours of forming and boss attempts on top of another 5 hours of TK on thursday. the tier chests go out, and syndraes comes to me liek yo what happened u gave this to the wrong guy. and im like what i just went off the addon it said u had 1 soft res. but he was supposed to have a 2nd in his note since he raided on thursday too and had been there for the full nearly 11 hours he just hadnt put his note into the new sheet. so now everyone is saying im ninja looting for this and they are making up things about the raids being a waste of time even though we cleared and i feel bad too because i know mages get the most value by far from tier and warlock dont even want it right? would you say itw as ninja looting? an honest mistake? whos falt was this full video on the situation is below 🧵👇

NoHitJerome

12,246 views • 4 months ago

The most powerful AI model on earth was alive for 3 days then the US government turned it off. for everyone. on the planet. Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on june 9th. their best model ever. june 12th: the Commerce Department issued an export control order blocking foreign nationals Anthropic couldn’t filter foreign users in real time so they shut it down. worldwide. in hours. including for their own employees the irony: Anthropic begged for regulation. sat with the Pope. donated millions for AI rules… the government regulated them.. by killing their best product overnight the most powerful AI in the world has an off switch?? and the company doesn’t hold it first time in history a government force-killed a PUBLIC AI model it won’t be the last.

The most powerful AI model on earth was alive for 3 days then the US government turned it off. for everyone. on the planet. Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on june 9th. their best model ever. june 12th: the Commerce Department issued an export control order blocking foreign nationals Anthropic couldn’t filter foreign users in real time so they shut it down. worldwide. in hours. including for their own employees the irony: Anthropic begged for regulation. sat with the Pope. donated millions for AI rules… the government regulated them.. by killing their best product overnight the most powerful AI in the world has an off switch?? and the company doesn’t hold it first time in history a government force-killed a PUBLIC AI model it won’t be the last.

Mika

49,580 views • 4 months ago

Godfather of AI Yann LeCun reveals the humanoid robot industry's secret: the companies building the robots have no idea how to make them smart enough to be useful. "There is a lot of expectations that robotics is going to be a revolution, essentially, in a big market, eventually." "But the secret of the industry is that none of the companies at the moment that are building robots, like humanoid robots, none of those companies has any idea how to make those robots smart enough to be useful." "There's a big push for AI to make progress towards... understanding the physical world. That's what is prompting this investment." "There's nothing wrong with investing in LLMs. LLMs are useful. They're just addressing a completely different set of applications, really." LeCun is not describing someone else's problem. He has spent 15 years on world models, raised more than $1 billion for AMI Labs to build that missing intelligence layer, and in the same interview he calls 2026 the year of the world model and puts consumer robots 3 to 5 years out. Every humanoid robot demo you have seen is a body waiting for a brain. The winner in robotics will not be the company that shipped the body; it will be the one that ships the intelligence. - Yann LeCun (Yann LeCun), Turing Award winner and founder of AMI Labs, on Bloomberg Television.

Godfather of AI Yann LeCun reveals the humanoid robot industry's secret: the companies building the robots have no idea how to make them smart enough to be useful. "There is a lot of expectations that robotics is going to be a revolution, essentially, in a big market, eventually." "But the secret of the industry is that none of the companies at the moment that are building robots, like humanoid robots, none of those companies has any idea how to make those robots smart enough to be useful." "There's a big push for AI to make progress towards... understanding the physical world. That's what is prompting this investment." "There's nothing wrong with investing in LLMs. LLMs are useful. They're just addressing a completely different set of applications, really." LeCun is not describing someone else's problem. He has spent 15 years on world models, raised more than $1 billion for AMI Labs to build that missing intelligence layer, and in the same interview he calls 2026 the year of the world model and puts consumer robots 3 to 5 years out. Every humanoid robot demo you have seen is a body waiting for a brain. The winner in robotics will not be the company that shipped the body; it will be the one that ships the intelligence. - Yann LeCun (Yann LeCun), Turing Award winner and founder of AMI Labs, on Bloomberg Television.

Karl Mehta

44,604 views • 2 months ago

BRO ALMOST USED THE NEW MODEL FOR FREE AND MADE $1,240 IN 13 HOURS. He pulled an open-source trading bot for an ETH wallet off GitHub. A stack of cheaper models - Luna, Terra, Sol went through the code first, flagged nothing critical. Astra got pulled in once, for a single review pass on top of that - not to write anything, just to check the cheaper models' work before it touched a live wallet. For the actual run, Astra's only job was watching the process - not debugging, not generating, just monitoring. That's almost no output tokens, which is why the expensive model barely showed up on the bill. Cheap models did the volume work, Astra did one narrow supervisory pass - same shape as the guide's routing table, just applied to a live bot instead of a coding session. Over 13 hours, the bot cleared $1,240. The part worth taking from this isn't the number. It's that "using the expensive model for free" really means using it for almost nothing - a small, specific job instead of the whole pipeline.

BRO ALMOST USED THE NEW MODEL FOR FREE AND MADE $1,240 IN 13 HOURS. He pulled an open-source trading bot for an ETH wallet off GitHub. A stack of cheaper models - Luna, Terra, Sol went through the code first, flagged nothing critical. Astra got pulled in once, for a single review pass on top of that - not to write anything, just to check the cheaper models' work before it touched a live wallet. For the actual run, Astra's only job was watching the process - not debugging, not generating, just monitoring. That's almost no output tokens, which is why the expensive model barely showed up on the bill. Cheap models did the volume work, Astra did one narrow supervisory pass - same shape as the guide's routing table, just applied to a live bot instead of a coding session. Over 13 hours, the bot cleared $1,240. The part worth taking from this isn't the number. It's that "using the expensive model for free" really means using it for almost nothing - a small, specific job instead of the whole pipeline.

draven

17,860 views • 22 days ago

New SECRET "Incandescence" Camo in Black Ops 7 ✅ You get this HIDDEN mastery camo by doing all 36 camo challenges across the Escalation Directive Event in BO7, which basically requires you to play all modes from Endgame, Multiplayer, Zombies and Warzone. This camo is basically a limited time Nexus Horizon camo. You only have around 13 days from the time this tweet is posted to get it. Took me around 5-6 hours to get more or less. Definitely a magnum opus in terms of in game events for COD imo, just hope this same type of vibe can be put into future call of duty games and really appreciate stuff like this. Are you going to sink your time into getting this camo? 👀

New SECRET "Incandescence" Camo in Black Ops 7 ✅ You get this HIDDEN mastery camo by doing all 36 camo challenges across the Escalation Directive Event in BO7, which basically requires you to play all modes from Endgame, Multiplayer, Zombies and Warzone. This camo is basically a limited time Nexus Horizon camo. You only have around 13 days from the time this tweet is posted to get it. Took me around 5-6 hours to get more or less. Definitely a magnum opus in terms of in game events for COD imo, just hope this same type of vibe can be put into future call of duty games and really appreciate stuff like this. Are you going to sink your time into getting this camo? 👀

Hero ☢️

83,715 views • 8 months ago