Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Slotkin points out that Hegseth’s statement during the hearing yesterday in House was misleading when he appeared to suggest the federal government deployed troops to polling locations.

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

748,852 subscribers

23,208 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

When asked if he would deploy troops to polling locations if asked by Trump, Hegseth responds by saying that troops were deployed to polling locations in 2024.
0:42

When asked if he would deploy troops to polling locations if asked by Trump, Hegseth responds by saying that troops were deployed to polling locations in 2024.

Acyn

40,329 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WOW! Pete Hegseth just LIED under oath. Congresswoman Jill N. Tokuda: “Who would you follow? The president or the Constitution?” Pete Hegseth: "I will note, that in 2024 troops were — that was Joe Biden by the way — were deployed to polling locations in the United States. 2024, Joe Biden, troops were deployed to polling locations in 15 states. Explain that one to me.” This is a lie. No troops were deployed to polling locations in the United States under Joe Biden. Grok fact check me.
0:23

WOW! Pete Hegseth just LIED under oath. Congresswoman Jill N. Tokuda: “Who would you follow? The president or the Constitution?” Pete Hegseth: "I will note, that in 2024 troops were — that was Joe Biden by the way — were deployed to polling locations in the United States. 2024, Joe Biden, troops were deployed to polling locations in 15 states. Explain that one to me.” This is a lie. No troops were deployed to polling locations in the United States under Joe Biden. Grok fact check me.

Ed Krassenstein

1,347,302 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WOW Pete Hegseth just lied under oath before Congress. Asked whether he’d follow the President or the Constitution, he claimed Biden deployed troops to polling locations in 15 states in 2024. It never happened. Federal law prohibits deploying armed forces to polling locations. It didn’t happen under Biden. It didn’t happen under any president. He lied. Under oath. To Congress.
0:23

WOW Pete Hegseth just lied under oath before Congress. Asked whether he’d follow the President or the Constitution, he claimed Biden deployed troops to polling locations in 15 states in 2024. It never happened. Federal law prohibits deploying armed forces to polling locations. It didn’t happen under Biden. It didn’t happen under any president. He lied. Under oath. To Congress.

Brian Allen

207,120 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Slotkin: "If you were asked to approve the placement of uniform military on and around polling locations for a federal election in 2026, what would your legal judgment be?" Pentagon Principle Deputy General Counsel Charles Young: " There are federal laws that prohibit the stationing of troops at polling places. However, the question would be the degree to which that would apply in a non-federalized status…and it would depend on the status of the personnel and the mission parameters." Slotkin: "So it's possible?”
2:14

Slotkin: "If you were asked to approve the placement of uniform military on and around polling locations for a federal election in 2026, what would your legal judgment be?" Pentagon Principle Deputy General Counsel Charles Young: " There are federal laws that prohibit the stationing of troops at polling places. However, the question would be the degree to which that would apply in a non-federalized status…and it would depend on the status of the personnel and the mission parameters." Slotkin: "So it's possible?”

The Bulwark

157,883 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

TOKUDA: If President Trump ordered you to deploy troops to polling places this fall, which would violate the law I just cited, would you implement his order? HEGSETH: I will note that in 2024, Joe Biden deployed troops to polling locations in 15 states. Explain that to me TOKUDA: You seem to really like Joe Biden
1:49

TOKUDA: If President Trump ordered you to deploy troops to polling places this fall, which would violate the law I just cited, would you implement his order? HEGSETH: I will note that in 2024, Joe Biden deployed troops to polling locations in 15 states. Explain that to me TOKUDA: You seem to really like Joe Biden

Aaron Rupar

135,221 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

During the Weaponization hearing, Seligman says the biggest proponents of measures that would handicap efforts to combat misinformation are often purveyors of misinformation. He points out that many of the Republican members of the committee spread lies about the 2020 election
2:01

During the Weaponization hearing, Seligman says the biggest proponents of measures that would handicap efforts to combat misinformation are often purveyors of misinformation. He points out that many of the Republican members of the committee spread lies about the 2020 election

Acyn

789,873 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Bass: If you want to go back in time, where was LA on Thursday? Fine, peaceful. Nothing was happening. The minute ICE rolled into town, that's when the chaos started and then add to that—bringing in federal troops.
2:45

Bass: If you want to go back in time, where was LA on Thursday? Fine, peaceful. Nothing was happening. The minute ICE rolled into town, that's when the chaos started and then add to that—bringing in federal troops.

Acyn

95,860 просмотров • 1 год назад

SLOTKIN: Do you believe that ICE has the authority to be deployed to US polling places? LYONS: There's no reason for us to deploy to a polling facility SLOTKIN: So if the president gets you on the phone and says he needs you to go and physically deploy around polling places, you'll say no? LYONS: There's no reason for us to deploy, but we do investigate voter fraud
1:59

SLOTKIN: Do you believe that ICE has the authority to be deployed to US polling places? LYONS: There's no reason for us to deploy to a polling facility SLOTKIN: So if the president gets you on the phone and says he needs you to go and physically deploy around polling places, you'll say no? LYONS: There's no reason for us to deploy, but we do investigate voter fraud

Aaron Rupar

96,822 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Jennings: In the case of Miles Taylor, was working in the government anonymously, obviously disseminating information publicly that he should not have been doing. Phillip: Like what? Jennings: Well, I mean, he was anonymously writing pieces for the New York Times and stating publicly that he was trying to undermine the government of the United States Philip: What did he disseminate that he was legally not allowed to do? Jennings: Great thing to find out Phillip: He wrote a book. What’s the allegation? There not allowed to talk about their experiences when they leave government? Jennigs: I’m saying he used his position to try to undermine the sitting president..
1:10

Jennings: In the case of Miles Taylor, was working in the government anonymously, obviously disseminating information publicly that he should not have been doing. Phillip: Like what? Jennings: Well, I mean, he was anonymously writing pieces for the New York Times and stating publicly that he was trying to undermine the government of the United States Philip: What did he disseminate that he was legally not allowed to do? Jennings: Great thing to find out Phillip: He wrote a book. What’s the allegation? There not allowed to talk about their experiences when they leave government? Jennigs: I’m saying he used his position to try to undermine the sitting president..

Acyn

445,603 просмотров • 1 год назад

SLOTKIN: Who won the 2020 election? MARKWAYNE MULLIN: We know that President Joe Biden was sworn into office SLOTKIN: Do you feel you have the authority to put uniformed officers at polling locations in 2026? MULLIN: Only if there is a specific threat, not for intimidation
3:16

SLOTKIN: Who won the 2020 election? MARKWAYNE MULLIN: We know that President Joe Biden was sworn into office SLOTKIN: Do you feel you have the authority to put uniformed officers at polling locations in 2026? MULLIN: Only if there is a specific threat, not for intimidation

Aaron Rupar

120,040 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kudos to Sen. Slotkin for getting that preening, frat boy jackass Pete Hegseth to commit to not breaking the law, and for debunking the lie that President Biden deployed the military to polling stations. That clown Hegseth is exhausting.
2:59

Kudos to Sen. Slotkin for getting that preening, frat boy jackass Pete Hegseth to commit to not breaking the law, and for debunking the lie that President Biden deployed the military to polling stations. That clown Hegseth is exhausting.

BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️

49,969 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Collins: I am told that one thing that irked him particularly was during that hearing today when the magistrate judge referred to him as simply Mr. Trump
0:25

Collins: I am told that one thing that irked him particularly was during that hearing today when the magistrate judge referred to him as simply Mr. Trump

Acyn

3,414,216 просмотров • 3 лет назад

USDP Elbridge Colby confirmed during today's HASC hearing that the Pentagon will honor President Trump's pledge to keep US troops in Poland. He was less sure about the other brigades in EUCOM
0:56

USDP Elbridge Colby confirmed during today's HASC hearing that the Pentagon will honor President Trump's pledge to keep US troops in Poland. He was less sure about the other brigades in EUCOM

Oskar Górzyński

31,860 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bonta: She was really miffed. Her first set of questions to the federal government was: How does this not violate my order from yesterday? Just minutes before the hearing commenced, we got word through a memorandum from Secretary Hegseth that the Texas National Guard has been federalized — 2,000 of them — with 400 being deployed to both Portland and Chicago. So it’s clear that this is a sort of whack-a-mole approach from the federal government: You stop the Oregon National Guard from being federalized? Fine — we’ll bring in the California National Guard. You stop the California Guard from being brought up north? We’ll bring in the Texas National Guard. So we asked the judge to issue a broad order — one that applies to every National Guard unit in every state and the District of Columbia — stating that none of them can be federalized and deployed to Oregon. She issued that order from the bench and will follow it up with a written order as well. The conditions haven’t changed in 24 hours. National Guard deployment in Oregon was unlawful yesterday — and it's still unlawful today. It doesn't matter where the National Guard comes from — whether it's Oregon’s, California’s, or Texas’s. And I think the judge nailed it. The Trump-appointed judge nailed it.
2:51

Bonta: She was really miffed. Her first set of questions to the federal government was: How does this not violate my order from yesterday? Just minutes before the hearing commenced, we got word through a memorandum from Secretary Hegseth that the Texas National Guard has been federalized — 2,000 of them — with 400 being deployed to both Portland and Chicago. So it’s clear that this is a sort of whack-a-mole approach from the federal government: You stop the Oregon National Guard from being federalized? Fine — we’ll bring in the California National Guard. You stop the California Guard from being brought up north? We’ll bring in the Texas National Guard. So we asked the judge to issue a broad order — one that applies to every National Guard unit in every state and the District of Columbia — stating that none of them can be federalized and deployed to Oregon. She issued that order from the bench and will follow it up with a written order as well. The conditions haven’t changed in 24 hours. National Guard deployment in Oregon was unlawful yesterday — and it's still unlawful today. It doesn't matter where the National Guard comes from — whether it's Oregon’s, California’s, or Texas’s. And I think the judge nailed it. The Trump-appointed judge nailed it.

Acyn

377,755 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

OSSOFF: Mr. Clayton had a disastrous hearing yesterday. He was obviously evasive. He was stonewalling. His testimony lacked credibility. And this is a position of immense public trust and responsibility for America's national security. He demonstrated clearly in yesterday's hearing that he lacks the integrity and the Independence to be confirmed of his role.
0:31

OSSOFF: Mr. Clayton had a disastrous hearing yesterday. He was obviously evasive. He was stonewalling. His testimony lacked credibility. And this is a position of immense public trust and responsibility for America's national security. He demonstrated clearly in yesterday's hearing that he lacks the integrity and the Independence to be confirmed of his role.

Acyn

33,236 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Barr: The federal government has to have… complete authority in the federal zone.
0:52

Barr: The federal government has to have… complete authority in the federal zone.

Acyn

33,327 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

President Donald Trump, when asked Tuesday about the possibility of federal agents at polling places during the November midterm elections, told PBS News’ Liz Landers (Liz Landers) that he supports "anything" to ensure "honest elections." Federal law bars the deployment of “troops or armed men” at polling stations and prohibits voter intimidation. The Department of Homeland Security told state officials earlier this year that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents will not be present at voting locations during the midterm elections. Yet other Trump administration officials have not unequivocally knocked down the idea. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said earlier this month that he was “not sure of the uproar of the risk of having a Border Patrol or an ICE agent at a polling location, or looking into whether somebody is voting that shouldn't be.” Federal law prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections; some municipalities allow them to vote in local elections.
0:37

President Donald Trump, when asked Tuesday about the possibility of federal agents at polling places during the November midterm elections, told PBS News’ Liz Landers (Liz Landers) that he supports "anything" to ensure "honest elections." Federal law bars the deployment of “troops or armed men” at polling stations and prohibits voter intimidation. The Department of Homeland Security told state officials earlier this year that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents will not be present at voting locations during the midterm elections. Yet other Trump administration officials have not unequivocally knocked down the idea. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said earlier this month that he was “not sure of the uproar of the risk of having a Border Patrol or an ICE agent at a polling location, or looking into whether somebody is voting that shouldn't be.” Federal law prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections; some municipalities allow them to vote in local elections.

PBS News

23,519 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ingraham: Perhaps, the most scathing criticism of Bondi was about her handling of the Epstein files. During the campaign, the president made a clear promise to voters that those files would come out. And when he won, he handed that responsibility to Bondi.
1:30

Ingraham: Perhaps, the most scathing criticism of Bondi was about her handling of the Epstein files. During the campaign, the president made a clear promise to voters that those files would come out. And when he won, he handed that responsibility to Bondi.

Acyn

89,623 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад