Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Smithsonian history museum director stumbles when asked basic questions about biological sex and gender. During a contentious House hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace repeatedly pressed Director Anthea Hartig on whether men can become women, what defines a woman, and how many genders there are. Hartig repeatedly declined to directly answer... show more

Fox News

29,286,428 subscribers

526,785 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“Is Mickey Mouse racist?” That’s the question Congressman Brandon Gill asked Smithsonian Director Anthea Hartig point-blank during a House hearing Tuesday. The director faced pointed questions from House Republicans over "woke" exhibits and materials, including a display linking Mickey Mouse to racism.

“Is Mickey Mouse racist?” That’s the question Congressman Brandon Gill asked Smithsonian Director Anthea Hartig point-blank during a House hearing Tuesday. The director faced pointed questions from House Republicans over "woke" exhibits and materials, including a display linking Mickey Mouse to racism.

Fox News

693,794 views • 2 days ago

"I don't have any regrets." The director of the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History is under fire after defending the museum's exhibits during a tense House hearing. When Republican Rep. Brian Jack asked whether she regretted any exhibits displayed during her tenure, director Anthea Hartig replied, "I am incredibly proud of the work we've done... But I don't have any regrets." Pressed on what mistakes had been made, Hartig said, "There are always factual errors." The exchange came moments after Heritage Foundation senior fellow Mike Gonzalez blasted a museum exhibit suggesting Benjamin Franklin may have conducted electrical experiments on indentured servants or enslaved people — despite, he said, offering "no evidence whatsoever."

"I don't have any regrets." The director of the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History is under fire after defending the museum's exhibits during a tense House hearing. When Republican Rep. Brian Jack asked whether she regretted any exhibits displayed during her tenure, director Anthea Hartig replied, "I am incredibly proud of the work we've done... But I don't have any regrets." Pressed on what mistakes had been made, Hartig said, "There are always factual errors." The exchange came moments after Heritage Foundation senior fellow Mike Gonzalez blasted a museum exhibit suggesting Benjamin Franklin may have conducted electrical experiments on indentured servants or enslaved people — despite, he said, offering "no evidence whatsoever."

Fox News

413,348 views • 21 hours ago

We can’t make this shit up! Director Hartig, Smithsonian’s Director of American History Museum, is SUPPOSED to be in charge of and aware of all that goes on in that facility. What I saw was a woman attempting to act ignorant on programs she is very aware of, but her acting skills weren’t as convincing as she was hoping. Issue of concern brought up by Congressman Brandon Gill: 1) ‘Latina Power’ paraphernalia is sold there and according to Dir Hartig, “we strive to service all Americans in our museum.” I bet she wouldn’t feel the same way if ‘White Power’ paraphernalia was recommended for sale there.😏 2) She claims that Mickey Mouse is not racist, while claiming it has traditional roots in black face minstrelsy … then admitting that minstrelsy has obvious overtones of racism that has been well documented. So … according to Dir. Hartig, Mickey Mouse isn’t racist BUT has racist overtones.🤦🏽‍♀️ 3) ‘Politeness is important’, Dir. Hartig says. All while her own Smithsonian Mass Action Toolkit calls ‘politeness’ as part of White Supremacy. So … is she attempting to give all the crazy arse black women, going apeshit nuts in society, a pass … and all the random beat downs by black men an excuse?!🤦🏽‍♀️ • Black Americans (around 13-14% of the U.S. population) account for roughly 25-35% of arrests overall and a higher share of violent crime arrests/offenses, per FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) and Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) data. 4) Dir. Hartig says that they [Smithsonian] strive to be objective and nonpartisan and not based on any ideology about history. All while the Smithsonian Mass Action Toolkit calls ‘Objectively’ as one of the core and defining aspects of White Supremacy Culture.😳

