Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Some people do not kill with their own hands. They help make it happen by pushing wars that enrich defense contractors and leave other people to pay in blood. When conflict becomes a business model, the people who sell it, fund it, and politically protect it carry real responsibility... show more

Rick Sanchez

198,207 subscribers

18,616 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“The people fund us, and it is their money that pays your salaries. We serve the people and the country, and therefore we carry a great responsibility toward them. You must fulfill that responsibility.” — Bangladesh Army chief to army personnel.

“The people fund us, and it is their money that pays your salaries. We serve the people and the country, and therefore we carry a great responsibility toward them. You must fulfill that responsibility.” — Bangladesh Army chief to army personnel.

Defence research forum DRF

14,368 просмотров • 15 дней назад

“It’s weird that we judge people who make minimum wage and not the people that pay it.”

“It’s weird that we judge people who make minimum wage and not the people that pay it.”

More Perfect Union

1,206,394 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Pauline Hanson says that she would “defund the ABC” of their “$1.2 billion” dollar a year funding and make it “subscription only” “if people want to pay to watch the ABC, so be it” “I wouldn’t fund it anymore I’d shut it down” “Let the people who want to watch it subsidise it”

Pauline Hanson says that she would “defund the ABC” of their “$1.2 billion” dollar a year funding and make it “subscription only” “if people want to pay to watch the ABC, so be it” “I wouldn’t fund it anymore I’d shut it down” “Let the people who want to watch it subsidise it”

Ryan Dally

150,112 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This network is important for small business. In this conversion, the president's going to dictate who gets to own it or maybe, you know, some committee. Why not let the seven million businesses that make their living, their families living, those are my Shark Tank people out there, why can't they own a piece of this? Why don't they get to invest in it? That would help the conversion period a lot, and it would make it truly the people's platform owned by the people, overseen by their Congress. That's how this deal should go down.

This network is important for small business. In this conversion, the president's going to dictate who gets to own it or maybe, you know, some committee. Why not let the seven million businesses that make their living, their families living, those are my Shark Tank people out there, why can't they own a piece of this? Why don't they get to invest in it? That would help the conversion period a lot, and it would make it truly the people's platform owned by the people, overseen by their Congress. That's how this deal should go down.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

19,424 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

These black men that have patronized this Asian restaurant in the past and had no problems were asked to pay for their food when ordering it and not like they normally do when they’re done with it. They watched as other people that weren’t black weren’t asked to pay like this.

These black men that have patronized this Asian restaurant in the past and had no problems were asked to pay for their food when ordering it and not like they normally do when they’re done with it. They watched as other people that weren’t black weren’t asked to pay like this.

Suzie rizzio

53,653 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kurdish female fighter of the Kurdish opposition party PDKI named Saba told me that the Iranian Kurds "hope the United States and other countries will help us against this regime. This government is a brutal government that kills its own people. It executes people. People are being forced to leave their homes. They kill people who struggle for freedom."

Kurdish female fighter of the Kurdish opposition party PDKI named Saba told me that the Iranian Kurds "hope the United States and other countries will help us against this regime. This government is a brutal government that kills its own people. It executes people. People are being forced to leave their homes. They kill people who struggle for freedom."

Wladimir van Wilgenburg

180,741 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Starmer may be out, but the game hasn’t changed: when leaders fail their own people, they start trying to look tough abroad. More money for war, less for ordinary people at home. That doesn’t help Britain. It helps the defense industry, the political class, and the people who always profit from conflict. Watch LIVE on BitChute at 5:30 PM Moscow time (2:30 PM GMT):

Starmer may be out, but the game hasn’t changed: when leaders fail their own people, they start trying to look tough abroad. More money for war, less for ordinary people at home. That doesn’t help Britain. It helps the defense industry, the political class, and the people who always profit from conflict. Watch LIVE on BitChute at 5:30 PM Moscow time (2:30 PM GMT):

Rick Sanchez

14,280 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

When we say we are nationalists, it is not because we hate other people nor other nations. It’s because we love our own people and put our nation first. It is a glorious thing when we see good people around the world do the same to protect their home.

When we say we are nationalists, it is not because we hate other people nor other nations. It’s because we love our own people and put our nation first. It is a glorious thing when we see good people around the world do the same to protect their home.

Kangmin Lee | 이강민

31,231 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

What absolute nonsense. Don't most people want to work hard to do better by their own families? To have a better house, better holidays, better furniture? Isn't that a worthwhile thing? Wouldn't life be very much better if more people took responsibility for their families and for building their own future? And when they do that, and have a little bit left over to help people less fortunate than themselves—isn't that a good thing? And aren't we trying to get the Third World out of the poverty it's in by building up its industries and having some investment to go and help them with? John Wesley answered the question you just put: 'Do not impute to money the faults of human nature.' It's not the money, it's not the wealth you create; it's what you do with it. Many people use their money to do more for the arts, to see more, to enjoy more of the great artistic works. Look at the fantastic voluntary effort in this country. It's enormous. Greed? Isn't it absurd! Trade unions mostly argue for higher wages. They argue for bigger differentials. Some people are greedy. But people who want a better standard of living and better way of life for their children are not. They're highly moral. They're highly valued citizens and they're usually those people who look after their houses, their families and they look after their neighbourhoods—community spirit. This is the real 'Thatcherism'.

What absolute nonsense. Don't most people want to work hard to do better by their own families? To have a better house, better holidays, better furniture? Isn't that a worthwhile thing? Wouldn't life be very much better if more people took responsibility for their families and for building their own future? And when they do that, and have a little bit left over to help people less fortunate than themselves—isn't that a good thing? And aren't we trying to get the Third World out of the poverty it's in by building up its industries and having some investment to go and help them with? John Wesley answered the question you just put: 'Do not impute to money the faults of human nature.' It's not the money, it's not the wealth you create; it's what you do with it. Many people use their money to do more for the arts, to see more, to enjoy more of the great artistic works. Look at the fantastic voluntary effort in this country. It's enormous. Greed? Isn't it absurd! Trade unions mostly argue for higher wages. They argue for bigger differentials. Some people are greedy. But people who want a better standard of living and better way of life for their children are not. They're highly moral. They're highly valued citizens and they're usually those people who look after their houses, their families and they look after their neighbourhoods—community spirit. This is the real 'Thatcherism'.

Margaret Thatcher

147,276 просмотров • 2 лет назад

We spent $22 trillion to “fight poverty.” But 70% of that money $15.4 trillion, never touched the poor. It went to the people who serve the poor, not the ones who are poor! That’s not liberation. That’s a business model. They don’t ask, “How do we solve it?” They ask, “How do we fund it?

We spent $22 trillion to “fight poverty.” But 70% of that money $15.4 trillion, never touched the poor. It went to the people who serve the poor, not the ones who are poor! That’s not liberation. That’s a business model. They don’t ask, “How do we solve it?” They ask, “How do we fund it?

Bob Woodson

91,195 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Joe Rogan reveals to Tom Segura the one thing about January 6th that still disturbs him over five years later. ROGAN: “Here’s what’s f*cked...” “For sure...there were government people that were rabble-rousers.” “There were people that were trying to get people to go into the Capitol.” “That’s a fact. How many?” “They call them ‘agent provocateurs.’ So there’s people that your tax dollars pay that were trying to get people to commit crimes.” “We don’t know how many...” SEGURA: “We don’t know. Yeah.” ROGAN: “And supposedly, no, they were just there to monitor. Really?” “Okay, but we know that people have done that in the past, where they encourage people to commit crimes.” “And we do know that there was some knowledge that this was going to happen and that they wanted it to happen.” “They wanted it to happen exactly that way, and they encouraged people to do it so they could make it look like Donald Trump is a real threat and keep him from running for reelection again.”

Joe Rogan reveals to Tom Segura the one thing about January 6th that still disturbs him over five years later. ROGAN: “Here’s what’s f*cked...” “For sure...there were government people that were rabble-rousers.” “There were people that were trying to get people to go into the Capitol.” “That’s a fact. How many?” “They call them ‘agent provocateurs.’ So there’s people that your tax dollars pay that were trying to get people to commit crimes.” “We don’t know how many...” SEGURA: “We don’t know. Yeah.” ROGAN: “And supposedly, no, they were just there to monitor. Really?” “Okay, but we know that people have done that in the past, where they encourage people to commit crimes.” “And we do know that there was some knowledge that this was going to happen and that they wanted it to happen.” “They wanted it to happen exactly that way, and they encouraged people to do it so they could make it look like Donald Trump is a real threat and keep him from running for reelection again.”

Overton

460,432 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Edwin Sifuna: In his other life, Oparanya told us that Hustler Fund was a grant and that people who borrowed it should not pay it back CS Oparanya: I didn’t say Hustler Fund is a grant. I only said it should not be paid

Edwin Sifuna: In his other life, Oparanya told us that Hustler Fund was a grant and that people who borrowed it should not pay it back CS Oparanya: I didn’t say Hustler Fund is a grant. I only said it should not be paid

Citizen TV Kenya

128,426 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 Anna Paulina Luna just summed up socialism perfectly: rules for thee, not for me. That is always how this garbage works. The elites sell “fairness” to normal people while they protect their own money, their own power, their own security, and their own comfortable lives. They tell working Americans to sacrifice, pay more, accept less, give up freedom, trust the government, and stop complaining, while the same political class lives by a completely different set of rules. Socialism is not compassion. It is control wrapped in fake morality. It makes the people poorer, the government stronger, and the ruling class untouchable. Every time the left tries to rebrand it with softer words, remember the truth: they do not want equality, they want power.

🚨 Anna Paulina Luna just summed up socialism perfectly: rules for thee, not for me. That is always how this garbage works. The elites sell “fairness” to normal people while they protect their own money, their own power, their own security, and their own comfortable lives. They tell working Americans to sacrifice, pay more, accept less, give up freedom, trust the government, and stop complaining, while the same political class lives by a completely different set of rules. Socialism is not compassion. It is control wrapped in fake morality. It makes the people poorer, the government stronger, and the ruling class untouchable. Every time the left tries to rebrand it with softer words, remember the truth: they do not want equality, they want power.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

48,899 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here’s a message for Trump: seniors who need their Social Security do not want to have to deal with an AI chatbot. The PEOPLE pay for Social Security—the government owes the PEOPLE that money. When you make it harder for Americans to get their benefits—that’s a benefit cut.

Here’s a message for Trump: seniors who need their Social Security do not want to have to deal with an AI chatbot. The PEOPLE pay for Social Security—the government owes the PEOPLE that money. When you make it harder for Americans to get their benefits—that’s a benefit cut.

Senator Patty Murray

40,284 просмотров • 1 год назад

Joe Rogan: "People who do not have children do not understand the drive that it gives you to protect and care for those little people. It's kind of crazy."

Joe Rogan: "People who do not have children do not understand the drive that it gives you to protect and care for those little people. It's kind of crazy."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

30,244 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

One of the most significant conversations I had in Red Deer was not with a longtime political activist, a public figure, or someone who lives and breathes this stuff every day. It was with ordinary Albertans who told me they had never really been involved in politics before. They said they had never canvassed. Never stepped forward publicly like this. Never imagined they would be out on the side of the road waving flags and speaking openly about Alberta independence. And yet there they were. That matters. It matters because movements do not become real when the loudest voices get louder. They become real when regular people, people who used to stay out of politics entirely, start feeling that the situation has become too important to ignore. That is what I think this moment represents. These were not people looking for a hobby or some political tribe to join. They were people who felt that Alberta may be staring at a rare window of opportunity, and that if we let it slip through our fingers, we may never get another one like it again. That is a very different kind of energy. It is one thing for committed independence supporters to keep making the case year after year. It is another thing entirely when people who were never engaged before begin to say: This is our chance. We cannot waste it. We may not get another one. That tells me the movement is moving beyond its old boundaries. It also helps explain why this issue hits so deeply for so many families. A lot of these people are not motivated by abstract theory. They are thinking about their kids, their grandkids, their cost of living, their ability to build a future here, and whether Alberta will remain a place where ordinary people can still prosper and live with a sense of freedom and dignity. When people like that start showing up, it means the issue has become personal. And once something becomes personal, it gets much harder for the political class to dismiss it as fringe. That may be the deeper significance of what is happening. The independence movement is no longer just being carried by the usual voices. It is pulling in people who had almost given up on politics entirely. People who had tuned out. People who thought nothing would ever change. People who are now saying that maybe this is the moment when Albertans finally have to stop waiting for Ottawa to fix things and start taking responsibility for their own future. Agree or disagree with them, that is not something to laugh off. That is a sign of a population beginning to wake up. And when ordinary people start believing that this may be their last real chance to change the direction of their province, that is when movements become powerful. That is when they stop being theoretical. That is when they become hard to ignore.

One of the most significant conversations I had in Red Deer was not with a longtime political activist, a public figure, or someone who lives and breathes this stuff every day. It was with ordinary Albertans who told me they had never really been involved in politics before. They said they had never canvassed. Never stepped forward publicly like this. Never imagined they would be out on the side of the road waving flags and speaking openly about Alberta independence. And yet there they were. That matters. It matters because movements do not become real when the loudest voices get louder. They become real when regular people, people who used to stay out of politics entirely, start feeling that the situation has become too important to ignore. That is what I think this moment represents. These were not people looking for a hobby or some political tribe to join. They were people who felt that Alberta may be staring at a rare window of opportunity, and that if we let it slip through our fingers, we may never get another one like it again. That is a very different kind of energy. It is one thing for committed independence supporters to keep making the case year after year. It is another thing entirely when people who were never engaged before begin to say: This is our chance. We cannot waste it. We may not get another one. That tells me the movement is moving beyond its old boundaries. It also helps explain why this issue hits so deeply for so many families. A lot of these people are not motivated by abstract theory. They are thinking about their kids, their grandkids, their cost of living, their ability to build a future here, and whether Alberta will remain a place where ordinary people can still prosper and live with a sense of freedom and dignity. When people like that start showing up, it means the issue has become personal. And once something becomes personal, it gets much harder for the political class to dismiss it as fringe. That may be the deeper significance of what is happening. The independence movement is no longer just being carried by the usual voices. It is pulling in people who had almost given up on politics entirely. People who had tuned out. People who thought nothing would ever change. People who are now saying that maybe this is the moment when Albertans finally have to stop waiting for Ottawa to fix things and start taking responsibility for their own future. Agree or disagree with them, that is not something to laugh off. That is a sign of a population beginning to wake up. And when ordinary people start believing that this may be their last real chance to change the direction of their province, that is when movements become powerful. That is when they stop being theoretical. That is when they become hard to ignore.

Jon Alberta Patriot

17,680 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"The worst kind of bioweapon wouldn't kill a lot of people, it would disable a lot of people and kill people slowly over time. You wouldn't want it to just start killing, because if that were to happen you would very quickly identify those people who had been exposed and who were dying and who were at risk of spreading it and you would create an extremely strict lockdown to keep them in place and not let them spread it to the rest of the population, whereas with a very slow death blow that takes years to play out and also disables a lot of people, that can destroy an economy and kill people over the long run, so it might take a couple of years, 5 years, 10 years it might take more."

"The worst kind of bioweapon wouldn't kill a lot of people, it would disable a lot of people and kill people slowly over time. You wouldn't want it to just start killing, because if that were to happen you would very quickly identify those people who had been exposed and who were dying and who were at risk of spreading it and you would create an extremely strict lockdown to keep them in place and not let them spread it to the rest of the population, whereas with a very slow death blow that takes years to play out and also disables a lot of people, that can destroy an economy and kill people over the long run, so it might take a couple of years, 5 years, 10 years it might take more."

Dr. Syed Haider:

66,495 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Serving people is not just a principle, it is the highest responsibility one can carry. The faith shown by the people of Diamond Harbour is deeply humbling, and I regard that trust as a sacred duty that must be honoured through action, not words. As long as our Gonodebota continue to stand by me with their love and confidence, my resolve to protect their health, dignity, and future will remain unwavering. This commitment is not conditional, not temporary, and not symbolic. It is total, enduring, and driven by the belief that public service must always put people first.

Serving people is not just a principle, it is the highest responsibility one can carry. The faith shown by the people of Diamond Harbour is deeply humbling, and I regard that trust as a sacred duty that must be honoured through action, not words. As long as our Gonodebota continue to stand by me with their love and confidence, my resolve to protect their health, dignity, and future will remain unwavering. This commitment is not conditional, not temporary, and not symbolic. It is total, enduring, and driven by the belief that public service must always put people first.

Abhishek Banerjee

147,179 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад