Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

So I've made a youtube channel to share tutorials that don't quite fit on my Artstation, and thought I'd share. You're doing Surface Imperfections Wrong!

88,779 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

18 Comments

Gleb Alexandrov's profile picture
Gleb Alexandrov10 months ago

Love your art, so it's such a great news! Looking forward to your upcoming youtube videos.

Nathan's profile picture
Nathan10 months ago

I have no use for this but it's so fascinating. Subbed!

Prismal's profile picture
Prismal10 months ago

Thanks so much dude!

Jon Noorlander's profile picture
Jon Noorlander10 months ago

Like this! Done materials wrong for 20 years! Haha

Matt Hayashi's profile picture
Matt Hayashi10 months ago

Looking forward to giving this a proper watch! (Also the design/motion graphic stuff through the tutorial is really good too ha)

Prismal's profile picture
Prismal10 months ago

Thank you! These take so long, hope they make explanations clearer

Emad Ameri's profile picture
Emad Ameri10 months ago

How did we not know about this? 😩 Loved the video on yt by the way. Appreciate you sharing your knowledge ❤️

𝕞𝕒𝕩𝕧𝕠𝕝𝕥𝕒𝕣's profile picture
𝕞𝕒𝕩𝕧𝕠𝕝𝕥𝕒𝕣10 months ago

Curious about the best way to do this in Blender.

Prismal's profile picture
Prismal10 months ago

I'm barely scratching the surface of Blender from afar at the moment, but a bunch of friends have converted their setups with a Mix Shader.

koko ze's profile picture
koko ze10 months ago

@maxvoltar That might be wrong :/ This doesn't add a shader on top of another one but just switches one for the other. The only way to have oily smudges on a surface is to use the "Coat" section in the principled shader. So I belive that Blender has a 1 layer limit in that regard.

Prismal's profile picture
Prismal10 months ago

@maxvoltar There are no hierarchies in material layering, you are showing a different shader at X opacity on a surface, it isn't actually interprating any depth between the two materials. Here 2 renders with inverted hierarchies, identical results. VrayBlend is 10 stacked Mix Shaders.

koko ze's profile picture
koko ze10 months ago

@maxvoltar Sorry I think I ment something different I guess. How do you tackle a material that has a slimy bugger on it all inside of a shader with single geometry? If I do it the mixing way then I have the problem that I can see behind the object since I need to enable transmission.

Prismal's profile picture
Prismal10 months ago

@maxvoltar Since MTL Layering doesn't actually simulate thickness, your slimy shader should be a "slimed version" of your underneath surface. If you actually make a refractive slime on an opaque surface, you'll see through, so opaque surfaces must have a "slimed opaque" shader instead.

Prismal's profile picture
Prismal10 months ago

@maxvoltar We do an in-between that is a "slimed up version" of the current surface you are applying it to. In the tutorial none of the materials applied to opaque surfaces are refractive! Always Opaque on Opaque, Refractive on Refractive.

SubWay's profile picture
SubWay10 months ago

Can we use this for Blender?

Alfonso's profile picture
Alfonso10 months ago

it's all about observation, thanks for making these and sharing the details. great work !

De Ridder's profile picture
De Ridder10 months ago

Sharp observations!

DYLAN V's profile picture
DYLAN V10 months ago

Hello, I have a question regarding your solution: since the coat acts on top of the roughness, can we use the coating to achieve the same result?

Related Videos