We can’t make this shit up! Director Hartig, Smithsonian’s Director of American History Museum, is SUPPOSED to be in charge of and aware of all that goes on in that facility. What I saw was a woman attempting to act ignorant on programs she is very aware of, but her acting skills weren’t as convincing as she was hoping. Issue of concern brought up by Congressman Brandon Gill: 1) ‘Latina Power’ paraphernalia is sold there and according to Dir Hartig, “we strive to service all Americans in our museum.” I bet she wouldn’t feel the same way if ‘White Power’ paraphernalia was recommended for sale there.😏 2) She claims that Mickey Mouse is not racist, while claiming it has traditional roots in black face minstrelsy … then admitting that minstrelsy has obvious overtones of racism that has been well documented. So … according to Dir. Hartig, Mickey Mouse isn’t racist BUT has racist overtones.🤦🏽‍♀️ 3) ‘Politeness is important’, Dir. Hartig says. All while her own Smithsonian Mass Action Toolkit calls ‘politeness’ as part of White Supremacy. So … is she attempting to give all the crazy arse black women, going apeshit nuts in society, a pass … and all the random beat downs by black men an excuse?!🤦🏽‍♀️ • Black Americans (around 13-14% of the U.S. population) account for roughly 25-35% of arrests overall and a higher share of violent crime arrests/offenses, per FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) and Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) data. 4) Dir. Hartig says that they [Smithsonian] strive to be objective and nonpartisan and not based on any ideology about history. All while the Smithsonian Mass Action Toolkit calls ‘Objectively’ as one of the core and defining aspects of White Supremacy Culture.😳

C-Reason🇺🇸

13,091 views • 2 days ago

Mike Gonzalez, senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told Congress they need to “clean out house at the Smithsonian,” during a House Oversight subcommittee hearing Tuesday focused on the way the Smithsonian Institution presents scholarship on U.S. history. Rep. Brian Jack, R-Ga., asked Gonzalez what Congress should do to fix what he described as an “ideological takeover of many of our institutions.” Jack said it was “clearly a problem” that is “dividing our country.” Gonzalez said that “trying to reform with the present leadership” wouldn’t do anything. “They're committed to the things they want to do,” he said. “We only have to listen to what they say and look at the evidence of what they have produced.” Gonzalez said the Smithsonian’s exhibit review process, which the director of the National Museum of American History had previously detailed, isn't “going to fix anything.” In announcing the hearing, the Republican-led committee claimed that the “Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History is promoting a narrow, politically tendentious agenda instead of seeking to instill in visitors an appreciation for America’s unique history as a beacon of liberty, democracy, and opportunity.” In President Donald Trump’s second term, his administration has sought to clamp down on how American history is framed in public spaces, removing exhibits from national parks on slavery and violence against Native Americans. The hearing is one of two scheduled for this week in the House focused on the Smithsonian.

Mike Gonzalez, senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told Congress they need to “clean out house at the Smithsonian,” during a House Oversight subcommittee hearing Tuesday focused on the way the Smithsonian Institution presents scholarship on U.S. history. Rep. Brian Jack, R-Ga., asked Gonzalez what Congress should do to fix what he described as an “ideological takeover of many of our institutions.” Jack said it was “clearly a problem” that is “dividing our country.” Gonzalez said that “trying to reform with the present leadership” wouldn’t do anything. “They're committed to the things they want to do,” he said. “We only have to listen to what they say and look at the evidence of what they have produced.” Gonzalez said the Smithsonian’s exhibit review process, which the director of the National Museum of American History had previously detailed, isn't “going to fix anything.” In announcing the hearing, the Republican-led committee claimed that the “Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History is promoting a narrow, politically tendentious agenda instead of seeking to instill in visitors an appreciation for America’s unique history as a beacon of liberty, democracy, and opportunity.” In President Donald Trump’s second term, his administration has sought to clamp down on how American history is framed in public spaces, removing exhibits from national parks on slavery and violence against Native Americans. The hearing is one of two scheduled for this week in the House focused on the Smithsonian.

PBS News

23,367 views • 2 days ago

🔥 Vivek Ramaswamy Schools Reporter Who Tries to Maintain the January 6th Narrative "You asked me yesterday about would I be...a little bit more responsible about how we talk about the events of January 6 and whatever happened? And I specifically asked about the number of undercover FBI agents who were in the field. And you said, Christopher Wray has repeatedly said that there were none. That's what you told me. Well, I went back to specifically the testimony...That's just not what he said. Christopher Wray repeatedly, when asked and pressed by Clay Higgins, a congressman from Louisiana. He repeatedly pressed him, and Christopher Wray said, for all kinds of reasons, he's not going to state how many federal agents or whether there were federal agents in the field or whether there were informants in the field. And I think, in your case, I don't think that that was an intentional gotcha, but I think that this becomes part of the actual narrative, part of the baseline narrative, that it then misleads the public." Vivek Ramaswamy Rep. Clay Higgins

🔥 Vivek Ramaswamy Schools Reporter Who Tries to Maintain the January 6th Narrative "You asked me yesterday about would I be...a little bit more responsible about how we talk about the events of January 6 and whatever happened? And I specifically asked about the number of undercover FBI agents who were in the field. And you said, Christopher Wray has repeatedly said that there were none. That's what you told me. Well, I went back to specifically the testimony...That's just not what he said. Christopher Wray repeatedly, when asked and pressed by Clay Higgins, a congressman from Louisiana. He repeatedly pressed him, and Christopher Wray said, for all kinds of reasons, he's not going to state how many federal agents or whether there were federal agents in the field or whether there were informants in the field. And I think, in your case, I don't think that that was an intentional gotcha, but I think that this becomes part of the actual narrative, part of the baseline narrative, that it then misleads the public." Vivek Ramaswamy Rep. Clay Higgins

Chief Nerd

607,751 views • 2 years ago

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez declined to weigh in when asked about the growing controversy surrounding Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner. The questions came after multiple women accused Platner of abusive behavior and raised concerns about a Totenkopf tattoo — an emblem historically associated with Nazi death camp guards. One former girlfriend alleged Platner fantasized about rape and violence, while another described what she said were troubling encounters during their relationship. Platner has denied wrongdoing and pushed back on the allegations. As scrutiny surrounding the candidate intensifies, Ocasio-Cortez repeatedly avoided directly addressing the claims when pressed by reporters.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez declined to weigh in when asked about the growing controversy surrounding Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner. The questions came after multiple women accused Platner of abusive behavior and raised concerns about a Totenkopf tattoo — an emblem historically associated with Nazi death camp guards. One former girlfriend alleged Platner fantasized about rape and violence, while another described what she said were troubling encounters during their relationship. Platner has denied wrongdoing and pushed back on the allegations. As scrutiny surrounding the candidate intensifies, Ocasio-Cortez repeatedly avoided directly addressing the claims when pressed by reporters.

Fox News

305,516 views • 1 month ago

Megan Twohey: "We asked the White House about whether or not they had drug tested Musk, and they refused to answer those questions." She then explains that, after Elon smoked weed on Joe Rogan, Space-X started giving him advance notice of when drug testing would happen.

Megan Twohey: "We asked the White House about whether or not they had drug tested Musk, and they refused to answer those questions." She then explains that, after Elon smoked weed on Joe Rogan, Space-X started giving him advance notice of when drug testing would happen.

Blue Georgia

262,060 views • 1 year ago

GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert grilled the Smithsonian yesterday because she thinks a museum dedicated to American history should feature “tens of millions of aborted babies.” I just… Huh? That’s not how history museums work, space cadet. They preserve and interpret history. They don’t exist to check every box on a politician’s culture war wish list. The hearing was supposed to evaluate the Smithsonian. Instead, it became an exhibit on the GOPs own ignorance of what museums are for. Colorado, the country, deserves better, and smarter, than this.

GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert grilled the Smithsonian yesterday because she thinks a museum dedicated to American history should feature “tens of millions of aborted babies.” I just… Huh? That’s not how history museums work, space cadet. They preserve and interpret history. They don’t exist to check every box on a politician’s culture war wish list. The hearing was supposed to evaluate the Smithsonian. Instead, it became an exhibit on the GOPs own ignorance of what museums are for. Colorado, the country, deserves better, and smarter, than this.

Dittie

29,369 views • 2 days ago

To give people an idea of how bad things were in the budget hearing earlier, this was VP Sara Duterte repeatedly refusing to answer the questions of House Deputy Majority Leader Janette Garin (1st district Iloilo - Lakas-CMD), choosing instead to repeat the line "I will forego the opportunity to defend the OVP 2025 budget proposal in a question and answer. I will leave it to the House of Representatives to decide the proposal." This same mantra went on for about 3 hours. She refused to answer any questions.

To give people an idea of how bad things were in the budget hearing earlier, this was VP Sara Duterte repeatedly refusing to answer the questions of House Deputy Majority Leader Janette Garin (1st district Iloilo - Lakas-CMD), choosing instead to repeat the line "I will forego the opportunity to defend the OVP 2025 budget proposal in a question and answer. I will leave it to the House of Representatives to decide the proposal." This same mantra went on for about 3 hours. She refused to answer any questions.

Ivan 🇵🇭🇻🇦

150,318 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BOOM! Tulsi Gabbard just lit a fire under Washington. She says more than 120 taxpayer-funded biolabs across 30 countries have been hidden from public scrutiny and claims Americans were repeatedly misled about gain-of-function research. Then she directly called out Anthony Fauci and other officials, accusing them of covering up information and attacking those who asked questions. “Not only did they lie, they threatened those who tried to expose the truth.” For years Americans were told not to ask questions. Now those questions are getting louder. If Tulsi’s allegations are true, this could become one of the biggest scandals in modern government history. The Deep State won’t like this one.

🚨 BOOM! Tulsi Gabbard just lit a fire under Washington. She says more than 120 taxpayer-funded biolabs across 30 countries have been hidden from public scrutiny and claims Americans were repeatedly misled about gain-of-function research. Then she directly called out Anthony Fauci and other officials, accusing them of covering up information and attacking those who asked questions. “Not only did they lie, they threatened those who tried to expose the truth.” For years Americans were told not to ask questions. Now those questions are getting louder. If Tulsi’s allegations are true, this could become one of the biggest scandals in modern government history. The Deep State won’t like this one.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

74,322 views • 1 month ago

🚨 SUBPOENA BILL GATES Rep. Nancy Mace has formally demanded that Bill Gates testify under oath about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Not rumours. Not gossip. Under oath. She says the files contain disturbing allegations — including claims involving secretive behaviour and questions raised in emails referenced publicly this week. Her position is simple: Nobody is above the law. Not billionaires. Not former presidents. Not political powerhouses. Mace says she wants answers to basic questions: Who knew what? When did they know it? Who was present? Were any girls underage? Did anyone participate? She also says over 1,000 alleged victims cannot equal only one accomplice. If there was a trafficking network, there were witnesses. There were facilitators. There were clients. Now she’s calling for all of them to face questioning. Not selective outrage. Not partisan protection. Full testimony. Full transparency. Under oath. The pressure is no longer limited to social media. It’s inside Congress. Rep. Nancy Mace

🚨 SUBPOENA BILL GATES Rep. Nancy Mace has formally demanded that Bill Gates testify under oath about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Not rumours. Not gossip. Under oath. She says the files contain disturbing allegations — including claims involving secretive behaviour and questions raised in emails referenced publicly this week. Her position is simple: Nobody is above the law. Not billionaires. Not former presidents. Not political powerhouses. Mace says she wants answers to basic questions: Who knew what? When did they know it? Who was present? Were any girls underage? Did anyone participate? She also says over 1,000 alleged victims cannot equal only one accomplice. If there was a trafficking network, there were witnesses. There were facilitators. There were clients. Now she’s calling for all of them to face questioning. Not selective outrage. Not partisan protection. Full testimony. Full transparency. Under oath. The pressure is no longer limited to social media. It’s inside Congress. Rep. Nancy Mace

Jim Ferguson

30,455 views • 5 months ago

Rep. Nancy Mace on Ilhan Omar Investigation: “Let the Process Play Out? Nothing Ever Happens.” Our reporter, Alison Steinberg, asked Rep. Nancy Mace where the investigation into Rep. Rep. Ilhan Omar Omar stands amid questions about her citizenship and the referral to the House Ethics Committee. Mace said she attempted to subpoena immigration records tied to Omar, but the effort went nowhere. “The mark is always ‘let the process play out,’ right? That’s what they always say - and nothing ever happens,” Mace said. She added that a motion tied to the issue was ultimately killed by Republicans, arguing that too often both parties close ranks when investigations get close to their own members. The question now: Will the Ethics Committee actually act - or will the investigation stall once again?

Rep. Nancy Mace on Ilhan Omar Investigation: “Let the Process Play Out? Nothing Ever Happens.” Our reporter, Alison Steinberg, asked Rep. Nancy Mace where the investigation into Rep. Rep. Ilhan Omar Omar stands amid questions about her citizenship and the referral to the House Ethics Committee. Mace said she attempted to subpoena immigration records tied to Omar, but the effort went nowhere. “The mark is always ‘let the process play out,’ right? That’s what they always say - and nothing ever happens,” Mace said. She added that a motion tied to the issue was ultimately killed by Republicans, arguing that too often both parties close ranks when investigations get close to their own members. The question now: Will the Ethics Committee actually act - or will the investigation stall once again?

LindellTV

72,314 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Rubio SHUTS DOWN the Democrat tantrum in real time! 🔥 "What is this? A dunk tank?" Secretary of State Marco Rubio fires back after Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove repeatedly interrupts him, hurls corruption accusations, and refuses to let him answer during the House Foreign Affairs hearing. "Why am I here if I don’t get to answer your questions or your defamatory statements? You get five minutes to talk and no time to respond? That’s not a hearing!" Classic leftist playbook: sling mud, dodge facts, then storm out. Rubio wasn’t having it. 💪 A. YES — Rubio crushed it and exposed the circus B. NO — Democrats were right to grill him

🚨 Rubio SHUTS DOWN the Democrat tantrum in real time! 🔥 "What is this? A dunk tank?" Secretary of State Marco Rubio fires back after Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove repeatedly interrupts him, hurls corruption accusations, and refuses to let him answer during the House Foreign Affairs hearing. "Why am I here if I don’t get to answer your questions or your defamatory statements? You get five minutes to talk and no time to respond? That’s not a hearing!" Classic leftist playbook: sling mud, dodge facts, then storm out. Rubio wasn’t having it. 💪 A. YES — Rubio crushed it and exposed the circus B. NO — Democrats were right to grill him

Right Scope 🇺🇸

37,609 views • 1 month ago

This man’s message is not only powerful, but it’s on the money: “…There are ONLY biological men and there are ONLY biological women. And a man can’t become a woman and a woman can’t become a man. I don’t care what you cut off and I don’t care what you put on.… I have a five year old granddaughter. They want boys in her bathroom in public places. I know the mind of a man, he don’t need to be in no girls bathroom… We want to coddle people and give special rights, so they don feel offended and we’re willing to sacrifice our children on that altar….”

This man’s message is not only powerful, but it’s on the money: “…There are ONLY biological men and there are ONLY biological women. And a man can’t become a woman and a woman can’t become a man. I don’t care what you cut off and I don’t care what you put on.… I have a five year old granddaughter. They want boys in her bathroom in public places. I know the mind of a man, he don’t need to be in no girls bathroom… We want to coddle people and give special rights, so they don feel offended and we’re willing to sacrifice our children on that altar….”

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

49,934 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Kweisi Mfume, D-Md., said Black Americans are “outraged at what is happening now with these efforts to do away with the African American museum and all of the Smithsonian,” during a House Oversight subcommittee hearing Tuesday. “If you erase it, we will replace it,” Mfume said. “It’s that damn simple.” In his comments, Mfume quoted former President Abraham Lincoln and said “history taught us and still teaches us that we can't keep making the same mistakes.” Mfume said he sat at the hearing “as a Black man who grew up in segregation, who wasn't allowed to go certain places, who drank from a water fountain that said colored, who found his mother and his father unable to do anything other than basic day work.” “We will not let you destroy that museum. No matter how long it takes, how many battles are required, how much effort is needed, we will not allow that to happen,” Mfume said. “Unless you find a way to kill all of us and walk over our bodies to change history.” The hearing focused on the way the Smithsonian Institution presents scholarship on U.S. history. In announcing the hearing, the Republican-led committee claimed that the “Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History is promoting a narrow, politically tendentious agenda instead of seeking to instill in visitors an appreciation for America’s unique history as a beacon of liberty, democracy, and opportunity.” In President Donald Trump’s second term, his administration has sought to clamp down on how American history is framed in public spaces, removing exhibits from national parks on slavery and violence against Native Americans.

Rep. Kweisi Mfume, D-Md., said Black Americans are “outraged at what is happening now with these efforts to do away with the African American museum and all of the Smithsonian,” during a House Oversight subcommittee hearing Tuesday. “If you erase it, we will replace it,” Mfume said. “It’s that damn simple.” In his comments, Mfume quoted former President Abraham Lincoln and said “history taught us and still teaches us that we can't keep making the same mistakes.” Mfume said he sat at the hearing “as a Black man who grew up in segregation, who wasn't allowed to go certain places, who drank from a water fountain that said colored, who found his mother and his father unable to do anything other than basic day work.” “We will not let you destroy that museum. No matter how long it takes, how many battles are required, how much effort is needed, we will not allow that to happen,” Mfume said. “Unless you find a way to kill all of us and walk over our bodies to change history.” The hearing focused on the way the Smithsonian Institution presents scholarship on U.S. history. In announcing the hearing, the Republican-led committee claimed that the “Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History is promoting a narrow, politically tendentious agenda instead of seeking to instill in visitors an appreciation for America’s unique history as a beacon of liberty, democracy, and opportunity.” In President Donald Trump’s second term, his administration has sought to clamp down on how American history is framed in public spaces, removing exhibits from national parks on slavery and violence against Native Americans.

PBS News

24,486 views • 2 days ago

The State of Utah has just confirmed that there will be graphic details shared today in the exhibits. “I wanted to give the court just a brief roadmap, but part of that was Exhibits 7, 8, and 9 that we propose introducing will be graphic in nature. And those were the exhibits I was referring to at the last hearing where we would like to take a short break before they were published, if they are published, whether it be by way of video and/or audio.” Judge Graf has determined that a monitor will be placed on the far side of the courtroom off camera to ensure any graphic exhibits are not broadcast.

The State of Utah has just confirmed that there will be graphic details shared today in the exhibits. “I wanted to give the court just a brief roadmap, but part of that was Exhibits 7, 8, and 9 that we propose introducing will be graphic in nature. And those were the exhibits I was referring to at the last hearing where we would like to take a short break before they were published, if they are published, whether it be by way of video and/or audio.” Judge Graf has determined that a monitor will be placed on the far side of the courtroom off camera to ensure any graphic exhibits are not broadcast.

Andrew Kolvet

105,844 views • 18 days ago

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz suggests James Clapper be questioned by Congress on allegations he ran a program to shoot down and retrieve UAP Christopher Sharp: “There are some really, really alarming allegations surrounding James Clapper. The allegation is that him and Stephanie O’Sullivan, when he was Director of National Intelligence, ran a program to detect, shoot down, and retrieve UFOs.” Gaetz: “I wish I would’ve known that when I was asking him questions under oath. I would’ve found a way to make it relevant. I’m sure former Director Clapper is still around and could answer those questions if members of Congress wanted to ask. It’d be interesting to see what he had to say.”

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz suggests James Clapper be questioned by Congress on allegations he ran a program to shoot down and retrieve UAP Christopher Sharp: “There are some really, really alarming allegations surrounding James Clapper. The allegation is that him and Stephanie O’Sullivan, when he was Director of National Intelligence, ran a program to detect, shoot down, and retrieve UFOs.” Gaetz: “I wish I would’ve known that when I was asking him questions under oath. I would’ve found a way to make it relevant. I’m sure former Director Clapper is still around and could answer those questions if members of Congress wanted to ask. It’d be interesting to see what he had to say.”

UAP James

44,557 views • 23 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: EPSTEIN FILES EXPLOSION Rep. Nancy Mace says what she saw inside the DOJ review room raises serious questions — and the biggest one still hasn’t been answered: Why are the co-conspirators’ names STILL being redacted? According to Mace: • Members of Congress were individually tracked while reviewing files • Login activity and document access were monitored in real time • Key information about accomplices remains hidden from both lawmakers and the public She made one thing very clear: This case was not one man acting alone. It was a global sex-trafficking network. Thousands of victims. Decades of evidence. One person in prison. Mace says she is now preparing letters to the DOJ, CIA, and federal prosecutors to force disclosure — and vows to pursue the truth “if it’s the last thing” she does. The core question is becoming unavoidable: Who is still being protected — and why? Rep. Nancy Mace

🚨 BREAKING: EPSTEIN FILES EXPLOSION Rep. Nancy Mace says what she saw inside the DOJ review room raises serious questions — and the biggest one still hasn’t been answered: Why are the co-conspirators’ names STILL being redacted? According to Mace: • Members of Congress were individually tracked while reviewing files • Login activity and document access were monitored in real time • Key information about accomplices remains hidden from both lawmakers and the public She made one thing very clear: This case was not one man acting alone. It was a global sex-trafficking network. Thousands of victims. Decades of evidence. One person in prison. Mace says she is now preparing letters to the DOJ, CIA, and federal prosecutors to force disclosure — and vows to pursue the truth “if it’s the last thing” she does. The core question is becoming unavoidable: Who is still being protected — and why? Rep. Nancy Mace

Jim Ferguson

183,822 views • 5 months ago

WATCH: Rep. Nancy Mace just OBLITERATED Tim Walz in a lightning round beatdown during the sanctuary state hearing. “Are you still friends with school shooters?” This was savage. Nancy Mace: “Are you calling for ICE agents to be brought to a tribunal under the threat of death by comparing them to the Gestapo?” Walz tried to dodge: “Everyone is afforded due process.” Mace fired back: “What don’t you understand about yes or no?—Do you still want to abolish ICE? Yes or no.” Walz: “I never said I wanted to abolish ICE.” Mace: “Didn’t you march in a rally calling for ICE’s abolishment?” Walz: “Not that I recall, Congresswoman.” Then she went in on Kamala: “How do you rate Kamala Harris’s job as Border Czar? I want a number between 1 and 10.” Walz: “I wouldn’t have a way to measure that.” Mace: “Weren’t you her running mate for vice president? Was she a ten—or a one? Did you ever speak with Kamala about Joe Biden’s cognitive collapse?” Walz: “Not that I can recall, Congresswoman.” Mace: “You never once talked to her about why she was nominated instead of him?” Walz: “No, not that I can recall—I was more concerned with Donald Trump’s cognitive—” Then Mace dropped this: “Thank God he’s president and JD Vance is vice president and not you.” And she kept swinging: “Are you still friends with school shooters?” “Is bullying okay?” “Were you at Tiananmen Square?” Then came the final blow: “What is a woman? What is a woman is the question?” Walz: “I—I’m not sure I understand the question here—What do you want me to say?” Mace unleashed: “I want you to say that a woman like me is an adult human female. That men can’t become women!” “You guys are the party of violence. You’re the party erasing women. You don’t respect us.” “You’re a bigot. You’re a misogynist. You’re a sexist.” “Mr. Chairman, I yield back.”

WATCH: Rep. Nancy Mace just OBLITERATED Tim Walz in a lightning round beatdown during the sanctuary state hearing. “Are you still friends with school shooters?” This was savage. Nancy Mace: “Are you calling for ICE agents to be brought to a tribunal under the threat of death by comparing them to the Gestapo?” Walz tried to dodge: “Everyone is afforded due process.” Mace fired back: “What don’t you understand about yes or no?—Do you still want to abolish ICE? Yes or no.” Walz: “I never said I wanted to abolish ICE.” Mace: “Didn’t you march in a rally calling for ICE’s abolishment?” Walz: “Not that I recall, Congresswoman.” Then she went in on Kamala: “How do you rate Kamala Harris’s job as Border Czar? I want a number between 1 and 10.” Walz: “I wouldn’t have a way to measure that.” Mace: “Weren’t you her running mate for vice president? Was she a ten—or a one? Did you ever speak with Kamala about Joe Biden’s cognitive collapse?” Walz: “Not that I can recall, Congresswoman.” Mace: “You never once talked to her about why she was nominated instead of him?” Walz: “No, not that I can recall—I was more concerned with Donald Trump’s cognitive—” Then Mace dropped this: “Thank God he’s president and JD Vance is vice president and not you.” And she kept swinging: “Are you still friends with school shooters?” “Is bullying okay?” “Were you at Tiananmen Square?” Then came the final blow: “What is a woman? What is a woman is the question?” Walz: “I—I’m not sure I understand the question here—What do you want me to say?” Mace unleashed: “I want you to say that a woman like me is an adult human female. That men can’t become women!” “You guys are the party of violence. You’re the party erasing women. You don’t respect us.” “You’re a bigot. You’re a misogynist. You’re a sexist.” “Mr. Chairman, I yield back.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

636,998 views • 1 year ago

Do you have to answer the citizenship question at a checkpoint ? Yes, as a U.S. citizen at a checkpoint, you generally only have to answer questions to establish your identity and citizenship (like "Are you a U.S. citizen?") but you can refuse to answer further questions about your travel or background, though this might lead to further inspection or delays. You have the right to remain silent, but lying to a federal officer is a crime, so don't lie about your status. Remain Silent for Other Questions: You are not required to answer questions about your travel purpose, where you were born, or how you entered the country. Don't Lie: Lying to a federal agent is a serious offense. What to Say: If you don't want to answer, state clearly, "I am a U.S. citizen, and I choose to remain silent" or "Am I free to go?" Refusal May Lead to Delay: Refusing to answer extra questions might get you sent to secondary inspection, but you can't be denied entry solely for this. Key Distinction: Checkpoint vs. Border Checkpoint: Agents don't need suspicion to stop you but questions should be brief and relate to immigration status. Border: At the actual border (port of entry), they can ask more questions and require documents to establish entry rights. In Summary: You must confirm you're a citizen but you can invoke your right to silence for other inquiries, avoiding lies, to minimize potential delay.

Do you have to answer the citizenship question at a checkpoint ? Yes, as a U.S. citizen at a checkpoint, you generally only have to answer questions to establish your identity and citizenship (like "Are you a U.S. citizen?") but you can refuse to answer further questions about your travel or background, though this might lead to further inspection or delays. You have the right to remain silent, but lying to a federal officer is a crime, so don't lie about your status. Remain Silent for Other Questions: You are not required to answer questions about your travel purpose, where you were born, or how you entered the country. Don't Lie: Lying to a federal agent is a serious offense. What to Say: If you don't want to answer, state clearly, "I am a U.S. citizen, and I choose to remain silent" or "Am I free to go?" Refusal May Lead to Delay: Refusing to answer extra questions might get you sent to secondary inspection, but you can't be denied entry solely for this. Key Distinction: Checkpoint vs. Border Checkpoint: Agents don't need suspicion to stop you but questions should be brief and relate to immigration status. Border: At the actual border (port of entry), they can ask more questions and require documents to establish entry rights. In Summary: You must confirm you're a citizen but you can invoke your right to silence for other inquiries, avoiding lies, to minimize potential delay.

hernando arce

84,884 views • 7 months ago