正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

So 9 months ago I stashed away this reddit post regarding #lorifrantzve #erikakirk #charliekirk #tpusa - bc I didn’t have enough evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted I held onto it in screen shots. Then came Andrew Wilson showing some video not proving #erikakirk alibi on...

148,681 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

21 条评论

Queen City Kids™ 的头像
Queen City Kids™14 天前

@paleochristcon reddit is a lib haven, where they all go and pollute the entire board. if u dare leave an opinion, make sure its far left or it will be sent to reddit hell. Dont even bother with reddit anymore.

Clowntonio Brown 的头像
Clowntonio Brown14 天前

@paleochristcon lol what bullshit.

Kwoh 的头像
Kwoh14 天前

@paleochristcon I believe it. CK was gone all the time how could he be an active father. He sounds selfish. Take some time off

Samantha Therese 的头像
Samantha Therese14 天前

I normally empathize with the mother woman struggle of being a young mom, and that empathy of loneliness but a lot of those issues are economic……. The fact she doesn’t have that problem and I can clearly see Charlie was re prioritizing seeing how Erika resented that role, wasn’t good at that role, was allowing their house to become chaotic in that role I believe he wanted to dial back the careerism the consumerism as he stated. He was disenchanted with the movement and they were trying to re program him all summer with Erika there for all of it and said NOTHING about it even when Candace talked about the pressure he was under including the Hamptons summit. I have less empathy for lonely woman struggling maybe bored housewives, resentful wives, when they don’t voice that resentment and claim the complete opposite sentiment in public, on podcasts, on stage, at am fest, and church pulpit speeches; telling young women to start families asap! It’s such a blatant hypocrisy that I believe Charlie couldn’t stomach anymore knowing the reality of her resentment of that role. I also believe he truly wanted to be more present and prioritize his kids according to his note she read on Glen Beck. As a woman doing it all with out my daughters father spending a dime on Catholic high school, homecoming, cheer, dance, singing lessons, skiing and working full time bc I have to I just have less apathy for the shitty job she was clearly doing being a rich stay at home mom.

Kwoh 的头像
Kwoh14 天前

@paleochristcon Yeah i agree

Chad Thomas 的头像
Chad Thomas14 天前

@paleochristcon This is dumb. Charlie Kirk had a rare opportunity to make an impact in the world and set his family up with generational wealth. I’m sure he was gone more than he would have liked but sometimes thats the cost. On the flip side, most kids are raised at daycare and school.

Us vs Them 的头像
Us vs Them14 天前

@paleochristcon Wait until those kids are old enough to tell the story about their childhood. I’m sure there will be some stories about the way they were treated

LizzieZ 的头像
LizzieZ14 天前

@paleochristcon She's deeply unwell. I feel bad for the children.

Knight.Qrawler 的头像
Knight.Qrawler14 天前

@paleochristcon If you believe Reddit posts about Conservatives you're worse than retarded

Profaned Sun 的头像
Profaned Sun14 天前

@paleochristcon Just hire nannies! Like Lindsey Clancy did!

Kim Goodwin 的头像
Kim Goodwin14 天前

@paleochristcon And that was Charlie’s office not the condo. I’m sure the appearance of that place is much worse. This one is clearly staged.

Profaned Sun 的头像
Profaned Sun14 天前

@paleochristcon Charlie always said "God (Jesus) is number one"

Rebecca Nelson 的头像
Rebecca Nelson14 天前

@paleochristcon Notice she was sitting in Charlie's chair?? The chair that Erika claimed nobody had sat in since Charlie??

GhostofAtlanta 的头像
GhostofAtlanta14 天前

@paleochristcon It’s been my experience that religious people are some of the meanest mother fuckers around

Ashley Downard 的头像
Ashley Downard14 天前

@paleochristcon I feel so bad for those kids, she’s a freaking monster

Jeremiah Padgett 的头像
Jeremiah Padgett14 天前

@paleochristcon Umm the list she read on Glenn Beck sounds like he’s making a pro/cons list on staying with that demon.

Savz 的头像
Savz14 天前

@paleochristcon This is ridiculous.

BooRadley406 的头像
BooRadley40614 天前

@paleochristcon it’s so crazy to see all the deceitful and wrongful hate on Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk had a job and went home every day. Why is he a bad father for working and supporting his family? This person clearly doesn’t have any kids nor likes kids. A hater and probably an abortionist

Britt Keeley 的头像
Britt Keeley14 天前

@paleochristcon Another dumb lying cunt….they’re everywhere!!! Go made a sandwich and blow your man…if there is one stupid enough to be with you, at least then you’d be useful!

Savage Leroi 🇺🇸 的头像
Savage Leroi 🇺🇸14 天前

What high quality evidence. 😂 How do you take yourself seriously? A friend who was a caretaker in Charlie’s family. Which family? Post says that Charlie was not a good father. Now it’s true because of wall scribbling and few stray items in a picture. That’s what passes for evidence in that thing you call your brain. Ick.

MeMoSkiddly 的头像
MeMoSkiddly14 天前

@OttoBraun1976 @paleochristcon Interesting

相关视频

Yesterday, TPUSA dropped a bombshell: according to the organization, Candace Owens threatened to “burn down” TPUSA. That disclosure allows me to finally discuss something I was working on MONTHS AGO-something I deliberately refused to publish because, despite having an extremely credible source, I could not independently corroborate it. And that distinction matters. I don't publish an allegation simply because it fits a narrative I like. I could not publish, despite that I believe this, I could not get any corroboration. If I published 1/10 of what I get, I would be breaking new ridiculous stories every single day, like other grifters on this app. But my stories hold because I make sure they hold, I do the work. I want to be clear, I am not presenting this story as fact, but after the bombshell released yesterday, I think people are entitled to know some of the things I have learned about Candace Owens. Months ago, one source I consider exceptionally reliable told me that Candace Owens wanted to return to TPUSA --potentially as CEO or in another senior position that would give her substantial influence or control within the organization. I took the allegation seriously enough to investigate it. I sent the attached message to several people who had contacts or sources inside TPUSA, asking them to corroborate what I had been told. I cannot emphasize enough the credibility of the source. However, I could not get any corroboration, so I did not and could not publish, that is not how I work. That's what you're supposed to do when you actually give a damn about getting a story right. My source was not anonymous, and the source would have been in a position to know what the source claimed. But yesterday's revelation changes the evidentiary landscape. It does NOT independently prove every detail my source gave me. I'm not going to pretend it does. But it provides enough independent context that the information I received months ago deserves to be disclosed and scrutinized. And here's the rest of what my source alleged: I was told that Candace wanted back into TPUSA leadership and that when it became apparent Erika Kirk was NOT going to bring her back-and instead intended to distance herself and the organization from Owens-the relationship deteriorated dramatically. Look at the timeline. In the beginning, Candace was publicly supportive of Erika and TPUSA. She accepted that Tyler Robinson was the killer. There wasn't some sprawling conspiracy involving TPUSA. There wasn't a campaign portraying the organization and people surrounding Charlie as suspicious characters in their own friend's murder. Candace even said Erica gave on of the most consequential speeches in American History. Then something changed. According to my source, the rejection came first. The war came afterward. My source's allegation was that once Owens realized there would be no triumphant return to TPUSA and no position of influence waiting for her, she turned against the organization. Now TPUSA itself alleges that Owens threatened to “burn down” the organization. That does not automatically prove my source's entire account. But it sure as hell makes the information I was given months ago considerably more relevant. And there is another important piece of evidence here: my contemporaneous messages. I didn't manufacture this source story yesterday after TPUSA made its allegation. I was privately attempting to corroborate it MONTHS AGO. The messages exist. They establish that this information was in my possession long before yesterday's disclosure. This is why I am releasing them now. People can examine the timeline and evidence and draw their own conclusions. But here's the difference between investigation and grifting: I had a story that would have generated enormous attention months ago, and I SAT ON IT because I couldn't corroborate it. I didn't turn one source into three. I didn't turn suspicion into evidence. I didn't turn an allegation into a fact. I kept digging. Now an organization directly involved in this dispute has publicly made an allegation that materially overlaps with the behavior my source described months ago. That doesn't close the case. It means the story I refused to publish is now a story worth examining. And on top of the other stories I am working on, I intend on pursuing this, HARDER.

MR. Xclusive

14,560 次观看 • 1 个月前