Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Slavoj Žižek doesn't answer your question — he dismantles it, rebuilds it, and hands you something stranger and more useful than what you started with. Philosopher, provocateur, and self-described pessimist, he's spent decades insisting on something most thinkers shy away from: that freedom isn't the absence of necessity —... show more

Curt Jaimungal

58,993 subscribers

30,582 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

One of John McAfee's final messages to the world: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."

One of John McAfee's final messages to the world: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."

Red Pill Dispenser

516,470 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

Kyle L

148,267 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

President Kagame on making deals with Tshisekedi : It is the most difficult thing. I have dealt with him. You agree on something and the moment he leaves the room, it's either forgotten, it's changed or he'll say: “No, we didn't say that.”

President Kagame on making deals with Tshisekedi : It is the most difficult thing. I have dealt with him. You agree on something and the moment he leaves the room, it's either forgotten, it's changed or he'll say: “No, we didn't say that.”

Mwene Rugwe 🇧🇮

135,750 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dustin

41,455 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

George Ellis is one of those guests who makes you rethink what you thought you understood. Co-author with Stephen Hawking of the singularity theorems, he's spent decades insisting on something most physicists won't touch: that reductionism is simply — patently — false. Physics doesn't decide outcomes. Context does. The thermostat sets the temperature. The algorithm tells the electrons what to do. The physics is the servant, not the master.

George Ellis is one of those guests who makes you rethink what you thought you understood. Co-author with Stephen Hawking of the singularity theorems, he's spent decades insisting on something most physicists won't touch: that reductionism is simply — patently — false. Physics doesn't decide outcomes. Context does. The thermostat sets the temperature. The algorithm tells the electrons what to do. The physics is the servant, not the master.

Curt Jaimungal

34,687 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Five minutes. That's less time than you've already spent scrolling right now. What if you spent them on the one thing that actually matters — seeing yourself the way God actually sees you? Your worth was never something you were supposed to earn. God settled that the moment He created you. Most of us have just never stopped to believe it. 40 Days to Look Again is 5 minutes a day to stop chasing something you never needed to chase in the first place. Click the link to pre-order your copy today:

Five minutes. That's less time than you've already spent scrolling right now. What if you spent them on the one thing that actually matters — seeing yourself the way God actually sees you? Your worth was never something you were supposed to earn. God settled that the moment He created you. Most of us have just never stopped to believe it. 40 Days to Look Again is 5 minutes a day to stop chasing something you never needed to chase in the first place. Click the link to pre-order your copy today:

Tim Tebow

86,682 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Joe Rogan is talking about what happens when the wall between your thoughts and the world disappears. Not whether it should. What happens when it does. Rogan: “One of the big technological breakthroughs that’s gonna change the way human beings interact with each other is the development of a universal language. And some sort of technologically assisted telepathy.” Everyone hears telepathy and thinks about connection. What Rogan is actually describing is the end of the gap. The gap is the half second between what you think and what you choose to say. That half second is where you decide who you are. Where you soften the cruel thing before it leaves your mouth. Where you swallow the sentence that would end a marriage. The gap is not a flaw in human communication. It is the birthplace of every version of yourself you’ve ever chosen to be. Rogan: “The Tower of Babel. We can’t communicate with each other.” Babel was never the curse. Babel was the architecture. Scattered tongues forced every human on earth to choose their words. And the act of choosing your words is the act of choosing yourself. When thought transfers raw, that choice changes. Not because someone finally sees you clearly. Because you can no longer decide which version of you they see. The self was never the thought. The self lives in the gap between the thought and the mouth. Remove the gap and the question is where the self goes next. Rogan watched two people communicate without saying a word. Rogan: “They’re not even talking.” The question was never whether we could move thought without language. The question is who you are without the half second you’ve always used to decide.

Joe Rogan is talking about what happens when the wall between your thoughts and the world disappears. Not whether it should. What happens when it does. Rogan: “One of the big technological breakthroughs that’s gonna change the way human beings interact with each other is the development of a universal language. And some sort of technologically assisted telepathy.” Everyone hears telepathy and thinks about connection. What Rogan is actually describing is the end of the gap. The gap is the half second between what you think and what you choose to say. That half second is where you decide who you are. Where you soften the cruel thing before it leaves your mouth. Where you swallow the sentence that would end a marriage. The gap is not a flaw in human communication. It is the birthplace of every version of yourself you’ve ever chosen to be. Rogan: “The Tower of Babel. We can’t communicate with each other.” Babel was never the curse. Babel was the architecture. Scattered tongues forced every human on earth to choose their words. And the act of choosing your words is the act of choosing yourself. When thought transfers raw, that choice changes. Not because someone finally sees you clearly. Because you can no longer decide which version of you they see. The self was never the thought. The self lives in the gap between the thought and the mouth. Remove the gap and the question is where the self goes next. Rogan watched two people communicate without saying a word. Rogan: “They’re not even talking.” The question was never whether we could move thought without language. The question is who you are without the half second you’ve always used to decide.

Dustin

14,036 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This is the moment Elon said what every taxpayer feels: "You get taxed on what you earn, you get taxed on what you buy, and you get taxed on what you own." "Taxes, taxes, taxes." "And then what does it get spent on? A bunch of the stuff it gets spent on, you don't even agree with." "That's why we need to reduce the size of the government... and let the people keep more of their hard earned money." Do you agree with him?

This is the moment Elon said what every taxpayer feels: "You get taxed on what you earn, you get taxed on what you buy, and you get taxed on what you own." "Taxes, taxes, taxes." "And then what does it get spent on? A bunch of the stuff it gets spent on, you don't even agree with." "That's why we need to reduce the size of the government... and let the people keep more of their hard earned money." Do you agree with him?

Defiant Ghost

101,361 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Philosopher Slavoj Žižek on why searching for your "true self" is a mistake: Žižek argues that the pursuit of a true inner self is ultimately misguided. Deep introspection, he suggests, often reveals only disturbing or chaotic fantasies. "Don't look for your inner self. You'll only find deep shit." Instead of searching for an authentic core, Žižek believes genuine personal growth comes from embracing an external mask, a chosen social role. "The only way to overcome yourself is to identify with your mask." To illustrate this, he references the 1960 Rossellini film General Della Rovere. The film tells the story of a poor man in occupied Italy who is caught by the Nazis. Because he resembles a famous resistance leader, General Della Rovere, the Nazis, who have already killed the real General, force him to pretend to be the General in prison to trick the resistance. But something unexpected happens. The man identifies so deeply with the role that he refuses to cooperate with the Nazis. He is ultimately shot publicly as General Della Rovere. Žižek calls this "good alienation." The man's "real self" as a poor beggar mattered less than his complete identification with the heroic persona. Through that total commitment to an outward role, he achieved a kind of moral greatness his "authentic" self never could. The takeaway is counterintuitive but powerful: true freedom doesn't emerge from endlessly excavating your private, internal world. It emerges when you prioritise your outward actions and commitments. When you fully commit to becoming something greater than what you started as. What matters is what you choose to embody.

Philosopher Slavoj Žižek on why searching for your "true self" is a mistake: Žižek argues that the pursuit of a true inner self is ultimately misguided. Deep introspection, he suggests, often reveals only disturbing or chaotic fantasies. "Don't look for your inner self. You'll only find deep shit." Instead of searching for an authentic core, Žižek believes genuine personal growth comes from embracing an external mask, a chosen social role. "The only way to overcome yourself is to identify with your mask." To illustrate this, he references the 1960 Rossellini film General Della Rovere. The film tells the story of a poor man in occupied Italy who is caught by the Nazis. Because he resembles a famous resistance leader, General Della Rovere, the Nazis, who have already killed the real General, force him to pretend to be the General in prison to trick the resistance. But something unexpected happens. The man identifies so deeply with the role that he refuses to cooperate with the Nazis. He is ultimately shot publicly as General Della Rovere. Žižek calls this "good alienation." The man's "real self" as a poor beggar mattered less than his complete identification with the heroic persona. Through that total commitment to an outward role, he achieved a kind of moral greatness his "authentic" self never could. The takeaway is counterintuitive but powerful: true freedom doesn't emerge from endlessly excavating your private, internal world. It emerges when you prioritise your outward actions and commitments. When you fully commit to becoming something greater than what you started as. What matters is what you choose to embody.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

543,685 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

That walk is earned. Not the kind of thing you just put on and do. It takes real strength, real discipline, real devotion to move like that - to turn something this demanding into this elegant walk. You don’t just see it. You feel the weight of what it took. Do you dare?

That walk is earned. Not the kind of thing you just put on and do. It takes real strength, real discipline, real devotion to move like that - to turn something this demanding into this elegant walk. You don’t just see it. You feel the weight of what it took. Do you dare?

AngryAngel81

67,872 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The Man Who Runs CERN Said Something That Nobody Talks About What is CERN doing? You know that feeling when you remember something with complete certainty and then find out it never happened? Not just you. Millions of people. The same specific wrong memory. Shared by strangers who never met and never compared notes. That is the Mandela Effect. Most people treat it as a fun internet thing. But here is what most people are not connecting. The most powerful particle accelerator ever built, a machine designed to smash atoms apart at nearly the speed of light and access dimensions of reality we have never observed — came online in 2008. The Mandela Effect as a documented widespread phenomenon started in 2009. And the man running the experiments said something publicly that year that almost nobody has heard. In this video we get into all of it. The machine. The memories. The quote. And the question that I think deserves a serious answer.

The Man Who Runs CERN Said Something That Nobody Talks About What is CERN doing? You know that feeling when you remember something with complete certainty and then find out it never happened? Not just you. Millions of people. The same specific wrong memory. Shared by strangers who never met and never compared notes. That is the Mandela Effect. Most people treat it as a fun internet thing. But here is what most people are not connecting. The most powerful particle accelerator ever built, a machine designed to smash atoms apart at nearly the speed of light and access dimensions of reality we have never observed — came online in 2008. The Mandela Effect as a documented widespread phenomenon started in 2009. And the man running the experiments said something publicly that year that almost nobody has heard. In this video we get into all of it. The machine. The memories. The quote. And the question that I think deserves a serious answer.

Jordan Chain

53,820 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

Martha Nussbaum on why Aristotle believed you are not made of matter. In a 1987 interview on the Great Philosophers, philosopher Martha Nussbaum lays out Aristotle's three-part case against material reductionism, the idea that what you fundamentally are is just the stuff you're made of. His argument is more intuitive than it might sound. First: your matter is always changing. "Matter is always going in and out; it's always changing and of course you do change your material constituents very, very often without ceasing to be yourself." Your cells replace themselves. Your body is not the same collection of atoms it was years ago. And yet you are still you. If your identity were your matter, it would vanish and return constantly. But it doesn't. Something persists that isn't the material. Second: what makes a thing that thing is its function, not its parts. Aristotle uses the example of a ship. Replace some of its planks so long as "its functional structure remains the same, we could always replace bits of the matter without having a different thing in our hands." It's still the same ship. The same logic applies to you. Swap out the components, preserve the structure and function and the identity remains intact. This suggests identity lives in the organisation, not the raw material. Third: matter alone is too vague to define anything. This is perhaps his sharpest point. "Matter is just a lump or heap of stuff and so we couldn't say you are some stuff or other; it's only when we've identified the structure that the stuff constitutes that we can even go on to say something intelligent about the stuff itself." In other words: matter, by itself, tells you nothing. It's formless. You need structure form, function, organisation before you can even begin to describe what a thing is. The deeper implication Aristotle is reaching toward: what makes you you isn't a quantity of carbon and water. It's a pattern. A functional whole. A form that persists through constant material flux. Which raises the question if identity isn't located in matter, where exactly does it live?

Martha Nussbaum on why Aristotle believed you are not made of matter. In a 1987 interview on the Great Philosophers, philosopher Martha Nussbaum lays out Aristotle's three-part case against material reductionism, the idea that what you fundamentally are is just the stuff you're made of. His argument is more intuitive than it might sound. First: your matter is always changing. "Matter is always going in and out; it's always changing and of course you do change your material constituents very, very often without ceasing to be yourself." Your cells replace themselves. Your body is not the same collection of atoms it was years ago. And yet you are still you. If your identity were your matter, it would vanish and return constantly. But it doesn't. Something persists that isn't the material. Second: what makes a thing that thing is its function, not its parts. Aristotle uses the example of a ship. Replace some of its planks so long as "its functional structure remains the same, we could always replace bits of the matter without having a different thing in our hands." It's still the same ship. The same logic applies to you. Swap out the components, preserve the structure and function and the identity remains intact. This suggests identity lives in the organisation, not the raw material. Third: matter alone is too vague to define anything. This is perhaps his sharpest point. "Matter is just a lump or heap of stuff and so we couldn't say you are some stuff or other; it's only when we've identified the structure that the stuff constitutes that we can even go on to say something intelligent about the stuff itself." In other words: matter, by itself, tells you nothing. It's formless. You need structure form, function, organisation before you can even begin to describe what a thing is. The deeper implication Aristotle is reaching toward: what makes you you isn't a quantity of carbon and water. It's a pattern. A functional whole. A form that persists through constant material flux. Which raises the question if identity isn't located in matter, where exactly does it live?

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

69,935 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

“Peter Of P-Square Is Very Disrespectful, And The Beginning Of The Problem That Started In Their Family. It All Started When Lola Was Pregnant. He Didn’t Tell Anyone, Not Even His Twin Brother, Whom He Claimed To Love So Much. Not Even His Mother. And What Is The First Thing You Will Do As a 27-Year-Old Who Just Impregnated His Girlfriend, Who Was Nine Years Older Than Him? You Announced It On The Day P-Square Was Receiving An Award, And You Expected Your Brothers Not To Walk Away? It Was Obvious Lola Was Controlling You From The Beginning, And That Destroyed Your Relationship With Your Family.” ~ Oyigidu

“Peter Of P-Square Is Very Disrespectful, And The Beginning Of The Problem That Started In Their Family. It All Started When Lola Was Pregnant. He Didn’t Tell Anyone, Not Even His Twin Brother, Whom He Claimed To Love So Much. Not Even His Mother. And What Is The First Thing You Will Do As a 27-Year-Old Who Just Impregnated His Girlfriend, Who Was Nine Years Older Than Him? You Announced It On The Day P-Square Was Receiving An Award, And You Expected Your Brothers Not To Walk Away? It Was Obvious Lola Was Controlling You From The Beginning, And That Destroyed Your Relationship With Your Family.” ~ Oyigidu

Somto Okonkwo

359,120 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

No one comes out of a broken marriage and feels happy, no matter how it ended. Divorce is the death of something real, something you built, something you believed in. It hurts. It leaves a gap. It changes you. But life does not end there. At some point, you have to stand up again. Not because you feel ready, but because you are still here. Still breathing. Still capable of building something new. You may not be the same person you were before, and that’s fine. You’ve seen more, you’ve learned more, you’re wiser now. Take what it taught you. Leave what broke you. And move forward. 🤷‍♂️

No one comes out of a broken marriage and feels happy, no matter how it ended. Divorce is the death of something real, something you built, something you believed in. It hurts. It leaves a gap. It changes you. But life does not end there. At some point, you have to stand up again. Not because you feel ready, but because you are still here. Still breathing. Still capable of building something new. You may not be the same person you were before, and that’s fine. You’ve seen more, you’ve learned more, you’re wiser now. Take what it taught you. Leave what broke you. And move forward. 🤷‍♂️

The Odin

127,470 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

To be a successful founder, you have to believe that what you're working on is going to work — despite knowing it probably won't! That sounds like an oxymoron, but it's really not. Believing that what you're building is going to work is an essential component of coming to work with the energy, fortitude, and determination it's going to require to even have a shot. Knowing it probably won't is accepting the odds of that shot. It's simply the reality that most things in business don't work out. At least not in the long run. Most businesses fail. If not right away, then eventually. Yet the world economy is full of entrepreneurs who try anyway. Not because they don't know the odds, but because they've chosen to believe they're special. The best way to balance these opposing points — the conviction that you'll make it work, the knowledge that it probably won't — is to do all your work in a manner that'll make you proud either way. If it doesn't work, you still made something you wouldn't be ashamed to put your name on. And if it does work, you'll beam with pride from making it on the basis of something solid. The deep regret from trying and failing only truly hits when you look in the mirror and see Dostoevsky staring back at you with this punch to the gut: "Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing." Oof. Believe it's going to work. Build it in a way that makes you proud to sign it. Base your worth on a human on something greater than a business outcome.

To be a successful founder, you have to believe that what you're working on is going to work — despite knowing it probably won't! That sounds like an oxymoron, but it's really not. Believing that what you're building is going to work is an essential component of coming to work with the energy, fortitude, and determination it's going to require to even have a shot. Knowing it probably won't is accepting the odds of that shot. It's simply the reality that most things in business don't work out. At least not in the long run. Most businesses fail. If not right away, then eventually. Yet the world economy is full of entrepreneurs who try anyway. Not because they don't know the odds, but because they've chosen to believe they're special. The best way to balance these opposing points — the conviction that you'll make it work, the knowledge that it probably won't — is to do all your work in a manner that'll make you proud either way. If it doesn't work, you still made something you wouldn't be ashamed to put your name on. And if it does work, you'll beam with pride from making it on the basis of something solid. The deep regret from trying and failing only truly hits when you look in the mirror and see Dostoevsky staring back at you with this punch to the gut: "Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing." Oof. Believe it's going to work. Build it in a way that makes you proud to sign it. Base your worth on a human on something greater than a business outcome.

DHH

96,558 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Joe Rogan asked Mike Tyson why he still wants to fight at 54. The answer wasn't about money, legacy, or proving anyone wrong. He admits the thing most fighters never say out loud. Tyson: "Sometimes I struggle with the fact that there's the possibility I can really hurt somebody." Rogan assumed that meant guilt. That he didn't want to hurt them. It's the opposite. Tyson: "That is... sometimes it's orgasmic." Not fear. Not nerves. Something closer to pleasure. He can't even fully explain it himself, so he turns the question back on Rogan. Tyson: "What does it mean when fighting gets you erect? What does that mean?" And then he lands on the real thing driving him back into the ring. It isn't the winning. It isn't the crowd. Tyson: "Maybe not fear-based, but embracing the fact that you're gonna go into this with everything you have, the chaos of it all, and the ultimate goal is to hurt somebody." That's the part that separates him. Most people fight to win. Tyson fights for the chaos. The hurting isn't a side effect of the goal. It is the goal.

Sensitive content

Joe Rogan asked Mike Tyson why he still wants to fight at 54. The answer wasn't about money, legacy, or proving anyone wrong. He admits the thing most fighters never say out loud. Tyson: "Sometimes I struggle with the fact that there's the possibility I can really hurt somebody." Rogan assumed that meant guilt. That he didn't want to hurt them. It's the opposite. Tyson: "That is... sometimes it's orgasmic." Not fear. Not nerves. Something closer to pleasure. He can't even fully explain it himself, so he turns the question back on Rogan. Tyson: "What does it mean when fighting gets you erect? What does that mean?" And then he lands on the real thing driving him back into the ring. It isn't the winning. It isn't the crowd. Tyson: "Maybe not fear-based, but embracing the fact that you're gonna go into this with everything you have, the chaos of it all, and the ultimate goal is to hurt somebody." That's the part that separates him. Most people fight to win. Tyson fights for the chaos. The hurting isn't a side effect of the goal. It is the goal.

Johan

98,706 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

What Jealousy Is Really Telling You That tight, hot rush of jealousy — most of us just want it to go away fast. But what if it’s actually trying to tell you something useful? When you pause and get curious instead of fighting it, the feeling can turn into deeper connection and self-awareness. This is a calm, honest conversation about why jealousy isn’t the enemy and how to work with it in any relationship.

What Jealousy Is Really Telling You That tight, hot rush of jealousy — most of us just want it to go away fast. But what if it’s actually trying to tell you something useful? When you pause and get curious instead of fighting it, the feeling can turn into deeper connection and self-awareness. This is a calm, honest conversation about why jealousy isn’t the enemy and how to work with it in any relationship.

Kate Shelor

33,310 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The people who built the welfare state still congratulate themselves to this day. Thomas Sowell points out the obvious problem: they never seriously weighed the collateral damage. The “help” came with costs that were ignored because the architects preferred the feeling of virtue over the results. Walter Williams drives the point home with the simplest rule in economics: if you tax something you get less of it; if you subsidize something you get more of it. For decades, the system has subsidized the very behaviors that destroy families, work habits, and self-reliance. The result is not mysterious. You get more of what you pay for. Free To Choose

The people who built the welfare state still congratulate themselves to this day. Thomas Sowell points out the obvious problem: they never seriously weighed the collateral damage. The “help” came with costs that were ignored because the architects preferred the feeling of virtue over the results. Walter Williams drives the point home with the simplest rule in economics: if you tax something you get less of it; if you subsidize something you get more of it. For decades, the system has subsidized the very behaviors that destroy families, work habits, and self-reliance. The result is not mysterious. You get more of what you pay for. Free To Choose

Commentary - Sowell Economics

24,364 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

Jordan Peterson on what to do when you don't know what you want from life: 1. Don't start with the big goal. you won't find it by staring at the horizon. look around you instead, at your direct sphere of influence, and fix the things that are obviously in need of repair. they're usually small. 2. clean your room. i know it turned into a joke online. it's harder than people think, and more useful too. the point isn't the tidy room. the point is you learn to tell chaos from order, and to act in a way that produces order. 3. ask yourself, don't tell yourself. instead of "do this," ask "what could i do today that i'd actually do, that makes tomorrow a little better than today?" it's usually some small thing, because you're not that disciplined. that's fine. 4. it'll be the toad. the thing you keep avoiding. the task that feels like a snake. that's the one. do it anyway. 5. then it compounds. you fix one thing, you get a bit stronger, the next day you take on something slightly bigger. compound interest. and at some point you stop just patching what's broken, and you catch a glimmer of something positive you could build. that's your vision. it shows up at the end, not the start.

Jordan Peterson on what to do when you don't know what you want from life: 1. Don't start with the big goal. you won't find it by staring at the horizon. look around you instead, at your direct sphere of influence, and fix the things that are obviously in need of repair. they're usually small. 2. clean your room. i know it turned into a joke online. it's harder than people think, and more useful too. the point isn't the tidy room. the point is you learn to tell chaos from order, and to act in a way that produces order. 3. ask yourself, don't tell yourself. instead of "do this," ask "what could i do today that i'd actually do, that makes tomorrow a little better than today?" it's usually some small thing, because you're not that disciplined. that's fine. 4. it'll be the toad. the thing you keep avoiding. the task that feels like a snake. that's the one. do it anyway. 5. then it compounds. you fix one thing, you get a bit stronger, the next day you take on something slightly bigger. compound interest. and at some point you stop just patching what's broken, and you catch a glimmer of something positive you could build. that's your vision. it shows up at the end, not the start.

Naruto

44,262 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce