Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

'Some think this military operation will make Iran more radical, more angry... that's insanity!' This week's first Uncensored - just dropped!👇 📺 Piers Morgan | Anthony Scaramucci | J. Hogan Gidley | Brian McGinnis | Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷 | Shashank Joshi | Seyed Mohammad Marandi

103,216 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇮🇷🇺🇸 The Strait of Hormuz may be reopening, but not on America's terms. Reports suggest Iran and Oman are close to finalising a new arrangement for shipping through the Strait, which, at first glance, looks like a de-escalation; Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi says it is anything but. According to him, this isn't America restoring the old order; it's adapting to a new one. Iran has made one point non-negotiable: Nothing moves through Hormuz without Tehran knowing about it. Prof. Marandi says Oman and Iran have spent weeks negotiating a framework that keeps the Strait coordinated rather than divided. Iran insisted it would never accept a system where Oman managed one side while Tehran had no oversight of the other. Instead, he says, every vessel would remain subject to Iranian coordination. And even if an agreement is signed, that doesn't mean Hormuz suddenly returns to normal. Prof. Marandi argues that Trump first has to return to the broader Memorandum of Understanding that Washington abandoned. That means more than just shipping; it means sanctions relief, releasing frozen Iranian assets, and potentially new understandings covering Yemen and Gaza as well. Only then, he says, can the Strait be fully normalised. And the kicker this time is that Prof. Marandi doesn't believe Iran will simply reopen Hormuz and trust Washington to keep its promises later. He says Tehran will want key concessions delivered first. Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Mario Nawfal

352,550 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

🚨 URGENT: Trump's Ultimatum Deadline on Tuesday Risks Pushing Persian Gulf to Economic Devastation Prof. Mohammad Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) delivers a stark warning in the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive: "I think (if Trump makes good on his threat to destroy Iran's energy systems nationwide) we're going to see the complete destruction of all oil and gas installations and electricity and water desalination plants in the Persian Gulf region. And that will be the end of oil and gas from this region permanently." "Basically, that's what Trump is pushing for. And I think we're on the verge of a global economic depression that will be far more devastating than 1929." "The Iranians are not going to back down under any circumstances. There's not a chance because the Iranians are saying a ceasefire is just an opportunity for Trump and Netanyahu and the Zionist lobby to rearm and to regroup and then to attack and slaughter Iranians again." In terms of what terms Iran would be willing to consider to end the war and open the Straits, Marandi said "This is a war of aggression and therefore there has to be compensation." U.S. strategy in the Middle East is difficult to identify. Trump's objectives and justification for launching the conflict changes almost by the day. This confusion risk sending the conflict in directions that could result in global economic collapse. Watch the full clip from right now 👇 👉 #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #PersianGulf #GlobalDepression #DanielDavisDeepDive #MohammadMarandi #USStrategy #WarOfAggression #OilCrisis #Geopolitics #Trump #Iran

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

44,524 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 THE IRAN BOMBSHELL: 4 POISON PILLS FOR TRUMP 🚨 Professor Seyed Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) drops a bomb that few in America realize: If four key Iranian demands are not met, there will be no deal and the Strait will remain closed, indefinitely, to Gulf oil and gas: 1) The unfreezing of billions of Iranian assets as a first step by the U.S. 2) Sanctions relief on all energy-related concerns 3) And END of war decree and maybe the biggest of all: 4) Israel must completely END its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon Any one of these requirements for Iran would be a poison pill for Trump, but Prof Marandi - who frankly stated he is not a government official and therefore does not formally speak for them - stated his firm belief that the Iranian gov would not open the Straits until ALL FOUR CONDITIONS had been met. Netanyahu is thus far not merely unwilling to engage in a ceasefire with Hezbollah, he is planning on EXPANDING the conflict. President Trump is therefore in a very difficult position of having to demand Netanyahu's submission to this term, or the US and global economies are going to continue suffering. Prof Marandi acknowledged that the longer the dueling blockades remain in place, Iran will also continue and deepen in its suffering, but he argues that they have the willingness to endure much more pain than the west, and they can endure it more effectively than the United States. We will see who proves to be the best at suffering, because a failure to agree to a diplomatic end by the US on terms Iran will agree to, is far worse than trying to force the matter by trying to restart the war: Iran will then torch the entire Middle Eastern energy system, plunging the world into a likely deep economic depression. The stakes could not be higher for the U.S. to learn some humility and suck down these ugly terms. If we do not do so willingly, we will pay a MUCH higher price. 📺 Watch the full episode of Daniel Davis Deep Dive now 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #EnergyCrisis #DanielDavis #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

46,927 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

. Megyn Kelly is not secretly Soros funded and she is not evil. She is a sharp broadcaster who has spent years next to Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, who are seriously misguiding the American people and you can hear that influence when she keeps asking “Why are we going to war, and for whom are we going to war?” Now her critics are screaming that she hosted a “Soros funded” Iranian guest, Sohrab Ahmari, to attack Trump’s Iran strikes. Some of Ahmari’s outlets have taken Open Society money, however, the real issue is not one grant. The real issue is why Megyn keeps bringing on voices who tell Americans this is someone else’s war instead of explaining why the Iranian regime is a direct threat to American security. Listen to how she frames it. She says she is asking herself if this is Israel’s war or Iran’s war, not America’s war. She talks about Secretary Marco Rubio in the Gang of Eight saying Israel was going to go in so “we thought we had to go in.” That story feeds the idea that Washington is only acting for Israel, and it erases the US national security reasons to hit this regime. While President Donald J. Trump is finally hitting the world’s biggest state sponsor of terrorism, Megyn’s guest choices are teaching Americans to fear regime change more than the regime that arms terrorists and targets Americans. She has a choice now: keep platforming people who repeat “this is not our war,” or bring on Iranians like Elica Le Bon الیکا‌ ل بن or Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷 or Mahsa Townsend who actually know the regime, know the IRGC, and can explain why taking this dictatorship down is very much an American national security interest. #Iran #RezaPahlavi

Kusha

16,661 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

MUST WATCH 🔴🔴 Islamic regime mouthpiece Mohammad Marandi threatens total war against the U.S., vows full scale retaliation over even a “token strike,” warns of shutting the Strait of Hormuz, sinking commercial ships, destroying oil and gas infrastructure, targeting trillions of dollars in non military U.S. assets, collapsing Gulf monarchies within hours, igniting chaos across West Asia and the Caucasus, and triggering a global economic crash Mohammad Marandi: “Yes, that is something that the Americans have put to the Iranians, that we will carry out some token strike and you can carry out some token strike. The Iranians said no. The Iranians have responded to the Americans that even a token strike will be met with full force, and the reason is twofold. One is that even a token strike is an act of war. But more importantly, I think, is the fact that the Iranians recognize that if the United States is allowed to carry out some limited strike, that only opens the door for future strikes. Four months down the road, some false flag operation will be carried out somewhere in Europe, somewhere in North America, somewhere in our region. Mossad will kill a few Israelis or something like that, and then they will blame Iran. Then there will be more threats against the country and attacks, or they will stage more riots or hire people to bring chaos to some city in Iran. Then again Trump will come in to save the Iranian people by murdering Iranian people. This is something that the Iranians are saying we cannot tolerate. So it has to end now. If the United States attacks, whether it is symbolic or whether it is a major assault, the Iranians are going to launch an all-out assault. It will be directed toward U.S. bases. Of course, it will be directed toward the U.S. Navy, but it will also be directed toward all U.S. interests across the region. That can mean many things that are non-military, and that means trillions of dollars of assets will be targeted. The Iranians have already spoken about shutting the Strait of Hormuz, which is very easy to do. It is not just about the strait itself that can be shut down. They can sink the ships that go through the strait. They have thousands of anti-ship missiles based in the Persian Gulf that can destroy everything in the Persian Gulf region. They can destroy the ports. They can destroy the oil and gas facilities. They can destroy the pipelines. And they can do the same outside the Strait of Hormuz and in the Indian Ocean. So if there is war, I believe that the oil and gas trade across West Asia and the Caucasus will come to an end, and that will lead to a global economic crash. U.S. assets in the region will, of course, be targeted. Those Arab countries that host U.S. bases, which are as we speak being used to plan against Iran, will be complicit. I do not think these Arab regimes will last more than a few hours or a few days or at most a few weeks. Some of these entities have passport-holding populations of a few hundred thousand to a million, and foreign workers outnumber citizens 5 to 1 or 10 to 1. Most of the foreign workers are adult males. So if there is chaos, I think the regimes will collapse, and that will change the map of the region permanently. From my understanding, it would be insanity for President Trump to attack Iran. But Trump is surrounded by Israeli supporters. Congress and the Senate are controlled by Israeli supporters. The Epstein documents give us a very small view into the ugly reality of the ruling class. So even though it is insanity, it is quite plausible that an attack will happen.”

Open Source Intel

131,196 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten