正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

So we're supposed to forget everything just because the script has changed? The same people who dismissed the Gen Z push for better governance, cheered on the broad-based arrangement, and helped create today's political confusion now want to rebrand themselves as champions of wananchi. That's quite a transformation. As... show more

Hon. Peter Salasya

79,020 subscribers

13,738 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Justin Verlander on the rash of pithcer injuries: "...I think the game has changed a lot, it would be easiest to blame the pitch clock, in reality everything has a little bit of influence, the biggest thing is the style of pitching has changed so much, everyone is throwing as hard as they possibly can and spinning the ball as hard as they possibly can...it's a double-edged sword...I don't have all the answers...when the balls started to change back in 2016 and started flying out...it changed how I had to approach pitching...I want(ed) swing and miss...I don't how we rewind the clock...the trickle-down permeates all the way to little league...I just hope that we don't wait too long...it's a pandemic and it's going to take years to work itself out..."

Justin Verlander on the rash of pithcer injuries: "...I think the game has changed a lot, it would be easiest to blame the pitch clock, in reality everything has a little bit of influence, the biggest thing is the style of pitching has changed so much, everyone is throwing as hard as they possibly can and spinning the ball as hard as they possibly can...it's a double-edged sword...I don't have all the answers...when the balls started to change back in 2016 and started flying out...it changed how I had to approach pitching...I want(ed) swing and miss...I don't how we rewind the clock...the trickle-down permeates all the way to little league...I just hope that we don't wait too long...it's a pandemic and it's going to take years to work itself out..."

Ari Alexander

1,894,095 次观看 • 2 年前

#WATCH | Delhi | On CJP protest, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "When a non-violent protest is taking place, what is the reason for a lathi-charge? Lathi charge is not an act of non-violence. It is an act of violence. I don't understand the logic of this. Similarly here in Parliament, everyone knows these are burning issues across the country. It would be logical to have a discussion on them. Parliament is supposed to be the place where we can ventilate the voice of the people, the concerns of the people. Once we do that, we all know the government has a majority. As the old saying goes, the Opposition must have its say because the government will have its way. They have the majority. But at least let parliament be a forum where these concerns can be heard, can be truly ventilated and voiced, where various people can represent the views of their constituents. Then the government can disagree. But right now, just refusing a discussion is what has led to today's disruption because the opposition wanted these issues up there, wanted an opportunity to talk about them on the floor of the house. If Parliament is not for raising these issues, then honestly, what is it for? I mean, it can't just be a sort of notice board for the government to announce its bills and get them passed with a rubber stamp. That's not what Parliament is all about. It should be a forum where all these views can be heard, discussed, debated as necessary and then passed. The Prime Minister has sought cooperation from the opposition. We'll cooperate if they cooperate. The idea should be that there should be mutual cooperation. Let them permit certain discussions. This has got to be give and take. That's the way Parliament is supposed to function."

#WATCH | Delhi | On CJP protest, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "When a non-violent protest is taking place, what is the reason for a lathi-charge? Lathi charge is not an act of non-violence. It is an act of violence. I don't understand the logic of this. Similarly here in Parliament, everyone knows these are burning issues across the country. It would be logical to have a discussion on them. Parliament is supposed to be the place where we can ventilate the voice of the people, the concerns of the people. Once we do that, we all know the government has a majority. As the old saying goes, the Opposition must have its say because the government will have its way. They have the majority. But at least let parliament be a forum where these concerns can be heard, can be truly ventilated and voiced, where various people can represent the views of their constituents. Then the government can disagree. But right now, just refusing a discussion is what has led to today's disruption because the opposition wanted these issues up there, wanted an opportunity to talk about them on the floor of the house. If Parliament is not for raising these issues, then honestly, what is it for? I mean, it can't just be a sort of notice board for the government to announce its bills and get them passed with a rubber stamp. That's not what Parliament is all about. It should be a forum where all these views can be heard, discussed, debated as necessary and then passed. The Prime Minister has sought cooperation from the opposition. We'll cooperate if they cooperate. The idea should be that there should be mutual cooperation. Let them permit certain discussions. This has got to be give and take. That's the way Parliament is supposed to function."

ANI

317,101 次观看 • 20 天前

Elon Musk on Boring Company: "It did say for the longest time that people want to build tunnels, and then everyone thought I was joking, and then I was like, "Fine, we'll just create a company, the Boring Company, to build tunnels, because this is an obvious way to reduce traffic to zero by going 3d with your transport system, just as we go 3d with the buildings. I encourage other people to start tunneling companies, because Boring Company - the only one, as far as I can tell, that's taking this serious - boring to be the only boring company, right? Yeah, honestly, there's like a lot of opportunity in tunnels."

Elon Musk on Boring Company: "It did say for the longest time that people want to build tunnels, and then everyone thought I was joking, and then I was like, "Fine, we'll just create a company, the Boring Company, to build tunnels, because this is an obvious way to reduce traffic to zero by going 3d with your transport system, just as we go 3d with the buildings. I encourage other people to start tunneling companies, because Boring Company - the only one, as far as I can tell, that's taking this serious - boring to be the only boring company, right? Yeah, honestly, there's like a lot of opportunity in tunnels."

DogeDesigner

21,975 次观看 • 2 个月前

⚠️ AI’S DOUBLE‑EDGED FUTURE: PROMISE AND DANGERS Wynton Hall: “I think it's really the fact that people still think it's just a tool. It is a tool, but it's also political power. And increasingly, it's going to be the power to be able to indoctrinate or educate our children to erase or create jobs. And as we're seeing right now in Iran and with the Maduro raid in Venezuela, it is going to determine who comes home alive and dead on a battlefield as the AI warfare race continues.” Grant Stinchfield

⚠️ AI’S DOUBLE‑EDGED FUTURE: PROMISE AND DANGERS Wynton Hall: “I think it's really the fact that people still think it's just a tool. It is a tool, but it's also political power. And increasingly, it's going to be the power to be able to indoctrinate or educate our children to erase or create jobs. And as we're seeing right now in Iran and with the Maduro raid in Venezuela, it is going to determine who comes home alive and dead on a battlefield as the AI warfare race continues.” Grant Stinchfield

Real America's Voice (RAV)

12,050 次观看 • 4 个月前

Vivek Ramaswamy message to YouTube is actually a much more important message about Free Speech “This is a message for the leadership of YouTube — My understanding is in the last 24 hours, you locked the accounts and shut down the accounts of two guys, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. They have big followings on the American right. I think it's better if you just unlock those accounts and let the guys be heard. —The reason I'm asking you to do it is that censorship isn't good for America. It's antithetical to our culture, and we're the country on God's green Earth where we're able to talk to each other in the open I want to credit YouTube and Google and your parent company and so much of your competitors in Silicon Valley for creating the first instance of the free and open internet with search engines. It's a beautiful thing for democratizing speech. But I think we take a step in the wrong direction when we choke those same technologies that allow us to access open debate and open ideas. It breeds discontent. It breeds frustration. It actually breeds mistrust. If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream. And if you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down. So I think pre- free speech is a precondition for peace. It's a precondition for the scientific method. It's a precondition for our shared unity, our shared national identity as Americans. — It's the question of whether this is good or bad for America, and I think we live in a moment right now where when we tell people, whether it's the government or even a powerful company, when you tell people that because of who you are, you deserve not to be heard, I think that actually divides us. Even if it's done with the best of intentions of thinking it brings most of the rest of the country together, in the long run, it actually throws kerosene on the very flame you were trying to, to quash. — It's not even about the content. It's about the principle. I'd ask you to restore the accounts of those guys and believe me, it will be a down payment on beginning to reunite this country, a project on which we have yet a very long way to go. Thanks a lot for considering.”

Vivek Ramaswamy message to YouTube is actually a much more important message about Free Speech “This is a message for the leadership of YouTube — My understanding is in the last 24 hours, you locked the accounts and shut down the accounts of two guys, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. They have big followings on the American right. I think it's better if you just unlock those accounts and let the guys be heard. —The reason I'm asking you to do it is that censorship isn't good for America. It's antithetical to our culture, and we're the country on God's green Earth where we're able to talk to each other in the open I want to credit YouTube and Google and your parent company and so much of your competitors in Silicon Valley for creating the first instance of the free and open internet with search engines. It's a beautiful thing for democratizing speech. But I think we take a step in the wrong direction when we choke those same technologies that allow us to access open debate and open ideas. It breeds discontent. It breeds frustration. It actually breeds mistrust. If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream. And if you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down. So I think pre- free speech is a precondition for peace. It's a precondition for the scientific method. It's a precondition for our shared unity, our shared national identity as Americans. — It's the question of whether this is good or bad for America, and I think we live in a moment right now where when we tell people, whether it's the government or even a powerful company, when you tell people that because of who you are, you deserve not to be heard, I think that actually divides us. Even if it's done with the best of intentions of thinking it brings most of the rest of the country together, in the long run, it actually throws kerosene on the very flame you were trying to, to quash. — It's not even about the content. It's about the principle. I'd ask you to restore the accounts of those guys and believe me, it will be a down payment on beginning to reunite this country, a project on which we have yet a very long way to go. Thanks a lot for considering.”

Wall Street Apes

79,456 次观看 • 10 个月前

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Anatoli Kopadze

91,518 次观看 • 1 个月前

VIDEO | Delhi: "How is it possible that dead people are in the draft list and living people are on the deleted list? How can a dead person be on a draft list? It can only happen because the BLOs were signing the form themselves...In just two districts of Bihar - Darbhanga and Kaimur, the BLO has marked “not recommended” for 10 to 12%. If we average this for the rest of Bihar, it means 80 lakh people will be marked “not recommended” and subjected to an arbitrary verification. So based on all of this, we can go on till the cows come home. But can I tell you, based on just these five points the CEC mentioned yesterday, this is ludicrous. It is not the job of the Chief Election Commissioners to attack the opposition. Your job, sir, is to go into great detail on the valid queries raised by the opposition", said TMC's Mahua Moitra addressing the INDIA bloc press conference at the Constitution Club.

VIDEO | Delhi: "How is it possible that dead people are in the draft list and living people are on the deleted list? How can a dead person be on a draft list? It can only happen because the BLOs were signing the form themselves...In just two districts of Bihar - Darbhanga and Kaimur, the BLO has marked “not recommended” for 10 to 12%. If we average this for the rest of Bihar, it means 80 lakh people will be marked “not recommended” and subjected to an arbitrary verification. So based on all of this, we can go on till the cows come home. But can I tell you, based on just these five points the CEC mentioned yesterday, this is ludicrous. It is not the job of the Chief Election Commissioners to attack the opposition. Your job, sir, is to go into great detail on the valid queries raised by the opposition", said TMC's Mahua Moitra addressing the INDIA bloc press conference at the Constitution Club.

Press Trust of India

28,325 次观看 • 11 个月前

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

ELON CLIPS

5,539,295 次观看 • 1 年前

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

Zack Snyder Film

22,225 次观看 • 6 个月前

Tulip King explains why Bitcoin is destined to hit $1,000,000 “It's actually so deeply important to the species that we have a fair and equitable money that is as hard and resistant and true as possible” “That doesn't ever change the rules. So we're all playing the same game no matter where you are in the world, no matter who you are” “You still have to believe that it's actually so deeply important for society and humanity and it's going to make the world so much of a better place” “How could it not go to $1M and then $10M and then $100M and eventually pick your line where one BTC equals one BTC” “As bearish as I am and as much as I didn't want to sit through this price action because I'm having just a trading hot streak, it's destiny” “It's going to go to $1,000,000 because it is actually just still better than everything else ever invented” “Thank God for Satoshi”

Tulip King explains why Bitcoin is destined to hit $1,000,000 “It's actually so deeply important to the species that we have a fair and equitable money that is as hard and resistant and true as possible” “That doesn't ever change the rules. So we're all playing the same game no matter where you are in the world, no matter who you are” “You still have to believe that it's actually so deeply important for society and humanity and it's going to make the world so much of a better place” “How could it not go to $1M and then $10M and then $100M and eventually pick your line where one BTC equals one BTC” “As bearish as I am and as much as I didn't want to sit through this price action because I'm having just a trading hot streak, it's destiny” “It's going to go to $1,000,000 because it is actually just still better than everything else ever invented” “Thank God for Satoshi”

Jack

25,065 次观看 • 2 个月前

Dr. Norman G. Finkelstein on the so-called "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" aid sites: "How do they distribute the food? You know how they distribute it? They throw it on the floor and then people are supposed to run for it, to reduce them to rats. Whenever I read about that, it reminds me in the concentration camps, the food they put in the giant vat, it's almost all water. I'm referring to World War II now. It's almost all water, but there are few vegetables, a few vegetables in that vat of soup. And so, what can you imagine? the people who are lining up, they're pushing each other. They're shoving each other because you have to get to the head of the line or it's just water. And that's what they do to the people of Gaza, reducing them to scurrying rats. And then as they go for the food, the Israelis because they're scared, they're afraid, they start shooting at the people, killing them as they scramble and scurry for the food." Full talk:

Dr. Norman G. Finkelstein on the so-called "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" aid sites: "How do they distribute the food? You know how they distribute it? They throw it on the floor and then people are supposed to run for it, to reduce them to rats. Whenever I read about that, it reminds me in the concentration camps, the food they put in the giant vat, it's almost all water. I'm referring to World War II now. It's almost all water, but there are few vegetables, a few vegetables in that vat of soup. And so, what can you imagine? the people who are lining up, they're pushing each other. They're shoving each other because you have to get to the head of the line or it's just water. And that's what they do to the people of Gaza, reducing them to scurrying rats. And then as they go for the food, the Israelis because they're scared, they're afraid, they start shooting at the people, killing them as they scramble and scurry for the food." Full talk:

Zachary Foster

374,852 次观看 • 11 个月前

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Acyn

343,187 次观看 • 1 年前

When you take office, you swear to uphold the Constitution. As your time runs out, some look for ways around it — or try to tear it apart just to hold on to power. But there's a time for everything: a time to serve the people, and a time to hand back the power they entrusted to you. Article 64 of our Constitution doesn't just give every Congolese citizen the right to stand against any seizure or exercise of power that violates the law — it makes it a duty. I'm exercising that duty. And I stand by it. I've always said it, and I'll say it again: when you come for the Constitution, you come for the people. And the Congolese people will not stand for it.

When you take office, you swear to uphold the Constitution. As your time runs out, some look for ways around it — or try to tear it apart just to hold on to power. But there's a time for everything: a time to serve the people, and a time to hand back the power they entrusted to you. Article 64 of our Constitution doesn't just give every Congolese citizen the right to stand against any seizure or exercise of power that violates the law — it makes it a duty. I'm exercising that duty. And I stand by it. I've always said it, and I'll say it again: when you come for the Constitution, you come for the people. And the Congolese people will not stand for it.

Moise Katumbi

48,210 次观看 • 4 个月前

This week, I was chatting to Chris Martenson, the founder of Peak Prosperity ( about the global warming hoax meet the carbon credit hoax. They've said for years they want people to stop flying, they want them in smart cities, they want them to stop using oil powered cars, things like that. Except, people weren't falling for it, especially as it's not getting hotter anywhere, in many places it's actually getting cooler. And, as soon as they needed power for #datacenters the whole #climate story just went away. Right? So I think this is what their next plan is... 'let's just make it so the flock doesn't have oil and food and then we'll get to our goals'. That's basically where we're now.

This week, I was chatting to Chris Martenson, the founder of Peak Prosperity ( about the global warming hoax meet the carbon credit hoax. They've said for years they want people to stop flying, they want them in smart cities, they want them to stop using oil powered cars, things like that. Except, people weren't falling for it, especially as it's not getting hotter anywhere, in many places it's actually getting cooler. And, as soon as they needed power for #datacenters the whole #climate story just went away. Right? So I think this is what their next plan is... 'let's just make it so the flock doesn't have oil and food and then we'll get to our goals'. That's basically where we're now.

The Dollar Vigilante

17,736 次观看 • 1 个月前

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

176,262 次观看 • 20 天前

JUST IN: United States Senator for Missouri, Eric Schmitt (Eric Schmitt) EXPLODES, says, "You want to know why (Trump) is rising in the polls? Because the American people understand the injustice that's happening, and they don't want to see their country turn into a banana republic." WATCH "As a legal matter, this case is a total joke in a broader sense. You want to talk about threats to democracy? That's what this is across the street, the idea that the Democrats not only try to keep him off the ballot, Donald Trump, but now throw him in jail for the rest of his life because they know he's going to win in November, and the only way they think they can get after it is this unprecedented lawfare. We have never, ladies and gentlemen, we've never seen anything like this in this country. So I know this can kind of be normalized as you've been covering it. This is outrageous. If this were happening in any other country, our State Department would be warning people not to go to that country because it's a banana republic. And more broadly speaking, let me just say this from a political perspective. From a political perspective, the American people see what's happening. This has added jet fuel to his campaign. You want to know why he's rising in the polls? Because the American people understand the injustice that's happening, and they don't want to see their country turn into a banana republic." - Eric Schmitt

JUST IN: United States Senator for Missouri, Eric Schmitt (Eric Schmitt) EXPLODES, says, "You want to know why (Trump) is rising in the polls? Because the American people understand the injustice that's happening, and they don't want to see their country turn into a banana republic." WATCH "As a legal matter, this case is a total joke in a broader sense. You want to talk about threats to democracy? That's what this is across the street, the idea that the Democrats not only try to keep him off the ballot, Donald Trump, but now throw him in jail for the rest of his life because they know he's going to win in November, and the only way they think they can get after it is this unprecedented lawfare. We have never, ladies and gentlemen, we've never seen anything like this in this country. So I know this can kind of be normalized as you've been covering it. This is outrageous. If this were happening in any other country, our State Department would be warning people not to go to that country because it's a banana republic. And more broadly speaking, let me just say this from a political perspective. From a political perspective, the American people see what's happening. This has added jet fuel to his campaign. You want to know why he's rising in the polls? Because the American people understand the injustice that's happening, and they don't want to see their country turn into a banana republic." - Eric Schmitt

Simon Ateba

334,668 次观看 • 2 年前

Great question from Bret Baier to Matthew Tkachuk on whether it was better to win two Stanley Cups or the Olympic gold medal... “Oh, that’s — it’s so hard. It’s — it’s been crazier, to be honest with you, because the hundreds of millions of people back here in the United States, like, we felt the support. Whether you liked hockey or not, it united everybody and cheered for one team. And it was most special team to ever be part of and it meant the world for me to be on this team and it meant the world for me to represent this country and I don’t know if I’ll ever have an experience that will replicate the last few weeks and what this has meant to — I mean, our lives have changed forever to be completely honest. Even being over here in the U.S. for two days, it’s been absolutely insane and it’s hard for me to wrap my head around, but the impact this has had on Americans across the country, it’s the most special thing you could ever imagine.”

Great question from Bret Baier to Matthew Tkachuk on whether it was better to win two Stanley Cups or the Olympic gold medal... “Oh, that’s — it’s so hard. It’s — it’s been crazier, to be honest with you, because the hundreds of millions of people back here in the United States, like, we felt the support. Whether you liked hockey or not, it united everybody and cheered for one team. And it was most special team to ever be part of and it meant the world for me to be on this team and it meant the world for me to represent this country and I don’t know if I’ll ever have an experience that will replicate the last few weeks and what this has meant to — I mean, our lives have changed forever to be completely honest. Even being over here in the U.S. for two days, it’s been absolutely insane and it’s hard for me to wrap my head around, but the impact this has had on Americans across the country, it’s the most special thing you could ever imagine.”

Curtis Houck

554,747 次观看 • 5 个月前

The Circle (2000, Panahi)/ Iran "Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date." --- Jafar Panahi Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: The subject matter of 'The Circle' (2000) is controversial. You mentioned that the film is still banned in Iran. In fact, when I was watching the film, I realized that through the characters, there’s a lot of fear about the system, the establishment, the police. The women can’t smoke; they have to wear the chador; they seem to want to hide every time. This is all very clear from watching the film. Did you deliberately want to make a statement about the political situation in Iran? Panahi: I have to tell you again that I’m not a political person. I don’t like political movies. But I take every opportunity to comment on the social issues. I talk about the current issues. To me it’s not important what is the reason for what has happened. Whether it’s political reasons or geographical reasons: these are not important—but the condition, the social issues. It is important to me to talk about the plight of humanity at that time. I don’t want to give a political view, or start a political war. I think that the artist should rise above this. Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date. So it doesn’t really serve a political purpose. Then it can be everlasting, for always, and it could be for anywhere. But I know that politically, with the film authorities, with any kind of film that has some political background in it, they would take issue with it. And for this reason, that is what the problem is. Interviewer: Still, your film makes a very strong statement about the problems that women face in Iran. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. Interviewer: So that is humanitarian, of course, but it’s also political. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. It has the elements. It all depends on how you look at it. If a person has only political views, then he will only see the political. But if you are a poet or an artist, then you see other things as well in the movie. If you are a socialist, you see political or economic or whatever different points of view. You mustn’t look at a film with only one point of view. If you want to see 'The Circle' (2000) as political, then it is one of the most political movies in Iran. By political, I mean partisan politics. But even the police, I didn’t want to show them as bad. In the first instance, you are afraid of the police. Because you are looking at them from the point of view of someone who is now in prison. And normally you see him in a long shot, but when they come nearer and you see them in a medium shot, you can see their human faces. Then it comes down to, “Do you need any help?” But he goes back again and becomes frightening. If I were being political, then I would always show the police as dangerous or bad persons." (Jafar Panahi's interview with Stephen Teo, Senses of Cinema, 2001)

The Circle (2000, Panahi)/ Iran "Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date." --- Jafar Panahi Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: The subject matter of 'The Circle' (2000) is controversial. You mentioned that the film is still banned in Iran. In fact, when I was watching the film, I realized that through the characters, there’s a lot of fear about the system, the establishment, the police. The women can’t smoke; they have to wear the chador; they seem to want to hide every time. This is all very clear from watching the film. Did you deliberately want to make a statement about the political situation in Iran? Panahi: I have to tell you again that I’m not a political person. I don’t like political movies. But I take every opportunity to comment on the social issues. I talk about the current issues. To me it’s not important what is the reason for what has happened. Whether it’s political reasons or geographical reasons: these are not important—but the condition, the social issues. It is important to me to talk about the plight of humanity at that time. I don’t want to give a political view, or start a political war. I think that the artist should rise above this. Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date. So it doesn’t really serve a political purpose. Then it can be everlasting, for always, and it could be for anywhere. But I know that politically, with the film authorities, with any kind of film that has some political background in it, they would take issue with it. And for this reason, that is what the problem is. Interviewer: Still, your film makes a very strong statement about the problems that women face in Iran. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. Interviewer: So that is humanitarian, of course, but it’s also political. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. It has the elements. It all depends on how you look at it. If a person has only political views, then he will only see the political. But if you are a poet or an artist, then you see other things as well in the movie. If you are a socialist, you see political or economic or whatever different points of view. You mustn’t look at a film with only one point of view. If you want to see 'The Circle' (2000) as political, then it is one of the most political movies in Iran. By political, I mean partisan politics. But even the police, I didn’t want to show them as bad. In the first instance, you are afraid of the police. Because you are looking at them from the point of view of someone who is now in prison. And normally you see him in a long shot, but when they come nearer and you see them in a medium shot, you can see their human faces. Then it comes down to, “Do you need any help?” But he goes back again and becomes frightening. If I were being political, then I would always show the police as dangerous or bad persons." (Jafar Panahi's interview with Stephen Teo, Senses of Cinema, 2001)

DepressedBergman

43,871 次观看 • 6 个月前

Trump says that the Iranians gave him a generous gift. For all the good he has done for their country: - Actually, it's wonderful. They presented us with a gift. It arrived just today. It's very large, and it costs a lot of money. I won't talk about it, but I'll just say that it's a significant gift. And they presented it to us. What they told me personally is that we're now dealing with the "right people". No, it's not related to the nuclear issue, but rather to the oil and gas sector. It was very kind of them. And it showed me that we're dealing with the right people.

Trump says that the Iranians gave him a generous gift. For all the good he has done for their country: - Actually, it's wonderful. They presented us with a gift. It arrived just today. It's very large, and it costs a lot of money. I won't talk about it, but I'll just say that it's a significant gift. And they presented it to us. What they told me personally is that we're now dealing with the "right people". No, it's not related to the nuclear issue, but rather to the oil and gas sector. It was very kind of them. And it showed me that we're dealing with the right people.

S p r i n t e r

18,956 次观看 • 4 个月前