Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

So long, CloudSat. 🛰️☁️ Since 2006, the satellite’s powerful radar provided never-before-seen details of clouds and helped advance global weather and climate predictions. The NASA mission has now ended its operations, but it leaves a lasting impact.

41,414 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

3 Kommentare

Profilbild von Joseph F Truncale
Joseph F Truncalevor 2 Jahren

@NASA Out of propellant?

Profilbild von Sudipta Bandopadhya
Sudipta Bandopadhyavor 2 Jahren

@NASA 👍

Profilbild von 具子 河田
具子 河田vor 2 Jahren

@NASA 闇が晴れない?🙁確かに❗️

Ähnliche Videos

Al Gore said we had 10 years to save the planet… 19 years ago. Let’s check the scoreboard on his apocalyptic 2006 predictions. 1/ In 2006, Al Gore stood on his iconic ladder and gave a masterclass in climate fearmongering. He claimed Greenland & Antarctica were disintegrating, that "maps of the world will have to be redrawn," and showed graphics of major cities flooding. The media treated it as gospel. 2/ So, what’s happened since his dire warning? Greenland Ice Mass: - Gore’s claim: Imminent breakup and melt, causing catastrophic sea level rise. - The Reality: While Greenland has lost ice, it's a far cry from "maps being redrawn." - From 1992-2023, Greenland contributed ~13.7 mm to sea level rise. That's about half an inch over 31 years. 3/ Sea Level Rise: - Gore’s implication: Feet of sea level rise, drowning Florida, Shanghai, and the Netherlands. - The Reality: The global average sea level has risen at a steady, linear rate of about 3.4 mm per year for decades. No alarming acceleration. Since 2006, it's risen about 2.3 inches total. 4/ Let's be clear: A 2-3 inch rise over 18 years is a concern for long-term planning, but it is not the "redraw the world maps" catastrophe Gore sold to the public. His graphics were science-fiction, not science. 5/ The real tragedy of Gore’s doom-peddling? It created a generation of climate policy based on panic, not pragmatism. It shut down scientific debate and funneled trillions into inefficient solutions based on failed models. When the predictions fail so spectacularly, you have to question the motive. 6/ The climate is complex, and our understanding evolves. But the "settled science" of 2006, used to justify a radical restructuring of the global economy, was wildly, demonstrably wrong. It’s not denial to point out when a prophecy fails. It’s accountability. What's your take?

Camus

26,216 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten