Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Solar tiles (also called shingles) are a technological evolution that mimics the appearance of regular asphalt shingles on your roof. They protect your roof and have the same durability and flexibility as ordinary shingles, while also generating electricity for your home using the sun’s solar energy. The future is...

83,855 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Juma T's profile picture
Juma T2 years ago

This is excellent. What's the price range for say 1200watts?

Powerhouse Systems Ltd's profile picture
Powerhouse Systems Ltd2 years ago

The technology is yet to properly kick off in Kenya. Some guys have tried the manufacture of the same but found it to be expensive. We await for the technology to improve so that efficiency in production increases..

Edward Simiyu's profile picture
Edward Simiyu2 years ago

Wow! The future is here already! Great technology for sure! @MaureenKamusii2 @jmollel @sokosolar @Ashem30 @CollinsBriche

Th€King™'s profile picture
Th€King™2 years ago

This is powerful

Ken K's profile picture
Ken K2 years ago

How do you sell them, a piece or per dozen? Can one use them on a just a section of the roof instead of the entire roof?

Powerhouse Systems Ltd's profile picture
Powerhouse Systems Ltd2 years ago

Evidently, yes

Dennis Muturi H M 🇰🇪🇶🇦's profile picture
Dennis Muturi H M 🇰🇪🇶🇦2 years ago

Hii inaweza sana. Ifike market haraka .

Keith ANDERE's profile picture
Keith ANDERE2 years ago

This is awesome 👏

Gee's profile picture
Gee2 years ago

Awesome 👌 👏

TechSparks's profile picture
TechSparks2 years ago

Awesome 💯

Related Videos

A CDC Whistleblower's Story: How a Vaccine "Success" Masked a Public Health Crisis For 8 years, Dr. Gary Goldman was a top epidemiologist on the CDC's Varicella (chickenpox) Active Surveillance Project. His job was to track the vaccine's impact. What he discovered was a pattern of scientific suppression that prioritized a "winning narrative" over public health. Here's the breakdown: 1. The "Success" Story Was Misleading. The CDC was thrilled to publish Dr. Goldman's studies showing an 80% drop in chickenpox cases. What they ignored was his crucial context: the decline began at the PEAK of chickenpox's natural 3-5 year cycle. The initial drop was largely a natural phenomenon, not solely the vaccine's achievement. 2. The Critical Omission: Ignoring Shingles. The same virus that causes chickenpox (VZV) later reactivates as shingles (herpes zoster). From the start, the project REFUSED to surveil shingles, despite FDA warnings. This was a catastrophic oversight. Why? Because natural chickenpox circulation in children provides "exogenous boosting" to adults who had chickenpox, reinforcing their immunity and preventing shingles. Remove chickenpox via mass vaccination, and you remove this protective boost. 3. The Inconvenient Truth Emerges. Dr. Goldman fought to start shingles surveillance in 2000. The results were immediate and alarming: • Shingles rates in children with prior chickenpox infection skyrocketed, approaching the high rates seen in adults. • Adults also showed a statistically significant increase in shingles. A 20-25% increase in adult shingles would offset EVERY benefit from eliminating chickenpox hospitalizations and deaths. The program was creating a new, more severe public health problem. 4. The CDC's Playbook: Suppress and Obfuscate. Instead of acting, the CDC: • Ignored Internal Data: Downplayed Dr. Goldman's alarming, ascertainment-corrected findings. • Published a Flawed Study: Cited a separate study in a non-vaccinated area (which showed no shingles increase) to claim "mixed results," muddying the waters. • Systematically Under-Reported Cases: The CDC published shingles rates that were NOT corrected for under-reporting. Dr. Goldman's capture-recapture methods proved the CDC's published rates reflected only HALF the true number of cases, creating a falsely low baseline. 5. The Revolving Door. The final, stark conflict of interest? Dr. Julie Gerberding, who served as CDC Director from 2002-2009, overseeing this program, later resigned to become the President of Merck's Vaccine Division—the manufacturer of the Varicella vaccine. The conclusion is inescapable. The CDC actively suppressed damaging data on the varicella vaccine's link to a shingles epidemic to protect a "successful" program's image. The scientific process was compromised, and the public has been left with the consequences. This is not an anti-vaccine story. It is a pro-transparency story. It reveals how institutional science can fail when the pressure to prove success overrides the duty to pursue the whole truth.

Camus

52,989 views • 9 months ago